correspondence between tolstoy and gandhi
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi
1/5
CorrespondencebetweenTolstoyandGandhi
WestminsterPalace
Hotel
4,VictoriaStreet,
LONDON,W.C.
10.11.1909.
DearSir:
Ibegtotendermythanksforyourregisteredletterinconnectionwiththeletteraddressedto
aHindu,andwiththemattersthatIdealtwithinmylettertoyou.
HavingheardaboutyourfailinghealthIrefrainedinordertosaveyouthetrouble,from
sendinganacknowledgment,knowingthatawrittenexpressionofmythankswasa
superfluousformality,butMr.AylmerMaude,whomIhavenowbeenabletomeetreassured
methatyouwerekeepingverygoodhealthindeedandthatunfailinglyandregularlyattended
toyourcorrespondenceeverymorning.Itwasverygladsomenewstome,anditencourages
metowritetoyoufurtheraboutmatterswhichare,Iknow,ofthegreatestimportance
accordingtoyourteaching.
Ibegtosendyouherewithacopyofabookwrittenbyafriend anEnglishman,whoisat
presentin
South
Africa,
in
connection
with
my
life,
insofar
as
it
has
abearing
on
the
struggle
withwhichIamsoconnected,andtowhichmylifeisdedicated.AsIamveryanxiousto
engageyouractiveinterestandsympathyIthoughtthatitwouldnotbeconsideredbyyouas
outofthewayformetosendyouthebook.
Inmyopinion,thisstruggleoftheIndiansintheTransvaalisthegreatestofmoderntimes,
inasmuchasithasbeenidealisedbothastothegoalasalsothemethodsadoptedtoreachthe
goal.Iamnotawareofastruggle,inwhichtheparticipatorsarenottoderiveanypersonal
advantageattheendofit,andinwhich50%ofthepersonsaffectedhaveundergonegreat
sufferingandtrialforthesakeofaprinciple.Ithasnotbeenpossibleformetoadvertisethe
struggleas
much
as
Ishould
like.
You
command,
possibly,
the
widest
public
today.
If
you
are
satisfiedastothefactsyouwillfindsetforthinMr.Doke'sbook,andifyouconsiderthatthe
conclusionsIhavearrivedatarejustifiedbythefacts,mayIaskyoutouseyourinfluencein
anymanneryouthinkfittopopularisethemovement?Ifitsucceeds,itwillbenotonlya
triumphofreligion,loveandtruthoverirreligion,hatredandfalsehood,butitishighlylilelyto
serveasanexampletothemillionsinIndiaandtopeopleinotherpartsoftheworldwhomay
bedowntrodden,andwillcertainlygoagreatwaytowardsbreakingupthepartyofviolence,
atleastinIndia.Ifweholdouttotheend,asIthinkwewould,Ientertainnottheslightest
doubtastotheultimatesuccess;andyourencouragementinthewaysuggestedbyyoucan
onlystrengthenusinourresolve.
-
7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi
2/5
Thenegociations[sic]thatweregoingonforasettlementofthequestionhavepractically
fallenthrough,andtogetherwithmycolleagueIreturntoSouthAfricathisweek,andinvite
imprisonment.Imayaddthatmysonhashappilyjoinedmeinthisstruggle,andisnow
undergoingimprisonmentwithhardlabourforsixmonths.Thisishisfourthimprisonmentin
thecourseofthestruggle.
Ifyouwouldbesogoodastoreplytothisletter,mayIaskyoutoaddressyourreplytomeat
Johannesburg,S.A.Box6522.
Hopingthatthiswillfindyouingoodhealth,Iremain
Yourobedientservant,
MKGandhi
*****
ToGandhi,
IHAVEjustreceivedyourveryinterestingletter,whichgavememuchpleasure.Godhelpour
dearbrothersandcoworkersintheTransvaal!Amongus,too,thisfightbetweengentleness
andbrutality,betweenhumilityandloveandprideandviolence,makesitselfevermore
stronglyfelt,especiallyinasharpcollisionbetweenreligiousdutyandtheStatelaws,
expressedbyrefusalstoperformmilitaryservice.Suchrefusalsoccurmoreandmoreoften.
Iwrotethe'LettertoaHindu',andamverypleasedtohaveittranslated.TheMoscowpeople
willletyouknowthetitleofthebookonKrishna.Asregards'rebirth'Iformypartshouldnot
omitanything,
for
Ithink
that
faith
in
are
birth
will
never
restrain
mankind
as
much
as
faith
in
theimmortalityofthesoulandindivinetruthandlove.ButIleaveittoyoutoomititifyou
wishto.Ishallbeverygladtoassistyouredition.Thetranslationanddiffusionofmywritings
inIndiandialectscanonlybeapleasuretome.
Thequestionofmonetarypaymentshould,Ithink,notariseinconnexionwithareligious
undertaking.
Igreetyoufraternally,andamgladtohavecomeintouchwithyou.
