corruptocrat eric holder’s national security cover-up

8/14/2019 Corruptocrat Eric Holders national security cover-up

1/15

Corruptocrat Eric Holder s national security cover-upBy Michelle Malkin February 24, 2010 09:07 AM

My column pounds aga in on Eric Holder over his jihadi lawyer

stonewalling. Question: Where s Mass. GOP Sen. Scott Brown? Remember

when he made t h i s one of his key campaign agenda items and carried the

banner on the issue during his election night speech:

And let me say this, with respect to those who wish to harm us, I believethat our Constitution and laws exist to protect this nation they do not

grant rights and privileges to enemies in wartime. In dea l i ng w i th

t e r ro r i s t s , ou r t ax do l l a r s shou ld pay fo r weapons t o s t op t hem,

no t l awye r s t o de f end t hem.

Get on it.

AskDOJ@usdo j . gov

U.S. Depar tmen t of Jus t ice

950 Pennsy lvan i a Avenue , NW

Wash ing ton , DC 20530 -0001

Off i ce o f the A t to rney Gene ra l Pub l i c Com men t L ine 202 -35 3 -

1 5 5 5

Related must-read: A n d y M c C a r t h y on the Gitmo 9 and the DOJ cave of

darkness.

2nd related must-read: John Yoo i n t he WSJ My Gi f t t o t he Obama

Pre s idency.

***

Corruptocrat Eric Holder s national security cover-up

by Michelle Malkin

Crea to r s Synd i ca t e

Copyright 2010

The White House wants to play Transparency Olympics with the Tea Party

movement. President Obama s Chief Technology Officer Andrew McLaughlin

dared Tea Party activists and conservatives last week to push the

administration to make its policies more open and make it a political

competition to see who can be more radical in their openness, The Hill

reported. So, let s start by knocking down Attorney General Eric Holder s

national security stonewall at the Department of Justice, shall we? Let the

sun shine in.
http://www.creators.com/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704188104575083473537079844.htmlhttp://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MmYzNzM5ZmJiMWQ3N2U1YmU0YzYwZWU2NGFmNDdkOTk=http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2010/01/025431.phphttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/22/corruptocrat-ag-eric-holder-still-covering-up/http://michellemalkin.com/sitemap/http://michellemalkin.com/http://www.flickr.com/photos/39049221@N00/http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MichelleMalkin/http://feeds.feedburner.com/michellemalkin/postshttp://michellemalkin.com/archives/http://michellemalkin.com/contact/http://michellemalkin.com/about/


2/15

For more than a year, I ve been writing about the looming national security

and conflict-of-interest problems posed by Holder s status as former partner

at prestigious law firm Covington and Burling. The company currently

represents or has provided pro bono representation and sob-story media

relations campaigns in the past to more than a dozen Gitmo detainees from

Yemen who are seeking civilian trials on American soil.

The firm wasn t just a bit player. It led the charge contributing more than

3,000 hours on Gitmo litigation in 2007, according to The American

Lawyer. At least one known Covington & Burling bigshot and fellow former

Clintonite, Lanny Breuer, now works for Holder as head of the DOJ s criminal

division. Though he himself did not participate in the detainee cases,

Holder s celebrity undoubtedly boosted company-wide prestige.

How many of Holder s former colleagues and associates are now on the DOJ

payroll? How many like them who worked at other law firms or left-wing

lobbying groups now inhabit DOJ offices? How many of them have been

allowed to work on government terrorism cases related to their past

crusading for al Qaeda-tied clients? How many have had to recuse

themselves and have those recusals been full and forthcoming? How can

the public judge whether these lawyers are truly representing America s

best interests or the jiahdis ?

GOP Sen. Charles Grassley has been trying to get answers. He has been

snubbed repeatedly by the information suppressors at DOJ. As the Washington Examiner s Byron York reported on Friday, Holder has now

acknowledged that at least nine Obama appointees in the Justice

Department have represented or advocated for terrorist detainees before

joining the Justice Department. But the tight-lipped, tax payer-funded

litigators at the agency won t name names or cough up any relevant details.

Sen. Grassley had asked for the names of political appointees in your

department who represent detainees or who work for organizations

advocating on their behalf the cases or projects that these appointees work

with respect to detainee prior to joining the Justice Department and the

cases or projects relating to detainees that have worked on since joining the

Justice Department. Beyond two DOJ appointees whose work for jihadi

defendants had already been made public, Holder gave up nothing. Zip.Zilch.

I t s not even clear that the unnamed Gitmo Nine are the end of the line. The

list is not a comprehensive tally of DOJ appointees, Holder told Grassley and

other GOP senators who pressed for public disclosure. Why not? What are

they trying to hide? Who are they trying to spare?

Americans have a right to know whether they are subsidizing jihadi

sympathizers and whether their Justice Department is now a sanctuary for

human rights transnationalists and little terrorists helpers in the mold of

Lynne Stewart, who was convicted of abetting Muslim terrorist mastermind

Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman and spreading messages inciting violence on his

behalf while representing him.

