council recommendation

8/6/2019 Council Recommendation

1/11

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNCIL

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 30 November 2009

on smoke-free environments

(2009/C 296/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the EuropeanCommunity, and in particular the second subparagraph ofArticle 152(4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

After consulting the European Parliament (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic andSocial Committee (2),

Whereas:

(1) Article 152 of the Treaty stipulates that Communityaction, which shall complement national policies, shall

be directed towards improving public health, preventinghuman illness and diseases, and obviating sources ofdanger to human health.

(2) According to Article 137 of the Treaty, the Community

shall support and complement the activities of theMember States, inter alia, in the field of improvementin particular of the working environment to protectworkers health and safety.

(3) Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) alsoreferred to as second-hand tobacco smoke is a widespread source of mortality, morbidity and disability inthe European Union.

(4) According to conservative estimates, 7 300 adultsincluding 2 800 non-smokers died as a result of ETS

exposure at their workplace in the European Union in2002. A further 72 000 adult deaths, including those of

16 400 non-smokers, were linked to ETS exposureat home.

(5) Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke is particularlydangerous to children and adolescents and could increasethe likelihood of their taking up smoking.

(6) ETS has been classified as a known human carcinogen bythe World Health Organization (WHO) International

Agency for Research on Cancer and as an occupationalcarcinogen by Finland and Germany.

(7) All people have the right to a high level of healthprotection and should be protected from exposure totobacco smoke.

(8) Voluntary policies at national level have proved ineffective in reducing exposure to tobacco smoke.

Member States binding legislation, properly enforcedand monitored is an effective means of adequatelyprotecting people from the health risks of second-handtobacco smoke.

(9) Legislation on smoke-free environments is most effectivewhen it is backed up by measures such as awareness-raising campaigns, support for cessation of tobacco use,strong health warnings on tobacco product packagingand other regulation on tobacco products.

(10) Civil society has an important role in building supportfor and ensuring compliance with legislation on smoke-free environments.

ENC 296/4 Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2009

(1) Resolution delivered following non-mandatory consultation (not yetpublished in the Official Journal).

(2) Opinion of 5 November 2009 (not yet published in the OfficialJournal).


2/11

(11) Smoke-free policies should have adequate instruments toimplement the multi-sectorial approach to tobaccocontrol.

(12) There is a need for strengthened cooperation betweenMember States to facilitate the exchange of informationand best practice and develop a standardised EU monitoring system.

(13) The resolution of the Council and the Ministers forHealth of the Member States, meeting within theCouncil of 18 July 1989 on banning smoking inplaces open to the public (3) invited the Member Statesto take measures banning smoking in certain enclosedpremises open to the public, and to extend the ban onsmoking to all forms of public transport.

(14) Council Recommendation 2003/54/EC of 2 December2002 on the prevention of smoking and on initiativesto improve tobacco control (4) recommended thatMember States implement legislation and/or othereffective measures that provide protection fromexposure to ETS in indoor workplaces, enclosed publicplaces, and public transport.

(15) Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on theintroduction of measures to encourage improvements inthe safety and health of workers at work ( 5), while notexplicitly referring to tobacco smoke, covers all risks tothe health and safety of workers (6).

(16) In its Environment and Health Action Plan (2004-2010) (7), the Commission has undertaken to developwork on improving indoor air quality, in particular byencouraging the restriction of smoking in all workplaces

by exploring both legal mechanisms and healthpromotion initiatives at both European and Member

State level.

(17) The consultation initiated by the Commission's GreenPaper Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke:policy options at EU level (8) (the Green Paper) hasrevealed strong support both for comprehensive smoke-free policies in all enclosed workplaces and public placesand for further EU action to promote smoke-freeenvironments throughout the Member States.

(18) The Employment, Social Policy, Health and ConsumerAffairs Council held an exchange of views on policyoptions at EU level on tobacco smoke-free environmentson 30 and 31 May 2007. It welcomed the Green Paperand stressed the need for Community guidance to furtherpromote tobacco-smoke free environments at EU level,

as well as Community support for and coordination ofnational measures.

(19) The European Parliament's resolution of 24 October2007 on the Green Paper called on the Member Statesto introduce comprehensive smoke-free laws within twoyears and invited the Commission to table a relevantlegislative proposal by 2011 in the event of unsatisfactory progress. It also called on the Commission topropose an amendment to the current legislativeframework in order to classify ETS as a carcinogen and

oblige employers to ensure that the workplace is smoke-free.

