cosmic adventure 5.5 relativistic length contraction
TRANSCRIPT
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
A Length and a Spatial Coordinate Separation
First we need to distinguish between a “length” and a “spatial coordinate separation”. A “length” is the measurement of the dimension or coordinate difference of a solid body like a rod or a ruler. A “spatial coordinate separation” is the measurement of some empty space. In our discussion, we concentrate on length.
0’
𝑥′
0’’
𝑥′′
0’
𝑥′
0’’
𝑥′′
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Above: Metric system Below: Imperial system
Length Representation –The Ruler
A ruler is the best material to represent a length on a one dimensional scale.
There are many types of rulers. The one we are going to use is the universal one. It has no units. So it can be of any scale or length.
Normal Ruler
Universal Ruler
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Transformation of a Length
One of the well-known magic of the relativists is the ability to squeeze a long rod or ruler into a shorter one. It is called ‘length contraction’. It happens only in the direction parallel to the direction in which the observed body is travelling.
T r a n s f o r m ! ! !
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Rest Length or Proper Length
The length of a rod or ruler can be determined by direct measurement when it is at rest with respect to an observer. The resultant length of the ruler at rest is called the ‘rest length’ or ‘proper length’ of the body.
proper length 𝐿0
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Length in Classical Physics
In classical physics, in addition to direct measurement, another way to determine the length of the ruler is by calculating the difference between the spatial coordinates of the endpoints of the ruler.
Here 𝐿0 = 𝑥′′ − 𝑥′.
0’
𝑥′
0’’
𝑥′′𝐿0
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Coordinates of the Ends
According to the Theory of Special Relativity, the coordinates of the ends in relativity are formed by Lorentz transformation:
𝑥′ =𝑥′′ + 𝑣𝑡
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
𝑥′′ =𝑥′ + 𝑣𝑡
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
0’
𝑥′
0’’
𝑥′′𝐿0
𝑥′′ + 𝑣𝑡′′
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
𝑥′ + 𝑣𝑡′
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Length in Relativity
Thus the length is:
𝐿0 = 𝑥′′ − 𝑥′
=𝑥′′ + 𝑣𝑡′′
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
−𝑥′ + 𝑣𝑡′
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
=𝑥′′ − 𝑥′ + 𝑣 𝑡′′ − 𝑡′
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
0’
𝑥′
0’’
𝑥′′𝐿0
𝑥′′ − 𝑥′ + 𝑣 𝑡′′ − 𝑡′
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Measured by Different Viewer
𝑥′′ − 𝑥′ = 𝐿0Is the proper length of the ruler as measured by 𝑂′.
𝑡′′ − 𝑡′ will be zero if 𝑥′′
and 𝑥′ are measured by O at the same time.
Then 𝑥′′ − 𝑥′ will be the length 𝐿 of the ruler measured by O.
𝐿0 = 𝑥′′ − 𝑥′
𝑥′′ − 𝑥′ + 𝑣 𝑡′′ − 𝑡′
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
𝑡′′ − 𝑡′ = 0
𝐿 = 𝑥′′ − 𝑥′
Measured by O
Measured by O’
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Lorentz contraction
With 𝐿0 as the proper length and 𝐿 as the measured length, the relationship between the two measurements is:
𝐿 = 𝐿0 1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
L = changed length
𝐿0 = 𝑂𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ
𝑣 = 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦
𝑐 = 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Lorentz contraction
Since 1 −𝑣2
𝑐2is smaller
than 1, 𝐿 is greater than 𝐿0.
This means that there is a phenomenon of length contraction.
Historically, it is called the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction or simply:
Lorentz contractionHendrik Lorentz (1853-1928)
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Velocity as a fraction of the speed of light
𝐿 = 𝐿𝑜 1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Leng
th C
ontr
acti
on
Graph of Length Contraction
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
This effect is negligible at everyday speeds, and can be ignored for all regular purposes. Only at greater speeds does it become dominant.
Velocity as a fraction of the speed of light
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Leng
th C
ontr
acti
on
𝐿 = 𝐿𝑜
𝐿 = 0
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Example 1
Example 1: At a speed of 15,000 km/s or 0.05c,contracted length is 86.6% of the length at rest;
𝐿 = 𝐿𝑜 1 −15,000
2
30,0002
= 0.866 𝐿𝑜
𝑣 = 0.0 𝑐
𝑣 = 0.4 𝑐
𝑣 = 0.6 𝑐
𝑣 = 0.7 𝑐
𝑣 = 0.99 𝑐
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Example 2
At a speed of 29,500 km/s or 0.983c, contracted length is 1% of the length at rest;
𝐿 = 𝐿𝑜 1 −29.5002
30,0002
= 0.01 𝐿𝑜
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Is Length Contraction Real?
But is this contraction real?
Some say yes and some say no. Even the great scientists could not make up their minds.
In 1911, the Serbian physicist Vladimir Varićak (1865-1942) had to assert that length contraction is "real" according to Lorentz, while it is "apparent or subjective" according to Einstein.
Wikipedia.
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Einstein was not that certain either, he replied:
. . . The question as to whether length contraction really exists or not is misleading. It doesn't "really" exist, in so far as it doesn't exist for a comoving observer; though it "really" exists, i.e. in such a way that it could be demonstrated in principle by physical means by a non-comoving observer.
— Albert Einstein, 1911 - Wikipedia
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Proper length 𝐿 0
Contracted length 𝐿
The phenomenon of Length contraction is Allegedly Real
The body of the ruler or any length will be shortened due to the transformation of the equations. The higher the velocity, the more shortening there will be. Relativists maintain that this effect is physical and real.
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Cannot be Definitely Explained
Length contraction cannot be explained in a clean way by common sense because the theory is based on the assumptions of the Michelson-Morley experiment which to us is still controversial. However, because the theory of Special Relativity had many apparent achievement in other aspects, the argument keeps on being hot until these days.