Americans have a right to know whether Holder who put political interests

ahead of security interests at the Clinton Justice Department in both the

Marc Rich pardon scandal and the Puerto Rican FALN terrorist debacle

has made hiring decisions that provide the common defense and promote

the general welfare.

Tellingly, Holder has treated the GOP s national security concerns

dismissively. He s hoping his non-response blow-off of Sen. Grassley s

request dies on the vine. And just as he used his own past lapses in judgment

during the Clinton era to argue that they made him more qualified for the

job he holds now, Holder argues that the phantom jihadi lawyers on the DOJ

payroll are a good thing for the country, so we should just shut up:

A prosecutor of white-collar fraud cases may have previously represented

defendants in such cases. This familiarity with and experience in the

relevant area of law redounds to the government s benefit.

As usual, Holder puts ordinary civilian crimes on the same footing as

terrorism plots and acts of war against our country. But why not let the

people decide for themselves whether his staff decisions redound to their


3/15

benefit? The American people have the right to information about their

government s activities, Holder himself said in a press release trumpeting

new freedom of information rules last year. Put up or shut up, Mr. Attorney

General.

See what others have saidNote from Michelle: This section is for comments from

michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume

that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it

stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply w ith my t e rms o f u se may

lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Tr a c k b a c k U R L

Comments

Posted in: Cor rup t ion , Eric Holder , G i t m o

P r i n t e r F r i e n d l y

comments (51) trackbacks (8)

n Obama Economy Managem en t s e t s new US Reco rd !

Vo t i ngFema le

n Links To Vi s i t 02/24/10 NoisyRoom.net : Where l iber ty d w e l l s , t h e r e i s m y c o u n t r y

n Wh a t Sho r t Memor i e s They Have

n Mus t Know Head l i ne s 2 . 25 .2010 E x p o s e T h e M e d i a . c o m

n The Snoope r Repo r t

n Mic he l l e Ma lk in Break ing down co r rup toc r a t AG Er i cHo lde r s s t onewa l l

n Who Has E r i c Ho lde r Pu t I n Cha rge Of P rosecu t i ng Te r ro r i sm Ta i -Ch i Po l i cy

n Mic he l l e Ma lk in The l a t e s t on t he Ho lde r /DOJ na t i ona ls e c u r i t y c o v e r - u p

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:13 am, d 1 c a r t e r said:

Eric Holder has got to go and take his jihadi defenders with him.

# 1

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:17 am, c a b r e r s k i said:

One day (in my fantasy w orld), attempts to cover up political mistakes by

claiming national defense will be met with a term of no less than 5 years in

prison. This will include all refusals of Freedom of Information properly

requested and ruled as such.

Some issues do require protection political emabarassments do not.

# 2

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:23 am, g r a y s o n r e t said:

As most liberals believe, policy is based on feeling good , rather than

logic. Consequences aren t taken into consideration; they have to think for

that. This is why our country is in such a turmoil today.

# 3

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:27 am, S a v a g e 2 4 said:

How many Republican Senators voted for h is appointment to AG? All these

Senators need to go, we can t afford to keep them. Everybody knew this

idiot was a left wing activist, but in our corrupt government, they didn t

give a damn.Now be are stuck with a racist and corrupt DOJ.

# 4

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:30 am, m a l k i n _ f a n said:

Let s just hope the next administration has the BALLS to release to the

public the info and then charge holder with all the crimes he is committing

against America.

# 5

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:33 am, h a p p y s c r a p p e r said:

How can anyone have any trust or confidence in their government when it

is riddled with disgusting cockroaches like Eric Holder? Holder is just one

# 6
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895391http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895390http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895389http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895388http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895386http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895384http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/trackback/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/the-latest-on-the-holderdoj-national-security-cover-up/http://taoist.wordpress.com/2010/03/01/who-has-eric-holder-put-in-charge-of-prosecuting-terrorism/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/26/breaking-down-corruptocrat-ag-eric-holders-stonewall/http://www.snooperreport.com/snooper-report/2010/2/26/stuff-i-missed-yesterday-health-care-security-global-lunacy.htmlhttp://exposethemedia.com/2010/02/25/must-know-headlines-2-25-2010/http://mysquawk.com/wordpress/?p=680http://noisyroom.net/blog/2010/02/24/links-to-visit-022410/http://votingfemale.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/obama-economy-management-sets-new-us-record/http://michellemalkin.com/terms-of-use/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/?print=1http://michellemalkin.com/category/war/gitmo/http://michellemalkin.com/category/politics/eric-holder/http://michellemalkin.com/category/politics/corruption/


4/15

example of many whom Obama has chosen to be in charge of the United

States of America. These people didn t just show up and accidentally get

past the vettin g process. Obama sought them out, and, knowing their

background full well, wanted them to be in his administration. This is what

we have come to at this point in our history. Look around at what kind of

corruption is currently permeating the WH. Picture every one of Obama s

thugs in mafia garb, including the POTUS himself. They are straight out of

Central Casting. There will be no justice in this country until this corrupt

administration is toast. If we can t get rid of them before they destroy us,

there will be civil war here once again. I see no o ther choice.

