cotr diagnostics and sources of microbunching › events_folder › ubi12 › ubi12-talks ›...
TRANSCRIPT
COTR Diagnostics and Sources of Microbunching
Alex Lumpkin, Fermilab Presented at Microbunching Instability Workshop
College Park, MD April 13, 2012
OUTLINE
I. Introduction II. Diagnostics with optical transition radiation (OTR) - Characterization of microbunching using Coherent OTR (COTR) III. Early microbunching interplay in a FEL IV. Mitigation options of COTR in imaging V. LCLS X-ray FEL effects VI. Summary
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 2
Microbunching Mechanisms
• Microbunching of an electron beam, or a z-dependent density modulation with a period λ, can be generated by several mechanisms: – The LSC-induced microbunching (LSCIM) starts from noise
fluctuations in the charge distribution which causes an energy modulation that converts to density modulation following Chicane compression. This is a broadband case. (our topic).
– The laser-induced microbunching (LIM) occurs at the laser resonant wavelength (and harmonics) as the e-beam co-propagates through the wiggler with the laser beam followed by Chicane compression. This is narrow-band. (Oct. 2011 WS)
– In self-amplified spontaneous emission or (SASE) induced microbunching (SIM) the electron beam is also bunched at resonant wavelength and harmonics. This is narrow band.
• A microbunched beam will radiate coherently.(COTR) A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 3
4
Coherent Optical Transition Radiation
Calculations Coherent Spectral-Angular Distribution from a Macropulse, • Number of Photons per Unit Frequency and Solid Angle
E = 220 MeV σx’, y’ = 0.2 mrad
Single Particle OTR Spectral-Angular Distribution
From D. Rule and A. Lumpkin, PAC’01
( ) ( )kk ℑΩ
=Ω ⊥ I
ddNdr
ddNd
ωω1
22//,
2
( )( )2222
22
2
21
2 1
yx
yx
ce
ddNd
θθγ
θθωπω ++
+=
Ω −
Angle (radians)-0.010 -0.005 0.000 0.005 0.010
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity (a
rb. u
nits
)0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012
5
COTRI Calculations (cont.)
Coherence Function ( ) ( ) ( ) 21 kk HNNN BB −+=ℑ
Fourier Transform of Charge Form Factors
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )zzyyxx kFkgkgQ
H ==kk ρ
Q = total charge of macropulse
Bunching fraction = fB=NB/N Note: The coherence function reduces to just the number of particles, N , when the number of microbunched particles, NB is zero.
From D. Rule and A. Lumpkin, PAC’01
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012
6
Schematic of APS SASE FEL Experiment
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012
*FEL decommissioned 2004
Sta-5
300-A VLD1 Data
• OTR/COTR data from a) LSCIM and b) LSCIM plus SIM. Peaks about 5x brighter in b). (Dec. 2001)
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 7
X (ch)
Y(ch
)
800 µm 800 µm
ND 1.0 500 nm SPF
X (ch) Y
(ch)
(a) (b)
Lumpkin, Dejus, Sereno: PRST-AB April 2009
300-A VLD2 Data
• OTR/COTR data from a) LSCIM and b) SIM. The right hand peak in b) is 100 times brighter. FEL at 530 nm.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 8
500-nm SPF ND 2.0
(a)
(b)
Inte
nsity
X (ch)
Inte
nsity
X (ch)
320 µm (FWHM)
800 µm
(a)
Lumpkin,Dejus,Sereno: PRST-AB April 2009
Spectra in SASE and COTR Observed At and After Saturation
• Spectral evolution shown after undulators 5,7,9.
9 A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012
Experimental Gain Curves Compared to GENESIS Results
• Experimental Gain curves for COTR (L) and UR (R) compared to GENESIS (Y. Chae). Data of 12-20-01.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 10
Z Position (VLD #)0 2 4 6 8 10
OTR
Imag
e In
tens
ity (1
05 c
ts)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
300-A COTR DS6 GEN Norm. @ VLD1 GEN-260A-Norm.@VLD1
Z Position (VLD #)0 2 4 6 8 10
UR
Imag
e In
tens
ity (1
05 c
ts)
1e+0
1e+1
1e+2
1e+3
1e+4
1e+5
1e+6
1e+7
300-A UR HM-DS5 GEN-II-Norm.@VLD1GEN-260A-N1-@VLD1
Lumpkin,Dejus,Sereno: PRST-AB April 2009
Schematic of the APS Injector Area
• Both rf PC gun and rf TC gun beams available for acceleration, compression, and diagnosis.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 11
L5
150 MeV
Sta-5 200-500 MeV
FS3 FS4 FS5
(Decom-missioned)
Enhanced OTR Images Seen
• Examples of images and profiles for L2 phase at 12 deg. (L-uncompr.) and L2 phase at 14.9 deg.(R-compr.)
