copyright infringement tracker survey, 5th wave (full text report)

Upload: ljs-infodocket

Post on 07-Aug-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    1/60

     

    OnlineCopyrightInfringementTracker

    Wave5(CoveringperiodMar15–May15)  

    Overviewandkeyfindings

    ResearchcommissionedbytheIntellectualPropertyOfficeandcarriedoutby:KantarMedia.

    Submittedversion:10thJuly2015

     ThisisanindependentreportcommissionedbytheIntellectualPropertyOffice(IPO).

    © Crown copyright 2015

    2015/47Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    2/60

     

     

     AboutKantarMedia

    KantarMediaisawellestablishedbrandoftrustedmediaanalystsand

    advisors.Wehelptheworldsadvertisers,mediaowners,advertising/

    media/PRagencies,andpublisherstogetherwithgovernment,NGO,and

    tradeorganisationstomeasuretheirmediareputationandimpact.

    KantarMediahasastrongtrackrecordinresearchingandunderstanding

    aboutthecopyrightinfringementarea,havingconductedtheIllegalfile

    sharingpilotforOfcomin2010andthreesubsequentwavesoftheOCI

    tracker.

     Abouttheauthorofthisreport:

    EuanMackay,Director,KantarMedia

    Euanhasextensiveexperienceinmediaresearchexperience.Heisa

    regularconferencespeaker,havingspokenatthe2013MRGannual

    conferenceatBafta,attheWARCconferenceatLordsinApril,was

    electedasatop10speakerattheARFRethink:2014conferenceinNew

     YorkCityinMay.Add itionallyhespoke(andwasvotedrunnerupinthe

    bestspeakercategory)attheMRGinternationalconferenceinBerlinlast

    November.

    ISBN:978-1-908908-97-1

    CopyrightandtheValueofthePublicDomain:An

    empiricalassessment

    PublishedbyTheIntellectualPropertyOfficeJuly

    2015

    12345678910

    ©CrownCopyright2015

     Youmayreusethisinformation(excludinglogos)

    freeofchargeinanyformatormedium,underthe

    termsoftheOpenGovernmentLicence.Toview

    thislicence,visithttp://www.nationalarchives.gov.

    uk/doc/opengovernmentlicence/

    oremail:[email protected]

    Wherewehaveidentifiedanythirdpartycopyright

    informationyouwillneedtoobtainpermissionfrom

    thecopyrightholdersconcerned.

     Anyenquiriesregardingthispublicationshouldbesentto:

     TheIntellectualPropertyOffice

    ConceptHouse

    CardiffRoad

    Newport

    NP108QQ

     Tel:03003002000Fax:01633817777

    email:[email protected]

     Thispublicat ionisavailablefromourwebsiteat

    www.gov.uk/ipo

    http:///reader/full/http://www.nationalarchives.govhttp://www.gov.uk/ipohttp:///reader/full/http://www.nationalarchives.govhttp://www.gov.uk/ipo

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    3/60

     

    ContentsIntroduction 1

    Key findings 2

    1. Research overview 6

    1.1 Background and objectives 6

    1.2 Research notes 8

    2. Cross-category overview 14

    2.1 Digital content consumption 14

    2.2 Levels of copyright infringement 19

    2.3 Consumer spend 28

    3. Attitudes towards digital activities

    and copyright infringement 32

    3.1 Motivations for general online activities 32

    3.2 Attitudes towards online content 36

    3.3 Motivations for lawful and unlawful behaviour 37

    3.4 Awareness of lawful/licensed services 43

    3.5 Confidence in knowing what is and isn’t legal online 44

    4. Technical appendix 46

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    4/60

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    5/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 1

    Introduction Thisreportdetailsthemainfindingsofthefifthwaveofa largescaleconsumertrackingstudy

    intotheextentofonlinecopyrightinfringement,aswellaswiderdigitalbehavioursandattitudes,

    amongpeopleaged12+intheUK.Thestudywascommissionedandfinanciallysupportedby

    theUKIntellectualPropertyOffice(IPO).Itisthefifthinaseriesofresearchwavesintendedto

    generatebenchmarksand timeseries relevant to theaccessand useofcopyrightmaterial

    online. It also outlines the background to the research and a detailed description of the

    methodologyemployed.

    Researching copyright infringement and digital behaviours is complex. The ways in which

    consumers access and share copyright material online change regularly, and infringement

    levels,inparticular,arenotoriouslydifficulttomeasure.Wehavegonetoextensivelengthsto

    find the best way of securing meaningful and accurate results for this survey, including

    commissioningamethodologicalstudyandanindependentpeerreview.Thesereportscanbe

    foundat:

    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/kantar.  

    pdf 

    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/peer.pdf  

    Ratherthanfocusingononeindustry,thestudylooksatsixmaintypesofonlinecontent–

    music,film,TVprogrammes,books,videogamesandcomputersoftware–andforeachof

    these assesses levels of infringement. These are then assessed within wider patterns of

    consumerbehaviourandcontentconsumption.

    ForthisfifthresearchwaverespondentsweresurveyedduringtheperiodofMarchtoMay2015

    andaskedabouttheirbehaviourduring“thepastthreemonths”.Referencetothefiguresfrom

    thepreviouswave(W4,coveringtheperiodMarchtoMay2013 1 )aremadewherestatistically

    significantchangeshaveoccurred.Insomecasesreferencesarealsomadetotheprevious

    waves.Inthisfifthwavewehavealsoconducted10qualitativeinterviewsamongstinfringers. The role of these interviews is to gain more indepth understanding of the motivations and

    attitudesforusingunlawfulservicesonline.Thedetailsabouttheseinterviewsarecoveredinthe

    technicalappendixsectionandthefindingsfromtheseinterviewsarestatedinrelevantsections

    inthisreport.

    Full details and results of previous waves can be found at hp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-

    research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-tracker/  (W1) and hp://stakeholders.ofcom. 

    org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw2/ (W2) hp:// 

    stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-

    trackerw3/ (W3) hp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/oci -

    wave4/ (W4).

    1

    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/kantarhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/kantar.pdfhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/peer.pdfhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-datahttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-tracker/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-tracker/http://stakeholders.ofcom/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw2/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw2/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw3/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw3/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw3/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/ocihttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/kantarhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/peer.pdfhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-datahttp://stakeholders.ofcom/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/ocihttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw3/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw3/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw3/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw2/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-trackerw2/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-tracker/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/copyright-infringement-tracker/http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/peer.pdfhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/kantar.pdfhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/telecoms-research/filesharing/kantar.pdf

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    6/60

    2 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    Keyfindings• This reportpresents the mainfindingsofthefifth wave(W5)of our consumertracking

    studyintoonlinecopyrightinfringement.Thekeyfindingsareasfollows:

    General digital content consumption

    • SixtytwopercentofUKinternetusersaged12+consumedatleastoneitemofonline

    content2(legallyorillegally)overthethreemonthperiodMarchMay2015.Fortytwoper

    centhaddownloadedcontent,and57%hadstreamedoraccessedcontent.Thestreaming

    activityhasgrownsignificantlyfrompreviouswaves.Thisisthehighestlevelofstreaming

    oraccessingcontentonlinewehaveseentodate.

    • Consumptionvariedacrosscontenttypes;music(35%)andTVprogrammes(34%)had

    thehighestlevelseitherdownloadedorstreamedonlineinthepastthreemonths,followed

    byfilms(22%),books(12%),computersoftware(12%)andvideogames(12%).Theoverall

    consumptionlevelhasrisenfromthepreviouswave,mainlydrivenbythegrowthinthefilm

    category.

    Payment

    • Overhalf(56%)ofthosewhoconsumedanytypeofcontentduringthepastthreemonths,

    paidforatleastsomeofit.Thisremainsstable,withnochangeinpaidandfreeconsumption

    ofcontentfromthepastwave(W4).

    • Justoveraquarter(27%)of12+UKinternetusersaccessedcontententirelyforfree,this

    proportionhasincreasedslightlyfromWave4(25%)butnotsignificantly.

    • TheseincreasesreflectslightlyhigherconsumptionlevelsduringW5comparedtoW4,and

    astableproportionof12+UKinternetusersconsumingamixofpaidandfreecontent

    (23%inW4and24%inW5).

    • Intermsofthosewhoaccessedindividualcontenttypes,therewasasmallbutsignificant

    decreaseintheproportionwhowatchedonlineTVprogrammesforfreefrom93%during

    W4,to87%inW5.Thisisdrivenbyanincreaseinthosewhopaidforallcontentfrom7%

    inwave4to15%inwave5.

    ‘Online content’ refers to any of six types – music, lms, TV programmes, computer soware, books and

    video games.

    2

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    7/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 3

    Levels of infringement

    • Weestimatethat18%,(equatingtoapproximately7.8million)ofUKinternetusersaged

    12+consumedatleastoneitemofonlinecontentillegallyoverthethreemonthperiod

    MarchMay2015.And6%ofthe12+UKinternetusershaveexclusivelyconsumedillegal

    content.TherehavebeensignificantchangesinthisproportionsinceW4.

    • Levelsofinfringementvariedsignificantlybycontenttype;9%consumedatleastsome

    musicillegallyoverthethreemonthperiod,while7%didsoforTVprogrammesand6%

    forfilms.Forcomputersoftware,videogamesandebooksthesefigureswere2%,2%and

    1%,respectively.

    • Ifinsteadoflookingat‘allinternetusersaged12+’weuseabaseof‘allinternetuserswho

    consumedcontentonlineoverthethreemonthperiod’,wefoundthat31%consumedat

    leastoneitemillegally.Furthermore,25%ofthosewhoconsumedfilm,and26%ofthose

    whoconsumedmusic,didsoillegally,whilethelowestincidenceof illegalconsumption

    wasamongonlinebookconsumers(10%).

    • Theproportionofallinternetusersaged12+whoconsumedcontentexclusivelylegally

    has decreased slightly for this wave from W4 from 40% in W4 to 39% in W5.

    Demographics

    • Across all content types, those who downloaded or streamed illegally were skewed

    towardsmales(59%),thoseunder35(66%),andABC1s(54%).Althoughtheageand

    social grade balances reflect those who consumed digital content online in general

    (whetherlawfullyornot),therewerenoticeabledifferencesfornoninfringers–whowere

    morelikelytobefemale(51%),over34(57%),andwereevenmorelikelytobeABC1

    (67%).

     Volumes of infringement

    • Musicwasbyfarthemostconsumedcontenttype,bothdigitally(343milliontracks)andphysically(96milliontracks)overthethreemonthperiod.Thereisanotableincreasein

    digitalvolumesfrom319millioninW4.Further,weestimatethat96millionmusictracks

    wereaccessedillegallyonline.Thiscategoryhasthehighestvolumesandinfringement

    acrossthecategoriestested.Despitethis,wedoseeadeclineinthelevelofinfringement

    sincelastwave.

