correspondence between tolstoy and gandhi

Upload: octavio-deniz

Post on 14-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi

    1/5

    CorrespondencebetweenTolstoyandGandhi

    WestminsterPalace

    Hotel

    4,VictoriaStreet,

    LONDON,W.C.

    10.11.1909.

    DearSir:

    Ibegtotendermythanksforyourregisteredletterinconnectionwiththeletteraddressedto

    aHindu,andwiththemattersthatIdealtwithinmylettertoyou.

    HavingheardaboutyourfailinghealthIrefrainedinordertosaveyouthetrouble,from

    sendinganacknowledgment,knowingthatawrittenexpressionofmythankswasa

    superfluousformality,butMr.AylmerMaude,whomIhavenowbeenabletomeetreassured

    methatyouwerekeepingverygoodhealthindeedandthatunfailinglyandregularlyattended

    toyourcorrespondenceeverymorning.Itwasverygladsomenewstome,anditencourages

    metowritetoyoufurtheraboutmatterswhichare,Iknow,ofthegreatestimportance

    accordingtoyourteaching.

    Ibegtosendyouherewithacopyofabookwrittenbyafriend anEnglishman,whoisat

    presentin

    South

    Africa,

    in

    connection

    with

    my

    life,

    insofar

    as

    it

    has

    abearing

    on

    the

    struggle

    withwhichIamsoconnected,andtowhichmylifeisdedicated.AsIamveryanxiousto

    engageyouractiveinterestandsympathyIthoughtthatitwouldnotbeconsideredbyyouas

    outofthewayformetosendyouthebook.

    Inmyopinion,thisstruggleoftheIndiansintheTransvaalisthegreatestofmoderntimes,

    inasmuchasithasbeenidealisedbothastothegoalasalsothemethodsadoptedtoreachthe

    goal.Iamnotawareofastruggle,inwhichtheparticipatorsarenottoderiveanypersonal

    advantageattheendofit,andinwhich50%ofthepersonsaffectedhaveundergonegreat

    sufferingandtrialforthesakeofaprinciple.Ithasnotbeenpossibleformetoadvertisethe

    struggleas

    much

    as

    Ishould

    like.

    You

    command,

    possibly,

    the

    widest

    public

    today.

    If

    you

    are

    satisfiedastothefactsyouwillfindsetforthinMr.Doke'sbook,andifyouconsiderthatthe

    conclusionsIhavearrivedatarejustifiedbythefacts,mayIaskyoutouseyourinfluencein

    anymanneryouthinkfittopopularisethemovement?Ifitsucceeds,itwillbenotonlya

    triumphofreligion,loveandtruthoverirreligion,hatredandfalsehood,butitishighlylilelyto

    serveasanexampletothemillionsinIndiaandtopeopleinotherpartsoftheworldwhomay

    bedowntrodden,andwillcertainlygoagreatwaytowardsbreakingupthepartyofviolence,

    atleastinIndia.Ifweholdouttotheend,asIthinkwewould,Ientertainnottheslightest

    doubtastotheultimatesuccess;andyourencouragementinthewaysuggestedbyyoucan

    onlystrengthenusinourresolve.

  • 7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi

    2/5

    Thenegociations[sic]thatweregoingonforasettlementofthequestionhavepractically

    fallenthrough,andtogetherwithmycolleagueIreturntoSouthAfricathisweek,andinvite

    imprisonment.Imayaddthatmysonhashappilyjoinedmeinthisstruggle,andisnow

    undergoingimprisonmentwithhardlabourforsixmonths.Thisishisfourthimprisonmentin

    thecourseofthestruggle.

    Ifyouwouldbesogoodastoreplytothisletter,mayIaskyoutoaddressyourreplytomeat

    Johannesburg,S.A.Box6522.

