creation of national norms for scientific...

195
CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC THINKING SKILLS USING THE CLASSROOM TEST OF SCIENTIFIC REASONING BY JACQUELINE RENEE O’DONNELL A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY 2011

Upload: others

Post on 02-Mar-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC THINKING SKILLS

USING THE CLASSROOM TEST OF SCIENTIFIC REASONING

BY

JACQUELINE RENEE O’DONNELL

A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF

MASTER OF SCIENCE

IN

EDUCATION

WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY

2011

Page 2: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

MASTER OF SCIENCE THESIS

OF

JACQUELINE RENEE O’DONNELL

APPROVED:

Thesis Committee:

Major Professor

DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY

2011

Page 3: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

ABSTRACT

The educational community has begun to target thinking skills, which are

required for today’s students not only to succeed in post-secondary education, but

also to be successful in life outside the realm of academics. Historically, many inter-

ventions in classroom materials and instructional strategies have positively affected

students’ thinking skills. However, many different assessments are used to measure

these skills, making broader comparisons of results more difficult. The multiple-

choice, revised version of the Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTSR) was

utilized to create national thinking skill norms as it is the most frequently used

scientific thinking skill assessment in the United States. Data have been collected

from thirty-five different secondary schools in three states (Minnesota, Montana,

and Wisconsin) resulting in 6,629 data points. From the analysis of data and Pi-

aget’s theory of cognitive development, researchers found that more than 50% of

students in grades seven through nine are only concrete thinkers and more than

85% of students graduating high school are not considered to be formal thinkers.

Educators can use these data to track individual students, classes, and grade lev-

els thinking skills development and determine the best possible interventions to

improve students abilities.

Page 4: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

First and foremost, I offer my sincerest gratitude to my research advisor, John

C. Deming, for his advice and continual support throughout my graduate program

and the preparation of this thesis. I could not have completed this work without

his criticisms, guidance, and assistance. It is an honor for me to have worked under

the direction and with the friendship of an extraordinary individual, such as John.

He has instilled in me an inordinate amount of intellectual and personal growth

that I will never forget. For this, I am indebted to him more than he knows.

Thank you to all the educators and students who participated in the data

collection portion of this research, as this would not have been possible without

you. Gratitude is expressed to the College of Education at Winona State University

for the opportunity to conduct this research and the funding that made it possible.

It is my pleasure to thank Nathan Moore for his incredible ability and support

in writing this thesis. For his willing and able assistance in the data analysis

portion, I gratefully thank Christopher Malone. I would also like to acknowledge

Rhea Walker for her encouragement throughout my studies. A special thanks to

the members of the John C. Deming Research Group for all your discussions and

support, without which I would not have made it thus far.

My parents also deserve a sincere thank you for many years of support and

impressing in me the true value of education as well as the conviction to obtain

whatever it is that I may desire.

Finally, I am deeply appreciative of my husband, Timothy O’Donnell, for his

patience and understanding of my educational goals. His invaluable encourage-

ment and support throughout the entire program has significantly added to my

willingness and confidence to succeed.

iii

Page 5: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

GLOSSARY

Alternative hypotheses (p. 12): a conception or hypothesis that is not consis-

tent with the scientifically-accepted hypothesis.

Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (p. 5): a dynamic,

web-based assessment developed by Kereen Monteyne and Mark Cracolice

(2004) to effectively measure higher-order thinking skills.

Classification (p. 4): a concrete thinking skill utilizing of more than one

principle to organize familiar objects or ideas into groups or categories

(Adey et al., 2001).

Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTSR) (p. 5): assessment devel-

oped by Anton Lawson (1978), revised in 2000 to contain thirteen multiple-

choice items that measures student thinking skills.

Combinational reasoning (p. 4): a formal thinking skill considering all pos-

sible relations between experimental conditions in a systematic manner

(Fuller et al., 1977).

Concrete operational stage (p. 28): the third stage of Piaget’s stage theory of

cognitive development, which typically begins around age seven, when chil-

dren can mentally manipulate observable and familiar objects (Piaget, 1964).

Concrete thinking skills (p. 4): reasoning abilities that children develop during

Piaget’s concrete operational stage.

Conservation of number (p. 4): a concrete thinking skill utilizing the ability to

reason that, if nothing is added or taken away, even though the appearance

may be different, the number of objects remain the same (Fuller et al., 1977).

iv

Page 6: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

Correlational reasoning (p. 4): a formal thinking skill that requires the de-

scription of the associations between dependant and independent variables

(Adey et al., 2001).

Cumulative density plots (p. 17): a graphical representation of the probability

of obtaining a certain value, or any value less than that, of a particular

variable (e.g., CTSR score).

Deductive reasoning (p. 4): a formal thinking skill allowing individuals to men-

tally infer an expected outcome of combining a hypothesis (or generalization)

with a proposed experiment (or observation) (Lawson, 2002).

Equilibration (p. 4): the ability of an individual to self-regulate maturation,

experience, and social transmission to gather and understand information

(Piaget, 1964).

Flynn effect (p. 1): a significant increase in the average IQ score that requires

a re-calibration of intelligence tests.

Formal operational stage (p. 28): the fourth, and final stage, of Piaget’s stage

theory of cognitive development when individuals can remove the context

of the problem and reason through a hypothesis, instead of focusing on the

objects themselves (Piaget, 1964). This theoretically begins near the ages of

eleven and twelve (Piaget, 1928).

Formal thinking skills (p. 4): reasoning abilities that individuals develop dur-

ing Piaget’s formal operational stage.

Formative assessment (p. 2): an evaluation utilized to measure students’

achievement.

v

Page 7: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

Frameworks for Inquiry Workshop (p. 14): a seminar that informs educa-

tors of existing inquiry materials, techniques used to properly implement the

materials, and methods of developing their own inquiry materials. These

workshops also aim to develop learning communities with both administra-

tive and university support.

General Certification of Secondary Education (GCSE) (p. 18): a stan-

dardized test used in Britain that students take in their fifth year of secondary

school to be admitted to college.

Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT) (p. 5): a twenty-one-item

assessment developed by Vantipa Roadrangka (1991) used to evaluate student

abilities in six operational skills.

Higher-order thinking questions (p. 11): questions that focus on an overall

concept rather than procedures; typically require students to synthesize, an-

alyze, and reason through unfamiliar situations (Zoller and Tsaparlis, 1997).

Institutional Review Board (p. 14): reviews all research involving human

subjects and must approve the study for continuation.

Lawson’s hypothesis-testing levels (p. 10): four groups used to classify stu-

dent reasoning abilities (i.e., Level 0 = 0–3; Low Level 1 = 4–6; High Level

1 =7–10; Level 2 = 11–13) (Lawson et al., 2000).

Linear regression model (p. 16): a method of describing a possible correlation

between variable x and variable y while assuming a direct relationship.

Lower-order thinking questions (p. 11): questions that are familiar to the

students and require simple applications (or memorized procedures) of the

theory in order to answer correctly (Zoller and Tsaparlis, 1997).

vi

Page 8: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

National School Lunch Act (p. 18): approved by Congress in

1946 and enabled schools to provide lunches to children, who

could not otherwise afford them, for free or at a reduced-rate

(United States Department of Agriculture, 2011).

National School Lunch Program (NSLP) (p. 18): the program that

has developed from the National School Lunch Act, in which schools

enroll to make it possible for all students to receive a healthy meal

(United States Department of Agriculture, 2011).

Piagets theory of cognitive development (p. 4): a theory of four thinking

stages, in which all children pass through in a particular order (Slavin, 2009).

Within each stage, students are to develop reasoning abilities developmen-

tally appropriate for that stage, and then when students complete a stage

they begin to develop abilities required in the next stage.

Piagetian thinking levels (p. 6): stages that correspond to Piaget’s theory of

cognitive development (i.e., sensory-motor, preoperational, concrete opera-

tional, and formal operational).

Probability (p. 4): a formal thinking skill that requires the understanding that

random variation affects ordinary events, and any model to explain these

types of experiences needs to incorporate the knowledge of chance and causal-

ity (Adey et al., 2001).

Proportionality (p. 4): a formal thinking skill requiring an individual to men-

tally manipulate four different variables to compare and equilibrate two ratios

(Adey et al., 2001).

Reliability (p. 6): statistical analysis of the variation in testing measurements

vii

Page 9: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

(i.e., good reliability is indicated by consistent, repeatable results).

Reversibility (p. 4): a concrete thinking skill that requires the ability for a

student to cognitively transpose a sequence of events to return to the starting

state from the final state (Fuller et al., 1977).

Scientific Reasoning Tasks (SRTs) (p. 5): assessment to measure student

thinking ability, developed by Michael Shayer, Philip Adey, and David Warry

(1981). These included class discussions and individual problem-solving.

Scientific thinking skills (p. 2): reasoning patterns used when solving problems

both in general and within a specific context.

Serial Ordering (p. 4): a concrete thinking skill, in which an individual ar-

ranges a number of items or data in a progressive sequence using only one

characteristic (e.g., size, color, etc.) (Adey et al., 2002; Fuller et al., 1977).

Social transmission (p. 4): one of four factors needed for an individual to

develop from one thinking stage to another, requires an individual to receive

information from others and have the ability to understand that information

(Piaget, 1964).

Standardized tests (p. 1): uniform assessments that allow for comparisons

between students populations (e.g., SAT, ACT, GCSE, AP exams).

Test of Logical Thinking (TOLT) (p. 5): assessment developed by Kenneth

Tobin and William Capie (1981) that utilized classroom demonstrations to

assess student thinking abilities.

Validity (p. 7): the extent to which a measure supports the hypothesized theory.

viii

Page 10: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

Variable Manipulation (p. 4): a formal thinking skill requiring indi-

viduals to systematically identify and control experimental conditions

(Adey et al., 2001).

ix

Page 11: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii

GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x

LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii

LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiv

CHAPTER

1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.1 Intellectual Merit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.2 Broader Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2 Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.1 Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2 SRTs Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

2.3 TOLT Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.4 GALT Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

2.5 HOTS Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

2.6 CTSR Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

2.7 What do These Assessments Measure? . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

3 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

3.1 Selection of CTSR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

x

Page 12: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

Page

xi

3.2 Data Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

3.3 Subjects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

3.4 Composite Sketch of Schools Sampled . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

3.5 Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

3.5.1 Construction of Normalized Curves . . . . . . . . . . 16

3.5.2 Students at Various Thinking Skill Levels . . . . . . 17

3.5.3 Other Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

4.1 Composite Sketch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

4.2 Grade Level Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

4.3 Socioeconomic Status and Thinking Skills . . . . . . . . . . 23

4.4 Gender and Thinking Skills Correlation . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

5.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

5.2 Educational Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

5.3 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

APPENDIX

A CTSR Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

B Free/Reduced-Rate Lunch Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172

C Demographic Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

D Google Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

Page 13: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

Page

xii

D.1 Educator Request Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

D.2 CTSR Data Collection Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176

Page 14: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1 School Demographics – Summary of all data collected in thisstudy including city population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000),school enrollment, percentage of school sampled,and socioeconomic status assessed in Minnesota,(Minnesota Department of Education, 2010) Wisconsin,(Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, 2011) and Mon-tana (Montana Office of Public Instruction, 2006). *Thepercentage of students qualifying for free/reduced lunch in eachschool was used to estimate the percentage of families livingat or below 185% of the national poverty level in this study(United States Department of Agriculture, 2011), indicatingsocioeconomic status of the areas sampled. The data compiledto construct this table can be viewed in Appendix C. . . . . . . 16

2 CTSR Gender Comparison – Summary of simple statisticsfor females, males, and all students sorted by grade level. . . . . 27

xiii

Page 15: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Map of Schools Sampled – This figure was constructed withGoogle maps (Google, 2011). Each marker represents a schoolincluded in this study. The schools span over 1,500 miles of thenorthern United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2 Grade Level National Norms – Cumulative density plots forgrades seven through twelve. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

3 Students’ Grade Level Thinking Skills – Percentage of stu-dents sampled in each Piagetian-correlated thinking stage sortedby grade level. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

4 Condensed National Norms – Comparison of Grades 7-9,Grades 10-11, and Grade 12 average CTSR norms. . . . . . . . 23

5 Population Distribution of Free/Reduced-Rate Lunch –Percentage of students sampled in each grade level sorted by per-cent qualifying for free/reduced-rate lunch. The free/reduced-rate lunch percentage mean is 29.56%, with a median percentageof 24%, and a standard deviation of 20.5% with a sample sizeof 6547 students. The following example is included to ease in-terpretation. For schools with 81-90% of students qualifying forfree/reduced-rate lunch (far right column), 51.5% of those stu-dents were in grade nine, while 15.1%, 22.0%, and 11.4% werein grades ten, eleven, and twelve respectively. . . . . . . . . . . 24

6 Correlation Between CTSR Score and SocioeconomicStatus – Average CTSR score as a function of percentage offree/reduced-rate lunch qualification for each grade level. . . . . 25

7 Gender Differences in National Norms – Comparison ofthe average CTSR scores for grade levels 7–9 and 10–12 forboth females and males. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

8 CTSR Target Goal - Shows the current grades 7-12 average and the development potential of secondaryschool students based on the work of Inhelder and Piaget(Inhelder and Piaget, 1958; Piaget, 1928). . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

xiv

Page 16: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

Figure Page

xv

9 Educational Implications of CTSR - This figure illustrateshow a teacher could utilize these data when comparing their in-dividual class to the national norm as well as the developmentalpotential. In this case, the teacher should focus his or her atten-tion on thinking skills development rather than content, at leastuntil students makeup their deficiencies. Thinking skills cannotbe taught in absence of content; however, the focus should beshifted in order to remediate the deficiencies as quickly as possible. 32

Page 17: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

1.1 Intellectual Merit

In sampling more than 10,000 children over a period of 15 years, Michael

Shayer has found that the average seventh grader is currently scoring about three

years behind where they were scoring one and a half decades ago on a static

thinking skills assessment (Crace, 2006). Even though this study was completed

in England, that does not mean the same thing is not occurring in the United

States. These results are not what one going into the field of education would

want to hear, nor are they what one would expect to hear considering the norm of

100 on intelligence tests needs to be adjusted about once every 15 years because

children’s scores consistently improve (i.e., the Flynn effect) (Crace, 2006). How

are these test scores continually increasing while, at the same time, the students’

thinking skills scores decline? Many answers to this question have been proposed,

from the possibility that teachers have learned to teach to the test or the tests

themselves, as they are dynamic from year to year and are unintentionally (or

intentionally) becoming easier (Crace, 2006).

Today, educators face the enormous task of developing a method that will

teach all students to think and solve problems. This is a time-sensitive issue, as

prospective employers are looking for candidates that can communicate and work

cooperatively in teams with other co-workers (Wagner, 2008) in order to think

through and solve problems. The future success of this country (Wagner, 2008)

will be determined by educators’ response to this challenge. One could propose

that teachers need access to different textbooks and more standardized tests to

assess abilities. However, that is not enough. Educators and policy makers alike

need to understand students’ intellectual ability and determine the best method

1

Page 18: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

1.2 Broader Impact 2

to bridge the developmental thinking skills gap.

To resolve the issue of students falling behind their developmental poten-

tial, there have been countless interventions regarding curricula changes, in-

structional strategies, and classroom culture throughout the last few decades

(e.g., (Adey and Shayer, 1990; Iqbal and Shayer, 2000; Endler and Bond, 2008;

Deming and Moore, 2009)). Most intervention programs are targeted in a spe-

cific context, (i.e., the interventions may be taught in a science, mathematics, or

English classroom) but typically the interventions target general skills needed to

be successful in life. Many of these interventions use a formative assessment to

measure student knowledge or skills, and with that have also showed positive gains

in these skills. One major flaw with each of these interventions is they use a va-

riety of assessment tools, meaning that a broad comparison of the results is not

possible. Teachers are not able to review these studies and determine the best

intervention for their classroom because of this shortcoming. Another issue with

these interventions is that educators may not have access to the assessments used

to measure their own students’ abilities. This does not allow teachers to determine

the effectiveness of a particular intervention in their own classroom, leaving them

to assume similar gains were attained without any actual data.

1.2 Broader Impact

The main purpose of this study is to reduce these limitations by developing

national thinking skill norms with cooperating educators from various states of

culturally, economically, and socially diverse areas. These norms would aid class-

room teachers and the educational community as a whole by allowing a broader

comparison of results between possible interventions and providing the assessment

tool used to interested educators. This will undoubtedly enhance the relationship

between educators and the educational research community by cooperatively work-

Page 19: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

1.2 Broader Impact 3

ing together, not only to develop these norms, but also to utilize them in many

instances. The results of this study also allow teachers to compare their students’

cognitive development to that of the nation in order to determine what is needed

in their specific classrooms. Once the teachers are aware of their students’ devel-

opmental potential, making informed choices regarding classroom materials and

instructional strategies is possible. These choices, made by teaching professionals

will, in turn, provide opportunities for secondary school students to develop a set

of life-long scientific thinking skills.

Page 20: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

CHAPTER 2

Literature Review

2.1 Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development

Thinking skills can be divided into four categories that are parallel to Piaget’s

theory of cognitive development. At the secondary level, educators typically en-

counter students that are either of concrete, formal, or in transition between the

two levels. Concrete thinking skills typically develop between the ages of seven and

eleven (Inhelder and Piaget, 1958) and include skills such as classification, conser-

vation of number, serial ordering, and reversibility. Formal thinking skills include

such things as probability, proportionality, deductive reasoning, variable manipu-

lation, combinational reasoning, and correlational reasoning. These skills are not

only essential in mathematics and science courses, but also are crucial to a student’s

success in life. For example, as citizens of the United States, students will vote for

the country’s future leaders, decide on a career path, and become independent; all

of which require the evaluation of evidence to make data-driven decisions. Life also

requires students to reasonably think through decisions and weigh consequences

of their potential actions. Historically, these thinking skills have been shown to

develop during adolescence. According to Piaget, students should begin to develop

these formal skills around the onset of puberty, ages eleven in girls and twelve in

boys (1966). Piaget recognized four elements that aid an individual in developing

from one developmental stage to the next, including maturation, experience, social

transmission, and equilibration (1964). Both maturation and experience are nat-

ural elements that aid in development. Maturation plays a large role in a child’s

development both physically and cognitively, and experience allows for familiarity

with objects and situations that also allow children to develop. Social transmission

or the child’s ability to not only receive information, but also process it and under-

4

Page 21: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.1 Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development 5

stand the knowledge is important (Piaget, 1964). The last element, equilibration,

is the ability of an individual to self-regulate the other three factors as none of

them are effective individually (Piaget, 1964). All of these elements are required

to progress from one stage of development to the next.

Traditionally, assessments of formal reasoning abilities were completed us-

ing interview methods to fully understand the cognitive development of a stu-

dent. These methods exposed two main difficulties that had to be overcome.

First, administering the test needed to be easier and more efficient than a com-

plete interview process. Second, scoring the assessment had to be objective

(Tobin and Capie, 1981). The ability to administer the test to a group of students

was also appealing, as this would shorten the test-administering time. Pencil-and-

paper tests would help overcome these difficulties. Consequently, many different

assessments have been developed by different researchers and are available to ed-

ucators in order to assist in measuring these types of thinking skills. However, a

new concern arose — how to ensure that students were using formal thinking skills

to correctly answer the questions (Tobin and Capie, 1981). Similar to the earliest

version of the Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTSR), many of the early

tests required students to explain their answer to each question (Lawson, 1978).

This solution reduced the amount of effort required to administer the assessment,

but the requirement for an objective scoring method was not achieved, as there

may have been some variability in the scoring of short answer or essay questions.

The following is a review of five classroom tests that measure cognitive develop-

ment, including the Science Reasoning Tasks (SRTs), the Test of Logical Thinking

(TOLT), the Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT), the assessment of

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), and the CTSR.

Page 22: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.2 SRTs Discussion 6

2.2 SRTs Discussion

Michael Shayer, Philip Adey, and David Wharry developed the SRTs from

interview tasks originally utilized by Piaget and Inhelder (Shayer et al., 1981). In

most cases, each SRT focused on one problem created for a particular reasoning

task, and students needed to answer two-thirds of the questions about the task cor-

rectly to successfully complete the task (Shayer et al., 1981). During the develop-

ment stage, these tasks were given to a large sample of students and modifications

in procedure and scoring were made accordingly. Reliability was also measured

during this stage by retesting the students three months after the initial assess-

ment and analyzing the correlation between the two scores (Shayer et al., 1981).

The correlation between the test-retest was greater than 0.5 for each task, and

the internal consistency was found to be greater than 0.75 for each task, except

task II which had an internal consistency of 0.4 (Shayer et al., 1981). These num-

bers indicate that there is a strong correlation between the test and retest and a

solid internal consistency for most items on the assessment. Another large task

for the researchers was to use items in the tasks that distinguish between the

targeted Piagetian thinking levels (Shayer et al., 1981). To do this, each possible

answer was assigned a developmental stage where each possibility represented a

different stage (Shayer et al., 1981). It is also important to note that the tasks

are verbally discussed as a class, while students answer the questions individually

(Shayer et al., 1981). These discussions allow linguistically-diverse students the

opportunity to understand the problem without focusing on reading ability. The

researchers also point out that as the STRs are given throughout the curriculum,

educators are able to determine the abilities required to complete a particular unit

or section of the course content (Shayer et al., 1981). This ability to improve a

particular section of a curriculum is extremely useful to educators.

Page 23: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.3 TOLT Discussion 7

2.3 TOLT Discussion

Kenneth Tobin and William Capie used questions from previously developed

assessments (Lawson, 1978; Lawson et al., 1979) to establish a classroom test, the

TOLT, that also required students to use formal thinking abilities (1981). The

researchers chose a test format that would provide one individual the ability to ad-

minister the test to a group of students at the same time, decreasing the amount of

valuable class time used for the assessment. The use of previously-generated mate-

rials allowed the researchers to assume that they also were measuring formal think-

ing skills with credible procedures (Tobin and Capie, 1981). Demonstrations were

utilized in the original version of the TOLT, allowing students to visualize context

along with the written problem. This assessment also required students to provide

a written justification of their answer to the problem (Tobin and Capie, 1981).

One aspect that changed when the researchers revised the TOLT included chang-

ing the live demonstrations to a colored video. This eased the administration of

the assessment, because the proctor did not need to physically perform the exper-

iments or activities in front of the class. Another element that was altered was

the form of the questions on the TOLT. This assessment initially required stu-

dents to provide a written justification for their responses to a particular problem,

whereas the revised version paired two multiple choice questions together, form-

ing one item. This simplified the scoring of the TOLT (Tobin and Capie, 1981).

The strategy of pairing multiple-choice questions requires the students to both

correctly answer a problem and choose the best justification for that problem to

receive a point for the item. Overall, the researchers experienced high consistency

in reliability and validity data that were collected, and determined that the TOLT

adequately measures students formal thinking abilities in sixth grade and above

(Tobin and Capie, 1981).

Page 24: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.4 GALT Discussion 8

2.4 GALT Discussion

Vantipa Roadrangka developed the twenty-one item GALT while also us-

ing many items from Lawson’s CSTR (Lawson, 1978). The main reason she

developed this assessment was to measure more than five operational skills

(Raodrangka, 1991). The skills assessed by the GALT include conservation,

proportional reasoning, controlling variables, combinatorial reasoning, proba-

bilistic reasoning, and correlational reasoning to classify students into Piage-

tian thinking skill categories (e.g., concrete and formal operational thinking)

(Raodrangka, 1991). The assessment consisted of all multiple choice items in-

cluding the justification of answers (Raodrangka, 1991). This aids in scoring and

also allows a proctor to administer the test to a large group of students at one time.

Visual representations of the situations were given for each problem by including

pictures on the test (Raodrangka, 1991). This choice reduced the emphasis on the

students’ reading ability and therefore made the test acceptable for students in the

sixth grade and above. The validity of the GALT was determined by analyzing

the correlation between clinical interviews and the results of student ability on the

assessment (Raodrangka, 1991). Roadrangka also proposed an additional use of

this assessment when time constraints do not allow students to complete the test

in one class hour, by combining two items from each skill set to make a twelve

item test that can classify students’ thinking abilities with just as much reliability

as the full version (1991).

2.5 HOTS Discussion

Even though these pencil-and-paper tests have shown to be viable measures of

formal thinking skills, the purpose of the research completed by Kereen Monteyne

and Mark Cracolice was to establish a web-based assessment that would effectively

measure these same types of higher-order thinking skills, or HOTS (2004). Utilizing

Page 25: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.6 CTSR Discussion 9

existing technology, the researchers were determined to make the assessment more

dynamic. The HOTS assessment requires less time for both the student and the ad-

ministrator than the pencil-and-paper tests and allows modifications to be made for

each student to better measure reasoning abilities (Monteyne and Cracolice, 2004).

A major flaw was discovered with the pencil-and-paper tests — the assessments

could not be adjusted for each student’s response by providing logical follow

up questions (Monteyne and Cracolice, 2004). Throughout the HOTS test there

are questions corresponding to the developmental stages of Piaget’s theory from

concrete-operational skills to formal-operational skills. Monteyne and Cracolice

combined questions from the TOLT, GALT, and CTSR to use in this paired

multiple-choice assessment (2004).

The questions were divided into groups that target each thinking skill. For

each skill, the students are given a question that is considered to be of medium

difficulty, then based on their answer they will be given an easier or more dif-

ficult question to accurately determine their ability for that skill. After com-

pleting a group of questions on a particular skill, students are assigned a score

of zero to three based on their ability to answer questions of varying difficulty

(Monteyne and Cracolice, 2004). This assessment of HOTS offers the flexibility

of an interview while providing many benefits, including immediate feedback, less

time intensive, and ease of administration to multiple students. These advantages

make the HOTS assessment both a very powerful and extremely predictive device

in measuring thinking skills.

2.6 CTSR Discussion

Anton Lawson developed the CTSR primarily as a method to accurately mea-

sure student thinking skills, but also to determine the adjustments required to the

course content and instructional methods needed to effectively teach content ma-

Page 26: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.6 CTSR Discussion 10

terial (Lawson, 1978). The CTSR utilized one set of materials to bring context

to a particular question, by demonstrating a problem, while the students wrote

their answers and explanations on a sheet of paper (Lawson, 1978). Agreement

among six experts in Piagetian research indicated that the items on the CTSR

required thinking of the concrete, early-formal, and formal levels (Lawson, 1978).

This meant that the CTSR had face validity, but to achieve statistical validity,

four standard Piagetian interview tasks were given to 72 randomly selected stu-

dents who also completed the CTSR (Lawson, 1978). Student responses to two of

the tasks were tallied and Lawson investigated the relationship between the CTSR

and these tasks (1978). A high correlation of 0.76 (p<0.001) indicates that the

assessment is strongly related to traditional Piagetian interview tasks.

Overall, this assessment was successful in measuring the same Piagetian

thinking skills of the traditional interview methods with reasonable validity

(Lawson, 1978). Since the development of this initial version of the CTSR, Law-

son has made numerous changes to this assessment to measure student thinking

skills. Different versions of the test contained different questions based on the spe-

cific study conducted by Lawson at the time. Since these early variations of the

CTSR (Lawson, 1978; Lawson, 1983; Lawson, 1985), Lawson has revised the test

to contain thirteen multiple-choice items (2000). This exam was created after the

development of the multiple-choice version of the TOLT and used similar technique

in pairing two questions (a problem and a justification) to assess the desired skills.

This decision resolved many concerns regarding the amount of time to take the test

as well as the need for objective scoring. During the study (Lawson et al., 2000),

students were assigned to one of four levels (Lawson’s hypothesis-testing levels; i.e.,

Level 0 = 0–3; Low Level 1 = 4–6; High Level 1 = 7–10; Level 2 = 11–13) for the

purpose of comparing students’ abilities to test various types of hypotheses. These

Page 27: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.7 What do These Assessments Measure? 11

should not be confused with Piagetian-correlated reasoning levels. The results

of this exam may be used to assess an individual’s cognitive ability if educators

understand both the nature of thought processes required in different Piagetian

stages and are willing to modify the course curriculum or teaching strategies to fit

the proper developmental level (Lawson, 1992).

2.7 What do These Assessments Measure?

Similar characteristics are found in all of the assessments described above.

The most important characteristic is that they can be as credible as a classical

interview in terms of estimating students’ thinking abilities (Shayer et al., 1981).

They are extremely beneficial to students and educators alike, since they apprise

teachers of the thinking skills their students have and the skills that still need

to be developed. However, teachers must also include questions that assess these

skills in exams relating to the content learned in class. In fact, these skills must

be assessed regularly throughout the academic year. If students are not regularly

assessed on these skills in the context of the course, then there is little motivation

to learn the skills (Zoller and Tsaparlis, 1997). According to Lawson, educators

need to both comprehend differences in concrete and formal thinking and have the

ability to adjust the course content, instructional strategies, and evaluation meth-

ods to the appropriate developmental level of the class (1978). It is important for

teachers to include both lower-order and higher-order thinking questions in course

assessments (i.e., questions that are familiar to the students and require simple

applications of the theory as well as those that require students to synthesize, an-

alyze, and reason through unfamiliar situations) (Zoller and Tsaparlis, 1997). If

students are fully concrete or transitioning to formal thinking, they will not be

able to answer the questions that require higher-order skills (Lawson, 1973). This

illustrates the necessity for students to become formal thinkers when it is develop-

Page 28: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

2.7 What do These Assessments Measure? 12

mentally appropriate, so they are able to learn and understand the required course

materials.

These assessments are also effective tools to predict students’ academic

achievement (Lawson, 1992). It is important to point out that the context of

a particular question has been seen to play a role in assessing student reasoning

ability (Lawson, 1992). If the context of a particular question is familiar to the

student, then it is more likely to aid in his or her ability to formulate alternative

hypotheses. This idea of determining alternative hypotheses is the basis behind

scientific reasoning (Lawson, 1992). There are, however, such things as general

reasoning abilities that are not affected by content. Effective educators use the as-

sessments described above and this reasoning as a method to encourage students to

develop alternative hypotheses outside the realm of academics. These suggestions,

in turn, will challenge students to develop these skills.

Page 29: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

CHAPTER 3

Methods

3.1 Selection of CTSR

The CTSR used in this study is a thirteen item, multiple-choice assessment

(Lawson et al., 2000) and was chosen for three main reasons. First, the assess-

ment was accessible to us and we were able to give it to classroom teachers with

the understanding that students would not be given the correct answers at any

time. This would allow educators to use the CTSR for pre- and post-class analy-

ses of interventions and the measurement of student development at various stages

throughout his or her education. The assessment has other benefits as well (e.g.,

it may also allow teachers to pinpoint the specific skills that a particular class

still must develop). Secondly, the multiple choice assessment is extremely easy

to score. Finally, and most importantly, this is the most frequently used assess-

ment to measure scientific reasoning ability in the United States. As a result,

the national norms created by this study will pertain to the highest percentage

of the population when compared to any other assessment that may have been

used. To continue that trend, instead of using Lawson’s hypothesis-testing lev-

els (Lawson et al., 2000), we assigned students to reasoning levels that correspond

to Piagetian thinking stages (i.e., concrete = 0–4 and formal = 11–13). We also

included two additional categories, early transitional (5–7) and late transitional

(8–10), to more accurately reflect students’ progression from concrete to formal

thinking. These assignments were proposed to Lawson, who acknowledged that

they were acceptable and “seem to work in terms of results matching theoretical

predictions” (Lawson and Deming, 2009).

13

Page 30: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

3.2 Data Collection 14

3.2 Data Collection

Collaboration with schools and teachers to sample students occurred in two

different ways. First, instructors who have attended a Frameworks for Inquiry pro-

fessional development workshop were given the opportunity to discuss the CTSR

and its implications in the classroom as well as use the assessment in their school

(Montana Partners, 2004; Deming and Moore, 2010). We also worked with a few

teachers one-on-one in regards to uses and implications of the CTSR. These teach-

ers received the CTSR to use in their classrooms to measure students’ thinking

abilities.

The research design protocol was submitted to the Winona State Univer-

sity Institutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB ruled that the project is out-

side the realm of human subjects research as defined by the Winona State

University IRB, instead labeling it a curriculum assessment research project

(Deming and Fried, 2010). In lieu of needing IRB approval, we chose to obtain

written authorization from school administrators at each of the schools included

in this study.

After we received the required authorization, teachers used one of two methods

to submit their data. Some teachers chose to mail student answer forms to us. In

this instance, the forms may or may not have been graded upon arrival. After

grading the raw assessment form, we then entered the necessary data into an

Excel spreadsheet. Other teachers used the CTSR Data Collection Google form

to submit their students’ information (Deming and O’Donnell, 2011a); this form

may be viewed in Appendix D.2. The data submitted using this form were sent to

a Google spreadsheet and then imported to an Excel database. It should be noted

that answer sheets with an obvious pattern in the answers or less than 15 answers

selected were eliminated from this study.

Page 31: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

3.3 Subjects 15

Figure 1. Map of Schools Sampled – This figure was constructed with Googlemaps (Google, 2011). Each marker represents a school included in this study. Theschools span over 1,500 miles of the northern United States.

3.3 Subjects

The student information from this study was essentially chosen based on avail-

ability. These data were collected from thirty-five different schools in three different

states (i.e., Minnesota, Montana, and Wisconsin). The data collected are displayed

in Appendix A. Figure 1 shows the location of the different schools that were sam-

pled in this study. The image also shows the shear number of miles between the

schools that were sampled.

3.4 Composite Sketch of Schools Sampled

The full sample consisted of 6,629 (i.e., 3,447 Female, 3,118 Male) sev-

enth through twelfth grade students from various sized communities and schools

throughout the northern United States. Table 1 shows the demographic data

collected throughout the study. This table also incorporates the percentage of

Page 32: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

3.5 Data Analysis 16

students sampled at each school. For all variables, the mean, median, standard

deviation, and range are given.

Table 1. School Demographics – Summary of all data collected inthis study including city population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000), schoolenrollment, percentage of school sampled, and socioeconomic status as-sessed in Minnesota, (Minnesota Department of Education, 2010) Wis-consin, (Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, 2011) and Montana(Montana Office of Public Instruction, 2006). *The percentage of students qual-ifying for free/reduced lunch in each school was used to estimate the percentageof families living at or below 185% of the national poverty level in this study(United States Department of Agriculture, 2011), indicating socioeconomic statusof the areas sampled. The data compiled to construct this table can be viewed inAppendix C.

Mean MedianStandardDeviation

Range

City Population 58,831 4,202 143,791 320 – 596,974

School Enrollment 766 563 533 34 – 1,652

% Qualifying F/RLunch*

29.56% 24% 20.5% 8% – 88.5%

% School Sampled 30.56% 20.18% 27.21% 3.77% – 100%

3.5 Data Analysis3.5.1 Construction of Normalized Curves

Various statistical methods were used to obtain the ‘best’ estimate of the

mean and standard deviations of the CTSR distributions. The first method used

the simple mean and standard deviations, but this did not assure that growth

was occurring over time. Next, we tried a linear regression model to estimate the

average CTSR score, which ensured the assumption of continuous growth. This

method intuitively made sense, but was not the best for our situation. Our data

appears to suggest a jump in thinking skill growth between grades nine and ten.

The R2 for this model was only 0.0799, which indicates that many other variables

affect the CTSR score besides student grade level (i.e., knowing a student’s year in

school only accounts for about 8% of the total variation in CTSR scores). When

Page 33: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

3.5 Data Analysis 17

using the regression model, the predicted average CTSR score did not correlate

with the actual average CTSR score (as much as 0.8045 difference in means was

found). This is slightly disconcerting, as the categories based on Piagetian thinking

skills are as small as three points on the CTSR.

Finding this, we used cumulative density plots (Caselle and Berger, 2002;

Whitney, 1959) to create the normative curves for the CTSR score distributions.

These plots are based on the assumption that our data follow a normal or bell-

shaped distribution (Whitney, 1959). When a large number of data points were

obtained, the CTSR distributions appear approximately normal. This assumption

was verified under various conditions (e.g., grade level, student age, gender, various

teachers and schools). The strength of this assumption may not be robust against

situations with too few observations or situations where outliers may be present.

However in this study, no outliers were found and a large sample size was utilized.

We are convinced that the data do follow this trend. Only a simple mean and

standard deviation are required to construct these plots.

3.5.2 Students at Various Thinking Skill Levels

To give a different visual representation of the data collected, the data were

sorted by grade level and the percentage of students in each category was found.

This allowed for the construction of a 100% stacked graph, as shown in Figure 3.

3.5.3 Other Data

Other possible factors that may affect the students’ CTSR score (e.g., percent

qualifying for free/reduced-rate lunch, percentage per school, and gender per grade

level) were also considered. These variables were plotted against the CTSR scores

by grade level, as we have previously shown that grade level affected the score.

Page 34: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

3.5 Data Analysis 18

Socioeconomic Status

We first investigated the possible correlation between average CTSR and

socioeconomic status within each school. The National School Lunch Act was

approved by Congress in 1946 (United States Department of Agriculture, 2011).

This act made it possible for those students who could not financially af-

ford a school lunch to have one provided for them either free or at a

reduced-rate. Many amendments have been made to this act through-

out the years including the addition of a breakfast and afternoon snack.

During its first year, the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) had en-

rolled about 7 million students to receive lunches free or at a reduced

rate (United States Department of Agriculture, 2011). Currently there are over

100,000 schools and child care institutions throughout the country that are part

of the NSLP (United States Department of Agriculture, 2011). In 2009, more

than 31 million students had received their school lunches through this program

(United States Department of Agriculture, 2011). It should also be noted that

there are more students who qualify for a free or reduced-rate lunch than those who

enroll in the program. For the purpose of this study, percentage of students quali-

fying for free and reduced-rate lunches was utilized to represent the socioeconomic

status of the area from which a school draws its attendance.

Gender Analysis

When determining the best model for the grade level data in this study, we

noticed a statistically significant difference between CTSR scores for the female

and male populations sampled. In England, when Shayer and Adey investigated

the possible acceleration of cognitive development, they also noticed a significant

difference between female and male results on the General Certificate of Secondary

Education (GCSE) (Shayer and Adey, 1992; Crace, 2006). The GCSE is similar

Page 35: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

3.5 Data Analysis 19

to the ACT that many American students take to get admitted to college. This

assessment is taken during the students’ fifth year of secondary school (i.e., about

age 16) and is extremely high stakes, because if students in England do not pass the

GCSE, they cannot enter the university system (Shayer, 1999). Also, when inves-

tigating the racial academic achievement gap in science, Bacharach, Baumeister,

and Furr also found a statistical difference in achievement between females and

males in grades eight through twelve (p<0.001) (2002). During this investigation,

the researchers determined that this achievement gap emerged before secondary

school; however, the differences in achievement did not diminish during high school

(Bacharach et al., 2003). The mean, median, and standard deviation for both fe-

males and males were found for each grade level in this study, and these data were

used to explore the correlation between CTSR score and gender.

Page 36: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

CHAPTER 4

Results

4.1 Composite Sketch

The demographic data in Table 1 provides the parameters of the average school

sampled in this study; however, the ranges were provided to explicitly illustrate

that the schools represent a reasonably-diverse population. These diverse back-

grounds indicate a broad range of experiences. As a result, the students sampled

during this study were assumed to be at various developmental levels, and there-

fore represent the United States as a whole in the development of these thinking

skills national norms.

4.2 Grade Level Comparisons

The cumulative density plots constructed in this study give national percentile

rankings as a function of CTSR score to provide a national norm curve for each

grade level. These plots illustrate the expected distribution in CTSR scores under

various circumstances. They can also be used to make comparisons in CTSR

distributions across different situations as well, which can be seen in Figure 2.

The simple statistics for the grade levels (i.e., sample size, mean, and standard

deviation) are also included in this figure. Scores for various percentiles can be

found by starting at the y-axis at a particular percentile and moving across until

you find the density plot, then drop down to the x-axis from this location and this

is the CTSR Score corresponding to this percentile (e.g., for Grade 7, the 20th

percentile is about 2 and the 80th percentile is about 6).

Figure 3 converts information from these cumulative density plots into the

percent of students in each of the categories (e.g., concrete) based on the raw

CTSR score. This clearly shows that about 85% of secondary students are not

20

Page 37: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

4.2 Grade Level Comparisons 21

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

CTSRDistribu&onforGrade7Overall

n=450mean=4.00σ=2.37

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

CTSRDistribu&onforGrade8Overall

n=409mean=4.16σ=2.39

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

CTSRDistribu&onforGrade9Overall

n=1376mean=3.89σ=2.50

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

CTSRDistribu&onforGrade10Overall

n=1546mean=5.90σ=3.18

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

CTSRDistribu&onforGrade11Overall

n=2000mean=5.86σ=3.02

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

CTSRDistribu&onforGrade12Overall

n=821mean=6.60σ=3.25

Figure 2. Grade Level National Norms – Cumulative density plots for gradesseven through twelve.

Page 38: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

4.2 Grade Level Comparisons 22

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade7 Grade8 Grade9 Grade10 Grade11 Grade12

Percen

t

GradeLevel

PercentofStudentsinPiage5anStages

Concrete(0‐4) EarlyTransi@onal(5‐7) LateTransi@onal(8‐10) Formal(11‐13)

Figure 3. Students’ Grade Level Thinking Skills – Percentage of studentssampled in each Piagetian-correlated thinking stage sorted by grade level.

developing formal reasoning abilities by the time they graduate from high school.

While constructing Figures 2 and 3, we noticed the similarities between the av-

erages in grades seven through nine, grades ten and eleven, and grade twelve. The

shapes of the cumulative density plots for grades seven through nine were also very

similar to each other and yet different from the grades ten through twelve plots.

It was determined that the difference between grade levels seven through nine are

not statistically significant (p<0.1330). Similar results were found when comparing

grades ten and eleven (p<0.9330); however, grade twelve was statistically different

from both grades ten and eleven (p<0.0001). This difference is visible in Figures

2 and 3. Consequently, the data were combined into three groups, which resulted

in a much simpler comparison, shown in Figure 4. The horizontal (or vertical)

distance between these curves can provide insight in the development of secondary

Page 39: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

4.3 Socioeconomic Status and Thinking Skills 23

n=2236mean=3.96σ=2.46

n=3546mean=5.88σ=3.09

n=821mean=6.59σ=3.26

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

ComparingCTSRGradeLevelDistribu&ons

Grades7‐9

Grades10‐11

Grade12

Figure 4. Condensed National Norms – Comparison of Grades 7-9, Grades10-11, and Grade 12 average CTSR norms.

school students. For example, following the 50th percentile line across (from left

to right), we can see that the mean for grades seven through nine is 3.96, grades

ten through eleven has an mean of 5.88, and grade twelve has a mean of 6.59; a

difference of about 1.9 between the first two groups and about 0.7 between the

latter. Likewise, the vertical distance can also be compared. A CTSR score of a

6 would put a student at about the 80th percentile for students in grades seven

through nine, about the 51st percentile for students in grades ten through eleven,

and about the 43rd percentile for students in grade twelve.

4.3 Socioeconomic Status and Thinking Skills

The investigation of any correlation between the percent of students qual-

ifying for free/reduced-rate lunch at each school sampled and CTSR score

occurred with the help of Montana, (Montana Office of Public Instruction, 2006)

Page 40: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

4.3 Socioeconomic Status and Thinking Skills 24

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0‐10 11‐20 21‐30 31‐40 41‐50 51‐60 61‐70 71‐80 81‐90 91‐100

%ofS

tude

ntsQua

lifyingF/RLun

ch

F/RLunchIncrementsbySchoolsSampled

%QualifyingFree/Reduced‐RateLunch(ofschoolssampled)

Grade7 Grade8 Grade9 Grace10 Grade11 Grade12

Figure 5. Population Distribution of Free/Reduced-Rate Lunch – Per-centage of students sampled in each grade level sorted by percent qualifying forfree/reduced-rate lunch. The free/reduced-rate lunch percentage mean is 29.56%,with a median percentage of 24%, and a standard deviation of 20.5% with a samplesize of 6547 students. The following example is included to ease interpretation. Forschools with 81-90% of students qualifying for free/reduced-rate lunch (far rightcolumn), 51.5% of those students were in grade nine, while 15.1%, 22.0%, and11.4% were in grades ten, eleven, and twelve respectively.

