corporate social responsibility and ethics

35
PowerPoint slides by Susan A. Peterson, Scottsdale Community College Chapter 2: Ethics and Social Responsibility m a n a g e m e n t 2e H i t t / B l a c k / P o r t e r

Upload: abdinasir-hussein-mohamed

Post on 08-Dec-2014

58 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: corporate social responsibility and ethics

PowerPoint slides by

Susan A. Peterson, Scottsdale Community College

PowerPoint slides by

Susan A. Peterson, Scottsdale Community College

Chapter 2:Ethics and Social Responsibility

Chapter 2:Ethics and Social Responsibility

m a n a g e m e n t 2eH i t t / B l a c k / P o r t e r

m a n a g e m e n t 2eH i t t / B l a c k / P o r t e r

Page 2: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing2

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

Describe why an understanding of basic approaches to ethical decision making and corporate social responsibility is important

Compare and contrast the efficiency and social responsibility perspectives

Explain the strategic corporate social responsibility approach

Explain the basic approaches to ethical decision making

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

Describe why an understanding of basic approaches to ethical decision making and corporate social responsibility is important

Compare and contrast the efficiency and social responsibility perspectives

Explain the strategic corporate social responsibility approach

Explain the basic approaches to ethical decision making

Page 3: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing3

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

Explain the aspects of moral intensity

Describe the actions that can foster a high degree of ethical behavior in an organization

Explain the aspects of moral intensity

Describe the actions that can foster a high degree of ethical behavior in an organization

Page 4: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing4

Corporate Social ResponsibilityCorporate Social Responsibility

Obligation corporations have to constituencies and the nature and extent of those obligations

Constituencies include shareholders, customers, employees, specific communities, society at large, governments

Issue: constituencies may not share same expectations

Obligation corporations have to constituencies and the nature and extent of those obligations

Constituencies include shareholders, customers, employees, specific communities, society at large, governments

Issue: constituencies may not share same expectations

Page 5: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing5

Efficiency PerspectiveEfficiency Perspective

Efficiency perspective:

maximize profits for the owners of the business

Efficiency perspective:

maximize profits for the owners of the business

MANAGERS AS OWNERS

Self-interests of the manager-owner are best achieved by serving the

needs of society

MANAGERS AS AGENTS

Managers have no obligation to act

on behalf of society if it does not

maximize value for the shareholders

Page 6: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing6

Social Responsibility PerspectiveSocial Responsibility Perspective

Social responsibility perspective: firms have responsibilities and obligations to society as

a whole, not just shareholders

Social responsibility perspective: firms have responsibilities and obligations to society as

a whole, not just shareholders

Shareholders

Society

Financiers

Communities

Suppliers

Employees

FIRM

Key Stakeholders

Page 7: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing7

Efficiency Versus Social Responsibility PerspectiveEfficiency Versus Social Responsibility Perspective

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Irresponsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Responsible

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Irresponsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Responsible

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Irresponsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Irresponsible

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Irresponsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Irresponsible

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Responsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Responsible

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Responsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Responsible

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Responsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Irresponsible

Efficiency PerspectiveManagerially Responsible

Social ResponsibilityPerspective

Managerially Irresponsible

Action harms other stakeholdersAction harms other stakeholders

NoNo YesYes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Action harms other share-

holders

Action harms other share-

holders

Adapted from Exhibit 2.1

Page 8: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing8

Corporate ResponsesCorporate Responses

We will change when legally compelled to

do so.

We will change when legally compelled to

do so.

Maximize profits. Abide by

the letter of the law. Change when

legally compelled to do so.

Maximize profits. Abide by

the letter of the law. Change when

legally compelled to do so.

We must fight against efforts to restrict or

regulate our activities and profit-

making potential.

We must fight against efforts to restrict or

regulate our activities and profit-

making potential.

Maximize profits. Find legal loopholes. Fight new restrictions

and regulations.

Maximize profits. Find legal loopholes. Fight new restrictions

and regulations.

BeliefBelief

FocusFocus

DefendersDefenders AccommodatorsAccommodators

Adapted from Exhibit 2.2

Page 9: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing9

Corporate Responses (cont.)Corporate Responses (cont.)

We owe it to society to anticipate and avoid actions with harmful

consequences, even if we are not pressured or legally required to do so.

We owe it to society to anticipate and avoid actions with harmful

consequences, even if we are not pressured or legally required to do so.

Obtain profits, Abide by the law. Anticipate

harmful consequences independent of

pressures and laws.

Obtain profits, Abide by the law. Anticipate

harmful consequences independent of

pressures and laws.

We should respond to significant pressure even

if we are not legally required to.

We should respond to significant pressure even

if we are not legally required to.