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:35 am, A r i z o n a N e a n d e r t h a l said:

As vile a person as the Attorney General is he is but doing what President

Obama promised his fellow travelers during the campaign. Their hatred for

all thing Bush and sympathy for terrorist/revolutionaries of every stripe

made all this a given.

If not for a fear of a horrible public backlash they would embrace the

jihadist. I am still amazed at New York s reaction to the trials it was what

Obama promised.

# 7

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:43 am, f l m o m said:

Eric Holder is not having a good news day:

h t t p : / / on l i ne .ws j . com/a r t i c l e /SB10001424052748704188104575083473537079844 .h tml

Michelle, I think you need to expand each chapter in Culture of Corruption

into separate volumes. There s so much material.

# 8

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:45 am, J o h n n y D said:

Well said happyscrapper!

+1000

# 9

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:33 am, happyscrapper said:

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:48 am, s w e d e said:

Given the choice, I rather suspect he will go with the latter. These folks are

about as transparent as a brick.

# 10

Put up or shut up, Mr. Attorney General.

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:54 am, n o v a c u l u s said:

Time to waterboard Eric Holder and make him talk.

I have some other questions for him too, starting with the Black Panther

thug voter intimidation dismissals.

I volunteer for this duty.

# 11


Why, thank you!

# 12

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:45 am, JohnnyD said: Well said happyscrapper!+1000

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:58 am, A r i z o n a N e a n d e r t h a l said:

# 13

f l m o m said:

E r i c Ho lde r i s no t hav in g a good news day :
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704188104575083473537079844.htmlhttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895402http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895401http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895397http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895396http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895395http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704188104575083473537079844.htmlhttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895393http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895392


5/15

John Yoo has some stones and actually knows of which he speaks

anathema to Liberals of every stripe. When Obama and his Attorney

General spoke of punishing the lawyers who advised President Bush John

Yoo was their primary focus; his is just ano the r banana wande r ing o ff

t he p l an t a t i on . Faculty at University of California, Berkeley HATE Mr.

Yoo but his classes are immensely popular with the students.

On February 24th, 2010 at 10:13 am, f l m o m said:

Yoo didn t waste any time coming out swinging. He must have been

smoldering throughout this whole witch hunt.

# 14

ArizonaNeanderthal

On February 24th, 2010 at 10:18 am, s t i l l o n t h e r o a d said:

I see it as this they could not care less, they do not care. They do not

care what the majority of Americans think, they only care about the

agenda they have formulated over the last 30 or 40 years and capitalizing

on the groundwork laid out in past years.

# 15

On February 24th, 2010 at 10:31 am, Fl y o v e r m a n said:

Meanwhile back at the newsroom, the MSM continues to send morepasses in the direction of the Obama administration then the total of all

pass attempts this year by NFL quarterbacks.

I truly believe that if the Obama Administration set up a Buchenwald, the

MSMs response would be, Smell? I don t smell anything coming from

there. Smoke, what smoke?

Their complicity is truly disgusting.

# 16

On February 24th, 2010 at 11:54 am, M a r c said:

It is a mistake to think that the lawyers at Covington and Burling are

motivated primarily by ideology. They are motivated primarily by a need

for adventure, by a need to be cool and hip and with it. The lawyers at

Covington and Burling don t do anything exciting or dangerous in their

daily lives. You can t brag at the country club about nearly being hit with a

falling easel at the FDIC hearing office. But you can brag about going down

to Gitmo, wearing your battle fatigues and shades and talking smack to US

soldiers, who have to be polite. Then the Covington and Burling lawyers

have lots of adventures to tell their staid friends down at the boat basin.

The usual chatter at Covington and Burling is about the America s Cup

yacht racing or who was elected chairman at th e Greenwich yacht club.

But going down to Gitmo, putting on the khaffiyeh and standing shoulder

to shoulder with Khalid Sheikh Muhammed, now you re cooking. These

lawyers have total disdain for the American soldiers that are at Gitmo. But

they have a romantic view of the terrorists that are there. And what stories

to tell the C&B lawyers who stayed in Washington and didn t get down with

the struggle.

# 18


The MSM is paying for their treason every day. They are losing audience

and money in droves. They will be punished even more as these stories

unfold and they will realize they have taken part in what is happening.

# 19

Their complicity is truly disgusting.

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:18 pm, g r e e n f a i r i e said:

There s a particular kind of person who makes a living defending terrorists

and other kinds of depraved scumbags. It goes beyond the standard issue

criminal defense attorney whose clients are drunk drivers, shoplifters, and

burglars. We re talking about the kind of person who got drawn to

rebellious lawyering, the middle-aged guy who s got the ponytail or the

old radical chick with the mannish hairdo. These people are committed

# 20
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895556http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895525http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895520http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895432http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895422http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895417http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/23/the-old-coconut-smear-another-white-liberal-bigmouth-with-race-issues/


6/15

ideologues, always out for the underdog. Now, Marc in the above post

may have a point: some of it is fun and adventure for these kooks. But you

have to be a kook to begin with. Otherwise, Covington s got you doing the

boring corporate/government crap. I ve worked in the D.C. legal biz.

Every big prestige firm has its activist wing, and many of those activists

are leftists.

