controlling potw pass- through /interference due … presentation.pdfrecommendation: treat at the...
TRANSCRIPT
Controlling POTW Pass-
Through /Interference
Due to Compatible Pollutants
Elaine J. Venema, P.E.
September 2013
Nutritional Supplements/Dairy
Fruit Processing/Canning
Pickling Operations
Tannery/Rendering
Flour/Grain Mills
Egg/Poultry
Breweries
Win-win solution Protect the POTW (collection & WWTP)
and the environment
Maintain or attract industry
Good for the community!
Community Expectations/Goals
Industry Needs/Expectations
Finances/Funding Opportunities
Full Treatment: Separate from POTW
Direct discharge
Challenges
Pretreatment: Screening
Primary Treatment
Solids Separation
Chemical Addition
Biological Pretreatment
Source Treatment
Variable waste loading
Need operations staff
Treatment onsite not always
desired/feasible
Discharge (NPDES or GW)
Determine what level is needed for win-win
Waste minimization & Best Management Practices
Pretreat to “domestic”
And everything in between!
Waste Stream Segregation
Equalization/Slug Prevention
Sidehill screen, or other
Grease interceptor (larger than this one)
Sidehill Screen
Grease
Interceptor
Concentrate waste products
To be hauled to POTW/anaerobic digester
Solids separation (belt press, etc)
Can waste solids be used as livestock feed?
Belt Press
Tannery
Food Supplement Mfg
High BOD, and Toxics Hair/Flesh
FOG Leather chunks
Slug loading
Making … “Soft Corinthian Leather”
Project Planning:
Hides per day
Capacity Evaluation
Meetings with SIU
Pilot Studies
Estimate Odor Control Needs
SIU Decision – Independence
from POTW
http://leather
Full Treatment Onsite
Oxidation Ditch
NPDES Discharge
Evaluate short rock media TF tall plastic media TF
Project Planning:
Capacity Evaluation
Meetings with SIU
Capacity modeling GPSx
Pilot Study
Estimate Odor/Corrosion$
Industry Reconsideration
Pilot Study
Towards …
13,000 #/Day
Pilot study and evaluation: a TALL trickling filter is req’d
Financing: cash + grant Discussions with industry
Initial decision: pH pretreatment/equalization:
Not just WWTP improvements: Long F.M. with high BOD/Temp
Final result: SIU built pretreatment onsite, SBR
Discharge to POTW : Domestic strength BOD, TSS
So you want to treat at the POTW, now what?
Next Steps:
Capacity Analysis
Ordinance/Legal Review
& Determine Local Limits
WWTP Improvements, if
necessary
Capacity Analysis:
Evaluate flows & loads
Engineering calculations –
MAHLs, AORs, organic
loading, hydraulics
Identify processes with
insufficient capacity –Headworks? Secondary Trt?
Install more blowers
Switch out media
(e.g. rock trickling filter plastic media)
Add media to aeration tanks
(e.g. Conventional AS IFAS)
Construct influent equalization
Construct parallel treatment units
Expand existing tanks – deeper SWD
Add roughing and/or polishing treatment
Negotiate with industry to pay for upgrade All? Definitely pay their fair share (“proportionate”)
Have industry pay for a portion of upgrade Especially effective if a WWTF upgrade is planned already
and a few additional improvements are needed to
accommodate the industry
MEDC or Economic Development Authority
In conjunction with USDA RD grant/loan; SRF
Capacity Analysis:
Blueberry Processor
Pickle Processors
Groundwater discharge … no longer an option
WWTP Improvements were needed
(switch from groundwater to surface water discharge)
Identified Industry needs
discussed future BOD Trt needs vs production GREAT Marriage (win-win) of
Tanks with available treatment volume … minimum HRT
A home for Lots of MBBR plastic media … enough for berries
“Tell ya what … buy s’more plastic and couple of blowers, we’ll
call it good, Vinnie” Then, we’ll dedicate the service capacity.
MBBR
Lagoon
MBBR
Lagoon
COD in lieu of BOD5 This is so Important
Shows up in the anaerobic digester, not Aeration Tank
Acetic/lactic acid is biodegradable
Seasonality of loading is large
Like clockwork- peaking in August
Biogas production is (mostly) wonderful
Historic odor & corrosion in 27 mile FM big problem
Slug loading noted at the digester AND big biogas
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
08/03/12 08/23/12 09/12/12 10/02/12 10/22/12 11/11/12 12/01/12 12/21/12 01/10/13
Bio
ga
s (
cf/
da
y)
Date
Actual Biogas
Low Estimate of Theoretical
High Estimate of Theoretical
Pickle Production takes
off in Mid-August
COD in lieu of BOD5
Sticks well on biofilm/media (if no digester)
Project in the planning/preliminary design phase
Review of industrial flow/BOD
Surcharges were applied based on BOD5
How well did that reflect the loading? (COD not BOD5)
Two-stage attached growth is great NPDES protection
No biomass “washout” + biofilm “pockets”
Expansion is desired – Over Doubling!
(see previous steps)
Recommendation: Treat at the POTW, increase
capacity