coye cheshire & andrew fiore june 17, 2015 // computer-mediated communication experiments in cmc...

22
Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 23, 2022 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

Post on 15-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore April 21, 2023//

Computer-Mediated Communication

Experiments in CMC

and Media Richness

Page 2: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 2

Experiments in CMC

Page 3: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 3

Experimentation vs. Observation

What’s the key difference? Assignment of treatment (or condition)

Consider the effect of smoking: How would you study it experimentally? How would you study it observationally?

Page 4: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 4

Putting Experimental Work in Context

Selection of subjects (i.e., what do they value?)

Task length and learning

Accounting for time in statistical analyses

Do not assume that an experiment is even trying to ‘recreate’ a specific real-life situation unless they explicitly say so.

Page 5: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 5

Validity in Experiments

Internal Validity

External Validity

Page 6: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 6

Internal validity: Linking causes to effects

Manipulation Effect

Hand out chocolatein class

Students will sit in different seats

?

Page 7: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 7

External validity: Generalizing from experiments

?

Page 8: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 8

Ecological validity: Approximation of real-life activity

Yamagishi et al. Resnick et al.

Page 9: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 9

Media Richness

Page 10: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 10

The sensorial parsimony of plain text

tends to entice users into engaging their

imaginations to fill in missing details while,

comparatively speaking, the richness of

stimuli in fancy [systems] has an opposite

tendency, pushing users’ imaginations

into a more passive role.— Curtis (1992)

Page 11: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 11

Rich

Page 12: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 12

Lean

Page 13: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 13

A plausible ranking?

Face-to-face

Synchronous video

Synchronous audio / asynch. video

Synchronous text / asynch. audio

Asynchronous text

Richer

Leaner

Page 14: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 14

Media choice vs. media use

Types of tasks “Uncertain” — missing information “Equivocal” — ambiguous interpretations

“Best” medium for an (un)equivocal task What do managers choose? What yields the best performance?

P.S.: What is “best performance”?

Page 15: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 15

Multiplicity of cues

Textual Production cost to encode

meaning equivalent to FTF in text

Verbal

Beyond FTF?

Non-verbal

Page 16: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 16

Feedback

Type Acknowledgment — understanding (+/–) Repair — correction or clarification Proxy — completion

Immediacy — more immediate = richer Concurrent:  synchronous nods, mm-hmms

a.k.a. backchannel

Sequential:  brief interjection

Page 17: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 17

Social presence and processing

Sense of communicating with a real person Social Identity Deindividuation Effects Also: Social Information Processing

Adaptation to the medium Salience of small cues What about time?

Page 18: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 18

The role of time

Affiliation: a slower process in leaner media?

Expected future interactions — commitment over time

Page 19: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 19

Hyperpersonal communication

Receivers overattribute from limited cues Assume similarity based on group affiliation

Senders maintain tight control over cues Selective self-presentation —

Little “given off” in text CMC

Bottom line: Exceptionally favorable perception in the face of limited information

Page 20: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 20

Mean decision time (D&K)

High cues (AV) Low cues (CMC)

Task Immed. Delayed Immed. Delayed

Low equiv. 12.21 17.00 26.29 31.53

High equiv. 13.14 14.35 18.71 23.71

Page 21: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 21

Page 22: Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness

04/21/23 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore 22

Long-term, no photos

Long-term, photosShort-term, photos

Short-term, no photos

So

cial

af

fin

ity