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:22 pm, z y z z y g said:

With regard to Sen Elect Brown s statement, like it or not, Military

Tribunals or Civilian Trials, we the taxpayers will be pay for the terrorists

lawye rs. Further, we are currently paying for the killing and capturing

terrorists.

Sen Grasley s question are good, and he should get answers.

Questions like the following have obvious answers -

How ca n the public judge w hether these lawy ers are truly r epresenting

America s best interests or the jiahdis ?

Because the lawyers are sworn to uphold the l aw. We are a Nation of laws.

We are civilized.

A lawyer advocates for their client and are subject to sanctions when they

violate that principle (law). Yep, a lawyer could advocate for a drunk

driver one day, and then advocate for a victim of a drunk driver the next.

It is our system.

# 21

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:22 pm, Ty 8 5 7 1 9 said:

I am sure this guy and his cohorts have committed some sort of crime in

their sha dy, dou ble-dealings within this Gitmo debacle can anyone say,

conflict of interest?

# 22

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:23 pm, A l o h a G u y said:

So far, this applies to all of the Obama administration and his past

# 23

What are they trying to hide?

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:25 pm, A l o h a G u y said:

You a re lgm s little brother.

# 24

How can the public judge whether these lawyers are truly representing America s best interests or the jiahdis ?

Because the lawyers are sworn to uphold the law. We are a Nation of laws. We are civilized.

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:27 pm, J v e t t e said:

This is all part and parcel of the liberals view of terrorists and terrorism as

a nuisance and not as acts of war.

When Kerry said it outright in the 2004 elections he was rightly blasted. It

was too much truth too soon after 9/11.

What they are doing now is conditioning the American people to accept

their view.

# 25

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:47 pm, i n f i d e l 4 l i f e said:

Gawd I wanna hurl. Absolutely unreal that a lying crook like Holder is the

top prosecutor in the US of A. Not to mention the traitor in the white

house. How far we have fallen.

# 26Mr. Attorney General.
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895587http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895565http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895563http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895562http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895559http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895558


7/15


Nope. Not true. And as usual the facts of my statement, that you cut and

pasted, were not challenged, or proven incorrect.

# 27

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:25 pm, AlohaGuy said: #24

You are lgm s little brother.

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:51 pm, g r a n i t e said:

I ve thought for some time that that poster is nothing more than yet

another new personality of old Sybil.

That poster s comments remind me of a cartoon about Kurt Waldheim that

came out about 25 or so years ago, when:

Link: h t t p : / /www.answer s . com/ top i c /ku r t -wa ldhe im

The cartoon had Waldheim and a few other Wehrmacht and ?SS? officers

standing near an airplane, looking at some documents/reports.

Waldheim s character says, It vould be wrong, dat s for zure.

One of the other officers replies, Oh, shut up, Waldheim!

Sometimes, that simple three-word expression wants to be uttered in reply

to Sybil s posts.

# 28

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:25 pm, AlohaGuy said:

You are lgm s little brother.

His [Waldneim's} candidacy [for president of Austria] becamecontroversial when the dissemination of wartime and postwardocuments pointed to his having been part of a German army unitthat had deported most of the Jewish population of the Greek townof Salonika to Nazi death camps in 1943.

On February 24th, 2010 at 1:19 pm, Fl y o v e r m a n said:

Z is correct. They are. You know like William Kunstler.

# 29

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:22 pm, zyzzyg said:

Because the lawyers are sworn to uphold the law.


Yeah.

And Lynne Stewart.

Riiiigghhtt!

Fool.

(Not you, Flyover!)

# 30

On February 24th, 2010 at 1:19 pm, Flyoverman said:

On February 24th, 2010 at 1:40 pm, A l o h a G u y said: # 31

And as usual the facts of my statement, that you cut and pasted, were not challenged, or proven incorrect.
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895634http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895628http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895619http://www.answers.com/topic/kurt-waldheimhttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895593http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895589


8/15

I left some out for my little joke, but ok you claim the obvious answer is

that lawyers are sworn to uphold the law, so they couldn t possibly be

representing the jiahdis best interests. So I mocked you. You ve never

heard of dishonest lawyers? Lawyers who lie about their interests?

Lawyers who take a public-sector job to influence the business at the firm

where they will return as partners one day? Lawyers with ideological

reasons to obfuscate?

If you are not in fact an actual child, you need to work on y our reasoning

skills. Childish reasoning in a dangerous world is a risk for all of us.

Questions like the following have obvious answers -

How can the public judge whether these lawyers are truly representing America s best interests or the jiahdis ?


On February 24th, 2010 at 1:48 pm, G o r e b o t said:

Reading John Yoo s article almost (and quite perversely) leaves me

wishing for Obambi to get re-elected in 20 12.

Why? So he can directly suffer the consequences of the abject treason and

incompetence he is actively promulgating in his current term.

The way things are degrading now, the more likely outcome is that

Obambi s successor will have to deal with the catastrophic debris which

will inevitably occur due to Obambi s present treachery.

