coq - assessing quality costs
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
1/44
Assessing Quality Costs
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
2/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
3/44
The Quality Cost Committee wasestablished by the then ASQC in 1961
Philip Crosby, a former CEO,
popularizedthe concept of COQ with his book Quality
is Free in 1979
The current revisions of ISO 9000, QS-9000 and AS9100 reference the use ofCOQ in quality improvement
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
4/44
Crosbys categories
Price of Conformance (POC/COC)
Prevention costs
Appraisal costs
Price of Nonconformance(PONC/CONC)
Internal defect costs
External defect costs
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
5/44
The cost of poor quality (COPQ = PONC): COPQ is the sum of all costs that would
disappear if there were no quality problems.
-Juran
You can easily spend 15 - 30% of your sales
dollars on PONC.- Crosby
In most companies the costs of poor quality
runs at 20 -30% of sales.- Juran
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
6/44
Net profits for many companies is lessthan 5% of sales
COPQ on the average is 17% of sales
Total COQ on the average is 25% of sales COPQ is some companies is as high as40% of sales
COPQ is typically 3 to 6 TIMES as largeas profits
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
7/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
8/44
To consider the alternative models ofcosting (cost of quality approach)
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
9/44
Quality Costing Approach
Quality Loss Approach
Process Cost Approach
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
10/44
Conventional approach
Categorize quality costs as:
Prevention costs
Appraisal costs
Internal Failure costs
External Failure costs
Often known as PAF model
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
11/44
The costs of all activities specificallydesigned to prevent poor quality inproducts or services. Examples include:
Quality planning New product reviews
Quality education
Process capability evaluations Supplier capability surveys
Quality improvement projects
These are all planned, proactive activities
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
12/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
13/44
In the ideal situation, prevention costs
will bethe largest portion of the TotalCost of Quality.
Typically, prevention is less than 10%
of Total Cost Of Quality.
It should be over 70%!
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
14/44
The costs associated with evaluating orauditing products or services to assure
conformance to quality standards and
performance requirements. Examples:
Incoming inspection/test
Calibration of inspection/test equipment Final inspection/test
These are all planned activities
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
15/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
16/44
Appraisal costs should be the secondlargest category, but should not exceedprevention costs.
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
17/44
All costs resulting from products or servicesnot conforming to requirements or
customer/user needs which occurbefore
delivery/shipment of product, or thefurnishing of a service. Examples include:
Scrap/rework
Reinspection/retesting Material Review Board
These are non-value added and reactive
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
18/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
19/44
The goal is to identify all
internal failures andresultant costs, and thensystematically identifyand eliminate root causesuntil internal failure costsare eliminated.
**Remember, allfirefighting is a the resultof a failure!
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
20/44
All costs resulting from products or services
not conforming to requirements or
customer/user needs which occur after
delivery/shipment of product, or the
furnishing of a service.
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
21/44
The costs incurred when the customer finds the failure Processing customer complaints
Field repairs
Recall costs
Returned goods
Processing returned materials
Warranty costs
Loss of reputation Penalties
Customer incurred costs
These are non-value added
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
22/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
23/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
24/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
25/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
26/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
27/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
28/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
29/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
30/44
A survey by the Illinois ManufacturersAssociation revealed a 400% margin of error
in cost of poor quality assessments.
Companies initially reported an average of6% cost of poor quality (6% of sales).
A later, in-depth assessment showed the
average to be closer to 25% (25% of sales). The Survey Conclusion: 75% of the cost of
poor quality is hidden, and not obvious!
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
31/44
Results of an ASQ survey of CEOs:
Over 70% thought their organizations COPQ was
less than 10 percent of sales
Twenty-seven percent admitted they had no idea
what their companies COPQ was
One of the conclusions of those conducting the
survey: too many people still do not understandthe relationship between cost and quality
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
32/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
33/44
Capture both tangible and intangiblecosts or losses due to poor quality
Tangible losses
E.g. scrap, rework and warranty costs Intangible losses
E.g. lost sales due to customerdissatisfaction
Use Taguchi Quality Loss Function toapproximate the intangible quality losses
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
34/44
We cannot reduce cost without affectingquality
We can improve quality without
increasing cost We can reduce cost by improving quality
We can reduce cost by reducing variation
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
35/44
Allproductsare equally
bad
Allproductsare equally
bad
NominalLSL USL
BadBad
GoodGood
All products areequally good
All products within the specifications are equally good
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
36/44
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
37/44
Taguchi focus on hidden costs or long termlosses related to engineering/managementtime, inventory, customer dissatisfaction,and lost market share in the long run.
Loss occurs not only when products isoutside the specifications, but also when aproduct falls within the specification
Taguchi has found that the simple quadraticfunction approximates the behaviour of lossin many instances.
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
38/44
Look at costs for a process rather than for a productor a profit center Process cost model classify Cost of Quality as:
Cost of conformance (COC) + Cost of nonconformance(CONC)
Cost of conformance : cost incurred to fulfill all thestated and implied needs of customers in theabsence of failure
Cost of Nonconformance: cost incurred due to failureof the existing process
Most common methodology adopted for drivingprocess and productivity improvement
Tend to be made up of three cost elements: Labor + Materials + Overheads
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
39/44
Any activity that transforms inputs intooutputs utilizing resources and beingsubject to particular controls.
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
40/44
Everyone in the company operates withina process
Every process should have a process
owner Process owner person who has the
authority and responsibility for the
effectiveness operation of that process
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
41/44
1. Identify a key process to be measurede.g. order taking
2. Define scope of process
3. Identify process owner
4. Determine the followings:
Output and customers
Inputs and suppliers
Controls and resources
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
42/44
5. Identify the costs of conformity (COC)and costs of nonconformity (CONC)associated with each key activity.
6. List all the activities and their respectiveCOC and CONC elements
7. COC or CONC elements can be actual or
synthetic. A synthetic is built up ofestimated cost element
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
43/44
8. Construct a regular process cost report.9. Circulate process cost report for
comments
10. Identify opportunities for improvement
11. Establish improvement plans
12. Conduct cost/benefit analysis to justify
actions.
-
8/4/2019 Coq - Assessing Quality Costs
44/44
Process CONC ItemsProduction Scrap, Rework, Repair & return
Engineering Equipment damage/repair/downtime/modification, ECO
Design Product redesign, Design change, CAD downtime
Marketing Order cancellations, Customer complaints, Warranty,
Product recall
Human Resource Employee turnover, MC, Excessive/ Lack of labor, Losttime accident
Finance Bad debts, Re-invoicing costs, payroll errors, Overdue A/R
InformationTechnology
Order entry error, Software error, computer breakdown
Logistics Late delivery, Wrong delivery, Replacement, Handlingstorage
Purchasing Late supplies, Obsolescence, Excessive Inventory, ChangePO