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 12
X
X
X X
Y Y
Inte
nsity
Inte
nsity
Mitigation Techniques
• Diagnostics COTR mitigation options include: – Spectral differences between OTR and COTR can be used to
sort photons. (APS/ANL) – Scintillators can be used to enhance S/B ratio in combination
with a bandpass filter. (APS/ANL) – Temporal gating can sort prompt COTR and delayed scintillator
light, both MCP gate and CCD shutter options. (DESY, ANL, and FNAL examples.)
– Angular distributions of COTR and IOTR are displaced in some cases. Proposed at µBI-08 by R. Fiorito.
– Specific COTR angles can be spatially filtered versus 4π scintillator light. (DESY and SACLA)
• Instability suppression by laser beam heating, reversible beam heating, noise suppression,dispersion, drive laser shorter pulse. A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 13
OTR vs. COTR
Wavelength (nm)0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16OTR Rel. Intensity Model CCD response (x10)COTR or OTR gained up (3 keV)
LCLS COTR Case: BC1
• Estimate OTR spectral effect in LCLS OTR12 case.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 14
OTR COTR* (3 keV)
CCD Resp. (x10)
-UV-
*3-keV curve based on Ratner et al., FEL08
COTR Mitigation Test at 325 MeV
• Reduction of COTR effects with 400x40 nm BPF, but need more sensitive camera than 40dB analog CCD to see remaining OTR.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 15
Y
X(ch)
Y
X(ch)
I I
LSCIM COTR:ND0.5 COTR:400x40 nm LSO: 400x40 nm
X(ch)
Y
I
Spectral Tests on COTR
• ICCD with GaAs PC data; Conditions such that un-filtered COTR needed ND2 to avoid saturation of ICCD.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 16
LSO:Ce,400x40nm, ND1.0 OTR,450x40 nm, ND0.0
Spectrometer results (10-30-08)
• Grating offset adjusted to probe the red/NIR end of the COTR spectra using ICCD readout with GaAs PC.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 17
X(ch
)
Wavelength(ch)
650 nm
900 nm
1250 nm offset, 10 µm Slit, ND1.0, ICCD
880 nm
880 nm In
tens
ity
880 nm
ITT web site
Converter Options
• Reconsider possible scintillators based on Ce doping of yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG), lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO), and yttrium aluminum perovskite (YAP).
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 18
Converter Spectrum (FWHM)*, Peak
Efficiency Response Time (FWHM)
Comment
YAG:Ce 487-587, 526 nm
1.0* 89 ns* 460 µm T
LS0:Ce 380-450, 415 nm
0.46* 40 ns* 530 µm T
YAP:Ce 350-400, 369 nm
~0.5 28 ns 460 µm T
OTR Broadband 0.0013* ~10 fs Surface
*Berg,Lumpkin,Yang: Linac 2000
Spectral Modulation Effect Seen
• Increased L2 gradient and achieved more COTR with compression. (Dec. 14, 2008.)
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 19
X
posi
tion
550 nm
a)
26 nm
X Po
sitio
n
26 nm b)
600 750 900 600 750 900 Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm)
Spectral Intensity Modulation
• Table I: Summary of observations on the COTR spectral modulation with the two gratings (12-08).
