copyright © 2009 pearson education, inc. publishing as prentice hall 5-1 employee testing &...

55
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-1 Employee testing & Selection Chapter 6

Post on 21-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-1

Employee testing & Selection

Chapter 6

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-2

The Basics of Testing and Selecting Employees

– It results in improved employee and organizational performance

– Your own performance always depends on subordinates

– Can reduce dysfunctional behaviors at work– Effective screening helps reduce costs in the

long run

Carefully testing and screening employees is important because

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-3

Legal Implications and Negligent Hiring

• Incompetent hiring can result in legal implications such as unfairly discriminating against a protected group

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-4

• Negligent hiring occurs when employers are liable for employees who have criminal records or other problems that use a customer’s home or similar opportunities to commit crimes

– Hiring these types of employees requires safeguards

– Reasonable action must be taken to investigate the candidate’s backgrounds

Legal Implications and Negligent Hiring, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-5

Testing for Reliability

• Reliability is the consistency of scores obtained by the same person when retested with the identical test or an equivalent form of the test

– Retest estimate compares two test scores taken by the same individual at different times

– Equivalent-form estimate compares the original test with a different but equivalent test taken by the same individual at a different time

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-6

– Internal comparison estimates look at question groupings to statistically analyze the degree to which responses to this group vary together

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-7

Testing and Validity

• Test validity means that the test is measuring what it is supposed to measure

• Validity often refers to evidence the test is job-related and test performance is a valid predictor of job performance

• Two measures of validity are criterion validity which means those who do well on the test perform well on the job (and vice versa) and content validity which means the test constitutes a fair sample of the job content

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-8

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-9

Individual Rights of Test Takersand Test Security

• Test takers have various privacy and information rights

• The American Psychological Association’s standards for educational and psychological tests include

– The right to confidentiality of results

– The right to informed consent regarding use of results

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-10

– The right to expect only qualified individuals will have access to the results

– The right to expect the test is secure

Individual Rights of Test Takersand Test Security, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-11

Using Tests as Supplements

• Do not use tests as your only selection method - use tests to supplement other methods like interviews and background checks

• Remember that tests are not infallible

• Most tests are more predicative at identifying candidates that will likely fail rather than succeed

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-12

Using Tests at Work

• Employers have long used tests to predict behavior and performance

• Example: Are you prone to on-the-job accidents?

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-13

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-14

How Are Tests Used at Work?

• Online and off-line computerized tests or aptitude tests could be used to measure a wide range of candidate attributes including:

• Cognitive abilities

• Motor and physical abilities

• Personality and interests

• Achievement

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-15

Tests of Cognitive Abilities

• Employers often assess a candidate’s cognitive or mental abilities, for example: Is the bookkeeping candidate good with numbers?

• Intelligence or IQ tests look at general intellectual abilities including memory, vocabulary, verbal fluency and numeric ability

• Aptitude tests measure specific mental abilities

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-16

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-17

Tests of Motor and Physical Abilities

• Motor or physical abilities might need to be measured for specific jobs

– Finger dexterity

– Strength

– Manual dexterity

– Reaction time

– Speed of finger, hand or arm movements

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-18

Measuring Personality

• Personality tests and interest inventories measure and predict intangibles such as attitude, motivation and temperament

• A sample personality item:

It does not make sense to work hard on something if no one will notice:

A. Definitely true D. Somewhat false

B. Somewhat true E. Definitely false

C. Neither true nor false

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-19

Personality Test Effectiveness

• Difficulties notwithstanding – studies confirm that personality tests can help companies hire more effective workers

• Measure relationships between the five personality dimensions below with job performance criteria:

– Extroversion

– Emotional stability

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-20

– Agreeableness

– Conscientiousness

– Openness to experience

Personality Test Effectiveness, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-21

Interest Inventories and Achievement Tests

• Interest inventories compare one’s interests with those of people in various occupations

• Achievement tests basically measure what a person has learned

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-22

Computerized and Online Testing

• Replacing conventional paper-and-pencil and manual tests

• Computerized tests usually score individuals the same as manual tests

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-23

Management Assessment Centers

• In a Management Assessment Center management candidates take tests and make decisions in simulated situations while observers score their performance

• Average time at center is usually 2 or 3 days and involves 10 to 12 candidates

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-24

Examples of simulated realistic exercises include:

– The in-basket creates a situation where the candidate is faced with an accumulation of reports, memos, phone messages, letters, etc., of the simulated job he or she is to take over while being evaluated on what action he or she takes for each of these materials

Management Assessment Centers, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-25

– The leaderless group discussion occurs when a leaderless group is given a discussion question and told to arrive at a group decision while observers evaluate leadership ability, acceptance by group, etc.

– Individual presentations used to evaluate a participant’s communication skills and his or her persuasiveness by orally presenting on an assigned topic

Management Assessment Centers, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-26

Interviewing Candidates

• Interviewing is an indispensible management tool

• An Interview is a procedure designed to solicit information from a person’s oral responses to oral inquiries

• A Selection Interview is designed to predict future job performance based on candidate’s answers

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-27

Types of Selection Interviews

• Non-structured (questions are asked as you think of them) versus structured interviews (questions are known and the order specified in advance)

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-28

• There are different types of questions for different types of interviews

– Situational interviews ask what would the candidate’s behavior be in a given situation

– Behavioral interviews ask how the candidate has reacted in a similar situation in the past

Types of Selection Interviews, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-29

• Interviews are also classified by how they are administered

• One-on-one interviews were two people meet alone and one interviews the other

• Sequential interviews occur when several people interview the applicant in sequence before a decision is made

Types of Selection Interviews, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-30

• Panel interviews are when the candidate is interviewed simultaneously by a group

• Interviews can also occur via video or phone

Types of Selection Interviews, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-31

How Useful Are Interviews?