Minnesota, (Minnesota Department of Education, 2010) and Wisconsin

(Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, 2011) Department of Educa-

tion (or Office of Public Instruction) NSLP data. These data were obtained

for each school and the schools were placed in ranges of 10% increments of

free/reduced-rate lunches. This was then plotted against the percentage of

students sampled from the schools in a 100% stacked graph format, as illustrated

in Figure 5. The data of percent qualifying for free/reduced-rate lunches for

individual grade levels can be viewed in Appendix B.

Page 41: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

4.3 Socioeconomic Status and Thinking Skills 25

y=‐0.0359x+4.8121R²=0.88299

024681012

0 20 40 60 80 100

AverageCTSRScore

PercentageFree/ReducedLunchEligibility

SeventhGradeSocioeconomicStatusEffect

y=‐0.0197x+4.6677R²=0.29052

02468

1012

0 20 40 60 80 100

AverageCTSRScore

PercentageFree/ReducedLunchEligibility

EighthGradeSocioeconomicStatusEffect

y=‐0.0475x+5.9641R²=0.71444

024681012

0 20 40 60 80 100

AverageCTSRScore

PercentageFree/ReducedLunchEligibility

NinthGradeSocioeconomicStatusEffect

y=‐0.0699x+8.3023R²=0.38256

02468

1012

0 20 40 60 80 100

AverageCTSRScore

PercentageFree/ReducedLunchEligibility

TenthGradeSocioeconomicStatusEffect

y=‐0.0497x+7.415R²=0.38467

024681012

0 20 40 60 80 100

AverageCTSRScore

PercentageFree/ReducedLunchEligibility

EleventhGradeSocioeconomicStatusEffect

y=‐0.0409x+7.7716R²=0.19778

024681012

0 20 40 60 80 100

AverageCTSRScore

PercentageFree/ReducedLunchEligibility

TwelBhGradeSocioeconomicStatusEffect

Figure 6. Correlation Between CTSR Score and Socioeconomic Status –Average CTSR score as a function of percentage of free/reduced-rate lunch quali-fication for each grade level.

The average CTSR score was found, sorted by school and grade level, and then

plotted with the percent of students qualifying for free/reduced-rate lunches for

each school. These plots are shown in Figure 6. Each data point on these graphs

represent the average CTSR score for the students sampled from a particular school

for each grade level.

Page 42: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

4.4 Gender and Thinking Skills Correlation 26

!"#

$!"#

%!"#

&!"#

'!"#

(!"#

)!"#

*!"#

+!"#

,!"#

$!!"#

!# $# %# &# '# (# )# *# +# ,# $!# $$# $%# $&#

!"#$"%&'"(

)*+,(+$-#"(

)-./0#1%2()*+,(3145#167&-%4(8#09"4(:;<:=(

-./01#23.40#$!5$%#

607./01#23.40#$!5$%#

%(>(=?=;(

."0%(>(@AB:(

C(>(=ADD(

%(>(=;?D(

."0%(>(BAEF(

C(>(?A=?(

!"#

$!"#

%!"#

&!"#

'!"#

(!"#

)!"#

*!"#

+!"#

,!"#

$!!"#

!# $# %# &# '# (# )# *# +# ,# $!# $$# $%# $&#

!"#$"%&'"(

)*+,(+$-#"(

)-./0#1%2()*+,(3145#167&-%4(8#09"4(F<D(

-./01#23.40#$!5$%#

607./01#23.40#$!5$%#

%(>(::=F(

."0%(>(?ABG(

C(>(=A?=(

%(>(:;FD(

."0%(>(EA=F(

C(>(=A@F(

Figure 7. Gender Differences in National Norms – Comparison of the averageCTSR scores for grade levels 7–9 and 10–12 for both females and males.

4.4 Gender and Thinking Skills Correlation

During the preliminary analysis of these CTSR data, we noticed an important

effect of gender on CTSR score. There appears to be a meaningful difference in

the average scores between females and males in our data. The summary of these

data is located in Table 2. The data for grade levels seven through nine were

averaged, as were the data for grade levels ten through twelve, because the means

for each gender in these groups were very similar. These condensed data were used

to make the cumulative density plots in Figure 7. From both Table 2 and Figure

7, it is noticeable that males tended to score slightly higher than the females on

the CTSR.

Page 43: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

4.4 Gender and Thinking Skills Correlation 27

Table 2. CTSR Gender Comparison – Summary of simple statistics for females,males, and all students sorted by grade level.

Grade 7 CTSR

Females Males Alln 215 235 450mean 3.66 4.33 4.01median 3 4 4σ 2.24 2.45 2.37

Grade 8 CTSR

Females Males Alln 201 208 409mean 3.82 4.49 4.16median 4 4 4σ 2.26 4.48 2.39

Grade 9 CTSR

Females Males Alln 710 650 1376mean 3.65 5.28 3.89median 3 5 4σ 2.36 2.17 2.50

Grade 10 CTSR

Females Males Alln 804 742 1546mean 5.61 6.22 5.90median 5 6 6σ 3.05 3.29 3.18

Grade 11 CTSR

Females Males Alln 1081 916 2000mean 5.44 6.38 5.86median 5 6 6σ 2.89 3.10 3.02

Grade 12 CTSR

Females Males Alln 436 381 821mean 6.08 7.18 6.60median 6 7 6σ 3.09 3.33 3.25

Page 44: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

CHAPTER 5

Discussion

5.1 Conclusions

Based on his theory of cognitive development, Piaget argued that

there are qualitative shifts that occur during thinking skill development

(Inhelder and Piaget, 1958; Piaget, 1964). The most well-known example of this is

the different stages in his theory of development (i.e. children need to pass through

the concrete operational stage before reaching the formal operational stage). He

hypothesized that reasoning would not continuously develop, but that reasoning

abilities would develop in separate, but connected, sections through a child’s ma-

turity, experience, and ability to utilize language (Piaget, 1964). These data seem

to support this hypothesis by showing a developmental shift between grades nine

and ten. This gain of 2.0 points on the CTSR corresponds to about half of a devel-

opmental stage. While these gains are promising to see at the secondary level, the

question has now become, why are these gains not larger (e.g., from the concrete

level to the formal level)?

These data do not completely corroborate the works of Piaget, who stated

that students should begin to transition to formal thinking levels between the

ages of eleven and twelve (1966). This study focused on students between twelve

and eighteen years old, and while Figure 3 illustrates there are students in all

four thinking stages in every grade level, there are over 60% of students in the

concrete stage in grades seven through nine. These students should be in either

a transitional stages or on to the formal stage of thought (Piaget, 1928). It has

been said, however, that the top 20% of the student population was included in

Piaget’s work (Crace, 2006). If this is indeed the case, then these findings do seem

to relate to Piaget’s results because the top 20% in each grade level are in either

28

Page 45: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.1 Conclusions 29

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

DevelopmentalPoten&al

Grades10‐11

Grade12

TargetGoal

Figure 8. CTSR Target Goal - Shows the current grades 7-12 average and thedevelopment potential of secondary school students based on the work of Inhelderand Piaget (Inhelder and Piaget, 1958; Piaget, 1928).

the formal thinking level or some transitional level.

It would be interesting to monitor curricular and instructional strategies over

time to determine if larger developmental shifts can be achieved between each

grade level by targeting thinking skills. It would then be reasonable to expect

more students to develop formal thinking skills before leaving high school. Ideally,

a cumulative density plot similar to the target goal in Figure 8 would be observed.

A wide array of school percentages of free or reduced-rate lunches were in-

cluded in this study not only to ensure a representative sample, but also to de-

termine if any correlation between CTSR score and school free and reduced-rate

lunch percentage. Figure 6 shows the correlations between these variables and all

six grade levels showed the overall trend: as the percentage of students qualifying

Page 46: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.1 Conclusions 30

for free or reduced-rate lunches decreased, the CTSR score increased. The smallest

R2 value that was given was about 0.20 for the grade twelve plot. This indicates

that 20% of the variance in the school’s twelfth grade average CTSR score can

be predicted by the free and reduced-rate lunch percentage for that school. This

is not to suggest that students from lower income areas are unable to develop

these reasoning skills; instead, the explanation may be from a different attribute

that typically correlates with areas of lower incomes (e.g., understaffed and under-

resourced schools that tend not to target thinking skills). These issues in low

income communities have been determined to hinder the development of students

in these areas (Hillemeier et al., 2009). The inclusion of more schools with different

qualifying free and reduced-rate lunch percentages will provide a more definitive

position regarding this matter.

The cognitive acceleration intervention completed by Shayer and Adey in Eng-

land showed gains in both females and males; however, the gains for males seemed

to be slightly larger than those for females (Shayer and Adey, 1992). Also, as pre-

viously discussed, age-related cognitive development patterns seem to be different

between females and males (Inhelder and Piaget, 1958). This indicates that when

measuring students’ abilities with any assessment, be it a Piagetian-based test or

a national standardized assessment, the data may indicate a slight difference in

scores between females and males (Shayer and Adey, 1992).

A possible correlation between CTSR score and gender was investigated

through the use of simple statistics (i.e., mean, median, and standard deviation).

This study corroborated prior research (Shayer and Adey, 1992), where male stu-

dents sampled had a mean CTSR score between 0.61 and 1.63 higher than the

female students sampled. Also, there was a consistent trend in gender differences

from grades seven through nine to grades ten through twelve (p<0.0001). As a

Page 47: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.2 Educational Implications 31

result, an average and standard deviation were found for each gender for the com-

bined grade levels of seven through nine and ten through twelve. With these data,

comparison cumulative density plots were constructed for each gender group and

grade levels. These plots show the slightly higher CTSR scores of the males over

the females sampled. Even though females start behind, the data also suggest that

they display a similar developmental jump as males between grades nine and ten.

It is important to note that females have the same developmental potential

as males. However, since females develop earlier physiologically, and since many

thinking skills interventions begin in middle school, they may be missing their

maximum benefit (Shayer and Adey, 1992). This indicates that it may not be

optimal to start thinking skill interventions in middle school. If the interventions

began a year earlier, they would be placed at the developmentally appropriate age

for females and a year early for males. No available data states that starting formal

thinking skill interventions early will adversely affect performance by males, and

it may be the only method available to close the CTSR gender gap.

5.2 Educational Implications

These data can be used in numerous ways to help educators in not only gauging

the reasoning levels of their students, but also striving for more effective and effi-

cient curricula and teaching strategies. First, an individual student’s CTSR score

may be used to determine his or her reasoning ability compared to the national

norms. If desired, educators and parents may do this for each student during each

year between grade levels seven through twelve to monitor the student’s growth

year-by-year. Next, teachers may use these data to determine the average reason-

ing ability of a class compared to that of the nation for a specific grade level, as

shown in Figure 9. This would allow teachers to modify instruction by targeting

the developmental level of each class. It is important to note that developing the

Page 48: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.2 Educational Implications 32

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Percen

&le

CTSRScore

ComparingCTSRDistribu&onsforEduca&onalImplica&ons

Period4‐SchoolXYZ

Grades10‐11Nat'lNorm

DevelopmentalPotenFal

n=22mean=3.05σ=2.26

n=3546mean=5.88σ=3.09

Figure 9. Educational Implications of CTSR - This figure illustrates how ateacher could utilize these data when comparing their individual class to the na-tional norm as well as the developmental potential. In this case, the teacher shouldfocus his or her attention on thinking skills development rather than content, atleast until students makeup their deficiencies. Thinking skills cannot be taught inabsence of content; however, the focus should be shifted in order to remediate thedeficiencies as quickly as possible.

skills discussed is different than developing knowledge. Skill development takes

time, and it is therefore unreasonable to expect teachers to make large changes

in thinking skills levels in a reasonably short time frame (e.g., one semester, one

school year).

Lastly, school districts may also use these data to compare overall grade levels

or even schools across a district. It should be pointed out that these data should

not be used as an evaluative measure of teacher performance, as these data do not

necessarily measure gains unless a pre- and post-test is performed. Obviously, a

Page 49: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.3 Future Work 33

teacher may be very effective in communicating the necessary knowledge to his

or her students, but if the students begin the school year significantly below the

thinking ability of the normative population, it would be unreasonable to expect

the students to be at or above the national average by the end of the year.

5.3 Future Work

The construction of these national norms for the Classroom Test of Scientific

Reasoning will continue for years to come. The recent discovery of more potential

data collection sites have given this project more incentive to gathering and ana-

lyzing data from not only around the United States, but also around the world.

The next step will be to accumulate data from other parts of the United States to

continually update the population for the national norms. The John C. Deming

Research Group has been given permission to distribute the assessment to edu-

cators (Lawson and Deming, 2011; Deming and O’Donnell, 2011b). The form to

request access to the CTSR may be viewed in Appendix D.1, a web address is

also provided for educators to complete the form. The distribution of the CTSR

and the continuation of this research will also allow the researchers to compare

the results of the American education system over time. Another aspect of the

future work of this study is to more effectively predict students’ thinking abilities

through the development of a more sophisticated model that combines multiple

variables (i.e., grade level, socioeconomic status, gender, school enrollment, race,

and district success rate). To construct a model of this status, possible correlations

between these variables and CTSR scores will need to be investigated.

Page 50: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

LIST OF REFERENCES

Adey, P., Robertson, A., and Venville, G. (2002). Effects of a cognitive accelerationprogramme on year 1 pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72:1–25.

Adey, P. and Shayer, M. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinkingin middle and high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(3):267–285.

Adey, P., Shayer, M., and Yates, C. (2001). Thinking Science: The Materials ofthe CASE Project. Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham, UK, 3rd edition.

Bacharach, V. R., Baumeister, A. A., and Furr, R. M. (2003). Racial and genderscience achievement gaps in secondary education. The Journal of GeneticPsychology, 164(1):115–126.

Caselle, G. and Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical Inference. Wadsworth Group,Pacific Grove, CA, 2nd edition.

Crace, J. (January 24, 2006). Children are less able than they used to be. Guardian.

Deming, J. C. and Fried, C. (April 9, 2010). IRB Approval. Personal emailcorrespondence.

Deming, J. C. and Moore, N. T. (2009). Preparing Students for STEM Majors: AThinking Skills Approach. Rochester, MN. Invited presentation at the 185th2YC3 Conference (Midwestern) and MnSCU CTL Discipline Workshop.

Deming, J. C. and Moore, N. T. (May 17-18, 2010). 7-12 Grade Workshop: UsingInquiry Approaches to Improve Student Learning. Frameworks for Inquiry.Winona, MN, [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/IArKA.

Deming, J. C. and O’Donnell, J. R. (2011a). CTSR data collection form. [Online].Available: http://goo.gl/xzKBd.

Deming, J. C. and O’Donnell, J. R. (2011b). Educator request for the ClassroomTest of Scientific Reasoning. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/xuWAk.

Endler, L. C. and Bond, T. G. (2008). Changing science outcomes: Cognitiveacceleration in a U.S. setting. Reserach in Science Education, 38:149–166.

Fuller, R. G., Karplus, R., and Lawson, A. E. (1977). Can physics develop reason-ing? Physics Today, 30:23–28.

Google (2011). Google maps. [Online]. Available: http://www.google.com/maps.

34

Page 51: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.3 Future Work 35

Hillemeier, M. M., Farkas, G., Morgan, P. L., Martin, M. A., and Maczuga, S. A.(2009). Disparities in the prevalence of cognitive delay: How early do theyappear? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 23(3):186–198.

Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking: From Child-hood to Adolescence. Basic Books, Inc, New York, 12th edition.

Iqbal, H. M. and Shayer, M. (2000). Accelerating the development of formalthinking in Pakistan secondary school students: Achievement effects andprofessional development issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(3):259–274.

Lawson, A. (1992). What do tests of ‘formal’ reasoning actually measure? Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 29(9):965–983.

Lawson, A. E. (1973). Relationship between concrete and formal operation sciencesubject matter and the intellectual level of the learner. PhD thesis, Universityof Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.

Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a Classroom Test ofFormal Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1):11–24.

Lawson, A. E. (1983). The acquisition of formal operational schemata duringadolescence: The role of the biconditional. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 20(4):347–356.

Lawson, A. E. (1985). A review of research on formal reasoning and science teach-ing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(7):569–617.

Lawson, A. E. (2002). Science Teaching and Development of Thinking. ThomsonCustom Publishing, Belmont, CA.

Lawson, A. E., Adi, H., and Karplus, R. (1979). Development of correlationalreasoning in secondary schools: Do biology courses make a difference? TheAmerican Biology Teacher, 41(7):420–425.

Lawson, A. E., Clark, B., Cramer-Meldrum, E., Falconer, K. A., Sequist, J., andKwon, Y.-J. (2000). Development of scientific reasoning in college biology:Do two levels of general hypothesis-testing skills exist? Journal of Researchin Science Teaching, 37(1):81–101.

Lawson, A. E. and Deming, J. C. (February 3, 2011). Re: CTSR collection sites.Personal email correspondence.

Lawson, A. E. and Deming, J. C. (September 21, 2009). Re: CTSR - Piagetianlevels. Personal email correspondence.

Page 52: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.3 Future Work 36

Minnesota Department of Education (2010). School report card: Stu-dent demographics. [Online]. Available: http://education.state.mn.us/ReportCard2005/index.do.

Montana Office of Public Instruction (2006). IRIS reports: School directory -free/reduced eligibility data. [Online]. Available: http://data.opi.mt.gov/IRISReports/.

Montana Partners (July 2004). High School Chemistry in Western Montana: Part-nerships to Improve the Quality of Teaching, one of the MSP projects funded2004-2005 (and subsequently renewed) by the State of Montana under ESEATitle II, Part B of the No Child Left Behind Act (GS366B070027). Missoula,MT. Frameworks for Inquiry.

Monteyne, K. and Cracolice, M. S. (2004). Development and Validation of a Web-based Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills. Vancouver, BC. NationalAssociation for Research in Science Teaching.

Piaget, J. (1928). Judgment and Reasoning in the Child. Number 205 in The Inter-national Library of Psychology Philosophy and Scientific Method. Littlefield,Adams and Co., Totowa, NJ, reprinted edition.

Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget developmentand learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3):176–186.

Raodrangka, V. (1991). The construction of a Group Assessment of Logical Think-ing (GALT). Kasetsart Journal: Social Sciences, 12(2):148–154.

Shayer, M. (1999). Cognitive acceleration through science education ii: Cognitiveacceleration through science education II: Its effects and scope. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 21(8):883–902.

Shayer, M. and Adey, P. (1992). Accelerating the development of formal thinkingin middle and high school students III: Testing the permanency of effects.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10):1101–1115.

Shayer, M., Adey, P., and Wylam, H. (1981). Group tests of cognitive development:Ideals and a realization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(2):157–168.

Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Allyn andBacon, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 9th edition.

Tobin, K. G. and Capie, W. (1981). The development and validation of a group Testof Logical Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(2):413–423.

Page 53: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

5.3 Future Work 37

United States Department of Agriculture (2011). National school lunch program.[Online]. Available: http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/lunch/.

U.S. Census Bureau (2000). State and county quick facts. [Online]. Available:http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/.

Wagner, T. (2008). The Global Achievement Gap. Basic Books, Inc, New York.

Whitney, D. R. (1959). Elements of Mathematical Statistics. Henry Holt andCompany, Inc., New York, NY.

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (2011). Program statistics: Wisconsinschool free/reduced eligibility data. [Online]. Available: http://dpi.state.wi.us/fns/progstat.html.

Zoller, U. and Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: Thecase of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27(1):117–130.

Page 54: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A

CTSR Data

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,099 54 30J 6/20/1997 11/8/2010 13.4 0 7 01,100 54 30J 4/15/1997 11/8/2010 13.6 1 7 03,663 17 30K 12/30/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 0 7 03,664 17 30K 1/26/1996 4/7/2010 14.2 1 7 03,665 17 30K 3/6/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 1 7 04,311 38 32D 10/23/1996 3/22/2010 13.4 0 7 04,312 38 32D 4/9/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 0 7 05,331 13 32F 8/30/1996 3/30/2010 13.6 0 7 05,332 13 32F 4/9/1997 3/30/2010 13.0 0 7 05,333 13 32F 5/12/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 1 7 05,935 26 32K 7/2/1996 4/29/2010 13.8 0 7 05,936 26 32K 8/15/1996 4/29/2010 13.7 1 7 05,937 53 32K 7/2/1996 4/29/2010 13.8 0 7 01,101 54 30J 5/24/1998 11/8/2010 12.5 0 7 11,102 54 30J 7/24/1998 11/8/2010 12.3 0 7 11,103 54 30J 10/10/1995 11/8/2010 15.1 1 7 11,104 54 30J 2/2/1998 11/8/2010 12.8 1 7 11,292 9 32E 4/14/1997 3/30/2010 13.0 1 7 13,666 17 30K 5/9/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 0 7 13,667 17 30K 7/10/1997 4/7/2010 12.7 0 7 13,668 17 30K 5/8/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 0 7 13,669 17 30K 7/31/1997 4/7/2010 12.7 0 7 13,670 17 30K 4/7/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 0 7 13,671 17 30K 10/26/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 0 7 13,672 17 30K 2/11/1996 4/7/2010 14.2 1 7 13,673 17 30K 1/6/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 13,674 17 30K 1/15/1996 4/7/2010 14.2 1 7 14,313 38 32D 9/25/1996 3/22/2010 13.5 0 7 14,314 38 32D 2/23/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 0 7 14,315 38 32D 4/13/1997 3/22/2010 12.9 1 7 14,316 38 32D 8/7/1996 3/22/2010 13.6 1 7 15,334 13 32F 3/29/1997 3/30/2010 13.0 0 7 15,335 13 32F 3/4/1997 3/30/2010 13.1 0 7 15,336 13 32F 3/29/1997 3/30/2010 13.0 0 7 15,337 13 32F 2/4/1997 3/30/2010 13.1 0 7 15,338 13 32F 1/8/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 0 7 15,339 13 32F 9/11/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 15,340 13 32F 7/17/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 1 7 15,341 13 32F 7/8/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 1 7 15,342 13 32F 5/19/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 1 7 15,636 18 30D 2/10/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 0 7 15,637 18 30D 3/19/1997 4/30/2010 13.1 0 7 15,638 18 30D 3/20/1997 4/30/2010 13.1 0 7 15,639 18 30D 1/25/1997 4/30/2010 13.3 0 7 15,640 18 30D 2/10/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 7 15,641 18 30D 3/4/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 1 7 15,642 18 30D 12/27/1996 4/30/2010 13.3 1 7 15,643 18 30D 10/14/1996 4/30/2010 13.5 1 7 15,644 18 30D 7/6/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 1 7 15,645 18 30D 11/28/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 1 7 1

38

Page 55: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 39

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,938 26 32K 2/20/1997 4/29/2010 13.2 0 7 15,939 26 32K 7/29/1997 4/29/2010 12.8 0 7 15,940 26 32K 4/27/1996 4/29/2010 14.0 0 7 15,941 26 32K 6/13/1997 4/29/2010 12.9 0 7 15,942 26 32K 6/17/1997 4/29/2010 12.9 0 7 15,943 26 32K 6/11/1997 4/29/2010 12.9 0 7 15,944 26 32K 12/23/1996 4/29/2010 13.3 1 7 15,945 26 32K 2/6/1997 4/29/2010 13.2 1 7 15,946 53 32K 4/25/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 0 7 15,947 53 32K 1/6/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 0 7 15,948 53 32K 1/19/1996 4/29/2010 14.3 0 7 15,949 53 32K 10/22/1996 4/29/2010 13.5 1 7 15,950 53 32K 8/22/1997 4/29/2010 12.7 1 7 15,951 53 32K 3/5/1997 4/29/2010 13.1 1 7 15,952 53 32K 6/19/1997 4/29/2010 12.9 1 7 15,953 53 32K 8/21/1996 4/29/2010 13.7 1 7 15,954 53 32K 1/23/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 1 7 11,105 54 30J 11/4/1996 11/8/2010 14.0 0 7 21,106 54 30J 4/15/1997 11/8/2010 13.6 0 7 21,107 54 30J 11/3/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 0 7 21,108 54 30J 6/10/1998 11/8/2010 12.4 0 7 21,109 54 30J 10/10/1997 11/8/2010 13.1 0 7 21,110 54 30J 9/15/1997 11/8/2010 13.1 0 7 21,111 54 30J 11/11/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 0 7 21,112 54 30J 5/5/1998 11/8/2010 12.5 1 7 21,113 54 30J 1/20/1998 11/8/2010 12.8 1 7 21,114 54 30J 6/28/1998 11/8/2010 12.4 1 7 21,115 54 30J 7/26/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 1 7 21,293 9 32E 8/3/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 0 7 21,294 9 32E 2/27/1997 3/30/2010 13.1 1 7 23,675 17 30K 10/30/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 0 7 23,676 17 30K 9/17/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 0 7 23,677 17 30K 2/3/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 0 7 23,678 17 30K 8/18/1997 4/7/2010 12.6 0 7 23,679 17 30K 4/17/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 0 7 23,680 17 30K 4/27/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 0 7 23,681 17 30K 9/16/1997 4/7/2010 12.6 0 7 23,682 17 30K 10/19/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 0 7 23,683 17 30K 4/24/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 1 7 23,684 17 30K 11/13/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 7 23,685 17 30K 1/16/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 7 24,317 38 32D 4/16/1997 3/22/2010 12.9 0 7 24,318 38 32D 6/25/1997 3/22/2010 12.7 0 7 24,319 38 32D 9/2/1996 3/22/2010 13.5 0 7 24,320 38 32D 12/5/1996 3/22/2010 13.3 0 7 24,321 38 32D 8/20/1997 3/22/2010 12.6 1 7 24,322 38 32D 6/21/1997 3/22/2010 12.8 1 7 24,323 38 32D 2/6/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 1 7 24,324 38 32D 12/14/1996 3/22/2010 13.3 1 7 25,343 13 32F 5/24/1996 3/30/2010 13.8 0 7 2

Page 56: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 40

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,344 13 32F 11/24/1996 3/30/2010 13.3 0 7 25,345 13 32F 5/16/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 0 7 25,346 13 32F 11/8/1997 3/30/2010 12.4 0 7 25,347 13 32F 6/6/1997 3/30/2010 12.8 0 7 25,348 13 32F 5/6/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 0 7 25,349 13 32F 5/2/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 0 7 25,350 13 32F 8/16/1997 3/30/2010 12.6 0 7 25,351 13 32F 9/9/1996 3/30/2010 13.6 1 7 25,352 13 32F 10/31/1996 3/30/2010 13.4 1 7 25,353 13 32F 9/24/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 1 7 25,354 13 32F 6/2/1997 3/30/2010 12.8 1 7 25,355 13 32F 4/25/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 1 7 25,646 18 30D 1/17/1997 4/30/2010 13.3 0 7 25,647 18 30D 5/13/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 0 7 25,648 18 30D 5/14/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 0 7 25,649 18 30D 10/10/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 0 7 25,650 18 30D 6/1/1997 4/30/2010 12.9 0 7 25,651 18 30D 8/27/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 7 25,652 18 30D 10/2/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 0 7 25,653 18 30D 9/2/1997 4/30/2010 12.7 1 7 25,654 18 30D 11/27/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 1 7 25,655 18 30D 11/18/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 1 7 25,656 18 30D 9/2/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 1 7 25,657 18 30D 5/14/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 1 7 25,658 18 30D 2/11/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 1 7 25,659 18 30D 11/1/1996 4/30/2010 13.5 1 7 25,660 18 30D 11/22/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 1 7 25,661 18 30D 12/21/1997 4/30/2010 12.4 1 7 25,955 26 32K 6/21/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 0 7 25,956 26 32K 1/22/1996 4/29/2010 14.3 0 7 25,957 26 32K 11/15/1996 4/29/2010 13.5 0 7 25,958 26 32K 5/11/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 0 7 25,959 26 32K 1/15/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 0 7 25,960 26 32K 1/14/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 1 7 25,961 53 32K 8/17/1996 4/29/2010 13.7 0 7 25,962 53 32K 4/14/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 0 7 25,963 53 32K 11/21/1996 4/29/2010 13.4 1 7 25,964 53 32K 9/16/1996 4/29/2010 13.6 1 7 25,965 53 32K 3/3/1997 4/29/2010 13.2 1 7 25,966 53 32K 11/22/1996 4/29/2010 13.4 1 7 21,116 54 30J 2/16/1998 11/8/2010 12.7 0 7 31,117 54 30J 10/26/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 0 7 31,118 54 30J 1/29/1998 11/8/2010 12.8 1 7 31,119 54 30J 4/15/1998 11/8/2010 12.6 1 7 31,120 54 30J 4/6/1998 11/8/2010 12.6 1 7 31,295 9 32E 8/30/1996 3/30/2010 13.6 0 7 31,296 9 32E 7/28/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 0 7 33,686 17 30K 9/24/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 0 7 33,687 17 30K 3/23/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 0 7 33,688 17 30K 7/23/1997 4/7/2010 12.7 0 7 3

Page 57: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 41

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,689 17 30K 5/19/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 0 7 33,690 17 30K 11/24/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 0 7 33,691 17 30K 8/21/1997 4/7/2010 12.6 0 7 33,692 17 30K 4/15/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 1 7 33,693 17 30K 11/19/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 1 7 33,694 17 30K 5/21/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 1 7 33,695 17 30K 6/30/1997 4/7/2010 12.8 1 7 33,696 17 30K 4/18/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 1 7 33,697 17 30K 1/9/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 33,698 17 30K 6/13/1997 4/7/2010 12.8 7 33,699 17 30K 6/11/1997 4/7/2010 12.8 7 34,325 38 32D 9/27/1996 3/22/2010 13.5 0 7 34,326 38 32D 6/11/1997 3/22/2010 12.8 0 7 34,327 38 32D 3/31/1997 3/22/2010 13.0 1 7 34,328 38 32D 9/25/1996 3/22/2010 13.5 1 7 34,329 38 32D 10/25/1996 3/22/2010 13.4 1 7 35,356 13 32F 3/19/1997 3/30/2010 13.0 0 7 35,357 13 32F 3/11/1997 3/30/2010 13.1 0 7 35,358 13 32F 1/17/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 0 7 35,359 13 32F 9/12/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 35,360 13 32F 4/29/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 0 7 35,361 13 32F 5/17/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 0 7 35,362 13 32F 5/12/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 0 7 35,363 13 32F 6/5/1997 3/30/2010 12.8 1 7 35,364 13 32F 6/26/1997 3/30/2010 12.8 1 7 35,365 13 32F 5/26/1997 3/30/2010 12.8 1 7 35,366 13 32F 11/5/1996 3/30/2010 13.4 1 7 35,367 13 32F 5/15/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 1 7 35,368 13 32F 1/21/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 1 7 35,369 13 32F 8/22/1997 3/30/2010 12.6 1 7 35,662 18 30D 2/26/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 0 7 35,663 18 30D 12/10/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 0 7 35,664 18 30D 3/14/1997 4/30/2010 13.1 0 7 35,665 18 30D 3/4/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 0 7 35,666 18 30D 10/8/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 0 7 35,667 18 30D 9/4/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 7 35,668 18 30D 10/8/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 0 7 35,669 18 30D 3/7/1997 4/30/2010 13.1 1 7 35,670 18 30D 1/19/1997 4/30/2010 13.3 1 7 35,671 18 30D 6/26/1997 4/30/2010 12.8 1 7 35,672 18 30D 9/6/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 1 7 35,673 18 30D 1/20/1997 4/30/2010 13.3 1 7 35,674 18 30D 2/22/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 1 7 35,967 26 32K 5/9/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 0 7 35,968 26 32K 8/27/1996 4/29/2010 13.7 0 7 35,969 26 32K 2/10/1997 4/29/2010 13.2 0 7 35,970 26 32K 12/1/1996 4/29/2010 13.4 1 7 35,971 26 32K 11/21/1996 4/29/2010 13.4 1 7 35,972 26 32K 12/3/1996 4/29/2010 13.4 1 7 35,973 53 32K 11/23/1996 4/29/2010 13.4 1 7 3

Page 58: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 42

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,974 53 32K 6/2/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 7 35,975 53 32K 3/25/1996 4/29/2010 14.1 1 7 31,121 54 30J 7/19/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 1 7 41,122 54 30J 4/24/1997 11/8/2010 13.5 1 7 41,123 54 30J 5/5/1997 11/8/2010 13.5 1 7 41,124 54 30J 10/27/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 1 7 41,125 54 30J 4/14/1997 11/8/2010 13.6 1 7 41,126 54 30J 8/3/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 1 7 41,127 54 30J 3/2/1997 11/8/2010 13.7 1 7 41,297 9 32E 9/3/1995 3/30/2010 14.6 1 7 43,700 17 30K 2/18/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 0 7 43,701 17 30K 2/14/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 0 7 43,702 17 30K 6/5/1997 4/7/2010 12.8 0 7 43,703 17 30K 1/2/1997 4/7/2010 13.3 0 7 43,704 17 30K 11/23/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 0 7 43,705 17 30K 9/23/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 0 7 43,706 17 30K 8/13/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 0 7 43,707 17 30K 1/9/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 0 7 43,708 17 30K 4/13/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 0 7 43,709 17 30K 5/30/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 0 7 43,710 17 30K 12/30/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 0 7 43,711 17 30K 10/23/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 0 7 43,712 17 30K 9/5/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 1 7 43,713 17 30K 8/28/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 1 7 43,714 17 30K 9/18/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 1 7 43,715 17 30K 1/24/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 43,716 17 30K 12/10/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 1 7 43,717 17 30K 7/17/1996 4/7/2010 13.7 1 7 44,330 38 32D 3/9/1997 3/22/2010 13.0 0 7 44,331 38 32D 6/2/1997 3/22/2010 12.8 1 7 44,332 38 32D 8/5/1997 3/22/2010 12.6 1 7 44,333 38 32D 6/11/1996 3/22/2010 13.8 1 7 45,370 13 32F 9/25/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 45,371 13 32F 11/25/1996 3/30/2010 13.3 0 7 45,372 13 32F 1/21/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 0 7 45,373 13 32F 10/4/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 45,374 13 32F 1/12/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 0 7 45,375 13 32F 7/7/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 1 7 45,376 13 32F 11/9/1996 3/30/2010 13.4 1 7 45,377 13 32F 10/29/1996 3/30/2010 13.4 1 7 45,675 18 30D 4/15/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 0 7 45,676 18 30D 1/19/1997 4/30/2010 13.3 0 7 45,677 18 30D 4/17/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 0 7 45,678 18 30D 2/10/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 0 7 45,679 18 30D 3/1/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 0 7 45,680 18 30D 4/3/1997 4/30/2010 13.1 0 7 45,681 18 30D 2/1/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 0 7 45,682 18 30D 8/31/1997 4/30/2010 12.7 0 7 45,683 18 30D 6/1/1997 4/30/2010 12.9 0 7 45,684 18 30D 6/2/1997 4/30/2010 12.9 0 7 4

Page 59: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 43

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,685 18 30D 8/27/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 7 45,686 18 30D 1/13/1997 4/30/2010 13.3 0 7 45,687 18 30D 8/13/1997 4/30/2010 12.7 0 7 45,688 18 30D 8/4/1997 4/30/2010 12.7 1 7 45,689 18 30D 9/8/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 1 7 45,690 18 30D 2/19/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 1 7 45,691 18 30D 11/10/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 7 45,692 18 30D 5/12/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 1 7 45,693 18 30D 12/9/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 1 7 45,694 18 30D 9/6/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 1 7 45,695 18 30D 8/26/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 1 7 45,976 26 32K 4/17/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 0 7 45,977 26 32K 5/4/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 0 7 45,978 26 32K 3/20/1997 4/29/2010 13.1 0 7 45,979 26 32K 1/11/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 0 7 45,980 26 32K 1/18/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 0 7 45,981 26 32K 2/21/1997 4/29/2010 13.2 1 7 45,982 26 32K 2/20/1996 4/29/2010 14.2 1 7 45,983 26 32K 10/28/1996 4/29/2010 13.5 1 7 45,984 26 32K 12/28/1995 4/29/2010 14.3 1 7 45,985 26 32K 9/16/1996 4/29/2010 13.6 1 7 45,986 53 32K 2/6/1996 4/29/2010 14.2 1 7 45,987 53 32K 7/20/1997 4/29/2010 12.8 1 7 41,128 54 30J 4/24/1998 11/8/2010 12.5 0 7 51,129 54 30J 3/27/1998 11/8/2010 12.6 0 7 51,130 54 30J 11/8/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 1 7 51,131 54 30J 12/1/1997 11/8/2010 12.9 1 7 51,132 54 30J 4/7/1998 11/8/2010 12.6 1 7 51,133 54 30J 9/11/1997 11/8/2010 13.2 1 7 51,134 54 30J 11/8/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 1 7 51,135 54 30J 8/19/1997 11/8/2010 13.2 1 7 51,136 54 30J 6/28/1998 11/8/2010 12.4 1 7 51,137 54 30J 7/17/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 1 7 51,138 54 30J 1/17/1998 11/8/2010 12.8 1 7 53,718 17 30K 2/3/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 0 7 53,719 17 30K 1/10/1996 4/7/2010 14.2 0 7 53,720 17 30K 12/3/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 0 7 53,721 17 30K 2/25/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 0 7 53,722 17 30K 10/7/1997 4/7/2010 12.5 0 7 53,723 17 30K 1/2/1997 4/7/2010 13.3 0 7 53,724 17 30K 11/17/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 0 7 53,725 17 30K 2/16/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 1 7 53,726 17 30K 9/11/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 1 7 53,727 17 30K 4/1/1996 4/7/2010 14.0 1 7 53,728 17 30K 2/3/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 53,729 17 30K 5/31/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 1 7 53,730 17 30K 2/2/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 53,731 17 30K 10/9/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 1 7 53,732 17 30K 9/18/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 1 7 53,733 17 30K 12/1/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 1 7 5

Page 60: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 44

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,734 17 30K 2/9/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 53,735 17 30K 3/18/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 7 53,736 17 30K 10/11/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 7 54,334 38 32D 11/4/1996 3/22/2010 13.4 0 7 54,335 38 32D 7/22/1997 3/22/2010 12.7 0 7 54,336 38 32D 3/2/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 0 7 54,337 38 32D 12/3/1996 3/22/2010 13.3 0 7 54,338 38 32D 3/10/1997 3/22/2010 13.0 0 7 54,339 38 32D 5/6/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 1 7 54,340 38 32D 3/3/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 1 7 54,341 38 32D 12/10/1996 3/22/2010 13.3 1 7 55,378 13 32F 1/11/1996 3/30/2010 14.2 0 7 55,379 13 32F 6/20/1997 3/30/2010 12.8 0 7 55,380 13 32F 12/19/1996 3/30/2010 13.3 0 7 55,381 13 32F 11/7/1996 3/30/2010 13.4 1 7 55,382 13 32F 12/25/1996 3/30/2010 13.3 1 7 55,383 13 32F 3/27/1997 3/30/2010 13.0 1 7 55,384 13 32F 4/29/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 1 7 55,385 13 32F 7/24/1996 3/30/2010 13.7 1 7 55,386 13 32F 12/18/1996 3/30/2010 13.3 1 7 55,387 13 32F 7/23/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 1 7 55,696 18 30D 4/15/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 0 7 55,697 18 30D 9/9/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 0 7 55,698 18 30D 6/6/1997 4/30/2010 12.9 0 7 55,699 18 30D 5/10/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 0 7 55,700 18 30D 6/28/1997 4/30/2010 12.8 0 7 55,701 18 30D 1/12/1997 4/30/2010 13.3 1 7 55,702 18 30D 7/26/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 1 7 55,703 18 30D 3/19/1997 4/30/2010 13.1 1 7 55,704 18 30D 3/19/1998 4/30/2010 12.1 1 7 55,705 18 30D 12/1/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 1 7 55,706 18 30D 5/18/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 7 55,707 18 30D 8/12/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 1 7 55,988 26 32K 9/2/1996 4/29/2010 13.7 0 7 55,989 26 32K 4/1/1997 4/29/2010 13.1 0 7 55,990 26 32K 4/14/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 0 7 55,991 26 32K 11/6/1996 4/29/2010 13.5 1 7 55,992 26 32K 1/10/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 1 7 55,993 26 32K 6/17/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 7 55,994 26 32K 3/28/1997 4/29/2010 13.1 1 7 55,995 26 32K 5/26/1997 4/29/2010 12.9 1 7 51,139 54 30J 6/10/1998 11/8/2010 12.4 1 7 61,298 9 32E 7/30/1996 3/30/2010 13.7 1 7 63,737 17 30K 3/5/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 0 7 63,738 17 30K 5/5/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 0 7 63,739 17 30K 10/16/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 0 7 63,740 17 30K 3/2/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 0 7 63,741 17 30K 1/26/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 0 7 63,742 17 30K 8/24/1997 4/7/2010 12.6 0 7 63,743 17 30K 11/12/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 1 7 6

Page 61: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 45

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,744 17 30K 11/19/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 1 7 63,745 17 30K 6/23/1997 4/7/2010 12.8 1 7 63,746 17 30K 9/26/1996 4/7/2010 13.5 1 7 63,747 17 30K 5/11/1996 4/7/2010 13.9 1 7 63,748 17 30K 12/25/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 1 7 63,749 17 30K 11/12/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 1 7 63,750 17 30K 8/21/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 1 7 63,751 17 30K 8/6/1997 4/7/2010 12.7 1 7 63,752 17 30K 2/10/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 63,753 17 30K 3/31/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 1 7 64,342 38 32D 2/19/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 0 7 64,343 38 32D 2/23/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 0 7 64,344 38 32D 12/23/1996 3/22/2010 13.2 1 7 64,345 38 32D 2/4/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 1 7 65,388 13 32F 6/30/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 0 7 65,389 13 32F 5/19/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 0 7 65,390 13 32F 11/29/1996 3/30/2010 13.3 0 7 65,391 13 32F 9/12/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 65,392 13 32F 10/8/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 65,393 13 32F 10/12/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 65,394 13 32F 3/28/1997 3/30/2010 13.0 1 7 65,708 18 30D 8/8/1997 4/30/2010 12.7 0 7 65,709 18 30D 10/18/1996 4/30/2010 13.5 0 7 65,710 18 30D 3/3/1997 4/30/2010 13.2 1 7 65,711 18 30D 5/8/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 1 7 65,712 18 30D 7/7/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 1 7 65,713 18 30D 12/30/1996 4/30/2010 13.3 1 7 65,996 26 32K 7/31/1996 4/29/2010 13.7 0 7 65,997 26 32K 11/25/1996 4/29/2010 13.4 0 7 65,998 26 32K 8/19/1997 4/29/2010 12.7 1 7 65,999 26 32K 5/2/1997 4/29/2010 13.0 1 7 66,000 53 32K 10/16/1996 4/29/2010 13.5 0 7 673 30 30B 8/19/1994 3/24/2010 15.6 1 7 71,140 54 30J 6/18/1998 11/8/2010 12.4 1 7 71,141 54 30J 11/6/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 1 7 73,754 17 30K 3/18/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 0 7 73,755 17 30K 5/16/1997 4/7/2010 12.9 0 7 73,756 17 30K 9/11/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 0 7 73,757 17 30K 6/25/1996 4/7/2010 13.8 0 7 73,758 17 30K 8/11/1997 4/7/2010 12.7 0 7 73,759 17 30K 2/5/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 73,760 17 30K 7/19/1996 4/7/2010 13.7 1 7 73,761 17 30K 7/7/1996 4/7/2010 13.7 1 7 73,762 17 30K 4/19/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 1 7 73,763 17 30K 3/15/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 1 7 73,764 17 30K 10/29/1996 4/7/2010 13.4 1 7 73,765 17 30K 9/8/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 1 7 73,766 17 30K 8/6/1996 4/7/2010 13.7 1 7 74,346 38 32D 4/3/1997 3/22/2010 13.0 0 7 74,347 38 32D 11/20/1996 3/22/2010 13.3 1 7 7

