corexit

Upload: maureen-dauphinee

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    1/11

    *

    * Investors

    * Contact

    * Extranet

    * Worldwide Locations

    * Region/Language

    * Search

    *

    Nalco North America Home

    * Expertise

    o Industries

    o Applications

    o Services

    o Document Library

    * Sustainability

    o Commitments

    o Solutions

    o Results

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    2/11

    o Awards

    o Responsible Care

    o REACH

    o Product Stewardship

    * Innovation

    o 3D TRASAR Technology

    o Clean Air Programs

    o Enhanced Oil Recovery

    o Flow Assurance Programs

    o Marketing

    o Research

    * About Nalco

    o Mission, Vision, Values

    o Businesses

    o Locations

    o History

    o Governance

    * News & Events

    o News Archive

    o Events

    o Media Library

    o Nalco Oil Dispersant Information

    * Careers

    o Joining Nalco

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    3/11

    o Search Career Opportunities

    o Internal Employee Application

    o What's New

    o Working at Nalco

    o Career Paths

    o E-Verify Employer

    Nalco Oil Dispersant Information

    * Dispersant Use Expert Testimony

    * Inaccuracy vs Fact About COREXIT Products

    * Nalco Statements

    * Oil Dispersant FAQ

    * Seven Facts About COREXIT 9500 Oil Dispersant

    * COREXIT Ingredients

    * Resource Links

    Contact Information

    Global Nalco Locations

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    4/11

    Local Sales Offices

    Energy Services Contacts

    *Nalco Company

    * *Corporate Headquarters*

    1601 W. Diehl Road

    Naperville, Il 60563-1198

    630-305-1000 Phone

    630-305-2900 Fax

    *Nalco Energy Services Headquarters

    *7705 Highway 90-A

    Sugar Land, TX 77478

    281-263-7000 Phone

    Twitter Feeds YouTube Channel

    Follow NalcoCareers on

    FaceBook

    Nalco North America Home News & Events

    Nalco Oil Dispersant Information

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    5/11

    Inaccuracy vs

    Fact About COREXIT Products

    Inaccuracy vs Fact About COREXIT Products

    /*(NEW) INACCURACY: Tests on Gulf workers show significant exposure to

    2-butoxyethanol.*/

    FACT: OSHA conducted testing for exposure to 2-butoxyethanol on relief

    workers in the Gulf of Mexico. According to Greenwire.com "OSHA's

    analysis of raw BP testing data concluded that among the 20 percent of

    sampled workers exposed to 2-butoxyethanol, 'the highest level measured

    was 0.8 ppm, and 90% of those were 0.2 ppm or less,' according to a

    statement from the agency. 'Every measurement was well below the NIOSH

    recommended limit of 5.0 ppm.'" The full Greenwire story can be read

    here.

    2-butoxyethanol is a componenet of COREXIT 9527, which was used

    sparingly in the early days of the Gulf oil spill. COREXIT 9500, which

    does not contain 2-butoxyethanol, has been exclusively used for the

    majority of the remediation effort.

    /*INACCURACY: The chemical formula of COREXIT has not been disclosed.*/

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    6/11

    FACT: Nalco has provided the Federal Government with all information

    relating to the chemicals and compounds in our product and is willing to

    provide this data to any state government that wants the information to

    analyze the effects of dispersants and protects the confidentiality of

    the proprietary information. We have complied with every request for

    information and assistance we have received from the Federal Government

    that is needed to protect human health and the environment and will

    continue to do so as we help mitigate the damaging consequences of the

    oil spilling into the Gulf. The ingredients to COREXIT products are

    available here .

    /*INACCURACY: COREXIT is banned in the United Kingdom.*/

    FACT: Corexit is approved in over 30 countries and we are unaware of a

    single country that has banned Corexit. The UK does not allow the use

    of Corexit for rocky shoreline application because it results in snails

    and other crustaceans not sticking to rocks. Corexit was not designed

    for rocky coast application and is only applied in the United States at

    least 3 miles off shore. However, Corexit 9500 did pass the UK test for

    off-shore use (what it was designed for) and existing stock use is

    allowed for that intended application with notification to appropriate

    authorities.

    /*INACCURACY: The EPAs May 20 dispersant directive ordered BP to stop

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    7/11

    using COREXIT.*/

    FACT: The EPAs dispersant directive

    gave BP

    24 hours to identify a less toxic and equally effective alternative if

    one existed, but as EPA Administrator Jackson said in a May 24 press

    conference

    , there

    was no order they had to switch. The directive indicated that If BP was

    unable to identify a less toxic and equally effective dispersant from

    the EPAs approved list within 24 hours, BP would provide an explanation

    to the EPA as to why the current dispersant (COREXIT) was the least

    toxic and most effective option available. BPs response to the EPAs

    directive is available here

    .

