cosmic magnetic fields: helicity injection by supermassive black holes, galaxies and laboratory...
TRANSCRIPT
Cosmic Magnetic Fields: Helicity Injection bySupermassive Black Holes, Galaxies and
Laboratory Experiments
Hui Li 李暉Los Alamos National Laboratory
and a member of Center for Magnetic Self-Organization
Collaborators:
M. Nakamura, S. Li, S. Colgate, J. Finn, K. Fowler
Overview of astrophysical observations of cosmic magnetic fields Global Electro-Magnetic model for astrophysical jets Synergy between astrophysics and laboratory plasma physics
Optical X-ray “sound ripples”
radio galaxy
Fabian et al.
Perseus Cluster
Perseus A
Black Hole Accretion Disk
Hydra A
(Taylor & Perley’93; Colgate & Li’00)
70 kpc
EnergyandFlux
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.Black hole mass3.6 million solar
Masses(Genzel et al.)
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Our own backyardGalactic Center
Ubiquity of Supermassive Black Holes
(Kormendy et al. 2001)
Cosmic Energy Flow
Gravity
Stars, galaxies, galaxy clusters,
large scale shocks, etc.
IGM
“Feedback”MechanicalChemicalThermal
Non-ThermalMagnetic
collapse
Cosmic Energy Flow
Gravity
Stars, galaxies, galaxy clusters,
large scale shocks, etc.
IGM
“Feedback”MechanicalChemicalThermal
Non-ThermalMagnetic
collapse
Black Holes
RadiationKinetic WindsMagnetic fields
108 Msun 1062 ergs
High z sources
GiantsCluster sources
(Kronberg, Dufton, Li, Colgate’02)
Magnetic Energy of Radio Lobes
Modeling Jets/Lobes
1014
(solar system)
SCALES
1019 (10pc)
1022-23
(10 kpc)1024
(300 kpc)1025 cm(~3 Mpc)
Black holeDisk aroundblack hole
Host galaxy
Radio lobesMix with IGM?
Kinetically Dominated vs. Magnetically Dominated
e.g., Norman et al., Clark et al. in 80’s
Jones & Ryu et al., Ferrari et al. in 90’s
Many, many, others
Kinetic Energy Dominated Regime:
v2 >> B2
Problem Set-up
radius
R-3/2
Static Limit(vinj << vexpan)
Steps:a. Arcade on disk, (r,z);b. Specify twist profile, ();c. Bounded by pressure, p();d. Find sequences of equilibrium, with increasing toroidal flux,
energy, and helicity; Black Hole
Accretion Disk
€
J × B = ∇p
Δ*ψ + d(H 2 /2) /dψ + 4πr2 dP /dψ = 0
p(ψ) = pc 1−ψ
ψmax
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
2 ⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ ⎥
(Li et al. 2001)
Helix Expansion (Li et al. 2001)
• Force-free fields expand 600 away from the axis;
• Radial expansion of outer fields are prevented by the plasma pressure.
Squeezing Flux Tubes(Parker)
Twist Re-distribution --- Collimation
Added twists are concentrated around the axis resulting in collimation.
Radius
q = rBz/B
B
Bz
Br
“RFP in the sky?”
)( / :ratioFlux
/ :Helicity
/ :Energy
1/
max2
max22
H
W
z
B
>>∝∝
∝
μλμλμλ
φ
disk
Viewing it as a magnetic system…..Key Model Ingredients
Poloidal flux: (r,z) Electric field and voltage:
(-vBz) dl = V(r,z) Injection duration: tinj
Poloidal current: unspecified Iz(r,z) Mag. energy injection rate: dEmag/dt = Iz V - Ploss
Losses: radiation, pdV, heating, kinetic flows, CRs, etc. Expansion: Iz(r,t), (r,t), and Ploss(r,t).
BH
Li et al. (2006)
€
∫
Laboratory Plasma Experiments (Bellan et al.)