Page 62: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 46

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,395 13 32F 1/31/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 0 7 75,396 13 32F 2/6/1997 3/30/2010 13.1 0 7 75,397 13 32F 7/4/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 1 7 75,398 13 32F 2/16/1997 3/30/2010 13.1 1 7 75,399 13 32F 5/21/1997 3/30/2010 12.9 1 7 75,400 13 32F 1/30/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 1 7 75,714 18 30D 10/13/1996 4/30/2010 13.5 0 7 75,715 18 30D 9/24/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 0 7 75,716 18 30D 9/20/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 0 7 75,717 18 30D 11/26/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 0 7 75,718 18 30D 6/19/1997 4/30/2010 12.9 1 7 75,719 18 30D 10/28/1996 4/30/2010 13.5 1 7 76,001 26 32K 1/26/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 0 7 76,002 26 32K 1/16/1997 4/29/2010 13.3 0 7 71,142 54 30J 12/4/1997 11/8/2010 12.9 0 7 81,143 54 30J 12/18/1997 11/8/2010 12.9 0 7 81,144 54 30J 5/7/1998 11/8/2010 12.5 1 7 81,145 54 30J 5/12/1998 11/8/2010 12.5 1 7 83,767 17 30K 12/13/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 0 7 83,768 17 30K 2/27/1997 4/7/2010 13.1 0 7 83,769 17 30K 12/18/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 1 7 83,770 17 30K 7/3/1997 4/7/2010 12.8 1 7 83,771 17 30K 7/24/1997 4/7/2010 12.7 1 7 83,772 17 30K 8/13/1996 4/7/2010 13.6 1 7 83,773 17 30K 7/30/1997 4/7/2010 12.7 1 7 84,348 38 32D 2/26/1997 3/22/2010 13.1 1 7 85,401 13 32F 3/8/1992 3/30/2010 18.1 0 7 85,402 13 32F 7/26/1996 3/30/2010 13.7 1 7 85,403 13 32F 1/28/1997 3/30/2010 13.2 1 7 85,720 18 30D 7/21/1997 4/30/2010 12.8 0 7 85,721 18 30D 9/22/1997 4/30/2010 12.6 0 7 85,722 18 30D 5/6/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 7 86,003 26 32K 11/5/1996 4/29/2010 13.5 0 7 81,146 54 30J 11/13/1997 11/8/2010 13.0 1 7 93,774 17 30K 12/16/1996 4/7/2010 13.3 1 7 94,349 38 32D 8/12/1996 3/22/2010 13.6 1 7 95,404 13 32F 11/16/1996 3/30/2010 13.4 0 7 95,405 13 32F 11/5/1996 3/30/2010 13.4 1 7 95,723 18 30D 10/14/1996 4/30/2010 13.5 0 7 93,775 17 30K 1/11/1997 4/7/2010 13.2 1 7 104,350 38 32D 8/16/1996 3/22/2010 13.6 1 7 105,406 13 32F 9/20/1996 3/30/2010 13.5 0 7 105,407 13 32F 12/10/1996 3/30/2010 13.3 1 7 105,408 13 32F 6/18/1997 3/30/2010 12.8 1 7 105,724 18 30D 10/3/1996 4/30/2010 13.6 1 7 103,776 17 30K 3/25/1997 4/7/2010 13.0 1 7 115,409 13 32F 7/18/1997 3/30/2010 12.7 1 7 115,410 13 32F 8/18/1997 3/30/2010 12.6 0 7 126,004 26 32K 6/7/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 7 126,005 26 32K 11/9/1996 4/29/2010 13.5 1 7 12

Page 63: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 47

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,147 54 30J 7/18/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 0 8 01,299 9 32E 11/28/1995 3/30/2010 14.3 0 8 01,300 9 32E 10/28/1995 3/30/2010 14.4 0 8 04,351 20 32D 7/25/1995 3/22/2010 14.7 0 8 05,217 6 32I 10/4/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 05,218 6 32I 3/18/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 05,219 6 32I 9/27/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 05,220 6 32I 6/16/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 05,221 6 32I 11/10/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 06,006 26 32K 5/12/1996 4/29/2010 14.0 0 8 06,007 26 32K 5/22/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 8 06,008 26 32K 10/3/1995 4/29/2010 14.6 1 8 01,148 54 30J 4/14/1997 11/8/2010 13.6 0 8 11,149 54 30J 8/26/1996 11/8/2010 14.2 0 8 11,150 54 30J 12/30/1996 11/8/2010 13.9 0 8 11,151 54 30J 10/7/1996 11/8/2010 14.1 1 8 11,152 54 30J 7/18/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 1 8 11,153 54 30J 4/7/1996 11/8/2010 14.6 1 8 11,154 54 30J 2/2/1997 11/8/2010 13.8 1 8 11,155 54 30J 2/2/1996 11/8/2010 14.8 1 8 11,301 9 32E 5/2/1996 3/30/2010 13.9 0 8 14,352 20 32D 8/14/1995 3/22/2010 14.6 0 8 14,353 20 32D 5/11/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 0 8 14,354 20 32D 5/6/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 0 8 14,355 20 32D 1/7/1996 3/22/2010 14.2 0 8 14,356 20 32D 7/9/1996 3/22/2010 13.7 1 8 14,357 20 32D 10/23/1995 3/22/2010 14.4 1 8 14,358 20 32D 11/27/1994 3/22/2010 15.3 1 8 15,222 6 32I 3/6/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 15,223 6 32I 7/1/1995 4/30/2010 14.8 0 8 15,224 6 32I 12/30/1995 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 15,225 6 32I 7/16/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 0 8 15,226 6 32I 12/31/1995 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 15,227 6 32I 9/28/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 1 8 15,228 6 32I 3/27/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 15,229 6 32I 12/7/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 8 15,725 18 30D 7/2/1995 4/30/2010 14.8 0 8 15,726 18 30D 1/11/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 15,727 18 30D 8/23/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 8 15,728 18 30D 8/22/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 8 15,729 18 30D 2/26/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 15,730 18 30D 6/11/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 15,731 18 30D 12/13/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 16,009 26 32K 1/31/1995 4/29/2010 15.2 0 8 16,010 26 32K 7/17/1996 4/29/2010 13.8 0 8 16,011 26 32K 12/2/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 0 8 16,012 26 32K 10/27/1995 4/29/2010 14.5 0 8 16,013 26 32K 10/31/1995 4/29/2010 14.5 0 8 16,014 26 32K 8/10/1995 4/29/2010 14.7 1 8 16,015 26 32K 5/21/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 8 1

Page 64: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 48

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,016 26 32K 12/4/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 16,017 26 32K 6/2/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 8 16,018 26 32K 3/3/1996 4/29/2010 14.2 1 8 11,156 54 30J 12/2/1996 11/8/2010 13.9 0 8 21,157 54 30J 3/26/1997 11/8/2010 13.6 0 8 21,158 54 30J 7/22/1996 11/8/2010 14.3 1 8 21,302 9 32E 5/11/1996 3/30/2010 13.9 1 8 24,359 20 32D 11/18/1995 3/22/2010 14.3 0 8 24,360 20 32D 11/30/1995 3/22/2010 14.3 1 8 24,361 20 32D 10/12/1995 3/22/2010 14.4 1 8 25,230 6 32I 10/12/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 25,231 6 32I 1/25/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 25,232 6 32I 4/1/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 25,233 6 32I 12/1/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 25,234 6 32I 5/6/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 25,235 6 32I 8/22/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 0 8 25,236 6 32I 1/24/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 25,237 6 32I 3/30/1995 4/30/2010 15.1 1 8 25,238 6 32I 6/3/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 25,239 6 32I 2/25/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 25,240 6 32I 8/27/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 1 8 25,241 6 32I 8/10/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 1 8 25,242 6 32I 3/28/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 25,243 6 32I 3/15/1995 4/30/2010 15.1 1 8 25,244 6 32I 10/16/1994 4/30/2010 15.5 1 8 25,732 18 30D 4/22/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 25,733 18 30D 2/5/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 25,734 18 30D 1/31/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 25,735 18 30D 8/21/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 0 8 25,736 18 30D 11/25/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 25,737 18 30D 11/3/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 25,738 18 30D 5/11/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 25,739 18 30D 6/14/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 25,740 18 30D 2/25/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 25,741 18 30D 5/21/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 25,742 18 30D 10/1/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 1 8 25,743 18 30D 2/17/1995 4/30/2010 15.2 1 8 25,744 18 30D 9/29/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 1 8 25,745 18 30D 8/19/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 8 26,019 26 32K 5/27/1994 4/29/2010 15.9 0 8 26,020 26 32K 8/29/1995 4/29/2010 14.7 0 8 26,021 26 32K 5/23/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 0 8 26,022 26 32K 3/27/1996 4/29/2010 14.1 0 8 26,023 26 32K 11/7/1995 4/29/2010 14.5 0 8 26,024 26 32K 10/17/1995 4/29/2010 14.5 0 8 26,025 26 32K 7/5/1996 4/29/2010 13.8 0 8 26,026 26 32K 5/11/1995 4/29/2010 15.0 0 8 26,027 26 32K 1/17/1995 4/29/2010 15.3 0 8 26,028 26 32K 2/23/1996 4/29/2010 14.2 1 8 26,029 26 32K 8/27/1995 4/29/2010 14.7 1 8 2

Page 65: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 49

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,030 26 32K 1/2/1996 4/29/2010 14.3 1 8 26,031 26 32K 12/28/1995 4/29/2010 14.3 1 8 26,032 26 32K 8/6/1995 4/29/2010 14.7 1 8 26,033 26 32K 5/31/1995 4/29/2010 14.9 1 8 21,159 54 30J 1/17/1997 11/8/2010 13.8 0 8 31,160 54 30J 7/18/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 0 8 31,161 54 30J 11/15/1996 11/8/2010 14.0 0 8 31,162 54 30J 1/7/1997 11/8/2010 13.8 0 8 31,163 54 30J 12/25/1996 11/8/2010 13.9 1 8 31,164 54 30J 6/5/1997 11/8/2010 13.4 1 8 31,165 54 30J 9/17/1996 11/8/2010 14.1 1 8 31,166 54 30J 10/17/1995 11/8/2010 15.1 1 8 31,167 54 30J 2/21/1996 11/8/2010 14.7 1 8 31,168 54 30J 9/16/1996 11/8/2010 14.1 1 8 31,303 9 32E 1/7/1996 3/30/2010 14.2 0 8 34,362 20 32D 2/13/1996 3/22/2010 14.1 0 8 34,363 20 32D 5/6/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 0 8 34,364 20 32D 4/14/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 0 8 34,365 20 32D 11/1/1995 3/22/2010 14.4 0 8 34,366 20 32D 6/7/1995 3/22/2010 14.8 0 8 34,367 20 32D 4/21/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 0 8 34,368 20 32D 5/6/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 0 8 34,369 20 32D 3/11/1996 3/22/2010 14.0 1 8 34,370 20 32D 5/14/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 1 8 34,371 20 32D 7/8/1996 3/22/2010 13.7 1 8 34,372 20 32D 11/14/1995 3/22/2010 14.4 1 8 34,373 20 32D 11/14/1995 3/22/2010 14.4 1 8 34,374 20 32D 1/16/1996 3/22/2010 14.2 1 8 35,245 6 32I 11/28/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 0 8 35,246 6 32I 6/10/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 35,247 6 32I 8/15/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 8 35,248 6 32I 6/7/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 35,249 6 32I 5/26/1995 4/30/2010 14.9 0 8 35,250 6 32I 9/15/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 35,251 6 32I 6/8/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 35,252 6 32I 7/16/1995 4/30/2010 14.8 0 8 35,253 6 32I 4/2/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 35,254 6 32I 1/18/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 35,255 6 32I 1/26/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 35,256 6 32I 5/4/1995 4/30/2010 15.0 1 8 35,257 6 32I 5/4/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 35,258 6 32I 5/23/1995 4/30/2010 14.9 1 8 35,259 6 32I 1/4/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 35,260 6 32I 7/12/1994 4/30/2010 15.8 1 8 35,261 6 32I 11/6/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 35,262 6 32I 12/13/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 8 35,746 18 30D 4/20/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 35,747 18 30D 3/24/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 35,748 18 30D 4/24/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 35,749 18 30D 9/27/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 3

Page 66: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 50

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,750 18 30D 2/6/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 35,751 18 30D 5/30/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 35,752 18 30D 1/16/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 35,753 18 30D 12/20/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 35,754 18 30D 12/6/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 35,755 18 30D 4/28/1995 4/30/2010 15.0 0 8 35,756 18 30D 7/9/1995 4/30/2010 14.8 0 8 35,757 18 30D 8/11/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 1 8 35,758 18 30D 6/30/1995 4/30/2010 14.8 1 8 35,759 18 30D 2/21/1995 4/30/2010 15.2 1 8 35,760 18 30D 7/26/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 1 8 35,761 18 30D 8/14/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 1 8 36,034 26 32K 12/7/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 0 8 36,035 26 32K 1/6/1996 4/29/2010 14.3 0 8 36,036 26 32K 12/7/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 0 8 36,037 26 32K 5/5/1996 4/29/2010 14.0 0 8 36,038 26 32K 12/10/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 0 8 36,039 26 32K 4/2/1996 4/29/2010 14.1 0 8 36,040 26 32K 9/28/1995 4/29/2010 14.6 0 8 36,041 26 32K 12/15/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 0 8 36,042 26 32K 12/12/1994 4/29/2010 15.4 1 8 36,043 26 32K 5/20/1995 4/29/2010 14.9 1 8 36,044 26 32K 9/11/1995 4/29/2010 14.6 1 8 36,045 26 32K 12/5/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 36,046 26 32K 12/20/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 36,047 26 32K 12/4/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 36,048 26 32K 6/8/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 8 36,049 26 32K 12/3/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 31,169 54 30J 5/5/1997 11/8/2010 13.5 0 8 41,170 54 30J 8/18/1996 11/8/2010 14.2 0 8 41,171 54 30J 7/24/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 0 8 41,172 54 30J 6/12/1996 11/8/2010 14.4 1 8 41,173 54 30J 2/25/1997 11/8/2010 13.7 1 8 41,174 54 30J 8/29/1996 11/8/2010 14.2 1 8 41,175 54 30J 6/5/1997 11/8/2010 13.4 1 8 41,176 54 30J 10/18/1996 11/8/2010 14.1 1 8 41,304 9 32E 8/12/1996 3/30/2010 13.6 0 8 41,305 9 32E 2/29/1996 3/30/2010 14.1 0 8 41,306 9 32E 12/7/1995 3/30/2010 14.3 1 8 44,375 20 32D 5/24/1996 3/22/2010 13.8 0 8 44,376 20 32D 4/4/1996 3/22/2010 14.0 0 8 44,377 20 32D 4/16/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 0 8 44,378 20 32D 9/18/1995 3/22/2010 14.5 0 8 44,379 20 32D 5/5/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 1 8 44,380 20 32D 10/28/1995 3/22/2010 14.4 1 8 44,381 20 32D 4/11/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 1 8 44,382 20 32D 8/11/1995 3/22/2010 14.6 1 8 45,263 6 32I 8/23/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 0 8 45,264 6 32I 2/14/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 45,265 6 32I 11/10/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 4

Page 67: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 51

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,266 6 32I 9/10/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 45,267 6 32I 7/30/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 8 45,268 6 32I 12/28/1995 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 45,269 6 32I 6/16/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 45,270 6 32I 3/28/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 45,271 6 32I 6/28/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 0 8 45,272 6 32I 3/16/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 45,273 6 32I 1/3/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 45,274 6 32I 5/21/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 45,275 6 32I 4/8/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 45,276 6 32I 5/19/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 45,277 6 32I 8/11/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 1 8 45,278 6 32I 4/29/1995 4/30/2010 15.0 1 8 45,279 6 32I 8/4/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 1 8 45,280 6 32I 1/25/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 8 45,762 18 30D 2/8/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 45,763 18 30D 5/18/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 45,764 18 30D 7/27/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 0 8 45,765 18 30D 9/11/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 45,766 18 30D 3/27/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 45,767 18 30D 4/3/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 45,768 18 30D 12/5/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 45,769 18 30D 3/21/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 45,770 18 30D 10/21/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 45,771 18 30D 12/19/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 1 8 45,772 18 30D 7/19/1995 4/30/2010 14.8 1 8 45,773 18 30D 12/20/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 1 8 45,774 18 30D 12/28/1995 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 45,775 18 30D 2/26/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 45,776 18 30D 3/22/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 45,777 18 30D 3/13/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 45,778 18 30D 3/10/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 8 45,779 18 30D 7/23/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 8 46,050 26 32K 2/12/1996 4/29/2010 14.2 0 8 46,051 26 32K 7/24/1996 4/29/2010 13.8 0 8 46,052 26 32K 2/10/1996 4/29/2010 14.2 0 8 46,053 26 32K 12/8/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 0 8 46,054 26 32K 5/7/1996 4/29/2010 14.0 0 8 46,055 26 32K 10/15/1995 4/29/2010 14.5 0 8 46,056 26 32K 9/26/1995 4/29/2010 14.6 0 8 46,057 26 32K 3/19/1996 4/29/2010 14.1 0 8 46,058 26 32K 9/15/1996 4/29/2010 13.6 0 8 46,059 26 32K 6/17/1995 4/29/2010 14.9 1 8 46,060 26 32K 6/15/1995 4/29/2010 14.9 1 8 46,061 26 32K 5/11/1995 4/29/2010 15.0 1 8 46,062 26 32K 6/3/1995 4/29/2010 14.9 1 8 46,063 26 32K 11/1/1995 4/29/2010 14.5 1 8 46,064 26 32K 3/20/1996 4/29/2010 14.1 1 8 41,177 54 30J 10/15/1997 11/8/2010 13.1 1 8 51,178 54 30J 10/7/1997 11/8/2010 13.1 1 8 5

Page 68: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 52

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,179 54 30J 6/15/1997 11/8/2010 13.4 1 8 51,180 54 30J 10/24/1996 11/8/2010 14.0 1 8 51,181 54 30J 6/17/1997 11/8/2010 13.4 1 8 51,307 9 32E 11/26/1995 3/30/2010 14.3 1 8 54,383 20 32D 9/7/1995 3/22/2010 14.5 0 8 54,384 20 32D 12/29/1995 3/22/2010 14.2 0 8 54,385 20 32D 8/7/1996 3/22/2010 13.6 0 8 54,386 20 32D 3/20/1996 3/22/2010 14.0 0 8 54,387 20 32D 3/21/1996 3/22/2010 14.0 0 8 54,388 20 32D 5/23/1996 3/22/2010 13.8 1 8 54,389 20 32D 6/14/1996 3/22/2010 13.8 1 8 54,390 20 32D 7/5/1995 3/22/2010 14.7 1 8 55,281 6 32I 4/15/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 55,282 6 32I 11/10/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 55,283 6 32I 5/4/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 55,284 6 32I 7/31/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 0 8 55,285 6 32I 3/5/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 55,286 6 32I 8/1/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 8 55,287 6 32I 11/7/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 55,288 6 32I 10/30/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 55,289 6 32I 9/7/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 1 8 55,290 6 32I 3/28/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 55,291 6 32I 4/4/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 55,292 6 32I 10/31/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 55,293 6 32I 4/24/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 55,780 18 30D 9/6/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 55,781 18 30D 8/9/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 8 55,782 18 30D 6/18/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 55,783 18 30D 2/23/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 55,784 18 30D 1/21/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 55,785 18 30D 1/28/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 55,786 18 30D 11/3/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 55,787 18 30D 4/13/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 55,788 18 30D 9/25/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 55,789 18 30D 9/7/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 55,790 18 30D 10/6/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 55,791 18 30D 12/15/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 55,792 18 30D 3/26/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 55,793 18 30D 1/12/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 55,794 18 30D 1/8/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 55,795 18 30D 2/10/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 55,796 18 30D 4/21/1995 4/30/2010 15.0 1 8 55,797 18 30D 3/28/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 55,798 18 30D 1/17/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 55,799 18 30D 3/14/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 55,800 18 30D 12/5/1996 4/30/2010 13.4 1 8 55,801 18 30D 2/29/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 55,802 18 30D 9/18/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 1 8 55,803 18 30D 12/29/1995 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 55,804 18 30D 5/24/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 5

Page 69: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 53

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,805 18 30D 4/27/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 56,065 26 32K 11/26/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 0 8 56,066 26 32K 12/6/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 56,067 26 32K 3/7/1995 4/29/2010 15.1 1 8 51,182 54 30J 1/19/1997 11/8/2010 13.8 0 8 61,183 54 30J 1/6/1997 11/8/2010 13.8 0 8 61,184 54 30J 5/25/1997 11/8/2010 13.5 0 8 61,185 54 30J 9/9/1996 11/8/2010 14.2 0 8 61,186 54 30J 2/27/1997 11/8/2010 13.7 1 8 64,391 20 32D 9/23/1995 3/22/2010 14.5 1 8 64,392 20 32D 3/19/1996 3/22/2010 14.0 1 8 64,393 20 32D 9/18/1995 3/22/2010 14.5 1 8 64,394 20 32D 4/29/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 1 8 65,294 6 32I 12/31/1995 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 65,295 6 32I 5/4/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 65,296 6 32I 10/28/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 65,297 6 32I 7/26/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 1 8 65,806 18 30D 12/23/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 65,807 18 30D 10/11/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 65,808 18 30D 5/9/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 0 8 65,809 18 30D 9/30/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 65,810 18 30D 2/23/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 65,811 18 30D 3/6/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 65,812 18 30D 8/4/1995 4/30/2010 14.7 0 8 65,813 18 30D 1/15/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 65,814 18 30D 2/6/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 65,815 18 30D 5/29/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 65,816 18 30D 3/11/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 65,817 18 30D 1/5/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 66,068 26 32K 6/20/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 0 8 66,069 26 32K 5/15/1995 4/29/2010 15.0 0 8 66,070 26 32K 5/25/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 0 8 66,071 26 32K 10/10/1995 4/29/2010 14.6 0 8 66,072 26 32K 12/3/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 66,073 26 32K 1/13/1996 4/29/2010 14.3 1 8 66,074 26 32K 12/4/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 1 8 66,075 26 32K 6/19/1996 4/29/2010 13.9 1 8 66,076 26 32K 11/23/1995 4/29/2010 14.4 8 61,187 54 30J 10/12/1996 11/8/2010 14.1 0 8 71,188 54 30J 3/7/1997 11/8/2010 13.7 0 8 71,189 54 30J 6/30/1997 11/8/2010 13.4 0 8 71,190 54 30J 7/14/1997 11/8/2010 13.3 1 8 75,298 6 32I 8/19/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 0 8 75,299 6 32I 3/16/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 75,300 6 32I 3/22/1995 4/30/2010 15.1 0 8 75,301 6 32I 2/14/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 75,302 6 32I 11/22/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 1 8 75,303 6 32I 9/7/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 1 8 75,304 6 32I 10/5/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 1 8 75,305 6 32I 3/18/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 7

Page 70: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 54

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,306 6 32I 2/13/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 75,307 6 32I 7/30/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 1 8 75,308 6 32I 6/26/1996 4/30/2010 13.8 1 8 75,309 6 32I 3/12/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 75,310 6 32I 4/12/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 75,311 6 32I 11/13/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 75,818 18 30D 2/9/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 0 8 75,819 18 30D 1/5/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 75,820 18 30D 11/11/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 75,821 18 30D 4/4/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 75,822 18 30D 12/3/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 75,823 18 30D 8/22/1996 4/30/2010 13.7 1 8 75,824 18 30D 6/12/1995 4/30/2010 14.9 1 8 75,825 18 30D 1/30/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 76,077 26 32K 3/8/1995 4/29/2010 15.1 0 8 76,078 26 32K 12/27/1995 4/29/2010 14.3 0 8 76,079 26 32K 4/4/1996 4/29/2010 14.1 0 8 76,080 26 32K 7/20/1995 4/29/2010 14.8 0 8 76,081 26 32K 5/3/1996 4/29/2010 14.0 0 8 71,191 54 30J 4/21/1997 11/8/2010 13.5 1 8 81,192 54 30J 8/1/1996 11/8/2010 14.3 1 8 84,395 20 32D 1/18/1996 3/22/2010 14.2 1 8 85,312 6 32I 3/26/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 0 8 85,313 6 32I 10/18/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 85,314 6 32I 10/12/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 0 8 85,315 6 32I 12/27/1995 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 85,316 6 32I 2/2/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 85,317 6 32I 10/24/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 85,318 6 32I 4/3/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 85,319 6 32I 5/15/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 85,320 6 32I 2/25/1995 4/30/2010 15.2 1 8 85,321 6 32I 4/11/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 85,322 6 32I 10/13/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 85,323 6 32I 4/17/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 85,826 18 30D 9/28/1995 4/30/2010 14.6 0 8 85,827 18 30D 4/2/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 85,828 18 30D 2/7/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 81,193 54 30J 9/12/1996 11/8/2010 14.2 0 8 91,194 54 30J 9/14/1996 11/8/2010 14.1 1 8 94,396 20 32D 5/1/1996 3/22/2010 13.9 1 8 95,324 6 32I 5/18/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 95,325 6 32I 1/13/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 1 8 95,326 6 32I 2/26/1996 4/30/2010 14.2 1 8 95,829 18 30D 6/18/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 0 8 91,195 54 30J 9/1/1996 11/8/2010 14.2 1 8 101,308 9 32E 9/5/1995 3/30/2010 14.6 1 8 101,309 9 32E 7/12/1996 3/30/2010 13.7 1 8 104,397 20 32D 7/12/1995 3/22/2010 14.7 0 8 104,398 20 32D 10/23/1995 3/22/2010 14.4 1 8 105,327 6 32I 12/21/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 1 8 10

Page 71: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 55

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,328 6 32I 10/13/1995 4/30/2010 14.5 1 8 105,830 18 30D 12/7/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 105,831 18 30D 4/26/1996 4/30/2010 14.0 1 8 101,196 54 30J 11/16/1996 11/8/2010 14.0 1 8 115,329 6 32I 5/30/1996 4/30/2010 13.9 1 8 115,330 6 32I 3/31/1996 4/30/2010 14.1 1 8 115,832 18 30D 1/5/1996 4/30/2010 14.3 0 8 115,833 18 30D 11/30/1995 4/30/2010 14.4 0 8 11679 101 41B 4/28/1989 9/13/2004 15.4 1 9 01,645 104 41A 8/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 01,646 104 41A 1/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 01,647 104 41A 2/25/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 01,648 104 41A 3/2/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 01,649 104 41A 12/23/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 01,650 105 41A 4/24/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 01,651 105 41A 5/25/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 01,652 105 41A 7/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 9 01,653 105 41A 8/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 01,654 107 41A 5/16/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 01,655 107 41A 12/7/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 01,656 107 41A 5/16/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 01,657 107 41A 1/10/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 01,658 109 41A 8/17/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 01,659 109 41A 11/20/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 03,495 23 32G 1/9/1995 4/14/2010 15.3 1 9 04,603 21 30F 11/26/1991 10/15/2010 18.9 0 9 04,604 21 30F 8/29/1992 10/15/2010 18.1 0 9 04,605 21 30F 4/4/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 0 9 04,606 21 30F 2/23/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 0 9 04,607 21 30F 11/30/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 0 9 04,608 21 30F 9/9/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 0 9 04,609 21 30F 5/3/1991 10/15/2010 19.5 1 9 04,610 21 30F 1/15/1992 10/15/2010 18.7 1 9 04,611 21 30F 9/12/1995 5/3/2010 14.6 1 9 04,612 27 30F 3/15/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 0 9 04,613 27 30F 7/9/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 0 9 04,614 27 30F 3/23/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 0 9 04,615 27 30F 5/23/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 0 9 04,616 27 30F 11/9/1995 5/3/2010 14.5 0 9 04,617 27 30F 3/18/1994 5/3/2010 16.1 0 9 04,618 27 30F 3/5/1992 11/3/2010 18.7 1 9 04,619 27 30F 8/10/1992 11/3/2010 18.2 1 9 04,620 27 30F 10/22/1991 11/3/2010 19.0 1 9 04,621 27 30F 12/8/1990 11/3/2010 19.9 1 9 04,622 27 30F 4/29/1991 11/3/2010 19.5 1 9 04,623 27 30F 7/31/1991 11/3/2010 19.3 1 9 04,624 27 30F 3/14/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 1 9 04,625 27 30F 11/4/1990 11/3/2010 20.0 1 9 04,626 27 30F 2/26/1992 11/3/2010 18.7 1 9 04,897 39 30I 10/18/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 0 9 0

Page 72: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 56

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,898 39 30I 1/23/1996 8/6/2010 14.5 0 9 04,899 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 9 04,900 39 30I 10/4/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 0 9 04,901 39 30I 1/10/1996 8/6/2010 14.6 0 9 04,902 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 9 04,903 39 30I 6/30/1996 8/6/2010 14.1 0 9 04,904 39 30I 11/4/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 0 9 04,905 39 30I 8/14/1996 8/6/2010 14.0 0 9 04,906 39 30I 10/30/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 0 9 04,907 39 30I 3/12/1996 8/6/2010 14.4 0 9 04,908 39 30I 10/17/1994 8/6/2010 15.8 0 9 04,909 39 30I 8/27/1995 8/6/2010 14.9 0 9 04,910 39 30I 5/13/1995 4/14/2010 14.9 0 9 04,911 39 30I 1/15/1995 4/14/2010 15.2 0 9 04,912 39 30I 4/26/1995 8/6/2010 15.3 1 9 04,913 39 30I 12/2/1992 8/6/2010 17.7 1 9 04,914 39 30I 1/14/1996 8/6/2010 14.6 1 9 04,915 39 30I 1/13/1996 8/6/2010 14.6 1 9 04,916 39 30I 4/13/1996 8/6/2010 14.3 1 9 04,917 39 30I 9/9/1995 8/6/2010 14.9 1 9 04,918 39 30I 8/17/1996 8/6/2010 14.0 1 9 04,919 39 30I 10/12/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 1 9 04,920 39 30I 7/14/1994 4/14/2010 15.8 1 9 04,921 39 30I 12/7/1994 4/14/2010 15.4 1 9 04,922 39 30I 3/1/1995 4/14/2010 15.1 1 9 06,082 26 32K 11/1/1994 4/29/2010 15.5 0 9 06,083 26 32K 3/14/1995 4/29/2010 15.1 1 9 074 30 30B 2/4/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 0 9 175 30 30B 11/24/1991 9/2/2006 14.8 0 9 176 30 30B 4/18/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 0 9 177 30 30B 7/30/1995 3/24/2010 14.7 0 9 178 30 30B 9/30/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 1 9 179 30 30B 1/20/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 1 9 180 30 30B 10/28/1994 3/24/2010 15.4 1 9 181 30 30B 8/29/1992 9/2/2006 14.0 9 182 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 11,197 55 30J 8/12/1995 11/8/2010 15.2 0 9 11,198 55 30J 7/24/1995 11/8/2010 15.3 0 9 11,199 55 30J 12/19/1995 11/8/2010 14.9 1 9 11,200 55 30J 4/10/1996 11/8/2010 14.6 1 9 11,310 9 32E 6/30/1994 3/30/2010 15.7 0 9 11,311 9 32E 10/3/1994 3/30/2010 15.5 0 9 11,660 104 41A 3/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 11,661 104 41A 2/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 11,662 104 41A 7/25/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 9 11,663 104 41A 9/28/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 11,664 104 41A 3/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 11,665 104 41A 8/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 11,666 104 41A 6/24/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 11,667 104 41A 6/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 1

Page 73: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 57

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,668 105 41A 2/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 11,669 105 41A 6/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 11,670 105 41A 12/7/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 11,671 105 41A 1/5/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 11,672 105 41A 7/18/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 11,673 105 41A 2/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 9 11,674 107 41A 12/27/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 11,675 107 41A 6/15/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 11,676 107 41A 7/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 9 11,677 107 41A 3/17/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 11,678 107 41A 4/26/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 11,679 107 41A 9/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 11,680 107 41A 9/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.0 1 9 11,681 107 41A 12/19/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 11,682 109 41A 11/17/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 11,683 109 41A 1/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 9 11,684 109 41A 1/30/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 13,496 23 32G 1/9/1995 4/14/2010 15.3 0 9 13,497 23 32G 4/7/1995 4/14/2010 15.0 1 9 13,529 35 30E 9/8/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 0 9 13,530 35 30E 5/13/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 0 9 13,531 35 30E 12/6/1993 4/9/2010 16.3 1 9 13,532 35 30E 3/16/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 1 9 13,533 35 30E 2/3/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 13,534 35 30E 2/1/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 14,399 38 32D 3/5/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 1 9 14,400 38 32D 5/19/1995 3/22/2010 14.8 1 9 14,401 38 32D 4/20/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 1 9 14,402 38 32D 7/5/1995 3/22/2010 14.7 1 9 14,403 38 32D 3/6/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 1 9 14,548 5 32B 7/6/1994 3/18/2010 15.7 0 9 14,549 5 32B 7/27/1995 3/18/2010 14.6 0 9 14,550 5 32B 9/14/1994 3/18/2010 15.5 0 9 14,551 5 32B 3/14/1995 3/18/2010 15.0 0 9 14,552 5 32B 4/21/1994 3/18/2010 15.9 0 9 14,553 5 32B 3/28/1995 3/18/2010 15.0 0 9 14,554 5 32B 8/31/1993 3/18/2010 16.5 1 9 14,627 21 30F 4/30/1992 10/15/2010 18.5 0 9 14,628 21 30F 12/3/1991 10/15/2010 18.9 0 9 14,629 21 30F 4/12/1992 10/15/2010 18.5 0 9 14,630 21 30F 5/20/1991 10/15/2010 19.4 0 9 14,631 21 30F 8/25/1992 10/15/2010 18.1 0 9 14,632 21 30F 12/12/1991 10/15/2010 18.8 0 9 14,633 21 30F 10/3/1991 10/15/2010 19.0 0 9 14,634 21 30F 9/20/1991 10/15/2010 19.1 0 9 14,635 21 30F 8/9/1991 10/15/2010 19.2 0 9 14,636 21 30F 8/4/1992 10/15/2010 18.2 0 9 14,637 21 30F 6/3/1992 10/15/2010 18.4 0 9 14,638 21 30F 1/11/1992 10/15/2010 18.8 0 9 14,639 21 30F 7/16/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 1

Page 74: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 58

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,640 21 30F 2/5/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 0 9 14,641 21 30F 2/28/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 0 9 14,642 21 30F 3/15/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 0 9 14,643 21 30F 6/30/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 14,644 21 30F 10/12/1993 5/3/2010 16.6 0 9 14,645 21 30F 5/11/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 14,646 21 30F 11/15/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 0 9 14,647 21 30F 8/28/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 0 9 14,648 21 30F 8/13/1992 10/15/2010 18.2 1 9 14,649 21 30F 8/26/1992 10/15/2010 18.1 1 9 14,650 21 30F 8/18/1992 10/15/2010 18.2 1 9 14,651 21 30F 8/12/1991 10/15/2010 19.2 1 9 14,652 21 30F 8/17/1992 10/15/2010 18.2 1 9 14,653 21 30F 8/7/1992 10/15/2010 18.2 1 9 14,654 21 30F 1/26/1992 10/15/2010 18.7 1 9 14,655 21 30F 8/1/1994 5/3/2010 15.8 1 9 14,656 21 30F 1/5/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 1 9 14,657 21 30F 9/4/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 1 9 14,658 21 30F 8/22/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 1 9 14,659 21 30F 3/20/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 14,660 21 30F 6/7/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 1 9 14,661 21 30F 9/25/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 1 9 14,662 21 30F 1/9/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 1 9 14,663 21 30F 4/19/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 9 14,664 27 30F 1/8/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 0 9 14,665 27 30F 4/3/1991 11/3/2010 19.6 0 9 14,666 27 30F 6/30/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 0 9 14,667 27 30F 1/10/1994 11/3/2010 16.8 0 9 14,668 27 30F 7/12/1990 11/3/2010 20.3 0 9 14,669 27 30F 11/15/1991 11/3/2010 19.0 0 9 14,670 27 30F 1/14/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 0 9 14,671 27 30F 3/22/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 0 9 14,672 27 30F 12/19/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 0 9 14,673 27 30F 11/29/1990 11/3/2010 19.9 0 9 14,674 27 30F 6/27/1991 11/3/2010 19.4 0 9 14,675 27 30F 9/21/1991 11/3/2010 19.1 0 9 14,676 27 30F 1/26/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 0 9 14,677 27 30F 10/23/1991 11/3/2010 19.0 0 9 14,678 27 30F 6/9/1992 11/3/2010 18.4 0 9 14,679 27 30F 12/27/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 0 9 14,680 27 30F 2/6/1992 11/3/2010 18.7 0 9 14,681 27 30F 3/14/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 0 9 14,682 27 30F 7/11/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 0 9 14,683 27 30F 1/23/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 0 9 14,684 27 30F 6/4/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 0 9 14,685 27 30F 11/15/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 0 9 14,686 27 30F 4/29/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 14,687 27 30F 2/28/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 0 9 14,688 27 30F 4/26/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 14,689 27 30F 3/17/1994 5/3/2010 16.1 0 9 1

Page 75: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 59

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,690 27 30F 5/11/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 9 14,691 27 30F 5/12/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 14,692 27 30F 5/15/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 14,693 27 30F 4/18/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 14,694 27 30F 1/7/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 14,695 27 30F 4/5/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 0 9 14,696 27 30F 11/9/1990 11/3/2010 20.0 1 9 14,697 27 30F 11/15/1991 11/3/2010 19.0 1 9 14,698 27 30F 7/16/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 1 9 14,699 27 30F 2/3/1992 11/3/2010 18.7 1 9 14,700 27 30F 8/8/1991 11/3/2010 19.2 1 9 14,701 27 30F 1/9/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 1 9 14,702 27 30F 1/27/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 1 9 14,703 27 30F 12/13/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 1 9 14,704 27 30F 11/24/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 1 9 14,705 27 30F 6/7/1992 11/3/2010 18.4 1 9 14,706 27 30F 5/19/1992 11/3/2010 18.5 1 9 14,707 27 30F 11/11/1991 11/3/2010 19.0 1 9 14,708 27 30F 2/8/1993 11/3/2010 17.7 1 9 14,709 27 30F 4/25/1993 11/3/2010 17.5 1 9 14,710 27 30F 5/24/1992 11/3/2010 18.4 1 9 14,711 27 30F 7/12/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 1 9 14,712 27 30F 5/26/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 1 9 14,713 27 30F 7/17/1994 5/3/2010 15.8 1 9 14,714 27 30F 9/5/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 1 9 14,715 27 30F 12/24/1993 5/3/2010 16.4 1 9 14,923 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 9 14,924 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 9 14,925 39 30I 4/18/1995 8/6/2010 15.3 0 9 14,926 39 30I 1/31/1996 8/6/2010 14.5 0 9 14,927 39 30I 10/22/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 0 9 14,928 39 30I 11/16/1995 8/6/2010 14.7 0 9 14,929 39 30I 4/17/1996 8/6/2010 14.3 0 9 14,930 39 30I 8/17/1996 8/6/2010 14.0 0 9 14,931 39 30I 3/10/1996 8/6/2010 14.4 0 9 14,932 39 30I 9/13/1995 8/6/2010 14.9 0 9 14,933 39 30I 5/12/1994 8/6/2010 16.2 0 9 14,934 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 9 14,935 39 30I 12/15/1994 4/14/2010 15.3 0 9 14,936 39 30I 3/31/1995 4/14/2010 15.0 0 9 14,937 39 30I 10/25/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 0 9 14,938 39 30I 7/20/1994 8/6/2010 16.0 1 9 14,939 39 30I 5/16/1996 8/6/2010 14.2 1 9 14,940 39 30I 6/3/1996 8/6/2010 14.2 1 9 14,941 39 30I 12/5/1995 8/6/2010 14.7 1 9 14,942 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 9 14,943 39 30I 10/29/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 1 9 14,944 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 9 14,945 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 9 14,946 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 9 1

Page 76: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 60

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,947 39 30I 4/14/2010 1 9 16,084 26 32K 11/1/1994 4/29/2010 15.5 0 9 16,085 50 32K 2/6/1995 5/5/2010 15.2 0 9 16,086 50 32K 11/25/1993 5/5/2010 16.4 0 9 16,087 50 32K 5/13/1995 5/5/2010 15.0 1 9 16,088 50 32K 9/23/1994 5/5/2010 15.6 1 9 183 30 30B 8/26/1991 9/2/2006 15.0 0 9 284 30 30B 9/27/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 0 9 285 30 30B 4/19/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 0 9 286 30 30B 5/29/1992 9/2/2006 14.3 0 9 287 30 30B 4/23/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 0 9 288 30 30B 2/20/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 289 30 30B 1/15/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 0 9 290 30 30B 9/2/2006 0 9 291 30 30B 8/21/1992 9/2/2006 14.0 0 9 292 30 30B 3/10/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 293 30 30B 9/2/2006 0 9 294 30 30B 8/2/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 0 9 295 30 30B 4/16/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 0 9 296 30 30B 12/28/1994 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 297 30 30B 5/26/1995 3/24/2010 14.8 0 9 298 30 30B 11/9/1993 3/24/2010 16.4 0 9 299 30 30B 8/23/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 0 9 2100 30 30B 5/20/1992 9/2/2006 14.3 1 9 2101 30 30B 4/20/1991 9/2/2006 15.4 1 9 2102 30 30B 6/5/1991 9/2/2006 15.2 1 9 2103 30 30B 11/1/1994 3/24/2010 15.4 1 9 2104 30 30B 12/20/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 1 9 2105 30 30B 5/2/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 1 9 2106 30 30B 3/17/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 1 9 2107 30 30B 5/17/1992 9/2/2006 14.3 9 2108 30 30B 10/25/1992 9/2/2006 13.9 9 2109 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 21,201 55 30J 6/19/1996 11/8/2010 14.4 0 9 21,202 55 30J 6/7/1996 11/8/2010 14.4 0 9 21,203 55 30J 6/26/1996 11/8/2010 14.4 0 9 21,204 55 30J 9/30/1995 11/8/2010 15.1 1 9 21,205 55 30J 7/28/1995 11/8/2010 15.3 1 9 21,206 55 30J 1/14/1996 11/8/2010 14.8 1 9 21,312 9 32E 3/12/1995 3/30/2010 15.0 9 21,685 104 41A 11/22/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 21,686 104 41A 6/20/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 21,687 104 41A 2/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 21,688 104 41A 8/2/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 21,689 104 41A 11/24/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 21,690 104 41A 4/18/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 21,691 104 41A 12/9/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 21,692 104 41A 8/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 21,693 104 41A 2/18/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 21,694 104 41A 2/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 9 2

Page 77: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 61

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,695 104 41A 10/15/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 21,696 104 41A 9/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 21,697 104 41A 11/20/1992 9/20/2006 13.8 1 9 21,698 104 41A 4/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 9 21,699 104 41A 5/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 21,700 104 41A 11/16/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 9 21,701 104 41A 2/19/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 21,702 105 41A 11/23/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 21,703 105 41A 5/7/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 21,704 105 41A 3/26/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 21,705 105 41A 12/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 9 21,706 105 41A 3/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 21,707 105 41A 3/30/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 21,708 105 41A 8/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 21,709 105 41A 10/29/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 21,710 105 41A 4/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 21,711 105 41A 7/6/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 21,712 105 41A 4/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 21,713 105 41A 7/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 21,714 105 41A 1/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 21,715 105 41A 8/29/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 21,716 105 41A 2/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 21,717 105 41A 1/12/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 21,718 105 41A 12/19/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 21,719 107 41A 4/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 21,720 107 41A 11/14/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 21,721 107 41A 4/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 9 21,722 107 41A 6/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 21,723 107 41A 11/13/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 21,724 107 41A 9/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.0 0 9 21,725 107 41A 5/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 9 21,726 107 41A 8/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 21,727 107 41A 2/14/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 21,728 107 41A 7/6/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 21,729 108 41A 5/24/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 9 21,730 109 41A 7/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 9 21,731 109 41A 10/20/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 21,732 109 41A 7/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 21,733 109 41A 12/15/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 21,734 109 41A 11/28/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 21,735 109 41A 1/15/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 21,736 109 41A 12/19/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 21,737 109 41A 8/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 21,738 109 41A 6/12/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 9 21,739 109 41A 6/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 21,740 109 41A 5/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 23,535 35 30E 6/15/1995 4/9/2010 14.8 0 9 23,536 35 30E 4/17/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 0 9 23,537 35 30E 9/28/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 0 9 23,538 35 30E 11/15/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 0 9 2

