conversation analysis-preference structure

16
Page 1 CONVERSATION, PREFERENCE STRUCTURE DISCOURSE AND CULTURE. LINGUISTICS. TEACHER: VALERIA GRAZIANO. GROUP MEMBERS: Nadya Tolaba. Agustina Giacinty. Adela Pérez del Viso.

Upload: estudio-juridico-perez-del-viso-costanzo-y-pereyra

Post on 01-Jun-2015

3.492 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ppt on Conversation Analysis. Text taken from YULE (Pragmatics). Preference and Non-preference structures. Video: Jurgen Handke 2012. in “The Virtual Linguistic Campus” from www.linguisticsonline.com Turn Taking in Conversation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 1

CONVERSATION, PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

DISCOURSE AND

CULTURE.

LINGUISTICS.TEACHER: VALERIA GRAZIANO.

GROUP MEMBERS:Nadya Tolaba.

Agustina Giacinty.Adela Pérez del Viso.

Page 2: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 2

Interaction and Conversation

Interaction and Conversation.Metaphors: a dance; traffic

crossing an interaction.Best Metaphor: MARKET

ECONOMY.A SCARCE COMMODITY: the

FLOOR. The right to speak.

Page 3: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 3

Turn, Turn-taking, TRP

Turn: to have control of the right to speak. To hold the floor.

When control is not fixed in advance: anyone can try to get control: TURN-TAKING.

Turn-taking depends on every local management system (convention)TRP: Transition Relevance Place: possible-change-of-turn point.

Page 4: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 4

How Conversation is viewed

Speakers are viewed as taking turns at holding the floor.

They accomplish change of turn smoothly: aware of the local management system for taking turns.

Speakers may cooperate and share the floor equally.Speakers could be in competition, fighting to keep the floor.Patterns: according to social groups.

Page 5: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 5

VIDEO.

Jurgen Handke 2012.

“The Virtual Linguistic Campus”www.linguisticsonline.com

Turn Taking in Conversation.

Page 6: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 6

VIDEO. JURGEN HANDKE.

Page 7: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 7

PAUSES and OVERLAPS

• Pauses: silence between turns.• Pauses can be: simple hesitations or

Silences.• Overlaps: both speakers trying to

speak at the same time. • With pauses and Overlaps: NO

FLOW, no SMOOTH RHYTHM to their transitions, SENSE of DISTANCE, ABSENCE OF FAMILIARITY or ease.

Page 8: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 8

PAUSES, OVERLAPS, BACKCHANNELS

• Pauses: silence between turns.• Pauses can be: simple hesitations or

Silences.• Overlaps: both speakers trying to

speak at the same time. • With pauses and Overlaps: NO FLOW,

no SMOOTH RHYTHM to their transitions, SENSE of DISTANCE, ABSENCE OF FAMILIARITY or ease.

Page 9: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 9

Silences

• One “silence” could be NOT attributable to one speaker (Ex. P.73).

• If the silence is attributed to the second speaker and becomes significant: ATTRIBUTABLE SILENCE.

In that case Speaker A turns over the floor to Speaker B and S.B. does not talk. That silence is communicating something.

Page 10: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 10

OVERLAP• The normal expectation: one speaker

at a time.• Overlap: a problem for the local

management system.• Typically: when both speakers attempt

to initiate talk.• May be due to: a) unfamiliar

conversation b) expression of solidarity or closeness.

• It solves: 1 speaker draws attention to be allowed to finish.

Page 11: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 11

TRP• Transition Relevance Place.• Normally Speaker B will wait for a

possible TRP before jumping in.• Dominant people will avoid providing

TRPs. • Avoid TRPs: avoid an open pause at

the end of a syntactic unit. The speaker PROTECTS HIS TURN.

• Extended turn: S A. indicates at first there is a larger structure to your turn. (Ex. P.75). Discussions/ Storytelling.

Page 12: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 12

BACKCHANNELS• Ways of indicating we are listening.• Head nods, smiles, other facial

expressions, gestures.• Backchannels: one way of signalling

we are listening. (uh,uh; mm)• They indicate the listener is following

and not objecting to what the speaker says.

• Normal expectation: backchannel. No backchannel is significant.

Page 13: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 13

• Even within a community of speakers: sufficient variation to cause potential misunderstanding.

• The expectation to lead a conversation very active and at a speed rate (or not): CONVERSATIONAL STYLE.

• High involvement style.• High considerateness style. (non

interrupting, not impossing style)

CONVERSATIONAL STYLE.

Page 14: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 14

• AUTOMATIC PATTERNS in the structure of conversations.

• They consist of a FIRST PART and a SECOND PART. (by different speakers)

• S. A creates the expectation of the 2nd utterance in S.B.(of the same pair)

• Greetings and Goodbyes/ Question/answer sequences/ Ex: P.77

ADJACENCY PAIRS

Page 15: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 15

• Insertion sequence: one adjacency pair within another. (Ex p.78).

• The delay in answering or accepting: the S.B is not uttering the expected response: represents distance between what is expected. Delay is MEANINGFUL.

ADJACENCY PAIRS

Page 16: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE

Page 16

• Yule, G, Pragmatics, Oxford U.P. Hong Kong, 1996. Units 8 to 10.

• www.linguisticsonline.com The Virtual Linguistics Classroom.

SOURCES.