creating a sustainable society: dynamics of renewable resources jason jay lecturer in sustainability...
TRANSCRIPT
Creating a Sustainable Society: Dynamics of Renewable
Resources
Jason JayLecturer in Sustainability
MIT Sloan School of [email protected]
web.mit.edu/jjay/www
Slides care of John Sterman
Fishbanks Debrief
Winslow Homer, Fishing Boats, Key West (1903)
“The Tragedy of The Commons”Garrett Hardin. Science 1968; 162:1243-8.
G. Hardin, 1915-2003
Photo: 1986
The Tragedy of the Commons
“No technical solution can rescue us.…”
“Each man is locked into a system that compels him to increase his herd without limit—in a world that is limited. Ruin is the destination toward which all men rush, each pursuing his own best interest…”
“We may well call it ‘the tragedy of the commons,’ using the word ‘tragedy’ as the philosopher Whitehead used it: ‘The essence of dramatic tragedy is not unhappiness. It resides in the solemnity of the remorseless working of things.’
“Common Pool Resources”
•Limited Stock•Limited Rate of Renewal•Easily Appropriable (Low barriers to access)•Rival (What you use, I can’t use)
EXAMPLES:• Pastures• Fish• Forests• Irrigation• Clean Air & Water• Climate
• Roads and Highways• Parking Spaces• Views• Server Resources• Trust among consumers
The IcebergA Metaphor for Systems Thinking
Patterns of Behavior
Systemic Structure
Mo
re Leverag
e
Events
Event level: the Headlines
Loopholes foundIn fishing rules
Fishing bannedat Georges BankLocal fishermen fear overcrowding
Lobstermen Snag record38m pounds
Codfish depleted off MaineRestrictions couldHurt local fishermen
N.E. lawmakers seek boat buyback ideas
Hearing casts fishery as sinking ship
Canada’s GunboatDiplomacyChrétien to protectAtlantic fish stocks
Limits may followas cod diminishes in Gulf of Maine
Feds approve boat buyback programHope to thin fishing fleet with $2m in incentives
Typical Game Behavior
Fish
Catch
Ships
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 YEAR
Typical Game Behavior - Fleet
Typical Game Behavior - Catch
Typical Game Behavior - Fish Stocks
Pattern #1: Overshoot and Collapse
Atlantic SwordfishCatch
0
1
2
3
4
5
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Th
ou
san
d M
etr
ic T
on
s/ye
ar
Pacific Bluefin TunaCatch
0
4
8
12
16
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Th
ou
san
d M
etri
c To
ns/
year
North Sea Herring Catch
Mark Wise, Common Fisheries Policy of the European Community, New York, Methuen, 1984.
Consider the Cod
• Northern or Atlantic Cod–Long-lived, slow to mature–Once immensely abundant
• Early fishers (e.g., Basque) claimed fish so dense you could walk from Spain to the New World on their backs.
• John Cabot, exploring Newfoundland in 1497, noted fish so thick they practically blocked his ship.
–Harvest ≈ 250,000 metric tons/yr through 1950s–Vital in feeding the Old World, in the development of the New World, …and of Massachusetts:
The Sacred CodMassachusetts State House
Prevailing Mental Model: Unlimited Abundance
“Probably all the great fisheries are inexhaustible; that is to say that nothing we do seriously affects the number of fish.”
– Thomas Henry Huxley, 1883
Source: US National Marine Fisheries Service
Estimated Biomass in 1852
Estimated Carrying Capacity (Myers et al. 2001)
1200
800
400
0
1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1980
Total Cod Biomass
Total Cod Biomass Age 5+
Estimated Cod Stocks, Scotian Shelf(000 Metric Tons)
Rosenberg et al., Frontiers in Ecology, 2005
Overshoot and Collapse
Why the pervasive pattern of overshoot and collapse of fisheries?
Time
An
nu
al f
ish
cat
ch
Where are the leverage points for creating a sustainable fishery?
Where are they not?