Page 78: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 62

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,539 35 30E 8/26/1995 4/9/2010 14.6 0 9 23,540 35 30E 8/31/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 1 9 23,541 35 30E 11/2/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 23,542 35 30E 10/27/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 23,543 35 30E 1/11/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 23,544 35 30E 9/24/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 1 9 24,404 38 32D 11/1/1994 3/22/2010 15.4 0 9 24,405 38 32D 7/30/1995 3/22/2010 14.6 0 9 24,406 38 32D 10/8/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 0 9 24,407 38 32D 12/31/1994 3/22/2010 15.2 0 9 24,408 38 32D 11/12/1994 3/22/2010 15.4 0 9 24,409 38 32D 10/6/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 24,410 38 32D 5/12/1994 3/22/2010 15.9 1 9 24,411 38 32D 5/29/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 1 9 24,412 38 32D 2/13/1995 3/22/2010 15.1 1 9 24,413 38 32D 9/26/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 24,414 38 32D 9/17/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 24,415 38 32D 11/18/1994 3/22/2010 15.3 1 9 24,416 38 32D 9/1/1994 3/22/2010 15.6 1 9 24,417 38 32D 7/13/1994 3/22/2010 15.7 1 9 24,555 5 32B 3/10/1995 3/18/2010 15.0 0 9 24,556 5 32B 11/17/1994 3/18/2010 15.3 0 9 24,557 5 32B 3/27/1994 3/18/2010 16.0 0 9 24,558 5 32B 11/19/1993 3/18/2010 16.3 0 9 24,559 5 32B 3/30/1995 3/18/2010 15.0 1 9 24,560 5 32B 6/30/1994 3/18/2010 15.7 1 9 24,561 5 32B 6/28/1994 3/18/2010 15.7 1 9 24,716 21 30F 5/2/1992 10/15/2010 18.5 0 9 24,717 21 30F 4/1/1992 10/15/2010 18.5 0 9 24,718 21 30F 7/15/1992 10/15/2010 18.3 0 9 24,719 21 30F 3/2/1991 10/15/2010 19.6 0 9 24,720 21 30F 8/27/1991 10/15/2010 19.1 0 9 24,721 21 30F 6/22/1991 10/15/2010 19.3 0 9 24,722 21 30F 10/23/1991 10/15/2010 19.0 0 9 24,723 21 30F 8/9/1992 10/15/2010 18.2 0 9 24,724 21 30F 4/28/1992 10/15/2010 18.5 0 9 24,725 21 30F 9/5/1991 10/15/2010 19.1 0 9 24,726 21 30F 5/24/1992 10/15/2010 18.4 0 9 24,727 21 30F 8/22/1991 10/15/2010 19.1 0 9 24,728 21 30F 1/3/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 24,729 21 30F 1/13/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 24,730 21 30F 7/29/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 24,731 21 30F 9/20/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 0 9 24,732 21 30F 4/22/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 24,733 21 30F 2/27/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 0 9 24,734 21 30F 5/24/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 0 9 24,735 21 30F 3/17/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 0 9 24,736 21 30F 12/2/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 0 9 24,737 21 30F 4/20/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 24,738 21 30F 6/22/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 0 9 2

Page 79: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 63

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,739 21 30F 3/5/1994 5/3/2010 16.2 0 9 24,740 21 30F 7/13/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 24,741 21 30F 3/6/1992 10/15/2010 18.6 1 9 24,742 21 30F 6/4/1991 10/15/2010 19.4 1 9 24,743 21 30F 6/8/1992 10/15/2010 18.4 1 9 24,744 21 30F 10/8/1991 10/15/2010 19.0 1 9 24,745 21 30F 12/24/1991 10/15/2010 18.8 1 9 24,746 21 30F 6/12/1992 10/15/2010 18.3 1 9 24,747 21 30F 6/16/1992 10/15/2010 18.3 1 9 24,748 21 30F 5/15/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 1 9 24,749 21 30F 9/18/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 1 9 24,750 21 30F 8/24/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 1 9 24,751 21 30F 4/12/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 24,752 21 30F 1/15/1996 5/3/2010 14.3 1 9 24,753 21 30F 4/19/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 1 9 24,754 21 30F 2/1/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 1 9 24,755 21 30F 9/26/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 1 9 24,756 21 30F 8/27/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 1 9 24,757 21 30F 5/4/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 1 9 24,758 21 30F 8/24/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 1 9 24,759 27 30F 8/1/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 0 9 24,760 27 30F 7/27/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 0 9 24,761 27 30F 5/13/1992 11/3/2010 18.5 0 9 24,762 27 30F 4/3/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 0 9 24,763 27 30F 8/25/1992 11/3/2010 18.2 0 9 24,764 27 30F 2/20/1992 11/3/2010 18.7 0 9 24,765 27 30F 4/19/1992 11/3/2010 18.5 0 9 24,766 27 30F 9/15/1992 11/3/2010 18.1 0 9 24,767 27 30F 1/20/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 0 9 24,768 27 30F 12/24/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 0 9 24,769 27 30F 9/22/1995 5/3/2010 14.6 0 9 24,770 27 30F 11/28/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 0 9 24,771 27 30F 5/22/1994 5/3/2010 15.9 0 9 24,772 27 30F 12/25/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 0 9 24,773 27 30F 4/6/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 0 9 24,774 27 30F 4/9/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 0 9 24,775 27 30F 8/27/1995 5/3/2010 14.7 0 9 24,776 27 30F 9/12/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 0 9 24,777 27 30F 4/6/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 1 9 24,778 27 30F 12/5/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 1 9 24,779 27 30F 12/8/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 1 9 24,780 27 30F 5/2/1992 11/3/2010 18.5 1 9 24,781 27 30F 1/10/1991 11/3/2010 19.8 1 9 24,782 27 30F 7/24/1991 11/3/2010 19.3 1 9 24,783 27 30F 7/4/1990 11/3/2010 20.3 1 9 24,784 27 30F 9/18/1991 11/3/2010 19.1 1 9 24,785 27 30F 11/2/1992 11/3/2010 18.0 1 9 24,786 27 30F 10/20/1991 11/3/2010 19.0 1 9 24,787 27 30F 1/27/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 1 9 24,788 27 30F 12/20/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 1 9 2

Page 80: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 64

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,789 27 30F 12/12/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 1 9 24,790 27 30F 3/28/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 9 24,948 39 30I 1/4/1996 8/6/2010 14.6 0 9 24,949 39 30I 5/16/1996 8/6/2010 14.2 0 9 24,950 39 30I 8/29/1995 8/6/2010 14.9 0 9 24,951 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 9 24,952 39 30I 8/13/1996 8/6/2010 14.0 0 9 24,953 39 30I 7/27/1995 8/6/2010 15.0 0 9 24,954 39 30I 8/15/1995 4/14/2010 14.7 0 9 24,955 39 30I 4/14/2010 0 9 24,956 39 30I 6/12/1995 4/14/2010 14.8 0 9 24,957 39 30I 10/21/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 0 9 24,958 39 30I 8/12/1995 4/14/2010 14.7 0 9 24,959 39 30I 12/12/1995 4/14/2010 14.3 0 9 24,960 39 30I 10/29/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 0 9 24,961 39 30I 11/12/1995 8/6/2010 14.7 1 9 24,962 39 30I 11/13/1995 8/6/2010 14.7 1 9 24,963 39 30I 2/28/1996 8/6/2010 14.4 1 9 24,964 39 30I 5/30/1996 8/6/2010 14.2 1 9 24,965 39 30I 8/8/1996 8/6/2010 14.0 1 9 24,966 39 30I 9/19/1995 8/6/2010 14.9 1 9 24,967 39 30I 2/7/1995 4/14/2010 15.2 1 9 24,968 39 30I 4/6/1994 4/14/2010 16.0 1 9 24,969 39 30I 2/6/1995 4/14/2010 15.2 1 9 24,970 39 30I 8/15/1995 4/14/2010 14.7 1 9 26,089 26 32K 10/7/1994 4/29/2010 15.6 0 9 26,090 26 32K 5/18/1994 4/29/2010 15.9 1 9 26,091 50 32K 3/19/1995 5/5/2010 15.1 0 9 26,092 50 32K 6/1/1995 5/5/2010 14.9 0 9 26,093 50 32K 3/29/1994 5/5/2010 16.1 0 9 26,094 50 32K 2/22/1994 5/5/2010 16.2 0 9 26,095 50 32K 6/13/1995 5/5/2010 14.9 1 9 26,096 50 32K 10/11/1994 5/5/2010 15.6 1 9 26,097 50 32K 1/31/1995 5/5/2010 15.3 1 9 21 15 32L 6/29/1995 5/7/2010 14.9 0 9 32 15 32L 10/8/1994 5/7/2010 15.6 0 9 3110 30 30B 10/29/1991 9/2/2006 14.8 0 9 3111 30 30B 3/23/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 0 9 3112 30 30B 12/14/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 3113 30 30B 12/12/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 3114 30 30B 9/5/1991 9/2/2006 15.0 0 9 3115 30 30B 7/8/1991 9/2/2006 15.2 0 9 3116 30 30B 8/8/1992 9/2/2006 14.1 0 9 3117 30 30B 3/20/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 3118 30 30B 3/17/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 3119 30 30B 1/27/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 0 9 3120 30 30B 5/27/1992 9/2/2006 14.3 0 9 3121 30 30B 9/24/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 0 9 3122 30 30B 8/22/1992 9/2/2006 14.0 0 9 3123 30 30B 8/3/1991 9/2/2006 15.1 0 9 3

Page 81: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 65

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

124 30 30B 12/19/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 3125 30 30B 8/29/1994 3/24/2010 15.6 0 9 3126 30 30B 7/14/1995 3/24/2010 14.7 0 9 3127 30 30B 4/4/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 0 9 3128 30 30B 2/28/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 0 9 3129 30 30B 12/20/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 0 9 3130 30 30B 3/29/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 0 9 3131 30 30B 2/13/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 0 9 3132 30 30B 12/24/1994 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 3133 30 30B 4/18/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 0 9 3134 30 30B 8/13/1991 9/2/2006 15.1 1 9 3135 30 30B 10/20/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 1 9 3136 30 30B 3/25/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 1 9 3137 30 30B 3/24/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 1 9 3138 30 30B 12/19/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 3139 30 30B 2/20/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 1 9 3140 30 30B 12/15/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 1 9 3141 30 30B 10/27/1994 3/24/2010 15.4 1 9 3142 30 30B 1/31/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 1 9 3143 30 30B 5/7/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 1 9 3144 30 30B 9/3/2010 9 31,207 55 30J 5/19/1996 11/8/2010 14.5 0 9 31,208 55 30J 3/14/1996 11/8/2010 14.7 0 9 31,209 55 30J 11/8/2010 0 9 31,210 55 30J 2/23/1996 11/8/2010 14.7 1 9 31,211 55 30J 10/24/1995 11/8/2010 15.0 1 9 31,212 55 30J 12/19/1995 11/8/2010 14.9 1 9 31,313 9 32E 1/11/1995 3/30/2010 15.2 0 9 31,314 9 32E 4/4/1995 3/30/2010 15.0 0 9 31,315 9 32E 9/23/1994 3/30/2010 15.5 0 9 31,741 104 41A 3/12/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 9 31,742 104 41A 6/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 31,743 104 41A 1/16/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 31,744 104 41A 10/29/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 31,745 104 41A 1/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 31,746 104 41A 5/12/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 31,747 104 41A 6/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 31,748 104 41A 11/25/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 31,749 104 41A 3/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 31,750 104 41A 3/17/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 31,751 104 41A 2/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 31,752 104 41A 10/31/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 31,753 104 41A 4/8/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 31,754 104 41A 1/14/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 31,755 104 41A 3/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 31,756 104 41A 6/26/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 31,757 104 41A 2/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 31,758 104 41A 10/25/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 31,759 105 41A 11/27/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 31,760 105 41A 1/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 3

Page 82: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 66

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,761 105 41A 2/1/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 31,762 105 41A 11/25/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 31,763 105 41A 4/17/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 9 31,764 105 41A 2/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 9 31,765 105 41A 5/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 31,766 105 41A 7/19/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 31,767 105 41A 12/4/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 31,768 105 41A 2/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 31,769 105 41A 5/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 9 31,770 105 41A 2/19/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 31,771 107 41A 8/19/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 31,772 107 41A 7/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 31,773 107 41A 9/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 31,774 107 41A 6/6/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 31,775 107 41A 4/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 31,776 107 41A 11/4/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 31,777 107 41A 6/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 31,778 107 41A 11/30/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 31,779 107 41A 7/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 31,780 107 41A 10/26/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 31,781 107 41A 9/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 31,782 107 41A 9/22/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 9 31,783 107 41A 9/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 31,784 107 41A 3/25/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 31,785 107 41A 12/11/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 31,786 107 41A 3/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 31,787 107 41A 7/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 31,788 107 41A 8/17/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 31,789 107 41A 12/7/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 31,790 109 41A 4/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 31,791 109 41A 2/7/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 31,792 109 41A 12/26/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 33,498 23 32G 2/27/1995 4/14/2010 15.1 0 9 33,499 23 32G 1/9/1995 4/14/2010 15.3 1 9 33,500 23 32G 8/8/1994 4/14/2010 15.7 1 9 33,501 23 32G 12/18/1994 4/14/2010 15.3 1 9 33,502 23 32G 11/14/1994 4/14/2010 15.4 1 9 33,545 35 30E 4/9/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 0 9 33,546 35 30E 7/6/1994 4/9/2010 15.8 0 9 33,547 35 30E 5/30/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 0 9 33,548 35 30E 10/16/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 0 9 33,549 35 30E 3/8/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 33,550 35 30E 6/26/1995 4/9/2010 14.8 0 9 33,551 35 30E 12/20/1994 4/9/2010 15.3 0 9 33,552 35 30E 5/17/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 1 9 33,553 35 30E 3/14/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 1 9 33,554 35 30E 6/18/1995 4/9/2010 14.8 1 9 33,555 35 30E 12/16/1994 4/9/2010 15.3 1 9 33,556 35 30E 3/26/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 1 9 33,557 35 30E 7/21/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 1 9 3

Page 83: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 67

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,558 35 30E 11/26/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 33,559 35 30E 11/25/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 33,560 35 30E 12/6/1994 4/9/2010 15.3 1 9 34,418 38 32D 4/30/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 0 9 34,419 38 32D 6/17/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 0 9 34,420 38 32D 11/14/1994 3/22/2010 15.4 1 9 34,421 38 32D 12/12/1994 3/22/2010 15.3 1 9 34,422 38 32D 4/14/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 1 9 34,423 38 32D 1/12/1995 3/22/2010 15.2 1 9 34,424 38 32D 4/10/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 1 9 34,425 38 32D 12/2/1994 3/22/2010 15.3 1 9 34,426 38 32D 2/14/1995 3/22/2010 15.1 1 9 34,427 38 32D 9/16/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 34,562 5 32B 4/8/1995 3/18/2010 14.9 0 9 34,563 5 32B 1/10/1995 3/18/2010 15.2 0 9 34,564 5 32B 9/12/1994 3/18/2010 15.5 0 9 34,565 5 32B 4/29/1995 3/18/2010 14.9 0 9 34,566 5 32B 7/27/1995 3/18/2010 14.6 0 9 34,567 5 32B 6/11/1993 3/18/2010 16.8 1 9 34,568 5 32B 1/9/1995 3/18/2010 15.2 1 9 34,791 21 30F 7/10/1991 10/15/2010 19.3 0 9 34,792 21 30F 12/7/1991 10/15/2010 18.9 0 9 34,793 21 30F 9/30/1992 10/15/2010 18.0 0 9 34,794 21 30F 12/9/1991 10/15/2010 18.9 0 9 34,795 21 30F 9/6/1991 10/15/2010 19.1 0 9 34,796 21 30F 8/5/1992 10/15/2010 18.2 0 9 34,797 21 30F 7/15/1992 10/15/2010 18.3 0 9 34,798 21 30F 12/20/1992 5/3/2010 17.4 0 9 34,799 21 30F 8/19/1995 5/3/2010 14.7 0 9 34,800 21 30F 4/25/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 34,801 21 30F 6/11/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 0 9 34,802 21 30F 10/29/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 0 9 34,803 21 30F 3/4/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 0 9 34,804 21 30F 11/3/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 0 9 34,805 21 30F 7/25/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 34,806 21 30F 1/20/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 34,807 21 30F 3/28/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 0 9 34,808 21 30F 7/12/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 34,809 21 30F 5/18/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 9 34,810 21 30F 2/28/1992 10/15/2010 18.6 1 9 34,811 21 30F 1/26/1992 10/15/2010 18.7 1 9 34,812 21 30F 3/20/1994 5/3/2010 16.1 1 9 34,813 21 30F 5/3/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 1 9 34,814 21 30F 12/8/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 1 9 34,815 21 30F 1/1/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 1 9 34,816 21 30F 4/15/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 1 9 34,817 27 30F 2/10/1992 11/3/2010 18.7 0 9 34,818 27 30F 6/22/1992 11/3/2010 18.4 0 9 34,819 27 30F 8/5/1992 11/3/2010 18.2 0 9 34,820 27 30F 9/4/1990 11/3/2010 20.2 0 9 3

Page 84: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 68

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,821 27 30F 9/9/1991 11/3/2010 19.2 0 9 34,822 27 30F 7/14/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 0 9 34,823 27 30F 9/20/1992 11/3/2010 18.1 0 9 34,824 27 30F 9/5/1994 5/3/2010 15.7 0 9 34,825 27 30F 10/16/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 0 9 34,826 27 30F 8/30/1995 5/3/2010 14.7 0 9 34,827 27 30F 1/18/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 34,828 27 30F 7/22/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 34,829 27 30F 12/30/1994 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 34,830 27 30F 1/12/1992 11/3/2010 18.8 1 9 34,831 27 30F 8/3/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 1 9 34,832 27 30F 12/15/1991 11/3/2010 18.9 1 9 34,833 27 30F 3/13/1991 11/3/2010 19.6 1 9 34,834 27 30F 8/1/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 1 9 34,835 27 30F 7/21/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 1 9 34,836 27 30F 4/25/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 1 9 34,971 39 30I 8/16/1996 8/6/2010 14.0 0 9 34,972 39 30I 4/14/2010 0 9 34,973 39 30I 2/14/1993 4/14/2010 17.2 0 9 34,974 39 30I 10/10/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 0 9 34,975 39 30I 10/11/1993 4/14/2010 16.5 0 9 34,976 39 30I 8/3/1995 4/14/2010 14.7 0 9 34,977 39 30I 4/14/2010 0 9 34,978 39 30I 10/11/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 1 9 34,979 39 30I 8/1/1996 8/6/2010 14.0 1 9 34,980 39 30I 3/14/1996 8/6/2010 14.4 1 9 34,981 39 30I 6/22/1996 8/6/2010 14.1 1 9 34,982 39 30I 10/4/1995 8/6/2010 14.8 1 9 34,983 39 30I 12/16/1995 8/6/2010 14.6 1 9 34,984 39 30I 12/8/1994 4/14/2010 15.3 1 9 34,985 39 30I 11/1/1993 4/14/2010 16.4 1 9 36,098 26 32K 5/18/1994 4/29/2010 15.9 0 9 36,099 26 32K 9/30/1994 4/29/2010 15.6 1 9 36,100 50 32K 1/31/1995 5/5/2010 15.3 0 9 36,101 50 32K 7/22/1995 5/5/2010 14.8 0 9 36,102 50 32K 12/27/1994 5/5/2010 15.4 0 9 36,103 50 32K 5/24/1994 5/5/2010 15.9 0 9 36,104 50 32K 3/30/1995 5/5/2010 15.1 0 9 36,105 50 32K 11/10/1994 5/5/2010 15.5 1 9 36,106 50 32K 1/1/1995 5/5/2010 15.3 1 9 36,107 50 32K 4/5/1995 5/5/2010 15.1 1 9 36,108 50 32K 3/9/1995 5/5/2010 15.2 1 9 36,109 50 32K 9/22/1994 5/5/2010 15.6 1 9 33 15 32L 7/25/1991 5/7/2010 18.8 1 9 4145 30 30B 9/10/1991 9/2/2006 15.0 0 9 4146 30 30B 6/17/1992 9/2/2006 14.2 0 9 4147 30 30B 7/18/1991 9/2/2006 15.1 0 9 4148 30 30B 1/30/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 0 9 4149 30 30B 9/2/2006 0 9 4150 30 30B 1/20/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 0 9 4

Page 85: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 69

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

151 30 30B 3/30/1990 9/2/2006 16.4 0 9 4152 30 30B 6/5/1991 9/2/2006 15.2 0 9 4153 30 30B 7/22/1995 3/24/2010 14.7 0 9 4154 30 30B 1/11/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 4155 30 30B 6/8/1995 3/24/2010 14.8 0 9 4156 30 30B 1/9/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 4157 30 30B 9/22/1994 3/24/2010 15.5 0 9 4158 30 30B 7/11/1995 3/24/2010 14.7 0 9 4159 30 30B 11/27/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 0 9 4160 30 30B 8/31/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 0 9 4161 30 30B 4/15/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 0 9 4162 30 30B 1/10/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 1 9 4163 30 30B 1/11/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 1 9 4164 30 30B 2/22/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 1 9 4165 30 30B 12/14/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 4166 30 30B 2/16/1991 9/2/2006 15.5 1 9 4167 30 30B 3/5/1991 9/2/2006 15.5 1 9 4168 30 30B 3/21/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 1 9 4169 30 30B 8/10/1991 9/2/2006 15.1 1 9 4170 30 30B 6/13/1992 9/2/2006 14.2 1 9 4171 30 30B 3/16/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 1 9 4172 30 30B 4/22/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 1 9 4173 30 30B 8/8/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 1 9 4174 30 30B 5/9/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 1 9 4175 30 30B 6/11/1995 3/24/2010 14.8 1 9 4176 30 30B 9/18/1994 3/24/2010 15.5 1 9 4177 30 30B 6/30/1994 3/24/2010 15.7 1 9 4178 30 30B 8/13/1994 3/24/2010 15.6 1 9 4179 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 41,213 55 30J 4/29/1996 11/8/2010 14.5 0 9 41,214 55 30J 10/7/1995 11/8/2010 15.1 0 9 41,215 55 30J 7/20/1996 11/8/2010 14.3 0 9 41,216 55 30J 2/29/1996 11/8/2010 14.7 0 9 41,217 55 30J 10/7/1995 11/8/2010 15.1 0 9 41,218 55 30J 1/21/1996 11/8/2010 14.8 0 9 41,219 55 30J 5/31/1996 11/8/2010 14.4 0 9 41,220 55 30J 11/19/1995 11/8/2010 15.0 1 9 41,221 55 30J 2/17/1996 11/8/2010 14.7 1 9 41,316 9 32E 7/15/1995 3/30/2010 14.7 1 9 41,317 9 32E 4/17/1995 3/30/2010 15.0 1 9 41,793 104 41A 12/22/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 41,794 104 41A 6/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 41,795 104 41A 7/14/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 41,796 104 41A 1/20/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 41,797 104 41A 5/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 9 41,798 104 41A 5/1/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 41,799 104 41A 5/5/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 41,800 104 41A 8/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 41,801 104 41A 11/7/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,802 104 41A 11/4/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 4

Page 86: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 70

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,803 104 41A 1/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 41,804 104 41A 11/4/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,805 104 41A 8/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 41,806 104 41A 3/8/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 41,807 104 41A 2/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 41,808 104 41A 5/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 41,809 104 41A 12/27/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 41,810 105 41A 10/18/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 41,811 105 41A 3/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 41,812 105 41A 5/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 41,813 105 41A 12/28/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 41,814 105 41A 1/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 41,815 105 41A 6/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 41,816 105 41A 9/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.0 0 9 41,817 105 41A 5/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 41,818 105 41A 7/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 9 41,819 105 41A 1/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 9 41,820 105 41A 8/24/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 41,821 105 41A 1/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 41,822 105 41A 12/18/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 9 41,823 107 41A 10/25/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 41,824 107 41A 12/12/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 41,825 107 41A 8/28/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 41,826 107 41A 12/25/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 41,827 107 41A 4/8/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 41,828 107 41A 4/1/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 41,829 107 41A 11/8/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 41,830 107 41A 2/20/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 41,831 107 41A 9/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 41,832 107 41A 4/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 41,833 107 41A 4/8/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 41,834 107 41A 4/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 41,835 107 41A 4/20/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 41,836 107 41A 11/7/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,837 107 41A 11/9/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,838 107 41A 6/30/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 41,839 107 41A 10/27/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,840 107 41A 10/20/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,841 107 41A 10/18/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,842 109 41A 1/8/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 41,843 109 41A 11/15/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 41,844 109 41A 7/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 41,845 109 41A 6/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 9 41,846 109 41A 7/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 9 41,847 109 41A 3/10/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 41,848 109 41A 11/12/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 41,849 109 41A 7/1/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 9 41,850 109 41A 10/31/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 41,851 109 41A 11/15/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 41,852 109 41A 6/17/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 9 4

Page 87: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 71

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,853 109 41A 7/15/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 41,854 109 41A 3/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 43,503 23 32G 4/17/1995 4/14/2010 15.0 1 9 43,561 35 30E 1/31/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 0 9 43,562 35 30E 2/3/1996 4/9/2010 14.2 0 9 43,563 35 30E 4/27/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 0 9 43,564 35 30E 4/29/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 0 9 43,565 35 30E 1/2/1995 4/9/2010 15.3 0 9 43,566 35 30E 2/18/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 43,567 35 30E 7/13/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 0 9 43,568 35 30E 11/6/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 43,569 35 30E 5/5/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 1 9 44,428 38 32D 5/14/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 0 9 44,429 38 32D 5/12/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 1 9 44,430 38 32D 8/5/1994 3/22/2010 15.6 1 9 44,431 38 32D 3/30/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 1 9 44,432 38 32D 6/5/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 1 9 44,433 38 32D 12/24/1994 3/22/2010 15.2 1 9 44,434 38 32D 9/21/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 44,435 38 32D 3/18/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 1 9 44,436 38 32D 2/9/1994 3/22/2010 16.1 1 9 44,569 5 32B 6/6/1995 3/18/2010 14.8 0 9 44,570 5 32B 6/29/1995 3/18/2010 14.7 0 9 44,571 5 32B 3/23/1995 3/18/2010 15.0 0 9 44,572 5 32B 10/21/1994 3/18/2010 15.4 0 9 44,573 5 32B 6/28/1994 3/18/2010 15.7 0 9 44,574 5 32B 11/19/1994 3/18/2010 15.3 1 9 44,575 5 32B 12/10/1994 3/18/2010 15.3 1 9 44,576 5 32B 8/23/1994 3/18/2010 15.6 1 9 44,837 21 30F 11/28/1991 10/15/2010 18.9 0 9 44,838 21 30F 6/16/1992 10/15/2010 18.3 0 9 44,839 21 30F 3/20/1992 10/15/2010 18.6 0 9 44,840 21 30F 11/8/1991 10/15/2010 18.9 0 9 44,841 21 30F 11/18/1995 5/3/2010 14.5 0 9 44,842 21 30F 8/28/1995 5/3/2010 14.7 0 9 44,843 21 30F 7/8/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 44,844 21 30F 11/6/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 0 9 44,845 21 30F 5/8/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 9 44,846 21 30F 6/30/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 44,847 21 30F 4/4/1992 10/15/2010 18.5 1 9 44,848 21 30F 3/25/1992 10/15/2010 18.6 1 9 44,849 21 30F 10/15/2010 1 9 44,850 21 30F 7/22/1994 5/3/2010 15.8 1 9 44,851 21 30F 4/10/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 44,852 21 30F 3/24/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 44,853 21 30F 10/15/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 1 9 44,854 27 30F 6/28/1992 11/3/2010 18.3 0 9 44,855 27 30F 12/28/1994 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 44,856 27 30F 6/28/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 44,857 27 30F 12/13/1994 5/3/2010 15.4 0 9 4

Page 88: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 72

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,858 27 30F 9/18/1991 11/3/2010 19.1 1 9 44,859 27 30F 6/3/1992 11/3/2010 18.4 1 9 44,860 27 30F 4/12/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 44,861 27 30F 8/26/1995 5/3/2010 14.7 1 9 44,986 39 30I 2/15/1996 8/6/2010 14.5 1 9 44,987 39 30I 2/15/1996 8/6/2010 14.5 1 9 44,988 39 30I 8/29/1996 8/6/2010 13.9 1 9 44,989 39 30I 2/26/1995 4/14/2010 15.1 1 9 46,110 26 32K 1/21/1995 4/29/2010 15.3 0 9 46,111 26 32K 2/14/1995 4/29/2010 15.2 0 9 46,112 26 32K 8/26/1994 4/29/2010 15.7 0 9 46,113 26 32K 5/9/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 1 9 46,114 26 32K 3/2/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 9 46,115 50 32K 5/27/1994 5/5/2010 15.9 0 9 46,116 50 32K 4/25/1995 5/5/2010 15.0 0 9 46,117 50 32K 5/9/1994 5/5/2010 16.0 0 9 46,118 50 32K 7/20/1994 5/5/2010 15.8 0 9 46,119 50 32K 12/1/1994 5/5/2010 15.4 1 9 46,120 50 32K 8/11/1994 5/5/2010 15.7 1 9 44 15 32L 8/2/1995 5/7/2010 14.8 0 9 55 15 32L 2/16/1995 5/7/2010 15.2 0 9 56 15 32L 1/27/1995 5/7/2010 15.3 1 9 57 15 32L 3/4/1995 5/7/2010 15.2 1 9 5180 30 30B 2/22/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 5181 30 30B 9/26/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 0 9 5182 30 30B 3/26/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 0 9 5183 30 30B 10/25/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 0 9 5184 30 30B 3/14/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 5185 30 30B 11/2/1991 9/2/2006 14.8 0 9 5186 30 30B 8/18/1992 9/2/2006 14.0 0 9 5187 30 30B 7/26/1992 9/2/2006 14.1 0 9 5188 30 30B 6/8/1995 3/24/2010 14.8 0 9 5189 30 30B 4/1/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 0 9 5190 30 30B 11/19/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 0 9 5191 30 30B 6/23/1995 3/24/2010 14.8 0 9 5192 30 30B 4/30/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 0 9 5193 30 30B 9/8/1994 3/24/2010 15.5 0 9 5194 30 30B 6/11/1991 9/2/2006 15.2 1 9 5195 30 30B 8/21/1992 9/2/2006 14.0 1 9 5196 30 30B 2/28/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 1 9 5197 30 30B 7/25/1992 9/2/2006 14.1 1 9 5198 30 30B 1/14/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 1 9 5199 30 30B 9/2/2006 1 9 5200 30 30B 9/17/1991 9/2/2006 15.0 1 9 5201 30 30B 7/9/1991 9/2/2006 15.2 1 9 5202 30 30B 1/16/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 1 9 5203 30 30B 10/4/1994 3/24/2010 15.5 1 9 5204 30 30B 10/19/1994 3/24/2010 15.4 1 9 5205 30 30B 10/9/1994 3/24/2010 15.5 1 9 5206 30 30B 12/25/1994 3/24/2010 15.2 1 9 5

Page 89: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 73

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

207 30 30B 8/2/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 1 9 5208 30 30B 4/25/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 1 9 5209 30 30B 8/12/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 1 9 5210 30 30B 8/13/1994 3/24/2010 15.6 1 9 5211 30 30B 10/30/1994 3/24/2010 15.4 1 9 5212 30 30B 3/24/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 1 9 5213 30 30B 5/9/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 1 9 51,222 55 30J 9/16/1995 11/8/2010 15.1 0 9 51,223 55 30J 11/7/1995 11/8/2010 15.0 0 9 51,224 55 30J 7/19/1996 11/8/2010 14.3 1 9 51,225 55 30J 11/22/1995 11/8/2010 15.0 1 9 51,855 104 41A 3/26/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 51,856 104 41A 7/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 51,857 104 41A 7/7/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 51,858 104 41A 12/29/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 51,859 104 41A 10/16/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 51,860 104 41A 12/27/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 51,861 104 41A 12/3/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 51,862 104 41A 1/25/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 51,863 104 41A 8/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 9 51,864 104 41A 7/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 51,865 104 41A 5/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 51,866 104 41A 9/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 51,867 104 41A 3/15/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 51,868 104 41A 1/14/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 51,869 104 41A 9/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 51,870 104 41A 8/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 51,871 104 41A 8/6/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 51,872 105 41A 10/15/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 51,873 105 41A 5/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 51,874 105 41A 1/7/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 51,875 105 41A 7/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 51,876 105 41A 8/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 9 51,877 105 41A 3/20/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 51,878 105 41A 7/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 51,879 105 41A 10/11/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 51,880 105 41A 5/31/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 51,881 105 41A 10/29/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 51,882 105 41A 9/12/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 51,883 105 41A 11/4/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 51,884 105 41A 4/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 51,885 105 41A 11/22/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 51,886 107 41A 9/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 51,887 107 41A 12/3/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 51,888 107 41A 7/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 51,889 107 41A 9/17/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 51,890 107 41A 7/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 51,891 107 41A 6/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 9 51,892 107 41A 4/2/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 51,893 107 41A 8/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 5

Page 90: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 74

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,894 107 41A 5/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 51,895 107 41A 2/11/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 51,896 107 41A 6/6/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 51,897 107 41A 1/31/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 51,898 109 41A 4/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 51,899 109 41A 1/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 51,900 109 41A 11/1/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 51,901 109 41A 3/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 51,902 109 41A 2/26/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 51,903 109 41A 10/21/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 51,904 109 41A 5/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 51,905 109 41A 10/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 51,906 109 41A 6/30/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 51,907 109 41A 5/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 51,908 110 41A 9/6/1992 9/20/2006 14.0 1 9 53,504 23 32G 7/14/1995 4/14/2010 14.8 0 9 53,505 23 32G 12/8/1994 4/14/2010 15.3 0 9 53,506 23 32G 9/7/1994 4/14/2010 15.6 1 9 53,507 23 32G 6/15/1995 4/14/2010 14.8 1 9 53,570 35 30E 3/15/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 53,571 35 30E 4/28/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 0 9 53,572 35 30E 3/10/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 53,573 35 30E 3/4/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 53,574 35 30E 6/27/1995 4/9/2010 14.8 0 9 53,575 35 30E 2/20/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 53,576 35 30E 1/30/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 0 9 53,577 35 30E 10/18/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 0 9 53,578 35 30E 7/20/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 0 9 53,579 35 30E 9/25/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 0 9 53,580 35 30E 2/22/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 53,581 35 30E 7/7/1995 4/9/2010 14.8 1 9 53,582 35 30E 9/18/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 1 9 53,583 35 30E 2/16/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 1 9 53,584 35 30E 7/13/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 1 9 53,585 35 30E 8/15/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 1 9 53,586 35 30E 12/28/1994 4/9/2010 15.3 1 9 53,587 35 30E 11/20/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 54,437 38 32D 11/8/1994 3/22/2010 15.4 0 9 54,438 38 32D 4/25/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 0 9 54,439 38 32D 2/13/1995 3/22/2010 15.1 0 9 54,440 38 32D 3/31/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 0 9 54,441 38 32D 12/20/1994 3/22/2010 15.3 1 9 54,442 38 32D 3/2/1995 3/22/2010 15.1 1 9 54,443 38 32D 10/4/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 54,444 38 32D 3/28/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 1 9 54,445 38 32D 8/18/1994 3/22/2010 15.6 1 9 54,446 38 32D 5/4/1994 3/22/2010 15.9 1 9 54,577 5 32B 8/29/1995 3/18/2010 14.6 0 9 54,578 5 32B 10/26/1994 3/18/2010 15.4 0 9 54,579 5 32B 5/8/1995 3/18/2010 14.9 0 9 5

Page 91: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 75

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,580 5 32B 10/4/1994 3/18/2010 15.5 0 9 54,581 5 32B 12/25/1994 3/18/2010 15.2 1 9 54,582 5 32B 5/22/1995 3/18/2010 14.8 1 9 54,583 5 32B 1/3/1995 3/18/2010 15.2 1 9 54,584 5 32B 6/17/1994 3/18/2010 15.8 1 9 54,862 21 30F 9/18/1991 10/15/2010 19.1 0 9 54,863 21 30F 10/19/1990 10/15/2010 20.0 0 9 54,864 21 30F 1/6/1995 5/3/2010 15.3 0 9 54,865 21 30F 9/19/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 0 9 54,866 21 30F 7/25/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 54,867 21 30F 8/24/1992 10/15/2010 18.1 1 9 54,868 21 30F 6/23/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 1 9 54,869 21 30F 10/28/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 1 9 54,870 21 30F 12/19/1993 5/3/2010 16.4 1 9 54,871 27 30F 4/14/1992 11/3/2010 18.6 0 9 54,872 27 30F 7/22/1995 5/3/2010 14.8 0 9 54,873 27 30F 5/16/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 0 9 54,874 27 30F 1/11/1997 5/3/2010 13.3 0 9 54,875 27 30F 6/3/1995 5/3/2010 14.9 1 9 54,990 39 30I 5/19/1996 8/6/2010 14.2 0 9 54,991 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 9 54,992 39 30I 12/21/1994 4/14/2010 15.3 1 9 55,834 18 30D 6/6/1995 4/30/2010 14.9 1 9 56,121 26 32K 10/24/1994 4/29/2010 15.5 0 9 56,122 26 32K 2/14/1995 4/29/2010 15.2 1 9 56,123 50 32K 10/12/1994 5/5/2010 15.6 0 9 56,124 50 32K 4/19/1995 5/5/2010 15.0 0 9 56,125 50 32K 4/15/1994 5/5/2010 16.1 1 9 56,126 50 32K 7/20/1994 5/5/2010 15.8 1 9 56,127 50 32K 9/11/1994 5/5/2010 15.6 1 9 56,128 50 32K 6/23/1994 5/5/2010 15.9 1 9 58 15 32L 5/22/1995 5/7/2010 15.0 0 9 6214 30 30B 12/4/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 6215 30 30B 12/22/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 6216 30 30B 2/5/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 0 9 6217 30 30B 12/5/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 6218 30 30B 9/19/1994 3/24/2010 15.5 0 9 6219 30 30B 1/21/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 6220 30 30B 1/7/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 6221 30 30B 6/9/1995 3/24/2010 14.8 0 9 6222 30 30B 5/17/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 0 9 6223 30 30B 3/17/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 0 9 6224 30 30B 1/10/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 6225 30 30B 1/22/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 0 9 6226 30 30B 2/2/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 0 9 6227 30 30B 4/26/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 1 9 6228 30 30B 2/25/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 1 9 6229 30 30B 1/8/1992 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 6230 30 30B 5/23/1992 9/2/2006 14.3 1 9 6231 30 30B 2/5/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 1 9 6

Page 92: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 76

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

232 30 30B 12/27/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 6233 30 30B 12/18/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 6234 30 30B 3/27/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 1 9 6235 30 30B 6/29/1991 9/2/2006 15.2 1 9 6236 30 30B 8/21/1992 9/2/2006 14.0 1 9 6237 30 30B 1/3/1995 3/24/2010 15.2 1 9 6238 30 30B 3/17/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 1 9 6239 30 30B 9/28/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 9 6240 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 61,226 55 30J 3/15/1995 11/8/2010 15.7 0 9 61,227 55 30J 5/19/1996 11/8/2010 14.5 0 9 61,228 55 30J 7/25/1996 11/8/2010 14.3 0 9 61,229 55 30J 7/24/1995 11/8/2010 15.3 1 9 61,230 55 30J 11/18/1995 11/8/2010 15.0 1 9 61,909 104 41A 6/5/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 61,910 104 41A 6/30/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 61,911 104 41A 2/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 61,912 104 41A 10/16/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 61,913 104 41A 10/11/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 61,914 104 41A 2/15/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 61,915 104 41A 3/19/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 61,916 104 41A 6/19/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 61,917 104 41A 5/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 61,918 104 41A 3/10/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 61,919 104 41A 9/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 61,920 104 41A 10/24/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 61,921 105 41A 2/1/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 61,922 105 41A 9/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 61,923 105 41A 12/4/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 61,924 105 41A 3/7/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 61,925 105 41A 12/18/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 61,926 105 41A 8/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 61,927 105 41A 2/17/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 61,928 105 41A 4/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 61,929 105 41A 12/7/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 61,930 105 41A 8/31/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 61,931 105 41A 3/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 61,932 105 41A 10/4/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 61,933 105 41A 7/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 9 61,934 105 41A 2/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 9 61,935 105 41A 11/29/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 61,936 107 41A 1/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 61,937 107 41A 10/27/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 61,938 107 41A 1/20/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 61,939 107 41A 8/30/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 61,940 107 41A 3/10/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 61,941 107 41A 1/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 61,942 107 41A 5/26/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 61,943 107 41A 9/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 61,944 107 41A 5/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 6

Page 93: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 77

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,945 107 41A 10/6/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 61,946 107 41A 11/7/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 61,947 107 41A 1/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 61,948 107 41A 9/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 9 61,949 107 41A 1/12/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 61,950 107 41A 9/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 61,951 109 41A 1/24/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 61,952 109 41A 6/17/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 0 9 61,953 109 41A 1/20/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 61,954 109 41A 4/22/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 61,955 109 41A 10/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 61,956 109 41A 4/26/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 61,957 109 41A 8/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 9 61,958 109 41A 4/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 61,959 109 41A 12/29/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 61,960 109 41A 4/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 9 61,961 109 41A 2/27/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 61,962 109 41A 11/26/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 63,508 23 32G 10/28/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 0 9 63,509 23 32G 8/16/1994 4/14/2010 15.7 0 9 63,510 23 32G 12/12/1994 4/14/2010 15.3 0 9 63,511 23 32G 12/3/1994 4/14/2010 15.4 0 9 63,512 23 32G 6/11/1994 4/14/2010 15.8 0 9 63,513 23 32G 6/27/1995 4/14/2010 14.8 0 9 63,514 23 32G 6/27/1994 4/14/2010 15.8 0 9 63,515 23 32G 10/26/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 1 9 63,516 23 32G 5/16/1995 4/14/2010 14.9 1 9 63,517 23 32G 10/1/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 1 9 63,588 35 30E 7/19/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 0 9 63,589 35 30E 9/18/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 0 9 63,590 35 30E 5/7/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 0 9 63,591 35 30E 5/26/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 0 9 63,592 35 30E 3/19/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 63,593 35 30E 4/10/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 0 9 63,594 35 30E 3/28/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 0 9 63,595 35 30E 6/30/1994 4/9/2010 15.8 1 9 63,596 35 30E 11/17/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 63,597 35 30E 12/3/1994 4/9/2010 15.3 1 9 63,598 35 30E 2/19/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 1 9 63,599 35 30E 5/10/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 1 9 63,600 35 30E 9/8/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 1 9 64,447 38 32D 3/31/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 1 9 64,585 5 32B 12/29/1994 3/18/2010 15.2 0 9 64,586 5 32B 3/20/1995 3/18/2010 15.0 0 9 64,587 5 32B 8/21/1995 3/18/2010 14.6 0 9 64,588 5 32B 8/27/1994 3/18/2010 15.6 1 9 64,589 5 32B 2/5/1995 3/18/2010 15.1 1 9 64,590 5 32B 8/31/1994 3/18/2010 15.5 1 9 64,876 21 30F 6/4/1992 10/15/2010 18.4 1 9 64,877 21 30F 4/15/1995 5/3/2010 15.0 1 9 6