    Hopingthatthiswillfindyouingoodhealth,Iremain

    Yourobedientservant,

    MKGandhi

    *****

    ToGandhi,

    IHAVEjustreceivedyourveryinterestingletter,whichgavememuchpleasure.Godhelpour

    dearbrothersandcoworkersintheTransvaal!Amongus,too,thisfightbetweengentleness

    andbrutality,betweenhumilityandloveandprideandviolence,makesitselfevermore

    stronglyfelt,especiallyinasharpcollisionbetweenreligiousdutyandtheStatelaws,

    expressedbyrefusalstoperformmilitaryservice.Suchrefusalsoccurmoreandmoreoften.

    Iwrotethe'LettertoaHindu',andamverypleasedtohaveittranslated.TheMoscowpeople

    willletyouknowthetitleofthebookonKrishna.Asregards'rebirth'Iformypartshouldnot

    omitanything,

    for

    Ithink

    that

    faith

    in

    are

    birth

    will

    never

    restrain

    mankind

    as

    much

    as

    faith

    in

    theimmortalityofthesoulandindivinetruthandlove.ButIleaveittoyoutoomititifyou

    wishto.Ishallbeverygladtoassistyouredition.Thetranslationanddiffusionofmywritings

    inIndiandialectscanonlybeapleasuretome.

    Thequestionofmonetarypaymentshould,Ithink,notariseinconnexionwithareligious

    undertaking.

    Igreetyoufraternally,andamgladtohavecomeintouchwithyou.

    LEO

    TOLSTOY.

    *****

    ToCountLeoTolstoy,YasnayaPolyana,Russia.

    JOHANNESBURG,4thApril1910.

    DearSir,

    YouwillrecollectmyhavingcarriedoncorrespondencewithyouwhilstIwastemporarilyin

    London.Asahumblefollowerofyours,IsendyouherewithabookletwhichIhavewritten.Itis

    myown

    translation

    of

    aGujrati

    writing.

    Curiously

    enough,

    the

    original

    writing

    has

    been

  • 7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi

    3/5

    confiscatedbytheGovernmentofIndia.I,therefore,hastenedtheabovepublicationofthe

    translation.

    Iammostanxiousnottoworryyou,but,ifyourhealthpermitsitandifyoucanfindthetime

    togothroughthebooklet,needlesstosayIshallvalueveryhighlyyourcriticismofthewriting.

    IamsendingalsoafewcopiesofyourlettertoaHindoo,whichyouauthorisedmetopublish.

    IthasbeentranslatedinoneoftheIndianlanguagesalso.

    Iam,

    Yourobedientservant,M.K.GANDHI.

    *****

    ToMahatmaGandhi.

    YASNAYAPOLYANA.

    8th

    May

    1910.

    Dearfriend,

    Ihavejustreceivedyourletterandyourbook,IndianHomeRule.

    IreadyourbookwithgreatinterestbecauseIthinkthequestionyoutreatinit:thepassive

    resistanceisaquestionofthegreatestimportance,notonlyforIndiabutforthewhole

    humanity.

    Icouldnotfindyourformerletters,butcameacrossyourbiographybyJ.Doss,whichtoo

    interestedme

    much

    and

    gave

    me

    the

    possibility

    to

    know

    and

    understand

    your

    letter.

    IamnotquitewellatpresentandthereforeabstainfromwritingtoyouallwhatIhavetosay

    aboutyourbookandallyourwork,whichIappreciateverymuch,butIwilldoitassoon,asI

    willfeelbetter.

    Yourfriendandbrother

    LeoTolstoy

    *****

    ToGandhi,Johannesburg,Transvaal,SouthAfrica.

    KOCHETY.7thSeptember1910.

    Ireceivedyourjournal,IndianOpinion,andwasgladtoseewhatitsaysofthosewho

    renounceallresistancebyforce,andIimmediatelyfeltawishtoletyouknowwhatthoughts

    itsperusalarousedinme.