Qu
ickTim
e™
an
d a
TIF
F (L
ZW
) decom
pre
ssor
are
nee
de
d to
see th
is p
ictu
re.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
“Gun” Parameter
€
λ =I pol
Ψpol
r0
Gcm2) I ~ 1019-20 Amperes r0 ~ 1015 cm (disk)
λ ~ 0.1-10
Gcm2) I ~ 105 Amperes r0 ~ 10 cm (gun)
λ ~ 0.1-1
Supermassive Black Hole: Caltech’s Experiment:
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Ipol
r
€
magnetic field injection :
Ψinj = r2 exp(−r2 − k2z2 )
Bφ inj = αΨinj / r,
∂B
∂t= Binj(r, z)• γ(t)
Li et al. (2006)
compresses the inner fluxes along the equatorial plane. “squeezes” the flux vertically out. expands the outer fluxes outwards. no azimuthal rotation.
Consequences:
“Ideal” MHD Simulations
€
∂∂t
+∇ • ρv( ) = ˙ ρ inj
∂(ρv)
∂t+∇ • ρvv+ Pg +
B2
2− BB
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥= −ρ∇Φ
∂E
∂t+∇ • E + Pg +
B2
2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟v− v• B( )B
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥= −ρv• ∇Φ + ˙ E inj
E =1
2ρv2 +
Pg
γ −1+
B2
2
∂B
∂t=∇× v× B( ) + ˙ B inj ,
S. Li & H. Li (2003, 2006)
“Ideal” 3D MHD Simulations
Spherical isothermal background in density
and pressure
T=8 keV, c = 3x10-3 cm-3,
rc=150 kpc;
Injection: 3x107 yrs, 3x1059 ergs
320x320x320 simulation
(700 kpc)3
Mass injection: ~ 5 Msun/yr within central 35
kpc
€
=0
1+(r / rc )2[ ]
β
log(density)
Nakamura, Li & Li (2006)
Poloidal Jz
Hydro-shock
Tangentialdiscontinuity
Slow-wave
“flux core: & Iz”(“helix/jet”)
toroidal B from Iz (“lobes”)
confinement(B2
/8 ~ pgas)
Jz @ t = 10
Lobes: Pressure Confinement and Nearly Force-Free
€
−∂p
∂r−
∂
∂r
Bφ2 + Bz
2
2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟−
Bφ2
r− ρ
∂Φ
∂r≈ 0
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.Evolution
Time
Toroidal Flux
Poloidal Fluxz=0
Poloidal Fluxz=6
Poloidal Current Iz
log(density)
Nakamura, Li & Li (2006)
Poloidal Jz
Stability: with initial perturbations
Nakamura, Li & Li (2006)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Kink Unstable (m=1 mode)
€
VA = 8 − 9, Lkink = 2 − 4, τ A−1 = 2.0 − 4.5
→ Im(ω) =d f (m,k)
2
dt≈ O τ A
−1( ) Nakamura & Li (2006)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Jz = 1.5 Jz = -0.5 Combined
KH Stable
Perseus A426
M87
Summary on Jet/Lobe Modeling
Lobes are magnetically dominated and are confined by the surrounding pressure.
Lobes form via background density/pressure changes, accompanied by flux conversion.
Helix is kink-unstable, though the overall structure is not completely destroyed.
Lobes are far from relaxation.
Why Plasma Astrophysics?Common physical processes:
dynamo (magnetic field generation) and flux-conversion dynamo ideal and resistive MHD stabilities magnetic reconnection flow generation angular momentum transport particle acceleration
Common numerical tools: ideal and resistive MHD codes PIC gyrokinetic, hybrid, etc.
Laboratory Magnetized Plasma Astrophysics
QuickTime™ and aDV/DVCPRO - NTSC decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
You et al. 2005Hsu & Bellan’03
Laboratory Plasma Experiments for Understanding the Formation and Collimation of Jets
Lebedev et al. 2005
IndividualGalaxy
GalaxyClusters
Super-Galactic Filaments
The MagnetizedUniverse (?)
Kronberg et al’03
Farady Rotation Measure
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Thank you!