cost management in an automated business environment (abc, and tqm) chapter 6
TRANSCRIPT
Cost Management in an Automated Business Environment (ABC, and TQM)
Chapter 6
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-2
The Development of a Single Company-Wide Cost Driver
Traditional cost systems were created whenmanufacturing processes were labour intensive.
Traditional cost systems were created whenmanufacturing processes were labour intensive.
A single company-wide overhead rate,based on direct labour hours, is used
to allocate overhead to products inthese labour intensive processes.
A single company-wide overhead rate,based on direct labour hours, is used
to allocate overhead to products inthese labour intensive processes.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-3
The Development of a Single Company-Wide Cost Driver
Overhead is allocated to jobs using directlabour hours. If overhead is $120, how much
overhead is allocated to each job?
Overhead is allocated to jobs using directlabour hours. If overhead is $120, how much
overhead is allocated to each job?
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-4
The Development of a Single Company-Wide Cost Driver
Overhead Rate = $120 ÷ 8 direct labour hoursOverhead Rate = $15 per direct labour hour
Job 1 = 2 hours × $15 per hour = $30Job 2 = 6 hours × $15 per hour = $90
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-5
The Development of a Single Company-Wide Cost DriverLabour Intensive Process
Overhead costs are relatively small.
Overhead allocations may be inaccurate,but the amounts are relatively insignificant.
Automated Process
Overhead costs are relatively large.
Inaccurate overhead allocation can lead to questionable product cost information.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-6
The Effects of Automation on the Selection of a Cost Driver
Automation increasesoverhead from $120 to $420
and reduces the Job 2 labourhours from 6 to 1. Allocate
the $420 overhead to the two jobs using direct labour.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-7
The Effects of Automation on the Selection of a Cost Driver
Overhead Rate = $420 ÷ 3 direct labour hoursOverhead Rate = $140 per direct labour hour
Job 1 = 2 hours × $140 per hour = $280Job 2 = 1 hour × $140 per hour = $140
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-8
Is this reasonable?
Automation benefited Job 2, but Job 1 isallocated more overhead. Clearly, we needanother cost driver to allocate overhead.
The Effects of Automation on the Selection of a Cost Driver
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-9
Using Activity-Based Cost Drivers
Level of C
omplexity
Level of C
omplexity
Overhead Allocation
Company-wide Overhead
Rate
Activity BasedCosting
Many companies are using activity- based cost drivers to improve product
costing.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-10
Using Activity-Based Cost Drivers
Carver makes vegetableand tomato soup.
Vegetable Tomato Total
Number of Cans 954,000 234,000 1,188,000
Number of Batches 180 180 360
Number of Setups 180 180 360
Cost per setup 264$ 264$ 528$
Total overhead = 360 setups × $264 per setup = 95,040$
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-11
Using Activity-Based Cost DriversAllocating Setup Costs Using aVolume-based Allocation Rate
Overhead per can = $95,040 ÷ 1,188,000 cansOverhead per can = $0.08 per can
Vegetable = 954,000 cans × $0.08 per can = $76,320Tomato = 234,000 cans × $0.08 per can = $18,720
Vegetable Tomato Total
Number of Cans 954,000 234,000 1,188,000
Number of Batches 180 180 360
Number of Setups 180 180 360
Cost per setup 264$ 264$ 528$
Total overhead = 360 setups × $264 per setup = 95,040$
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-12
Using Activity-Based Cost DriversAllocating Setup Costs Using aVolume-based Allocation Rate
The volume-based allocation rate overcosts the high-volume product and
under costs the low-volume product.
Vegetable Tomato Total
Number of Cans 954,000 234,000 1,188,000
Number of Batches 180 180 360
Number of Setups 180 180 360
Cost per setup 264$ 264$ 528$
Total overhead = 360 setups × $264 per setup = 95,040$
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-13
Using Activity-Based Cost DriversAllocating Setup Costs Using anActivity-based Allocation Rate
Overhead per batch = $264
Vegetable = 180 batches × $264 per batch Vegetable = $47,250Tomato = 180 batches × $264 per batch = $47,250
Vegetable Tomato Total
Number of Cans 954,000 234,000 1,188,000
Number of Batches 180 180 360
Number of Setups 180 180 360
Cost per setup 264$ 264$ 528$
Total overhead = 360 setups × $264 per setup = 95,040$
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-14
Activity-based Cost Drivers Enhance Relevance
Activity-based cost drivers allocaterelevant costs ($264 batch set-up)
to appropriate products.
Cost Driver Vegetable Tomato
Volume-based 76,320$ 18,720$
Activity-based 47,250 47,250
Allocation to Product
$47,250 is the cost avoided if Carver ceases production of either product,
or if the set-up function is outsourced.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-15
Activity-Based Costing
A
B C
Activity-based costing (ABC) is a two-stage allocationprocess that employs a variety of cost drivers.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-16
Activity-Based Costing
Activity-based costing (ABC) is a two-stage allocationprocess that employs a variety of cost drivers.
Stage 1Assign costs to pools
according to activities that cause costs to be incurred.
Stage 2Allocate costs in the
activity pools to products.
The first step is toidentify essential
activities and costsrequired to perform
the activities.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-17
Traditional Two-Stage Cost Allocation
Department 1
Product 1
Department 2
Product 2
Overhead Costs
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-18
Activity-Based Cost Allocation
Overhead Costs
ActivityCenter 1
Product 1 Product 2
ActivityCenter 3
ActivityCenter 2
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-19
Types of Production Activities
Overhead costs associatedwith each category are pooled togetherand allocated to products according to
how those products benefit fromthe activities.
