coteaching reflection tool part i
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I
1/6
Co-Teaching Reflection Tool
PURPOSE: This tool is designed to assist co-teaching teams by facilitating reflection upon
their co-teaching implementation in order to enhance or refine existing practices.
Directions-Part 1In each of the category areas, each teacher should individually check the rating ofinitiating,developing or sustaining that best describes their co-teaching teams current status ofcollaborative implementation of co-teaching approaches. The categories included are planning,instructional environment, physical environment, discipline and school environment.
Initiating: Two teachers have been assigned to the same classroom and have begun to develop aco-teaching partnership and establish responsibilities to be shared.
Developing: Co-Teachers are sharing many responsibilities, modifying their thinking andimplementing evidence-based co-teaching practices in an observable way.
Sustaining: Co-Teachers consistently share responsibilities and collaboratively implementevidence-based co-teaching practices through seamless planning, delivery and assessment of
instruction.
1This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].
-
7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I
2/6
Co-Teaching Reflection Tool
Initiating Developing Sustaining
Planning
forInstructionandAssessment
One teacher addresses theplanning and adaptations
necessary for students specificneeds including Universal Designfor Learning
One teacher plans for instruction,assessment, behavior and
integration of technology
Both teachers equally share in thelesson development appropriate
to the approach of co-teachingutilized
One teacher plans content delivery One teacher adapts plans forstudents with disabilities instruction,assessment and behavior usingUniversal Design for Learning
Identification/alignment to anduse of State Curriculum (SC)and/or Core Learning Goals (CLG)
Each teacher understands theoutcome of the lesson andseparately monitors studentprogress
Teachers plan to jointly deliver thelesson
Incorporation of modifications,accommodations, UniversalDesign for Learning anddifferentiation to address diverse
learning needs Special education teacher plans for
IEP implementation One teacher monitors student
progress and adjusts instructionaccordingly
Planning for implementation ofinstruction and assessmentaligned to the SC andindividualized goals to beaddressed for all students
Selection of appropriateinstructional and assessmentdelivery, based on studentsneeds and content, including theintegration of technology
Incorporation of classroommanagement procedures
Teachers maintain separategradebooks
Teachers begin to develop aconsistent grading policy
Both teachers monitor studentprogress and adjust instructionaccordingly
Both teachers agree upon aconsistent policy for grading andhomework
2This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].
-
7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I
3/6
Co-Teaching Reflection Tool
Initiating Developing Sustaining
InstructionalEnviro
nment
Students are learning and engagedby only one teacher
Students learn and engage morewith one teacher than another
All students learn and engagewith both teachers
Special educator only providesassistance to the studentsidentified with disabilities andcollects and analyzes data inisolation
One teacher leads instruction whilethe other teacher only interjects,circulates and provides studentsupport as needed
Teachers share equal status ininstruction, assessment andclassroom management, includingdata collection and analysis
One teachers name is included onall written materials
One teacher primarilycommunicates with students,parents, other teachers andadministrators, regardinginstruction, assessment andclassroom management
Teachers share responsibilitiessuch as: communicating withstudents, parents, other teachers,and administrators, regardinginstruction, assessment andclassroom management
One teachers name is noted on themajority of information withoccasional inclusion of the otherteachers name when it relates tospecific students
Both teachers names are listedon items such as the door,rosters, report cards, and writtencommunication to parents
Special educator developsassessments for studentsidentified with disabilities andprovides grades to the general
educator.
One teacher develops assessmentsand collects and analyzes data
One teacher implements agreedupon policy for grading andhomework
Teachers share responsibility forintegrating technology intoinstructional delivery andassessment
Both teachers utilize a consistentpolicy for grading and homework
3This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].
-
7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I
4/6
Co-Teaching Reflection Tool
Initiating Developing Sustaining
PhysicalEnvironm
ent
Resources and materials areviewed as property of one teacher
or the other
Access to all materials in the workenvironment may be limited
Both teachers have shared accessto all resources and materials
One teacher has no assigned areain the learning environment
Work space is shared but issomewhat limited
Both teachers have appropriateand reasonable work space in thelearning environment
No flexibility in use of space forco-teaching approaches and theencouragement of studentmovement for interactions
Space restricts selection ofco-teaching approaches andappropriate student movement forinteractions
Space allows for grouping andstudent movement forinteractions in theimplementation of the various co-teaching approaches
4This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].
-
7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I
5/6
Co-Teaching Reflection Tool
Initiating Developing Sustaining
Discipline
One teacher is responsible forestablishing and communicating
expectations
Some shared responsibility forestablishing and communicating
expectations
Both teachers share responsibilityfor establishing and
communicating expectations forall students
Each teacher disciplines aspecified group of students
The majority of discipline is handledby one teacher
Both teachers ensure all studentsadhere to classroom expectations
One teacher is solely responsiblefor implementing BehaviorIntervention Plans
One teacher has primaryresponsibility to implement BehaviorIntervention Plans
Both teachers share responsibilityto implement BehaviorIntervention Plans
Students respond to one teacheronly in regard to instruction anddiscipline
Teachers independently decideupon behavior practices to usewithin the classroom
Students respond primarily to oneteacher in regard to instruction anddiscipline
Teachers use some of the behaviorpractices within an existing school-wide approach
Students respond to bothteachers equally in regard toinstruction and discipline
Teachers use behavior practicesconsistent with any existingschool-wide approach(es)
5This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].
-
7/27/2019 CoTeaching Reflection Tool Part I
6/6
Co-Teaching Reflection Tool
Initiating Developing Sustaining
SchoolEnvironment
Minimal or no time for jobembedded co-planning and co-
teaching
The schedule provides limited timefor job embedded co-planning and
co-teaching
The schedule provides time forjob-embedded co-planning and
co-teaching
Few resources are providedincluding: scheduling, space,appropriate student grouping,instructional materials, andtechnology
Limited resources are providedincluding: scheduling, space,appropriate student grouping,instructional materials andtechnology
Needed resources are providedincluding: scheduling, space,appropriate student grouping,instructional materials andtechnology
Teachers work in isolation toaddress barriers or problems
The environment provides somesupport for collaboration andproblem-solving by staff
The environment supportscollaboration and problem-solvingby staff
The school community does not
embrace collaboration and co-teaching as an integral part ofinstruction and assessment
Some members of the school
community embrace collaborationand co-teaching as an integral partof instruction and assessment
The school culture embraces
collaboration and co-teaching asan integral part of instruction andassessment
Minimal or no professionaldevelopment, including job-embedded professionaldevelopment specific to co-teaching is provided
Feedback provided to co-teachersreflects limited or no
understanding of the co-teachingframework and focuses more onone teacher than another
Limited professional developmentspecific to co-teaching including job-embedded professionaldevelopment is provided
Some feedback is provided tosupport enhancement of co-
teaching and collaborative practiceswhich reflects partial understandingof the co-teaching framework, butmay focus more on one teacherthan another
High quality professionaldevelopment specific to co-teaching is provided based uponteacher and student needsincluding job-embeddedprofessional development
Feedback and coaching isprovided to support enhancement
of co-teaching and collaborativepractices as reflected in theco-teaching framework
6This document was developed and produced by the Maryland State Department of Education, Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services (June2011) with funds from the [U.S. Department of Education, Grant # H323A07000-09].