# 32

On February 24th, 2010 at 2:39 pm, F i r s t S k i r t said:

I say again, Holder takes h is orders directly from Obeyme and he is his

most de voted s ervant. In addition to his obfuscation of his cronies at the

law firm, Holder is a die-hard progressive with the NRA and the 2nd

Amendments on his hit list. This entire administration has been given its

mission statement: destruction of the Constitution of the U.S. We must be

prepared to fight back, literally.

# 33

On February 24th, 2010 at 4:50 pm, h a p p y s c r a p p e r said:

Get your head out of your a$$, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! That was just plain dumb.

You can t possibly believe that lawyers are civilized!! Have you ever talked

to Chap?? Most lawyers have been taken over by zombies from Iceland.

# 36Because the lawyers are sworn to uphold the law. We are a Nation of laws. We are civilized.

On February 24th, 2010 at 4:57 pm, h a p p y s c r a p p e r said:

Don t forget John (commit adultry while your wife has cancer, have a love

child, deny your own child, have someone else take the blame) Edwards.

Yeah, lawyers are just the models of virtue and integrity. Spit.

# 37

On February 24th, 2010 at 12:22 pm, zyzzyg said:


On February 24th, 2010 at 1:19 pm, Flyoverman said:Z is correct. They are. You know like William Kunstler

On February 24th, 2010 at 6:44 pm, z y z z y g said: # 38

On February 24th, 2010 at 1:40 pm, AlohaGuy said: #31

I left some out for my little joke, but ok you claim the obviousanswer is that lawyers are sworn to uphold the law, so they couldn tpossibly be representing the jiahdis best interests. So I mocked
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895774http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895754http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895752http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895685http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895647


9/15

Not only are you now still not challenging the facts, but you are now hiding

behind saying that you were joking. Who s being childish?

What is childish is saying the second time around is that you were only

kidding, joking, ya know . . . in your first response to my post. If you are joking say so at the time and/or make it more obvious.

NO. The lawyers are representing the jihadi s best interest . . . when they

are clients. And now, the lawyers are representing the best interest of the

Justice Department . . . who they work for, presently.

Yes, there are dishonest lawyers and my original post (#21) says that they

face sanctions for violating the law. Among the questions being asked by

Sen Grassley do not include whether the lawyers being discussed are

dishohest, or lying. Though I think those questions are fair to ask, as well.

I like questions being asked and answered.

Reasoning skills are a non-issue, the facts are the issue and you have yet to

adequately challenge the facts.

Is what I said untrue? If so, prove it. Or, just agree with me. Lawyers do

their jobs with the interests of their clients (or employers) first, or face

sanctions.

you. You ve never heard of dishonest lawyers? Lawyers who lieabout their interests? Lawyers who take a public-sector job toinfluence the business at the firm where they will return as partnersone day? Lawyers with ideological reasons to obfuscate?If you are not in fact an actual child, you need to work on yourreasoning skills. Childish reasoning in a dangerous world is a risk forall of us.


OK, a bit of humor. LOL.

But, you are supposed to be ignoring me. Aren t you a person of your

word? Believe your own posts?

Ummmm, since you are violating your suggestion that I should be

ignored, saying something is dumb, is not an intelligent argument. How

about challenging the facts of my statement?

# 39

On February 24th, 2010 at 4:50 pm, happyscrapper said: #36

Get your head out of your a$$, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! That was just plain

dumb. You can t possibly believe that lawyers are civilized!! Have you ever talked to Chap?? Most lawyers have been taken over by zombies from Iceland.


Two posts? Two posts, back to back, referencing me? So much for ignoring

me, and saying this blog is not about me. You are making it about me.

When will you take you own words to heart, and actually ignore me?

I never said, lawyers are the models of virtue and integrity. My original

post said they would face sanctions for violating the law.

Cmon, just admit you agree. It will you do you some good.

# 40

On February 24th, 2010 at 4:57 pm, happyscrapper said: #37

Don t forget John (commit adultry while your wife has cancer, havea love child, deny your own child, have someone else take the

blame) Edwards. Yeah, lawyers are just the models of virtue andintegrity. Spit.

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895781http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895777http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895776


10/15

Thank you for agreeing.

Absolutely, like Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Yoo, Bibby, Gonzales, Mukasey,

Ashcroft, etc. Lawyers all.

I am not suggesting that all lawyers are models of integrity and virture. In

all professions there are the good, the bad and the ugly.

On February 24th, 2010 at 1:19 pm, Flyoverman said: #29

Z is correct. They are. You know like William Kunstler.