    • FilmsandTVprogrammesaretheother categorieswheredigital volumeshaveshifted

    fromthepreviouswave.Filmsvolumeshavedeclinedfrom 81millioninwave4 to79

    millionthistime.HoweverthevolumeofTVprogrammeshasincreasedfrom98millionin

    2013to135millionthiswave.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    8/60

    4 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    • IntheTVprogrammecategoryinfringementlevelshaveraisedfrom12millionintheprevious

    waveto16millionthiswave.

    • Theebookcategoryhasthelowestlevelofinfringementwithonly6%ofcategoryusers

    accessingillegalcontent.

    Services used for consuming online content

    • Twentysixpercentofthosewhoconsumedanycontentillegallyclaimedtouse‘peerto-

    peer’(P2P)services,comparedto6%ofthosewhoonlyconsumedlegally.Thisisthe

    lowestlevelseensincethefirstwavein2012(itwas32%inW4).

    • Oftheindividualpeertopeerservicesused,uTorrenthadthehighestpenetration17%

    ofinfringersclaimedtohaveuseditinthepastthreemonths.

    • However, many licensed3 content services were also used by a significantly higher

    proportion of infringers thannoninfringers; for example: YouTube, Spotify, Netflix and

     Amazon.

    • Netflixuseincreasedsignificantlyamonginfringersfrom13%inwave4,to21%forW5,

    whistleSpotifyuseremainedstableamongthisgroup,at14%.Incontrast,theuseof

     Apple’sonlineproducts(iTunesorAppstore)hasdeclinedfrom26%(W4)to19%(W5).

    Spend

    • Theproportion of 12+individuals in theUK whospent moneyon at least oneof the

    categoriesweanalysedrangedfrom10%forsoftwareto44%forfilms.Averagequarterly

    spendrangedfrom£6.68forTVprogrammesto£20.28formusic.

    • For both music and films, spend on ‘other’ (which included cinema/concerts and

    merchandise)wassubstantiallyhigherthanspendonphysicalanddigitalcontent.

    • Forfourofthesixcategories, thosewhoconsumeda mixoflegaland illegalcontent

    claimedtospendmoreonthatparticularcontenttypeoverthethreemonthperiodthan

    thosewhoconsumedeither100%legallyor100%illegally.Theebookinfringerbasewas

    toolowtoanalyse.

    Note that unlawful acvies are possible on some of these services (such YouTube, iTunes, Google Play, etc).3

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    9/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 5

    Reasons for infringing

    • Themostcommonlycitedreasonsforinfringingwerebecauseitisfree(49%),convenient

    (43%) and quick (37%). Other reasons such as “can try before they buy” have fallen

    significantlyamongstallinfringersfrom27%inW4to17%inthiswave.Therearealso

    notabledeclinesinreasonssuchas“can’taffordtopay”and“thinklegalcontentistoo

    expensive”.

    • Theproportionclaimingtohaveconsumedcontentillegallybecausetheyhadalreadypaid

    toseeit(e.g.amovieinthecinemaorlivemusic)hasfallensignificantly,from14%inW4

    to7%inW5.

    What would make infringers stop?

    • The top three factors that infringers said wouldencourage them to stop included the

    availabilityofcheaperlegalservices(25%),ifeverythingtheywantedwasavailablelegally

    (21%),andifitwasclearerwhatislegalandwhatisnot(21%).Allfactorswerementioned

    byahigherproportionofthosewhoconsumedamixoflegalandillegalcontentthanby

    thosewhoconsumedcontentexclusivelyillegally.Only14%ofthosewhoconsumedillegal

    contentexclusivelystatedthatnothingwouldencouragethemtostop.

    • Fifteenpercentofinfringersindicatedthattheywouldbeputoff‘ifmyISPsentmealetter

    sayingtheywouldsuspendmyinternetaccess’,fallingto11%for‘ifmyISPsentmea

    letterinformingmemyaccounthadbeenusedtoinfringe’,and10%for‘ifmyISPsentme

    alettersayingtheywouldrestrictmyinternetspeed’.

    • ResponsestothethreatofISPletterswereallatlowerlevelsthantheyhadbeeninprevious

    waves;thesuspensionofinternetserviceinparticularhasfallenbyasmallproportions

    waveonwave(from22%inW1,18%inW2,16%inW3and14%inW4toitscurrentlevel

    of15%).

    Levels of consumer awareness in legal services and confidence about

    what is and is not legal online.

    • Lackofconfidenceaboutwhatisandisnotlegalonlineappearedmoreprevalentamong

    females(46%v33%ofmale)andC2DEs(43%v38%ofABC1),i.e.thoselesslikelyto

    participateinallformsofonlineactivity(legalandillegal).Alackofconfidencegenerally

    increasedwithagebeyond34,however1215yearolds(37%)showedsimilarlevelsof

    confidenceto3544yearolds(40%).

    • Theproportionofpeopleclaimingtobe‘notatallconfident’inwhatisandisnotlegal

    onlinehasincreasedslightly;from15%inW4to17%inW5.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    10/60

    6 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    1.Researchoverview

    1.1 Background and objectives

     The DigitalEconomyAct (DEA) 20104extendedIPO’sremittoincludenewdutiesrelatedto

    onlinecopyrightinfringement.TheDEArequiresIPOtoestablishacodesettingouttherulesfor

    ascheme,wherebyinternetserviceproviders(ISPs)mustnotifytheirsubscribersofallegations

    madebycopyrightownersthattheiraccounthasbeenusedtoinfringecopyright. Oncethe

    schemeisoperationalOfcommust reportto theSecretaryofState,onprogress inreducinglevelsofinfringement.

    InMay2011,theHargreavesReviewof IntellectualPropertyandGrowthrecommendedthat

    OfcomshouldnotwaituntiltheDEAschemewasupandrunningtobegingatheringdataand

    establishing benchmarks on online copyright infringement5. The Government adopted this

    recommendation and, asa result, the Intellectual Property Office agreed to fundOfcom to

    conduct research into online copyright infringement, inorder togather initial evidenceand

    trendsthatcouldbeusedtoassistpolicymaking.

    In2012,OfcomcommissionedKantarMediatoconductatrackingstudycoveringbehaviour

    andattitudestowardsbothlawfulandunlawfulonlineuseofcopyrightmaterialacrossseveralcontenttypes.ThisstudywasfundedbytheIPO.Howeverthisyear(2015)IPOcommissioned

    andmanagedthisprojectwithKantarMedia.

     Thetablebelowsetsoutthewideroverallaimsoftheresearch,alongwiththespecificresearch

    objectivesandassociatedmetrics:

    OverallAim ResearchObjective Metrics

    Establishthecurrentlevelof

    subscribers’useofinternet

    accessservicestoinfringe

    copyright.

    • Measureonlinecopyright

    infringementlevels(alongside

    lawfulactivity)amongUK

    consumers,andmonitorchangesonaquarterlybasis.

    • Whetheraccessed/

    downloaded/sharedfiles

    (ever,pastthreemonths)by

    contenttype.• Frequencypercontenttype.

    • Volumepercontenttype.

    • Proportionoftypepaidfor

    andfree.

    • Proportionoffilesbelievedto

    havebeenlegallyaccessed

    (fromwhichafigureforillegal

    filescanbederived).

    4 hp://www.legislaon.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/24/contents 

    5 hp://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview.htm  hp://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipresponse-full.pdf  

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/24/contentshttp://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview.htmhttp://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipresponse-full.pdfhttp://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipresponse-full.pdfhttp://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview.htmhttp://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/24/contents

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    11/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    7

    OverallAim ResearchObjective Metrics

    Describeandassessthesteps • Gaindeeperunderstandingof • Generalattitudes.

    takenbycopyrightowners“to attitudestowardscopyright • Keydriversofbehaviour.inform,andchangetheattitude infringement.

    • Whypeopledo/don’tof,membersofthepublicin • Monitorawarenessand infringe.relationtotheinfringementof

    copyright”and“toenable

    subscriberstoobtainlawful

    accesstocopyrightworks.”

    effectivenessofeducational

    campaigns.

    • Assessawarenessand

    attitudestowardsavailability

    • Whatwouldmakethem

    stop?

    • Awareness/useoflawful

    services.

    oflawfulalternatives. • Reasonswhydo/don’tuse

    lawfulservices.

    • Understandingofwhatis

    legal.

    Betterunderstandtherolethat • Measurespendonrecorded • Currentspendonrelevant

    pricingplays inthe lawfuland anddigital mediatoanalyse material.

    unlawfulaccessofonline potentialimpactofunlawful • Willingnesstopaymodelling.content. filesharingonpurchaseof

    relatedcontent(positiveand

    negative).

    • Explorewillingnesstopayandoptimumpricingfor

    differentcontenttypes.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    12/60

    8 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    1.2 Research notes

    Content types and activities assessed

    Withinthisstudywesoughttoprovidemeasurementsforsixcorecontenttypesofinterest:

    Music Films Programmes ComputerSoftware

    Books VideoGames

     Thequestionsweaskedwereprimarilyfocusedaroundthefollowingonlineactivities,explained

    toeachrespondentasfollows:

    • Streamedoraccessed:Bythiswemeanthatyouviewed,listenedtoorplayedcontent

    directly through the internet without downloading a copy. For example, watching TV

    programmesonBBCiPlayerorlisteningtomusicthroughservicessuchasSpotify.

    • Downloaded:Bythiswemeanthatyoutransferredacopyofthefiletoyourdevice.For

    example,downloadingamusictracktoyourcomputerthroughiTunesorAmazon.

    • Shared:Bythiswemeanthatyoumadethefilepubliclyavailable,orsentoruploadedit

    onlineforsomeoneelsetodownloadorstream/access.Forexample,sharingfilesonyour

    computerthroughanonlineservice.Thisdoesnotincludesharinglinksonline.

     These categories all relate towhatwe term ‘digital’content/files.However,certainmetrics in

    thisreportalsoincorporateconsumerspendattributableto‘physical’formats(e.g.CDs,DVDs,

    physicalbooks,gamesandcartridges)tohelplocatetheconsumptionofdigitalcontentinits

    widercontext.

    For most of the content types there are several elements that had the potential to causeconfusionandtherebydistortthefiguresifmisinterpretedbytherespondent.Forexample,there

    isafinelinebetweenmusictracksandmusicvideos,andthereisadistinctdifference(interms

    ofnumberofdigitalfiles)betweensinglesandalbums.Similarly,forcomputersoftwareand

    videogamespeoplemayconsiderupdatesandpatchesasproductsinthemselves.Therefore,

    weattemptedtobeascleartorespondentsaspossibleintermsofwhattheyshouldincludein

    thedefinition.Theseareasfollows:

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    13/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    9

    Category Definitionforrespondent

    Music Musictracksoralbums(excludingonlineradiostations) 6

    Films Films(fulllength)

    TVprogrammes  TVprogrammes

    ComputersoftwareComputersoftware(excludingmobilephoneapps,andpatches/

    upgradestosoftwarealreadyowned)

    Books ebooks

     Videogames  Videogames(excludingpatchesandupgrades)

    6Key Metrics

    With respect to assessing levels of copyright infringement for each content category, the

    approachis consistentthroughout thesurvey;wefilter down from generalonline behaviour

    towardsthesensitivetopicofinfringement.Withineachcategory,weoutlinekeymetricsattwo

    levels:

    1. Respondentlevel:Forexample,thetotalnumberandproportionoftheUKpopulation

    whoundertookanactivitysuchasdownloadingmusic.

