costs and impacts from leaking wrecks: response costs and removal costs

15
Costs and Impacts from Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Response Costs and Removal Costs Removal Costs Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting Wrecks of the World (WOW) II: Evaluating and Addressing Potential Underwater Threats Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies (MITAGS) Linthicum, Maryland 6 – 7 June 2011

Upload: abbot-compton

Post on 03-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs. Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting. Wrecks of the World (WOW) II: Evaluating and Addressing Potential Underwater Threats - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Costs and Impacts fromCosts and Impacts fromLeaking Wrecks:Leaking Wrecks:

Response Costs and Response Costs and Removal CostsRemoval Costs

Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhDEnvironmental Research Consulting

Wrecks of the World (WOW) II:Evaluating and Addressing Potential Underwater ThreatsMaritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies

(MITAGS) Linthicum, Maryland6 – 7 June 2011

Page 2: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Response CostsResponse Costs

Assuming wreck is leaking or likely to leak…

Spill cleanup response/monitoring operations(and environmental/socioeconomic damages)

OROil removal operations

Page 3: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Example: SS Jacob LuckenbachExample: SS Jacob LuckenbachFreighter sank 14 July 1953 after collision with another vessel off California coast. Wreck contained 1,360 tonnes of heavy fuel oil.

Wreck leaked oil periodically, primarily during large winter storms when currents rocked vessel.

Page 4: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Damages from SS Jacob LuckenbachDamages from SS Jacob Luckenbach•Dozens of spills over 10 years with millions of dollars in cleanup costs

•51,000 birds, sea otters oiled (> 50 species)

•>10,000 sq km ocean impacted

•US$2 million/year on wildlife rehabilitation

•US$20 million for wreck oil removal operations to prevent further oiling damage

Page 5: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Components of Averted Response CostsComponents of Averted Response Costsand Damagesand Damages

• Monitoring of leaking or potentially leaking wreck• Response and cleanup costs for leakage events– Shoreline cleanup– Oversight– Disposal

• Response and cleanup for potential large releases– On-water response (mechanical, dispersant)– Oversight– Shoreline cleanup– Disposal

Page 6: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Factors Affecting Potential Response CostsFactors Affecting Potential Response Costs• Location

– Physical geography (shoreline type, water depth, sea state)– Political regime (response regulations – funding, dispersant policy )– Cultural/social regime (public involvement, “how clean is clean”, labor costs)– Proximity and nature of sensitive resources (habitats, shorelines) to protect– Proximity and type of response resources available

• Response type– Response strategy employed + timing (equipment, personnel requirements)– Effectiveness of on-water response (mechanical, dispersant)– Endpoints in shoreline cleanup (“how clean is clean”)

• Oil- and hazmat (HNS)-type– Persistence– Toxicity– Human health impacts, chemical reactions/releases

• Volume and nature of release– Smaller volumes more expensive on per-unit basis unless very small– Continuous vs. sudden, massive release– Oil spread, degree of shoreline impact

Page 7: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

State-of-the-Art Cost AnalysesState-of-the-Art Cost Analyses

•Trajectory, fate, effects modeling of hypothetical scenarios•Data for simulating behavior of oil•Data for estimating costs/impacts•Planning for spill response contingencies and preparedness

•Cost models based on algorithms from data on previous spills•Adapted to specific scenarios•Local information

PREVAILING CO NDIT IO NS

SELECTW ATER

TEM PERATURE

5ºC

CONDITIONSRESPONSECRITERIA

SELECT W ATER-BASEDSOCIOECONOM IC

RESOURCES

ON-W ATER OILING CONDITIONS

SELECT SURFACEWATER TYPE

SM ALL LAKE

LARGE RIV ER

SM ALL STREAM

OPEN M ARINE

OPEN FRESH

OPEN ESTUARY

WATERRESPONSECRITERIA

SHORELINE CONDITIONS

SHORELINERESPONSECRITERIA

SHORELINEOILING

CRITERIA

SELECT O ILT YPE

SELECT SHORELINE(ESI) TYPE

SHO RELINE-BASEDSO CIO ECO NO M IC

IM PACT S

SHO RELINE-BASED

NAT URALRESO URCE

IM PACT S

SELECT"HOW CLEAN IS CLEAN"