(20) Article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention onTobacco Control (FCTC), signed in June 2003 by allWHO members, and so far ratified by 167 Parties,including the Community and 26 of its Member States,creates a legal obligation for its Parties to adopt andimplement in areas of existing national jurisdiction asdetermined by national law and to actively promote, atother jurisdictional levels, the adoption and implemen

tation of effective measures to protect people fromexposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in all indoorworkplaces, public transport and indoor public placesand, as appropriate, other public places.

(21) The Second Conference of the Parties to FCTC in July2007 adopted guidelines on protection from exposure totobacco smoke (9) to assist Parties in meeting their obligations under Article 8 of the Convention. Each Partyshould strive to implement the guidelines within fiveyears of the Convention's entry into force for that Party.

(22) Article 14 of the WHO Framework Convention creates alegal obligation for its Parties to develop and disseminateappropriate, comprehensive and integrated guidelines

based on scientific evidence and best practices and totake effective measures to promote the cessation oftobacco use and adequate treatment for tobaccodependence. The Third Conference of the Parties to theWHO Framework Convention decided to establish aworking group for the elaboration of guidelines forimplementation of that Article.

EN5.12.2009 Official Journal of the European Union C 296/5

(3) OJ C 189, 26.7.1989, p. 1.(4) OJ L 22, 25.1.2003, p. 31.(5) OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1.(6) Cf. Case C-49/00 Commission v. Italy, [2001] ECR I-8575,

paragraphs 12-13.(7) COM(2004) 416 final.(8) COM(2007) 27 final.

(9) FCTC/COP2(7) Guidelines on protection from exposure to tobaccosmoke, as elaborated by the working group convened in accordancewith decision FCTC/COP1(15) of the Conference of the Parties to theWHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.


3/11

(23) The European Strategy on Tobacco Control adopted bythe WHO Regional Committee for Europe in September2002 recommended that Member States ensure thecitizens right to a smoke-free environment by, interalia, making public places, workplaces and publictransport smoke-free, banning smoking outdoors in all

educational institutions for minors, in all places ofhealthcare delivery and at public events, as well as classifying ETS as a carcinogen.

(24) This Recommendation is without prejudice to theCommunity legislation laying down minimumrequirements for the safety and health protection ofworkers adopted under Article 137 of the Treaty, toDirective 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament andof the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximationof the laws, regulations and administrative provisions

of the Member States concerning the manufacture, pre-sentation and sale of tobacco products (10) and toCommission Decision 2003/641/EC of 5 September2003 on the use of colour photographs or other illustrations as health warnings on tobacco packages (11),

HEREBY RECOMMENDS THAT THE MEMBER STATES:

1. provide effective protection from exposure to tobacco smokein indoor workplaces, indoor public places, public transportand, as appropriate, other public places as stipulated byArticle 8 of the WHO Framework Convention on TobaccoControl (FCTC) and based on the annexed guidelines onprotection from exposure to tobacco smoke adopted bythe Second Conference of the Parties to FCTC, within fiveyears of the FCTCs entry into force for that Member State,or at the latest within three years following the adoption ofthis Recommendation;

2. develop and/or strengthen strategies and measures to reduce

exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke of children andadolescents;

3. complement smoke-free policies with supporting measures,which may include:

(a) taking effective measures to promote cessation oftobacco use and adequate treatment for tobacco

dependence, taking into account national circumstancesand priorities as outlined in Article 14 of the FCTC; and

(b) introducing combined warnings, as defined byArticle 2(4) of Commission Decision 2003/641/EC of5 September 2003 on the use of colour photographsor other illustrations as health warnings on tobaccopackages (12), and information on services supportingthe cessation of tobacco use on the packages of

smoking tobacco products in order to better informconsumers about the health risks of tobacco use andexposure to tobacco smoke, encourage cessation oftobacco use and deter initiation;

4. develop, implement, periodically update and review comprehensive multi-sectoral tobacco control strategies, plans orprogrammes which address, inter alia, the issue of protectionfrom tobacco smoke in all places accessible to the generalpublic or places of collective use, regardless of ownership orright to access;