    2. Volumelevel:Forexample,thenumberofmusictracksdownloadedinthepastthree

    months,orthenumberofmusictrackslegallyobtained.

    ‘Musicvideos’and‘shortvideoclips’wereaskedseparatelyforthe‘everdone’and‘doneinpastthreemonths’

    questionstoaidwiththedistinctions.

    6

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    14/60

    10 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

     Thekeymetricsthroughoutthisreportaresummarisedinthefollowingtable:7

     Topic RespondentLevel VolumeLevel

     Assessinglevelsofcopyrightinfringement

    General 1.Everdone

    behaviour 2.Doneinthepastthreemonths 7

    3.Frequency

    4.Medianvolumes(pastthreemonths)amongthosewhohavedone

    activity

    Payment Proportionofthepopulationwhofitintothefollowingderivedgroups

    intermsofvolumeofcontentconsumedinthepastthreemonths:

    1.100%paid

    2.Mixofpaidandfree

    3.100%free

    4.Anyfree(combinationof2+3)

    5.100%alreadyownedinphysicalformat

    6.Anyalreadyownedinphysicalformat

    7.Nonealreadyownedinphysicalformat

    8.100%previouslydownloadedforfree(%ofpaidacquisitions

    acrossformats)

    9.Anypreviouslydownloadedforfree

    10.Nonepreviouslydownloadedforfree

     Aswellastheproportionsofthosewhohavedonetheactivityinthe

    pastthreemonths,metrics1to4arealsoreportedamongthetotal

    12+UKinternetpopulation,andincludemedianvolumes.Metrics5

    to10includemeanvolumes 8.

    Paidandfree

    proportionsof

    totalvolume

    (incorporating

    physicalformat

    whererelevant)

    Legality Proportionofthepopulationwhofitintothefollowingderivedgroups

    intermsofvolumeofcontentconsumedinthepastthreemonths:

    1.100%legal2.Mixoflegalandillegal

    3.100%illegal

    4.Anyillegal(combinationof2+3)

     Aswellastheproportionsofthosewhohavedonetheactivityinthe

    pastthreemonths,theabovemetrics1to4arealsoreported

    amongthetotal12+UKinternetpopulationandincludemedian

    volumes.

    Legalandillegal

    proportionsof

    totalvolume

    (incorporating

    physicalformat

    whererelevant)

    7 Thepastthreemonthswasdecideduponastheprimarytimebasedmetricforthisstudy.Althoughthismighthaverepercussionsregardingrespondents’abilitytorecollectpastbehaviouraccurately,itwaschosenfortworeasons

    1)ittiesinwiththefuturequarterlyDEAreportingrequirement,and2)itis intendedtoavoidbiasinthedata

    causedbyseasonality(especiallyregardingtheChristmasperiod).

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    15/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    11

     Assessingconsumerspendoncategoriesandpricesensitivity

    Spend Proportionofpopulationwhohavespentanything(andaverage

    spendinthepastthreemonths)ondigitalsubscriptions,

    individualdigitaldownloads,physicalformatsandotherrelated

    areassuchasgigsorcinema.

     Totalvolumesand

    proportionsofoverall

    spend

    Price

    sensitivity

    Willingnesstopay(music,filmsandebooksonly)

    Forconsumingindividualfilesviaadownloadservice

    Forasubscriptionservice(monthlycharge)

    Subgroup analysis 8

    Foreachcategorythereportdetailsthemainfindings,followedbysignificantdifferencesof

    interest(at the 95% level9, unless indicatedotherwise) comparedto W4 results,among the

    followinggroups:

    Category Subgroups

    Gender Male,Female

     Age 1215,1624,2535,3544,4554,55+

    Socioeconomicgroup(16+only) ABC1,C2DE

    Presenceofchildreninthehousehold Yes(includingunder15yearoldrespondents),No

    Trends

     Throughout the report reference to the figures from the previous waves are made where

    significantchangeshaveoccurredintheresults.Againthisisassessedatthe95%level(unless

    otherwisestated)andishighlightedinthe tablesor chartswherepossible.Wheresignificant

    changeshaveoccurred,anattemptismadetoexplainwhytheymayhaveoccurred;insome

    casesthismightbepartlyattributedtochangesinthesurveydesign(suchasquestionwording).

    8 SeeTHELIMITATIONSOFCLAIMEDBEHAVIOURANDDATARECONCILIATIONonpage12.

    9 In statistics,a numberthatexpressestheprobabilitythattheresultof agivenexperimentorstudycouldhave

    occurredpurelyby chance.This numbercanbe amarginof error(“Theresultsof this publicopinion pollare

    accurate tofive percent”), orit can indicate a confidence level (“If this experimentwererepeated,there is aprobability ofninetyfivepercentthat ourconclusionswouldbe substantiated”).Source:DictionaryofCultural

    Literacy.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    16/60

    12 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    The limitations of claimed behaviour and data reconciliation

    Consumerresearchprovidesonesourceofinsightintotheextentandpatternsofonlinecontent

    consumption.OtherpotentialsourcesincludeanalysisofISPinternettraffic,industrysalesand

    revenuedata,internetaudienceanalysisanddirectmeasurementofonlineactivity(forexample,

    bymonitoringactivityonfilesharingnetworks).Ontheirown,noneofthesesourcespresentsa

    completepictureofthemarket,andeachhasstrengthsandlimitations.

    Datain thisreport (particularly consumption volumesandconsumerspend) arenot directly

    comparabletopublishedindustrysalesdata.Widevariationsinnotionallysimilarfiguresshould

    beexpectedformanyreasons,including:

    • Differencesinmethodologicalapproach

    • Extentofmarketcoverage

    • Seasonalityandtimingofresearch

    • InclusionorotherwiseofVAT

    • Differencesbetweenconsumerspendandsalesreceipts

    • Inclusionofsalesofsecondhandmaterial

    Itisalsoparticularlyimportanttonotethatfiguresinthisreportarebasedonthe‘claimed’

    numberscollectedfromarandomsampleofpeopleinthissurvey.Thesedatawerethengrossed

    uptoreflecttheUK12+population.Therewasawidevarianceinthenumbersandthisreflects

    thebehaviourindicatedbyasubsectionoftheUKpopulation12+withinthetimeperiodsasked

    about.

    Furthermore,questionsonunlawfulbehaviourhaveaparticularrelianceonhonesty,which

    is also likely to affect accuracy to some degree i.e. result in underclaim for unlawful

    behaviour.Wehavegonetosignificantlengthstoensurethathonestywasencouraged(to

    ensure that the data collected were asaccurate aspossible) byusing indirectlinesof

    questioningwhencalculatingunlawfulactivity.Thesemeasuresarediscussedinmoredetail

    inthetechnicalappendix(Section4)ofthisreport.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    17/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 13

    Reporting averages and the issue of outliers

    When reporting on average volumes consumed (or shared) certain metrics are reported

    differentlyforthisstudy.Thetwotypesofaveragesusedare:

     Themedianthemiddlevalueinasamplesortedintoascendingorder.

     Themeanthegrandtotaldividedbythenumberofdatapoints.

    Forcoremetricscoveringaveragevolumesof filesdownloaded/streamed,paidfor/obtained

    free,andobtainedlegally/illegallyinthepastthreemonths,wereportonlyonmedians.The

    reason for this isthatdue tothenatureofonlinebehaviours,and the continuousscale for

    responses to these questions, the resultant mean scores are highly influenced by a few

    respondentswithhighlevelsofactivity.Asaresultthemeanvolumesarenoticeablyvolatilefrom

    onewavetothenextforallcontenttypescovered,reducingtheconfidencewithwhichwecan

    infer trends for these figures. Alternatively, if we were to exclude outliers from the mean

    calculationsthiswouldignorevaliddatafrompossibleenthusiastsandhencecauseadifferent

    issue.Themedian(middlenumber),ontheotherhand,hasprovedtobemuchmorestablefor

    thesemetrics.

    Forthetwometricscoveringphysicalownershipofdigitalcontentconsumed,andtheprevious

    freeconsumptionofpaidforcontent,wereverttothestandardmean.Thereasonforthis isthat,incontrasttotheabove,themeanhasremainedstablefromonewavetothenextfor

    thesemetrics. Furthermore, the median iszero inall cases, as the majorityofthosewho

    consumedcontentonlineinthepastthreemonthsdidn’talreadyownanyinphysicalformat,or

    previouslyconsumepaidforcontentforfree.Therefore,thereislittlevalueinreportingonthe

    medianhere.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    18/60

    14 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    2.Cross-categoryoverview

    2.1 Digital content consumption

     This section provides a summary of the key metrics and findings from the current wave of

    research(asdescribedinSection1.2).

    2.1.1 Digital behaviour among internet users aged 12+ across all

    content types

     The following table outlines the proportion of internet users aged 12+ who downloaded,

    streamed/accessed,orsharedcontentforeachofthesixcontenttypes.The‘any’columnisan

    aggregationacrossallofthecontenttypes(forexample,ifsomeonedownloadedandstreamed

    bothmusicandfilmstheywouldbecountedonlyoncewithintheoverallproportion):

    Table 2.1.1a: Digital behaviour among internet users aged 12+

    – all content types

    Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books VideoGames  Any

    Sig.increase(fromW4)

    Sig.decrease(fromW4)

    Base:allinternetusers12+ 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552

    Download Everdone 34% 14% 15% 15% 15% 13% 51%

    Past3

    months

    24% 9% 9% 9% 11% 8% 42%

    Streamor

    access

    Everdone 37% 27% 40% 12% 9% 12%

    64%

    Past3

    months

    27% 20% 32% 5% 6% 8% 56%

    Share Everdone 8% 3% 3% 2% 1% 3% 18%Past3

    months

    6% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 13%

    Downloador

    Stream/

    accessi.e.

    Consumed

    Everdone 46% 30% 42% 20% 18% 17% 69%

    Past3

    months

    35% 22% 34% 12% 12% 11% 62%

    Download,

    Stream/

    access,or

    Share

    Everdone 46% 31% 43% 20% 18% 18% 69%

    Past3

    months

    35% 22% 34% 12% 13% 12% 62%

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    19/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    15

    • Therehasbeenanoverallincreaseinonlineactivityto69%sincelastwaveinMarMay

    ’13.Thisriseismainlydrivenbythegrowthinstreamingactivities(64%).

