corrigan-rightsmalthus

Upload: justin-fang

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Corrigan-RightsMalthus

    1/2

    GONZAGA 2K7 __/__FILE NAME ABE

    Rights Malthus, The Best Argument Ever.

    What is it.

    - Rights Malthus is based on the idea that the crunch is inevitable since resources are finite. The Crunch is

    multifaceted (global warming, spieces loss, overpopulation, pollution, deforestation etc.)

    - When the Crunch comes states will go authoritarian to manage resources.

    Two reasons to prefer transitioning to authoritarianism now

    - Prevents worse environmental collapse and extinction because authoritarian govs can manage resources.

    - Prevents worse authoritarian governments.

    Reasons why you should run rights malthus

    - the inevitability claim

    - you can use it to answer everything (A2 Free Trade Good, Democracy Good, Objectivism, Rights Good)- Its fun to be evil

    **Side Note

    Debate is a game. It has nothing to do with advocacy and all education is secondary.

    I have many doubts about the advantages to activism in debate but debate encourages people to win. If your going towin, you do whatever you can to win.

    Switch Sides Debate is good, you should challenge all of our assumptions.

    And youll piss people off.

    The Critique Portion

    Ultimate Liberty = Ultimate Evil.Requiem For Modern Politics.

    Win the inevitability claim and you usually win. Its a lot easier than Malthus. Generic no crunch cards bad.

    The Tech Debate.

    Tech prevents the crunch, New energy, Agriculture, Space colonization.

    - Science is decreasing

    - Human fallibility- Too Many Problems at Once

    - Heat Pollution.

    Demographic Debates

    Population Projects Fail

    - They Do Work

    - Predictions arguments link to aff

    Link Debate.

    Democracy

    - Co-opts radical change

    - No Market incentive for change

    - Cant respond to multiple problem at the same time

    Other Links

    Reproductive RightsFree Speech Rights

    Agamben/Foucault/State Bad

    Population Management

    Things You Cant Answer with Rights Malthus

    Capitalism Bad/CLS

  • 8/3/2019 Corrigan-RightsMalthus

    2/2

    GONZAGA 2K7 __/__FILE NAME ABE

    Know Your Judge

    Klinger And Greenstein good, Aldrete and Wanye Tang bad

    Sell it

    Know the effects your language have on how the judges view your argument.

    - For example, Not Death Check but Population Check or Population Correction Not advocating killing people;No Sir! Just not helping them.

    - Be Professional! No one likes goony Malthus debaters. But dont back down! If you treat the argument like a badone, the judge will evaluate it like a bad one

    Common Arguments

    Its Racist

    A) Inevitability/Worse Authoritarianism

    B) Future GenerationsC) Generic Consequences Good (David Cummiskey,Kantian Consequentialism)

    D) Promoting Democracy is Racist

    Leaders wont Change

    FIRST, IT DOESNT MATTER HOW BAD THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION IS FOR THE

    ENVIRONMENT

    A) THE ELECTIONS IN 2008 WONT BE SUSPENDED EVEN IF AMERICA BECOMES LESSDEMOCRATIC BUSH CANT RUN AGAIN

    B) THE CRUNCH FORCES CHANGE EVEN IF THE GOVERNMENT ISNT ENVIRONMENTALIST IT

    WILL SOMEDAY BE FORCED TO RESPOND TO THE CRUNCH. AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENTS

    WILL RESPOND MORE EFFECTIVELY

    C) CONDITIONING WE HAVE TO END THE CULTURE OF INDIVIDUALISM TO SURVIVE, AS PER

    OUR OPHULS EVIDENCE ANY AUTHORITARIANISM WILL HELP PREPARE US FOR SACRIFICE

    EVEN IF CHANGE IS UNLIKELY, VOTE NEGSOCIETY WILL EVENTUALLY CHANGE WHENCONDITIONS BECOME INTOLERABLEAUTHORITARIAN SOCIETIES WILL SIMPLY BE MORE

    EFFECTIVE

    AUTHORITARIANSPOLLUTETHEENVIRONMENT

    THIS DOESNT APPLY THE FAILURE OF PAST REGIMES TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT

    DOESNT ANSWER RIGHTS MALTHUS

    A) HISTORY ALL OF THEIR EXAMPLES OCCURRED IN A TIME OF WORLD-WIDEINDUSTRIALIZATION. SINCE INFRASTRUCTURE ALREADY EXISTS, FUTURE REGIMES WONT NEED

    RAPID, DIRTY GROWTH

    B) SPEED EVEN IF AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENTS ARE BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT IN SOME

    WAYS, THE CRUNCH IS INEVITABLE REGARDLESS. AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENTS ARE MORE

    SUITED TO EMERGENCY RESPONSE

    C) TRY OR DIE ALL OF OUR DEMOCRACY BAD ARGS APPLY DEMOCRACIES ARE CAUSING THECRUNCH, BUT THERES AT LEAST A RISK THAT AUTHORITARIANISM SOLVES

    PAST ENVIRONMENTAL FAILURES DONT PROVE THAT AUTHORITARIANISM IS BAD

    AUTHORITARIAN STATES GET RESULTS