ESTIM ATED SHORELINE RESPONSEEF FECTIVENESS

SELECTSHO RELINE-

BASED NATURALRESOURCES

SHORELINERESPONSE

IM PACT

SOCIOECONOMICRESOURCE

IMPACTS

SPECIFYSPILL AMOUNT

% R EM OVAL

SHORELINE RESPONSE COST

ON-W AT ERRESPONSE

COST

TOTALRESPONSE

COST

NATURALRESOURCEDAMAGES

(COSTS)

SOCIO-ECONOMICDAMAGES

(COSTS)

SELECTPREVAILING

W INDS

CALM - L IGHT 2 k ts

M ODERATE 15 k ts

STRONG 25 k ts

GALE 35 k ts

FRESH

RAINBOW SHEEN

SILV ER SHEEN

M OUSSE

FILM

SELECT SLICKTHICKNESS

CONTINUOUS

BROKEN

PATCHY

SPORADIC

SELECT SLICKCOV ERAGE

SELECT SHORELINEOIL COV ERAGE

CONTINUOUS

BROKEN

PATCHY

SPORADIC

FRESH OIL

M OUSSE

TARBALLS

PATTIES

TAR STRANDS

SELECT SHORELINESURFACE OILING

SURFACERESIDUE

ASPHALTPAV EM ENT

POOLED >1 cm

COV ER >0.1-1 cm

COAT <0.1 cm

STAIN

FILM

SELECT SHORELINEOIL THICKNESS

SELECT SHORELINERESPONSE M ETHOD

NATURAL RECOV ERY

M ANUAL

M ECHANICAL

SORBENTS

SEDIM ENT REWORK

V EGETATIONREM OV AL

BURN

FLOODING

LOW PRESSURECOLD WASH

HIGH PRESSURECOLD WASH

LOW PRESSURE HOTWASH

HIGH PRESSURE HOTWASH

STEAM CLEAN

SAND BLAST

CLEANING AGENTS

BIOREM EDIATION

SPECIFYRESPONSE

TIM ING

HOURS

NONE

M ECHANICAL

BURN

DISPERSANT

s q. m e te rs

SPECIFY SHORELINEAREA IM PACTED

s q. m e te rs

PREDICTEDSHORELINE

AREAIM PACTED

OR

[O IL DAMAGES W ITHOUT RESPONSE] -

[O IL DAMAGES W ITH RESPONSE + RESPONSEDAMAGES]

= BENEFIT OF RESPONSE

COMPARE RESPONSE COST:BENEFIT OF RESPONSE

T OT ALDAMAGES

OR

ESTIM ATEDON-WATERRESPONSE

EFFECTIV ENESS

% REM OV AL

SPECIFIEDO N-WAT ERRESPO NSE

EFFECT IVENESS

% REM OV AL FISHERIES

PORTS

BOATING REC FISHING

WATER INTAKE

DRINK WATER

OTHER HIGH LOW USE

SELECT W ATER-BASEDNATURAL RESOURCES

FISH

M AM M ALS

OTHER HIGH LOW

BIRDS

CORAL REEF

BIRDS

M AM M ALS

ENDANGEREDSPECIES

M ODERATESENSITIV E

LOWSENSITIV E

HIGHLYSENSITIV E

SELECT SHORELINE-BASEDSO CIOECONO M IC RESO URCES

TOURIST BEACH

SPECIFYRESPONSE

EFFECTIVENESS

% REM OV AL

9: SHELTEREDTIDAL FLAT

10A: SALT/BRACK M ARSH

10B: FRESH-WATER M ARSH

10C: SWAM P

10D: M ANGROV E

7: EXPOSED TIDALFLAT

6A: GRAV ELBEACH

6B: RIPRAPSTRUCTURES

8B: SHELTEREDSOLID M ANM ADE

8A: SHELTEREDROCKY SHORE

1A: EXPOSEDROCKY

2: ROCKYPLATFORM

3: FINE SAND

4: COARSE SAND

5: M IXEDSAND/GRAV EL

RESIDENTIAL

WILDLIFE V IEWING HIGH V ALUE

INDUSTRIAL M EDIUM V ALUE

PORT LOW V ALUE

OIL SPILL RESPONSE COSTEFFECTIVENESS ANALYTICAL

TOOL (OSRCEAT)