    • Sharingofcontenthasalsoincreasedandismainlyledbygrowthinsharingofmusic,films

    andTVprogrammecontentcomparedtothepastwave.Howeversharingremainsaniche

    activity.

    • Musiccontinuestobethemostdownloadedcontenttypeofthesixweexplored;34%of

    internetusershadeverdownloadedmusic,andaquarterhaddonesointhepastthree

    months.

    • TVprogrammeswerethemostcommonlystreamedtype,with40%havingdonesoever,

    and32%havingdonesointhepastthreemonths.

    • Theonlineconsumptionlevelofsmallercontentcategoriessuchascomputersoftware,

    ebooks and video games has remained broadly stable for streaming and accessing/

    sharingcontent. Whereasebooks downloaded in thepast three months hasdropped

    significantlycomparedtothepreviouswave.

     The followingtable outlinesthemedianvolumesoffilesdownloaded,streamed/accessedor

    sharedinthepastthreemonths(amongthosewhohaddoneeachactivity).The‘any’column

    showsaggregationsacrossallthreeactivities:

    Table 2.1.1b: Median number of files among 12+ internet users who

    consumed content (past three months)

    Sig.increase

    (fromW4)

    Sig.decrease

    (fromW4)

    Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books VideoGames  Any

    Base* 1247 470 489 437 537 415 2013

    Downloaded 10 3 5 2 4 2 9

    Base* 1425 1014 1590 320 287 420 2492

    Streamed/

    accessed

    20 5 7 2 3 3 15

    Base* 311 104 96** 78** 55** 102 454

    Shared 3 2 2 2 2 2 3

    Base* 1808 1122 1693 578 613 618 2843

    Downloadedor

    Streamed/

    accessedi.e.

    Consumed

    20 5 9 3 5 4 20

    *Allbasesareamongthosewhohaddoneeachactivityinthepastthreemonths

    **Caution:baseslowerthan100.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    20/60

    16 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    • Generally, the median figureshave remained relativelystableacross the content types

    since W4. The exception was TV programmes, where the number of streamed TV

    programmesincreasedsignificantlysincewave4,from5to7.EventhedownloadingofTV

    programmes increased from3 programmes inW4 to5 programmes incurrentwave.

    Similarly themedian number of TV programmes consumedoverall (i.e. includingboth

    streaminganddownloading)hasalsoincreased.ThisgaveTVprogrammesthehighest

    medianconsumptionlevelsince2012.

    2.1.2 Payment groups

    Wecategorisedpeopleaccordingtotheproportionofdigitalcontentthattheyclaimedtohave

    paidfor;werefertothesecategoriesas‘paymentgroups’.

     Thefollowingtableshowstheincidencesforeachpaymentgroupintermsofcontentaccessed

    inthepastthreemonths,acrosstwodifferentbases:

    • Base1allwhodownloadedorstreamed/accessedeachcontenttypeinthepastthree

    months

    • Base2allinternetusersaged12+

    Wehaveincludedthissecondbasebecausetheproportionofpeopleactiveineachcategory

    variesbetweencontenttypes;lookingatpaymentcategoriesacrossthe12+internetuniverse

    allowsustomakecomparisonsbetweenthem.

    Table 2.1.2: Payment groups – proportion who paid to consume content

    or did so for free (past three months)

    Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books V ideoGames  Any

    Sig.increase(fromW4)

    Sig.decrease(fromW4)

    Base1allwhoconsumed 1808 1120 1693 577 613 615 2834

    100%Paid 27% 35% 15% 24% 47% 36% 13%

    MixofPaidandFree 23% 17% 11% 17% 22% 24% 43%

    100%Free 50% 48% 76% 59% 31% 40% 44%

     ANYPAID 50% 52% 25% 41% 69% 60% 56%

     ANYFREE 73% 65% 87% 76% 53% 64% 87%

    Base212+internetusers 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552

    100%Paid 9% 8% 5% 3% 6% 4% 5%

    MixofPaidandFree 8% 4% 3% 2% 3% 3% 24%

    100%Free 17% 11% 26% 7% 4% 5% 27%

     ANYPAID 17% 12% 8% 5% 9% 7% 29%

     ANYFREE 25% 15% 29% 9% 7% 8% 51%

    Base1:Allwhohavedownloadedorstreamed/accessedtypesofcontentinthepastthreemonths

    Base2:Allinternetusers(aged12+)

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    21/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    17

    • TVprogrammeshadthehighestincidenceoffreeconsumptionacrossthecontenttypes,

    equatingtolittlelessthanathirdofthe12+internetpopulation.Thefreeconsumptionof

     TVprogrammeshasdeclinedsignificantlyfromthepreviouswave(from32%W4to29%

    W5).However,thisdeclineisoffsetbytheincreaseinpaidTVprogrammesconsumption.

     AquarterofthosewhoaccessTVprogrammesonlinehavepaidforthecontent.Thishas

    increasedfrom15%(W4)to25%inthiswave.

    • Acrossallcontenttypes,andamongallinternetusersaged12+,the‘mixofpaidandfree’

    groupremainedstableandtothesamelevelsasseeninW2(23%).Therewasasmall

    upliftinthepercentagewhoconsumedcontentforfree(from48%to51%).However,this

    isnotsignificant.TheupliftinfreecontentwasmainlydrivenbyFilmscategory.

    • Ofthosewhodownloadedoraccessedmusiccontentofanytypeduringthepastthree

    months,thegreatmajority(73%)consumedatleastsomeofitforfree10.

    • AllcontenttypesexceptTVprogrammeshaveseennosignificantfluctuationsover the

    timeperiod.

    • Moreebookconsumerspaidforsomecontent(69%)andforalloftheircontent(47%)

    thanconsumersofanyothercontenttype.

    2.1.3 Existing ownership, and free access to digital contentbefore purchasing

    • Thefollowingtabledisplaysasummaryofkeymetricsaboutpriorownershipinphysical

    formatofcontentconsumedonlineinthepastthreemonths.

    Table 2.1.3a: – Prior physical ownership of content consumed in the past

    three months

    Sig.increase(fromW4)

    Sig.decrease(fromW4) Music Films Programmes ComputerSoftware

    Books VideoGames  Any

    Base* 1808 1122 1693 577 613 615 2843

    100%ownedinphysicalformat 4% 3% 2% 6% 2% 6% 2%

     Anyownedinphysicalformat 26% 19% 10% 17% 14% 23% 30%

    Noneownedinphysicalformat 70% 78% 88% 77% 84% 71% 68%

    Meannumber 12 1 3 2 1 3 12

    *Allbasesareamongthosewhohaddoneeachactivityinthepastthreemonths

    *Meannumberistheaveragenumberofitemsphysicallyownedpriortopurchasingcontentonlineinthepastthree

    months

    10  Note that ‘free’ does not necessarily mean that the content was consumed ‘illegally’.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    22/60

    18 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    • Physicalownershipofcontentconsumedonlineinthepastthreemonthshassignificantly

    changedonlyintheMusiccategorysinceW4. Littlemorethanaquarter(27%)ofthose

    whoconsumedanycontentinthepastthreemonths,alreadyownedsomeofitinphysical

    format.

    • Consumersofmusic(26%)andvideogames(23%)weremostlikelytoclaimownershipof

    physicalcopiesofatleastsomeofthecontenttheyhadconsumedonlineinthepastthree

    months.

    • Theoverallmajorityofconsumers(68%)donotowncontentinanyphysicalformatbefore

    consumingitonline.

     Thefol lowingtableshowstheproportionofpeoplewhoclaimedtohavepreviouslyconsumed

    contentonlineforfreewhichtheywentontopayfor(ineitherdigitalorphysicalformat).

    Table 2.1.3b: Consuming online content for free before purchasing in the

    past three months

    Sig.increase(fromW4)

    Sig.decrease(fromW4)Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books VideoGames  Any

    Base* 1523 1520 1054 668 2046 1018 5192

    100%previouslyconsumedfor

    free

    14% 9% 20% 24% 7% 13% 2%

     Anypreviouslyconsumedforfree 34% 20% 32% 42% 14% 29% 16%

    Nonepreviouslyconsumedfor

    free

    66% 80% 68% 58% 86% 71% 84%

    Meannumber 12 1 3 2 1 1 5

    *Allbasesareamongthosewhohadpaidfortypesofcontent(physicalordigital)inthepastthreemonths

    *Meannumberistheaveragenumberofitemsconsumedonlineforfreebeforepurchasinginthepastthreemonths

    • The percentage of those who hadpreviously consumed paidfor content for free has

    remainedstableacrossallthecategorieswithnosignificantchangessincepreviouswave.

    • Acrossthecontenttypes,themajority(84%)ofthecontentthatispaidforonlinewasnot

    consumedforfreepreviously.

    • Thepercentageofthosewhoconsumed100%ofthecontentforfreebeforepurchasing

    was highest for the computer softwarecategory (24%)and TVprogrammescategory

    (20%).

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    23/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    19

    2.2 Levels of copyright infringement

    2.2.1 Legality groups

     Aswiththepaymentgroupmetricsoutl inedinSection2.1.2,wecancreate‘legality’groupsby

    assessingtheproportionofonlinecontenttheyeachconsumedlegally11:

    Table 2.2.1a: Legality groups – proportion who consumed content legally/

    illegally (past three months)

     Sig. increase (from W4)

    Sig. decrease (from W4) Music Films Programmes ComputerSoftware

    Books VideoGames  Any

    Base 1 - all who consumed 1808 1122 1693 578 613 618 2843

    100% legal 74% 75% 79% 80% 89% 82% 69%

    Mix of legal and illegal 11% 9% 7% 7% 4% 8% 22%

    100% illegal 15% 16% 14% 14% 6% 10% 10%

    ANY ILLEGAL 26% 25% 21% 20% 11% 18% 31%

    Base 2 - 12+ internet users 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552 4552

    100% legal 26% 17% 27% 10% 11% 9% 39%Mix of legal and illegal 4% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 12%

    100% illegal 5% 4% 5% 2% 1% 1% 6%

    ANY ILLEGAL 9% 6% 7% 2% 1% 2% 18%

    Base1:Allwhohavedownloadedorstreamed/accessedtypesofcontentinthepastthreemonths

    Base2:Allinternetusers(aged12+)

    • Overall,theproportionof12+internetuserswhoinfringedremainedsimilartoW4,at18%.

    However, amongany content consumers therehas been a significant increase in the

    proportionofconsumerswhoareaccessing100%illegalcontentfrom8%(W4)to10%for

    thecurrentwave.

    • Thegrowth in accesstoillegalcontentamong thecategory usersis mainly driven by

    accesstoillegalcontentintheTVprogrammescategory(from11%inW4to14%forW5).

    • Ontheotherhand,therehasbeenasignificantdeclineinillegalcontentaccessinthefilms

    categoryfromthepreviouswave(from21%inW4to16%forthecurrentwave).

    • Intheothercategoriestherearenomajorchangesinthelevelofinfringement.Wecontinue

    toseehighestlevelofinfringementinthemusiccategory(26%),closelyfollowedbythe

    filmscategorywith25%ofanyillegalcontent.