On February 24th, 2010 at 7:27 pm, D a v e Tu r s o n said:

Holder s choice of music reveals a wild, childlike mindset. The LSD druggy

anthem Purple Haze is one of his favorite songs. Hendrix had outgrown it

and was sick of the gimmickry of his career by the time of his death at age

27 . W e r e i n t r oub l e Holder i s 59:

# 42

Americans have a right to know whether Holder who put politicalinterests ahead of security interests at the Clinton JusticeDepartment in both the Marc Rich pardon scandal and the PuertoRican FALN terrorist debacle has made hiring decisions thatprovide the common defense and promote the general welfare.

on January 31st, Senator Lamar Alexander, of Tennessee,declared on Fox News that Holder should step down, for hisinability to make a distinction between terrorists who are flyinginto Detroit, blowing up planes, and American citizens who arecommitting a crime. On January 11th, a few weeks before his plansfor a trial at Foley Square fell apart, Holder flew to Boston, topreside over the installation of a new U.S. Attorney. T h a teven ing , he r e tu rned t o W ash ing ton i n t he Ju s t i c eD e p a r t m e n t s Gu l f s t r e am j e t . Ho lde r, who had j ok ing ly l a m e n t e d t h a t s u c h p e r k s w o u l d n t las t forever I m

miss ing i t a l r e ady ! s a t down , pu t on headphones , and b las ted one of h is favor i te songs , J im i Hendr ix s Purp l eHaze . Holder, w ho is f i f ty-n in e , seemed determined not to letthe tensions of Washington politics poison his mood. He was equally determined not to capitulate on the idea of holding a 9/11 trial. Idon t apologize for what I ve done, he told me at one point.History will show that the decisions we ve made are the right ones. Holder said that he regarded trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in acourtroom as the defining event of my time as Attorney General. But, he added, between now and then I suspect we re in for someinteresting times.

On February 24th, 2010 at 7:36 pm, M a j o r O said:

This.is.going.to.hurt, but

I actually agree with what I think Z is trying to say. That is, I get where

he (or she?) is coming from.

Lawyers represent their clients before the bar and if they commit some

illegal act while doing so, they face punishment for it.

That said, I totally feel what others are saying, to wit: why do we have a

(growing?) cadre of lawyers who always seem willing even EAGER to run

off and defend every Tom, Dick, and Abdul terrorist, according them the

same rights as US citizens? To many of us, it seems that this is beyond

trying to ensure a fair trial for the accused and more like sticking it to the

US for some as yet unexpressed dislike for the country. What is it that

drives this desire to seemingly always side with our enemies? (By side I

mean, a disposition to explain away their evil)

# 43


On February 24th, 2010 at 7:36 pm, Major O said: #43
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895812http://soliver.typepad.com/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895794http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/02/15/100215fa_fact_mayerhttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895792


11/15

Thank you.

The truth should not hurt. The truth shall set you free.

For the money. Public defenders are given a stipend to do the work. Yes,

the words pro bono are often mentioned, but all that means is that instead

of $1,200 per hour they are getting $200 per hour, paid for by us, the

taxpayers.

And, it isn t about the same rights , it is about how we conduct ouselves as

a nation. Could we make all of Afghanistan inhabitable for the next 1,000

years? Could we depopulate Iran? Iraq? Like it or not, we are a goodpeople and like all civilized nations we conduct war according to

established rules. Yep, I am laughing too. Such an oxymoron.

Yes, we have the final solution , for every foreign issue, in our back pocket

but we practice self restraint. I think that is a good thing. Though I am glad

there are others to hold me back.

Believe me, I get it, too.

It says more about us than it does about them, that we aren t going around

incinerating people. It says more about us when we help Indonesia after a

Tsunami, or Haiti after an eartquake.

Our better angels are always standing ready to be judged, even though

sometimes we (and I) believe that we should kick butt, write down names,

and let Allah sort them out.

I get it. We have rules, laws and societal ethics.

This.is.going.to.hurt, but

I actually agree with what I think Z is trying to say. That is, I get where he (or she?) is coming from.Lawyers represent their clients before the bar and if they commitsome illegal act while doing so, they face punishment for it.

That said, I totally feel what others are saying, to wit: why do wehave a (growing?) cadre of lawyers who always seem willing evenEAGER to run off and defend every Tom, Dick, and Abdul terrorist,according them the same rights as US citizens?

To many of us, it seems that this is beyond trying to ensure a fairtrial for the accused and more like sticking it to the US for some as

yet unexpressed dislike for the country. What is it that drives thisdesire to seemingly always side with our enemies? (By side Imean, a disposition to explain away their evil)


Ummm .

I still like to listen to Purple Haze more than 40 years after it came out

even have it as the ringer on my cell phone from time to time.

And, I am quite a boring person I ve never done any drugs.

And I think that Holder is a member of the domestic enemy cadre.

But, what does a song have to do with the mortal, existential danger

America presently faces?

# 45

On February 24th, 2010 at 7:27 pm, Dave Turson said:

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:48 pm, b l u e s o c said:

The reason these lawyers represent Gitmo detainees is because they re

high profile cases and give them a lot of publicity, which results in more

# 46
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895820http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895818


12/15

clients and more money.

The reason they take jobs with the DOJ is because it s uber prestigious and

they make a lot more money when they return to private practice.

I t s as simple as that.

On February 24th, 2010 at 9:50 pm, W a r E a g l e8 2 said:

Can you imagine how WW2 might have turned out if the DoJ had 9 or more

lawyers on staff that had represented members of the German Nazi Party

before they declared war on us?

# 47

On February 24th, 2010 at 10:52 pm, D a v e Tu r s o n said:

I m sure the writer put this music incident in her piece because it was

revealing as to his character or take on life. I bought several Hendrix

albums in the 70s. Hendrix s music was becoming mellower as he aged.