    In addition, during a press call hosted by Paul Anastas, assistant

    administrator for the Office of Research and Development at EPA, on June

    30 regarding the EPA's first round of independent dispersant testing,

    Anastas further clarified EPAs directive, stating, let me be clear

    about what we expected of BP. We expected them to, one, seek out the

    least toxic dispersant and to always be asking that question and always

    looking to identify that. And two, minimize the use of dispersant

    wherever possible to effectively deal with this crisis. And one of the

    things and I'll refer back to my statement that we've seen that after

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    8/11

    the Administrator made that communication to BP, we have seen the use of

    dispersants decrease by almost 70 percent from its peak usage.

    He went on to say, I think the important thing to clarify is what the

    administrator directed BP to do is to look at other dispersants in order

    to always ask the question about, "Are we using the safest, most

    effective dispersant that we can?" Its important that BP do that. Its

    important that we always bring to bear the most effective and safe

    dispersants for human health and the environment. And I think that

    that's the request that the Administrator made and that's what we will

    continue to insist upon. The full transcript of the June 30 press call

    can be found here

    .

    /*INACCURACY: COREXIT dispersant is the primary hazard to marine life in

    the Gulf.*/

    FACT: The EPA has indicated that COREXIT has been safe and effective in

    mitigating the impact of the oil on the environment. According to the

    EPA , toxicity data

    does not indicate any significant effects on aquatic life. Moreover,

    decreased size of the oil droplets is a good indication that, so far,

    the dispersant is effective. EPA Administrator Jackson also said that

    COREXIT has been effective in speeding biodegradation, and USCG Rear

    Admiral Landry indicated that COREXIT has prevented much more highly

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    9/11

    toxic oil from reaching US shorelines. (source: May 24 EPA Press

    Conference on Dispersant Use in the Gulf of Mexico

    ).

    According to Luann White, Director, Tulane Center for Applied

    Environmental Public Health Its not the dispersants that cause the

    ecological effects its the oil thats toxic. None of these

    dispersants is so innately toxic -- once you use them out in the Gulf,

    theyre not going to cause toxic effects in and of themselves. Tulane

    University, June 2, 2010 .

    /*INACCURACY: COREXIT dispersant is highly toxic.*/

    FACT: All of the ingredients contained in Nalcos dispersants are safe

    and found in common household products, such as food, hand and body

    lotion, packaging, cosmetics, and household cleaners. Corexit is

    approved for use by the EPA because it falls well within the agencys

    range of allowable toxicity levels. Corexit products biodegrade rapidly,

    do not bioaccumulate, are not human carcinogens, do not degrade into

    endocrine disruptors, and are not reproductive toxins. Common household

    soaps are more toxic to marine life than Corexit.

    In fact, Paul Anastas, the EPAs assistant administrator for research

    and development, told reporters Wednesday (June 30) that the Corexit

    9500 being used by oil company BP is among the least toxic to small

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    10/11

    fish of the eight products tested (Dispersants appear to break up in

    Gulf, EPA says, CNN Wire Staff, June 30, 2010).

    /*INACCURACY: COREXIT dispersant is hazardous to human health when used

    as directed.*/

    FACT: All of the ingredients contained in Nalcos dispersants are found

    in common household products, such as food, packaging, cosmetics, and

    household cleaners. Individually and collectively the ingredients are

    safe when used as directed. A May 13 Centers for Disease Control Oil

    Spill Dispersant Information for Health Professionals

    document notes that, Because of the strict guidelines that must be

    followed to utilize dispersants it is unlikely that the general public

    will be exposed to straight product. The report further states that

    ingredients are not considered to cause chemical sensitization; the

    dispersants contain proven, biodegradable and low toxicity surfactants.

    /*INACCURACY: COREXIT dispersant will evaporate into clouds and come

    back down in the rain*/

    FACT: COREXIT dispersants are made to disperse oil into the water column

    and not to evaporate. They biodegrade into the water and are not

    released back into the atmosphere. In fact, Admiral Thad Allen noted at

  • 7/29/2019 Corexit

    11/11

    a June 11 press conference that the primary surface use of Corexit is to

    protect worker safety.

    http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doctype/2931/54095/.

    /*INACCURACY: COREXIT dispersants will drift to populated areas when

    sprayed from airplanes.*/

    FACT: COREXIT is meant to be used at sea away from the shoreline and

    has been used in more than 30 countries, including Sweden, France,

    Australia, Norway and Canada. Aerial spraying of dispersant is not to

    take place within 2 miles of a boat or 3 miles of a shoreline. With

    30-mile per hour winds, the maximum expected drift for the dispersant is

    2,000 feet. Spraying of dispersant from boats should only be done with

    personal protective equipment. Again, the Centers for Disease Control

    says it is highly unlikely that the general public will be exposed to

    Corexit dispersants. Mists of the dispersant will not stray far from the

    boat given the proximity of the spray to the surface of the water.

    Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes Member 2009-10

    Copyright 2010 Nalco Company.

    All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Legal

    | Sitemap | Feedback