OIL DAM AGES W ITHRESPO NSE

RESPO NSE BENEFIT

O IL DAM AG ES WIT HO UT RESPO NSE

O IL DAM AG ES M IT IG AT ED

RESPO NSEDAM AG E

OIL DAM AGES W ITHRESPO NSE

M AXIM UM HIGH

M EDIUM

M INIM UMLOW

<3 M ILES

3-10 M ILES

10-50 M ILES

50+ M ILES

SELECTPREV AILING

WIND DIRECTION

T O SHOR E

OFFSHOR E

NEARSHORE

10ºC

20ºC

30ºC

GASO LINE

JET F UEL

DIESEL

LT CRUDE

LUBE O IL

M ED CRUDE

HVY CRUDE

#6 FUEL

IFO

SELECTDISTANCE TO

SHORE

W ATER-BASEDSOCIOECONOMIC

IMPACTS

W ATER-BASEDNATURAL

RESOURCE IMPACTS

NATURALRESOURCE

IMPACTS

SELECTON-WATERRESPONSEM ETHOD

Page 8: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

7

EPA BASIC OIL SPILL COSTESTIMATION MODEL

SELECT OIL TY PE

SELECT LOCAT IONM EDIUM T YPE

TOXICITY

DEGRADATION

SPREAD

PENETRATION

PERSISTENCE

SOCIOECO NO M IC/CULT URALCOST M O DIFIER

FRESHWAT ERVULNERABILIT YCOST M O DIFIER

OIL T O XICIT Y

OIL PERSIST ENCE

OIL TY PECOST

FACTORS

SPILL SIZE-CO STRELAT IO NSHIP OIL AMOUNT

SPILL SIZEFACTOR

SPECIFYSPILL AM O UNT

HABIT AT /WILDLIFECOST M O DIFIER

T OT AL EST IM AT EDENVIRO NM ENT AL

DAM AG E COST

T OT AL EST IM AT EDSOCIOECO NO M IC

DAM AG E COST

T OT AL EST IM AT EDRESPONSE COST

1 2

4

3

5

6

OT HER SENSIT IVE

AGRICULT URAL

DRY GRASSLAND

T AIGA

LAKE/PO ND

URBAN/INDUST RIAL

WET LAND

ROADSIDE/SUBURB

FOREST

T UNDRA

PER-GALLO NBASE

RESPONSE COST

PER-GALLO NBASE

SOCIOECO NO M ICCOST

PER-GALLO NBASE

ENVIRO NM ENT ALDAM AG E COST

SELECT LOCATIONSOCIOECONOM IC +CULTURAL V ALUE

HIGH

VERY HIGH

EXT REM E

M INIM AL

M ODERAT E

NONE

OIL T O XICIT Y

OIL PERSIST ENCE

GRASSLAND

FOREST

TAIGATUNDRA

W ETLAND

MUDFLAT

OPEN WATER/ SHORE

SOIL/SAND

PAVEMENT/ROCK

TAR

LTC

WTO

WAX

HVC

UNOIFO

HVO

NEV

M IN

LUB

EDO

CRD

LTO

LTF

VOD

ANF

OTR

SELECT FRESHWAT ERVULNERABILIT Y

RECREAT IO N

DRINKING

NON-SPECIFIC

WILDLIFE USE

T RIBUT ARIES

INDUST RIAL

SPECIF IC GRAVITY

M ECHANICAL INJURY (SPECIFIC G RAVIT Y)

EST UARYRIVER/ST REAM

SELECT LOCAT IONHABIT AT + WILDLIFE

SENSIT IV IT Y

OIL PERSIST ENCE

Per-gallon o il spill costs areinversely related to spill s ize.Regression form ula used to

estim ate per-gallon cost.

O il type im pacts all costcategories. O il behaviorvaries by m edium type.

Potential im pact dependson toxic ity , m echanical

in jury potentia l, andpersistence. O il type

character and behaviorintegrated into o il type

cost factors.

M edium (substrate) typeinfluences degree of o ilpenetration and spread.Penetration and spreadare m odified for o il typecost factor derivation.

Socioeconom ic and cultural value of spilllocation im pact socioeconom ic costs. Costs

are d irectly correlated w ith value society putson spill location. Cost m odifier is adjusted

based on value rating given.

O il persistence andtoxicity have im pact

on d ifferentwater-use types.

Freshwater vulnerability accounted for inenvironm ental dam age. Drinking water, recreation, and

wild life use g iven h igher ratings for h igher im pact.

Habitat/w ild life andwater vulnerability

com bine todeterm ine

environm entaldam age.

Ecosystem (habitat andassociated w ild life)

vulnerability rated toadjust habitat/w ild life

m odifier.

Per-gallon base response-,socioeconom ic-, and

environm ental dam agecosts determ ined based on

variable inputs.

