coq - assessing quality costs

Upload: razidah-sagap

Post on 07-Apr-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    1/44

    Assessing Quality Costs

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    2/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    3/44

    The Quality Cost Committee wasestablished by the then ASQC in 1961

    Philip Crosby, a former CEO,

    popularizedthe concept of COQ with his book Quality

    is Free in 1979

    The current revisions of ISO 9000, QS-9000 and AS9100 reference the use ofCOQ in quality improvement

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    4/44

    Crosbys categories

    Price of Conformance (POC/COC)

    Prevention costs

    Appraisal costs

    Price of Nonconformance(PONC/CONC)

    Internal defect costs

    External defect costs

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    5/44

    The cost of poor quality (COPQ = PONC): COPQ is the sum of all costs that would

    disappear if there were no quality problems.

    -Juran

    You can easily spend 15 - 30% of your sales

    dollars on PONC.- Crosby

    In most companies the costs of poor quality

    runs at 20 -30% of sales.- Juran

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    6/44

    Net profits for many companies is lessthan 5% of sales

    COPQ on the average is 17% of sales

    Total COQ on the average is 25% of sales COPQ is some companies is as high as40% of sales

    COPQ is typically 3 to 6 TIMES as largeas profits

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    7/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    8/44

    To consider the alternative models ofcosting (cost of quality approach)

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    9/44

    Quality Costing Approach

    Quality Loss Approach

    Process Cost Approach

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    10/44

    Conventional approach

    Categorize quality costs as:

    Prevention costs

    Appraisal costs

    Internal Failure costs

    External Failure costs

    Often known as PAF model

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    11/44

    The costs of all activities specificallydesigned to prevent poor quality inproducts or services. Examples include:

    Quality planning New product reviews

    Quality education

    Process capability evaluations Supplier capability surveys

    Quality improvement projects

    These are all planned, proactive activities

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    12/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    13/44

    In the ideal situation, prevention costs

    will bethe largest portion of the TotalCost of Quality.

    Typically, prevention is less than 10%

    of Total Cost Of Quality.

    It should be over 70%!

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    14/44

    The costs associated with evaluating orauditing products or services to assure

    conformance to quality standards and

    performance requirements. Examples:

    Incoming inspection/test

    Calibration of inspection/test equipment Final inspection/test

    These are all planned activities

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    15/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    16/44

    Appraisal costs should be the secondlargest category, but should not exceedprevention costs.

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    17/44

    All costs resulting from products or servicesnot conforming to requirements or

    customer/user needs which occurbefore

    delivery/shipment of product, or thefurnishing of a service. Examples include:

    Scrap/rework

    Reinspection/retesting Material Review Board

    These are non-value added and reactive

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    18/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    19/44

    The goal is to identify all

    internal failures andresultant costs, and thensystematically identifyand eliminate root causesuntil internal failure costsare eliminated.

    **Remember, allfirefighting is a the resultof a failure!

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    20/44

    All costs resulting from products or services

    not conforming to requirements or

    customer/user needs which occur after

    delivery/shipment of product, or the

    furnishing of a service.

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    21/44

    The costs incurred when the customer finds the failure Processing customer complaints

    Field repairs

    Recall costs

    Returned goods

    Processing returned materials

    Warranty costs

    Loss of reputation Penalties

    Customer incurred costs

    These are non-value added

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    22/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    23/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    24/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    25/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    26/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    27/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    28/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    29/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    30/44

    A survey by the Illinois ManufacturersAssociation revealed a 400% margin of error

    in cost of poor quality assessments.

    Companies initially reported an average of6% cost of poor quality (6% of sales).

    A later, in-depth assessment showed the

    average to be closer to 25% (25% of sales). The Survey Conclusion: 75% of the cost of

    poor quality is hidden, and not obvious!

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    31/44

    Results of an ASQ survey of CEOs:

    Over 70% thought their organizations COPQ was

    less than 10 percent of sales

    Twenty-seven percent admitted they had no idea

    what their companies COPQ was

    One of the conclusions of those conducting the

    survey: too many people still do not understandthe relationship between cost and quality

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    32/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    33/44

    Capture both tangible and intangiblecosts or losses due to poor quality

    Tangible losses

    E.g. scrap, rework and warranty costs Intangible losses

    E.g. lost sales due to customerdissatisfaction

    Use Taguchi Quality Loss Function toapproximate the intangible quality losses

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    34/44

    We cannot reduce cost without affectingquality

    We can improve quality without

    increasing cost We can reduce cost by improving quality

    We can reduce cost by reducing variation

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    35/44

    Allproductsare equally

    bad

    Allproductsare equally

    bad

    NominalLSL USL

    BadBad

    GoodGood

    All products areequally good

    All products within the specifications are equally good

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    36/44

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    37/44

    Taguchi focus on hidden costs or long termlosses related to engineering/managementtime, inventory, customer dissatisfaction,and lost market share in the long run.

    Loss occurs not only when products isoutside the specifications, but also when aproduct falls within the specification

    Taguchi has found that the simple quadraticfunction approximates the behaviour of lossin many instances.

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    38/44

    Look at costs for a process rather than for a productor a profit center Process cost model classify Cost of Quality as:

    Cost of conformance (COC) + Cost of nonconformance(CONC)

    Cost of conformance : cost incurred to fulfill all thestated and implied needs of customers in theabsence of failure

    Cost of Nonconformance: cost incurred due to failureof the existing process

    Most common methodology adopted for drivingprocess and productivity improvement

    Tend to be made up of three cost elements: Labor + Materials + Overheads

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    39/44

    Any activity that transforms inputs intooutputs utilizing resources and beingsubject to particular controls.

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    40/44

    Everyone in the company operates withina process

    Every process should have a process

    owner Process owner person who has the

    authority and responsibility for the

    effectiveness operation of that process

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    41/44

    1. Identify a key process to be measurede.g. order taking

    2. Define scope of process

    3. Identify process owner

    4. Determine the followings:

    Output and customers

    Inputs and suppliers

    Controls and resources

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    42/44

    5. Identify the costs of conformity (COC)and costs of nonconformity (CONC)associated with each key activity.

    6. List all the activities and their respectiveCOC and CONC elements

    7. COC or CONC elements can be actual or

    synthetic. A synthetic is built up ofestimated cost element

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    43/44

    8. Construct a regular process cost report.9. Circulate process cost report for

    comments

    10. Identify opportunities for improvement

    11. Establish improvement plans

    12. Conduct cost/benefit analysis to justify

    actions.

  • 8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs

    44/44

    Process CONC ItemsProduction Scrap, Rework, Repair & return

    Engineering Equipment damage/repair/downtime/modification, ECO

    Design Product redesign, Design change, CAD downtime

    Marketing Order cancellations, Customer complaints, Warranty,

    Product recall

    Human Resource Employee turnover, MC, Excessive/ Lack of labor, Losttime accident

    Finance Bad debts, Re-invoicing costs, payroll errors, Overdue A/R

    InformationTechnology

    Order entry error, Software error, computer breakdown

    Logistics Late delivery, Wrong delivery, Replacement, Handlingstorage

    Purchasing Late supplies, Obsolescence, Excessive Inventory, ChangePO