Unit-LevelActivity
Batch-Level Activity
Product-LevelActivity
Facility-LevelActivity
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-20
Let’s look at anexample from theUnterman Shirt
Company.
Types of Production Activities
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-21
Types of Production Activities
Total
Expected Volume 680,000 120,000 800,000 Total Overhead 5,730,000$
Sales Price 31.00$ 31.00$ Overhead Rate 7.16$ 7.16$ Direct Material 8.20 8.20 Direct Labour 6.80 22.16 6.80 22.16 Gross Margin 8.84$ 8.84$
Dress Shirts Casual Shirts
Product Lines
Unterman Shirt Company
Overhead Rate = $5,730,000 ÷ 800,000 shirts = $7.16 per shirt (Rounded)
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-22
Types of Production Activities
Unterman decides to implement ABC andcategorizes activities into four activity cost centers.
Unit-levelActivities
Batch-levelActivities
Product-levelActivities
Facility-levelActivities
Incurred each timea shirt is made.
Incurred each time a batch ofshirts(casual or dress)is made.
Supports either dressor casual shirts.
Benefit the entire process,not a line of specific shirts.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-23
Unit-level Activity Center
Unterman identifies the following unit-leveloverhead costs ($1,296,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Unterman identifies the following unit-leveloverhead costs ($1,296,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-24
Unit-level Activity Center
Unterman uses direct labour hours toallocate the unit-level overhead costs.
Unterman uses direct labour hours toallocate the unit-level overhead costs.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-25
Batch-level Activity Center
Unterman identifies $690,000 in batch-leveloverhead costs ($690,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Unterman identifies $690,000 in batch-leveloverhead costs ($690,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Unterman uses number of setups toallocate the batch-level overhead costs.
Unterman uses number of setups toallocate the batch-level overhead costs.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-26
Product-level Activity Center
Unterman identifies $1,800,000 in product-leveloverhead costs ($1,800,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Unterman identifies $1,800,000 in product-leveloverhead costs ($1,800,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Unterman allocates 70% product-level coststo casual shirts and 30% to dress shirts.
Unterman allocates 70% product-level coststo casual shirts and 30% to dress shirts.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-27
Facility-level Activity Center
Unterman identifies $1,944,000 in facility-leveloverhead costs ($1,944,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Unterman identifies $1,944,000 in facility-leveloverhead costs ($1,944,000 of the total $5,730,000):
Unterman allocates 85% facility-level coststo dress shirts and 15% to casual shirts.
Unterman allocates 85% facility-level coststo dress shirts and 15% to casual shirts.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-28
Using the Information
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-29
Using the Information
Traditional costing resulted in undercosting the casual shirt line and overcosting the dress shirt line.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-30
Using the Information
Should Untermanincrease the priceof casual shirts?
Should Untermanreduce the priceof dress shirts?
Should Untermandrop the
casual shirt line?
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-31
Using the Information
Target pricing might be useful.
Determine the price customers will pay for casualshirts, and then reduce costs so that they maybe produced and sold profitably at that price.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-32
Using the Information
Unterman must determine if costs are avoidablebefore dropping the casual shirt line.
Facility-level overhead costs are usually unavoidable.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-33
We should consider othercosts such as sales commissions
and research and developmentcosts before making any of
these decisions.
Using the Information
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-34
Total Quality Management
Let’s change gears andlook at another topic.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-35
Total Quality Management
Quality
Design Conformance
Quality refers to the degree to which actual productsand services conform to their design specification.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-36
Costs companies incur to assure quality conformance may be classified as: Prevention costs. Appraisal costs. Internal failure costs. External failure costs.
Total Quality Management
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-37
Prevention costs-incurred to avoid non conforming products Inspection of materials upon delivery Inspection of production processEquipment inspectionEmployee training
Total Quality Management
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-38
Appraisal costs-incurred to identify nonconforming products that were not avoided via the prevention cost expenditures.Finished goods inspectionField testing of products
Total Quality Management
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-39
Internal failure costs – defects discovered before delivery to customers.Scrap materialsReworkReinspection of reworkLost sales resulting
from late deliveries Cost
Report
Total Quality Management
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-40
External failure costs – defects discovered after delivery to customers.Warranty repairsProduct liabilityMarketing costs to
improve product imageLost sales due to poor
product quality
Total Quality Management
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-41
Minimizing Total Quality Costs
Cost of prevention
and appraisal
Cost ofinternal and
external failure
Objective: Minimize defects while alsominimizing all four quality cost categories.
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-42
Minimizing Total Quality Costs
Total Quality cost
Percent of Products without Defects
Cos
t pe
r U
nit
($)
Internal andexternal
failure costs
Prevention and appraisal costs
0 100
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-43
Unterman CompanyQuality Cost Report
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002Amount Percentage
Prevention Costs 106,000$ 13.87% Appraisal Costs 150,000 19.63% Internal Failure Costs 298,000 39.01% External Failure Costs 210,000 27.49% Total Quality Costs 764,000$ 100.00%
Quality Cost Reports
Should Unterman spend more on preventionand appraisal in an effort to reduce failure costs?
Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada6-44
End of Chapter 6
I’m managingquality time!