Per-gallon costs m ultip lied by spill am ount togive total costs that can be added together or

used separately .

SPECIFYRESPO NSE

M ET HOD

2A

M ECHANICAL

DISPERSANT

IN SIT U BURN

Responsem ethod canhave greatim pact on

response cost,and

socioeconom ic,and

environm entaldam ages.

Page 9: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

PREVAILING CO NDIT IO NS

SELECTW ATER

TEM P ERATURE

5ºC

CONDITIONSRESPONSECRITERIA

SELECT W ATER-BAS EDSOCIOECONOM IC

RES OURCES

ON-W ATER OILING CONDITIONS

SELECT SURFACEWATER TYPE

SM ALL LAKE

LARGE RIV ER

SM ALL STREAM

OPEN M ARINE

OPEN FRESH

OPEN ESTUARY

WATERRESPONSECRITERIA

SHORELINE CONDITIONS

SHORELINERES PONSECRITERIA

SHORELINEOILING

CRITERIA

SELECT O ILT YPE

SELECT SHORELINE(ESI) TYPE

SHO RELINE-BASEDSO CIO ECO NO M IC

IM PACT S

SHO RELINE-BASED

NAT URALRESO URCE

IM PACT S

SELECT"HOW CLEAN IS CLEAN"

ESTIM ATED SHORELINE RESPONSEEF FECTIVENESS

SELECTSHO RELINE-

BASED NATURALRESOURCES

SHORELINERESPONSE

IM PACT

SOCIOECONOMICRESOURCE

IMPACTS

SPECIFYSPILL AMOUNT

% R EM OVAL

SHORELINE RESPONSE COST

ON-W AT ERRESPONSE

COST

TOTALRESPONSE

COST

NATURALRESOURCEDAMAGES

(COSTS)

SOCIO-ECONOMICDAMAGES

(COSTS)

SELECTPREVAILING

W INDS

CALM - L IGHT 2 k ts

M ODERATE 15 k ts

STRONG 25 k ts

GALE 35 k ts

FRESH

RAINBOW SHEEN

SILV ER SHEEN

M OUSSE

FILM

SELECT SLICKTHICKNESS

CONTINUOUS

BROKEN

PATCHY

SPORADIC

SELECT SLICKCOV ERAGE

SELECT SHORELINEOIL COV ERAGE

CONTINUOUS

BROKEN

PATCHY

SPORADIC

FRESH OIL

M OUSSE

TARBALLS

PATTIES

TAR STRANDS

SELECT SHORELINESURFACE OILING

SURFACERESIDUE

ASPHALTPAV EM ENT

POOLED >1 cm

COV ER >0.1-1 cm

COAT <0.1 cm

STAIN

FILM

SELECT SHORELINEOIL THICKNESS

SELECT SHORELINERESPONSE M ETHOD

NATURAL RECOV ERY

M ANUAL

M ECHANICAL

SORBENTS

SEDIM ENT REWORK

V EGETATIONREM OV AL

BURN

FLOODING

LOW PRESSURECOLD WASH

HIGH PRESSURECOLD WASH

LOW PRESSURE HOTWASH

HIGH PRESSURE HOTWASH

STEAM CLEAN

SAND BLAST

CLEANING AGENTS

BIOREM EDIATION

SPECIFYRESPONSE

TIM ING

HOURS

NONE

M ECHANICAL

BURN

DISPERSANT

s q. m e te rs

SPECIFY SHORELINEAREA IM PACTED

s q. m e te rs

PREDICTEDSHORELINE

AREAIM PACTED

OR

[O IL DAMAGES W ITHOUT RESPONSE] -

[OIL DAMAGES W ITH RESPONSE + RESPONSEDAMAGES]

