core and petrophysical analysis to design a proper

29
1 MENAPS-11-16 CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER PERFORATION TECHNIQUE FOR PRODUCTION ENHANCEMENT A CASE STUDY, HASSI MESSAOUD FIELD by: Said AbuBakr & Alban Collaku Schlumberger Baidji Mohamed, Sonatrach MENAPS-11-16

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

1 MENAPS-11-16

CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER PERFORATION

TECHNIQUE FOR PRODUCTION ENHANCEMENT

A CASE STUDY, HASSI MESSAOUD FIELD

by:Said AbuBakr & Alban Collaku Schlumberger

Baidji Mohamed, Sonatrach

MENAPS-11-16

Page 2: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

2 MENAPS-11-16

• Overview of Hassi-Messaoud field

• Core analysis

• Perforation strategy & Case Study

• Conclusions

Outline

Page 3: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

3 MENAPS-11-16

Overview of Hassi-Messaoud Field

Page 4: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

4 MENAPS-11-16

Hassi Messaoud field

Page 5: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

5 MENAPS-11-16

Hassi Messaoud field

Page 6: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

6 MENAPS-11-16

X

Page 7: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

7 MENAPS-11-16

• Coarse Grain Thin Beds (CGTB)• Fractures

Core analysis

Page 8: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

8 MENAPS-11-16

• Over all studied area where stacked fluvial or tidal channels the Coarse Grain Thin Beds are present (D4, D2, ID, D1)

• The Coarse Grain Thin Beds exhibits good porosity and permeability values and greatly contribute to the well potential

• CGTB in terms of flow might have the same behavior as fractures

Coarse Grain Thin Beds (CGTB)

Page 9: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

9 MENAPS-11-16

Example of Coarse Grain Thin Beds (CGTB) with tight matrix from above and below

Page 10: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

10 MENAPS-11-16

Photographs showing good examples of Coarse Grain Thin Beds separated by tight horizontal barrier.

Page 11: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

11 MENAPS-11-16

• In the analyzed wells, most of thevertical and sub-vertical fractures arevery thin with aperture much less than1 mm and very often cemented

• The wells where the thin layers andvertical fractures meet together theycould provide good rates of production

Fractures

Page 12: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

12 MENAPS-11-16

Fractures partly cemented by quartz and asphalt cutting across cross-beds

Core samples of D2 drain of Hassi-Messaoud field

Page 13: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

13 MENAPS-11-16

Example of CGTB’s connected with vertical fracture.

Page 14: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

14 MENAPS-11-16

K-Phi Plot

Perm from fractures

Most of the perm from matrix (CGTB) with two trends

Page 15: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

15 MENAPS-11-16

• Perforations Conventions• Dynamic underbalance (PURE)• Multiple Shooting• Coarse Grain Thin Beds & Multiple PURE

Shooting• Case Study – MD4XX

Perforation strategy & Case Study

Page 16: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

16 MENAPS-11-16

Perforation Conventions

• Static Conditions• Overbalance, Ph>Pr• Balance, Ph=Pr• Underbalance, Ph<Pr

• Dynamic Conditions • A combination of reservoir and well information and

knowledge put together to calculate for a dynamic underbalance for optimal perforation tunnels cleaning under all the above static conditions

Page 17: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

17 MENAPS-11-16

Dynamic Underbalance PURE* • A technique to obtain a dynamic underbalance

during the perforation process

• Can be performed in one or several runs

• Applies for oil, gas, water, in vertical, slanted, and horizontal wells.

• PURE perforation can also be oriented.

• Increases productivity or injectivity by maximizing perforation cleanup

• Is not an alternative for other means of formation stimulation

Page 18: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

18 MENAPS-11-16

Dynamic Versus Classical

Classical Underbalance

Dynamic Underbalance PURE

Page 19: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

19 MENAPS-11-16

Multiple Shooting

The objective of multiple shooting Is to obtain more SPF in a small Size casing (as of case 4 ½”) In order to expose more of CGTB toThe wellbore for enhancing well Productivity.