Biographers have shown he no longer wanted to burn and bang guitars. To

my mind, Acid rock on a favorites list of an AG who is 59 years old is

weird.

# 48On February 24th, 2010 at 9:22 pm, granite said:I still like to listen to Purple Haze more than 40 years after it cameout. And I think that Holder is a member of the domestic enemy cadre. But, what does a song have to do with the mortal, existentialdanger America presently faces?

On February 24th, 2010 at 11:16 pm, M a r c said:

Before bashing all lawyers, I need to remind people that my hero and a

man who would have and still would be a great president is a lawyer. His

name is Edwin Meese.

He is still younger than President Reagan was in his second term so he is

still perfectly suited for a run for the presidency.

# 49

On February 24th, 2010 at 11:31 pm, j a n g a r said:

I beg to differ. They are more interested in prosecuting the pro-life and

one-man-one-woman marriage proponents than they are Islamic jihadists.

I t s indeed a culture war their war on people of faith, prosperity and

freedom.

# 50

As usual, Holder puts ordinary c iv i l i an c r imes on the samefooting as terrorism plots and acts of war against our country.

On February 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm, V n t n r s e said:

I will not caste my vote for any presidential candidate that will not

prosecute to the fullest extent of the law each and every member of Obama s administration! If ANY presidential candidate states that they will

prosecture I will closely consider them. If ANY candidate states that they

will NOT they have just lost my vote!

# 51

On February 25th, 2010 at 12:05 am, V n t n r s e said:

prosecute! not prosecture .

(slapping my sself in the forehead)

sheesh!

# 52

On February 25th, 2010 at 8:42 am, E L I N V E S T I 8 said:

T h i s a d m i n i s tr a t io n a n d e v e r y o n e i n i t f r om t h e t o p d o w n a r e p a r t o f a b o i l in g n e s t o f v i p e r s t h a t d e s t r o y t h i s c o u n t r y e v e r y

d a y t h e y a r e i n o f fi c e. W h a t p a r t o f W e d o n o t w a n t t o b e a

s o c i a l is t c o u n t r y d o n t t h e y g e t ? Ta k e t h e m d a m n e d e a r p l u g s

o u t o f y o u r e a r s a n d l i s t e n u p . S oc i a li s m d o e s n o t w o r k a n d w e

i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s o f A m e r i ca d o n o t w a n t i t . G E T IT ! A R E Y O U

L I S T E N I N G ! I o n l y h o p e t h a t i t w i l l n o t b e t o o l a t e t o c le a n u p

t h i s h o r r i fi c m e s s w h e n a n e w a d m i n i s t r a t io n i s u s h e r e d in

# 54
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895896http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895853http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895851http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895838http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895831http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895828http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-895821


13/15

You must be logged i n to post a comment.

National secur i ty f l ip-f lop: Obama toretreat on KSM/Gitmo detaineecivilian trials fo r now March 4, 2010 11:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

9 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

The Chicago Way: Judgeships forDemcare votes?

March 3, 2010 11:24 PM by Michelle Malkin


No coincidences.

National securi ty s tone w al l : Fox te l ls you what Holder w on t March 3, 2010 04:57 PM by Michelle Malkin


More pressure on the Holder/DOJstone wal l : Who are the al Qaeda 7?

March 2, 2010 02:27 PM by Michelle Malkin


Green Room The White FlagPresidency

Green Room

Doing it Chicago style:Obama gives away

judgeships for votes

Rieh l Wor ld View Pentagon Shooter:Truther And UCSF /Berkeley Lib?

Mudvi l l e Gaze t t e The Born Insanity

Rieh l Wor ld View Update: But, How? KSMTo Be Tried By Military Tribunal?

Hot Ai r WaPo: WH to overruleHolder, send 9/11 plottersto military commissions

Reds ta te Will Delahunt (D, MA-10) cuts and runs.

Hot Ai r Change: MassachusettsDem Delahunt to retire

2 0 1 2 .

On February 25th, 2010 at 10:31 pm, R e p u b l i c a n v e t said:

Michelle, being a member of the media, you should send a FOIA to the DOJ

demanding documentation of any jihadi defending hack.

Use the Cloward-Piven strategy. Pass the FOIA around to all conservative

media and let everyone submit the same FOIA.

If Holder wants to keep it secret, then he can either defend his decision to

ignore the FOIA publicly, or in court if he just ignores the request.

Either way it s a win-win.