    11 We derived gures for illegal les by looking at dierences between claimed total number of les with

    claimed number of les obtained ‘legally’ in the past three months. Illegal streaming acvity is dened as

    content that has not been accessed or streamed from legal sources

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    24/60

    20 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

     Table2.2.1bshowsthedemographicprofileof‘anyillegal’(infringers)versus‘100%legal’(non-

    infringers):

    Table 2.2.1b: Demographic profiles of infringers versus non-infringers12

    Base

     Allcontentconsumers Anyillegal

    (Infringers)

    100%legal

    (noninfringers)

    2843 762 1171

    Gender Male 53% 59% 49%

    Female 47% 41% 51%

     Age 1215 9% 10% 8%

    1634 45% 56% 35%

    3554 32% 25% 35%

    55+ 14% 10% 22%

    Socioeconomic

    group12 ABC1 67% 54% 67%

    C2DE 33% 46% 33%

    Base:Allwhohavedownloadedorstreamed/accessedanycontenttypeinthepastthreemonths(2843)

    • Across all content types, those who downloaded or streamed illegally were skewed

    towardsmales(59%)andthoseunder35(66%).Noninfringersweremorelikelytobe

    female(51%),over34(57%),andABC1(67%)thaninfringers.

    • We also looked at thepenetrationlevels amongdemographicgroups andwe noticed

    higherlevelofinfringementamonglowerSECC2DE(16%)comparedtoSECABC1(7%).

     Thefollowingtableshowsthemediannumberofitemsdownloadedorstreamedillegally,split

    outbythelegalitygroups:

    Table 2.2.1c: Legality groups – median content items consumed illegally

    in the past three months

    Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books VideoGames  Any

    Base: 457 341 337 123 72* 114 762

    100%illegal 11 3 4 2 ** 2 6

     Anyillegal(Infringers) 20 6 8 4 6 3 21

    Base:Allwhohavedownloadedorstreamedtypesofcontentillegallyinthepastthreemonths

    *Cautionlowbase(under100).**Basestoosmalltoanalysefurther(under50)

    12 Socioeconomicgroupisnotincludedfor1215yearolds,sothisprofileisamong16+yearolds.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    25/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    21

    • Acrossallcontent types the median number of files downloaded or streamed illegally

    amongthosewhohaddonesowastwentyone.

    • Medianvolumeswerehighestformusic(20tracks),whilecomputersoftwareandvideo

    gameswerelowest(fourandthree).

     Thefol lowingtableshowstheincidenceofservicesusedinthepastthreemonthstoconsume

    orshareanytypeofcontent.Itcomparesinfringers(‘anyillegal’)withnoninfringers(‘100%

    legal’).

    Table 2.2.1d: Use of services for consuming or sharing content in the14past three months13

    Sig.increase(fromW4)

    Sig.decrease(fromW4)

     Allwhoconsumed

    orsharedcontent

    inpast3months

     Anyillegal

    (infringers)

    100%legal

    (noninfringers)

    Base 2864 762 1171

     YouTube 50% 63% 41%

    BBCiPlayer 37%   33%  39% 

     Amazon/Amazonmp3/Kindle 35% 27% 29%

    iTunes/AppStore/iBookstore/

     AppleStore 23% 19% 13%

    ITVPlayer 18% 16% 18%

    4OD 17% 17% 15%

    Facebook 22% 30% 14%

    Google(SearchEngine) 19% 26% 17%

    Spotify 16% 14% 11%

    Email 13% 18% 9%

    Netflix 24%   21%   14%

    Lovefilm 4% 3% 2%

    SkyGo 9% 8% 7%

    uTorrent 7% 17% 3%

    Demand5 7% 6% 7%

    GooglePlay/AndroidMarketplace 8% 9% 4%

    Microsoft 6% 5% 5%

    BitTorrentsoftware 4% 10% 1%

    Peer-to-peer(NET)13 12% 26% 6%

    Cyberlockers(NET)14 4% 9% 1%

    Meannumberofservicesused 4.0 5.6 3.4

    Base:Allwhohavedownloaded,streamed/accessedorsharedanyofthesixcontenttypesinthepastthreemonths

    (2864)

    13 Peertopeer(net)comprisesBittorrentsoftware,uTorrent,PirateBay,Isohunt,Limewire,eDonkey/eMule,Gnutel la,

    KickAssTorrents,Torrentz,andSopcast.

    14 CyberlockerscomprisesRapidshare,MediaFireandYouSendit.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    26/60

    22 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    • Halfofthosewhoconsumedorsharedanycontentonlineinthepastthreemonthsused

     YouTube,followedbytheBBCiPlayerandAmazonservices.BBCiPlayerserviceusage

    hasdeclinedfrom44% to37%sincethelastwavein2013but remainsanimportant

    source,particularlyforthenoninfringers.

    • Netflixservicesseethemostsignificantincreaseinusageamongallthegroups.Aquarter

    ofthosewhoconsumedorsharedanycontentonlineinthepastthreemonthsusedthis

    service.Furthermore,nearlyaquarterofinfringers(21%)usedNetflix.

    • UseofPeer2Peer(P2P)washigheramonginfringers(26%),butthelevelshavedropped

    sincethelastwaveanditiscurrentlyatthelowestlevelseensofar(itwas32%inW4).

    • uTorrentwasstillthemostused‘unlicensed’service,asithasbeensinceW117%of

    infringersclaimedtohaveuseditinthepastthreemonths.‘Cyberlockers’wereusedby

    9%ofinfringers.Therehavebeennochangesinthelevelof‘unlicensed’serviceusage

    amongstinfringers.

    • Those who infringed used 5.6 services on average, compared to 3.4 for those who

    consumed100%legally.

    2.2.2 Qualitative findings about the servicesused across categories

     Thefollowingfindingsarefromthequalitativeindepthinterviewswhereweaskedrespondents

    aboutthereasonsforusingvariousofficialandunofficialservicesacrosscategories.

    Use of official services in Music, Films and TV programmes categories:

     YouTubewasapopularsourceusedamongst infringersinterviewedinthequalitativephase. It

    isoften the ‘go to’ source for discoveringmusic.The ads that appear onthischannelare

    percievedtobeannoyingbutconsumersarewillingtouseitbecauseitisfree.YouTubeisalso

    used to find old TVseries’ whichare oftenunavailableonothersources. There were also

    references to use for accessing entire films though these tended not to benew releases.

    ConsumersseelittleriskinviewingcontentonYouTube,eventhatwhichmaybeillegalasthey

    consideritisYouTube’sresponsibilitytonotpublishanyunofficialcontent.

     This is illustratedbyone respondentswho said “I prefer streaming things on Youtube rather

    than those illegal downloads. If it’s on Youtube then it’s obviously going to be strict. Finding

    Nemo is on there. Something like that would be taken off if it was illegal.” (Responsefromafemalerespondentbetweentheages2529years)

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    27/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 23

     AswehaveseenfromthequantitativefindingsInfringersareawareofofficialsourceslikeNetflix

    butperceiveittohavealimitedcontentarchivecomparedtootherunofficialsources.Itisseen

    toofferonlyselectedseriesofsomeshows.TheUSAversionisperceivedashavingabroader

    selection.Tosomeextentthereisareluctancetosubscribetotheservicewhencontentisfreely

    availableonotheronlinestreamingservices.“New stuff I don’t watch through Netflix, because

     you have to wait. I can just stream it.” (Responsefromamalerespondentfromtheagegroup

    1820years)

    Spotify was the other popular streaming service discussed in the interviews. Consumers

    (infringers)preferredusingthefreeversionofthisserviceeventhoughtheyfindtheadvertsto

    beannoyingandfeelithasrestrictedfeatures.However,again,theyarewillingtousethefreeversionoverthepaidsubscriptionoption.Theyalsoconsiderthisserviceusefulasameansto

    trialtracksandalbums.

     Theinfringersalsoreferedtodownloaderappsthatcanbeusedinsmartphonesandtabletslike

    iTunes,AmazonmusicandGoogleplay.Howevertheseappswereonlyusedoccasionally.

    ForTVprogrammes,consumersarealsousingTVCatchupappstowatchliveTVonvarious

    devices.Thereappearedto besomeconfusionaroundthelegalityofthisservice.However,

    thoseinfringerswespoketopreferedusingthisserviceasitcircumventstheeffortofusing

    individualbroadcasterapps.

    Use of unofficial services in Music, Films and TV programmes categories:

    UnofficialservicessuchasuTorrent,BitTorrentetcareusedfordownloadingmusictracks,films

    orTVprogrammesastheyarecostfreeandalargevolumeofcontentcanbedownloaded

    using these services. They are also seen as providing a wide choice including unreleased

    content. Thereare timeswhenuncertaintyofthequalityandeven thecontentthatisbeing

    downloadedbecomeanissue.Downloadsfromtheseservicescanbeslowandneedalotof

    planning. Given that the content is generally seen to be freely available for downloading,

    infringersgetfrustratedwhenunofficialsitesareblocked.

     There were other unofficial streaming services such as Couch Tuner,Show Box, Coke andPopcornwhichinfringersclaimedtouse,generallyincreasinglytostreamfilmandTVcontent.

     Theseservicestendedtobemorepopularwithyoungerinfringers.Theyconsidertheseservices

    forpersonalviewinginordertocircumventhouseholdpreferencesandoftenusethemontheir

    personaldevices.Theseserviceswereregardedasprovidinganacceptablequalityofcontent

    forfree.Thesestreamingserviceswerealsoseenasfacilitatingbingeviewingastheyprovide

    vastarchivesthatarenotboundtosinglebroadcastersorprovidersinthesamewayaslegal

    alternatives are. Infringers also tend to use these services to view various shows that are

    broadcastonlyintheUSAandsoarenotavailable,orhavenotyetbeenreleasedintheUK.

    SuchunofficialservicesareperceivedtobridgethegapbetweencinemareleasesandtheDVD/

    PayTVwindow.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    28/60

    24 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    2.2.3 Content consumption volumes

    Whilstmetricsoutlinedsofarhavefocusedonresultsatanindividualrespondentlevel,the

    followingtableoutlinestotalconsumptionvolumeestimatesforeachofthecontenttypes(inthe

    pastthreemonths,roundedtothenearestmillionineachcase15 ).

     Thevolumesarecalculatedusingthemedianscoresaspertherationalesetoutpreviouslyin

    theresearchnotessection.