Page 20: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

20 MENAPS-11-16

Single and multiple Shooting with thin layers

Black Lines are Perforation Tunnels

Page 21: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

21 MENAPS-11-16

6 SPF

12 SPF

Single and multiple Shooting with CGTB’s

Black Lines are Perforation Tunnels

6 SPF

Page 22: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

22 MENAPS-11-16

MD4XX PetrelComposite Log

Completion4 ½” LCP

OLD PLTGR NPHI K ILD

Phie, Phi core

Sw

Page 23: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

23 MENAPS-11-16

SPAN MD-4XX

PURE and FOUR Times shooting (10 spf)

PURE but NO DOUBLE shooting @ 5.5 spf

No PURE (only HSD) and shooting @ 6 spf

FlowHoleOpen Undamaged

Flow WellPerforated=PR

o

p

q

q

Page 24: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

24 MENAPS-11-16

MD-4XX

MD-4XX– Drilled by Sonatrach

in Hassi Messaoud field in 1994

– Formation pressure @ 2008 = 2800 psi

Proposed intervals for perforating – Jun-2008

PURE Punchers

Top Loaded

(m)

Bottom Loaded

(m)

Shot Density (spf)

Shot Density

(spf)1 X421 X429 2.50 0.502 X421 X429 2.50 0.503 X421 X429 2.50 0.504 X421 X429 2.50 0.505 X429 X437 2.50 0.506 X429 X437 2.50 0.507 X429 X437 2.50 0.508 X429 X437 2.50 0.509 X437 X445 2.50 0.50

10 X437 X445 2.50 0.5011 X437 X445 2.50 0.5012 X437 X445 2.50 0.50

GUN SUMMARY

PowerJet Omega, 2906 HMX

Run

Intervals in ligth blue used Fast Gauges

Page 25: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

25 MENAPS-11-16

Run 1 to 12: X421-X445 m (4 Times Shooting) Run #5

Run #12

Expected Dynamic Underbalance = 1200 psi

Real Dynamic Underbalance = 120 psi

Real Dynamic Underbalance = 180 psi

Page 26: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

26 MENAPS-11-16

Pulse Responses

26

Run #8

Run #9

Run #10Run #11

Run #6

160 psi

100 psi

80 psi

200 psi

160 psi

Page 27: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

27 MENAPS-11-16

Results MD-4XX – Before and After PURE

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

0.0

2.5

5.0

7.5

6-Nov-07 1-Mar-08 11-Jun-08 14-Jun-08

Oil (m3/hr) Gas (m3/hr)

MD-4xx (Production Results before and after PURE perforating)

PURE and PowerJet Omega

job

Choke reduced from 15 mm to 12 mm

Testing Data

Choke Size

GOR

mm Oil Gas WHP FlowlineSeparator ProducedInjected

6-Nov-07 15 0.80 1170.5 1,469 19.2 12.5 3.98 19 620 7201-Mar-08 15 0.60 986.91 1,637 19 15 2.16 10 0

11-Jun-08 15 5.99 3807.2 636 34 15.5 5.4 34 20014-Jun-08 12 4.52 2856.4 632 47.8 16.8 6.42 33 240

Testing Data Before Re-Perforation

Testing Data After Re-Perforation

Pressure (kg/cm2)Flow Rates

(m3/h)Water flowrates

(l/h)Oil

Temperature (degC)

Page 28: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

28 MENAPS-11-16

Conclusions• The well completion design to allow of all or majority

of the Coarse Grain Thin Beds and the fractures to contribute in well production is a key of success of production enhancement.

• In the case of tight reservoir with CGTB’s and fractures, the best way is to complete open hole (bare foot completion) or to perforate with the highest shot density and deep penetration of a feasible gun technology.

• In the MD 4XX case, Multiple Dynamic underbalance perforation technology is used with very good results.

Page 29: CORE AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS TO DESIGN A PROPER

29 MENAPS-11-16

THANK YOU