• Statistical evidence regarding validity is mixed indicating that the key to usefulness depends on type of interview employed

– When predicting job performance the situational interview yields more accurate results

– Structured interviews, regardless of content, are more valid for predicting job performance

– One-on-one interviews tend to be more valid than panel interviews

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-32

Avoiding Common Interview Mistakes

• Do not make snap judgments

• Do not emphasize the negative

• Make sure you know the job for which you are interviewing the candidate

• Do not let the pressure to hire color your opinions

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-33

• Do not allow candidate order (contrast) error to influence the interview

• Take into consideration the influence of nonverbal behavior and guard against bias

• Remember to look beyond the candidate’s physical attractiveness

• Be wary of ingratiating and self-promoting behaviors

Avoiding Common Interview Mistakes, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-34

• Prepare and plan for the interview

• Establish rapport with the candidate

• Ask appropriate questions

Avoiding Common Interview Mistakes, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-35

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-36

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-37

The Dos and Don’ts of Interview Questions

• Don’t ask questions that can be answered “yes” or “no”

• Don’t put words in the applicant’s mouth or telegraph the desired answer by nodding or smiling when the right answer is given

• Don’t interrogate the applicant as if the person is a criminal

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-38

• Don’t be patronizing, sarcastic or inattentive

• Don’t monopolize the interview by rambling nor let the applicant dominate the interview so you can’t ask all your questions

• Do ask open-ended questions

• Do listen to the candidate to encourage him or her to express thoughts fully

The Do’s and Don’ts of Interview Questions, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-39

• Do draw out the applicant’s opinions and feelings by repeating the person’s last comment as a question

• Do ask for examples

The Do’s and Don'ts of Interview Questions, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-40

Closing the Interview

• Leave time to answer any questions the candidate may have

• If appropriate advocate your firm to the candidate

• Try to end the interview on a positive note

• Tell the applicant whether there’s interest and what the next step will be

• Make rejections diplomatically

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-41

Using Other Selection Techniques

• Conduct background investigations

– Check social networking sites

– Talk to current and previous supervisors to discover more about person’s motivation, competence and ability to work with others

– Perform credit check or use employment screening services

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-42

• Perform reference checks

– Make sure the candidate has signed a release

– Always get two forms of identification and make applicants fill out job applications

– Use a structured reference checking form

– Use given references as a source for others

– Ask the right questions and judge whether the reference’s answers are evasive

Using Other Selection Techniques, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-43

– Ask open-ended questions and listen carefully

– Make sure checking references is done by authorized managers

– Can be ineffective due to legal repercussions or a current supervisor might give a bad employee a good reference to get rid of the employee

Using Other Selection Techniques, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-44

Honesty Testing

• The Polygraph or lie-detector is a device that measures physiological changes such as increased perspiration– Results are interpreted assuming that such

changes reflect emotional stress– Employee Polygraph Protection Act prohibits

most employers from conducting polygraph exams on applicants and most employees

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-45

• Paper-and-pencil honest tests– Measure attitudes regarding tolerance of

others who steal– Acceptance of

rationalizations for theft

– Admission of theft- related activities

Honesty Testing, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-46

Spotting Dishonesty

• Ask blunt questions

• Listen, rather than talk

• Ask for a credit check

• Check all references

• Consider using a paper-and-pencil test

• Test for drugs

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-47

• Conduct searches

• Communicate with employees

• Use caution

Spotting Dishonesty, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-48

More Steps to Selecting Candidates

• Graphology is also known as handwriting analysis and has questionable validity

• Physical exams can confirm the applicant qualifies for the physical requirements of the position or possibly detect communicable diseases unknown to the applicant– Must comply with ADA regulations– Only permitted if such exams are standard

practice

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-49

• Drug screening

– Commonly done before candidates are formally hired

– Many firms test current employees after a work accident or when there are obvious behavioral symptoms

– Some companies administer drug tests randomly on a periodic basis

– Some firms only administer drug tests when transferring or promoting employees

More Steps to Selecting Candidates, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-50

• Problems with drug testing

– Doesn’t correlate with actual impairment levels and there are many products that exist to help employees beat drug tests

– Some argue drug testing violates employees right to privacy and due process while others feel the procedures are degrading and intrusive

– Some say positive results are irrelevant to performing the job

More Steps to Selecting Candidates, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-51

• Legal issues with drug screening

– Under the Americans with Disabilities Act a court might view a former drug user as a qualified applicant with a disability

– Some regulations require testing of workers with sensitive or safety-related jobs

More Steps to Selecting Candidates, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-52

Complying with Immigration Law

• The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires people to prove that they are eligible to be employed in the United States

– Is the candidate a U.S. citizen?

– Is the candidate an alien lawfully authorized to work in the U.S.?

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-53

There are two basic ways to document compliance

– Prospective employees can show their U.S. passport or alien registration card proving both identity and employment eligibility

– Prospective employees can show a separate documents that prove identity and show employment eligibility, i.e. a work permit

Complying with Immigration Law, cont.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-54

Evaluating the Selection Process

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-55

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,

in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United

States of America.