cpha may 28, 2014 danyaal raza 1 , andrew d. pinto 2,3
DESCRIPTION
Addressing individual income as a social determinant of health in clinical settings: A realist systematic review . CPHA May 28, 2014 Danyaal Raza 1 , Andrew D. Pinto 2,3 1. Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Addressing individual income as a social determinant of health in clinical settings:
A realist systematic review
CPHAMay 28, 2014
Danyaal Raza1, Andrew D. Pinto2,3
1. Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital
3. Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael’s Hospital
No specific financial conflict of interest. My research is funded by CIHR and the Ontario Ministry of
Health and Long-Term Care.
The premise of this discussion is working towards social justice and hence, a more healthy society. This is my objective as a physician, activist and public scholar.
I bring a privileged world-view and set of experiences to this work. I do not bring the lived experience of being a member of a
marginalized population.
ROLE OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE IN ADDRESSING HEALTH INEQUITY
Social Determinants of Health
• #SDOH
• “the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age. These circumstances are shaped by the distribution of money, power and resources at global, national and local levels”
http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/
Canadian Medical Association, 2013http://healthcaretransformation.ca/infographic-social-determinants-of-health/
WHO 2008. Final Report of the Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. p.43.
How do SDOH “get under our skin”? How do they work?
WHO. World Health Report 2008. p. 43http://www.who.int/whr/2008/08_chap3_en.pdf
WHO. World Health Report 2008. p. 43http://www.who.int/whr/2008/08_chap3_en.pdf
Opportunity for change as we move toward “people-centred” model
Features of PHC that are key to addressing health equity
• First contact• Accessible• Longitudinal• Person-focused• Coordination and navigation• Comprehensive• BOTH preventive (future needs) and curative (immediate needs)• Existing and potential connections to other systems• Political/media focus• Highly resources
Adapted from De Maeseneer et al. WHO 2007. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/csdh_media/primary_health_care_2007_en.pdf
St. Michael’s Hospital
• Established a SDOH Committee within the DFCM
• Ongoing projects:– Socio-demographic data collection– Income security health promotion– Medical-legal partnership– Childhood literacy (future)
EVIDENCE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND REALIST SYNTHESIS
Search Strategy• Published in English• Search terms used included “income intervention”,
“poverty intervention*,” “welfare advice,” “income supplement,” “social assistance,” “disability benefit,” “citizen* advice,” “counsel*” and “outreach”
• With the assistance of an information specialist, nine databases were chosen: Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, CINAHL, FRANCIS, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, MEDLINE, PAIS International
• January 1, 1990 to June 13, 2013
Inclusion/Exclusion
Inclusion/Exclusion
Potentially relevant articles identifies though electronic databases search
968 articles
Independent title & abstract review with inclusion/exclusion criteria applied
35 articles included
933 articles excluded
Independent full text review with inclusion/exclusion criteria applied
29 articles included
4 articles excluded
Key Findings• Vast majority of studies from the UK (27 of 29)• Most focused on implementation of “Citizen Advice
Bureau” workers within GP practices• Almost all interventions were focused on improving
access to state benefits• Range of sample sizes (n=62-2484), but most around 200-
300• Vast majority were observational studies; one RCT
(Mackintosh. BMC Public Health 2006)• Most reported income change outcomes, and very few
reported health outcomes
Key Findings• On average, approximately 25% of participants had
an increase in benefits, typically on the order of £100-200/month
• Most studies followed participants for 12 months• Typically took 3-6 months for benefit change to be
implemented• Health outcomes focused on QOL measures. Found
little difference before/after or between those who received benefits and those who did not.
Key Findings
• Interviews with those who received benefits:– Improved mental health– Less stress around bills, rent– Able to afford better food– Able to participate in social life
Health care team universally supportive of benefits advice. Seen as saving money and time, and improving care for patients.
Practical Tips
• Requires support from health care team and significant education of providers
• Many patients did not initially understand why referred to benefits advisor
• Small % of participants were very complex and required a great deal of support and follow-up
• Main groups that benefited were:– Elderly, particularly home-bound– New immigrants– People with mental illness
Enabling characteristics
Underlying mechanisms of income security intervention
Context [family, community, society]
Patient
Context [economic, political, historical]
Health care setting
Income Security Intervention
Patient identification: in clinical encounter OR survey OR chart audit
Information & advice
Admin support/as
sist with forms
Employment
Improve financial literacy
Retraining/Education/
Rehab
Reduce expensesIncrease Income
Benefits/ grants
Help job search &
apply
Support action to improve wages
Cheaper housing
Direct advocacy
for patient
Engage other
advocatesReduce other
expenses
Reduce debt &
restructure debt
Set up bank
accountBudgeting
Change spending
habits
Increase savings
Improved Income Security
Obtain free
goods/services
Increase investm
ents
Work accommodation for disability
Context [family, community, society]
Patient
Context [economic, political, historical]
Health care setting
Income Security Intervention
Patient identification: in clinical encounter OR survey OR chart audit
Patient-health
provider relationship
AccessibleColocation Benefits counsellor-health care
team relationship
Pro-active advice
Expert benefits advice
Decreased stigma
TrustHigh
ImpactHealth Setting Embedment
Enab
ling
Char
acte
ristic
sM
echa
nism
s
Health Promoter
Patient
Provider
Improved Income Security
Post-synthesis framework
Income Security Health Promotion
Interventions:1. Increasing income• Benefits/grants• Taxes• Employment• Retraining
2. Reducing expenses3. Improving financial literacy
Phase I: Multi-institutional support
Phase II: Data and triangulation
Phase III: Meeting individual needs
Phase IV: Community collaboration
Phase V: Community leadership