Page 94: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 78

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,878 27 30F 8/5/1992 11/3/2010 18.2 0 9 64,879 27 30F 10/8/1995 5/3/2010 14.6 0 9 64,880 27 30F 3/18/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 64,881 27 30F 3/18/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 66,129 26 32K 11/8/1994 4/29/2010 15.5 0 9 66,130 26 32K 8/30/1994 4/29/2010 15.7 1 9 66,131 26 32K 4/14/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 1 9 66,132 26 32K 9/12/1994 4/29/2010 15.6 1 9 66,133 26 32K 4/7/1995 4/29/2010 15.1 1 9 66,134 50 32K 3/22/1995 5/5/2010 15.1 0 9 66,135 50 32K 6/23/1993 5/5/2010 16.9 0 9 66,136 50 32K 12/12/1994 5/5/2010 15.4 1 9 66,137 50 32K 8/15/1994 5/5/2010 15.7 1 9 66,138 50 32K 7/12/1995 5/5/2010 14.8 1 9 66,139 50 32K 7/6/1994 5/5/2010 15.8 1 9 69 15 32L 9/28/1994 5/7/2010 15.6 0 9 710 15 32L 8/3/1995 5/7/2010 14.8 0 9 711 15 32L 10/18/1995 5/7/2010 14.6 1 9 7241 30 30B 2/22/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 7242 30 30B 12/2/1991 9/2/2006 14.8 0 9 7243 30 30B 10/5/1991 9/2/2006 14.9 0 9 7244 30 30B 4/7/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 0 9 7245 30 30B 5/8/1992 9/2/2006 14.3 0 9 7246 30 30B 2/5/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 0 9 7247 30 30B 7/19/1994 3/24/2010 15.7 0 9 7248 30 30B 8/28/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 0 9 7249 30 30B 2/9/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 1 9 7250 30 30B 4/21/1991 9/2/2006 15.4 1 9 7251 30 30B 6/23/1995 3/24/2010 14.8 1 9 7252 30 30B 3/22/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 1 9 7253 30 30B 12/13/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 1 9 7254 30 30B 9/4/1994 3/24/2010 15.6 1 9 7255 30 30B 3/17/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 1 9 7256 30 30B 4/15/1995 3/24/2010 14.9 1 9 7257 30 30B 2/12/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 1 9 7258 30 30B 3/13/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 9 7259 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 7260 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 7261 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 71,231 54 30J 10/16/1995 11/8/2010 15.1 1 9 71,232 55 30J 2/26/1996 11/8/2010 14.7 0 9 71,233 55 30J 5/17/1996 11/8/2010 14.5 1 9 71,234 55 30J 6/13/1995 11/8/2010 15.4 1 9 71,235 55 30J 6/17/1996 11/8/2010 14.4 1 9 71,318 9 32E 10/14/1994 3/30/2010 15.5 0 9 71,963 104 41A 10/11/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 71,964 104 41A 3/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 71,965 104 41A 4/18/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 71,966 104 41A 2/29/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 71,967 104 41A 2/6/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 7

Page 95: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 79

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,968 105 41A 4/24/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 71,969 105 41A 12/31/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 71,970 105 41A 10/17/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 9 71,971 105 41A 6/1/1992 9/20/2006 14.3 1 9 71,972 105 41A 3/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 1 9 71,973 105 41A 7/9/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 1 9 71,974 105 41A 11/27/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 71,975 107 41A 9/24/1992 9/20/2006 14.0 0 9 71,976 107 41A 9/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 71,977 107 41A 4/7/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 71,978 107 41A 7/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 9 71,979 107 41A 12/28/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 71,980 107 41A 8/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 71,981 107 41A 10/12/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 71,982 107 41A 10/11/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 71,983 107 41A 7/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 9 71,984 107 41A 2/25/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 71,985 107 41A 8/18/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 71,986 109 41A 7/15/1992 9/20/2006 14.2 0 9 71,987 109 41A 2/23/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 71,988 109 41A 3/16/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 9 71,989 109 41A 9/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.0 1 9 71,990 109 41A 11/5/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 71,991 109 41A 3/1/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 9 71,992 109 41A 11/24/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 71,993 109 41A 8/14/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 1 9 73,518 23 32G 7/1/1995 4/14/2010 14.8 0 9 73,519 23 32G 9/15/1994 4/14/2010 15.6 0 9 73,520 23 32G 3/14/1995 4/14/2010 15.1 0 9 73,521 23 32G 4/17/1995 4/14/2010 15.0 0 9 73,522 23 32G 7/17/1994 4/14/2010 15.7 0 9 73,523 23 32G 4/20/1995 4/14/2010 15.0 1 9 73,524 23 32G 10/29/1994 4/14/2010 15.5 1 9 73,601 35 30E 6/27/1995 4/9/2010 14.8 0 9 73,602 35 30E 6/21/1995 4/9/2010 14.8 0 9 73,603 35 30E 2/23/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 73,604 35 30E 10/4/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 0 9 73,605 35 30E 5/17/1994 4/9/2010 15.9 0 9 73,606 35 30E 2/16/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 73,607 35 30E 10/27/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 0 9 73,608 35 30E 4/18/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 0 9 73,609 35 30E 7/17/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 0 9 73,610 35 30E 6/16/1994 4/9/2010 15.8 1 9 73,611 35 30E 7/25/1994 4/9/2010 15.7 1 9 73,612 35 30E 7/22/1994 4/9/2010 15.7 1 9 73,613 35 30E 1/10/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 73,614 35 30E 8/11/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 1 9 73,615 35 30E 7/26/1995 4/9/2010 14.7 1 9 73,616 35 30E 2/10/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 73,617 35 30E 2/7/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 7

Page 96: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 80

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,618 35 30E 5/29/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 1 9 73,619 35 30E 2/27/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 1 9 73,620 35 30E 6/24/1994 4/9/2010 15.8 1 9 73,621 35 30E 11/15/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 73,622 35 30E 11/30/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 74,448 38 32D 9/10/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 74,449 38 32D 9/6/1994 3/22/2010 15.5 1 9 74,450 38 32D 10/20/1994 3/22/2010 15.4 1 9 74,591 5 32B 1/31/1995 3/18/2010 15.1 0 9 74,882 21 30F 11/18/1991 10/15/2010 18.9 0 9 74,883 21 30F 10/26/1994 5/3/2010 15.5 0 9 74,884 21 30F 2/16/1995 5/3/2010 15.2 1 9 74,885 27 30F 9/9/1994 5/3/2010 15.6 0 9 74,886 27 30F 10/3/1991 11/3/2010 19.1 1 9 74,887 27 30F 3/11/1995 5/3/2010 15.1 1 9 76,140 26 32K 3/27/1995 4/29/2010 15.1 0 9 76,141 26 32K 12/27/1994 4/29/2010 15.3 0 9 76,142 26 32K 8/3/1994 4/29/2010 15.7 1 9 76,143 50 32K 3/21/1995 5/5/2010 15.1 0 9 76,144 50 32K 3/21/1995 5/5/2010 15.1 0 9 76,145 50 32K 2/23/1995 5/5/2010 15.2 1 9 712 15 32L 8/25/1995 5/7/2010 14.7 0 9 813 15 32L 7/10/1995 5/7/2010 14.8 1 9 814 15 32L 1/14/1995 5/7/2010 15.3 1 9 8262 30 30B 1/4/1992 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 8263 30 30B 2/7/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 0 9 8264 30 30B 11/10/1991 9/2/2006 14.8 0 9 8265 30 30B 3/10/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 0 9 8266 30 30B 2/19/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 0 9 8267 30 30B 5/28/1992 9/2/2006 14.3 1 9 8268 30 30B 3/9/1992 9/2/2006 14.5 1 9 8269 30 30B 4/1/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 1 9 8270 30 30B 1/7/1992 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 8271 30 30B 3/10/1995 3/24/2010 15.0 1 9 8272 30 30B 6/2/1994 3/24/2010 15.8 1 9 8273 30 30B 12/22/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 1 9 8274 30 30B 2/24/1995 3/24/2010 15.1 1 9 8275 30 30B 9/2/2006 9 81,319 9 32E 8/2/1994 3/30/2010 15.7 0 9 86,430 47 32J 10/6/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 9 81,994 104 41A 12/24/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 81,995 105 41A 6/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 9 81,996 105 41A 1/7/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 0 9 81,997 105 41A 1/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.7 1 9 81,998 105 41A 8/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 81,999 107 41A 10/5/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 9 82,000 107 41A 12/20/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 82,001 107 41A 3/1/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 1 9 82,002 107 41A 7/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 9 82,003 109 41A 4/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 8

Page 97: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 81

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,004 109 41A 12/19/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 82,005 109 41A 4/10/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 1 9 83,525 23 32G 11/13/1994 4/14/2010 15.4 1 9 83,623 35 30E 12/26/1994 4/9/2010 15.3 0 9 83,624 35 30E 11/22/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 0 9 83,625 35 30E 2/19/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 83,626 35 30E 1/23/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 83,627 35 30E 9/11/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 1 9 83,628 35 30E 10/31/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 83,629 35 30E 5/22/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 1 9 83,630 35 30E 4/23/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 1 9 83,631 35 30E 11/3/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 83,632 35 30E 2/10/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 1 9 83,633 35 30E 11/27/1994 4/9/2010 15.4 1 9 84,451 38 32D 5/3/1995 3/22/2010 14.9 0 9 84,452 38 32D 7/5/1995 3/22/2010 14.7 0 9 84,453 38 32D 8/20/1995 3/22/2010 14.6 1 9 84,454 38 32D 3/8/1995 3/22/2010 15.0 1 9 84,592 5 32B 4/11/1995 3/18/2010 14.9 0 9 84,593 5 32B 7/21/1994 3/18/2010 15.7 1 9 84,594 5 32B 4/11/1995 3/18/2010 14.9 1 9 84,993 39 30I 12/26/1994 4/14/2010 15.3 1 9 86,146 50 32K 8/15/1994 5/5/2010 15.7 1 9 815 15 32L 1/4/1995 5/7/2010 15.3 0 9 9276 30 30B 11/2/1991 9/2/2006 14.8 0 9 9277 30 30B 12/6/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 9278 30 30B 9/7/1995 3/24/2010 14.5 0 9 9279 30 30B 4/12/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 1 9 9280 30 30B 12/28/1991 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 9281 30 30B 11/7/1994 3/24/2010 15.4 1 9 9282 30 30B 11/17/1994 3/24/2010 15.3 1 9 9283 30 30B 8/22/1995 3/24/2010 14.6 1 9 91,236 55 30J 2/27/1996 11/8/2010 14.7 0 9 91,237 55 30J 8/31/1995 11/8/2010 15.2 1 9 91,238 55 30J 12/18/1995 11/8/2010 14.9 1 9 92,006 104 41A 10/10/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 92,007 104 41A 9/4/1992 9/20/2006 14.0 1 9 92,008 104 41A 3/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 9 92,009 105 41A 10/17/1992 9/20/2006 13.9 0 9 92,010 107 41A 10/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 9 92,011 109 41A 8/21/1992 9/20/2006 14.1 0 9 93,634 35 30E 2/9/1995 4/9/2010 15.2 0 9 93,635 35 30E 3/4/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 1 9 93,636 35 30E 12/30/1994 4/9/2010 15.3 1 9 94,595 5 32B 5/30/1995 3/18/2010 14.8 1 9 96,147 26 32K 1/17/1995 4/29/2010 15.3 0 9 96,148 26 32K 8/7/1995 4/29/2010 14.7 1 9 96,149 50 32K 11/15/1994 5/5/2010 15.5 1 9 9284 30 30B 6/17/1992 9/2/2006 14.2 0 9 10285 30 30B 9/6/1991 9/2/2006 15.0 0 9 10

Page 98: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 82

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

286 30 30B 1/4/1992 9/2/2006 14.7 1 9 10287 30 30B 1/29/1992 9/2/2006 14.6 1 9 101,320 9 32E 7/31/1995 3/30/2010 14.7 1 9 102,012 103 41A 11/4/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 102,013 104 41A 12/6/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 0 9 102,014 104 41A 5/6/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 9 102,015 104 41A 11/14/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 102,016 105 41A 11/30/1992 9/20/2006 13.8 1 9 102,017 107 41A 10/9/1992 9/20/2006 13.9 0 9 102,018 107 41A 2/13/1992 9/20/2006 14.6 0 9 102,019 107 41A 10/30/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 1 9 103,526 23 32G 1/23/1996 4/14/2010 14.2 0 9 103,527 23 32G 1/23/1995 4/14/2010 15.2 1 9 103,528 23 32G 6/1/1994 4/14/2010 15.9 1 9 103,637 35 30E 3/17/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 106,150 26 32K 2/20/1995 4/29/2010 15.2 0 9 106,151 26 32K 7/13/1994 4/29/2010 15.8 1 9 106,152 26 32K 8/13/1994 4/29/2010 15.7 1 9 106,153 50 32K 11/21/1994 5/5/2010 15.5 1 9 10288 30 30B 1/4/1992 9/2/2006 14.7 0 9 11289 30 30B 4/25/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 1 9 112,020 107 41A 7/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 9 112,021 107 41A 1/29/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 9 113,638 35 30E 3/2/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 0 9 113,639 35 30E 10/26/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 1 9 113,640 35 30E 3/20/1995 4/9/2010 15.1 1 9 114,596 5 32B 11/3/1994 3/18/2010 15.4 1 9 114,597 5 32B 6/25/1994 3/18/2010 15.7 1 9 116,154 50 32K 1/20/1995 5/5/2010 15.3 1 9 111,570 14 32H 10/1/1994 4/30/2010 15.6 0 9 122,022 102 41A 5/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 9 122,023 107 41A 12/17/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 9 123,641 35 30E 6/3/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 1 9 12290 30 30B 11/29/1991 9/2/2006 14.8 0 9 13291 30 30B 4/3/1992 9/2/2006 14.4 0 9 13680 101 41B 8/23/1990 5/29/2006 15.8 0 10 0681 101 41B 11/17/1989 5/29/2006 16.5 0 10 0682 101 41B 8/17/1990 5/29/2006 15.8 0 10 0683 101 41B 8/29/1990 9/19/2005 15.1 0 10 0684 101 41B 7/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 10 0685 101 41B 12/12/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 0686 101 41B 3/11/1990 5/29/2006 16.2 1 10 01,239 54 30J 2/12/1995 11/8/2010 15.7 0 10 02,024 106 41A 4/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 02,025 108 41A 8/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 10 02,026 108 41A 10/30/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 02,027 108 41A 1/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 02,028 108 41A 12/10/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 02,029 109 41A 12/11/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 03,642 35 30E 2/22/1994 4/9/2010 16.1 1 10 0

Page 99: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 83

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,777 124 41F 12/26/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 04,145 36 30H 11/16/1993 5/13/2010 16.5 0 10 04,455 20 32D 8/23/1993 3/22/2010 16.6 0 10 04,888 27 30F 12/15/1990 11/3/2010 19.9 1 10 04,994 39 30I 11/3/1994 8/6/2010 15.8 0 10 04,995 39 30I 5/13/1995 8/6/2010 15.2 0 10 04,996 39 30I 2/7/1995 8/6/2010 15.5 0 10 04,997 39 30I 7/23/1995 8/6/2010 15.0 0 10 04,998 39 30I 11/12/1994 8/6/2010 15.7 1 10 04,999 39 30I 3/19/1992 8/6/2010 18.4 1 10 05,000 39 30I 1/25/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 1 10 05,001 39 30I 10/12/1994 8/6/2010 15.8 1 10 05,002 39 30I 11/30/1994 8/6/2010 15.7 1 10 05,003 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 10 05,004 39 30I 11/3/1994 8/6/2010 15.8 1 10 05,005 39 30I 3/1/1995 8/6/2010 15.4 1 10 05,006 39 30I 11/25/1995 8/6/2010 14.7 1 10 05,007 39 30I 4/14/2010 1 10 05,008 39 30I 4/14/2010 1 10 06,155 52 32K 12/14/1993 4/29/2010 16.4 1 10 06,156 52 32K 2/4/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 0348 114 41D 3/26/1989 8/31/2004 15.4 0 10 1349 121 41D 2/7/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 1687 101 41B 8/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 10 1688 101 41B 5/10/1990 5/29/2006 16.1 0 10 1689 101 41B 1/12/1989 9/13/2004 15.7 0 10 1690 101 41B 3/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 1691 101 41B 11/18/1989 9/19/2005 15.8 0 10 1692 101 41B 11/18/1989 5/29/2006 16.5 0 10 1693 101 41B 10/4/1988 5/27/2005 16.6 0 10 1694 101 41B 4/4/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 1695 101 41B 4/26/1990 9/19/2005 15.4 0 10 1696 101 41B 4/26/1990 5/29/2006 16.1 0 10 1697 101 41B 8/3/1990 9/19/2005 15.1 1 10 1698 101 41B 7/1/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 1699 101 41B 8/15/1990 9/19/2005 15.1 1 10 1700 101 41B 9/14/1989 9/19/2005 16.0 1 10 1701 101 41B 4/7/1990 5/29/2006 16.1 1 10 1702 101 41B 9/8/1989 9/19/2005 16.0 1 10 1703 101 41B 9/8/1989 5/29/2006 16.7 1 10 11,321 9 32E 4/2/1992 3/30/2010 18.0 1 10 11,468 2 30G 7/24/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 0 10 16,565 48 32J 1/19/1994 5/3/2010 16.3 0 10 11,606 7 32C 12/9/1993 3/16/2010 16.3 1 10 12,030 100 41A 9/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 12,031 100 41A 12/9/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 12,032 100 41A 1/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 12,033 100 41A 3/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 12,034 100 41A 1/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 12,035 100 41A 12/1/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 1

Page 100: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 84

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,036 100 41A 5/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 10 12,037 100 41A 8/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 12,038 100 41A 4/17/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 12,039 100 41A 7/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 12,040 100 41A 2/23/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 12,041 102 41A 10/18/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 12,042 103 41A 10/31/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 12,043 103 41A 7/25/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 12,044 103 41A 1/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 12,045 107 41A 5/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 12,046 108 41A 3/31/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 12,047 108 41A 5/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 12,048 108 41A 6/5/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 12,049 108 41A 11/9/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 12,050 108 41A 12/6/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 12,051 108 41A 5/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 10 12,052 108 41A 1/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 13,643 35 30E 12/21/1993 4/9/2010 16.3 0 10 13,644 35 30E 7/12/1993 4/9/2010 16.7 1 10 13,778 117 41F 8/22/1990 9/2/2005 15.0 0 10 13,779 124 41F 2/15/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 13,780 124 41F 6/8/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 14,146 36 30H 8/2/1995 11/11/2010 15.3 0 10 14,456 20 32D 5/13/1993 3/22/2010 16.9 0 10 14,457 20 32D 7/12/1993 3/22/2010 16.7 0 10 14,458 20 32D 8/14/1993 3/22/2010 16.6 1 10 14,459 20 32D 3/12/1994 3/22/2010 16.0 1 10 14,598 5 32B 2/5/1994 3/18/2010 16.1 0 10 14,889 27 30F 9/4/1990 11/3/2010 20.2 0 10 14,890 27 30F 12/10/1990 11/3/2010 19.9 0 10 14,891 27 30F 9/30/1991 11/3/2010 19.1 1 10 14,892 27 30F 3/23/1991 11/3/2010 19.6 1 10 15,009 39 30I 7/29/1994 8/6/2010 16.0 0 10 15,010 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 10 15,011 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 10 15,012 39 30I 3/29/1995 8/6/2010 15.4 0 10 15,013 39 30I 6/12/1995 8/6/2010 15.2 0 10 15,014 39 30I 10/10/1994 8/6/2010 15.8 0 10 15,015 39 30I 8/3/1995 8/6/2010 15.0 0 10 15,016 39 30I 2/20/1995 8/6/2010 15.5 0 10 15,017 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 10 15,018 39 30I 10/11/1993 8/6/2010 16.8 0 10 15,019 39 30I 8/9/1995 8/6/2010 15.0 0 10 15,020 39 30I 5/6/1995 8/6/2010 15.3 0 10 15,021 39 30I 6/18/1995 8/6/2010 15.1 0 10 15,022 39 30I 4/14/2010 0 10 15,023 39 30I 4/8/1994 4/14/2010 16.0 0 10 15,024 39 30I 10/20/1993 4/14/2010 16.5 0 10 15,025 39 30I 11/12/1993 4/14/2010 16.4 0 10 15,026 39 30I 1/22/1994 4/14/2010 16.2 0 10 1

Page 101: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 85

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,027 39 30I 8/4/1994 8/6/2010 16.0 1 10 15,028 39 30I 9/12/1994 8/6/2010 15.9 1 10 15,029 39 30I 2/28/1994 8/6/2010 16.4 1 10 15,030 39 30I 5/7/1995 8/6/2010 15.2 1 10 15,031 39 30I 2/3/1995 8/6/2010 15.5 1 10 15,032 39 30I 12/21/1994 8/6/2010 15.6 1 10 15,033 39 30I 3/8/1993 4/14/2010 17.1 1 10 15,034 39 30I 2/1/1994 4/14/2010 16.2 1 10 15,035 39 30I 4/14/2010 1 10 15,036 39 30I 4/14/2010 1 10 15,037 39 30I 10/4/1993 4/14/2010 16.5 1 10 16,157 52 32K 7/8/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 0 10 16,158 52 32K 8/5/1994 4/29/2010 15.7 0 10 16,159 52 32K 7/27/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 0 10 16,160 52 32K 9/25/1993 4/29/2010 16.6 0 10 16,161 52 32K 9/11/1993 4/29/2010 16.6 0 10 16,162 52 32K 6/14/1994 4/29/2010 15.9 0 10 16,163 52 32K 2/6/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 16,164 52 32K 4/25/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 1 10 16,165 52 32K 6/8/1993 4/29/2010 16.9 1 10 16,166 52 32K 2/5/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 16,167 52 32K 7/22/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 1 10 1292 30 30B 4/19/1991 9/2/2006 15.4 0 10 2350 121 41D 2/7/1990 5/25/2006 16.3 0 10 2351 121 41D 4/4/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 2352 121 41D 12/31/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 1 10 2704 101 41B 5/10/1990 9/19/2005 15.4 0 10 2705 101 41B 10/9/1989 5/29/2006 16.6 0 10 2706 101 41B 12/10/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 2707 101 41B 1/12/1989 5/27/2005 16.4 0 10 2708 101 41B 10/3/1989 5/29/2006 16.7 0 10 2709 101 41B 7/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 2710 101 41B 5/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 2711 101 41B 5/28/1990 9/19/2005 15.3 0 10 2712 101 41B 2/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 2713 101 41B 11/18/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 2714 101 41B 1/28/1990 9/19/2005 15.6 1 10 2715 101 41B 2/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 10 2716 101 41B 8/3/1990 5/29/2006 15.8 1 10 2717 101 41B 6/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 2718 101 41B 9/14/1989 5/29/2006 16.7 1 10 2719 101 41B 11/3/1989 9/19/2005 15.9 1 10 2720 101 41B 6/6/1989 5/27/2005 16.0 1 10 2721 101 41B 1/2/1989 5/27/2005 16.4 1 10 2722 101 41B 3/23/1987 9/13/2004 17.5 1 10 21,240 54 30J 10/19/1994 11/8/2010 16.1 0 10 21,241 54 30J 9/4/1993 11/8/2010 17.2 0 10 21,242 54 30J 8/4/1994 11/8/2010 16.3 0 10 21,243 54 30J 2/14/1994 11/8/2010 16.7 0 10 21,244 54 30J 8/8/1994 11/8/2010 16.3 1 10 2

Page 102: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 86

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,245 54 30J 8/20/1994 11/8/2010 16.2 1 10 21,246 54 30J 7/8/1994 11/8/2010 16.3 1 10 26,431 47 32J 7/26/1994 4/23/2010 15.7 0 10 26,432 47 32J 3/6/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 26,433 47 32J 4/24/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 1 10 26,566 48 32J 5/24/1994 5/3/2010 15.9 0 10 26,567 48 32J 6/28/1994 5/3/2010 15.8 0 10 21,607 7 32C 11/9/1993 3/16/2010 16.3 0 10 21,608 7 32C 1/25/1994 3/16/2010 16.1 0 10 21,609 7 32C 7/4/1994 3/16/2010 15.7 0 10 22,053 100 41A 4/28/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 10 22,054 100 41A 3/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 10 22,055 100 41A 10/24/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 22,056 100 41A 4/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 22,057 100 41A 12/17/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 22,058 100 41A 7/26/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 10 22,059 100 41A 8/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 10 22,060 100 41A 12/16/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 22,061 100 41A 10/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 22,062 100 41A 2/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 22,063 100 41A 8/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 22,064 100 41A 12/31/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 1 10 22,065 100 41A 4/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 10 22,066 102 41A 3/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 22,067 102 41A 1/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 22,068 102 41A 5/12/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 22,069 102 41A 4/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 22,070 102 41A 12/27/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 22,071 103 41A 1/23/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 22,072 103 41A 4/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 22,073 103 41A 3/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 22,074 103 41A 10/10/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 22,075 103 41A 10/23/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 22,076 103 41A 6/28/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 22,077 103 41A 2/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 22,078 103 41A 4/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 22,079 103 41A 8/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 10 22,080 104 41A 12/11/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 22,081 104 41A 2/5/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 22,082 107 41A 5/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 22,083 108 41A 11/15/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 22,084 108 41A 3/29/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 22,085 108 41A 8/31/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 10 22,086 108 41A 6/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 22,087 108 41A 6/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 22,088 108 41A 9/11/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 10 22,089 108 41A 9/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 22,090 108 41A 11/3/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 22,091 108 41A 4/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 22,092 108 41A 9/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 2

Page 103: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 87

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,093 108 41A 6/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 22,094 108 41A 1/23/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 22,095 108 41A 9/1/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 22,096 109 41A 6/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 22,097 109 41A 3/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 23,645 35 30E 6/7/1994 4/9/2010 15.8 0 10 23,781 116 41F 12/21/1989 9/25/2005 15.8 1 10 23,782 116 41F 1/9/1990 9/25/2005 15.7 1 10 23,783 124 41F 10/16/1989 2/20/2006 16.3 0 10 24,147 36 30H 10/14/1994 11/11/2010 16.1 0 10 24,148 36 30H 4/4/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 0 10 24,149 36 30H 5/30/1995 11/11/2010 15.5 1 10 24,150 36 30H 10/17/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 1 10 24,460 20 32D 5/23/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 0 10 24,461 20 32D 6/12/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 0 10 24,462 20 32D 10/19/1993 3/22/2010 16.4 0 10 24,463 20 32D 8/29/1993 3/22/2010 16.6 0 10 24,464 20 32D 12/13/1992 3/22/2010 17.3 1 10 24,893 21 30F 10/30/1990 10/15/2010 20.0 1 10 24,894 21 30F 4/20/1989 10/15/2010 21.5 1 10 24,895 27 30F 7/5/1990 11/3/2010 20.3 0 10 25,038 39 30I 2/4/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 0 10 25,039 39 30I 8/15/1995 8/6/2010 15.0 0 10 25,040 39 30I 4/5/1995 8/6/2010 15.3 0 10 25,041 39 30I 11/16/1994 8/6/2010 15.7 0 10 25,042 39 30I 6/3/1995 8/6/2010 15.2 0 10 25,043 39 30I 3/3/1994 8/6/2010 16.4 0 10 25,044 39 30I 3/31/1995 8/6/2010 15.4 0 10 25,045 39 30I 8/6/2010 8/6/2010 0.0 0 10 25,046 39 30I 11/2/1994 8/6/2010 15.8 0 10 25,047 39 30I 9/22/1995 8/6/2010 14.9 0 10 25,048 39 30I 5/20/1995 8/6/2010 15.2 0 10 25,049 39 30I 2/6/1994 4/14/2010 16.2 0 10 25,050 39 30I 4/14/2010 0 10 25,051 39 30I 4/24/1994 4/14/2010 16.0 0 10 25,052 39 30I 7/8/1994 4/14/2010 15.8 0 10 25,053 39 30I 11/1/1993 8/6/2010 16.8 1 10 25,054 39 30I 7/14/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 1 10 25,055 39 30I 12/7/1994 8/6/2010 15.7 1 10 25,056 39 30I 3/28/1995 8/6/2010 15.4 1 10 25,057 39 30I 6/15/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 1 10 25,058 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 10 25,059 39 30I 6/6/1996 8/6/2010 14.2 1 10 25,060 39 30I 4/14/2010 1 10 25,061 39 30I 6/18/1994 4/14/2010 15.8 1 10 26,168 52 32K 4/1/1994 4/29/2010 16.1 0 10 26,169 52 32K 2/8/1993 4/29/2010 17.2 0 10 26,170 52 32K 12/6/1993 4/29/2010 16.4 0 10 26,171 52 32K 8/23/1993 4/29/2010 16.7 0 10 26,172 52 32K 2/14/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 2

Page 104: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 88

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,173 52 32K 12/13/1993 4/29/2010 16.4 1 10 26,174 52 32K 4/18/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 1 10 26,175 52 32K 3/12/1993 4/29/2010 17.1 1 10 2293 30 30B 2/26/1994 3/24/2010 16.1 0 10 3353 121 41D 12/15/1989 5/25/2006 16.4 0 10 3354 121 41D 2/24/1990 5/25/2006 16.2 0 10 3355 121 41D 12/31/1989 5/25/2006 16.4 1 10 3723 101 41B 8/23/1990 9/19/2005 15.1 0 10 3724 101 41B 3/1/1990 9/19/2005 15.6 0 10 3725 101 41B 3/1/1990 5/29/2006 16.2 0 10 3726 101 41B 6/21/1990 5/29/2006 15.9 0 10 3727 101 41B 5/28/1990 5/29/2006 16.0 0 10 3728 101 41B 9/7/1990 9/19/2005 15.0 0 10 3729 101 41B 8/11/1988 9/13/2004 16.1 1 10 3730 101 41B 1/2/1989 9/13/2004 15.7 1 10 31,247 54 30J 4/26/1995 11/8/2010 15.5 0 10 31,248 54 30J 8/27/1994 11/8/2010 16.2 0 10 31,249 54 30J 3/13/1995 11/8/2010 15.7 1 10 31,469 2 30G 5/29/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 1 10 36,434 47 32J 11/2/1992 4/23/2010 17.5 0 10 36,435 47 32J 6/23/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 1 10 36,436 47 32J 2/23/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 1 10 36,437 47 32J 11/30/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 36,438 47 32J 5/5/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 1 10 36,568 48 32J 10/20/1993 5/3/2010 16.5 0 10 36,569 48 32J 5/25/1994 5/3/2010 15.9 0 10 31,610 7 32C 10/14/1993 3/16/2010 16.4 0 10 31,611 7 32C 10/29/1993 3/16/2010 16.4 0 10 31,612 7 32C 6/18/1993 3/16/2010 16.7 0 10 31,613 7 32C 7/8/1994 3/16/2010 15.7 0 10 31,614 7 32C 1/30/1994 3/16/2010 16.1 0 10 31,615 7 32C 10/21/1993 3/16/2010 16.4 1 10 31,616 7 32C 11/21/1993 3/16/2010 16.3 1 10 31,617 7 32C 2/1/1994 3/16/2010 16.1 1 10 31,618 7 32C 3/29/1994 3/16/2010 16.0 1 10 32,098 100 41A 4/29/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 32,099 100 41A 11/6/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 32,100 100 41A 6/17/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 32,101 100 41A 8/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 10 32,102 100 41A 9/6/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 10 32,103 100 41A 3/4/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 32,104 100 41A 11/20/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 32,105 100 41A 9/14/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 32,106 100 41A 1/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 32,107 100 41A 9/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 32,108 100 41A 4/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 32,109 100 41A 5/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 32,110 100 41A 7/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 10 32,111 100 41A 10/30/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 32,112 100 41A 4/20/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 3

Page 105: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 89

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,113 100 41A 5/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 10 32,114 100 41A 6/25/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 32,115 102 41A 5/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 32,116 102 41A 10/19/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 32,117 102 41A 2/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 32,118 102 41A 2/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 32,119 102 41A 4/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 32,120 102 41A 9/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 32,121 102 41A 2/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 32,122 103 41A 3/31/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 32,123 103 41A 8/28/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 10 32,124 103 41A 8/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 10 32,125 103 41A 7/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 32,126 103 41A 6/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 32,127 103 41A 9/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 32,128 103 41A 10/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 32,129 103 41A 3/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 10 32,130 103 41A 6/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 32,131 103 41A 9/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 10 32,132 105 41A 5/16/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 32,133 105 41A 6/6/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 32,134 107 41A 10/28/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 32,135 107 41A 5/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 32,136 107 41A 4/5/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 32,137 108 41A 10/9/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 32,138 108 41A 5/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 32,139 108 41A 10/10/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 10 32,140 108 41A 6/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 32,141 108 41A 12/11/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 32,142 108 41A 8/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 10 32,143 108 41A 3/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 32,144 108 41A 9/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 32,145 108 41A 2/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 32,146 108 41A 9/6/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 10 32,147 108 41A 6/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 10 32,148 108 41A 9/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 10 32,149 108 41A 8/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 10 32,150 108 41A 4/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 32,151 108 41A 1/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 32,152 108 41A 1/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 10 32,153 108 41A 5/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 32,154 108 41A 9/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 10 32,155 108 41A 3/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 33,117 28 30C 7/26/1994 4/30/2010 15.8 1 10 33,646 35 30E 11/5/1993 4/9/2010 16.4 1 10 33,647 35 30E 9/29/1993 4/9/2010 16.5 1 10 33,784 116 41F 2/28/1990 2/20/2006 16.0 0 10 33,785 116 41F 1/5/1990 9/25/2005 15.7 1 10 33,786 117 41F 7/7/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 33,787 117 41F 11/29/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 3

Page 106: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 90

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,788 117 41F 12/1/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 33,789 117 41F 7/20/1990 9/2/2005 15.1 0 10 33,790 117 41F 3/16/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 1 10 33,791 117 41F 3/15/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 1 10 33,792 117 41F 4/6/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 1 10 33,793 124 41F 10/16/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 0 10 33,794 124 41F 3/31/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 33,795 124 41F 7/11/1990 9/2/2005 15.1 1 10 34,151 36 30H 12/21/1994 11/11/2010 15.9 1 10 34,152 36 30H 10/10/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 1 10 34,465 20 32D 2/6/1994 3/22/2010 16.1 0 10 34,466 20 32D 10/23/1993 3/22/2010 16.4 0 10 34,467 20 32D 5/16/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 0 10 34,468 20 32D 9/12/1993 3/22/2010 16.5 0 10 34,469 20 32D 1/3/1994 3/22/2010 16.2 1 10 34,470 20 32D 12/8/1993 3/22/2010 16.3 1 10 34,471 20 32D 1/30/1994 3/22/2010 16.1 1 10 34,472 20 32D 8/10/1993 3/22/2010 16.6 1 10 34,599 5 32B 4/21/1994 3/18/2010 15.9 1 10 35,062 39 30I 12/8/1994 8/6/2010 15.7 0 10 35,063 39 30I 12/15/1994 8/6/2010 15.6 0 10 35,064 39 30I 12/15/1994 8/6/2010 15.6 0 10 35,065 39 30I 10/25/1994 8/6/2010 15.8 0 10 35,066 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 10 35,067 39 30I 12/12/1995 8/6/2010 14.7 0 10 35,068 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 10 35,069 39 30I 3/30/1995 8/6/2010 15.4 0 10 35,070 39 30I 3/23/1995 8/6/2010 15.4 0 10 35,071 39 30I 2/18/1995 8/6/2010 15.5 0 10 35,072 39 30I 7/8/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 0 10 35,073 39 30I 4/14/2010 0 10 35,074 39 30I 11/19/1993 4/14/2010 16.4 0 10 35,075 39 30I 8/16/1994 4/14/2010 15.7 0 10 35,076 39 30I 2/6/1995 8/6/2010 15.5 1 10 35,077 39 30I 8/5/1993 4/14/2010 16.7 1 10 35,078 39 30I 5/30/1993 4/14/2010 16.9 1 10 35,079 39 30I 12/27/1993 4/14/2010 16.3 1 10 35,080 39 30I 5/6/1994 4/14/2010 15.9 1 10 35,081 39 30I 3/1/1994 4/14/2010 16.1 1 10 35,082 39 30I 6/17/1994 4/14/2010 15.8 1 10 35,083 39 30I 1/25/1994 4/14/2010 16.2 1 10 36,176 52 32K 2/28/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 0 10 36,177 52 32K 6/30/1994 4/29/2010 15.8 0 10 36,178 52 32K 12/18/1993 4/29/2010 16.4 0 10 36,179 52 32K 6/23/1994 4/29/2010 15.8 0 10 36,180 52 32K 3/23/1994 4/29/2010 16.1 0 10 36,181 52 32K 2/10/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 0 10 36,182 52 32K 6/1/1994 4/29/2010 15.9 1 10 36,183 52 32K 2/4/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 36,184 52 32K 1/4/1994 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 3

Page 107: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 91

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,185 52 32K 6/1/1994 4/29/2010 15.9 1 10 36,186 52 32K 5/4/1993 4/29/2010 17.0 1 10 36,187 52 32K 9/16/1993 4/29/2010 16.6 1 10 36,188 52 32K 5/13/1993 4/29/2010 17.0 1 10 3356 114 41D 1/2/1990 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 4357 114 41D 1/23/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 4358 114 41D 8/1/1989 8/31/2004 15.1 0 10 4359 121 41D 6/14/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 4360 121 41D 12/31/1989 5/25/2006 16.4 0 10 4361 121 41D 12/31/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 4362 121 41D 11/9/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 4363 121 41D 2/24/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 4364 121 41D 2/19/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 1 10 4365 126 41D 11/26/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 4366 126 41D 12/29/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 4731 101 41B 10/5/1989 5/29/2006 16.6 0 10 4732 101 41B 9/25/1988 9/13/2004 16.0 0 10 4733 101 41B 11/5/1989 5/29/2006 16.6 1 10 4734 101 41B 1/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 4735 101 41B 11/3/1989 5/29/2006 16.6 1 10 4736 101 41B 3/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 4737 101 41B 1/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 4738 101 41B 12/18/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 41,250 54 30J 10/31/1994 11/8/2010 16.0 0 10 41,251 54 30J 4/13/1995 11/8/2010 15.6 0 10 41,252 54 30J 7/13/1995 11/8/2010 15.3 0 10 41,253 54 30J 6/16/1995 11/8/2010 15.4 0 10 41,322 9 32E 3/18/1994 3/30/2010 16.0 0 10 41,323 9 32E 1/14/1994 3/30/2010 16.2 0 10 41,324 9 32E 3/26/1993 3/30/2010 17.0 1 10 41,336 119 41J 5/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 10 41,470 2 30G 5/20/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 0 10 41,471 2 30G 7/26/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 0 10 46,352 41 32J 4/11/1994 4/20/2010 16.0 0 10 46,353 41 32J 10/4/1993 4/20/2010 16.5 0 10 46,439 47 32J 10/9/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 46,440 47 32J 5/3/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 0 10 46,441 47 32J 6/2/1994 4/23/2010 15.9 0 10 46,442 47 32J 3/5/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 46,443 47 32J 1/23/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 0 10 46,444 47 32J 11/5/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 46,445 47 32J 12/19/1993 4/23/2010 16.3 0 10 46,446 47 32J 10/25/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 46,447 47 32J 9/25/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 46,448 47 32J 3/12/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 46,449 47 32J 11/22/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 46,450 47 32J 6/24/1993 4/23/2010 16.8 1 10 46,451 47 32J 11/17/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 46,570 48 32J 1/18/1994 5/3/2010 16.3 0 10 46,571 48 32J 12/25/1993 5/3/2010 16.4 0 10 4

Page 108: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 92

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,572 48 32J 11/24/1993 5/3/2010 16.4 0 10 46,573 48 32J 4/21/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 1 10 46,574 48 32J 7/20/1994 5/3/2010 15.8 1 10 41,619 7 32C 11/26/1993 3/16/2010 16.3 0 10 41,620 7 32C 3/17/1994 3/16/2010 16.0 1 10 42,156 100 41A 8/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 10 42,157 100 41A 12/29/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 42,158 100 41A 7/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 42,159 100 41A 12/18/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 42,160 100 41A 3/25/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 42,161 100 41A 7/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 42,162 100 41A 10/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 42,163 100 41A 8/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 42,164 100 41A 1/28/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 42,165 100 41A 4/16/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 10 42,166 100 41A 3/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 42,167 100 41A 9/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 42,168 102 41A 7/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 42,169 102 41A 4/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 42,170 102 41A 4/4/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 42,171 102 41A 3/29/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 42,172 102 41A 2/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 42,173 102 41A 3/17/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 10 42,174 103 41A 9/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 42,175 103 41A 9/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 10 42,176 103 41A 6/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 42,177 103 41A 5/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 42,178 103 41A 1/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 42,179 103 41A 8/26/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 10 42,180 104 41A 2/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 42,181 107 41A 11/26/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 10 42,182 108 41A 7/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 42,183 108 41A 3/6/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 42,184 108 41A 5/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 42,185 108 41A 11/19/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 42,186 108 41A 4/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 42,187 108 41A 11/1/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 42,188 108 41A 7/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 42,189 108 41A 11/9/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 42,190 108 41A 2/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 42,191 108 41A 10/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 42,192 108 41A 10/9/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 10 42,193 108 41A 1/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 42,194 108 41A 8/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 42,195 108 41A 3/1/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 42,196 108 41A 2/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 42,197 108 41A 9/13/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 42,198 108 41A 12/5/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 10 42,199 108 41A 6/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 10 42,200 108 41A 10/22/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 4

Page 109: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 93

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,201 108 41A 10/30/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 42,202 108 41A 9/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 42,203 108 41A 6/20/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 42,204 108 41A 1/29/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 43,227 122 41G 5/17/1989 6/10/2005 16.1 0 10 43,228 122 41G 4/6/1989 9/6/2004 15.4 0 10 43,648 35 30E 8/25/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 0 10 43,649 35 30E 8/29/1994 4/9/2010 15.6 0 10 43,650 35 30E 6/6/1994 4/9/2010 15.8 1 10 43,796 116 41F 8/18/1989 9/25/2005 16.1 0 10 43,797 116 41F 6/15/1989 9/25/2005 16.3 0 10 43,798 116 41F 12/4/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 43,799 116 41F 12/1/1988 6/1/2005 16.5 0 10 43,800 116 41F 11/8/1989 2/20/2006 16.3 0 10 43,801 116 41F 2/28/1990 9/25/2005 15.6 0 10 43,802 116 41F 1/9/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 43,803 116 41F 11/5/1989 9/25/2005 15.9 1 10 43,804 116 41F 6/7/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 1 10 43,805 117 41F 9/18/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 1 10 43,806 124 41F 5/22/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 0 10 43,807 124 41F 4/18/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 43,808 124 41F 6/19/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 0 10 43,809 124 41F 4/7/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 43,810 124 41F 3/12/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 43,811 124 41F 9/21/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 0 10 43,812 124 41F 1/19/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 43,813 124 41F 9/1/1990 9/2/2005 15.0 1 10 44,153 36 30H 5/3/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 0 10 44,154 36 30H 12/9/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 0 10 44,155 36 30H 8/6/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 0 10 44,156 36 30H 3/29/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 1 10 44,473 20 32D 12/12/1993 3/22/2010 16.3 0 10 44,474 20 32D 11/5/1993 3/22/2010 16.4 0 10 44,475 20 32D 5/14/1994 3/22/2010 15.9 0 10 44,476 20 32D 5/17/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 0 10 44,477 20 32D 8/3/1993 3/22/2010 16.6 1 10 44,478 20 32D 4/30/1994 3/22/2010 15.9 1 10 44,479 20 32D 3/15/1994 3/22/2010 16.0 1 10 44,896 27 30F 2/10/1991 11/3/2010 19.7 1 10 45,084 39 30I 1/1/1995 8/6/2010 15.6 0 10 45,085 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 10 45,086 39 30I 2/14/1995 8/6/2010 15.5 0 10 45,087 39 30I 7/30/1995 8/6/2010 15.0 1 10 45,088 39 30I 3/14/1995 8/6/2010 15.4 1 10 45,429 123 41H 4/20/1989 9/9/2004 15.4 0 10 45,430 123 41H 11/21/1988 6/1/2005 16.5 0 10 46,189 52 32K 10/1/1993 4/29/2010 16.6 0 10 46,190 52 32K 12/11/1993 4/29/2010 16.4 0 10 46,191 52 32K 11/2/1993 4/29/2010 16.5 0 10 46,192 52 32K 9/15/1993 4/29/2010 16.6 0 10 4