5. provide adequate instruments to implement nationalstrategies, tobacco control policies and programmes inorder to ensure effective protection from exposure totobacco smoke;

6. communicate to the Commission, if possible within sixmonths after the adoption of this Recommendation,national focal points for tobacco control with a view toexchanging information and best practices as well as policy

coordination with other Member States;

7. cooperate closely among themselves and with theCommission on a coherent framework of definitions,

benchmarks and indicators for the implementation of thisRecommendation;

8. monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of policy measuresusing the above-mentioned indicators;

9. inform the Commission of legislative and other action takenin response to this Recommendation and of the results ofmonitoring and evaluation,

HEREBY INVITES THE COMMISSION TO:

1. report on the implementation, functioning and impacts ofthe proposed measures, on the basis of the informationprovided by Member States;


(10) OJ L 194, 18.7.2001, p. 26.(11) OJ L 226, 10.9.2003, p. 24. (12) See footnote 11.


4/11

2. in the context of a possible revision of Directive 2001/37/EC, consider all product-related measuresaimed at reducing the attractiveness and addictiveness of tobacco products;

3. analyse the legal issues and the evidence base for the impact of plain packaging, including on thefunctioning of the internal market.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2009.

For the Council

The President

S. O. LITTORIN



5/11

ANNEX

Guidelines on protection from exposure to tobacco smoke, as adopted by the Second Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONSPurpose of the guidelines

1. Consistent with other provisions of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and the intentions of theConference of the Parties, these guidelines are intended to assist Parties in meeting their obligations under Article 8 ofthe Convention. They draw on the best available evidence and the experience of Parties that have successfullyimplemented effective measures to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke.

2. The guidelines contain agreed upon statements of principles and definitions of relevant terms, as well as agreed uponrecommendations for the steps required to satisfy the obligations of the Convention. In addition, the guidelinesidentify the measures necessary to achieve effective protection from the hazards of second-hand tobacco smoke.Parties are encouraged to use these guidelines not only to fulfil their legal duties under the Convention, but also tofollow best practices in protecting public health.

Objectives of the guidelines

3. These guidelines have two related objectives. The first is to assist Parties in meeting their obligations under Article 8of the WHO Framework Convention, in a manner consistent with the scientific evidence regarding exposure tosecond-hand tobacco smoke and the best practice worldwide in the implementation of smoke-free measures, in orderto establish a high standard of accountability for treaty compliance and to assist the Parties in promoting the highestattainable standard of health. The second objective is to identify the key elements of legislation necessary toeffectively protect people from exposure to tobacco smoke, as required by Article 8.

Underlying considerations

4. The development of these guidelines has been influenced by the following fundamental considerations:

(a) The duty to protect from tobacco smoke, embodied in the text of Article 8, is grounded in fundamental humanrights and freedoms. Given the dangers of breathing second-hand tobacco smoke, the duty to protect fromtobacco smoke is implicit in, inter alia, the right to life and the right to the highest attainable standard of health,as recognised in many international legal instruments (including the Constitution of the World Health Organisation, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrim-ination against Women and the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as formally incorporatedinto the preamble of the WHO Framework Convention and as recognised in the constitutions of many nations.

(b) The duty to protect individuals from tobacco smoke corresponds to an obligation by governments to enactlegislation to protect individuals against threats to their fundamental rights and freedoms. This obligation extends

to all persons, and not merely to certain populations.

(c) Several authoritative scientific bodies have determined that second-hand tobacco smoke is a carcinogen. SomeParties to the WHO Framework Convention (for example, Finland and Germany) have classified second-handtobacco smoke as a carcinogen and included the prevention of exposure to it at work in their health and safetylegislation. In addition to the requirements of Article 8, therefore, Parties may be obligated to address the hazardof exposure to tobacco smoke in accordance with their existing workplace laws or other laws governing exposureto harmful substances, including carcinogens.

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES AND RELEVANT DEFINITIONS UNDERLYING PROTECTION FROMEXPOSURE TO TOBACCO SMOKE

Principles

5. As noted in Article 4 of the WHO Framework Convention, strong political commitment is necessary to takemeasures to protect all persons from exposure to tobacco smoke. The following agreed upon principles shouldguide the implementation of Article 8 of the Convention.



