cpwf‐v3 ecological externalities

10
CPWFV3 Ecological externalities Ph. Cecchi (IRD G-eau) S. Sanogo (Univ. Bobo) (logos to be added)

DESCRIPTION

CPWF Volta Science Workshop: Management of Small Reservoirs for Multiple Purposes

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

CPWF‐V3Ecological externalities

Ph. Cecchi (IRD G-eau)S. Sanogo (Univ. Bobo)

(logos to be added)

Page 2: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

1. Lakes monitoring (water level)

Level and temperature loggers installation (June 2011)

4.2 Mm3

1.2 Mm3 ≈ 30%

Usable?? By whom=> Conflicts?

? Hydro. => Filing up?

Page 3: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

1. Lakes monitoring (temperatures)

Mean depth = 2.1 mVertical Mixing sensitivity

Mechanical Buffer?

Page 4: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

2. Ceratophyllum submersumProliferation since a couple of years

1/ Strong LOCAL preoccupation:‐ Infrastructures‐ Fishery

2/ METABOLISM consequences‐ Quality & productivity

3/ SCIENTIFIC priority‐ causes & impacts

From an ecosystem perspective, the simultaneous dominance of cyanobacteriain the phytoplankton pool (> 60%) and the invasion of water massesby huge amounts of macrophyte do point out without ambiguity 

the advanced eutrophication status of the Boura reservoir.

Page 5: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

MACROPHYTES(clear)

PHYTOPLANKTON(turbid)

BEFORENOW

WHEN?

WHY?

Both states are RESILIENT

Page 6: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

Algae Turbidity

SedimentResuspension

Nutrients

Cerato

? Allelopathy

? Pesticides

? Hydrodynamics

? Agri. practices

? Origins

Fish? Structure

Diagnose: realized by V3 projectRemediation: support to local communities

Page 7: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

3. Allelopathy?

Preliminar experiments have confirmed the allelopathic potential ofCeratophyllum submersum.

Page 8: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

4. Pesticides?

Macro‐invertebrates communities exhibited contrasted patterns in agriculture‐impacted versus reference stations

Page 9: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

4. Pesticides?

Tee shirt distributed by an agrochemical company in Ghana(Binaba, April 2011).

Commercial formulation(paraquat‐based)found in fields(Boura, March 2012).

Page 10: CPWF‐V3 Ecological externalities

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

5. Perspectives: towards chemical ecology

1/ What could be the cumulative effects (antagonism / synergy / others) of both allelopathic metabolites and phytosanitary by‐products on the aquatic productivity and diversity?

2/ What could be the effects on the growth performancesof irrigated cultures?

3/ Implementation of dedicated experiments using pesticides collectedby passive samplers (in situ), pure molecules (paraquat) and allelopathic metabolites

4/ Impacts on aquatic food web structure and on selected irrigated crops.

Output: better understanding of the nexus linking‘Agricultural Intensification’ & ‘Ecosystem Resilience’…