= BENEFIT OF RESPONSE

COMPARE RESPONSE COST:BENEFIT OF RESPONSE

T OT ALDAMAGES

OR

ESTIM ATEDON-WATERRESPONSE

EFFECTIV ENESS

% REM OV AL

SPECIFIEDO N-WAT ERRESPO NSE

EFFECT IVENESS

% REM OV AL FISHERIES

PORTS

BOATING REC FISHING

WATER INTAKE

DRINK WATER

OTHER HIGH LOW USE

SELECT W ATER-BAS EDNATURAL RESOURCES

FISH

M AM M ALS

OTHER HIGH LOW

BIRDS

CORAL REEF

BIRDS

M AM M ALS

ENDANGEREDSPECIES

M ODERATESENSITIV E

LOWSENSITIV E

HIGHLYSENSITIV E

SELECT SHORELINE-BASEDSO CIOECONO M IC RESO URCES

TOURIST BEACH

SPECIFYRESPONSE

EFFECTIVENESS

% REM OV AL

9: SHELTEREDTIDAL FLAT

10A: SALT/BRACK M ARSH

10B: FRESH-WATER M ARSH

10C: SWAM P

10D: M ANGROV E

7: EXPOSED TIDALFLAT

6A: GRAV ELBEACH

6B: RIPRAPSTRUCTURES

8B: SHELTEREDSOLID M ANM ADE

8A: SHELTEREDROCKY SHORE

1A: EXPOSEDROCKY

2: ROCKYPLATFORM

3: FINE SAND

4: COARSE SAND

5: M IXEDSAND/GRAV EL

RESIDENTIAL

WILDLIFE V IEWING HIGH V ALUE

INDUSTRIAL M EDIUM V ALUE

PORT LOW V ALUE

OIL SPILL RESPONSE COSTEFFECTIVENESS ANALYTICAL

TOOL (OSRCEAT)

OIL DAM AGES W ITHRESPO NSE

RESPO NSE BENEFIT

O IL DAM AG ES WIT HO UT RESPO NSE

O IL DAM AG ES M IT IG AT ED

RESPO NSEDAM AG E

OIL DAM AGES W ITHRESPO NSE

M AXIM UM HIGH

M EDIUM

M INIM UMLOW

<3 M ILES

3-10 M ILES

10-50 M ILES

50+ M ILES

SELECTPREV AILING

WIND DIRECTION

T O SHOR E

OFFSHOR E

NEARSHORE

10ºC

20ºC

30ºC

GASO LINE

JET F UEL

DIESEL

LT CRUDE

LUBE O IL

M ED CRUDE

HVY CRUDE

#6 FUEL

IFO

SELECTDISTANCE TO

SHORE

W ATER-BASEDSOCIOECONOMIC

IMPACTS

W ATER-BASEDNATURAL

RESOURCE IMPACTS

NATURALRESOURCE

IMPACTS

SELECTON-WATERRESPONSEM ETHOD

Page 10: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Environmental and Socioeconomic Resources at RiskEnvironmental and Socioeconomic Resources at Risk

Page 11: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Calculating Benefit of Wreck Oil RemovalCalculating Benefit of Wreck Oil Removal• Determine hypothetical spill/release scenario(s)

– Nature of event(s)• Continuous chronic or episodic releases• Large release

– Oil/hazardous material type(s) and amount(s)

• Model trajectory, fate, and effects of release scenarios

• Estimate impacts and costs of release scenarios– Response and cleanup costs – Environmental damages– Socioeconomic damages (e.g., fisheries, tourism)

Page 12: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Costs of Wreck Oil Removal OperationsCosts of Wreck Oil Removal Operations

• Spill response preparedness• Spill response, if needed (prepared, timely, on site)• Salvage equipment and personnel• Monitoring equipment and personnel• Logistical support

Page 13: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Factors Affecting Wreck Oil Removal CostsFactors Affecting Wreck Oil Removal Costs• Location

– Water depth– Currents and sea state– Weather– Logistical support

• Vessel characteristics– Oil- and hazmat (HNS)-type and content (munitions, human remains)– Vessel type and construction/configuration– Degree of corrosion– Vessel orientation (upright, on side)– Vessel condition (broken, split, intact)– Other factors (presence of munitions, human remains, cultural artifacts)

• Equipment required and availability• Monitoring and oversight logistics required and availability

Page 14: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Costs of Wreck Oil RemovalCosts of Wreck Oil Removal

Operation Complexity

Cost FactorsCost RangeDepth

(meters)Oil

Viscosity Waters Mobilization Wreck Condition

Simple <20 Low Protected Local Good <$1 – 5M

Moderate 20 – 50 MediumWeather and sea

restrictedRegional Moderate $2 – 7M

Complex 50 – 250 High Open Distant Poor $5 – 20+M

Highly Complex >250 High Open Distant Poor $20 – 100+M

Page 15: Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs

Basic Cost-Benefit AnalysisBasic Cost-Benefit Analysis

Value of averted costs and damages= BenefitBenefit of oil removal

If benefit > cost of oil removal operation,Then, oil removal operation has a NET BENEFIT

to environment and to society