6/11

Principle 1

6. Effective measures to provide protection from exposure to tobacco smoke, as envisioned by Article 8 of the WHOFramework Convention, require the total elimination of smoking and tobacco smoke in a particular space orenvironment in order to create a 100 % smoke-free environment. There is no safe level of exposure to tobaccosmoke, and notions such as a threshold value for toxicity from second-hand smoke should be rejected, as they arecontradicted by scientific evidence. Approaches other than 100 % smoke-free environments, including ventilation, air

filtration and the use of designated smoking areas (whether with separate ventilation systems or not), have repeatedly been shown to be ineffective and there is conclusive evidence, scientific and otherwise, that engineering approachesdo not protect against exposure to tobacco smoke.

Principle 2

7. All people should be protected from exposure to tobacco smoke. All indoor workplaces and indoor public placesshould be smoke free.

Principle 3

8. Legislation is necessary to protect people from exposure to tobacco smoke. Voluntary smoke-free policies haverepeatedly been shown to be ineffective and do not provide adequate protection. In order to be effective, legislation

should be simple, clear and enforceable.

Principle 4

9. Good planning and adequate resources are essential for successful implementation and enforcement of smoke-freelegislation.

Principle 5

10. Civil society has a central role in building support for and ensuring compliance with smoke-free measures, andshould be included as an active partner in the process of developing, implementing and enforcing legislation.

Principle 6

11. The implementation of smoke-free legislation, its enforcement and its impact should all be monitored and evaluated.This should include monitoring and responding to tobacco industry activities that undermine the implementationand enforcement of the legislation, as specified in Article 20.4 of the WHO Framework Convention.

Principle 7

12. The protection of people from exposure to tobacco smoke should be strengthened and expanded, if necessary; suchaction may include new or amended legislation, improved enforcement and other measures to reflect new scientificevidence and case study experiences.

Definitions

13. In developing legislation, it is important to use care in defining key terms. Several recommendations as to appropriate definitions, based on experiences in many countries, are set out here. The definitions in this section supplementthose already included in the WHO Framework Convention.

Second-hand tobacco smoke or environmental tobacco smoke

14. Several alternative terms are commonly used to describe the type of smoke addressed by Article 8 of the WHOFramework Convention. These include second-hand smoke, environmental tobacco smoke, and other people'ssmoke. Terms such as passive smoking and involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke should be avoided, asexperience in France and elsewhere suggests that the tobacco industry may use these terms to support a positionthat voluntary exposure is acceptable. Second-hand tobacco smoke, sometimes abbreviated as SHS, and environmental tobacco smoke, sometimes abbreviated ETS, are the preferable terms; these guidelines use second-handtobacco smoke.

15. Second-hand tobacco smoke can be defined as the smoke emitted from the burning end of a cigarette or from othertobacco products usually in combination with the smoke exhaled by the smoker.



7/11

16. Smoke-free air is air that is 100 % smoke free. This definition includes, but is not limited to, air in which tobaccosmoke cannot be seen, smelled, sensed or measured ( 1).

Smoking

17. This term should be defined to include being in possession or control of a lit tobacco product regardless of whetherthe smoke is being actively inhaled or exhaled.

Public places

18. While the precise definition of public places will vary between jurisdictions, it is important that legislation define thisterm as broadly as possible. The definition used should cover all places accessible to the general public or places forcollective use, regardless of ownership or right to access.

Indoor or enclosed

19. Article 8 requires protection from tobacco smoke in indoor workplaces and public places. Because there arepotential pitfalls in defining indoor areas, the experiences of various countries in defining this term should bespecifically examined. The definition should be as inclusive and as clear as possible, and care should be taken in thedefinition to avoid creating lists that may be interpreted as excluding potentially relevant indoor areas. It isrecommended that indoor (or enclosed) areas be defined to include any space covered by a roof or enclosed byone or more walls or sides, regardless of the type of material used for the roof, wall or sides, and regardless ofwhether the structure is permanent or temporary.

Workplace

20. A workplace should be defined broadly as any place used by people during their employment or work. This shouldinclude not only work done for compensation, but also voluntary work, if it is of the type for which compensation isnormally paid. In addition, workplaces include not only those places at which work is performed, but also allattached or associated places commonly used by the workers in the course of their employment, including, forexample, corridors, lifts, stairwells, lobbies, joint facilities, cafeterias, toilets, lounges, lunchrooms and alsooutbuildings such as sheds and huts. Vehicles used in the course of work are workplaces and should be specificallyidentified as such.