Protect profits. Abide by the law. React to pressure that could

affect business results.

Protect profits. Abide by the law. React to pressure that could

affect business results.

BeliefBelief

FocusFocus

ReactorsReactors AnticipatorsAnticipators

Adapted from Exhibit 2.2

Page 10: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing10

Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective

Three fundamental criteria guide managers:Three fundamental criteria guide managers:

Inside-OutInside-OutApproachApproach

Outside-InOutside-InApproachApproach

Outside-OutOutside-OutApproachApproach

Look insidecompany at

issuesthat are

importantto the

company

Look outsidecompany at

issues that

company has an impact

upon

Look at social issues in general in

terms of the extent to

which they are

problematic

Page 11: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing11

Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility

Adapted from Exhibit 2.3

WorthyCause

(for someoneelse)

PrimeFocus

Low High

Critical to the Company

Low

Low

High

High

Affectedby theCompany

Problemin Society

Page 12: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing12

The Development of Individual EthicsThe Development of Individual Ethics

LifeExperiences

LifeExperiences

JobExperiences

JobExperiences

ReligionReligion TeachersTeachers

PeersPeers

FriendsFriends

FamilyFamily

IndividualEthics

IndividualEthics

Page 13: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing13

Basic Approaches to EthicsBasic Approaches to Ethics

Ethical dilemmas

The choice between two competing but arguably valid options

Frameworks for ethical decision making:

Utilitarian approach

Moral rights approach

Universalism approach

Justice approach

Ethical dilemmas

The choice between two competing but arguably valid options

Frameworks for ethical decision making:

Utilitarian approach

Moral rights approach

Universalism approach

Justice approach

Page 14: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing14

Basic Approaches to Ethics:Utilitarian ApproachBasic Approaches to Ethics:Utilitarian Approach

Focused on the consequences of an action

What is the “greatest good?”

Different people may see the outcome differently in terms of good or bad

Focused on the consequences of an action

What is the “greatest good?”

Different people may see the outcome differently in terms of good or bad

Page 15: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing15

Basic Approaches to Ethics:Moral Rights ApproachBasic Approaches to Ethics:Moral Rights Approach

Focused on moral standing of actions, independent of their consequences

Some things are simply “right” or “wrong”

When two actions have moral standing, then the positive or negative consequences of each will determine the more ethical

Focused on moral standing of actions, independent of their consequences

Some things are simply “right” or “wrong”

When two actions have moral standing, then the positive or negative consequences of each will determine the more ethical

Page 16: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing16

Basic Approaches to Ethics:Universal ApproachBasic Approaches to Ethics:Universal Approach

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto everyone, including yourself.”

Choose a course of action you believe can apply to all people under all situations

The issue of rights

Rights stem from freedom and autonomy

Actions that limit freedom and autonomy generally lack moral justification

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto everyone, including yourself.”

Choose a course of action you believe can apply to all people under all situations

The issue of rights

Rights stem from freedom and autonomy

Actions that limit freedom and autonomy generally lack moral justification

Page 17: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing17

Basic Approaches to Ethics:Justice ApproachBasic Approaches to Ethics:Justice Approach

Costs and benefits of actions:

Costs and benefits should be equitably distributed

Rules should be impartially applied

Those damaged should be compensated

Distributive justice

Equitable distribution is based on performance

Costs and benefits of actions:

Costs and benefits should be equitably distributed

Rules should be impartially applied

Those damaged should be compensated

Distributive justice

Equitable distribution is based on performance

Page 18: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing18

Basic Approaches to Ethics:Justice ApproachBasic Approaches to Ethics:Justice Approach

Procedural justice

Ensure that people consent to the decision-making process

Ensure that the process is administered impartially

Compensatory justice

If distributive and procedural justice fail, those hurt by inequitable distribution of rewards are compensated

Procedural justice

Ensure that people consent to the decision-making process

Ensure that the process is administered impartially

Compensatory justice

If distributive and procedural justice fail, those hurt by inequitable distribution of rewards are compensated

Page 19: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing19

Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision MakingMoral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making

Moral intensity

The degree to which people see an issue as an ethical one

Moral intensity

The degree to which people see an issue as an ethical one

MoralIntensity

Magnitude of the

Consequences

Concentratio

n

of Effe

ct

So

cialC

on

sequ

ences

Pro

xim

ity

TemporalImmediacy

Probability

of Effe

ct

Page 20: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing20

MoralIntensity

Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision MakingMoral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making