The IcebergA Metaphor for Systems Thinking
Patterns of Behavior
Systemic Structure
Mo
re Leverag
e
Events
Collective Action
Elinor Ostrom: Winner, 2009 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
“Common Pool Resources”
•Limited Stock•Limited Rate of Renewal•Easily Appropriable (Low barriers to access)•Rival (What you use, I can’t use)
EXAMPLES:• Pastures• Fish• Forests• Irrigation• Clean Air & Water• Climate
• Roads and Highways• Parking Spaces• Views• Server Resources• Trust among consumers
Rule-Base for Alanya
• List of eligible fishers each September• List all usable fishing spots• Assign spots by lottery – one per fisher• September – January: Each day each fisher
moves east to next spot • January – May: Each day each fisher
moves west to next spot
Individuals know the boundaries and limitsOf the resource (“Common Pool Resource”)Of the community of users (“Appropriators”)Rules are locally made and adapted to contextDecisions are made togetherActive measurement and monitoringEffective, graduated sanctionsAccessible mechanisms for conflict resolutionLatitude from higher authorities to act locally
Design Principles for “Governing the Commons”
Teaching Resources
• MIT Sloan Learning Edge• https://mitsloan.mit.edu/LearningEdge
1. Renewable resources can be used no faster than the rate at which they regenerate.
2. Pollution and wastes can be emitted no faster than natural systems can absorb them, recycle them, or render them harmless.
3. Nonrenewable resources can be used no faster than renewable substitutes can be introduced.
Source: Herman Daly
1. Renewable resources can be used no faster than they regenerate.
2. Pollution and wastes can be emitted no faster than natural systems can absorb them, recycle them, or render them harmless.
3. Nonrenewable resources can be used no faster than renewable substitutes can be introduced.
Source: Herman Daly (e.g., H. Daly (1990) Ecological Economics 2, 1).
Hu
man
Activ
ityEcosyste
m S
erv
ices
Planetary Boundaries
Rockström, J. et al. (2009) A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature 461 (24 Sept.) 472-475.
Beyond the Limits
Approaching the Limits
Mental Models about the Environment
Economy
The economy is the only consideration;There are no limits to growthEnvironmental inputs not needed for production:
Q = f(K, L, T)
Economic output = function of capital, labor, and technology,With no need for energy, water, clean air, stable climate, or any other ecosystem services.
Mental Models about the Environment
Environment Society
Economy
Triple Bottom Line:
Economic outcomes (firm profit, national income) only one consideration; important to consider impact of firm and national activities on social and environmental concerns.
But: frames each of these domains as separate, in opposition.
Mental Models about the Environment
Environment
Society
Economy
In actuality:
Only one world, no boundaries (political, ideological, other) visible from space. Boundaries are “invisible fences in the mind” (Sterman 2002)
Sterman, J. D. (2002). All Models are Wrong: Reflections on Becoming a Systems Scientist. System Dynamics Review 18(4): 501-531.
Mental Models about the Environment
Environment
Society
Economy
The economy, society and environment are not in opposition.
Economic activity is embedded in a social and political context, which in turn is embedded in the ecosystems of the world upon which all life depends.
Destroy the environment and you destroy the economy.
Another example
Home Energy Costs Drive Housing Affordability 2003 to 2008
• Average Household Energy Costs 2002-2003: 3.5% of median income
• Average Household Energy Costs 2007-2008: 8.5% of median income
• Median Household Income: $60,000• Increase in Annual Energy Costs: $3,000
Transportation Energy Cost
• Household miles driven/yr: 40,000• Miles/gallon: 20• Gallons consumed: 2,000• 2002-2003 price: $1.50/gallon• 2006-2008 price: $3.50• Increase in costs per household: $4,000/yr
The Result: Economic Meltdown
• American families saw a 15% drop in after-tax income
• This was the only substantial change to the economy
• $583 per month drop in disposable income• Any homeowner on a tight budget was
pushed over the edge
The Result: Housing crisis, then economic meltdown due to housing-based financial products
Quarterly U.S. All Grades Conventional Retail Gasoline Prices
0
100
200300
400
500
Q1
1995
Q1
1996
Q1
1997
Q1
1998
Q1
1999
Q1
2000
Q1
2001
Q1
2002
Q1
2003
Q1
2004
Q1
2005
Q1
2006
Q1
2007
Q1
2008
Q1
2009
Q1
2010
(Cents per Gallon)Mortgage Payments Past Due 60-89 Days: United States (SA, %)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Q1
1995
Q1
1996
Q1
1997
Q1
1998
Q1
1999
Q1
2000
Q1
2001
Q1
2002
Q1
2003
Q1
2004
Q1
2005
Q1
2006
Q1
2007
Q1
2008
Q1
2009
Q1
2010
Causes of Overshoot
• Market failures Externalities Common Pool Resource (Tragedy of the Commons)
• Long Delays in Changes in Resource level (Physical/Biological
delay)Measuring resource level (Perception delay)Understanding causes (Research delay)Recommending action (Political/social delay)Implementing policies (Political/social delay)Policy impact (Physical/Biological
delay)
Note: Delays are partly physical and partly political and social. Those with vested interests in the status quo often misrepresent the situation to delay action (e.g. tobacco, lead in gasoline, toxics in food, climate change).