21. Careful consideration should be given to workplaces that are also individuals' homes or dwelling places, for example,prisons, mental health institutions or nursing homes. These places also constitute workplaces for others, who should

be protected from exposure to tobacco smoke.

Public transport

22. Public transport should be defined to include any vehicle used for the carriage of members of the public, usually forreward or commercial gain. This would include taxis.

THE SCOPE OF EFFECTIVE LEGISLATION

23. Article 8 requires the adoption of effective measures to protect people from exposure to tobacco smoke in (1) indoorworkplaces, (2) indoor public places, (3) public transport, and (4) as appropriate in other public places.

24. This creates an obligation to provide universal protection by ensuring that all indoor public places, all indoorworkplaces, all public transport and possibly other (outdoor or quasi-outdoor) public places are free fromexposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. No exemptions are justified on the basis of health or law arguments. Ifexemptions must be considered on the basis of other arguments, these should be minimal. In addition, if a Party isunable to achieve universal coverage immediately, Article 8 creates a continuing obligation to move as quickly aspossible to remove any exemptions and make the protection universal. Each Party should strive to provide universalprotection within five years of the WHO Framework Convention's entry into force for that Party.

25. No safe levels of exposure to second-hand smoke exist, and, as previously acknowledged by the Conference of the

Parties in decision FCTC/COP1(15), engineering approaches, such as ventilation, air exchange and the use ofdesignated smoking areas, do not protect against exposure to tobacco smoke.


(1) It is possible that constituent elements of tobacco smoke may exist in air in amounts too small to be measured. Attention should begiven to the possibility that the tobacco industry or the hospitality sector may attempt to exploit the limitations of this definition.


8/11

26. Protection should be provided in all indoor or enclosed workplaces, including motor vehicles used as places of work(for example, taxis, ambulances or delivery vehicles).

27. The language of the treaty requires protective measures not only in all indoor public places, but also in those other(that is, outdoor or quasi-outdoor) public places where appropriate. In identifying those outdoor and quasi-outdoor

public places where legislation is appropriate, Parties should consider the evidence as to the possible health hazards invarious settings and should act to adopt the most effective protection against exposure wherever the evidence showsthat a hazard exists.

INFORM, CONSULT AND INVOLVE THE PUBLIC TO ENSURE SUPPORT AND SMOOTHIMPLEMENTATION

28. Raising awareness among the public and opinion leaders about the risks of second-hand tobacco smoke exposurethrough ongoing information campaigns is an important role for government agencies, in partnership with civilsociety, to ensure that the public understands and supports legislative action. Key stakeholders include businesses,restaurant and hospitality associations, employer groups, trade unions, the media, health professionals, organisationsrepresenting children and young people, institutions of learning or faith, the research community and the generalpublic. Awareness-raising efforts should include consultation with affected businesses and other organisations andinstitutions in the course of developing the legislation.

29. Key messages should focus on the harm caused by second-hand tobacco smoke exposure, the fact that elimination ofsmoke indoors is the only science-based solution to ensure complete protection from exposure, the right of allworkers to be equally protected by law and the fact that there is no trade-off between health and economics, becauseexperience in an increasing number of jurisdictions shows that smoke-free environments benefit both. Publiceducation campaigns should also target settings for which legislation may not be feasible or appropriate, such asprivate homes.

30. Broad consultation with stakeholders is also essential to educate and mobilise the community and to facilitatesupport for legislation after its enactment. Once legislation is adopted, there should be an education campaignleading up to implementation of the law, the provision of information for business owners and building

managers outlining the law and their responsibilities and the production of resources, such as signage. Thesemeasures will increase the likelihood of smooth implementation and high levels of voluntary compliance.Messages to empower non-smokers and to thank smokers for complying with the law will promote publicinvolvement in enforcement and smooth implementation.