Magnitude of the consequences

Level of impact anticipated

Impact is independent of whether consequences are positive or negative

Magnitude of the consequences

Level of impact anticipated

Impact is independent of whether consequences are positive or negative

Magnitude of the

Consequences

Adapted from Exhibit 5.2: Factors of Moral IntensityAdapted from Exhibit 2.4

Page 21: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing21

MoralIntensity

Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision MakingMoral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making

Social consequences

The extent to which members of a society agree that an act is either good or bad

Population diversity weakens social consensus

Social consequences

The extent to which members of a society agree that an act is either good or bad

Population diversity weakens social consensus

Magnitude of the

Consequences

So

cialC

on

sequ

ences

Adapted from Exhibit 5.2: Factors of Moral IntensityAdapted from Exhibit 2.4

Page 22: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing22

MoralIntensity

Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision MakingMoral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making

Probability of effect

How likely people think the consequences are

The higher the probability of the consequence, the more intense the sense of ethical obligation

Probability of effect

How likely people think the consequences are

The higher the probability of the consequence, the more intense the sense of ethical obligation

Magnitude of the

Consequences

So

cialC

on

sequ

ences

Probability

of Effe

ct

Adapted from Exhibit 5.2: Factors of Moral IntensityAdapted from Exhibit 2.4

Page 23: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing23

MoralIntensity

Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision MakingMoral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making

Temporal immediacy

Interval between the time the action occurs and the onset of its consequences

The greater the time interval, the less intensity people typically feel toward the issue

Temporal immediacy

Interval between the time the action occurs and the onset of its consequences

The greater the time interval, the less intensity people typically feel toward the issue

Magnitude of the

Consequences

So

cialC

on

sequ

ences

TemporalImmediacy

Probability

of Effe

ct

Adapted from Exhibit 5.2: Factors of Moral IntensityAdapted from Exhibit 2.4

Page 24: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing24

MoralIntensity

Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision MakingMoral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making

Proximity

The closeness the decision maker feels to those affected

Closeness leads to more consideration of the consequences

Closeness increases feeling that it has ethical implications

Proximity

The closeness the decision maker feels to those affected

Closeness leads to more consideration of the consequences

Closeness increases feeling that it has ethical implications

Magnitude of the

Consequences

So

cialC

on

sequ

ences

Pro

xim

ity

TemporalImmediacy

Probability

of Effe

ct

Adapted from Exhibit 5.2: Factors of Moral IntensityAdapted from Exhibit 2.4

Page 25: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing25

MoralIntensity

Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision MakingMoral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making

Concentration of effect

Focus of effect on only a few or disbursed across many individuals

Higher concentration leads to feelings of greater ethical responsibility

Concentration of effect

Focus of effect on only a few or disbursed across many individuals

Higher concentration leads to feelings of greater ethical responsibility

Magnitude of the

Consequences

Concentratio

n

of Effe

ct

So

cialC

on

sequ

ences

Pro

xim

ity

TemporalImmediacy

Probability

of Effe

ct

Adapted from Exhibit 5.2: Factors of Moral IntensityAdapted from Exhibit 2.4

Page 26: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing26

How Firms Make Better Ethical DecisionsHow Firms Make Better Ethical Decisions

Code of ethics: a formal one-to-three page statement outlining the types of behavior that are and are not acceptable

Codes generally stress:

Being a good “organization citizen”

Guiding employee behavior away from unlawful or improper acts that could harm the organization

Code of ethics: a formal one-to-three page statement outlining the types of behavior that are and are not acceptable

Codes generally stress:

Being a good “organization citizen”

Guiding employee behavior away from unlawful or improper acts that could harm the organization

Page 27: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing27

Johnson & Johnson CredoJohnson & Johnson Credo

Our Credo

• We believe our first responsibility is to the doctors, nurses and patients, to mothers and fathers and all others who use our products and services. • In meeting their needs everything we do must be of high quality. • We must constantly strive to reduce our costs in order to maintain reasonable prices. • Customers' orders must be serviced promptly and accurately. • Our suppliers and distributors must have an opportunityto make a fair profit.

Our Credo

• We believe our first responsibility is to the doctors, nurses and patients, to mothers and fathers and all others who use our products and services. • In meeting their needs everything we do must be of high quality. • We must constantly strive to reduce our costs in order to maintain reasonable prices. • Customers' orders must be serviced promptly and accurately. • Our suppliers and distributors must have an opportunityto make a fair profit.

Adapted from Exhibit 2.5

Page 28: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing28

Johnson & Johnson Credo (cont.)Johnson & Johnson Credo (cont.)

• We are responsible to our employees, the men and women who work with us throughout the world. • Everyone must be considered as an individual. • We must respect their dignity and recognize their merit. • They must have a sense of security in their jobs. • Compensation must be fair and adequate, and working conditions clean, orderly and safe. • We must be mindful of ways to help our employees fulfilltheir family responsibilities. • Employees must feel free to make suggestions and complaints. • There must be equal opportunity for employment, development and advancement for those qualified. • We must provide competent management, and their actions must be just and ethical.