# 55

Holder himself said in a press release trumpeting new freedom of information rules last year. Put up or shut up, Mr. Attorney General.
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/#http://www.facebook.com/pages/Michelle-Malkin/269123710083http://twitter.com/MichelleMalkinhttp://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/04/change-massachusetts-dem-delahunt-to-retire/http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/03/04/will-delahunt-d-ma-cuts-and-runs/http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/05/wapo-wh-to-overrule-holder-send-911-plotters-to-military-commissions/http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2010/03/but-how-ksm-to-be-tried-by-military-tribunal.htmlhttp://www.mudvillegazette.com/033406.htmlhttp://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2010/03/pentagon-shooter-truther-and-ucsf-berkeley-lib.htmlhttp://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/03/04/doing-it-chicago-style-obama-gives-away-judgeships-for-votes/http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/03/04/the-white-flag-presidency/mailto:[email protected]://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/02/more-pressure-on-the-holderdoj-stone-wall-who-are-the-al-qaeda-7/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/02/more-pressure-on-the-holderdoj-stone-wall-who-are-the-al-qaeda-7/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/02/more-pressure-on-the-holderdoj-stone-wall-who-are-the-al-qaeda-7/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/03/national-security-stone-wall-fox-tells-you-what-holder-wont/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/03/national-security-stone-wall-fox-tells-you-what-holder-wont/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/03/national-security-stone-wall-fox-tells-you-what-holder-wont/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/03/the-chicago-way-judgeships-for-demcare-votes/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/03/the-chicago-way-judgeships-for-demcare-votes/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/03/the-chicago-way-judgeships-for-demcare-votes/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/03/the-chicago-way-judgeships-for-demcare-votes/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/04/national-security-flip-flop-obama-to-retreat-on-ksmgitmo-detainee-civilian-trials-for-now/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/04/national-security-flip-flop-obama-to-retreat-on-ksmgitmo-detainee-civilian-trials-for-now/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/04/national-security-flip-flop-obama-to-retreat-on-ksmgitmo-detainee-civilian-trials-for-now/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/04/national-security-flip-flop-obama-to-retreat-on-ksmgitmo-detainee-civilian-trials-for-now/http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-login.php?redirect_to=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellemalkin.com%2F2010%2F02%2F24%2Fcorruptocrat-eric-holder%25e2%2580%2599s-national-security-cover-up%2F%3Floggedin%3D1267794630%23commentformhttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/24/corruptocrat-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-national-security-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-896914


14/15

The la tes t on the Holder/DOJ nat ionalsecuri ty cover-up March 1, 2010 12:20 PM by Michelle Malkin42 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Pelosi on Ran gel: Big deal, i t s not l ikehe endangered n at ional securi ty orany th ing

March 1, 2010 10:05 AM by Michelle Malkin


Breaking down corr uptocrat AG EricHolder s s tonewall February 26, 2010 12:57 PM by MichelleMalkin

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/26/breaking-down-corruptocrat-ag-eric-holders-stonewall/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/26/breaking-down-corruptocrat-ag-eric-holders-stonewall/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/26/breaking-down-corruptocrat-ag-eric-holders-stonewall/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/26/breaking-down-corruptocrat-ag-eric-holders-stonewall/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/pelosi-on-rangel-big-deal-its-not-like-he-endangered-national-security-or-anything/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/pelosi-on-rangel-big-deal-its-not-like-he-endangered-national-security-or-anything/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/pelosi-on-rangel-big-deal-its-not-like-he-endangered-national-security-or-anything/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/pelosi-on-rangel-big-deal-its-not-like-he-endangered-national-security-or-anything/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/the-latest-on-the-holderdoj-national-security-cover-up/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/the-latest-on-the-holderdoj-national-security-cover-up/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/the-latest-on-the-holderdoj-national-security-cover-up/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/01/the-latest-on-the-holderdoj-national-security-cover-up/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/02/more-pressure-on-the-holderdoj-stone-wall-who-are-the-al-qaeda-7/


15/15

Categories: Corruption , Eric Holder , Gitmo

Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

GOP beats back sneak at tack on CIA interrogators

February 25, 2010 1 0:07 PM by MichelleMalkin

55 Commen ts | 5 Trackbacks

Culture of corru pt ion watch: Rangel broke ethics ru l es , 4 other CBC

members exone rated

February 25, 2010 07:52 PM by MichelleMalkin

29 Comme nt s | 9 Trac kb acks

About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Powered by WordPressDesign by The BlogStudio

Maintenance by Mark Jaquith, Ed Burns & Erik Tamplin 2004-2010 Michelle Malkin LLC all rights reserved
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/http://michellemalkin.com/contact/http://michellemalkin.com/archives/http://feeds.feedburner.com/michellemalkin/postshttp://feeds.feedburner.com/michellemalkin/postshttp://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MichelleMalkin/http://www.flickr.com/photos/39049221@N00/http://erikt.com/http://blogrescue.com/http://coveredwebservices.com/http://theblogstudio.com/http://wordpress.org/http://www.flickr.com/photos/39049221@N00/http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MichelleMalkin/http://feeds.feedburner.com/michellemalkin/postshttp://michellemalkin.com/archives/http://michellemalkin.com/contact/http://michellemalkin.com/about/http://michellemalkin.com/category/war/gitmo/http://michellemalkin.com/category/politics/eric-holder/http://michellemalkin.com/category/politics/corruption/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/culture-of-corruption-watch-rangel-broke-ethics-rules-4-other-cbc-members-exonerated/http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/gop-beats-back-sneak-attack-on-cia-interrogators/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/gop-beats-back-sneak-attack-on-cia-interrogators/#commentshttp://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/25/gop-beats-back-sneak-attack-on-cia-interrogators/

corruptocrat eric holder’s national security cover-up

Documents