ENFORCEMENT

Duty of compliance

31. Effective legislation should impose legal responsibilities for compliance on both affected business establishments andindividual smokers, and should provide penalties for violations, which should apply to businesses and, possibly,smokers. Enforcement should ordinarily focus on business establishments. The legislation should place the responsibility for compliance on the owner, manager or other person in charge of the premises, and should clearly identifythe actions he or she is required to take. These duties should include:

(a) a duty to post clear signs at entrances and other appropriate locations indicating that smoking is not permitted.The format and content of these signs should be determined by health authorities or other agencies of thegovernment and may identify a telephone number or other mechanisms for the public to report violations andthe name of the person within the premises to whom complaints should be directed;

(b) a duty to remove any ashtrays from the premises;

(c) a duty to supervise the observance of rules;

(d) a duty to take reasonable specified steps to discourage individuals from smoking on the premises. These stepscould include asking the person not to smoke, discontinuing service, asking the person to leave the premises andcontacting a law enforcement agency or other authority.



9/11

Penalties

32. The legislation should specify fines or other monetary penalties for violations. While the size of these penalties willnecessarily reflect the specific practices and customs of each country, several principles should guide the decision.Most importantly, penalties should be sufficiently large to deter violations or else they may be ignored by violators ortreated as mere costs of doing business. Larger penalties are required to deter business violators than to deterviolations by individual smokers, who usually have fewer resources. Penalties should increase for repeated violations

and should be consistent with a country's treatment of other, equally serious offences.

33. In addition to monetary penalties, the legislation may also allow for administrative sanctions, such as the suspensionof business licences, consistent with the country's practice and legal system. These sanctions of last resort are rarelyused, but are very important for enforcing the law against any businesses that choose to defy the law repeatedly.

34. Criminal penalties for violations may be considered for inclusion, if appropriate within a country's legal and culturalcontext.

Enforcement infrastructure

35. Legislation should identify the authority or authorities responsible for enforcement, and should include a system bothfor monitoring compliance and for prosecuting violators.

36. Monitoring should include a process for inspection of businesses for compliance. It is seldom necessary to create anew inspection system for enforcement of smoke-free legislation. Instead, compliance can ordinarily be monitoredusing one or more of the mechanisms already in place for inspecting business premises and workplaces. A variety ofoptions usually exists for this purpose. In many countries, compliance inspections may be integrated into businesslicensing inspections, health and sanitation inspections, inspections for workplace health and safety, fire safetyinspections or similar programmes. It may be valuable to use several such sources of information gatheringsimultaneously.

37. Where possible, the use of inspectors or enforcement agents at the local level is recommended; this is likely toincrease the enforcement resources available and the level of compliance. This approach requires the establishment ofa national coordinating mechanism to ensure a consistent approach nationwide.

38. Regardless of the mechanism used, monitoring should be based on an overall enforcement plan, and should include aprocess for effective training of inspectors. Effective monitoring may combine regular inspections with unscheduled,surprise inspections, as well as visits made in response to complaints. Such visits may well be educative in the earlyperiod after the law takes effect, as most breaches are likely to be inadvertent. The legislation should authoriseinspectors to enter premises subject to the law and to collect samples and gather evidence, if these powers are notalready established by existing law. Similarly, the legislation should prohibit businesses from obstructing theinspectors in their work.

39. The cost of effective monitoring is not excessive. It is not necessary to hire large numbers of inspectors, becauseinspections can be accomplished using existing programmes and personnel, and because experience shows thatsmoke-free legislation quickly becomes self-enforcing (that is, predominantly enforced by the public). Only a fewprosecutions may be necessary if the legislation is implemented carefully and active efforts are made to educate

businesses and the public.

40. Although these programmes are not expensive, resources are needed to educate businesses, train inspectors, co-ordinate the inspection process and compensate personnel for inspections of businesses outside of normal workinghours. A funding mechanism should be identified for this purpose. Effective monitoring programmes have used avariety of funding sources, including dedicated tax revenues, business licensing fees and dedicated revenues from finespaid by violators.

Enforcement strategies

41. Strategic approaches to enforcement can maximise compliance, simplify the implementation of legislation and reducethe level of enforcement resources needed.



10/11


11/11

Outcomes

(a) reduction in exposure of employees to second-hand tobacco smoke in workplaces and public places;

(b) reduction in content of second-hand tobacco smoke in the air in workplaces (particularly in restaurants) andpublic places;

(c) reduction in mortality and morbidity from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke;

(d) reduction in exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in private homes;

(e) changes in smoking prevalence and smoking-related behaviours;

(f) economic impacts.


council recommendation

Documents