LEO
TOLSTOY.
*****
ToCountLeoTolstoy,YasnayaPolyana,Russia.
JOHANNESBURG,4thApril1910.
DearSir,
YouwillrecollectmyhavingcarriedoncorrespondencewithyouwhilstIwastemporarilyin
London.Asahumblefollowerofyours,IsendyouherewithabookletwhichIhavewritten.Itis
myown
translation
of
aGujrati
writing.
Curiously
enough,
the
original
writing
has
been
-
7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi
3/5
confiscatedbytheGovernmentofIndia.I,therefore,hastenedtheabovepublicationofthe
translation.
Iammostanxiousnottoworryyou,but,ifyourhealthpermitsitandifyoucanfindthetime
togothroughthebooklet,needlesstosayIshallvalueveryhighlyyourcriticismofthewriting.
IamsendingalsoafewcopiesofyourlettertoaHindoo,whichyouauthorisedmetopublish.
IthasbeentranslatedinoneoftheIndianlanguagesalso.
Iam,
Yourobedientservant,M.K.GANDHI.
*****
ToMahatmaGandhi.
YASNAYAPOLYANA.
8th
May
1910.
Dearfriend,
Ihavejustreceivedyourletterandyourbook,IndianHomeRule.
IreadyourbookwithgreatinterestbecauseIthinkthequestionyoutreatinit:thepassive
resistanceisaquestionofthegreatestimportance,notonlyforIndiabutforthewhole
humanity.
Icouldnotfindyourformerletters,butcameacrossyourbiographybyJ.Doss,whichtoo
interestedme
much
and
gave
me
the
possibility
to
know
and
understand
your
letter.
IamnotquitewellatpresentandthereforeabstainfromwritingtoyouallwhatIhavetosay
aboutyourbookandallyourwork,whichIappreciateverymuch,butIwilldoitassoon,asI
willfeelbetter.
Yourfriendandbrother
LeoTolstoy
*****
ToGandhi,Johannesburg,Transvaal,SouthAfrica.
KOCHETY.7thSeptember1910.
Ireceivedyourjournal,IndianOpinion,andwasgladtoseewhatitsaysofthosewho
renounceallresistancebyforce,andIimmediatelyfeltawishtoletyouknowwhatthoughts
itsperusalarousedinme.
ThelongerIliveespeciallynowwhenIclearlyfeeltheapproachofdeaththemoreIfeel
movedtoexpresswhatIfeelmorestronglythananythingelse,andwhatinmyopinionisof
immenseimportance,
namely,
what
we
call
the
renunciation
of
all
opposition
by
force,
which
reallysimplymeansthedoctrineofthelawofloveunpervertedbysophistries.Love,orin
-
7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi
4/5
otherwordsthestrivingofmen'ssoulstowardsunityandthesubmissivebehaviourtoone
anotherthatresultstherefrom,representsthehighestandindeedtheonlylawoflife,asevery
manknowsandfeelsinthedepthsofhisheart(andasweseemostclearlyinchildren),and
knowsuntilhebecomesinvolvedinthelyingnetofworldlythoughts.Thislawwasannounced
byallthephilosophies IndianaswellasChinese,andJewish,GreekandRoman.Mostclearly,I
think,wasitannouncedbyChrist,whosaidexplicitlythatonithangalltheLawandthe
Prophets.Morethanthat,foreseeingthedistortionthathashindereditsrecognitionandmay
alwayshinderit,hespeciallyindicatedthedangerofamisrepresentationthatpresentsitself
tomenlivingbyworldlyinterests namely,thattheymayclaimarighttodefendtheirinterests
byforceor,asheexpressedit,torepayblowbyblowandrecoverstolenpropertybyforce,
etc.,etc.Heknew,asallreasonablemenmustdo,thatanyemploymentofforceis
incompatiblewithloveasthehighestlawoflife,andthatassoonastheuseofforceappears
permissibleeveninasinglecase,thelawitselfisimmediatelynegatived.Thewholeof
Christiancivilization,outwardlysosplendid,hasgrownuponthisstrangeandflagrant partly
intentionalbut
chiefly
unconscious
misunderstanding
and
contradiction.
At
bottom,
however,
thelawofloveis,andcanbe,nolongervalidifdefencebyforceissetupbesideit.Andifonce
thelawofloveisnotvalid,thenthereremainsnolawexcepttherightofmight.Inthatstate
Christendomhaslivedfor1,900years.Certainlymenhavealwaysletthemselvesbeguidedby
forceasthemainprincipleoftheirsocialorder.ThedifferencebetweentheChristianandall
othernationsisonlythis:thatinChristianitythelawoflovehadbeenmoreclearlyand
definitelygiventhaninanyotherreligion,andthatitsadherentssolemnlyrecognizedit.Yet
despitethistheydeemedtheuseofforcetobepermissible,andbasedtheirlivesonviolence
sothatthelifeoftheChristiannationspresentsagreatercontradictionbetweenwhatthey
believeandtheprincipleonwhichtheirlivesarebuilt:acontradictionbetweenlovewhich
shouldpre
scribe
the
law
of
conduct,
and
the
employment
of
force,
recognized
under
various
formssuchasgovernments,courtsofjustice,andarmies,whichareacceptedasnecessaryand
esteemed.Thiscontradictionincreasedwiththedevelopmentofthespirituallifeof
Christianityandinrecentyearshasreachedtheutmosttension.