Page 110: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 94

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,193 52 32K 5/15/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 0 10 46,194 52 32K 9/29/1994 4/29/2010 15.6 0 10 46,195 52 32K 1/13/1993 4/29/2010 17.3 1 10 46,196 52 32K 7/13/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 1 10 46,197 52 32K 8/21/1993 4/29/2010 16.7 1 10 46,198 52 32K 7/18/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 1 10 46,199 52 32K 6/28/1994 4/29/2010 15.8 1 10 46,200 52 32K 4/14/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 1 10 46,201 52 32K 9/16/1993 4/29/2010 16.6 1 10 46,202 52 32K 1/17/1994 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 416 15 32L 11/12/1993 5/7/2010 16.5 0 10 5367 114 41D 1/23/1990 5/25/2006 16.3 0 10 5368 114 41D 10/4/1988 8/31/2004 15.9 0 10 5369 114 41D 1/2/1990 5/25/2006 16.4 0 10 5370 114 41D 8/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 1 10 5371 114 41D 4/4/1989 8/31/2004 15.4 1 10 5372 121 41D 6/14/1990 5/25/2006 15.9 0 10 5373 121 41D 11/3/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 5374 121 41D 11/9/1989 5/25/2006 16.5 0 10 5375 121 41D 12/15/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 5376 121 41D 7/3/1990 5/25/2006 15.9 0 10 5377 121 41D 10/23/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 0 10 5378 121 41D 2/7/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 5379 126 41D 4/21/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 5739 101 41B 11/17/1989 9/19/2005 15.8 0 10 5740 101 41B 4/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 5741 101 41B 6/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 5742 101 41B 9/8/1989 5/29/2006 16.7 1 10 51,254 54 30J 11/8/1994 11/8/2010 16.0 0 10 51,255 54 30J 11/8/2010 1 10 51,256 54 30J 4/4/1995 11/8/2010 15.6 1 10 51,257 54 30J 11/8/2010 1 10 51,325 9 32E 3/8/1994 3/30/2010 16.1 0 10 51,326 9 32E 3/8/1994 3/30/2010 16.1 1 10 51,472 2 30G 1/24/1994 5/13/2010 16.3 0 10 51,473 2 30G 12/17/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 0 10 51,474 2 30G 4/8/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 0 10 56,354 41 32J 4/30/1994 4/20/2010 16.0 0 10 56,452 47 32J 10/12/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 56,453 47 32J 9/20/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 56,454 47 32J 8/1/1994 4/23/2010 15.7 0 10 56,455 47 32J 6/22/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 0 10 56,456 47 32J 10/18/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 1 10 56,457 47 32J 10/13/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 1 10 56,458 47 32J 4/6/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 1 10 56,575 48 32J 9/7/1993 5/3/2010 16.7 0 10 56,576 48 32J 4/24/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 10 51,571 14 32H 4/15/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 0 10 51,621 7 32C 2/8/1994 3/16/2010 16.1 0 10 51,622 7 32C 10/10/1993 3/16/2010 16.4 0 10 5

Page 111: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 95

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,623 7 32C 9/24/1993 3/16/2010 16.5 0 10 51,624 7 32C 3/21/1994 3/16/2010 16.0 0 10 51,625 7 32C 2/6/1994 3/16/2010 16.1 1 10 51,626 7 32C 5/17/1994 3/16/2010 15.8 1 10 52,205 100 41A 10/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 10 52,206 100 41A 1/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 52,207 100 41A 1/25/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 52,208 100 41A 3/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 52,209 100 41A 9/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 52,210 100 41A 5/6/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 52,211 100 41A 7/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 52,212 100 41A 4/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 52,213 102 41A 12/31/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 52,214 102 41A 7/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 52,215 102 41A 6/30/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 52,216 102 41A 4/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 52,217 102 41A 12/25/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 52,218 102 41A 6/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 10 52,219 102 41A 1/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 52,220 103 41A 7/19/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 52,221 103 41A 5/23/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 52,222 103 41A 7/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 52,223 103 41A 4/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 52,224 103 41A 3/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 52,225 103 41A 4/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 52,226 103 41A 11/3/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 52,227 103 41A 5/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 10 52,228 103 41A 11/12/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 52,229 103 41A 5/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 10 52,230 105 41A 5/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 52,231 108 41A 12/1/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 52,232 108 41A 6/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 52,233 108 41A 8/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 10 52,234 108 41A 4/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 52,235 108 41A 2/1/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 52,236 108 41A 4/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 52,237 108 41A 2/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 52,238 108 41A 5/28/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 52,239 108 41A 1/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 52,240 108 41A 7/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 10 52,241 108 41A 2/27/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 52,242 109 41A 6/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 52,243 110 41A 9/5/1989 6/2/2005 15.7 1 10 53,118 28 30C 12/17/1993 4/30/2010 16.4 0 10 53,119 28 30C 9/10/1993 4/30/2010 16.6 1 10 53,120 28 30C 8/9/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 1 10 53,121 28 30C 1/8/1994 4/30/2010 16.3 1 10 53,229 122 41G 7/17/1988 9/6/2004 16.1 0 10 53,397 125 41I 6/5/1989 6/1/2005 16.0 0 10 53,651 35 30E 4/2/1994 4/9/2010 16.0 1 10 5

Page 112: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 96

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,814 116 41F 11/3/1989 9/25/2005 15.9 0 10 53,815 116 41F 5/10/1989 6/1/2005 16.1 0 10 53,816 116 41F 3/18/1990 9/25/2005 15.5 0 10 53,817 116 41F 12/26/1989 9/25/2005 15.7 0 10 53,818 116 41F 10/17/1989 9/25/2005 15.9 1 10 53,819 116 41F 11/22/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 1 10 53,820 116 41F 11/22/1989 9/25/2005 15.8 1 10 53,821 116 41F 8/21/1989 9/25/2005 16.1 1 10 53,822 116 41F 6/7/1990 9/25/2005 15.3 1 10 53,823 117 41F 7/7/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 0 10 53,824 117 41F 11/29/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 53,825 117 41F 3/15/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 0 10 53,826 117 41F 3/15/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 53,827 117 41F 7/20/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 0 10 53,828 117 41F 8/30/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 0 10 53,829 117 41F 8/5/1989 9/2/2005 16.1 1 10 53,830 124 41F 2/15/1990 2/20/2006 16.0 0 10 53,831 124 41F 7/19/1990 9/2/2005 15.1 0 10 53,832 124 41F 12/8/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 53,833 124 41F 4/7/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 0 10 53,834 124 41F 10/3/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 0 10 53,835 124 41F 12/4/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 1 10 53,836 124 41F 5/15/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 1 10 54,157 36 30H 5/12/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 0 10 54,158 36 30H 7/24/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 0 10 54,159 36 30H 1/12/1955 11/11/2010 55.8 1 10 54,160 36 30H 11/11/2010 1 10 54,161 36 30H 11/11/2010 1 10 54,162 36 30H 7/6/1994 5/13/2010 15.9 1 10 54,163 36 30H 3/3/1994 5/13/2010 16.2 1 10 54,164 36 30H 10/25/1993 5/13/2010 16.5 1 10 54,480 20 32D 12/20/1993 3/22/2010 16.3 0 10 54,481 20 32D 3/1/1994 3/22/2010 16.1 0 10 54,482 20 32D 12/6/1993 3/22/2010 16.3 1 10 54,483 20 32D 6/2/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 1 10 54,484 20 32D 9/16/1993 3/22/2010 16.5 1 10 54,485 20 32D 1/12/1994 3/22/2010 16.2 1 10 54,486 38 32D 10/23/1993 3/22/2010 16.4 0 10 55,089 39 30I 12/14/1994 8/6/2010 15.6 1 10 56,203 52 32K 4/20/1993 4/29/2010 17.0 0 10 56,204 52 32K 3/31/1994 4/29/2010 16.1 0 10 56,205 52 32K 12/15/1993 4/29/2010 16.4 0 10 56,206 52 32K 3/11/1994 4/29/2010 16.1 1 10 56,207 52 32K 1/23/1994 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 56,208 52 32K 11/6/1993 4/29/2010 16.5 1 10 56,209 52 32K 10/21/1993 4/29/2010 16.5 1 10 56,210 52 32K 11/17/1992 4/29/2010 17.4 1 10 56,211 52 32K 1/25/1994 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 56,212 52 32K 3/2/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 56,213 52 32K 1/24/1993 4/29/2010 17.3 1 10 5

Page 113: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 97

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

17 15 32L 2/18/1994 5/7/2010 16.2 0 10 6380 114 41D 3/3/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 6381 114 41D 10/4/1988 5/23/2005 16.6 0 10 6382 114 41D 12/29/1989 5/25/2006 16.4 0 10 6383 114 41D 7/18/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 0 10 6384 114 41D 4/18/1989 8/31/2004 15.4 0 10 6385 114 41D 8/1/1989 5/23/2005 15.8 0 10 6386 114 41D 10/31/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 1 10 6387 114 41D 3/30/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 1 10 6388 114 41D 11/6/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 1 10 6389 114 41D 6/21/1988 5/23/2005 16.9 1 10 6390 114 41D 6/21/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 1 10 6391 121 41D 11/3/1989 5/25/2006 16.6 0 10 6392 121 41D 7/3/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 6393 121 41D 4/4/1990 5/25/2006 16.1 0 10 6394 121 41D 9/4/1989 5/25/2006 16.7 0 10 6395 121 41D 9/4/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 0 10 6396 121 41D 9/4/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 1 10 6743 101 41B 1/23/1990 9/19/2005 15.7 0 10 6744 101 41B 9/25/1988 5/27/2005 16.7 0 10 6745 101 41B 11/5/1989 9/19/2005 15.9 1 10 61,258 54 30J 3/26/1995 11/8/2010 15.6 0 10 61,259 54 30J 3/11/1995 11/8/2010 15.7 0 10 61,260 54 30J 5/29/1995 11/8/2010 15.4 0 10 61,261 54 30J 2/3/1995 11/8/2010 15.8 0 10 61,262 54 30J 8/28/1995 11/8/2010 15.2 1 10 61,263 54 30J 12/15/1994 11/8/2010 15.9 1 10 61,264 54 30J 8/22/1995 11/8/2010 15.2 1 10 61,327 9 32E 4/4/1994 3/30/2010 16.0 0 10 61,328 9 32E 12/1/1993 3/30/2010 16.3 0 10 61,337 118 41J 10/24/1988 8/31/2004 15.9 1 10 66,355 41 32J 7/28/1994 4/20/2010 15.7 0 10 66,356 41 32J 9/24/1993 4/20/2010 16.6 0 10 66,357 41 32J 12/20/1993 4/20/2010 16.3 1 10 66,358 41 32J 5/24/1994 4/20/2010 15.9 1 10 66,359 41 32J 7/6/1994 4/20/2010 15.8 1 10 66,459 47 32J 10/26/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 66,460 47 32J 1/9/1995 4/23/2010 15.3 0 10 66,461 47 32J 9/6/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 66,462 47 32J 5/23/1994 4/23/2010 15.9 0 10 66,463 47 32J 8/5/1993 4/23/2010 16.7 0 10 66,464 47 32J 12/14/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 0 10 66,465 47 32J 10/5/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 66,466 47 32J 1/17/1994 4/23/2010 16.3 1 10 66,467 47 32J 8/5/1993 4/23/2010 16.7 1 10 66,468 47 32J 10/30/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 1 10 66,469 47 32J 5/22/1993 4/23/2010 16.9 1 10 66,470 47 32J 1/28/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 1 10 66,471 47 32J 11/21/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 66,577 48 32J 4/29/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 10 6

Page 114: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 98

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,578 48 32J 12/14/1993 5/3/2010 16.4 0 10 66,579 48 32J 5/1/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 10 66,580 48 32J 5/17/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 10 66,581 48 32J 6/11/1993 5/3/2010 16.9 1 10 66,582 48 32J 10/5/1993 5/3/2010 16.6 1 10 66,583 48 32J 11/4/1993 5/3/2010 16.5 1 10 61,572 14 32H 5/6/1994 4/30/2010 16.0 0 10 61,627 7 32C 7/7/1993 3/16/2010 16.7 1 10 61,628 7 32C 6/25/1994 3/16/2010 15.7 1 10 62,244 100 41A 1/31/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 62,245 100 41A 11/17/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 62,246 100 41A 4/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 62,247 100 41A 12/28/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 62,248 100 41A 4/5/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 62,249 102 41A 12/20/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 62,250 102 41A 10/17/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 62,251 102 41A 1/10/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 62,252 102 41A 5/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 62,253 103 41A 12/24/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 62,254 103 41A 9/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 62,255 103 41A 9/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 62,256 103 41A 8/25/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 62,257 103 41A 6/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 62,258 103 41A 3/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 62,259 108 41A 5/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 62,260 108 41A 3/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 62,261 108 41A 11/8/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 62,262 108 41A 4/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 62,263 108 41A 6/15/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 62,264 108 41A 8/12/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 62,265 108 41A 2/8/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 62,266 108 41A 5/25/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 62,267 110 41A 9/5/1989 9/29/2004 15.1 1 10 63,122 28 30C 6/17/1994 4/30/2010 15.9 0 10 63,123 28 30C 2/11/1994 4/30/2010 16.2 0 10 63,124 28 30C 11/28/1993 4/30/2010 16.4 1 10 63,230 122 41G 10/15/1990 9/6/2005 14.9 0 10 63,231 122 41G 12/30/1988 9/6/2004 15.7 1 10 63,232 122 41G 12/3/1990 9/6/2005 14.8 1 10 63,233 122 41G 3/13/1989 9/6/2004 15.5 1 10 63,234 122 41G 3/13/1989 9/6/2004 15.5 1 10 63,235 122 41G 11/10/1988 9/6/2004 15.8 1 10 63,398 125 41I 10/12/1988 6/1/2005 16.6 1 10 63,652 35 30E 7/31/1994 4/9/2010 15.7 0 10 63,653 35 30E 7/21/1994 4/9/2010 15.7 0 10 63,654 35 30E 12/1/1993 4/9/2010 16.4 1 10 63,837 116 41F 12/3/1989 9/25/2005 15.8 0 10 63,838 116 41F 11/3/1989 2/20/2006 16.3 0 10 63,839 116 41F 8/18/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 0 10 63,840 116 41F 6/23/1990 9/25/2005 15.3 0 10 6

Page 115: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 99

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,841 116 41F 3/11/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 0 10 63,842 116 41F 6/29/1989 6/1/2005 15.9 0 10 63,843 116 41F 8/4/1989 6/1/2005 15.8 0 10 63,844 116 41F 10/2/1988 6/1/2005 16.7 0 10 63,845 116 41F 11/8/1989 9/25/2005 15.9 0 10 63,846 116 41F 7/17/1990 9/25/2005 15.2 0 10 63,847 116 41F 1/28/1990 9/25/2005 15.7 0 10 63,848 116 41F 4/5/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 0 10 63,849 116 41F 10/27/1988 6/1/2005 16.6 1 10 63,850 116 41F 8/7/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 1 10 63,851 116 41F 8/7/1989 9/25/2005 16.1 1 10 63,852 116 41F 5/13/1989 6/1/2005 16.1 1 10 63,853 117 41F 6/20/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 0 10 63,854 117 41F 12/1/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 63,855 117 41F 12/15/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 63,856 117 41F 6/1/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 63,857 117 41F 5/7/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 63,858 117 41F 6/27/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 63,859 117 41F 10/7/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 1 10 63,860 117 41F 5/17/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 1 10 63,861 117 41F 1/24/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 63,862 124 41F 2/24/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 63,863 124 41F 5/22/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 63,864 124 41F 10/14/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 0 10 63,865 124 41F 2/28/1990 2/20/2006 16.0 0 10 63,866 124 41F 6/6/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 63,867 124 41F 6/21/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 63,868 124 41F 12/2/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 63,869 124 41F 1/18/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 0 10 63,870 124 41F 1/19/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 63,871 124 41F 7/15/1989 2/20/2006 16.6 1 10 64,165 36 30H 4/14/1995 11/11/2010 15.6 0 10 64,166 36 30H 5/11/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 0 10 64,167 36 30H 10/12/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 0 10 64,168 36 30H 8/11/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 1 10 64,487 20 32D 5/27/1994 3/22/2010 15.8 0 10 64,488 20 32D 12/27/1993 3/22/2010 16.2 1 10 64,489 20 32D 9/16/1993 3/22/2010 16.5 1 10 64,490 20 32D 3/9/1994 3/22/2010 16.0 1 10 64,491 20 32D 7/26/1993 3/22/2010 16.7 1 10 65,090 39 30I 5/28/1994 4/14/2010 15.9 0 10 66,214 50 32K 12/13/1992 5/5/2010 17.4 1 10 66,215 52 32K 6/14/1993 4/29/2010 16.9 1 10 66,216 52 32K 3/4/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 66,217 52 32K 3/16/1994 4/29/2010 16.1 1 10 66,218 52 32K 8/12/1993 4/29/2010 16.7 1 10 66,219 52 32K 7/20/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 1 10 66,220 52 32K 2/16/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 66,221 52 32K 12/31/1993 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 6397 114 41D 4/17/1990 5/25/2006 16.1 0 10 7

Page 116: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 100

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

398 114 41D 10/31/1989 5/25/2006 16.6 0 10 7399 114 41D 5/1/1990 5/25/2006 16.1 0 10 7400 114 41D 5/1/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 7401 114 41D 4/17/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 7402 114 41D 4/2/1989 5/23/2005 16.1 1 10 7403 114 41D 6/9/1990 5/25/2006 16.0 1 10 7404 121 41D 11/11/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 7405 121 41D 10/23/1989 5/25/2006 16.6 0 10 7406 121 41D 4/29/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 7407 121 41D 2/7/1990 5/25/2006 16.3 1 10 7746 101 41B 12/25/1991 9/20/2006 14.7 0 10 7747 101 41B 5/7/1990 9/19/2005 15.4 0 10 7748 101 41B 12/19/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 10 7749 101 41B 9/1/1989 9/13/2004 15.0 1 10 71,265 54 30J 9/7/1994 11/8/2010 16.2 0 10 71,266 54 30J 7/18/1994 11/8/2010 16.3 0 10 71,267 54 30J 4/25/1995 11/8/2010 15.5 0 10 71,268 54 30J 12/19/1995 11/8/2010 14.9 1 10 71,269 54 30J 3/12/1995 11/8/2010 15.7 1 10 71,270 54 30J 11/8/2010 1 10 71,271 54 30J 7/7/1994 11/8/2010 16.3 1 10 71,272 54 30J 10/6/1994 11/8/2010 16.1 1 10 71,273 54 30J 12/7/1994 11/8/2010 15.9 1 10 71,329 9 32E 12/6/1992 3/30/2010 17.3 0 10 71,330 9 32E 3/23/1993 3/30/2010 17.0 1 10 71,338 119 41J 9/23/1988 8/31/2004 15.9 0 10 71,475 2 30G 8/31/1994 5/13/2010 15.7 0 10 71,476 2 30G 9/17/1993 5/13/2010 16.7 0 10 71,477 2 30G 10/12/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 0 10 71,478 2 30G 1/17/1994 5/13/2010 16.3 0 10 71,479 2 30G 9/30/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 0 10 71,480 2 30G 3/13/1994 5/13/2010 16.2 0 10 71,481 2 30G 7/12/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 0 10 71,482 2 30G 8/30/1994 5/13/2010 15.7 0 10 71,483 2 30G 12/14/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 1 10 71,484 2 30G 7/20/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 1 10 71,485 2 30G 5/26/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 1 10 71,486 2 30G 7/20/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 1 10 76,360 41 32J 11/4/1993 4/20/2010 16.5 0 10 76,361 41 32J 11/3/1993 4/20/2010 16.5 0 10 76,472 47 32J 9/16/1994 4/23/2010 15.6 0 10 76,473 47 32J 10/25/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 76,474 47 32J 2/5/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 0 10 76,475 47 32J 3/17/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 76,476 47 32J 12/16/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 0 10 76,477 47 32J 11/1/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 76,478 47 32J 7/14/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 0 10 76,479 47 32J 3/11/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 76,480 47 32J 7/1/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 0 10 76,481 47 32J 11/12/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 0 10 7

Page 117: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 101

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,482 47 32J 8/20/1994 4/23/2010 15.7 0 10 76,483 47 32J 10/12/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 1 10 76,484 47 32J 8/3/1994 4/23/2010 15.7 1 10 76,485 47 32J 2/12/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 1 10 76,486 47 32J 3/18/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 1 10 76,487 47 32J 6/29/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 1 10 76,488 47 32J 11/27/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 76,489 47 32J 2/10/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 1 10 76,584 48 32J 4/24/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 0 10 76,585 48 32J 8/21/1993 5/3/2010 16.7 0 10 76,586 48 32J 3/17/1994 5/3/2010 16.1 0 10 76,587 48 32J 11/1/1993 5/3/2010 16.5 0 10 76,588 48 32J 1/18/1994 5/3/2010 16.3 0 10 76,589 48 32J 5/13/1994 5/3/2010 16.0 1 10 76,590 48 32J 11/17/1993 5/3/2010 16.5 1 10 76,591 48 32J 11/11/1993 5/3/2010 16.5 1 10 71,629 7 32C 11/22/1993 3/16/2010 16.3 0 10 72,268 100 41A 9/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 10 72,269 100 41A 5/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 72,270 100 41A 6/29/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 72,271 100 41A 11/16/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 72,272 100 41A 3/5/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 72,273 100 41A 12/14/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 72,274 100 41A 12/20/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 72,275 100 41A 6/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 72,276 100 41A 8/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 10 72,277 102 41A 1/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 72,278 102 41A 6/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 72,279 102 41A 7/20/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 72,280 102 41A 1/17/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 72,281 103 41A 4/11/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 72,282 103 41A 7/24/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 72,283 103 41A 4/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 72,284 103 41A 3/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 0 10 72,285 103 41A 1/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 72,286 103 41A 8/4/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 72,287 104 41A 9/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 0 10 72,288 108 41A 5/5/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 72,289 108 41A 1/2/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 1 10 72,290 108 41A 6/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 10 72,291 108 41A 2/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 72,292 108 41A 3/31/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 1 10 72,293 110 41A 4/25/1989 6/2/2005 16.1 0 10 73,125 28 30C 9/17/1993 4/30/2010 16.6 0 10 73,126 28 30C 6/8/1994 4/30/2010 15.9 0 10 73,127 28 30C 3/10/1994 4/30/2010 16.1 1 10 73,128 28 30C 5/15/1994 4/30/2010 16.0 1 10 73,236 122 41G 10/8/1988 9/6/2004 15.9 0 10 73,237 122 41G 4/24/1989 9/6/2004 15.4 0 10 73,238 122 41G 4/2/1990 9/6/2005 15.4 0 10 7

Page 118: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 102

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,239 122 41G 6/5/1989 9/6/2004 15.3 0 10 73,240 122 41G 11/25/1989 9/6/2004 14.8 1 10 73,241 122 41G 2/13/1989 9/6/2004 15.6 1 10 73,399 125 41I 2/7/1989 6/1/2005 16.3 1 10 73,655 35 30E 4/9/1994 4/9/2010 16.0 1 10 73,656 35 30E 2/2/1994 4/9/2010 16.2 1 10 73,657 35 30E 6/22/1994 4/9/2010 15.8 1 10 73,872 116 41F 6/15/1989 2/20/2006 16.7 0 10 73,873 116 41F 6/23/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 0 10 73,874 116 41F 8/20/1990 9/25/2005 15.1 0 10 73,875 116 41F 10/6/1989 9/25/2005 16.0 0 10 73,876 116 41F 12/4/1989 9/25/2005 15.8 0 10 73,877 116 41F 4/26/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 0 10 73,878 116 41F 7/17/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 0 10 73,879 116 41F 12/11/1988 6/1/2005 16.5 0 10 73,880 116 41F 4/13/1989 6/1/2005 16.1 1 10 73,881 116 41F 7/14/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 1 10 73,882 116 41F 3/30/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 1 10 73,883 116 41F 3/30/1990 9/25/2005 15.5 1 10 73,884 116 41F 5/12/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 1 10 73,885 116 41F 5/12/1990 9/25/2005 15.4 1 10 73,886 116 41F 8/1/1989 9/25/2005 16.2 1 10 73,887 116 41F 12/27/1988 6/1/2005 16.4 1 10 73,888 116 41F 7/26/1989 9/25/2005 16.2 1 10 73,889 116 41F 12/15/1988 6/1/2005 16.5 1 10 73,890 116 41F 3/26/1990 9/25/2005 15.5 1 10 73,891 117 41F 12/15/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 73,892 117 41F 6/1/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 0 10 73,893 117 41F 1/20/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 73,894 117 41F 6/19/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 1 10 73,895 117 41F 1/31/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 73,896 117 41F 5/17/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 1 10 73,897 117 41F 8/1/1990 9/2/2005 15.1 1 10 73,898 124 41F 5/16/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 73,899 124 41F 6/6/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 0 10 73,900 124 41F 2/28/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 73,901 124 41F 5/1/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 0 10 73,902 124 41F 12/26/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 73,903 124 41F 12/8/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 73,904 124 41F 9/18/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 0 10 73,905 124 41F 10/3/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 0 10 73,906 124 41F 5/14/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 73,907 124 41F 6/7/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 73,908 124 41F 6/7/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 0 10 73,909 124 41F 1/18/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 73,910 124 41F 1/11/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 73,911 124 41F 12/1/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 1 10 73,912 124 41F 10/23/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 1 10 73,913 124 41F 7/15/1989 9/2/2005 16.1 1 10 73,914 124 41F 9/29/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 1 10 7

Page 119: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 103

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,915 124 41F 7/2/1989 2/20/2006 16.6 1 10 73,916 124 41F 9/1/1990 2/20/2006 15.5 1 10 73,917 124 41F 2/3/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 74,169 36 30H 2/8/1994 5/13/2010 16.3 0 10 74,170 36 30H 6/7/1994 5/13/2010 15.9 1 10 74,492 20 32D 2/26/1994 3/22/2010 16.1 0 10 74,493 20 32D 11/11/1993 3/22/2010 16.4 0 10 74,494 20 32D 2/18/1994 3/22/2010 16.1 0 10 74,495 20 32D 7/18/1994 3/22/2010 15.7 0 10 74,496 20 32D 6/28/1994 3/22/2010 15.7 0 10 74,497 20 32D 8/12/1994 3/22/2010 15.6 1 10 74,498 20 32D 1/31/1994 3/22/2010 16.1 1 10 74,499 20 32D 7/29/1994 3/22/2010 15.6 1 10 75,431 123 41H 11/21/1988 9/9/2004 15.8 0 10 76,222 52 32K 8/16/1993 4/29/2010 16.7 0 10 76,223 52 32K 11/14/1993 4/29/2010 16.5 0 10 76,224 52 32K 11/4/1993 4/29/2010 16.5 1 10 76,225 52 32K 5/11/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 1 10 76,226 52 32K 12/4/1993 4/29/2010 16.4 1 10 76,227 52 32K 8/16/1993 4/29/2010 16.7 1 10 7408 114 41D 9/14/1989 5/25/2006 16.7 0 10 8409 114 41D 8/19/1988 5/23/2005 16.8 0 10 8410 114 41D 4/18/1989 5/23/2005 16.1 0 10 8411 114 41D 11/6/1989 5/25/2006 16.5 1 10 8412 114 41D 8/30/1989 5/25/2006 16.7 1 10 8413 114 41D 9/11/1988 8/31/2004 16.0 1 10 8414 114 41D 6/30/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 1 10 8415 114 41D 6/5/1989 5/25/2006 17.0 1 10 8416 114 41D 3/30/1990 5/25/2006 16.2 1 10 8417 114 41D 8/22/1989 8/31/2004 15.0 1 10 8418 121 41D 1/27/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 8419 121 41D 4/25/1990 5/25/2006 16.1 0 10 8420 126 41D 7/5/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 1 10 8750 101 41B 3/4/1989 5/27/2005 16.2 1 10 8751 101 41B 1/14/1989 5/27/2005 16.4 1 10 81,274 54 30J 8/31/1995 11/8/2010 15.2 0 10 81,275 54 30J 5/4/1995 11/8/2010 15.5 0 10 81,331 9 32E 6/5/1994 3/30/2010 15.8 0 10 81,339 119 41J 3/30/1989 8/31/2004 15.4 0 10 81,487 2 30G 11/4/1994 5/13/2010 15.5 0 10 81,488 2 30G 7/24/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 0 10 81,489 2 30G 4/21/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 0 10 81,490 2 30G 5/2/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 0 10 81,491 2 30G 7/27/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 1 10 81,492 2 30G 3/22/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 1 10 81,493 2 30G 4/7/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 1 10 81,494 2 30G 5/2/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 1 10 86,362 41 32J 3/21/1994 4/20/2010 16.1 1 10 86,363 41 32J 1/31/1995 4/20/2010 15.2 1 10 86,490 47 32J 12/11/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 0 10 8

Page 120: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 104

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,491 47 32J 7/14/1993 4/23/2010 16.8 0 10 86,492 47 32J 10/25/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 86,493 47 32J 3/1/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 86,494 47 32J 9/7/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 86,495 47 32J 9/6/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 86,496 47 32J 9/25/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 86,497 47 32J 5/4/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 0 10 86,498 47 32J 5/26/1994 4/23/2010 15.9 0 10 86,499 47 32J 10/22/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 0 10 86,500 47 32J 12/17/1993 4/23/2010 16.3 1 10 86,501 47 32J 11/12/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 86,502 47 32J 1/25/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 1 10 86,503 47 32J 10/28/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 1 10 86,504 47 32J 10/25/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 1 10 86,505 47 32J 11/19/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 86,592 48 32J 4/1/1994 5/3/2010 16.1 0 10 86,593 48 32J 7/24/1994 5/3/2010 15.8 0 10 86,594 48 32J 7/28/1993 5/3/2010 16.8 0 10 86,595 48 32J 11/16/1993 5/3/2010 16.5 0 10 86,596 48 32J 7/3/1993 5/3/2010 16.8 0 10 86,597 48 32J 1/2/1994 5/3/2010 16.3 1 10 86,598 48 32J 6/23/1994 5/3/2010 15.9 1 10 81,573 14 32H 4/3/1994 4/30/2010 16.1 0 10 81,630 7 32C 5/16/1994 3/16/2010 15.8 0 10 82,294 100 41A 10/26/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 82,295 100 41A 4/13/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 82,296 100 41A 10/15/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 82,297 100 41A 11/1/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 82,298 102 41A 1/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 82,299 102 41A 6/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 1 10 82,300 103 41A 11/8/1991 9/20/2006 14.9 0 10 82,301 103 41A 9/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 82,302 103 41A 10/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 82,303 103 41A 7/1/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 1 10 82,304 104 41A 8/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 1 10 82,305 107 41A 5/13/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 10 82,306 108 41A 12/29/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 82,307 108 41A 2/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 10 82,308 108 41A 2/21/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 82,309 108 41A 11/9/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 82,310 110 41A 2/24/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 10 82,311 110 41A 10/12/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 83,129 28 30C 10/28/1993 4/30/2010 16.5 0 10 83,130 28 30C 11/16/1993 4/30/2010 16.5 0 10 83,131 28 30C 1/9/1994 4/30/2010 16.3 1 10 83,132 28 30C 8/16/1994 4/30/2010 15.7 1 10 83,133 28 30C 10/26/1993 4/30/2010 16.5 1 10 83,242 122 41G 5/17/1989 9/6/2004 15.3 0 10 83,243 122 41G 5/19/1988 6/10/2005 17.1 0 10 83,244 122 41G 2/11/1989 9/6/2004 15.6 0 10 8

Page 121: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 105

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,245 122 41G 11/25/1989 9/6/2005 15.8 0 10 83,246 122 41G 1/19/1989 9/6/2004 15.6 0 10 83,247 122 41G 7/2/1989 9/6/2004 15.2 1 10 83,248 122 41G 11/25/1989 6/10/2005 15.5 1 10 83,249 122 41G 9/12/1988 6/10/2005 16.7 1 10 83,250 122 41G 8/1/1990 9/6/2005 15.1 1 10 83,251 122 41G 2/17/1989 9/6/2004 15.6 1 10 83,252 122 41G 1/19/1989 6/10/2005 16.4 1 10 83,253 122 41G 5/29/1990 9/6/2005 15.3 1 10 83,400 125 41I 2/13/1990 6/1/2005 15.3 1 10 83,918 116 41F 7/3/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 0 10 83,919 116 41F 8/20/1990 2/20/2006 15.5 0 10 83,920 116 41F 3/11/1990 9/25/2005 15.5 0 10 83,921 116 41F 3/23/1989 6/1/2005 16.2 0 10 83,922 116 41F 4/7/1990 9/25/2005 15.5 0 10 83,923 116 41F 10/19/1988 6/1/2005 16.6 0 10 83,924 116 41F 1/28/1990 9/25/2005 15.7 0 10 83,925 116 41F 5/9/1989 6/1/2005 16.1 1 10 83,926 116 41F 8/26/1989 6/1/2005 15.8 1 10 83,927 116 41F 12/25/1988 6/1/2005 16.4 1 10 83,928 116 41F 5/26/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 1 10 83,929 116 41F 1/1/1989 6/1/2005 16.4 1 10 83,930 116 41F 1/5/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 83,931 116 41F 1/11/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 83,932 116 41F 4/5/1990 9/25/2005 15.5 1 10 83,933 116 41F 1/31/1989 6/1/2005 16.3 1 10 83,934 116 41F 8/21/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 1 10 83,935 116 41F 1/16/1990 9/25/2005 15.7 1 10 83,936 117 41F 6/20/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 83,937 117 41F 12/21/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 83,938 117 41F 8/5/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 1 10 83,939 117 41F 12/4/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 1 10 83,940 117 41F 8/18/1990 9/2/2005 15.0 1 10 83,941 117 41F 11/5/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 1 10 83,942 117 41F 9/19/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 1 10 83,943 117 41F 1/19/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 83,944 117 41F 1/19/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 83,945 117 41F 4/6/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 1 10 83,946 117 41F 8/1/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 1 10 83,947 124 41F 5/16/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 0 10 83,948 124 41F 10/14/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 0 10 83,949 124 41F 2/2/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 83,950 124 41F 1/23/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 83,951 124 41F 12/6/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 83,952 124 41F 2/4/1990 2/20/2006 16.0 0 10 83,953 124 41F 2/13/1991 9/2/2005 14.6 0 10 83,954 124 41F 7/8/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 1 10 83,955 124 41F 10/9/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 1 10 83,956 124 41F 12/4/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 1 10 83,957 124 41F 12/1/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 1 10 8

Page 122: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 106

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,958 124 41F 9/29/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 1 10 84,171 36 30H 11/12/1993 5/13/2010 16.5 1 10 84,172 36 30H 6/14/1994 5/13/2010 15.9 1 10 84,173 36 30H 6/15/1994 5/13/2010 15.9 1 10 84,500 20 32D 6/14/1993 3/22/2010 16.8 0 10 84,501 20 32D 8/10/1993 3/22/2010 16.6 1 10 85,091 39 30I 8/24/1995 8/6/2010 15.0 0 10 85,432 123 41H 8/18/1989 9/9/2004 15.1 0 10 85,433 123 41H 8/18/1989 6/1/2005 15.8 0 10 85,434 123 41H 11/7/1989 9/9/2004 14.8 0 10 85,435 123 41H 11/7/1989 6/1/2005 15.6 0 10 85,436 123 41H 12/6/1988 9/13/2004 15.8 1 10 86,228 52 32K 12/30/1993 4/29/2010 16.3 0 10 86,229 52 32K 8/14/1994 4/29/2010 15.7 0 10 86,230 52 32K 5/10/1994 4/29/2010 16.0 1 10 86,231 52 32K 10/16/1993 4/29/2010 16.5 1 10 86,232 52 32K 9/8/1993 4/29/2010 16.6 1 10 86,233 52 32K 5/23/1994 4/29/2010 15.9 1 10 86,234 52 32K 1/4/1994 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 8421 114 41D 6/8/1989 5/25/2006 17.0 0 10 9422 114 41D 3/29/1990 5/25/2006 16.2 0 10 9423 114 41D 6/8/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 0 10 9424 114 41D 3/5/1989 8/31/2004 15.5 0 10 9425 114 41D 8/19/1988 8/31/2004 16.0 0 10 9426 114 41D 9/14/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 0 10 9427 114 41D 7/18/1988 5/23/2005 16.8 0 10 9428 114 41D 1/30/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 1 10 9429 114 41D 11/7/1988 5/23/2005 16.5 1 10 9430 114 41D 7/11/1990 5/25/2006 15.9 1 10 9431 114 41D 8/30/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 1 10 9432 114 41D 3/26/1989 8/31/2004 15.4 1 10 9433 121 41D 1/27/1990 5/25/2006 16.3 0 10 9434 121 41D 11/11/1989 5/25/2006 16.5 0 10 9435 121 41D 12/7/1989 5/25/2006 16.5 0 10 9436 121 41D 12/7/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 0 10 9437 121 41D 1/27/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 9438 126 41D 6/12/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 0 10 9439 126 41D 10/1/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 1 10 9752 101 41B 1/14/1989 9/13/2004 15.7 1 10 9753 101 41B 9/1/1989 5/27/2005 15.7 1 10 91,276 54 30J 10/16/1994 11/8/2010 16.1 0 10 91,277 54 30J 1/16/1995 11/8/2010 15.8 1 10 91,340 119 41J 10/26/1988 8/31/2004 15.8 1 10 91,495 2 30G 7/8/1994 5/13/2010 15.8 0 10 91,496 2 30G 3/2/1994 5/13/2010 16.2 0 10 91,497 2 30G 5/18/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 0 10 91,498 2 30G 12/30/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 1 10 91,499 2 30G 11/26/1993 5/13/2010 16.5 1 10 91,500 2 30G 1/15/1994 5/13/2010 16.3 1 10 91,501 2 30G 1/20/1994 5/13/2010 16.3 1 10 9

Page 123: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 107

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,502 2 30G 4/25/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 1 10 96,364 41 32J 2/27/1994 4/20/2010 16.1 0 10 96,365 41 32J 10/1/1993 4/20/2010 16.6 0 10 96,506 47 32J 7/18/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 0 10 96,507 47 32J 6/9/1994 4/23/2010 15.9 0 10 96,508 47 32J 11/14/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 0 10 96,509 47 32J 8/24/1994 4/23/2010 15.7 0 10 96,510 47 32J 4/26/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 0 10 96,511 47 32J 9/4/1994 4/23/2010 15.6 0 10 96,512 47 32J 9/1/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 96,513 47 32J 5/16/1994 4/23/2010 15.9 0 10 96,514 47 32J 6/23/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 0 10 96,515 47 32J 12/9/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 96,516 47 32J 11/27/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 96,517 47 32J 6/28/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 1 10 96,518 47 32J 6/2/1994 4/23/2010 15.9 1 10 96,519 47 32J 7/13/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 1 10 96,599 48 32J 12/30/1993 5/3/2010 16.3 0 10 96,600 48 32J 5/29/1994 5/3/2010 15.9 1 10 96,601 48 32J 3/23/1994 5/3/2010 16.1 1 10 96,602 48 32J 4/3/1994 5/3/2010 16.1 1 10 96,662 41 32J 9/14/2010 0 10 91,574 14 32H 10/25/1993 4/30/2010 16.5 0 10 91,631 7 32C 12/14/1993 3/16/2010 16.3 1 10 92,312 102 41A 9/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 92,313 103 41A 7/28/1991 9/20/2006 15.1 0 10 92,314 108 41A 6/26/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 92,315 108 41A 8/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 10 92,316 108 41A 9/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 10 92,317 108 41A 12/7/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 1 10 93,134 28 30C 1/19/1994 4/30/2010 16.3 0 10 93,135 28 30C 5/6/1994 4/30/2010 16.0 1 10 93,136 28 30C 4/21/1994 4/30/2010 16.0 1 10 93,254 122 41G 5/17/1989 6/10/2005 16.1 0 10 93,255 122 41G 4/24/1989 6/10/2005 16.1 0 10 93,256 122 41G 7/17/1988 6/10/2005 16.9 0 10 93,257 122 41G 6/5/1989 6/10/2005 16.0 0 10 93,258 122 41G 5/19/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 0 10 93,259 122 41G 10/21/1988 9/6/2004 15.9 0 10 93,260 122 41G 2/11/1989 6/10/2005 16.3 0 10 93,261 122 41G 5/22/1989 6/10/2005 16.1 0 10 93,262 122 41G 7/2/1989 6/10/2005 15.9 1 10 93,263 122 41G 9/12/1988 9/6/2004 16.0 1 10 93,264 122 41G 1/19/1989 9/6/2004 15.6 1 10 93,265 122 41G 5/12/1989 6/10/2005 16.1 1 10 93,266 122 41G 2/13/1989 6/10/2005 16.3 1 10 93,267 122 41G 3/11/1989 9/6/2004 15.5 1 10 93,268 122 41G 11/10/1988 6/10/2005 16.6 1 10 93,401 125 41I 1/11/1989 6/1/2005 16.4 0 10 93,402 125 41I 3/29/1989 6/1/2005 16.2 0 10 9

Page 124: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 108

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,403 125 41I 5/1/1989 6/1/2005 16.1 0 10 93,404 125 41I 1/25/1989 6/1/2005 16.3 0 10 93,405 125 41I 5/19/1989 6/1/2005 16.0 1 10 93,658 35 30E 12/23/1993 4/9/2010 16.3 0 10 93,959 116 41F 7/8/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 0 10 93,960 116 41F 9/23/1989 9/25/2005 16.0 0 10 93,961 116 41F 7/14/1989 6/1/2005 15.9 0 10 93,962 116 41F 12/24/1988 6/1/2005 16.4 0 10 93,963 116 41F 4/5/1990 9/25/2005 15.5 0 10 93,964 116 41F 11/8/1989 2/20/2006 16.3 0 10 93,965 116 41F 5/26/1990 9/25/2005 15.3 1 10 93,966 116 41F 9/2/1990 2/20/2006 15.5 1 10 93,967 116 41F 9/2/1990 9/25/2005 15.1 1 10 93,968 116 41F 4/5/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 1 10 93,969 116 41F 4/12/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 10 93,970 117 41F 5/7/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 0 10 93,971 117 41F 1/31/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 93,972 117 41F 6/3/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 1 10 93,973 117 41F 3/19/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 1 10 93,974 117 41F 11/15/1989 2/20/2006 16.3 1 10 93,975 117 41F 6/6/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 1 10 93,976 117 41F 1/9/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 1 10 93,977 124 41F 5/1/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 93,978 124 41F 1/23/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 0 10 93,979 124 41F 12/6/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 0 10 93,980 124 41F 4/20/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 93,981 124 41F 2/4/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 93,982 124 41F 9/18/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 0 10 93,983 124 41F 5/14/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 0 10 93,984 124 41F 7/8/1989 2/20/2006 16.6 1 10 93,985 124 41F 10/13/1989 9/2/2005 15.9 1 10 93,986 124 41F 8/16/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 1 10 93,987 124 41F 8/16/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 1 10 93,988 124 41F 2/3/1990 2/20/2006 16.0 1 10 94,174 36 30H 10/18/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 1 10 94,175 36 30H 10/15/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 1 10 94,176 36 30H 9/30/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 1 10 94,600 5 32B 12/17/1993 3/18/2010 16.2 1 10 95,437 123 41H 12/25/1988 9/9/2004 15.7 0 10 95,438 123 41H 7/29/1989 9/9/2004 15.1 1 10 95,439 123 41H 9/4/1988 9/13/2004 16.0 1 10 95,440 123 41H 9/4/1988 9/9/2004 16.0 1 10 96,235 52 32K 8/3/1994 4/29/2010 15.7 0 10 96,236 52 32K 12/26/1993 4/29/2010 16.3 0 10 96,237 52 32K 8/22/1993 4/29/2010 16.7 1 10 96,238 52 32K 1/31/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 1 10 96,239 52 32K 1/2/1995 4/29/2010 15.3 1 10 918 15 32L 2/15/1994 5/7/2010 16.2 1 10 1019 15 32L 5/2/1994 5/7/2010 16.0 1 10 10325 8 30A 6/26/1994 3/19/2010 15.7 1 10 10