• We are responsible to our employees, the men and women who work with us throughout the world. • Everyone must be considered as an individual. • We must respect their dignity and recognize their merit. • They must have a sense of security in their jobs. • Compensation must be fair and adequate, and working conditions clean, orderly and safe. • We must be mindful of ways to help our employees fulfilltheir family responsibilities. • Employees must feel free to make suggestions and complaints. • There must be equal opportunity for employment, development and advancement for those qualified. • We must provide competent management, and their actions must be just and ethical.

Adapted from Exhibit 2.5

Page 29: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing29

Johnson & Johnson Credo (cont.)Johnson & Johnson Credo (cont.)

• We are responsible to the communities in which we live and work and to the world community as well. • We must be good citizens – support good works and charitiesand bear our fair share of taxes. • We must encourage civic improvements and better health and education. • We must maintain in good order the property we are privileged to use, protecting the environment and natural resources.

• We are responsible to the communities in which we live and work and to the world community as well. • We must be good citizens – support good works and charitiesand bear our fair share of taxes. • We must encourage civic improvements and better health and education. • We must maintain in good order the property we are privileged to use, protecting the environment and natural resources.

Adapted from Exhibit 2.5

Page 30: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing30

Johnson & Johnson Credo (cont.)Johnson & Johnson Credo (cont.)

• Our final responsibility is to our stockholders. • Business must make a sound profit. • We must experiment with new ideas. • Research must be carried on, innovative programs developedand mistakes paid for. • New equipment must be purchased, new facilities providedand new products launched. • Reserves must be created to provide for adverse times. • When we operate according to these principles,the stockholders should realize a fair return.

• Our final responsibility is to our stockholders. • Business must make a sound profit. • We must experiment with new ideas. • Research must be carried on, innovative programs developedand mistakes paid for. • New equipment must be purchased, new facilities providedand new products launched. • Reserves must be created to provide for adverse times. • When we operate according to these principles,the stockholders should realize a fair return.

Adapted from Exhibit 2.5

Page 31: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing31

Categories Found in Corporate Codes of EthicsCategories Found in Corporate Codes of Ethics

Cluster 1“Be a dependable

organizational citizen”

Cluster 1“Be a dependable

organizational citizen”

Cluster 2“Don’t do anything

unlawful or improper that will harm

the organization.”

Cluster 2“Don’t do anything

unlawful or improper that will harm

the organization.”

Unclustered ItemsUnclustered ItemsCluster 3

“Be good to our customers.”

Cluster 3“Be good to our

customers.”

Adapted from Exhibit 2.6

Page 32: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing32

Adoption of Codes of EthicsAdoption of Codes of Ethics

47%

18%

31%

53%

82%

69%

Germany

France

United Kingdom

With codes Without codes

Percentage of FirmsAdapted from Exhibit 2.7

Page 33: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing33

Subjects Addressed in Corporate Codes of EthicsSubjects Addressed in Corporate Codes of Ethics

Adapted from Exhibit 2.8

Employee conductEmployee conduct

Community and environmentCommunity and environment

CustomersCustomers

ShareholdersShareholders

Suppliers and contractorsSuppliers and contractors

Political interestsPolitical interests

Innovation and technologyInnovation and technology

Most often used forEuropean firms

Most often used forEuropean firms

Most often used forUnited States firmsMost often used forUnited States firms

Least often used forEuropean firms

Least often used forEuropean firms

Least often used forUnited States firms

Least often used forUnited States firms

Page 34: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing34

Successfully Implementing Codes of EthicsSuccessfully Implementing Codes of Ethics

Implementing a Code

of Ethics

Implementing a Code

of Ethics

CommunicationCommunication TrainingTraining Reward &RecognitionReward &

RecognitionWhistle-blowingWhistle-blowing

Page 35: corporate social responsibility and ethics

© 2008 Prentice-Hall Business Publishing35

The Government: Foreign Corrupt Practices ActThe Government: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Cannot corrupt actions of foreign officials, politicians, or candidates

Cannot make payments to any person when they have "reason to know" that the payments might be used to corrupt the behavior of officials

Must take steps to provide "reasonable assurance" that transactions are in compliance with the law and to keep detailed records of them

Cannot corrupt actions of foreign officials, politicians, or candidates

Cannot make payments to any person when they have "reason to know" that the payments might be used to corrupt the behavior of officials

Must take steps to provide "reasonable assurance" that transactions are in compliance with the law and to keep detailed records of them