coteaching reflection tool part i

Upload: claudio-melo-vergara

Post on 02-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I

    1/6

    Co-Teaching Reflection Tool

    PURPOSE: This tool is designed to assist co-teaching teams by facilitating reflection upon

    their co-teaching implementation in order to enhance or refine existing practices.

    Directions-Part 1In each of the category areas, each teacher should individually check the rating ofinitiating,developing or sustaining that best describes their co-teaching teams current status ofcollaborative implementation of co-teaching approaches. The categories included are planning,instructional environment, physical environment, discipline and school environment.

    Initiating: Two teachers have been assigned to the same classroom and have begun to develop aco-teaching partnership and establish responsibilities to be shared.

    Developing: Co-Teachers are sharing many responsibilities, modifying their thinking andimplementing evidence-based co-teaching practices in an observable way.

    Sustaining: Co-Teachers consistently share responsibilities and collaboratively implementevidence-based co-teaching practices through seamless planning, delivery and assessment of

    instruction.

    1This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].

  • 7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I

    2/6

    Co-Teaching Reflection Tool

    Initiating Developing Sustaining

    Planning

    forInstructionandAssessment

    One teacher addresses theplanning and adaptations

    necessary for students specificneeds including Universal Designfor Learning

    One teacher plans for instruction,assessment, behavior and

    integration of technology

    Both teachers equally share in thelesson development appropriate

    to the approach of co-teachingutilized

    One teacher plans content delivery One teacher adapts plans forstudents with disabilities instruction,assessment and behavior usingUniversal Design for Learning

    Identification/alignment to anduse of State Curriculum (SC)and/or Core Learning Goals (CLG)

    Each teacher understands theoutcome of the lesson andseparately monitors studentprogress

    Teachers plan to jointly deliver thelesson

    Incorporation of modifications,accommodations, UniversalDesign for Learning anddifferentiation to address diverse

    learning needs Special education teacher plans for

    IEP implementation One teacher monitors student

    progress and adjusts instructionaccordingly

    Planning for implementation ofinstruction and assessmentaligned to the SC andindividualized goals to beaddressed for all students

    Selection of appropriateinstructional and assessmentdelivery, based on studentsneeds and content, including theintegration of technology

    Incorporation of classroommanagement procedures

    Teachers maintain separategradebooks

    Teachers begin to develop aconsistent grading policy

    Both teachers monitor studentprogress and adjust instructionaccordingly

    Both teachers agree upon aconsistent policy for grading andhomework

    2This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].

  • 7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I

    3/6

    Co-Teaching Reflection Tool

    Initiating Developing Sustaining

    InstructionalEnviro

    nment

    Students are learning and engagedby only one teacher

    Students learn and engage morewith one teacher than another

    All students learn and engagewith both teachers

    Special educator only providesassistance to the studentsidentified with disabilities andcollects and analyzes data inisolation

    One teacher leads instruction whilethe other teacher only interjects,circulates and provides studentsupport as needed

    Teachers share equal status ininstruction, assessment andclassroom management, includingdata collection and analysis

    One teachers name is included onall written materials

    One teacher primarilycommunicates with students,parents, other teachers andadministrators, regardinginstruction, assessment andclassroom management

    Teachers share responsibilitiessuch as: communicating withstudents, parents, other teachers,and administrators, regardinginstruction, assessment andclassroom management

    One teachers name is noted on themajority of information withoccasional inclusion of the otherteachers name when it relates tospecific students

    Both teachers names are listedon items such as the door,rosters, report cards, and writtencommunication to parents

    Special educator developsassessments for studentsidentified with disabilities andprovides grades to the general

    educator.

    One teacher develops assessmentsand collects and analyzes data

    One teacher implements agreedupon policy for grading andhomework

    Teachers share responsibility forintegrating technology intoinstructional delivery andassessment

    Both teachers utilize a consistentpolicy for grading and homework

    3This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].

  • 7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I

    4/6

    Co-Teaching Reflection Tool

    Initiating Developing Sustaining

    PhysicalEnvironm

    ent

    Resources and materials areviewed as property of one teacher

    or the other

    Access to all materials in the workenvironment may be limited

    Both teachers have shared accessto all resources and materials

    One teacher has no assigned areain the learning environment

    Work space is shared but issomewhat limited

    Both teachers have appropriateand reasonable work space in thelearning environment

    No flexibility in use of space forco-teaching approaches and theencouragement of studentmovement for interactions

    Space restricts selection ofco-teaching approaches andappropriate student movement forinteractions

    Space allows for grouping andstudent movement forinteractions in theimplementation of the various co-teaching approaches

    4This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].

  • 7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I

    5/6

    Co-Teaching Reflection Tool

    Initiating Developing Sustaining

    Discipline

    One teacher is responsible forestablishing and communicating

    expectations

    Some shared responsibility forestablishing and communicating

    expectations

    Both teachers share responsibilityfor establishing and

    communicating expectations forall students

    Each teacher disciplines aspecified group of students

    The majority of discipline is handledby one teacher

    Both teachers ensure all studentsadhere to classroom expectations

    One teacher is solely responsiblefor implementing BehaviorIntervention Plans

    One teacher has primaryresponsibility to implement BehaviorIntervention Plans

    Both teachers share responsibilityto implement BehaviorIntervention Plans

    Students respond to one teacheronly in regard to instruction anddiscipline

    Teachers independently decideupon behavior practices to usewithin the classroom

    Students respond primarily to oneteacher in regard to instruction anddiscipline

    Teachers use some of the behaviorpractices within an existing school-wide approach

    Students respond to bothteachers equally in regard toinstruction and discipline

    Teachers use behavior practicesconsistent with any existingschool-wide approach(es)

    5This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].

  • 7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I

    6/6

    Co-Teaching Reflection Tool

    Initiating Developing Sustaining

    SchoolEnvironment

    Minimal or no time for jobembedded co-planning and co-

    teaching

    The schedule provides limited timefor job embedded co-planning and

    co-teaching

    The schedule provides time forjob-embedded co-planning and

    co-teaching

    Few resources are providedincluding: scheduling, space,appropriate student grouping,instructional materials, andtechnology

    Limited resources are providedincluding: scheduling, space,appropriate student grouping,instructional materials andtechnology

    Needed resources are providedincluding: scheduling, space,appropriate student grouping,instructional materials andtechnology

    Teachers work in isolation toaddress barriers or problems

    The environment provides somesupport for collaboration andproblem-solving by staff

    The environment supportscollaboration and problem-solvingby staff

    The school community does not

    embrace collaboration and co-teaching as an integral part ofinstruction and assessment

    Some members of the school

    community embrace collaborationand co-teaching as an integral partof instruction and assessment

    The school culture embraces

    collaboration and co-teaching asan integral part of instruction andassessment

    Minimal or no professionaldevelopment, including job-embedded professionaldevelopment specific to co-teaching is provided

    Feedback provided to co-teachersreflects limited or no

    understanding of the co-teachingframework and focuses more onone teacher than another

    Limited professional developmentspecific to co-teaching including job-embedded professionaldevelopment is provided

    Some feedback is provided tosupport enhancement of co-

    teaching and collaborative practiceswhich reflects partial understandingof the co-teaching framework, butmay focus more on one teacherthan another

    High quality professionaldevelopment specific to co-teaching is provided based uponteacher and student needsincluding job-embeddedprofessional development

    Feedback and coaching isprovided to support enhancement

    of co-teaching and collaborativepractices as reflected in theco-teaching framework

    6This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].