    ThelongerIliveespeciallynowwhenIclearlyfeeltheapproachofdeaththemoreIfeel

    movedtoexpresswhatIfeelmorestronglythananythingelse,andwhatinmyopinionisof

    immenseimportance,

    namely,

    what

    we

    call

    the

    renunciation

    of

    all

    opposition

    by

    force,

    which

    reallysimplymeansthedoctrineofthelawofloveunpervertedbysophistries.Love,orin

  • 7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi

    4/5

    otherwordsthestrivingofmen'ssoulstowardsunityandthesubmissivebehaviourtoone

    anotherthatresultstherefrom,representsthehighestandindeedtheonlylawoflife,asevery

    manknowsandfeelsinthedepthsofhisheart(andasweseemostclearlyinchildren),and

    knowsuntilhebecomesinvolvedinthelyingnetofworldlythoughts.Thislawwasannounced

    byallthephilosophies IndianaswellasChinese,andJewish,GreekandRoman.Mostclearly,I

    think,wasitannouncedbyChrist,whosaidexplicitlythatonithangalltheLawandthe

    Prophets.Morethanthat,foreseeingthedistortionthathashindereditsrecognitionandmay

    alwayshinderit,hespeciallyindicatedthedangerofamisrepresentationthatpresentsitself

    tomenlivingbyworldlyinterests namely,thattheymayclaimarighttodefendtheirinterests

    byforceor,asheexpressedit,torepayblowbyblowandrecoverstolenpropertybyforce,

    etc.,etc.Heknew,asallreasonablemenmustdo,thatanyemploymentofforceis

    incompatiblewithloveasthehighestlawoflife,andthatassoonastheuseofforceappears

    permissibleeveninasinglecase,thelawitselfisimmediatelynegatived.Thewholeof

    Christiancivilization,outwardlysosplendid,hasgrownuponthisstrangeandflagrant partly

    intentionalbut

    chiefly

    unconscious

    misunderstanding

    and

    contradiction.

    At

    bottom,

    however,

    thelawofloveis,andcanbe,nolongervalidifdefencebyforceissetupbesideit.Andifonce

    thelawofloveisnotvalid,thenthereremainsnolawexcepttherightofmight.Inthatstate

    Christendomhaslivedfor1,900years.Certainlymenhavealwaysletthemselvesbeguidedby

    forceasthemainprincipleoftheirsocialorder.ThedifferencebetweentheChristianandall

    othernationsisonlythis:thatinChristianitythelawoflovehadbeenmoreclearlyand

    definitelygiventhaninanyotherreligion,andthatitsadherentssolemnlyrecognizedit.Yet

    despitethistheydeemedtheuseofforcetobepermissible,andbasedtheirlivesonviolence

    sothatthelifeoftheChristiannationspresentsagreatercontradictionbetweenwhatthey

    believeandtheprincipleonwhichtheirlivesarebuilt:acontradictionbetweenlovewhich

    shouldpre

    scribe

    the

    law

    of

    conduct,

    and

    the

    employment

    of

    force,

    recognized

    under

    various

    formssuchasgovernments,courtsofjustice,andarmies,whichareacceptedasnecessaryand

    esteemed.Thiscontradictionincreasedwiththedevelopmentofthespirituallifeof

    Christianityandinrecentyearshasreachedtheutmosttension.

    Thequestionnowis,thatwemustchooseoneoftwothingseithertoadmitthatwerecognize

    noreligiousethicsatallbutletourconductoflifebedecidedbytherightofmight;orto

    demandthatallcompulsorylevyingoftaxesbediscontinued,andallourlegalandpolice

    institutions,andaboveall,militaryinstitutions,beabolished.

