cp theory
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 cp theory
1/3
Agent theory
Cest la vie
Aff-fairness narrow it down to keep it fair so the neg cant run whatever they chose
Neg-education try to make the topic bigger so they can run more argument so they can educate people
Agento Good
Real world- if we disscuss real world agents then it allows us to vote forpragmatic bills.(education)
Forces them to defend their agent(education) Neg flex- allows neg to be prepared against small affs(fairness) Checks small affs (education and fairness)
o Bad Predictability-there are hundreds of agents that people can do because there
are the 3 main branches and then they devolve into more and more killing the
education in the round because they can pick any random agent they
want.(fairness and education) Not germane to the topic-you dont learn anything new because you learn all
that you need to learn in the first year or so on the topic.(education and
fairness)
o Interpretation Allowed to have a agent or so because we have a solvency advocate
o Standerds They kill predicatability cause they can pick any agent they want Not germane to the topic it kills education because we spend all the time
learning about the same cp
Start with the standard then link it then impact it They kill predictability which kills fairness which kills education
o Order Interp first Standards/voters start with 1 or so points than extend and expanded it into why
this is bad for education. Why the neg needs all of the standards it presents
Picso good
Real world Increase specific education and it encourages the you to go more in depth
o Bad Steals aff ground Kills debate focused in trivial debate and can pic out of one person or something
because it is bad
Infinitely regressive there are so many things that can be piced out of that killsfairness
-
7/30/2019 cp theory
2/3
Agent theory
Cest la vie
Plan pluso You can perm counterplan and is functionally competitive
Plan minuso Contextually different
Word pic-taking out some word in the plano Textual-difference in text of plan and cp
Bad If plans are legit off of the context because it s infinitely regressive and
allows for vague aff plans
Not predictable-all words have a arbitrary meaning and it is impossibleto know each persons conation
Real world congress looks at the function not the context Search for the best the best policy option.
Good Should be able to defend each and every word Bright line- decrease judge intervention
o Functional-changes aff implementation good
Real world education-learn about real world polices and the congresslooks for the best policy
Best policy option-dont look at some arbitrary standard Best clash
Delay(to make it context than take out should and replace it with ought)o Sever out of the inmetinace of the plan(plan -)
Can just stand up and say that we never specified when the lan would be done You define resolved that means that your plan would happen immediately they
create a moving target .A perm would be intrinsic because it adds the element
of time
Interp the cp needs to be both contextually and functionallyo Even if scenario- if we lose our interp then read context is bad and read funtucal
completion good
-
7/30/2019 cp theory
3/3
Agent theory
Cest la vie
Stateso Bad
Not real world No lit base Inf regressive-no cap on what you can fiat Logical policy Not germane to the topic
o Good Up aff ground on DAs Test intrincness Reciprocal fiat Neg flex
Condoo Interp
Aff
Limit them down to 2 arguments a cp and a K creating one condo world
Neg Should be able to test the agent, methodology, and intrinsicness
o Standards bad
Limits-depth over breadth Perf. Con Time skew
Good Logical policy makers do it all the time weigh options Strategic thinking Structural bias
Noteso Neg should read more theory than the affo Really explain how it the other team kills your standards and how they are good for the
debate
o Adv counterplan would solve for one of the affs counter plans 2ac can read add ons the only way to answer is to prove the cp can solve or
straight turn it
Perming would be a da to the aff