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 20
Grating Lines/mm
Wavelength (nm)
Peak Sep. (nm)
Mod. Freq. (THz)
Mod. Period (µm)
95 600 17 14.1 21 95 650 19 13.5 22 95 700 23 14.1 21 95 750 26 13.9 22 95 800 31 14.5 21 135 550 25 24.8 12 135 600 30 25.0 12 135 650 31 22.0 14 135 700 36 21.8 14
dν = -c dλ/λ2
ANL MCP Gate Results
• Recent ANL tests with MCP-CCD (See J. Dooling Talk)
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 21
FLASH : Gated ICCD on COTR
• MCP gate used to reject prompt COTR emissions
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 22
M.Yan,GSI WS 2011
FNAL Digital CCD Shutter Option
• The present digital CCDs provide a time shutter option at the 10-µs level at the video readout rate. For single pulse or pulses at or less than video rate (1-30 Hz) this could be used to reject the prompt COTR.
• A proof-of-principle test on 10-µs shutter was done with OTR and LYSO:Ce at FNAL photoinjector in 2011. Full rejection ratio not known yet. >50
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 23
A.S. Johnson et al. IPAC12
LYSO:Ce
OTR
Temporal Profile Measurement at SACLA under COTR
FEL'11@Shanghai 24 20 fs resolution
< 10 μm resolution 5712 MHz HEM11
4th Microbunching Instability WS, Univ. of Maryland April 11-13, 2012
Courtesy of the SACLA Team 24 A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012
Profile Measurement using Spatial Mask and Fluorescence Screen
4th Microbunching Instability WS, Univ. of Maryland April 11-13, 2012
Courtesy of the SACLA Team
Deflector ON
Deflector Off
X-ray FEL Impact of µB Instability
• Laser heater simulations performed for FIR modulations.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 26
Laser heater-LCLS (135 MeV)
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 27
Emma,Huang: uBI-II
Microbunching Instability at LCLS
Laser Heater Off
SXR Spectrometer Dump YAG Screen
e- energy
28 A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012
J. Welch et al., FEL10
Microbunching Instability at LCLS
Laser Heater ON – No Instability
29 A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012
J. Welch et al., FEL10
e- energy
Laser-induced energy modulation used to suppress uBI at LCLS in x-ray FEL, but COTR interferences still exist.
SUMMARY
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 30
• Interplay of the microbunching mechanisms is possible. – LSCIM can lead to prebunching an FEL at resonance condition. – Studies of COTR strength after chicane: possible 2-D spatial
imaging, 2-D angular distributions, x,y-spectral imaging, longitudinal imaging.
– At some point LSCIM or laser heater might interfere with LIM. – Energy modulation due to LSCIM can be measured directly.
• Benchmark codes on microbunching fractions. • Mitigation techniques for diagnostics have been
demonstrated for moderate to extensive COTR. • Intrinsic suppression of µBI by laser beam heating,
reversible beam heating, and dispersive elements. • Future tests planned at ASTA/Fermilab; need modeling.
Acknowledgements
• Many discussions with D. Dowell, Z. Huang, H. Loos of SLAC and W. Fawley (LBNL), D. Rule (NSWC), and R. Fiorito (UMD).
• Support from K.-J. Kim, R. Gerig, and H. Weerts of the Argonne Accelerator Institute.
• The collaborations on ANL linac tests of N. Sereno, J. Dooling, S. Pasky, Y. Li of ANL.
• The support of M. Wendt of Fermilab. • Two PRST-AB articles available: April and August 2009. Earlier reports in BIW08, FEL08, Linac08, µBunching II.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 31
APS Spectral Filtering on LSO:Ce
• 400x10 nm BPF used to suppress COTR spikes on 500-µm thick LSO:Ce crystal scintillations into CCD camera.
A.H. Lumpkin uBI4 Workshop April 13, 2012 32
COTR Spikes
COTR Spikes
X Position (ch) X Position (ch)
Inte
nsity
Inte
nsity
40-MeV Injector for ASTA/FNAL
A.H. Lumpkin BIW12 April 17, 2012 33
• Injector being installed with First beam expected in 2012.
electron gun
booster cavities
3rd harmonic
cavity
flat beam transform
chicane
deflecting mode cavity
beam dump
1st cryomodule
test beamlines beam
dump
spectrometer magnet
40-MeV Injector
Booster cavity 2 (from DESY and Saclay) installed in NML
First cryomodule (from DESY) installed at NML. Courtesy of M. Church
Prototype Imaging Station
• New developed imaging station in collaboration with RadiaBeam, Inc.
A.H. Lumpkin BIW12 April 17, 2012 34