    Table 2.2.2: Volume of content consumed

     Volumesareinmillions  Total Physicalformat Digitalformat

    Music

     Volume 440m 96m 343m

    %oftotal 57% 22% 78%

    Films

     Volume 79m 22m 56m

    %oftotal 10% 28% 72%

    Programmes

     Volume 135m 15m 119m

    %oftotal 17% 12% 88%

    Computer

    Software

     Volume 18m 4m 13m

    %oftotal 2% 26% 74%

    Books

     Volume 77m 50m 26m

    %oftotal 10% 65% 35%

     VideoGames

     Volume 21m 7m 13m

    %oftotal 3% 35% 65%

    Total 772m 197m 574m

    15  Due to rounding (to the nearest million), not all gures e.g. paid + free will add up to the total exactly.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    29/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 25

    • Digital format consumption contributes to nearly three quarters of the overall volume

    (574m).Thedigital volumeshaveincreased bynearly thirteenpercentage points since

    2013.

    • The majorityof content isconsumed indigitalformat across all categories,except for

    ebookswherephysicalcontent(i.e.traditionalbooks)outweighsdigital.

    • Musicwasbyfarthemostconsumedcontenttype,bothdigitally(343milliontracks)and

    physically(96milliontracks)overthethreemonthperiod.Thiswaslargelydrivenbythe

    fact that weassessed individual tracks, not albums. There isa notable shift indigital

    volumesfrom319millioninW4.

    • FilmsandTVprogrammesaretheothercategorieswheredigital volumeshavenotably

    shiftedfromthepreviouswave.Thedigitalvolumesforfilmhasdecreasedfrom81million

    foronlinefilmsinwave4andTVprogrammes’volumeshaveincreasedfrom98million.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    30/60

    26 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    Table 2.2.2a: Paid vs. free content in Digital formats

    Digitalformat

    Volumes are in millions Paidcontent Freecontent

    Music

     Volume 76m 267m

    %oftotal 22% 78%

    Films

     Volume 25m 31m

    %oftotal 45% 55%

    Programmes

     Volume 29m 90m

    %oftotal 24% 76%

    Computer

    Software

     Volume 4m 9m

    %oftotal 31% 69%

    Books

     Volume 15m 11m

    %oftotal 57% 43%

     VideoGames

     Volume 9m 4m

    %oftotal 66% 34%

    • Unsurprisingly there are big differences in paid and free content for the music, TV

    programmesandcomputersoftware,withfreecontentvolumesbeingmuchhigherthan

    paidcontentvolumes,forallexceptvideogames.

    • HigherproportionsoffreecontentwithinthedigitalformatisseenforTVprogrammes,

    musicandcomputersoftwarecategories.Whereastheproportionofpaidcontentishigher

    invideogamescategoryfollowedbyebookscategory.

    • Intermsofvolume,freedigitalmusiccontentstandsoutwith267milliontracksconsumed

    onlineforfree.

    • Whencomparedtowave4thebiggestshiftsinfreecontentvolumesarealsoseeninthe

    music,filmandTVprogrammescategories.Inwave4thedigitalfreecontentvolumes

    were215million,27millionand64million,respectively.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    31/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    27

    Table 2.2.2b: Legal vs. Illegal content in Digital formats

    Digitalformat

    Volumes are in millions Legalcontent Illegalcontent

    Music

     Volume 247m 96m

    %oftotal 72% 28%

    Films

     Volume 44m 12m

    %oftotal 77% 23%

    Programmes

     Volume 102m 16m

    %oftotal 86% 14%

    Computer

    Software

     Volume 10m 2m

    %oftotal 78% 22%

    Books

     Volume 25m 1m

    %oftotal 94% 6%

     VideoGames

     Volume 17m 3m

    %oftotal 85% 15%

    • Weestimatethat96millionmusictrackswereaccessedillegallyonlineinthelast3months.

     Themusiccategoryhasthehighestvolumeandproportionofinfringementcomparedto

    theothercategories.

    • Weseethattheebookscategoryhasamuchlowerlevelofinfringementwithonly6%of

    thecategoryusersaccessingillegalcontent.

    • Thelevelofinfringementhasdeclinedinthemusicandfilmcategoriesfromthoseseenin

    2013.Inthepreviouswave(conductedinMarchtoMay2013),wefoundanestimateof

    157milliontracksbeingaccessedillegallyinthemusiccategorywhichhasnowreduced

    to96million.Inthefilmcategoryweestimate18millionsfilmswerebeingillegallyaccessed

    whichhasalsoreducedto12millioninthiswave.

    • However,intheTVprogrammescategoryinfringementlevelshaverisenfrom12millionin

    thepreviouswaveto16millioninthiswave.

    • Fortheothercategoriestheinfringementlevelsremainstablesince2013.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    32/60

    28 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    2.3 Consumer spend

     Thissectionoutlinesthemainfindingsforconsumerspendacrossthesixcontenttypes.

    2.3.1 Quarterly consumer spend among 12+ year olds

     Thetablebelowshows,atarespondentlevel,theaveragespendbycontenttypesinthepast

    threemonthsacrossanumberofdifferentmeansofexpenditure.Italsoshowstheproportion

    oftheentireUKpopulation(i.e.notjustinternetusers)aged12+whoclaimtohavespentany

    moneyontheseitems:

    Table 2.3.1a: Average consumer quarterly spend among 12+ year olds

    – all content types16

    Sig.increase

    (fromW4)

    Sig.decrease

    (fromW4)

    Mean % Mean % Mean % Mean % Mean % Mean %

    Purchases/rentals

    inphysicalformat

    £4.67 19% £4.51 21% £3.53 14% £3.98 9% £8.09 34% £6.91 14%

    Individualdigital

    purchases

    £1.34 10% £0.70 4% £0.92 4% £0.96 3% £1.06 7% £1.71 5%

    OnlineSubscriptions £1.90 5% £1.17 6%

    Other £12.39 16% £8.86 34% £2.23 6% £1.50 7% £1.63 6%

    TOTAL16 £20.28 30% £16.64 44% £6.68 17% £4.94 10% £10.65 38% £10.24 16%

    Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books VideoGames

    Meanistheaveragespendamongall12+yearoldsintheUK%istheproportionof12+yearoldsintheUKwho

    spentanythingonthecontenttype

    Base:All12+yearoldsintheUK(5192)

    • Acrossthesixcontenttypes,musichasthehighestaveragespendperpersonintheUK

    aged12+,at£20.28,aheadoffilmat£16.64.

    • Ahigherproportionofpeopleclaimedtohavespentmoneyinthepastthreemonths,on

    films(44%)andbooks(38%)thanonothercontenttypes.

    • Nineteenpercentofthoseaged12+intheUKclaimedtospendmoneyonphysicalmusic

    (onCD,vinylortape)duringtheperiod,comparedto10%fordigitalmusic(downloaded

    orstreamed).Averagespendonphysicalproductswassubstantiallyhigherthanondigital

    forallcontenttypes.

    • For both music and film, average spend on ‘other’ (including cinema/concerts and

    merchandise)wassubstantiallyhigherthanspendonphysicalanddigitalcontent.

    16 Notethatthetotalpercentagesaddtolessthantheindividualpercentagesaddedtogetherduetoduplicationi.e.

    ifsomeonepurchasedinphysicalformatandonlinetheyonlycountonce.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    33/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    29

    • TVprogrammes (£6.68)andcomputer software (£4.94)hadthelowest averagespend

    acrossthesixcontenttypes.Thelatteralsohadthelowestproportionofthepopulation

    spendinganythinginthethreemonthperiod.

    • Therehavebeensmallchangesintheaveragespendbutnonesignificant.Theaverage

    spendhasincreasedintheTVprogrammescategoryfrom£5.05inW4to£6.68forthe

    currentwave,forebooks,theaveragespendhasshiftedfrom£9.79inthepreviouswave

    to£10.65andinvideogamesweseeanincreasefrom£8.35inW4to£10.24forthe

    currentwave.TheincreaseinTVprogrammecategoryismainlydrivenbythespendon

    ‘other’ (merchandise) whilst ebooks and video games change in average spend is a

    functionofincreaseinthephysicalformatspend.

     The following table shows the averagespend for each content type (see previous charts for

    detailsofspendcoverage)amongthelegalitygroups:

    Table 2.3.1b: Average consumer quarterly spend among legality groups

    – all content types

    Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books VideoGames

    100% legal£45.90

    (1351)

    £21.14

    (388)

    £11.22

    (1356)

    £23.48

    (455)

    £27.34

    (541)

    £53.83

    (504)

    Mix of legal and £77.56 £54.35 £22.94 £90.91

    illegal (195) (75*) (108)£14.18 £20.59

    (52**)

    100% illegal£26.50

    (262)

    £21.20

    (182)

    £4.65

    (229)

    (123**) (72*)£9.68

    (62**)

    Basesforindividualgroupsareincludedinbrackets.

    *Caution:baseunder100**Basetoolowtoanalyseindividuallegalitygroups(figuresshownfor‘anyillegal’)

    • Forfiveofthesixcategories,wenoticedadeclineinspendamongstthosewhoconsumed

    thecontent100%illegallycomparedtopreviouswave.Themusiccategoryistheonly

    exceptionforthisobservation.Theaveragequarterlyspendhasremainedstableamongst

    infringers.

    • Infourofthesixcategories,thosewhoconsumedamixoflegalandillegalcontentclaimed

    tospendmoreonthatparticularcontenttypeoverthethreemonthperiodthanthosewho

    consumedeither100%legallyor100%illegally.(Forebooksandcomputersoftwarethe

    samplesizewastoolowtomakearobustassessment).

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    34/60

    30 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    Table 2.3.2: Total quarterly spend estimates – all content types17

    Sig.

    increase(from

    W4)

    Sig.

    decrease

    (fromW4)

    Music Films Programmes Computer

    Software

    Books VideoGames

    Spend % Spend % Spend % Spend % Spend % Spend %

    Purchases/ £250m 23% £241m 30% £189m 53% £213m 81% £433m 76% £370m 67%

    rentals

    inphysical

    format

    £71m 7% £37m 5% £49m 14% £51m 19% £56m 10% £91m 17%Individual

    digital

    purchases

    £101m 9%

    £663m 61%

    £61m

    £474m

    8%

    58% £119m 33%

    £80m

    14%

    £87m

    16%

    Online

    Subscriptions

    Other

    TOTAL8 £1,088m £816m £358m £265m £570m £549m

    Spendisthetotalamountspentacrossall12+yearoldsintheUK%istheproportionofthetotalspendattributedtothespecificcategory

    Base:All12+yearoldsintheUK(5192)

    • Musichadthehighestoverallquarterlyspendacrossthecontenttypes,atanestimated

    £1,088m,followedbyfilms(£816m).Spendonmusicinphysicalformatduringthisperiod

    (£250m) was more than that generated from digital music (approximately £172m for

    individualpurchasesandonlinesubscriptionscombined).

    • However,inabsolute terms, the£172mspent on digitalmusicwasbyfar thehighest

    digitalspendacrossthesixcategoriesevaluated,comparedtofilms(£98m),computer

    software(£51m),andvideogames(£91m).DigitalspendwaslowestonTVprogrammes,

    at£49m,followedby£51mforcomputersoftware.

    • Spendon physical content was highest forbooks (£433m), followed by video games

    (£370m).Inlinewithpreviousfindings,TVprogrammehadthelowestspendat£189m.