Page 125: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 109

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

440 114 41D 8/18/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 0 10 10441 114 41D 3/3/1990 5/25/2006 16.2 0 10 10442 114 41D 7/13/1989 8/31/2004 15.1 0 10 10443 114 41D 3/29/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 10444 114 41D 5/5/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 1 10 10445 114 41D 9/18/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 1 10 10446 114 41D 6/9/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 1 10 10447 114 41D 3/26/1989 5/23/2005 16.2 1 10 10448 114 41D 8/22/1989 5/23/2005 15.8 1 10 10449 121 41D 11/2/1989 5/25/2006 16.6 0 10 10450 121 41D 11/2/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 0 10 10451 121 41D 9/4/1989 5/25/2006 16.7 1 10 10754 101 41B 10/3/1989 9/19/2005 16.0 0 10 101,503 2 30G 8/18/1994 5/13/2010 15.7 0 10 101,504 2 30G 10/4/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 0 10 101,505 2 30G 1/9/1994 5/13/2010 16.3 0 10 101,506 2 30G 6/14/1994 5/13/2010 15.9 0 10 101,507 2 30G 5/8/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 0 10 101,508 2 30G 12/10/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 1 10 101,509 2 30G 2/1/1994 5/13/2010 16.3 1 10 101,510 2 30G 7/26/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 1 10 101,511 2 30G 8/17/1994 5/13/2010 15.7 1 10 101,512 2 30G 11/2/1993 5/13/2010 16.5 1 10 101,513 2 30G 9/25/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 1 10 106,520 47 32J 9/29/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 0 10 106,521 47 32J 6/25/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 0 10 106,522 47 32J 5/10/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 0 10 106,523 47 32J 10/20/1994 4/23/2010 15.5 0 10 106,524 47 32J 2/13/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 0 10 106,525 47 32J 4/22/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 0 10 106,526 47 32J 4/9/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 0 10 106,527 47 32J 8/29/1994 4/23/2010 15.6 0 10 106,528 47 32J 3/16/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 106,529 47 32J 10/19/1993 4/23/2010 16.5 1 10 106,530 47 32J 11/15/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 106,531 47 32J 7/21/1994 4/23/2010 15.8 1 10 106,532 47 32J 8/16/1994 4/23/2010 15.7 1 10 106,533 47 32J 8/31/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 1 10 106,534 47 32J 2/20/1994 4/23/2010 16.2 1 10 106,603 48 32J 10/10/1993 5/3/2010 16.6 0 10 101,632 7 32C 1/26/1994 3/16/2010 16.1 0 10 101,633 7 32C 7/30/1994 3/16/2010 15.6 1 10 101,634 7 32C 9/3/1993 3/16/2010 16.5 1 10 102,318 100 41A 4/9/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 0 10 102,319 102 41A 12/30/1990 9/20/2006 15.7 0 10 102,320 108 41A 6/3/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 10 102,321 108 41A 9/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 10 102,322 110 41A 2/23/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 102,323 110 41A 2/24/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 10 102,324 110 41A 10/12/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 10 10

Page 126: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 110

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,137 28 30C 3/4/1994 4/30/2010 16.2 0 10 103,269 122 41G 5/17/1989 9/6/2004 15.3 0 10 103,270 122 41G 7/15/1989 6/10/2005 15.9 0 10 103,271 122 41G 7/15/1989 9/6/2004 15.1 0 10 103,272 122 41G 5/22/1989 9/6/2004 15.3 0 10 103,273 122 41G 12/13/1988 6/10/2005 16.5 0 10 103,274 122 41G 6/10/1988 9/6/2004 16.2 0 10 103,275 122 41G 9/4/1989 9/6/2005 16.0 1 10 103,276 122 41G 4/16/1990 9/6/2005 15.4 1 10 103,406 125 41I 10/22/1988 6/1/2005 16.6 0 10 103,407 125 41I 10/26/1988 6/1/2005 16.6 1 10 103,659 35 30E 9/28/1994 4/9/2010 15.5 1 10 103,989 116 41F 7/3/1990 9/25/2005 15.2 0 10 103,990 116 41F 1/13/1989 2/20/2006 17.1 0 10 103,991 116 41F 1/13/1989 9/25/2005 16.7 0 10 103,992 116 41F 12/28/1988 6/1/2005 16.4 0 10 103,993 116 41F 12/15/1988 6/1/2005 16.5 0 10 103,994 116 41F 10/12/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 0 10 103,995 116 41F 1/13/1989 6/1/2005 16.4 0 10 103,996 116 41F 6/8/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 1 10 103,997 116 41F 3/1/1989 6/1/2005 16.3 1 10 103,998 116 41F 12/28/1988 6/1/2005 16.4 1 10 103,999 116 41F 1/11/1990 9/25/2005 15.7 1 10 104,000 116 41F 3/26/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 1 10 104,001 116 41F 3/10/1989 6/1/2005 16.2 1 10 104,002 116 41F 9/5/1989 9/25/2005 16.1 1 10 104,003 117 41F 8/30/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 0 10 104,004 117 41F 10/7/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 1 10 104,005 117 41F 6/3/1989 2/20/2006 16.7 1 10 104,006 117 41F 12/4/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 1 10 104,007 117 41F 1/9/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 104,008 124 41F 1/11/1990 9/2/2005 15.6 0 10 104,009 124 41F 9/5/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 0 10 104,010 124 41F 2/2/1990 2/20/2006 16.0 0 10 104,011 124 41F 7/27/1990 9/2/2005 15.1 1 10 104,012 124 41F 6/29/1990 9/2/2005 15.2 1 10 104,177 36 30H 3/11/1994 5/13/2010 16.2 1 10 104,178 36 30H 10/29/1993 5/13/2010 16.5 1 10 104,502 20 32D 8/18/1993 3/22/2010 16.6 1 10 105,092 39 30I 9/24/1993 4/14/2010 16.6 1 10 105,441 123 41H 12/6/1988 9/9/2004 15.8 1 10 105,442 123 41H 8/24/1988 9/13/2004 16.1 1 10 106,240 52 32K 7/22/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 1 10 106,241 52 32K 4/3/1994 4/29/2010 16.1 1 10 106,242 52 32K 10/16/1993 4/29/2010 16.5 1 10 106,243 52 32K 1/14/1994 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 10452 114 41D 8/18/1989 5/25/2006 16.8 0 10 11453 114 41D 7/13/1989 5/23/2005 15.9 0 10 11454 114 41D 3/3/1989 8/31/2004 15.5 0 10 11455 114 41D 2/22/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 11

Page 127: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 111

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

456 114 41D 3/2/1990 5/25/2006 16.2 0 10 11457 114 41D 3/2/1990 9/2/2005 15.5 0 10 11458 114 41D 5/5/1990 5/25/2006 16.1 1 10 11459 114 41D 9/8/1988 5/23/2005 16.7 1 10 111,278 54 30J 11/28/1994 11/8/2010 15.9 0 10 111,514 2 30G 3/17/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 0 10 111,515 2 30G 11/1/1993 5/13/2010 16.5 1 10 111,516 2 30G 12/7/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 1 10 111,517 2 30G 4/9/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 1 10 111,518 2 30G 9/14/1993 5/13/2010 16.7 1 10 111,519 2 30G 2/26/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 1 10 111,520 2 30G 5/5/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 1 10 111,521 2 30G 12/10/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 1 10 111,522 2 30G 5/3/1994 5/13/2010 16.0 1 10 116,535 47 32J 1/4/1994 4/23/2010 16.3 0 10 116,536 47 32J 3/5/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 116,537 47 32J 1/21/1994 4/23/2010 16.3 0 10 116,538 47 32J 12/6/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 0 10 116,539 47 32J 12/31/1993 4/23/2010 16.3 0 10 116,540 47 32J 5/5/1994 4/23/2010 16.0 1 10 116,541 47 32J 9/27/1994 4/23/2010 15.6 1 10 116,542 47 32J 8/10/1993 4/23/2010 16.7 1 10 116,543 47 32J 7/27/1993 4/23/2010 16.7 1 10 116,544 47 32J 10/4/1993 4/23/2010 16.6 1 10 116,545 47 32J 1/17/1994 4/23/2010 16.3 1 10 116,604 48 32J 7/19/1994 5/3/2010 15.8 0 10 111,575 14 32H 11/18/1993 4/30/2010 16.4 1 10 112,325 100 41A 7/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 10 112,326 102 41A 7/17/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 10 112,327 102 41A 5/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 10 112,328 103 41A 7/20/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 112,329 108 41A 10/16/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 0 10 112,330 108 41A 4/14/1991 9/20/2006 15.4 1 10 112,331 110 41A 7/10/1989 9/29/2004 15.2 1 10 112,332 110 41A 2/23/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 10 113,277 122 41G 12/13/1988 9/6/2004 15.7 0 10 113,278 122 41G 6/10/1988 6/10/2005 17.0 0 10 113,279 122 41G 11/21/1989 6/10/2005 15.6 0 10 113,280 122 41G 1/19/1989 6/10/2005 16.4 0 10 113,281 122 41G 6/19/1989 9/6/2004 15.2 1 10 113,282 122 41G 2/17/1989 6/10/2005 16.3 1 10 113,283 122 41G 12/30/1988 6/10/2005 16.4 1 10 113,284 122 41G 11/1/1989 9/6/2005 15.8 1 10 113,285 122 41G 3/11/1989 6/10/2005 16.2 1 10 113,286 122 41G 5/26/1990 9/6/2005 15.3 1 10 113,287 122 41G 8/30/1990 9/6/2005 15.0 1 10 113,408 125 41I 6/6/1989 6/1/2005 16.0 0 10 114,013 116 41F 1/23/1989 6/1/2005 16.4 0 10 114,014 116 41F 10/12/1989 9/25/2005 16.0 0 10 114,015 116 41F 5/8/1990 9/25/2005 15.4 0 10 11

Page 128: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 112

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,016 116 41F 10/29/1989 9/25/2005 15.9 0 10 114,017 116 41F 4/7/1990 2/20/2006 15.9 0 10 114,018 116 41F 10/22/1990 2/20/2006 15.3 0 10 114,019 116 41F 10/22/1990 9/25/2005 14.9 0 10 114,020 116 41F 10/11/1989 9/25/2005 16.0 1 10 114,021 116 41F 7/18/1989 9/25/2005 16.2 1 10 114,022 116 41F 9/26/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 1 10 114,023 116 41F 7/9/1989 6/1/2005 15.9 1 10 114,024 116 41F 1/27/1989 6/1/2005 16.3 1 10 114,025 117 41F 6/19/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 1 10 114,026 117 41F 12/27/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 1 10 114,027 117 41F 1/24/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 1 10 114,028 117 41F 7/24/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 1 10 114,029 117 41F 7/24/1990 9/2/2005 15.1 1 10 114,030 117 41F 3/26/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 1 10 114,031 117 41F 4/24/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 1 10 114,032 124 41F 1/11/1990 2/20/2006 16.1 0 10 114,033 124 41F 9/14/1989 9/2/2005 16.0 0 10 114,034 124 41F 9/4/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 0 10 114,035 124 41F 8/24/1990 9/2/2005 15.0 0 10 114,036 124 41F 8/24/1990 2/20/2006 15.5 0 10 114,037 124 41F 10/9/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 1 10 114,038 124 41F 7/27/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 1 10 114,039 124 41F 6/29/1990 2/20/2006 15.6 1 10 114,040 124 41F 8/31/1990 9/2/2005 15.0 1 10 114,041 124 41F 8/31/1990 2/20/2006 15.5 1 10 114,503 20 32D 10/30/1993 3/22/2010 16.4 1 10 115,443 123 41H 3/24/1989 9/9/2004 15.5 1 10 116,244 52 32K 12/29/1993 4/29/2010 16.3 1 10 1120 15 32L 7/24/1993 5/7/2010 16.8 1 10 12326 8 30A 3/5/1994 3/19/2010 16.0 1 10 12460 114 41D 2/22/1990 5/25/2006 16.3 0 10 12461 114 41D 10/8/1988 5/23/2005 16.6 1 10 12462 114 41D 7/11/1990 9/2/2005 15.1 1 10 12463 114 41D 9/8/1988 8/31/2004 16.0 1 10 12464 121 41D 1/27/1990 5/25/2006 16.3 1 10 121,341 118 41J 9/17/1988 8/31/2004 16.0 0 10 121,342 119 41J 7/2/1989 8/31/2004 15.2 1 10 121,523 2 30G 3/29/1994 5/13/2010 16.1 0 10 121,524 2 30G 10/19/1993 5/13/2010 16.6 1 10 121,525 2 30G 12/17/1993 5/13/2010 16.4 1 10 121,526 2 30G 1/5/1994 5/13/2010 16.4 1 10 126,366 41 32J 11/5/1992 4/20/2010 17.5 1 10 126,546 47 32J 6/1/1995 4/23/2010 14.9 1 10 126,547 47 32J 3/27/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 1 10 126,548 47 32J 11/23/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 126,549 47 32J 3/31/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 1 10 126,550 47 32J 3/18/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 1 10 122,333 106 41A 7/20/1991 9/20/2006 15.2 0 10 122,334 108 41A 3/18/1991 9/20/2006 15.5 0 10 12

Page 129: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 113

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,335 110 41A 7/10/1989 6/2/2005 15.9 1 10 123,288 122 41G 11/21/1989 9/6/2004 14.8 0 10 123,289 122 41G 6/19/1989 6/10/2005 16.0 1 10 124,042 116 41F 6/13/1989 6/1/2005 16.0 0 10 124,043 116 41F 5/8/1990 2/20/2006 15.8 0 10 124,044 116 41F 10/29/1989 2/20/2006 16.3 0 10 124,045 116 41F 4/15/1989 6/1/2005 16.1 1 10 124,046 116 41F 9/1/1988 6/1/2005 16.7 1 10 124,047 116 41F 8/28/1989 6/1/2005 15.8 1 10 124,048 116 41F 9/16/1988 6/1/2005 16.7 1 10 124,049 116 41F 9/5/1989 2/20/2006 16.5 1 10 124,050 116 41F 9/30/1988 6/1/2005 16.7 1 10 124,051 117 41F 4/12/1990 9/2/2005 15.4 0 10 124,052 117 41F 12/27/1989 2/20/2006 16.2 1 10 124,053 117 41F 12/13/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 1 10 124,054 117 41F 6/6/1989 2/20/2006 16.7 1 10 124,179 36 30H 3/19/1994 5/13/2010 16.2 1 10 124,504 20 32D 11/2/1993 3/22/2010 16.4 0 10 125,444 123 41H 9/8/1989 9/9/2004 15.0 0 10 125,445 123 41H 9/8/1989 6/1/2005 15.7 0 10 125,446 123 41H 3/24/1989 9/13/2004 15.5 1 10 12465 114 41D 3/3/1989 5/23/2005 16.2 0 10 13466 114 41D 4/30/1990 9/2/2005 15.3 0 10 13467 114 41D 4/30/1990 5/25/2006 16.1 0 10 13468 114 41D 9/18/1989 5/25/2006 16.7 1 10 136,551 47 32J 4/3/1994 4/23/2010 16.1 0 10 136,552 47 32J 12/15/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 1 10 136,663 41 32J 9/28/1998 9/14/2010 12.0 1 10 134,055 116 41F 6/6/1989 6/1/2005 16.0 0 10 134,056 116 41F 10/11/1989 2/20/2006 16.4 1 10 134,057 116 41F 9/26/1989 9/25/2005 16.0 1 10 135,447 123 41H 8/24/1988 9/9/2004 16.0 1 10 1321 49 32L 1/29/1993 5/7/2010 17.3 0 11 0469 121 41D 12/7/1988 9/2/2005 16.7 1 11 0755 101 41B 3/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 0756 101 41B 7/10/1989 9/19/2005 16.2 0 11 0757 101 41B 8/14/1988 9/13/2004 16.1 0 11 0758 101 41B 5/4/1988 5/27/2005 17.1 0 11 0759 101 41B 6/5/1988 5/29/2006 18.0 1 11 0760 101 41B 6/5/1988 9/19/2005 17.3 1 11 0761 101 41B 7/30/1988 9/13/2004 16.1 1 11 01,576 14 32H 2/5/1993 4/30/2010 17.2 1 11 02,336 103 41A 7/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 02,337 103 41A 7/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 02,338 108 41A 12/3/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 02,339 111 41A 5/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 02,340 111 41A 11/9/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 02,341 112 41A 1/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 02,342 112 41A 11/5/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 03,138 28 30C 9/4/1992 4/30/2010 17.7 0 11 0

Page 130: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 114

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,139 28 30C 4/2/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 0 11 03,140 28 30C 12/8/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 1 11 03,141 28 30C 6/8/1993 4/30/2010 16.9 1 11 04,180 36 30H 8/10/1994 11/11/2010 16.3 1 11 05,093 39 30I 11/19/1993 8/6/2010 16.7 0 11 05,094 39 30I 5/12/1994 8/6/2010 16.2 0 11 05,095 39 30I 3/25/1994 8/6/2010 16.4 0 11 05,096 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 05,097 39 30I 10/20/1993 8/6/2010 16.8 0 11 05,098 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 11 05,099 39 30I 10/12/1992 8/6/2010 17.8 1 11 05,100 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 11 05,101 39 30I 9/21/1993 8/6/2010 16.9 1 11 05,102 39 30I 7/13/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 1 11 06,245 52 32K 12/26/1992 4/29/2010 17.3 0 11 022 15 32L 12/17/1992 5/7/2010 17.4 0 11 1470 121 41D 9/13/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 1 11 1762 101 41B 9/12/1987 9/13/2004 17.0 0 11 1763 101 41B 11/19/1987 5/27/2005 17.5 0 11 1764 101 41B 5/28/1989 5/29/2006 17.0 0 11 1765 101 41B 8/10/1987 5/27/2005 17.8 0 11 1766 101 41B 2/22/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 1767 101 41B 2/10/1987 5/27/2005 18.3 0 11 1768 101 41B 10/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 1769 101 41B 11/19/1987 9/13/2004 16.8 0 11 1770 101 41B 9/3/1987 9/13/2004 17.0 0 11 1771 101 41B 12/25/1988 9/19/2005 16.7 0 11 1772 101 41B 8/14/1988 5/27/2005 16.8 0 11 1773 101 41B 5/11/1989 9/19/2005 16.4 0 11 1774 101 41B 9/18/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 1775 101 41B 11/8/1987 9/13/2004 16.8 0 11 1776 101 41B 10/3/1988 5/29/2006 17.7 1 11 1777 101 41B 10/18/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 1 11 1778 101 41B 4/4/1988 5/29/2006 18.1 1 11 1779 101 41B 4/30/1989 5/29/2006 17.1 1 11 1780 101 41B 8/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 11 1781 101 41B 9/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 1782 101 41B 7/13/1989 9/19/2005 16.2 1 11 1783 101 41B 7/13/1989 5/29/2006 16.9 1 11 1784 101 41B 11/19/1988 9/19/2005 16.8 1 11 1785 101 41B 9/24/1988 9/19/2005 17.0 1 11 16,605 48 32J 8/9/1993 5/3/2010 16.7 0 11 11,577 14 32H 4/29/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 0 11 12,343 102 41A 6/24/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 12,344 103 41A 9/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 11 12,345 103 41A 12/10/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 12,346 103 41A 2/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 12,347 103 41A 3/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 12,348 106 41A 11/4/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 12,349 106 41A 3/9/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 11 1

Page 131: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 115

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,350 106 41A 3/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 12,351 107 41A 4/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 12,352 110 41A 2/15/1988 9/29/2004 16.6 0 11 12,353 110 41A 1/30/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 0 11 12,354 110 41A 6/18/1988 9/29/2004 16.3 0 11 12,355 111 41A 8/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 12,356 111 41A 6/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 12,357 111 41A 6/16/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 11 12,358 111 41A 6/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 12,359 111 41A 3/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 12,360 111 41A 5/22/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 12,361 111 41A 11/7/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 12,362 111 41A 12/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 12,363 112 41A 1/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 12,364 112 41A 4/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 12,365 112 41A 7/7/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 12,366 112 41A 9/20/2006 0 11 12,367 112 41A 9/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 13,083 120 41K 2/5/1988 8/30/2004 16.6 0 11 13,142 28 30C 3/9/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 0 11 13,143 28 30C 11/8/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 0 11 13,144 28 30C 4/10/1992 4/30/2010 18.1 1 11 13,290 122 41G 12/13/1987 6/10/2005 17.5 0 11 13,291 122 41G 7/17/1988 9/6/2004 16.1 0 11 13,292 122 41G 6/10/1988 9/6/2005 17.2 0 11 13,293 122 41G 5/21/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 1 11 13,294 122 41G 9/4/1988 9/6/2005 17.0 1 11 13,295 122 41G 6/21/1987 9/6/2004 17.2 1 11 13,409 125 41I 1/15/1988 6/1/2005 17.4 0 11 14,181 36 30H 9/16/1993 11/11/2010 17.2 0 11 14,182 36 30H 9/16/1993 11/11/2010 17.2 0 11 14,183 36 30H 6/22/1994 11/11/2010 16.4 0 11 14,184 36 30H 10/26/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 0 11 14,185 36 30H 1/28/1994 11/11/2010 16.8 0 11 14,186 36 30H 11/29/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 0 11 14,187 36 30H 1/13/1993 5/13/2010 17.3 0 11 14,188 36 30H 9/22/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 0 11 14,189 36 30H 5/6/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 0 11 14,190 36 30H 10/28/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 1 11 14,191 36 30H 1/17/1994 11/11/2010 16.8 1 11 14,192 36 30H 3/24/1993 5/13/2010 17.1 1 11 14,193 36 30H 7/21/1993 11/11/2010 17.3 11 15,103 39 30I 4/9/1993 8/6/2010 17.3 0 11 15,104 39 30I 4/8/1994 8/6/2010 16.3 0 11 15,105 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 15,106 39 30I 6/16/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 0 11 15,107 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 15,108 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 15,109 39 30I 2/28/1994 8/6/2010 16.4 0 11 15,110 39 30I 2/3/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 0 11 1

Page 132: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 116

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,111 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 15,112 39 30I 9/26/1994 8/6/2010 15.9 0 11 15,113 39 30I 3/3/1993 8/6/2010 17.4 0 11 15,114 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 15,115 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 15,116 39 30I 3/8/1993 8/6/2010 17.4 1 11 15,117 39 30I 5/1/1993 8/6/2010 17.3 1 11 15,118 39 30I 2/7/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 1 11 15,119 39 30I 12/14/1992 8/6/2010 17.6 1 11 15,120 39 30I 3/27/1994 8/6/2010 16.4 1 11 15,121 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 11 15,122 39 30I 6/17/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 1 11 15,123 39 30I 1/25/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 1 11 15,124 39 30I 11/18/1993 8/6/2010 16.7 1 11 15,125 39 30I 4/18/1994 8/6/2010 16.3 1 11 15,126 39 30I 8/18/1994 8/6/2010 16.0 1 11 15,127 39 30I 10/4/1993 8/6/2010 16.8 1 11 15,128 39 30I 5/13/1994 8/6/2010 16.2 1 11 15,129 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 11 15,411 3 32A 4/6/1992 3/12/2010 17.9 0 11 15,412 3 32A 6/29/1993 3/12/2010 16.7 1 11 15,448 123 41H 3/14/1988 9/9/2004 16.5 0 11 15,449 123 41H 3/24/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 0 11 16,246 50 32K 9/2/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 0 11 16,247 50 32K 1/22/1992 5/5/2010 18.3 0 11 16,248 50 32K 12/11/1992 5/5/2010 17.4 1 11 16,249 50 32K 1/5/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 1 11 16,250 50 32K 1/15/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 1 11 16,251 52 32K 2/11/1993 4/29/2010 17.2 0 11 16,252 52 32K 9/30/1992 4/29/2010 17.6 0 11 16,253 52 32K 9/7/1992 4/29/2010 17.6 0 11 123 49 32L 6/11/1993 5/7/2010 16.9 1 11 2471 114 41D 12/28/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 2472 114 41D 11/28/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 1 11 2473 121 41D 7/15/1989 9/2/2005 16.1 0 11 2474 121 41D 3/26/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 0 11 2475 121 41D 3/26/1989 9/2/2005 16.4 0 11 2476 121 41D 3/2/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 2786 101 41B 8/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 2787 101 41B 2/9/1988 9/13/2004 16.6 0 11 2788 101 41B 3/17/1988 9/13/2004 16.5 0 11 2789 101 41B 4/27/1988 9/13/2004 16.4 0 11 2790 101 41B 1/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 2791 101 41B 10/9/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 2792 101 41B 5/6/1987 9/13/2004 17.4 0 11 2793 101 41B 2/10/1987 9/13/2004 17.6 0 11 2794 101 41B 9/12/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 11 2795 101 41B 2/17/1989 9/19/2005 16.6 0 11 2796 101 41B 11/13/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 2797 101 41B 3/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 2

Page 133: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 117

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

798 101 41B 5/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 2799 101 41B 12/4/1987 9/13/2004 16.8 0 11 2800 101 41B 5/28/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 2801 101 41B 5/13/1987 9/13/2004 17.3 0 11 2802 101 41B 10/4/1988 9/19/2005 17.0 0 11 2803 101 41B 10/4/1988 5/29/2006 17.6 0 11 2804 101 41B 9/3/1987 5/27/2005 17.7 0 11 2805 101 41B 10/18/1987 5/27/2005 17.6 1 11 2806 101 41B 5/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 2807 101 41B 11/30/1987 9/13/2004 16.8 1 11 2808 101 41B 4/6/1988 9/13/2004 16.4 1 11 2809 101 41B 8/27/1986 9/13/2004 18.0 1 11 2810 101 41B 7/9/1988 9/13/2004 16.2 1 11 2811 101 41B 1/2/1989 5/29/2006 17.4 1 11 2947 113 41C 4/8/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 0 11 2948 113 41C 12/28/1987 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 2949 113 41C 3/2/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 11 2950 113 41C 2/3/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 2951 113 41C 7/24/1987 9/2/2005 18.1 0 11 2952 113 41C 1/21/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 2953 113 41C 5/7/1987 6/2/2005 18.1 1 11 2954 113 41C 5/7/1987 9/2/2005 18.3 1 11 21,343 118 41J 5/28/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 11 21,344 119 41J 1/29/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 26,606 48 32J 1/6/1994 5/3/2010 16.3 0 11 26,607 48 32J 5/16/1993 5/3/2010 17.0 0 11 21,578 14 32H 9/27/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 0 11 22,368 100 41A 11/25/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 22,369 100 41A 5/12/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 22,370 103 41A 5/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 22,371 103 41A 6/18/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 11 22,372 103 41A 1/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 22,373 103 41A 7/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 11 22,374 103 41A 10/22/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 22,375 103 41A 10/27/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 22,376 103 41A 3/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 22,377 103 41A 7/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 22,378 103 41A 11/16/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 22,379 103 41A 4/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 22,380 105 41A 7/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 11 22,381 106 41A 6/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 22,382 106 41A 7/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 22,383 106 41A 12/6/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 11 22,384 110 41A 10/9/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 22,385 110 41A 7/20/1988 9/29/2004 16.2 0 11 22,386 110 41A 6/13/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 22,387 111 41A 6/24/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 22,388 111 41A 11/14/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 22,389 111 41A 10/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 22,390 111 41A 8/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 2

Page 134: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 118

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,391 111 41A 6/9/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 11 22,392 111 41A 4/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 22,393 111 41A 1/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 22,394 111 41A 4/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 22,395 111 41A 9/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 22,396 111 41A 6/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 11 22,397 112 41A 3/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 11 22,398 112 41A 1/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 22,399 112 41A 6/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 22,400 112 41A 1/12/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 22,401 112 41A 8/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 22,402 112 41A 6/13/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 22,403 112 41A 12/5/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 22,404 112 41A 1/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 22,405 112 41A 12/2/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 22,406 112 41A 1/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 22,407 112 41A 12/5/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 22,408 112 41A 7/7/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 22,409 112 41A 12/2/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 22,410 112 41A 11/25/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 22,411 112 41A 11/5/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 22,412 112 41A 3/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 22,413 112 41A 10/12/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 1 11 22,414 112 41A 5/17/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 22,415 112 41A 11/25/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 23,084 120 41K 7/21/1988 8/30/2004 16.1 0 11 23,085 120 41K 12/26/1986 8/30/2004 17.7 1 11 23,145 28 30C 4/10/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 0 11 23,146 28 30C 7/22/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 0 11 23,147 28 30C 5/18/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 0 11 23,148 28 30C 9/17/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 1 11 23,296 122 41G 12/26/1988 9/6/2005 16.7 0 11 23,297 122 41G 7/17/1988 6/10/2005 16.9 0 11 23,298 122 41G 8/18/1987 9/6/2004 17.1 1 11 23,299 122 41G 4/28/1987 9/6/2004 17.4 1 11 23,300 122 41G 7/20/1987 6/10/2005 17.9 1 11 24,058 124 41F 4/28/1989 9/2/2005 16.3 0 11 24,194 36 30H 4/22/1994 11/11/2010 16.6 0 11 24,195 36 30H 2/18/1994 11/11/2010 16.7 0 11 24,196 36 30H 12/9/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 0 11 24,197 36 30H 12/9/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 0 11 24,198 36 30H 1/29/1992 5/13/2010 18.3 0 11 24,199 36 30H 8/29/1993 5/13/2010 16.7 0 11 24,200 36 30H 6/7/1994 11/11/2010 16.4 0 11 24,201 36 30H 6/12/1993 11/11/2010 17.4 1 11 24,202 36 30H 6/17/1994 11/11/2010 16.4 1 11 24,203 36 30H 11/20/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 1 11 24,204 36 30H 11/20/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 1 11 24,205 36 30H 9/23/1993 11/11/2010 17.1 1 11 24,206 36 30H 8/9/1994 11/11/2010 16.3 11 2

Page 135: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 119

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,505 38 32D 9/24/1992 3/22/2010 17.5 0 11 25,130 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 25,131 39 30I 11/12/1993 8/6/2010 16.7 0 11 25,132 39 30I 8/6/2010 0 11 25,133 39 30I 10/25/1993 8/6/2010 16.8 0 11 25,134 39 30I 5/18/1994 8/6/2010 16.2 0 11 25,135 39 30I 5/31/1994 8/6/2010 16.2 0 11 25,136 39 30I 9/23/1993 8/6/2010 16.9 0 11 25,137 39 30I 7/24/1993 8/6/2010 17.0 1 11 25,138 39 30I 12/14/1993 8/6/2010 16.6 1 11 25,139 39 30I 4/16/1994 8/6/2010 16.3 1 11 25,140 39 30I 6/17/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 1 11 25,141 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 11 25,142 39 30I 2/18/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 1 11 25,143 39 30I 7/12/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 1 11 25,144 39 30I 5/6/1994 8/6/2010 16.3 1 11 25,145 39 30I 9/28/1993 8/6/2010 16.9 1 11 25,146 39 30I 11/9/1993 8/6/2010 16.7 1 11 25,147 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 11 25,413 3 32A 6/9/1993 3/12/2010 16.8 0 11 25,414 3 32A 11/8/1993 3/12/2010 16.3 1 11 25,450 123 41H 11/21/1987 6/1/2005 17.5 0 11 25,451 123 41H 3/14/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 0 11 25,452 123 41H 3/24/1988 9/9/2004 16.5 0 11 25,453 123 41H 5/28/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 0 11 25,579 115 41E 3/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 0 11 26,254 50 32K 12/13/1992 5/5/2010 17.4 0 11 26,255 50 32K 10/11/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 0 11 26,256 50 32K 5/23/1993 5/5/2010 17.0 0 11 26,257 50 32K 5/12/1993 5/5/2010 17.0 0 11 26,258 50 32K 8/26/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 1 11 26,259 50 32K 1/6/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 1 11 26,260 52 32K 10/19/1992 4/29/2010 17.5 0 11 26,261 52 32K 4/11/1992 4/29/2010 18.0 0 11 26,262 52 32K 12/9/1992 4/29/2010 17.4 1 11 224 49 32L 4/2/1993 5/7/2010 17.1 1 11 325 49 32L 10/5/1992 5/7/2010 17.6 1 11 3294 30 30B 10/9/1989 9/2/2006 16.9 0 11 3295 30 30B 7/3/1990 9/2/2006 16.2 1 11 3477 114 41D 1/19/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 3478 114 41D 3/13/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 1 11 3479 114 41D 8/28/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 1 11 3480 114 41D 10/10/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 3481 121 41D 12/27/1988 9/2/2005 16.7 0 11 3482 121 41D 8/7/1989 9/2/2005 16.1 0 11 3483 121 41D 7/15/1989 5/25/2006 16.9 0 11 3484 121 41D 4/12/1989 9/2/2005 16.4 0 11 3485 121 41D 9/21/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 1 11 3812 101 41B 10/18/1988 9/13/2004 15.9 0 11 3813 101 41B 1/17/1989 9/19/2005 16.7 0 11 3

Page 136: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 120

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

814 101 41B 3/17/1988 5/27/2005 17.2 0 11 3815 101 41B 4/27/1988 5/27/2005 17.1 0 11 3816 101 41B 2/19/1989 5/29/2006 17.3 0 11 3817 101 41B 8/10/1987 9/13/2004 17.1 0 11 3818 101 41B 5/28/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 11 3819 101 41B 10/31/1987 5/27/2005 17.6 0 11 3820 101 41B 10/31/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 0 11 3821 101 41B 8/4/1989 9/19/2005 16.1 0 11 3822 101 41B 7/10/1989 5/29/2006 16.9 0 11 3823 101 41B 1/23/1988 9/13/2004 16.6 0 11 3824 101 41B 5/4/1988 9/13/2004 16.4 0 11 3825 101 41B 5/1/1988 5/27/2005 17.1 0 11 3826 101 41B 5/15/1988 9/13/2004 16.3 0 11 3827 101 41B 3/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 3828 101 41B 5/16/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 11 3829 101 41B 4/30/1989 9/19/2005 16.4 1 11 3830 101 41B 10/12/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 1 11 3831 101 41B 3/28/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 3832 101 41B 7/13/1989 5/29/2006 16.9 1 11 3833 101 41B 1/2/1989 9/19/2005 16.7 1 11 3834 101 41B 7/30/1988 5/27/2005 16.8 1 11 3955 113 41C 12/28/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 3956 113 41C 3/28/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 0 11 3957 113 41C 7/28/1987 9/2/2005 18.1 0 11 3958 113 41C 2/4/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 3959 113 41C 6/14/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 0 11 3960 113 41C 12/6/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 3961 113 41C 11/14/1987 9/2/2005 17.8 0 11 3962 113 41C 7/24/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 0 11 3963 113 41C 9/9/1987 9/2/2005 18.0 0 11 3964 113 41C 11/18/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 3965 113 41C 12/16/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 1 11 31,279 54 30J 2/2/1994 11/8/2010 16.8 1 11 31,345 118 41J 12/9/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 31,346 118 41J 12/13/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 31,347 118 41J 5/2/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 11 31,348 118 41J 4/23/1987 8/31/2004 17.4 1 11 31,349 119 41J 8/14/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 0 11 31,350 119 41J 5/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 11 31,351 119 41J 9/15/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 0 11 31,352 119 41J 4/15/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 31,353 119 41J 1/14/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 31,354 119 41J 4/23/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 31,355 119 41J 11/28/1988 8/31/2004 15.8 0 11 31,527 2 30G 4/13/1993 5/13/2010 17.1 0 11 31,528 2 30G 12/26/1992 5/13/2010 17.4 0 11 36,608 48 32J 11/25/1992 5/3/2010 17.4 0 11 36,609 48 32J 11/29/1992 5/3/2010 17.4 1 11 36,610 48 32J 9/14/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 1 11 36,611 48 32J 12/4/1992 5/3/2010 17.4 1 11 3

Page 137: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 121

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,612 48 32J 7/17/1992 5/3/2010 17.8 1 11 36,613 48 32J 5/21/1992 5/3/2010 17.9 1 11 31,579 14 32H 2/21/1993 4/30/2010 17.2 1 11 31,580 14 32H 5/24/1993 4/30/2010 16.9 1 11 31,635 7 32C 2/5/1993 3/16/2010 17.1 0 11 32,416 102 41A 4/22/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 11 32,417 103 41A 8/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 32,418 103 41A 2/22/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 32,419 103 41A 6/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 11 32,420 103 41A 3/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 32,421 103 41A 7/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 32,422 103 41A 8/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 32,423 105 41A 12/16/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 32,424 105 41A 10/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 32,425 105 41A 9/13/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 32,426 106 41A 3/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 32,427 106 41A 6/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 11 32,428 106 41A 8/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 32,429 110 41A 12/22/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 0 11 32,430 110 41A 8/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 32,431 110 41A 3/2/1988 9/29/2004 16.6 0 11 32,432 110 41A 11/14/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 0 11 32,433 110 41A 6/22/1987 9/29/2004 17.3 0 11 32,434 110 41A 1/8/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 0 11 32,435 110 41A 1/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 32,436 110 41A 6/5/1987 9/29/2004 17.3 0 11 32,437 111 41A 10/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 32,438 111 41A 3/26/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 32,439 111 41A 9/29/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 32,440 111 41A 11/30/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 32,441 111 41A 9/22/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 32,442 111 41A 6/7/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 32,443 111 41A 7/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 32,444 111 41A 6/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 32,445 111 41A 4/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 32,446 111 41A 5/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 32,447 111 41A 2/14/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 32,448 111 41A 12/14/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 32,449 111 41A 1/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 32,450 112 41A 12/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 32,451 112 41A 12/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 32,452 112 41A 8/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 32,453 112 41A 3/28/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 32,454 112 41A 5/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 32,455 112 41A 5/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 32,456 112 41A 10/28/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 32,457 112 41A 5/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 32,458 112 41A 1/24/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 32,459 112 41A 12/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 32,460 112 41A 6/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 3

Page 138: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 122

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,461 112 41A 6/13/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 32,462 112 41A 5/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 32,463 112 41A 10/16/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 32,464 112 41A 3/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 32,465 112 41A 7/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 11 33,086 120 41K 2/10/1988 8/30/2004 16.6 0 11 33,087 120 41K 7/10/1988 8/30/2004 16.1 0 11 33,088 120 41K 1/12/1988 8/30/2004 16.6 1 11 33,149 28 30C 8/3/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 0 11 33,150 28 30C 8/5/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 0 11 33,151 28 30C 6/1/1993 4/30/2010 16.9 1 11 33,152 28 30C 7/16/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 1 11 33,301 122 41G 5/26/1989 9/6/2005 16.3 0 11 33,302 122 41G 5/30/1988 6/10/2005 17.0 0 11 33,303 122 41G 5/30/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 0 11 33,304 122 41G 3/18/1989 9/6/2005 16.5 0 11 33,305 122 41G 8/14/1989 9/6/2005 16.1 1 11 33,306 122 41G 12/26/1987 9/6/2004 16.7 1 11 33,307 122 41G 3/19/1988 9/6/2005 17.5 1 11 33,308 122 41G 4/17/1987 9/6/2004 17.4 1 11 33,309 122 41G 4/10/1989 9/6/2005 16.4 1 11 33,310 122 41G 8/24/1987 6/10/2005 17.8 1 11 33,311 122 41G 8/24/1987 9/6/2004 17.0 1 11 33,312 122 41G 9/3/1987 9/6/2004 17.0 1 11 34,059 116 41F 5/7/1987 6/1/2005 18.1 0 11 34,060 116 41F 2/29/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 1 11 34,061 116 41F 4/25/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 34,062 117 41F 9/16/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 0 11 34,207 36 30H 12/9/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 0 11 34,208 36 30H 12/2/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 0 11 34,209 36 30H 7/2/1994 11/11/2010 16.4 0 11 34,210 36 30H 11/16/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 0 11 34,211 36 30H 10/9/1994 11/11/2010 16.1 0 11 34,212 36 30H 4/27/1994 11/11/2010 16.5 0 11 34,213 36 30H 8/25/1993 5/13/2010 16.7 0 11 34,214 36 30H 10/1/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 0 11 34,215 36 30H 6/11/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 0 11 34,216 36 30H 11/2/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 0 11 34,217 36 30H 12/3/1992 5/13/2010 17.4 0 11 34,218 36 30H 2/20/1994 11/11/2010 16.7 1 11 34,219 36 30H 2/5/1994 11/11/2010 16.8 1 11 34,220 36 30H 12/20/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 1 11 34,221 36 30H 7/15/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 1 11 34,222 36 30H 3/23/1994 11/11/2010 16.6 11 34,506 20 32D 11/23/1992 3/22/2010 17.3 0 11 34,507 38 32D 3/3/1993 3/22/2010 17.1 0 11 35,148 39 30I 8/31/1994 8/6/2010 15.9 0 11 35,149 39 30I 4/23/1994 8/6/2010 16.3 0 11 35,150 39 30I 6/20/1993 8/6/2010 17.1 0 11 35,151 39 30I 7/17/1994 8/6/2010 16.1 0 11 3

Page 139: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 123

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,152 39 30I 4/24/1994 8/6/2010 16.3 0 11 35,153 39 30I 4/3/1993 8/6/2010 17.3 0 11 35,154 39 30I 3/10/1994 8/6/2010 16.4 0 11 35,155 39 30I 1/22/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 0 11 35,156 39 30I 8/5/1993 8/6/2010 17.0 1 11 35,157 39 30I 4/6/1994 8/6/2010 16.3 1 11 35,415 3 32A 10/18/1991 3/12/2010 18.4 0 11 35,416 3 32A 6/9/1993 3/12/2010 16.8 0 11 35,454 123 41H 11/21/1987 9/9/2004 16.8 0 11 35,455 123 41H 10/4/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 0 11 35,456 123 41H 8/14/1987 9/9/2004 17.1 0 11 35,457 123 41H 3/2/1988 9/9/2004 16.5 0 11 35,580 115 41E 3/12/1988 6/3/2005 17.2 0 11 35,581 115 41E 8/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 0 11 35,582 115 41E 10/4/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 35,583 115 41E 3/7/1988 6/3/2005 17.2 1 11 35,584 115 41E 3/7/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 1 11 35,585 115 41E 1/20/1987 8/31/2004 17.6 1 11 36,263 50 32K 2/26/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 0 11 36,264 50 32K 9/13/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 0 11 36,265 50 32K 2/20/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 0 11 36,266 50 32K 1/29/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 0 11 36,267 50 32K 12/24/1992 5/5/2010 17.4 0 11 36,268 50 32K 11/10/1992 5/5/2010 17.5 0 11 36,269 50 32K 4/21/1992 5/5/2010 18.0 0 11 36,270 50 32K 11/12/1992 5/5/2010 17.5 1 11 36,271 50 32K 4/17/1993 5/5/2010 17.0 1 11 36,272 50 32K 9/3/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 1 11 36,273 51 32K 6/12/1993 4/29/2010 16.9 1 11 36,274 52 32K 5/25/1993 4/29/2010 16.9 0 11 36,275 52 32K 1/7/1993 4/29/2010 17.3 0 11 36,276 52 32K 7/21/1992 4/29/2010 17.8 0 11 36,277 52 32K 12/4/1992 4/29/2010 17.4 1 11 326 49 32L 1/1/1993 5/7/2010 17.3 0 11 4296 30 30B 10/21/1989 9/2/2006 16.9 0 11 4327 8 30A 10/19/1992 3/19/2010 17.4 0 11 4328 8 30A 4/27/1993 3/19/2010 16.9 0 11 4486 114 41D 8/20/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 0 11 4487 114 41D 7/9/1988 5/25/2006 17.9 0 11 4488 114 41D 6/16/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 0 11 4489 114 41D 4/9/1989 9/2/2005 16.4 0 11 4490 121 41D 4/30/1988 5/25/2006 18.1 0 11 4491 121 41D 4/30/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 11 4492 121 41D 12/27/1988 5/25/2006 17.4 0 11 4493 121 41D 10/31/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 0 11 4494 121 41D 3/5/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 0 11 4495 121 41D 11/20/1988 9/2/2005 16.8 1 11 4496 121 41D 8/21/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 1 11 4835 101 41B 10/9/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 4836 101 41B 12/8/1988 9/13/2004 15.8 0 11 4