Causes of Collapse
Collapse of the carrying capacity can occur when underlying resources are
Nonrenewable or
Renewable but Consumable or Degradable
Collapse is worse with Slow or limited regeneration potential Tipping points created by positive feedbacks Irreversibilities due to e.g.
Trophic cascadeEvolutionary impacts
Common pool resources (Tragedy of the Commons)
World Population Growth November 2010:6.88 Billion
Net Increase today: ≈ 77 million/year
Gross World Product, 1950-2008
Ave Growth Rate ≈ 3.5%/year
Doubling Time ≈ 20 years
At that rate, in 100 years GWP will be 32 times larger
http
://d
atab
ank.
wor
ldba
nk.o
rg
If everyone lived like Americans do today*
Pho
to: J
. Ste
rman
In 2050, 9 Billion people would be driving 7.8 billion passenger vehicles,consuming 382 Million barrels of oil per day (> 5 times total world production today),emitting 60 Billion tons of CO2 per year (almost double total world emissions today),and taking up 143,000 sq. kilometers (an area the size of Bangladesh) just in parking spaces.
* 2008 data
Possible Futures
Time
HumanActivity
S-shaped Growth:Smooth, gradual transition to equilibrium
Fluctuation around
equilibrium
Overshoot and decline
How will growth end?Growth in human activity cannot continue
indefinitely.
How will we make the transition?
Voluntarily or involuntarily?
Sustainably or unsustainably?
What population?
What standard of living?
What quality of life?
What degree of equity?
What role for nature, other species?
How robust to surprises?
Growth Arises from Positive Feedback
Adding the Carrying Capacity of the Environment:
the Naïve Malthusian
Carrying Capacity is DynamicCarrying Capacity:
LandSoil FertilityMaterial ResourcesEnergy ResourcesClean WaterClean AirWaste Absorption CapacityFavorable ClimateBiodiversityEtc.
We Alter the Carrying Capacity
Technological Innovation
The Impact of Delays
Delays due to population age structure; slow adjustment of norms for family size & income aspirations; slow change in infrastructure & settlement patterns, etc.
The Impact of Delays
Delays in perceiving environmental problems, building scientific consensus, political will, passing legislation; Delays in reaction of markets due to corporate opposition, inertia; time needed to reallocate resources and build research infrastructure. Delays lengthened by opposition of entrenched corporate & political interests (e.g,. CAFE standards, CFCs, climate change).
Delay in creating and testing technologies: Building research resources, knowledge base; developing ideas, testing and evaluation, commercialization & scale up, field testing, learning-by-doing, side effect evaluation & defect correction.
The Impact of Delays
Delays due to physical processes in environmentExamples: Ozone Depletion, Chlorinated Hydrocarbons accumulating up food chain, Global Warming.
Diffusion and deployment delays caused by long lifetimes of existing structures, infrastructure, plant and equipmentIncreased by organizational inertia, lock in to existing infrastructure, complementary assets, income inequality, intellectual property laws, local resistance to globalization.
The Precautionary Principle can reduce the risk of Harmful Side Effects from new technologies.
But the PP entails long delays in the evaluation of new technologies and slow, gradual diffusion, weakening the Technological Fix feedback.
Shortening the delays in the Technological Fix feedback to avoid limits to growth increases odds of harmful side effects.
Technology is not always helpful or benign. Technologies designed to solve one problem often create others. Examples: DDT, Nuclear Power, Dams, automobiles, many others.
Technological Side Effects
Loss of carrying capacity can compromise the ability of the environment to regenerate, leading to a vicious cycle that further erodes the carrying capacity. Examples: Overfishing, Albedo feedback and warming, desertification, ecosystem collapse
Self-reinforcing Collapse of Carrying Capacity?
Different Models, Different Futures
Where is the leverage to create a sustainable world?
Socio-technical innovation
V&V
I&S
I&RSTI
PC&L
Scaled Solutions to Sustainability Challenges
Strategies for Sustainable Business
From: Porter & Kramer, 2006. “Strategy and Society.” Harvard Business Review.
From: Porter & Kramer, 2006. “Strategy and Society.” Harvard Business Review.
From: Porter & Kramer, 2006. “Strategy and Society.” Harvard Business Review.