Thequestionnowis,thatwemustchooseoneoftwothingseithertoadmitthatwerecognize
noreligiousethicsatallbutletourconductoflifebedecidedbytherightofmight;orto
demandthatallcompulsorylevyingoftaxesbediscontinued,andallourlegalandpolice
institutions,andaboveall,militaryinstitutions,beabolished.
Thisspring,
at
ascripture
examination
in
aMoscow
girls'
school,
first
their
religious
teacher
andthenanarchbishopwhowasalsopresent,questionedthegirlsontheten
commandments,especiallyonthesixth.Afterthecommandmentshadbeencorrectlyrecited
thearchbishopsometimesputaquestion,usually:'Isitalwaysandineverycaseforbiddenby
thelawofGodtokill?'Andtheunfortunategirls,misledbytheirinstructor,hadtoanswerand
didanswer:'Notalways,foritispermissibleinwarandatexecutions.'When,however,this
customaryadditionalquestionwhetheritisalwaysasintokillwasputtooneofthese
unfortunatecreatures(whatIamtellingyouisnotananecdote,butactuallyhappenedand
wastoldmebyaneyewitness)thegirlcolouredupandanswereddecidedlyandwithemotion
'Always!'Anddespiteallthecustomarysophistriesofthearchbishop,sheheldsteadfastlyto
itthat
to
kill
is
under
all
circumstances
forbidden
even
in
the
Old
Testament,
and
that
Christ
hasnotonlyforbiddenustokill,butingeneraltodoanyharmtoourneighbour.The
-
7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi
5/5
archbishop,forallhismajestyandverbaldexterity,wassilenced,andvictoryremainedwiththe
girl.
Yes,wemaywriteinthepapersofourprogressinmasteryoftheair,ofcomplicated
diplomaticrelation,ofvariousclubs,ofdiscoveries,ofallsortsofalliances,andofsocalled
worksof
art,
and
we
can
pass
lightly
over
what
that
girl
said.
But
we
cannot
completely
silence
her,foreveryChristianfeelsthesame,howevervaguelyhemaydoso.Socialism,Communism,
Anarchism'SalvationArmies,thegrowthofcrime,freedomfromtoil,theincreasinglyabsurd
luxuryoftherichandincreasedmiseryofthepoor,thefearfullyrisingnumberofsuicidesare
allindicationsofthatinnercontradictionwhichmustandwillberesolved.And,ofcourse,
resolvedinsuchamannerthatthelawoflovewillberecognizedandallrelianceonforce
abandoned.YourworkintheTransvaal,whichtousseemstobeattheendoftheearth,isyet
inthecentreofourinterestandsuppliesthemostweightypracticalproof,inwhichtheworld
cannowshare,andnotonlytheChristianbutallthepeoplesoftheworldcanparticipate.
Ithink
it
will
please
you
to
hear
that
here
in
Russia,
too,
asimilar
movement
is
rapidly
attractingattention,andrefusalsofmilitaryserviceincreaseyearbyyear.Howeversmallas
yetiswithyouthenumberofthosewhorenounceallresistancebyforce,andwithusthe
numberofmenwhorefuseanymilitaryserviceboththeoneandtheothercansay:Godis
withus,andGodismightierthanman.
IntheconfessionofChristianityevenaChristianitydeformedasisthattaughtamongusanda
simultaneousbeliefinthenecessityofarmiesandpreparationstoslaughteronanever
increasingscale,thereisanobviouscontradictionthatcriestoheaven,andthatsooneror
later,butprobablyquitesoon,mustappearinthelightofdayinitscompletenakedness.That,
however,will
either
annihilate
the
Christian
religion,
which
is
indispensable
for
the
maintenanceoftheState,oritwillsweepawaythemilitaryandalltheuseofforceboundup
withitwhichtheStateneedsnoless.Allgovernmentsareawareofthiscontradiction,your
BritishasmuchasourRussian,andthereforeitsrecognitionwillbemoreenergetically
opposedbythegovernmentsthananyotheractivityinimicaltotheState,asweinRussiahave
experiencedandasisshownbythearticlesinyourmagazine.Thegovernmentsknowfrom
whatdirectionthegreatestdangerthreatensthem,andareonguardwithwatchfuleyesnot
merelytopreservetheirinterestsbutactuallytofightfortheirveryexistence.
Yoursetc.,LEOTOLSTOY.