    17 *Other includes:Music=Concerts/gigs(£607m54%)Merchandise(£91m,8%)Films=Cinema(£382m,41%)

    Merchandise(£43m,5%),PayTVpurchases(£138m,15%)TVprogrammes=Merchandise(£60m,22%).

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    35/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 31

    • Theoverallspendinthefilmcategoryhasdroppedfromthepreviouswavemainlydriven

    bythedeclineinthe‘other’(merchandise/cinema)spend.Thisiseventhoughtherehas

    beenanincreaseinboththephysicalandonlinesubscriptionsspendsincetheprevious

    wave.

    • TheoppositeholdstruefortheTVprogrammescategory,thetotalspendinthiscategory

    hasincreasedsincethelastwavein2013.Thisriseinspendismainlydrivenbythe‘other’

    (merchandise)spendincreaseandtherehasbeenadeclineinthequarterlyspendinthe

    physicalformat.

    • Outofallthecategories,thevideogamescategoryspendshavegrownsignificantlyacross

    alltheformatsi.ephysical,onlineandothersincethepreviouswave.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    36/60

    32 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     3.Attitudestowardsdigital

    activitiesandcopyright

    infringement

    3.1 Motivations for general online activities

     The survey included severalquestionsaround consumerattitudes with aview touncovering

    primarymotivationsforparticipating(andalsonottakingpart,inthecaseofdownloading)inthe

    activitiescoveredinthesurveyi.e.downloading,streaming/accessing,andsharingcontent.

     The following tables show the ranked prompted responsesamongst those claiming to have

    participatedintheseactivitiesinthepastthreemonths.Wehaveincludedonlythoseanswers

    thatgainedaresponserateof4%ormore.

     Although not displayed in the following tables, it is worth noting that motivations forgeneral

    onlinebehaviourweresimilar,bothforthosewhohadconsumedanyillegalcontent,andforthe

    generalinternetpopulation,sincethesequestionsfocusedonthegeneralactsofdownloading,streamingandsharing(withoutanyreferencetolegality).Thesubsectionfollowingthisone

    focusesonmotivationsforlawfulandunlawfulactivity.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    37/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    33

    Table 3.1a. Motivations for downloading (or not) content online

    DOWNLOADINGCONTENTONLINE

     Youindicatedyouhavedownloaded[CONTENTTYPES] inthepastthreemonths.Generally,what

    wouldyousayareyourpersonalreasonsfordownloadingthesetypesoffilesratherthanbuyinga

    physicalversionsuchasaCD,DVD,Bluray,paper,etc.?

    Base:Allwhohaddownloadedanyofthesixcontenttypesofinterestinthepastthreemonths(2013)

    It’seasier/moreconvenient 63%

    It’squicker 55%

    It’scheaper 42%IcanaccessthemmoreeasilyonthedevicesIhave 34%

    Icangetthemforfree 31%

     Thequalityisn’tnoticeablydifferent 16%

    It’smoreuptodate 15%

    Nophysicalversionavailable 12%

    It’swhateveryonedoes 11%

    Whatarethereasonsthatyouhavenotdownloadedanyfilesinthepastthreemonths?

    Base:Allwithinternetaccesswho’dnotdownloadedanyofthesixcontenttypesofinterestinthe

    pastthreemonths(2972)

    I’mnotinterested 65%

    Iprefertohaveaphysicalcopy 15%

    I’mnotsurehowtodoit 13%

    Ifeartheymayhaveviruses/malware/spyware 7%

     Theyaretooexpensive 7%

    Ifearthattheycouldbeillegal 5%

    Iprefertostream/access(withoutdownloading)files 6%

    Itiseasiertobuyphysicalcopies 5%

    Sig.increase(fromW4)Sig.decrease(fromW4)

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    38/60

    34 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    Table 3.1b. Motivations for streaming or accessing content online

    STREAMING/ACCESSINGCONTENTONLINE

     Youindicatedyouhaveaccessedorstreamed[CONTENTTYPES]inthepastthreemonths.Whatare

    yourpersonalreasonsfordoingthis?

    Base:Allwhohadstreamedoraccessedanyofthesixcontenttypesofinterestinthepastthree

    months(2492)

    It’seasy/convenient 60%

    It’squick 48%

    It’sfree 44%

    It’seasytodo 40%

     TowatchprogrammesIhavemissed(onTV) 23%

    Forentertainment 30%

    ItmeansIdon’thavetodownloadthem 20%

    It’squickerthandownloading 21%

    ItmeansIcantrysomethingbeforeIbuyit 14%

    It’scheaperthandownloading 13%

    Sometypesoffilesaretooexpensivetobuy 6%

    It’swhatmyfriendsorfamilydo 6%

    Table 3.1c. Motivations for sharing content online

    SHARINGCONTENTONLINE

     Youindicatedyouhaveshared[CONTENTTYPES]inthepastthreemonths.Whatareyourpersonal

    reasonsfordoingthis?

    Base:Allwhohadsharedanyofthesixcontenttypesofinterestinthepastthreemonths(454)

    It’seasytodo 49%

    It’sonlyfair 29%

    It’swhateveryonedoes 26%

    IshouldbeabletosharemycontentwithwhomeverIchoose 16%

    Myfriends/familycan’taccessfilesthemselves 15%

    • Sincethelast wave in 2013,themotivations for usinggeneral online activitiesremain

    largelystable.Thereisaslightdeclineintheoverallresponsebutthisisnotasignificant

    change.

    • “Ease/convenience” remains the prime motivator both for downloading (63%) and for

    streaming/accessing(60%)content.Speed(i.e.“it’squick”)wasalsohighlycited–by55%

    amongdownloadersand48%amongstreamers.Theseresponseshavebeenatsimilar

    levelsacrossallfourwavesconductedsofar.

    • Theabilitytoaccesscontentforfreeappearedmoreimportanttostreamers(44%)thanto

    downloaders(31%).

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    39/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 35

    • Themajority(65%)ofthosewhosaidtheydidn’tdownloadweresimplynotinterested,but

    apartfromthis,thepreferenceforowningaphysicalcopywasalsoamajorreason(15%).

     ThepreferenceforowningaphysicalcopyhasdeclinedsignificantlyfromW4(23%).

    • Amongstthosewhohavesharedfiles,theeaseofsharing(“easytodo”)wasthemain

    reasongiven(49%).

    Findings from the Qualitative interviews:

     The qualitative interviews amongst infringers highlighted that consumers perceive different

    activities ashaving varying levels ofseriousness in infringement. The hierarchy notedis as

    follows.

    Sharingfileswaswidelythoughttobetheactivitywheretheseriousnessofconductingillegal

    activity is greatest. This is then followed by downloading activity with the lowest level of

    infringementregardedasstreaming.

    Infringers describedtheir perceptions about thedifferent typesof activitiesandstated that

    sharingfilesistheleastsecureactivityasitcanprovideaccesstousers’devices.Thiswasseen

    asaconcernandapotentialimpedimenttodoingit.Sharing(uploading)wasalsoseentoslow

    downthedownloadingprocess.

    Withregardstodownloading,infringersconsideredthisactivitytorequirethemostwork.It

    requiredinfringerstodothemostanditwasseenthatthereisaneedtoplanaheadandto

    ensure they have enough disk space to store files. Some mentioned that they carry out

    background research on the source before downloading files from a site. However with

    downloadingthemainbenefitcitedwasthattheycouldthenstoreahighvolumeofcontent.In

    addition,portabilitybetweendevicesandacrossformatsisanothermotivationfordownloading

    thatwascitedintheinterviews.

    Streamingofcontentisgenerallyperceivedtobe“lessillegal”.Thiswasseentobethemost

    secureasthereisnodownloadinginvolvedandhencelessexposuretotheirdevices.Streaming

    was also considered a much faster way of accessing content than downloading. There isgenerallysomereluctance (amongst infringers) to subscribe to illegal streamingservicesas

    thereisareticencetowardssharingpersonalinformation.Streamingisalsoseenasagoodfit

    foraccessingcontentwhilstoutofhome,howeverthereareconcernsoverdataallowanceand

    devicebatterylife.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    40/60

    36 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    3.2 Attitudes towards online content

    Respondentswereaskedthefollowing,inrelationtotheirconsumptionofdigitalmedia.

    To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?

    1:Stronglyagree

    2:Slightlyagree

    3:Neitheragreenordisagree

    4:Slightlydisagree

    5:Stronglydisagree

     Thetablebelowoutlinestheproportionswhoagree(stronglyorslightly)amongstal lthosewith

    internetaccess(aged12+),andthenamongstthethreelegalitygroups(aggregatedacrossall

    sixcontenttypes):

    Table 3.2: Proportion of legality groups who agree with statements

    Q.4Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree

    witheachofthefollowingstatements?

     Allaged12+

    withinternet

    access

    100%legal

    Mixof

    legaland

    illegal

    100%

    illegal

    Base 4552 1166 491 264

    Contentthatyoudownloadoraccessonline

    shouldbecheaperthantheequivalent

    purchasedinaphysicalformat

    58% 71% 72% 48%

    Itiswrongtoaccesscontentonlinewithoutthe

    creator’s/artist’spermission53% 64% 42% 33%

     Therulesgoverningwhatyoucanandcan’tdo

    withcontentyoupurchaseshouldbethesame

    forbothphysicalandonlineformats

    49% 61% 48% 36%

    Ifyouhadpaidforadigitalfileyoushouldthen

    beabletoshareitwithothers39% 44% 53% 36%

    Itiseasytofindcontentontheinternetforfree

    thatwouldusuallybepaidfor36% 39% 60% 37%

    Ithinkthatyoushouldbeabletodownloador

    accessthecontentyouwantforfreefromthe

    internet

    34% 34% 53% 41%

     Thepricethatyoupaytodownloadoraccess

    contentonlineisgenerallyaboutright 28% 31% 34% 25%

    Ifinditdifficulttofindlegalcontentonline 17% 15% 31% 23%

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    41/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5 37

    • Thereweresomesignificantchangesinthelevelsofagreementwiththeabovestatements

    betweenW4andW5.Ingeneral,thelevelofagreementhasdeclinedacrosseachofthe

    groupsinthiswave.

    • Themajorityofthoseaged12+withinternetaccess,agreedthatonlinecontentshouldbe

    cheaperthantheequivalentpurchasedinaphysicalformat(58%).However,thefigurewas

    muchloweramongthosewhoconsumedalltheircontentillegally(48%)thanamongthose

    whoconsumedlegalcontent(71%).

    • Intermsofthestatement:“thepriceyoupayfordownloadedoraccessedcontentonline

    isaboutright”thelevelofagreementwasalsoloweramongthosewhoconsumedonly

    illegalcontent(25%)thanamongtheothertwogroups(31%34%).