    Thisspring,

    at

    ascripture

    examination

    in

    aMoscow

    girls'

    school,

    first

    their

    religious

    teacher

    andthenanarchbishopwhowasalsopresent,questionedthegirlsontheten

    commandments,especiallyonthesixth.Afterthecommandmentshadbeencorrectlyrecited

    thearchbishopsometimesputaquestion,usually:'Isitalwaysandineverycaseforbiddenby

    thelawofGodtokill?'Andtheunfortunategirls,misledbytheirinstructor,hadtoanswerand

    didanswer:'Notalways,foritispermissibleinwarandatexecutions.'When,however,this

    customaryadditionalquestionwhetheritisalwaysasintokillwasputtooneofthese

    unfortunatecreatures(whatIamtellingyouisnotananecdote,butactuallyhappenedand

    wastoldmebyaneyewitness)thegirlcolouredupandanswereddecidedlyandwithemotion

    'Always!'Anddespiteallthecustomarysophistriesofthearchbishop,sheheldsteadfastlyto

    itthat

    to

    kill

    is

    under

    all

    circumstances

    forbidden

    even

    in

    the

    Old

    Testament,

    and

    that

    Christ

    hasnotonlyforbiddenustokill,butingeneraltodoanyharmtoourneighbour.The

  • 7/29/2019 Correspondence Between Tolstoy and Gandhi

    5/5

    archbishop,forallhismajestyandverbaldexterity,wassilenced,andvictoryremainedwiththe

    girl.

    Yes,wemaywriteinthepapersofourprogressinmasteryoftheair,ofcomplicated

    diplomaticrelation,ofvariousclubs,ofdiscoveries,ofallsortsofalliances,andofsocalled

    worksof

    art,

    and

    we

    can

    pass

    lightly

    over

    what

    that

    girl

    said.

    But

    we

    cannot

    completely

    silence

    her,foreveryChristianfeelsthesame,howevervaguelyhemaydoso.Socialism,Communism,

    Anarchism'SalvationArmies,thegrowthofcrime,freedomfromtoil,theincreasinglyabsurd

    luxuryoftherichandincreasedmiseryofthepoor,thefearfullyrisingnumberofsuicidesare

    allindicationsofthatinnercontradictionwhichmustandwillberesolved.And,ofcourse,

    resolvedinsuchamannerthatthelawoflovewillberecognizedandallrelianceonforce

    abandoned.YourworkintheTransvaal,whichtousseemstobeattheendoftheearth,isyet

    inthecentreofourinterestandsuppliesthemostweightypracticalproof,inwhichtheworld

    cannowshare,andnotonlytheChristianbutallthepeoplesoftheworldcanparticipate.

    Ithink

    it

    will

    please

    you

    to

    hear

    that

    here

    in

    Russia,

    too,

    asimilar

    movement

    is

    rapidly

    attractingattention,andrefusalsofmilitaryserviceincreaseyearbyyear.Howeversmallas

    yetiswithyouthenumberofthosewhorenounceallresistancebyforce,andwithusthe

    numberofmenwhorefuseanymilitaryserviceboththeoneandtheothercansay:Godis

    withus,andGodismightierthanman.

    IntheconfessionofChristianityevenaChristianitydeformedasisthattaughtamongusanda

    simultaneousbeliefinthenecessityofarmiesandpreparationstoslaughteronanever

    increasingscale,thereisanobviouscontradictionthatcriestoheaven,andthatsooneror

    later,butprobablyquitesoon,mustappearinthelightofdayinitscompletenakedness.That,

    however,will

    either

    annihilate

    the

    Christian

    religion,

    which

    is

    indispensable

    for

    the

    maintenanceoftheState,oritwillsweepawaythemilitaryandalltheuseofforceboundup

    withitwhichtheStateneedsnoless.Allgovernmentsareawareofthiscontradiction,your

    BritishasmuchasourRussian,andthereforeitsrecognitionwillbemoreenergetically

    opposedbythegovernmentsthananyotheractivityinimicaltotheState,asweinRussiahave

    experiencedandasisshownbythearticlesinyourmagazine.Thegovernmentsknowfrom

    whatdirectionthegreatestdangerthreatensthem,andareonguardwithwatchfuleyesnot

    merelytopreservetheirinterestsbutactuallytofightfortheirveryexistence.

    Yoursetc.,LEOTOLSTOY.