    • The‘mixoflegalandillegal’groupwasthemostlikelytoagreethat“youshouldbeableto

    sharedigitalfilesifyouhavepaidforthem”(53%).Sixtypercentofthisgroupalsoagreed

    that “it iseasyto find contentontheinternet(that you usuallypay for) for free”.Both

    infringinggroupswerelesslikelytothink“itiswrongtoaccesscontentonlinewithoutthe

    creator’s/artist’spermission”–42%and33%respectivelycomparedto64%amongthose

    whoconsumedalltheircontentlegallyfor‘mixoflegalandillegal’and‘100%illegal.

    3.3 Motivations for lawful and unlawfulbehaviour

    Furtherquestionsonattitudeswereaskedinordertoassesstheprimarymotivationsforlawful

    and unlawfulbehaviour, inan attempt touncover factors that mightencourage thosewho

    currentlyinfringetostop.

    Respondentswhopaidforanycontentwereasked:

    You indicated you have paid to download or stream/access [CONTENT TYPES] in the past three

     months. What were your personal reasons for doing this rather than using services where you

    could have got them for free?

    Itisimportanttotakeintoaccountthatwhenweaskabouttheuseofpaidservicesoverfree

    oneswearenotnecessarilyimplyingthatthelatterareillegal–aswehaveseenformanyofthe

    content types, free services such as YouTube, BBC iPlayer and Facebook are particularly

    popularwhenitcomestoconsumingandsharingcontent.

    However,aswellasassessingresponsesamongthosewhosimplypaidforanycontent,itis

    also possible tocompare the responses of thosewho consumedcontent both legally and

    illegallywiththosewhoconsumedcontentonlylegally.Table3.3adisplaysthemainreasons

    givenforpayingforonlinecontent:

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    42/60

    38 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    Table 3.3a. Motivations for using paid services

     Anypaid 100%legalMixoflegaland

    illegal

    Base 1481 487 308

    It’seasier/moreconvenient 48% 41% 43%

    It’squicker 44% 38% 45%

    Idon’twanttouseillegalsites 37% 37% 22%

    Iwanttosupportcreators/industry 24% 21% 20%

    Ithinkit’smorallywrongtouseillegal

    sites 24% 23% 11%

    Ifeartheymayhaveviruses/malware/

    spyware 22% 19% 17%

     Theyarebetterquality 24% 21% 28%

    Idon’tthinkitisrighttogetthemforfree 16% 13% 5%

    Iprefertopay 16% 12% 11%

    Icanaffordtopay 17% 10% 15%

    IfearImightbecaught 8% 6% 8%

    I’munawareofthefreeservicesavailable 9% 15% 6%

    Idon’tknowhowtousethefreeservices 6% 8% 2%

     Averagenumberofreasonscited 2.9 2.6 2.3

    • Thereare significant shifts in thereasons cited forusing paid services. This maybea

    function of the decrease in the average number of responses which were provided,

    particularlyamongthosewhoexclusivelyuselegalservices.

    • Conveniencewasthemostcommonlycitedreasonbothamongstthosewhoaccessedall

    oftheircontentlegallyandamongthosewhoseconsumptionwaspartlyillegal(48%v

    43%).

    • However,thereweremarkeddifferencesamongthetwolegalitygroupsacrosstheother

    motivations.Thosewhoconsumedcontententirelylegallyweremuchmorelikely(37%)

    thanthosewhoinfringed(22%)tosaythattheydidnotwanttouseillegalsites(possibly

    conflatingfreesitesandillegalsites).

    • Comparedtothosewhoaccessedbothlegalandillegalcontentweremorelikelytosay

    thattheyusedpaidservicesbecausetheyarequicker(45%v38%),andbecausetheyare

    betterquality(28%v21%).

    • Thosewhoaccessedbothlegalandillegalunsurprisingly,werelesslikelytobeaverseto

    freeandillegalservices;just11%saidthey“thinkit’smorallywrongtouseillegalsites”,

    and5%thatthey“don’tthinkitisrighttogetcontentforfree”.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    43/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    39

    Respondentswhoindicatedthattheyhadinfringedinthepast3monthswereasked:

    You indicated you have downloaded or streamed the following types of files in the past three

     months which you think may have been done so illegally [CONTENT TYPES]. What are your

     personal reasons for doing this?

     Themainreasonsgivenforunlawfulconsumptionofcontentwereasfollows:

    Table 3.3b. Motivations for unlawful consumption of content online

     Anyillegal 100%illegal Mixoflegal

    andillegal

    Base 761 268 493

    It’sfree 49% 43% 53%

    It’seasy/convenient 43% 39% 46%

    It’squick 37% 32% 40%

    ItmeansIcantrysomethingbeforeIbuyit 17% 8% 22%

    Ican’taffordtopay 14% 7% 18%

    Ithinklegalcontentistooexpensive 13% 9% 15%

    BecauseIcan 16% 11% 19%

    I’vealreadypaidtoseeit/thematthecinema/inconcert,etc 7% 3% 10%

    Ialreadyownedcontentinanotherformat 9% 4% 12%

    Idon’twanttowaitforcontenttobecomeavailableonlegal

    services 7% 3% 10%

     TheIndustrymakestoomuchmoney 9% 6% 10%

    It’swhatmyfriendsorfamilydo 9% 7% 9%

    Ialreadyspendenoughoncontent 5% 1% 8%

     ThefilesIwantarenotavailableonlegalservices 8% 3% 10%

    Idon’tthinkIshouldhavetopayforfilesonline? 5% 4% 6%

    Noonesuffers 4% 2% 6%

    Ithinklegalcontentistoopoorquality 2% 2% 2%Nooneevergetscaught 2% 3% 2%

     Averagenumberofaspectscited 2.5 1.8 2.7

    • Evenamongstinfringerstheaveragenumberofreasonscitedforusingunlawfulservices

    hasseenanotabledeclinefrom3.1inW4to2.5reasonsinW5.

    • Overall,thefreeaspect(49%)isthemainmotivationforillegalconsumption,andthishas

    beenthecaseinallfivewavesoftheresearch.Generally,responseswerehigherforthose

    inthe‘mixoflegalandillegal’groupthanforthe‘100%illegal’group,andthisisreflected

    intheaveragenumberofreasonscitedbyeachgroup(2.7v1.8respectively).

    • Twentytwopercentofallthe‘mixoflegalandillegal’groupsaidtheydoitbecausethey

    cantrybeforetheybuywhichishigherthantheexclusiveinfringersgroupaswellasthe

    anyillegalgroup(22%v8%v17%)

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    44/60

    40 Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    Findings from the qualitative interviews among infringers:

     The qualitative interviews complemented the quantitative results stated previously. Infringers

    said that they use unlawful services as the legal sites are perceived to be very expensive

    especiallywhenfreealternativesourcesareavailable.Infringerscouldbepersuadedtopotentially

    payforsome(single)tracksorshowsbutwhentheywanttoaccessalbumsorseriesofshows,

    theyprefertousethealternativefreesources.Therewasanindicationthatunlawfulservicesare

    oftenusedwhenpeoplewantedtotrialsomecontent.However,thisdoesnotnecessarilymean

    thatafterthetrialtheyarelikelytopurchasethecontentlegally.Whenaskedwhytheywon’tbuy

    thecontentafterthefreetrialonerespondentsaid“Ican’tafford100+tracks!”suggestingthat

    thereisanimplicitacknowledgmentofthevalueofthecontentthatinfringerswereconsuming.

     Another key motivation for using unlawful services was the accessibility and scale of illegal

    sources.Itwasgenerallyperceivedthatunofficialsourceshaveamuchwiderlibrary/rangeof

    contentavailablethanthelegalpaidservices.Illegalserviceswerealsoseentoprovideaccess

    toolderormorenichecontentwhichisnotnecessarilyavailablethroughpaidservices.

    Qualityofcontentbeingconsumedwasnotgenerallyseenasanimpedimenttousingunofficial

    servicesandthe tradeoffbetweenpaymentandhigherqualitywasnotdeemedworthwhile.

     Thereweresomesuggestionsthatinfr ingersfinditlesscomplicatedtouseunlawfulservicesas

    theyweregenerallyseentobereasonablyreliableandefficient.Inthiscontextoneofthemale

    respondentsaid“Itworksandit’sreallystraightforward,there’snonegativesidetoitbeingillegal.Youwouldthinkthepaidsitewouldbemoreefficientorreliablebutit’sthesame,there’s

    nodifferencereally.”

    Havingtheconvenienceofeasyaccesstocontentwasanothermotivationgivenforuseof

    unlawfulservices.Therewasaperceptionthattheywereopenandeasytousewheneverthey

    like and most give the option toeither downloador stream the content depending on the

    devicesandbroadband/WiFiconnectionthattheyhave.

    Finally,amotivationthatalsoemergedforillegalserviceusewastoaccesstocontentbeforeit

    becomesavailableintheUK.ThiswasmostcommonlynotedwhendiscussingTVshowsand

    filmsthatareoftenreleasedintheUSAbeforetheUKorwhichhaverestrictedaccessintheUK.

  • 8/20/2019 Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey, 5th Wave (Full Text Report)

    45/60

    Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Wave 5

     

    41

    Infringerswerealsoasked:

     And which, if any, of the following do you think would make you stop downloading or streaming

    files illegally?

    Table 3.3c. Aspects that would encourage stopping accessing content

    illegally online

     Anyillegal 100%

    illegal

    Mixoflegal

    andillegalBase 761 268 493

    Iflegalserviceswerecheaper 25% 14% 32%

    IfeverythingIwantedwasavailablelegally 21% 10% 26%

    Ifitisclearerwhatislegalandwhatisn’t 21% 18% 23%

    Ifeverythingwantedwasavailablelegallyonlineassoonas

    releasedelsewhere 16% 7% 20%

    Iflegalservicesweremoreconvenient/flexible 10% 4% 13%

    IfIthoughtImightbesued 15% 8% 19%

    Iflegalserviceswerebetter 12% 6% 16%

    IfasubscriptionserviceIwasinterestedinbecameavailable 13% 10% 16%

    IfIthoughtImightbecaught 15% 11% 17%

    IfmyISPsentmealettersayingtheywouldsuspendmy

    internetaccess 15% 10% 18%

    IfIknewwheretogotoseeifsomethingwasillegalornot 10% 6% 12%

    Ifeveryoneelsestoppeddoingit 11% 8% 13%

    Iffriendsorfamilywerecaught 11% 6% 14%

    IfmyISPsentmealetterinformingmemyaccounthadbeen

    usedtoinfringe 11% 7% 13%

    IfmyISPsentmealettersayingtheywouldrestrictmyinternet

    speed 10% 5% 13%

    Iftherewerearticlesinthemediaaboutpeoplebeingcaught 6% 4% 8%Nothingwouldmakemestop 10% 14% 8%

     Averagenumberofaspectscited 2.3 1.4 2.8

    • Thetopfourmostcommonlycitedfactorswereallthemedaroundmakinglegalservices

    more attractive,with the top response being “if legalserviceswere cheaper” (25% of

    infr