Page 140: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 124

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

837 101 41B 10/9/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 0 11 4838 101 41B 8/4/1989 5/29/2006 16.8 0 11 4839 101 41B 5/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 4840 101 41B 11/4/1988 9/19/2005 16.9 0 11 4841 101 41B 6/21/1989 9/19/2005 16.2 0 11 4842 101 41B 10/26/1988 5/29/2006 17.6 0 11 4843 101 41B 11/18/1987 9/13/2004 16.8 1 11 4844 101 41B 10/3/1988 9/19/2005 17.0 1 11 4845 101 41B 5/21/1989 9/19/2005 16.3 1 11 4846 101 41B 8/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 4847 101 41B 10/17/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 4848 101 41B 11/17/1988 9/19/2005 16.8 1 11 4849 101 41B 8/10/1987 5/27/2005 17.8 1 11 4850 101 41B 8/10/1987 9/13/2004 17.1 1 11 4851 101 41B 4/24/1987 5/27/2005 18.1 1 11 4852 101 41B 10/5/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 4966 113 41C 1/20/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 4967 113 41C 8/24/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 0 11 4968 113 41C 9/4/1987 9/2/2005 18.0 0 11 4969 113 41C 7/9/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 0 11 4970 113 41C 1/21/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 4971 113 41C 1/8/1988 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 4972 113 41C 8/8/1987 9/2/2005 18.1 0 11 4973 113 41C 3/18/1988 6/2/2005 17.2 0 11 4974 113 41C 7/28/1987 6/2/2005 17.8 0 11 4975 113 41C 3/4/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 0 11 4976 113 41C 12/8/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 4977 113 41C 1/20/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 1 11 4978 113 41C 1/20/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 1 11 4979 113 41C 2/25/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 1 11 4980 113 41C 10/6/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 1 11 4981 113 41C 7/21/1987 9/2/2005 18.1 1 11 4982 113 41C 12/4/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 1 11 4983 113 41C 6/30/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 1 11 4984 113 41C 7/7/1987 9/2/2005 18.2 1 11 41,280 54 30J 3/17/1993 11/8/2010 17.6 0 11 41,281 54 30J 12/5/1993 11/8/2010 16.9 1 11 41,356 118 41J 12/6/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 41,357 118 41J 1/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 41,358 118 41J 9/10/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 1 11 41,359 118 41J 12/31/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 41,360 118 41J 11/23/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 1 11 41,361 119 41J 2/7/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 41,362 119 41J 3/23/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 41,363 119 41J 10/8/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 41,364 119 41J 1/17/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 41,365 119 41J 1/7/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 41,366 119 41J 4/14/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 1 11 41,529 2 30G 10/26/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 0 11 46,367 41 32J 2/18/1993 4/20/2010 17.2 0 11 4

Page 141: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 125

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,553 47 32J 10/19/1992 4/23/2010 17.5 0 11 46,554 47 32J 7/29/1993 4/23/2010 16.7 0 11 46,555 47 32J 9/2/1992 4/23/2010 17.6 1 11 46,614 48 32J 3/3/1993 5/3/2010 17.2 0 11 46,615 48 32J 9/28/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 0 11 46,616 48 32J 8/31/1993 5/3/2010 16.7 0 11 46,617 48 32J 10/20/1992 5/3/2010 17.5 1 11 46,618 48 32J 3/25/1993 5/3/2010 17.1 1 11 46,619 48 32J 8/12/1992 5/3/2010 17.7 1 11 41,581 14 32H 10/3/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 0 11 41,636 7 32C 11/9/1992 3/16/2010 17.3 0 11 42,466 102 41A 10/12/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 1 11 42,467 103 41A 2/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 42,468 103 41A 8/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 42,469 103 41A 8/17/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 11 42,470 103 41A 11/12/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 42,471 103 41A 9/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 42,472 105 41A 9/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 11 42,473 105 41A 7/11/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 11 42,474 106 41A 2/14/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 42,475 106 41A 2/12/1988 9/20/2006 18.6 1 11 42,476 108 41A 8/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 42,477 110 41A 1/4/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 0 11 42,478 110 41A 2/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 42,479 110 41A 2/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 42,480 110 41A 11/14/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 42,481 110 41A 6/5/1987 6/2/2005 18.0 0 11 42,482 110 41A 9/24/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 0 11 42,483 110 41A 8/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 42,484 110 41A 10/9/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 42,485 110 41A 2/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 42,486 110 41A 7/28/1988 9/29/2004 16.2 1 11 42,487 110 41A 9/23/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 1 11 42,488 110 41A 8/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 42,489 110 41A 7/28/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 1 11 42,490 110 41A 6/13/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 42,491 111 41A 12/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 42,492 111 41A 9/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 42,493 111 41A 10/11/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 42,494 111 41A 1/9/1989 9/20/2006 17.7 0 11 42,495 111 41A 9/8/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 42,496 111 41A 4/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 42,497 111 41A 2/20/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 11 42,498 111 41A 2/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 42,499 111 41A 8/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 11 42,500 111 41A 3/12/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 42,501 111 41A 6/17/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 42,502 111 41A 6/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 42,503 111 41A 4/24/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 11 42,504 111 41A 11/30/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 4

Page 142: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 126

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,505 111 41A 8/2/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 42,506 111 41A 10/28/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 42,507 111 41A 5/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 42,508 111 41A 4/12/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 42,509 112 41A 10/13/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 42,510 112 41A 8/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 42,511 112 41A 11/8/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 42,512 112 41A 5/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 42,513 112 41A 4/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 42,514 112 41A 4/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 42,515 112 41A 6/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 42,516 112 41A 11/6/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 42,517 112 41A 6/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 42,518 112 41A 6/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 42,519 112 41A 12/7/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 11 42,520 112 41A 1/16/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 42,521 112 41A 3/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 43,089 120 41K 1/5/1988 8/30/2004 16.7 0 11 43,090 120 41K 6/23/1987 8/30/2004 17.2 0 11 43,091 120 41K 8/28/1987 8/30/2004 17.0 1 11 43,153 28 30C 10/16/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 0 11 43,154 28 30C 9/24/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 0 11 43,155 28 30C 10/11/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 0 11 43,156 28 30C 12/17/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 1 11 43,157 28 30C 10/15/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 1 11 43,158 28 30C 12/12/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 1 11 43,159 28 30C 10/25/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 1 11 43,160 28 30C 4/18/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 1 11 43,161 28 30C 3/11/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 1 11 43,313 122 41G 9/3/1987 9/6/2004 17.0 0 11 43,314 122 41G 8/5/1989 9/6/2005 16.1 0 11 43,315 122 41G 1/31/1989 9/6/2005 16.6 0 11 43,316 122 41G 4/28/1988 9/6/2004 16.4 0 11 43,317 122 41G 6/27/1989 9/6/2005 16.2 0 11 43,318 122 41G 3/23/1988 9/6/2004 16.5 0 11 43,319 122 41G 4/24/1988 9/6/2004 16.4 0 11 43,320 122 41G 8/25/1988 9/6/2004 16.0 0 11 43,321 122 41G 7/13/1987 9/6/2004 17.2 0 11 43,322 122 41G 7/13/1987 6/10/2005 17.9 0 11 43,323 122 41G 12/26/1987 9/6/2004 16.7 0 11 43,324 122 41G 7/30/1987 6/10/2005 17.9 0 11 43,325 122 41G 7/30/1987 9/6/2004 17.1 0 11 43,326 122 41G 11/24/1987 9/6/2004 16.8 0 11 43,327 122 41G 1/16/1988 9/6/2004 16.6 0 11 43,328 122 41G 5/27/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 1 11 43,329 122 41G 8/14/1988 9/6/2005 17.1 1 11 43,330 122 41G 4/22/1988 9/6/2004 16.4 1 11 43,331 122 41G 7/20/1989 9/6/2005 16.1 1 11 43,332 122 41G 5/8/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 1 11 43,333 122 41G 5/3/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 1 11 4

Page 143: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 127

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,334 122 41G 9/12/1987 9/6/2004 17.0 1 11 43,335 122 41G 4/17/1987 6/10/2005 18.1 1 11 43,410 125 41I 10/20/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 0 11 43,411 125 41I 5/30/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 1 11 43,412 125 41I 8/25/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 1 11 43,413 125 41I 5/16/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 1 11 43,414 125 41I 8/11/1988 6/1/2005 16.8 1 11 44,063 116 41F 9/16/1988 2/20/2006 17.4 0 11 44,064 116 41F 6/29/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 1 11 44,065 116 41F 9/29/1987 6/1/2005 17.7 1 11 44,223 36 30H 12/2/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 0 11 44,224 36 30H 3/27/1994 11/11/2010 16.6 0 11 44,225 36 30H 3/11/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 0 11 44,226 36 30H 2/18/1992 5/13/2010 18.2 0 11 44,227 36 30H 3/4/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 0 11 44,228 36 30H 11/11/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 0 11 44,229 36 30H 6/1/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 0 11 44,230 36 30H 11/27/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 0 11 44,231 36 30H 7/30/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 0 11 44,232 36 30H 10/17/1993 11/11/2010 17.1 1 11 44,233 36 30H 3/20/1994 11/11/2010 16.6 1 11 44,234 36 30H 2/7/1994 11/11/2010 16.8 1 11 44,235 36 30H 1/22/1993 5/13/2010 17.3 1 11 44,236 36 30H 9/11/1992 5/13/2010 17.7 1 11 44,237 36 30H 12/7/1992 5/13/2010 17.4 1 11 44,508 38 32D 10/7/1992 3/22/2010 17.5 1 11 45,158 39 30I 3/27/1994 8/6/2010 16.4 0 11 45,159 39 30I 12/24/1992 8/6/2010 17.6 0 11 45,160 39 30I 2/6/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 0 11 45,206 19 32M 9/23/1992 3/26/2010 17.5 0 11 45,207 19 32M 6/13/1992 3/26/2010 17.8 0 11 45,208 19 32M 9/26/1991 3/26/2010 18.5 1 11 45,417 3 32A 11/20/1992 3/12/2010 17.3 0 11 45,458 123 41H 10/24/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 0 11 45,459 123 41H 7/26/1987 6/1/2005 17.9 0 11 45,460 123 41H 2/13/1988 9/9/2004 16.6 0 11 45,461 123 41H 5/28/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 0 11 45,462 123 41H 3/12/1988 9/9/2004 16.5 0 11 45,463 123 41H 1/26/1988 9/9/2004 16.6 1 11 45,586 115 41E 3/6/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 0 11 45,587 115 41E 10/3/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 45,588 115 41E 11/12/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 45,589 115 41E 9/1/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 0 11 45,590 115 41E 10/4/1987 6/3/2005 17.7 0 11 46,278 50 32K 9/2/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 0 11 46,279 50 32K 11/16/1992 5/5/2010 17.5 0 11 46,280 50 32K 9/19/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 0 11 46,281 50 32K 3/24/1993 5/5/2010 17.1 1 11 46,282 50 32K 3/16/1993 5/5/2010 17.1 1 11 46,283 50 32K 2/4/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 1 11 4

Page 144: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 128

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,284 52 32K 6/14/1993 4/29/2010 16.9 0 11 46,285 52 32K 2/10/1993 4/29/2010 17.2 1 11 46,286 52 32K 6/30/1992 4/29/2010 17.8 1 11 427 15 32L 11/15/1992 5/7/2010 17.5 0 11 528 49 32L 1/26/1993 5/7/2010 17.3 0 11 5297 30 30B 3/2/1994 9/3/2010 16.5 0 11 5329 8 30A 2/5/1993 3/19/2010 17.1 0 11 5330 8 30A 1/22/1993 3/19/2010 17.2 0 11 5331 8 30A 8/4/1993 3/19/2010 16.6 1 11 5497 114 41D 6/16/1989 5/25/2006 16.9 0 11 5498 114 41D 1/6/1988 5/23/2005 17.4 0 11 5499 114 41D 1/6/1988 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 5500 114 41D 10/7/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 0 11 5501 114 41D 1/19/1988 5/23/2005 17.3 0 11 5502 114 41D 4/9/1989 5/25/2006 17.1 0 11 5503 114 41D 7/23/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 1 11 5504 114 41D 10/27/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 1 11 5505 114 41D 10/7/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 5506 121 41D 9/15/1988 5/25/2006 17.7 0 11 5507 121 41D 5/8/1989 5/25/2006 17.0 0 11 5508 121 41D 4/27/1989 9/2/2005 16.4 0 11 5509 121 41D 7/13/1989 5/25/2006 16.9 0 11 5510 121 41D 5/6/1989 9/2/2005 16.3 0 11 5511 121 41D 2/14/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 5512 121 41D 6/23/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 1 11 5513 121 41D 6/29/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 1 11 5514 126 41D 12/18/1988 9/2/2005 16.7 0 11 5515 126 41D 1/16/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 1 11 5516 126 41D 8/9/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 1 11 5853 101 41B 12/7/1989 9/19/2005 15.8 0 11 5854 101 41B 1/22/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 5855 101 41B 6/21/1989 5/29/2006 16.9 0 11 5856 101 41B 1/23/1988 5/27/2005 17.3 0 11 5857 101 41B 10/12/1987 5/27/2005 17.6 1 11 5858 101 41B 10/30/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 5859 101 41B 2/27/1989 5/29/2006 17.2 1 11 5860 101 41B 9/24/1988 5/29/2006 17.7 1 11 5861 101 41B 10/1/1988 9/19/2005 17.0 1 11 5862 101 41B 6/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 5863 101 41B 2/27/1989 9/19/2005 16.6 1 11 5985 113 41C 5/10/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 11 5986 113 41C 7/9/1987 9/2/2005 18.2 0 11 5987 113 41C 1/17/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 5988 113 41C 3/18/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 0 11 5989 113 41C 3/28/1988 6/2/2005 17.2 0 11 5990 113 41C 12/6/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 5991 113 41C 5/16/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 0 11 5992 113 41C 11/18/1987 9/2/2005 17.8 0 11 5993 113 41C 3/20/1987 9/2/2005 18.5 1 11 5994 113 41C 2/21/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 1 11 5

Page 145: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 129

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

995 113 41C 7/27/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 1 11 5996 113 41C 7/21/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 1 11 5997 113 41C 2/27/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 1 11 5998 113 41C 7/7/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 1 11 51,282 54 30J 5/20/1994 11/8/2010 16.5 0 11 51,367 118 41J 5/13/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 0 11 51,368 118 41J 3/14/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 0 11 51,369 118 41J 11/3/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 51,370 118 41J 4/24/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 51,371 118 41J 1/28/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 51,372 119 41J 8/3/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 0 11 51,373 119 41J 5/29/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 11 51,374 119 41J 8/22/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 0 11 51,375 119 41J 3/29/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 51,376 119 41J 5/8/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 11 51,377 119 41J 8/7/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 0 11 51,378 119 41J 10/29/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 51,379 119 41J 4/21/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 51,380 119 41J 10/17/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 51,530 2 30G 11/23/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 0 11 51,531 2 30G 9/25/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 1 11 51,532 2 30G 6/15/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 1 11 51,533 2 30G 8/31/1992 5/13/2010 17.7 1 11 56,556 47 32J 11/20/1993 4/23/2010 16.4 0 11 56,620 48 32J 3/21/1993 5/3/2010 17.1 0 11 56,621 48 32J 2/16/1993 5/3/2010 17.2 0 11 56,622 48 32J 4/13/1992 5/3/2010 18.1 1 11 56,623 48 32J 7/9/1992 5/3/2010 17.8 1 11 56,624 48 32J 5/31/1993 5/3/2010 16.9 1 11 56,625 48 32J 3/27/1993 5/3/2010 17.1 1 11 51,582 14 32H 10/23/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 1 11 51,583 14 32H 12/15/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 1 11 51,584 14 32H 9/29/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 1 11 51,637 7 32C 9/29/1992 3/16/2010 17.5 0 11 52,522 103 41A 12/9/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 52,523 103 41A 4/12/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 52,524 103 41A 3/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 52,525 103 41A 4/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 52,526 103 41A 9/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 52,527 103 41A 10/18/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 52,528 103 41A 9/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 52,529 103 41A 3/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 52,530 103 41A 5/31/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 52,531 104 41A 7/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 52,532 106 41A 1/14/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 52,533 106 41A 12/5/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 52,534 106 41A 9/22/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 52,535 106 41A 11/14/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 52,536 110 41A 1/8/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 0 11 52,537 110 41A 10/1/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 0 11 5

Page 146: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 130

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,538 110 41A 6/8/1988 9/29/2004 16.3 0 11 52,539 110 41A 5/26/1988 9/29/2004 16.3 0 11 52,540 110 41A 5/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 11 52,541 110 41A 8/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 52,542 110 41A 11/12/1987 6/2/2005 17.6 1 11 52,543 110 41A 1/31/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 1 11 52,544 110 41A 12/3/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 1 11 52,545 110 41A 9/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 52,546 110 41A 2/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 52,547 111 41A 10/27/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 52,548 111 41A 4/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 11 52,549 111 41A 10/17/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 52,550 111 41A 11/8/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 52,551 111 41A 1/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 52,552 111 41A 3/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 52,553 111 41A 9/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 52,554 111 41A 6/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 52,555 111 41A 8/24/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 11 52,556 111 41A 9/29/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 52,557 111 41A 5/14/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 52,558 112 41A 5/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 52,559 112 41A 7/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 52,560 112 41A 9/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 52,561 112 41A 3/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 52,562 112 41A 10/22/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 52,563 112 41A 5/1/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 52,564 112 41A 8/24/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 11 52,565 112 41A 6/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 52,566 112 41A 10/13/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 52,567 112 41A 3/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 11 52,568 112 41A 9/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 52,569 112 41A 6/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 52,570 112 41A 12/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 52,571 112 41A 5/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 52,572 112 41A 10/28/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 52,573 112 41A 9/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 11 52,574 112 41A 2/7/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 52,575 112 41A 7/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 52,576 112 41A 6/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 52,577 112 41A 2/7/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 53,092 120 41K 7/27/1988 8/30/2004 16.1 0 11 53,093 120 41K 4/2/1987 8/30/2004 17.4 0 11 53,094 120 41K 4/2/1987 8/30/2004 17.4 0 11 53,095 120 41K 4/17/1988 8/30/2004 16.4 0 11 53,096 120 41K 4/7/1987 8/30/2004 17.4 1 11 53,162 28 30C 2/15/1993 4/30/2010 17.2 0 11 53,163 28 30C 9/22/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 0 11 53,164 28 30C 10/1/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 0 11 53,165 28 30C 8/11/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 0 11 53,166 28 30C 7/29/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 1 11 5

Page 147: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 131

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,167 28 30C 8/4/1992 4/30/2010 17.7 1 11 53,168 28 30C 11/13/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 1 11 53,336 122 41G 9/3/1987 6/10/2005 17.8 0 11 53,337 122 41G 4/24/1988 6/10/2005 17.1 0 11 53,338 122 41G 5/15/1989 9/6/2005 16.3 0 11 53,339 122 41G 9/16/1987 9/6/2004 17.0 1 11 53,340 122 41G 1/30/1988 9/6/2004 16.6 1 11 53,341 122 41G 3/3/1988 9/6/2004 16.5 1 11 53,415 125 41I 4/27/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 0 11 53,416 125 41I 1/7/1988 6/1/2005 17.4 0 11 53,417 125 41I 6/19/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 1 11 54,066 116 41F 5/10/1988 9/25/2005 17.4 0 11 54,067 116 41F 9/15/1987 6/1/2005 17.7 1 11 54,068 116 41F 7/23/1987 6/1/2005 17.9 1 11 54,069 117 41F 10/30/1988 9/2/2005 16.8 0 11 54,238 36 30H 10/5/1993 11/11/2010 17.1 0 11 54,239 36 30H 9/17/1994 11/11/2010 16.2 0 11 54,240 36 30H 4/21/1993 5/13/2010 17.1 0 11 54,241 36 30H 2/20/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 0 11 54,242 36 30H 3/29/1994 11/11/2010 16.6 1 11 54,243 36 30H 6/14/1994 11/11/2010 16.4 1 11 54,244 36 30H 9/30/1993 11/11/2010 17.1 1 11 54,245 36 30H 5/23/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 1 11 54,246 36 30H 6/12/1992 5/13/2010 17.9 1 11 54,247 36 30H 11/6/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 1 11 54,248 36 30H 11/17/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 1 11 54,509 20 32D 7/19/1993 3/22/2010 16.7 0 11 54,510 38 32D 3/15/1993 3/22/2010 17.0 0 11 54,511 38 32D 9/18/1992 3/22/2010 17.5 0 11 55,161 39 30I 5/28/1994 8/6/2010 16.2 0 11 55,162 39 30I 12/27/1993 8/6/2010 16.6 1 11 55,163 39 30I 9/7/1993 8/6/2010 16.9 1 11 55,164 39 30I 2/13/1996 8/6/2010 14.5 1 11 55,165 39 30I 4/12/1993 8/6/2010 17.3 1 11 55,209 19 32M 6/24/1993 3/26/2010 16.8 0 11 55,418 3 32A 7/9/1993 3/12/2010 16.7 1 11 55,419 3 32A 6/4/1993 3/12/2010 16.8 1 11 55,464 123 41H 10/4/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 0 11 55,465 123 41H 9/29/1987 6/1/2005 17.7 0 11 55,466 123 41H 8/14/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 0 11 55,467 123 41H 10/5/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 1 11 55,468 123 41H 10/5/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 1 11 55,591 115 41E 6/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 0 11 55,592 115 41E 6/29/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 0 11 55,593 115 41E 7/28/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 0 11 55,594 115 41E 3/22/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 1 11 55,595 115 41E 12/5/1987 6/3/2005 17.5 1 11 55,596 115 41E 12/5/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 55,597 115 41E 9/12/1988 6/3/2005 16.7 1 11 55,598 115 41E 9/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.0 1 11 5

Page 148: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 132

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,287 50 32K 4/16/1993 5/5/2010 17.1 0 11 56,288 50 32K 7/20/1992 5/5/2010 17.8 0 11 56,289 50 32K 6/12/1992 5/5/2010 17.9 1 11 56,290 50 32K 5/6/1992 5/5/2010 18.0 1 11 56,291 50 32K 6/25/1993 5/5/2010 16.9 1 11 56,292 50 32K 11/23/1992 5/5/2010 17.4 1 11 56,293 50 32K 2/11/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 1 11 56,294 50 32K 3/26/1993 5/5/2010 17.1 1 11 56,295 52 32K 5/24/1993 4/29/2010 16.9 0 11 56,296 52 32K 6/10/1992 4/29/2010 17.9 1 11 56,297 52 32K 6/15/1992 4/29/2010 17.9 1 11 56,298 52 32K 8/21/1992 4/29/2010 17.7 1 11 56,299 52 32K 9/18/1992 4/29/2010 17.6 1 11 56,300 52 32K 1/21/1993 4/29/2010 17.3 1 11 529 15 32L 10/9/1992 5/7/2010 17.6 0 11 630 15 32L 8/3/1992 5/7/2010 17.8 0 11 631 15 32L 11/2/1992 5/7/2010 17.5 1 11 632 15 32L 8/5/1992 5/7/2010 17.8 1 11 633 15 32L 9/15/1992 5/7/2010 17.6 1 11 634 49 32L 11/27/1992 5/7/2010 17.4 0 11 635 49 32L 4/22/1993 5/7/2010 17.0 1 11 636 49 32L 1/14/1993 5/7/2010 17.3 1 11 6332 8 30A 10/20/1992 3/19/2010 17.4 0 11 6517 114 41D 4/22/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 6518 114 41D 8/20/1987 5/23/2005 17.8 0 11 6519 114 41D 4/8/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 6520 114 41D 7/9/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 0 11 6521 114 41D 12/28/1987 5/23/2005 17.4 0 11 6522 114 41D 10/2/1986 5/23/2005 18.6 0 11 6523 114 41D 8/16/1988 5/23/2005 16.8 0 11 6524 114 41D 10/12/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 6525 114 41D 11/28/1987 5/23/2005 17.5 1 11 6526 114 41D 4/13/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 1 11 6527 114 41D 8/6/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 1 11 6528 114 41D 8/18/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 1 11 6529 121 41D 1/1/1989 9/2/2005 16.7 0 11 6530 121 41D 2/10/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 0 11 6531 121 41D 11/20/1988 5/25/2006 17.5 1 11 6532 121 41D 4/21/1989 9/2/2005 16.4 1 11 6533 121 41D 4/21/1989 5/25/2006 17.1 1 11 6534 121 41D 9/21/1988 5/25/2006 17.7 1 11 6535 126 41D 3/9/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 6864 101 41B 3/22/1988 5/27/2005 17.2 0 11 6865 101 41B 3/22/1988 9/13/2004 16.5 0 11 6866 101 41B 12/7/1989 5/29/2006 16.5 0 11 6867 101 41B 10/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 6868 101 41B 4/24/1987 9/13/2004 17.4 1 11 6999 113 41C 9/4/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 61,000 113 41C 5/9/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 11 61,001 113 41C 1/21/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 6

Page 149: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 133

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,002 113 41C 4/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 0 11 61,003 113 41C 3/21/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 0 11 61,004 113 41C 5/31/1987 6/2/2005 18.0 0 11 61,005 113 41C 5/31/1987 9/2/2005 18.3 0 11 61,006 113 41C 9/12/1987 9/2/2005 18.0 0 11 61,007 113 41C 1/12/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 61,008 113 41C 1/12/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 61,009 113 41C 1/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 61,010 113 41C 8/8/1987 6/2/2005 17.8 0 11 61,011 113 41C 3/4/1988 6/2/2005 17.2 0 11 61,012 113 41C 6/15/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 0 11 61,013 113 41C 4/12/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 0 11 61,014 113 41C 9/19/1987 9/2/2005 18.0 1 11 61,015 113 41C 3/20/1987 6/2/2005 18.2 1 11 61,016 113 41C 8/27/1987 9/2/2005 18.0 1 11 61,017 113 41C 7/4/1988 6/2/2005 16.9 1 11 61,018 113 41C 5/30/1987 9/2/2005 18.3 1 11 61,019 113 41C 5/25/1987 9/2/2005 18.3 1 11 61,020 113 41C 10/27/1989 9/2/2005 15.8 1 11 61,021 113 41C 7/27/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 1 11 61,022 113 41C 5/10/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 1 11 61,023 113 41C 5/1/1987 9/2/2005 18.3 1 11 61,024 113 41C 2/27/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 61,025 113 41C 6/21/1987 9/2/2005 18.2 1 11 61,381 118 41J 11/16/1988 8/31/2004 15.8 0 11 61,382 118 41J 3/8/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 0 11 61,383 118 41J 6/27/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 0 11 61,384 118 41J 11/14/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 61,385 118 41J 6/28/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 0 11 61,386 118 41J 1/6/1988 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 61,387 118 41J 8/13/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 1 11 61,388 119 41J 11/7/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 61,389 119 41J 4/4/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 61,390 119 41J 2/9/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 61,391 119 41J 5/20/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 1 11 61,534 2 30G 3/3/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 1 11 61,535 2 30G 8/2/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 1 11 66,368 41 32J 7/31/1993 4/20/2010 16.7 0 11 66,557 47 32J 12/27/1992 4/23/2010 17.3 0 11 66,558 47 32J 5/5/1993 4/23/2010 17.0 1 11 66,559 47 32J 12/7/1992 4/23/2010 17.4 1 11 66,626 48 32J 10/10/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 0 11 66,627 48 32J 1/11/1993 5/3/2010 17.3 0 11 66,628 48 32J 9/18/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 1 11 66,629 48 32J 4/2/1993 5/3/2010 17.1 1 11 66,664 41 32J 11/6/1997 9/14/2010 12.9 0 11 61,585 14 32H 2/18/1993 4/30/2010 17.2 0 11 61,586 14 32H 12/29/1992 4/30/2010 17.3 0 11 61,587 14 32H 4/17/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 0 11 61,638 7 32C 3/25/1993 3/16/2010 17.0 0 11 6

Page 150: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 134

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,639 7 32C 1/8/1993 3/16/2010 17.2 0 11 61,640 7 32C 11/24/1992 3/16/2010 17.3 0 11 61,641 7 32C 3/27/1993 3/16/2010 17.0 0 11 61,642 7 32C 11/4/1992 3/16/2010 17.4 1 11 62,578 103 41A 11/25/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 62,579 103 41A 4/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 62,580 103 41A 9/13/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 11 62,581 103 41A 8/1/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 62,582 106 41A 5/14/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 62,583 106 41A 2/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 62,584 110 41A 12/18/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 0 11 62,585 110 41A 5/22/1991 9/20/2006 15.3 0 11 62,586 110 41A 8/15/1988 9/29/2004 16.1 0 11 62,587 110 41A 1/4/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 62,588 110 41A 9/24/1988 9/29/2004 16.0 0 11 62,589 110 41A 8/2/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 0 11 62,590 110 41A 10/1/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 62,591 110 41A 2/2/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 0 11 62,592 110 41A 7/20/1988 6/2/2005 16.9 0 11 62,593 110 41A 10/29/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 0 11 62,594 110 41A 5/18/1988 9/29/2004 16.4 0 11 62,595 110 41A 10/11/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 62,596 110 41A 4/24/1988 9/29/2004 16.4 0 11 62,597 110 41A 2/2/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 0 11 62,598 110 41A 1/26/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 0 11 62,599 110 41A 2/2/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 11 62,600 110 41A 5/26/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 0 11 62,601 110 41A 10/4/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 0 11 62,602 110 41A 10/2/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 0 11 62,603 110 41A 10/2/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 62,604 110 41A 12/8/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 0 11 62,605 110 41A 9/24/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 62,606 110 41A 2/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 62,607 110 41A 11/12/1987 6/2/2005 17.6 1 11 62,608 110 41A 1/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 62,609 110 41A 9/23/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 1 11 62,610 110 41A 12/5/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 1 11 62,611 110 41A 12/5/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 1 11 62,612 110 41A 2/27/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 62,613 110 41A 6/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 62,614 110 41A 8/27/1987 6/2/2005 17.8 1 11 62,615 110 41A 11/17/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 62,616 110 41A 10/27/1987 6/2/2005 17.6 1 11 62,617 110 41A 1/31/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 62,618 110 41A 9/29/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 1 11 62,619 110 41A 6/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 62,620 111 41A 1/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 62,621 111 41A 10/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 62,622 111 41A 1/31/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 62,623 111 41A 1/16/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 6

Page 151: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 135

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,624 111 41A 4/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 62,625 111 41A 1/31/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 62,626 111 41A 12/26/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 62,627 111 41A 7/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 11 62,628 111 41A 5/17/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 62,629 111 41A 5/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 11 62,630 111 41A 10/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 62,631 112 41A 10/1/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 62,632 112 41A 12/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 62,633 112 41A 2/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 62,634 112 41A 3/28/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 62,635 112 41A 11/8/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 62,636 112 41A 3/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 62,637 112 41A 8/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 62,638 112 41A 5/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 62,639 112 41A 4/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 62,640 112 41A 6/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 62,641 112 41A 2/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 62,642 112 41A 4/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 62,643 112 41A 6/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 62,644 112 41A 1/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 63,097 120 41K 3/7/1988 8/30/2004 16.5 0 11 63,098 120 41K 3/5/1988 8/30/2004 16.5 0 11 63,099 120 41K 4/19/1988 8/30/2004 16.4 0 11 63,100 120 41K 10/12/1987 8/30/2004 16.9 1 11 63,101 120 41K 3/1/1988 8/30/2004 16.5 1 11 63,169 28 30C 6/24/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 0 11 63,170 28 30C 8/4/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 0 11 63,171 28 30C 8/5/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 0 11 63,172 28 30C 3/27/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 0 11 63,173 28 30C 7/12/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 0 11 63,174 28 30C 8/1/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 1 11 63,175 28 30C 6/4/1993 4/30/2010 16.9 1 11 63,342 122 41G 4/23/1988 9/6/2004 16.4 0 11 63,343 122 41G 9/10/1987 6/10/2005 17.7 0 11 63,344 122 41G 7/19/1987 6/10/2005 17.9 0 11 63,345 122 41G 4/28/1988 6/10/2005 17.1 0 11 63,346 122 41G 8/27/1987 9/6/2004 17.0 0 11 63,347 122 41G 3/23/1988 6/10/2005 17.2 0 11 63,348 122 41G 2/19/1988 9/6/2004 16.5 0 11 63,349 122 41G 8/15/1988 9/6/2004 16.1 0 11 63,350 122 41G 5/9/1988 9/6/2005 17.3 1 11 63,351 122 41G 4/22/1988 6/10/2005 17.1 1 11 63,352 122 41G 7/10/1986 9/6/2004 18.2 1 11 63,353 122 41G 1/30/1988 6/10/2005 17.4 1 11 63,354 122 41G 3/3/1988 6/10/2005 17.3 1 11 63,418 125 41I 9/3/1988 6/1/2005 16.7 0 11 63,419 125 41I 7/16/1987 6/1/2005 17.9 0 11 63,420 125 41I 2/7/1987 6/1/2005 18.3 1 11 63,421 125 41I 10/12/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 1 11 6

Page 152: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 136

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,422 125 41I 4/15/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 64,070 116 41F 5/27/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 64,071 116 41F 9/19/1988 9/25/2005 17.0 0 11 64,072 116 41F 10/22/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 0 11 64,073 116 41F 9/16/1988 9/25/2005 17.0 0 11 64,074 116 41F 4/29/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 64,075 116 41F 2/12/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 1 11 64,076 116 41F 11/1/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 1 11 64,077 124 41F 5/30/1989 9/2/2005 16.3 0 11 64,078 124 41F 2/9/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 0 11 64,249 36 30H 11/15/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 0 11 64,250 36 30H 9/11/1993 11/11/2010 17.2 0 11 64,251 36 30H 9/20/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 0 11 64,252 36 30H 8/7/1994 11/11/2010 16.3 1 11 64,253 36 30H 8/28/1994 11/11/2010 16.2 1 11 64,254 36 30H 11/30/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 1 11 64,255 36 30H 12/12/1992 5/13/2010 17.4 1 11 64,256 36 30H 7/1/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 1 11 64,257 36 30H 4/30/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 1 11 64,258 36 30H 9/28/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 1 11 64,259 36 30H 10/3/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 1 11 64,512 20 32D 7/1/1993 3/22/2010 16.7 1 11 64,513 38 32D 2/18/1993 3/22/2010 17.1 0 11 64,514 38 32D 6/22/1992 3/22/2010 17.7 1 11 65,166 39 30I 9/24/1994 8/6/2010 15.9 0 11 65,210 19 32M 2/18/1993 3/26/2010 17.1 0 11 65,211 19 32M 12/18/1992 3/26/2010 17.3 1 11 65,420 3 32A 7/10/1992 3/12/2010 17.7 1 11 65,421 3 32A 8/11/1993 3/12/2010 16.6 1 11 65,469 123 41H 10/24/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 0 11 65,470 123 41H 10/5/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 0 11 65,471 123 41H 2/13/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 0 11 65,472 123 41H 5/20/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 65,473 123 41H 11/19/1987 9/9/2004 16.8 0 11 65,474 123 41H 3/2/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 0 11 65,475 123 41H 9/24/1987 9/9/2004 17.0 1 11 65,476 123 41H 3/28/1987 9/9/2004 17.5 1 11 65,477 123 41H 3/28/1987 6/1/2005 18.2 1 11 65,599 115 41E 7/28/1987 6/3/2005 17.9 0 11 65,600 115 41E 7/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 1 11 66,301 50 32K 8/24/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 0 11 66,302 50 32K 1/13/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 0 11 66,303 50 32K 10/10/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 1 11 66,304 50 32K 2/24/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 1 11 66,305 50 32K 8/27/1993 5/5/2010 16.7 1 11 66,306 50 32K 11/4/1992 5/5/2010 17.5 1 11 66,307 50 32K 9/17/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 1 11 66,308 52 32K 6/29/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 0 11 66,309 52 32K 7/3/1992 4/29/2010 17.8 1 11 637 15 32L 7/22/1993 5/7/2010 16.8 0 11 7

Page 153: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 137

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,422 125 41I 4/15/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 64,070 116 41F 5/27/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 64,071 116 41F 9/19/1988 9/25/2005 17.0 0 11 64,072 116 41F 10/22/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 0 11 64,073 116 41F 9/16/1988 9/25/2005 17.0 0 11 64,074 116 41F 4/29/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 64,075 116 41F 2/12/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 1 11 64,076 116 41F 11/1/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 1 11 64,077 124 41F 5/30/1989 9/2/2005 16.3 0 11 64,078 124 41F 2/9/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 0 11 64,249 36 30H 11/15/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 0 11 64,250 36 30H 9/11/1993 11/11/2010 17.2 0 11 64,251 36 30H 9/20/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 0 11 64,252 36 30H 8/7/1994 11/11/2010 16.3 1 11 64,253 36 30H 8/28/1994 11/11/2010 16.2 1 11 64,254 36 30H 11/30/1993 11/11/2010 16.9 1 11 64,255 36 30H 12/12/1992 5/13/2010 17.4 1 11 64,256 36 30H 7/1/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 1 11 64,257 36 30H 4/30/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 1 11 64,258 36 30H 9/28/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 1 11 64,259 36 30H 10/3/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 1 11 64,512 20 32D 7/1/1993 3/22/2010 16.7 1 11 64,513 38 32D 2/18/1993 3/22/2010 17.1 0 11 64,514 38 32D 6/22/1992 3/22/2010 17.7 1 11 65,166 39 30I 9/24/1994 8/6/2010 15.9 0 11 65,210 19 32M 2/18/1993 3/26/2010 17.1 0 11 65,211 19 32M 12/18/1992 3/26/2010 17.3 1 11 65,420 3 32A 7/10/1992 3/12/2010 17.7 1 11 65,421 3 32A 8/11/1993 3/12/2010 16.6 1 11 65,469 123 41H 10/24/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 0 11 65,470 123 41H 10/5/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 0 11 65,471 123 41H 2/13/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 0 11 65,472 123 41H 5/20/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 65,473 123 41H 11/19/1987 9/9/2004 16.8 0 11 65,474 123 41H 3/2/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 0 11 65,475 123 41H 9/24/1987 9/9/2004 17.0 1 11 65,476 123 41H 3/28/1987 9/9/2004 17.5 1 11 65,477 123 41H 3/28/1987 6/1/2005 18.2 1 11 65,599 115 41E 7/28/1987 6/3/2005 17.9 0 11 65,600 115 41E 7/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 1 11 66,301 50 32K 8/24/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 0 11 66,302 50 32K 1/13/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 0 11 66,303 50 32K 10/10/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 1 11 66,304 50 32K 2/24/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 1 11 66,305 50 32K 8/27/1993 5/5/2010 16.7 1 11 66,306 50 32K 11/4/1992 5/5/2010 17.5 1 11 66,307 50 32K 9/17/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 1 11 66,308 52 32K 6/29/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 0 11 66,309 52 32K 7/3/1992 4/29/2010 17.8 1 11 637 15 32L 7/22/1993 5/7/2010 16.8 0 11 7

Page 154: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 138

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

38 15 32L 11/2/1992 5/7/2010 17.5 0 11 739 15 32L 5/25/1993 5/7/2010 17.0 1 11 740 15 32L 3/26/1993 5/7/2010 17.1 1 11 741 15 32L 11/19/1992 5/7/2010 17.5 1 11 742 49 32L 7/6/1993 5/7/2010 16.8 0 11 743 49 32L 7/27/1992 5/7/2010 17.8 1 11 7333 8 30A 2/9/1993 3/19/2010 17.1 1 11 7536 114 41D 10/7/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 0 11 7537 114 41D 10/2/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 0 11 7538 114 41D 1/12/1988 5/23/2005 17.4 0 11 7539 114 41D 12/26/1988 9/2/2005 16.7 0 11 7540 114 41D 7/11/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 1 11 7541 114 41D 9/28/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 1 11 7542 114 41D 8/16/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 1 11 7543 114 41D 8/28/1988 5/25/2006 17.7 1 11 7544 114 41D 10/7/1987 5/23/2005 17.6 1 11 7545 121 41D 4/17/1989 9/2/2005 16.4 0 11 7546 121 41D 9/15/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 0 11 7547 121 41D 5/8/1989 9/2/2005 16.3 0 11 7548 121 41D 4/27/1989 5/25/2006 17.1 0 11 7549 121 41D 2/10/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 0 11 7550 121 41D 10/31/1988 9/2/2005 16.8 0 11 7551 121 41D 10/6/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 0 11 7552 121 41D 3/11/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 0 11 7553 121 41D 5/6/1989 5/25/2006 17.1 0 11 7554 121 41D 8/12/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 1 11 7555 121 41D 11/7/1988 9/2/2005 16.8 1 11 7556 121 41D 7/8/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 1 11 7557 121 41D 1/27/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 1 11 7558 121 41D 9/21/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 1 11 7559 126 41D 1/12/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 0 11 7869 101 41B 12/20/1988 9/19/2005 16.7 0 11 7870 101 41B 2/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 7871 101 41B 3/27/1989 9/19/2005 16.5 1 11 7872 101 41B 12/17/1987 9/13/2004 16.7 1 11 71,026 113 41C 1/22/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 71,027 113 41C 1/6/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 71,028 113 41C 1/17/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 71,029 113 41C 12/16/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 71,030 113 41C 12/24/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 71,031 113 41C 9/12/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 71,032 113 41C 10/7/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 0 11 71,033 113 41C 2/4/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 11 71,034 113 41C 6/14/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 0 11 71,035 113 41C 6/20/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 0 11 71,036 113 41C 12/8/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 71,037 113 41C 11/14/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 71,038 113 41C 5/16/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 11 71,039 113 41C 9/25/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 1 11 71,040 113 41C 8/27/1987 6/2/2005 17.8 1 11 7

Page 155: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 139

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,041 113 41C 5/1/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 1 11 71,042 113 41C 5/30/1987 6/2/2005 18.0 1 11 71,043 113 41C 5/25/1987 6/2/2005 18.0 1 11 71,044 113 41C 10/11/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 1 11 71,045 113 41C 5/10/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 1 11 71,046 113 41C 5/1/1987 6/2/2005 18.1 1 11 71,047 113 41C 11/18/1987 9/2/2005 17.8 1 11 71,048 113 41C 12/19/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 1 11 71,049 113 41C 12/4/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 1 11 71,392 118 41J 10/21/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 71,393 118 41J 2/26/1987 8/31/2004 17.5 0 11 71,394 118 41J 1/25/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 71,395 118 41J 9/11/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 0 11 71,396 118 41J 5/29/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 1 11 71,397 118 41J 6/24/1987 8/31/2004 17.2 1 11 71,398 118 41J 12/10/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 71,399 118 41J 11/14/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 1 11 71,400 119 41J 11/13/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 71,401 119 41J 4/20/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 71,402 119 41J 5/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 11 71,403 119 41J 11/14/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 71,404 119 41J 12/17/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 71,405 119 41J 6/22/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 1 11 71,406 119 41J 5/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 1 11 71,407 119 41J 12/21/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 71,536 2 30G 5/21/1992 5/13/2010 18.0 0 11 71,537 2 30G 3/18/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 0 11 71,538 2 30G 1/29/1993 5/13/2010 17.3 0 11 71,539 2 30G 4/6/1993 5/13/2010 17.1 0 11 71,540 2 30G 6/22/1992 5/13/2010 17.9 1 11 76,630 48 32J 2/4/1993 5/3/2010 17.2 0 11 76,631 48 32J 10/25/1992 5/3/2010 17.5 0 11 76,632 48 32J 10/5/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 0 11 76,633 48 32J 12/7/1992 5/3/2010 17.4 0 11 76,634 48 32J 5/11/1993 5/3/2010 17.0 0 11 76,635 48 32J 7/20/1992 5/3/2010 17.8 1 11 76,636 48 32J 11/3/1992 5/3/2010 17.5 1 11 76,637 48 32J 1/19/1993 5/3/2010 17.3 1 11 76,638 48 32J 5/7/1992 5/3/2010 18.0 1 11 71,588 14 32H 11/7/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 0 11 71,589 14 32H 10/5/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 0 11 71,590 14 32H 11/25/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 0 11 71,591 14 32H 4/6/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 0 11 72,645 103 41A 6/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 72,646 103 41A 11/25/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 11 72,647 103 41A 4/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 72,648 106 41A 9/10/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 72,649 106 41A 3/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 72,650 106 41A 7/22/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 72,651 106 41A 4/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 11 7

Page 156: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 140

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,652 110 41A 8/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 72,653 110 41A 3/11/1988 9/29/2004 16.6 0 11 72,654 110 41A 6/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 72,655 110 41A 4/18/1988 9/29/2004 16.4 0 11 72,656 110 41A 6/6/1987 9/29/2004 17.3 0 11 72,657 110 41A 8/2/1988 9/29/2004 16.2 0 11 72,658 110 41A 11/25/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 0 11 72,659 110 41A 10/29/1987 6/2/2005 17.6 0 11 72,660 110 41A 7/15/1988 6/2/2005 16.9 0 11 72,661 110 41A 6/7/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 72,662 110 41A 3/2/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 11 72,663 110 41A 1/26/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 11 72,664 110 41A 5/28/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 72,665 110 41A 3/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 11 72,666 110 41A 10/11/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 11 72,667 110 41A 2/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 72,668 110 41A 11/12/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 72,669 110 41A 1/27/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 1 11 72,670 110 41A 6/2/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 1 11 72,671 110 41A 1/20/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 1 11 72,672 110 41A 8/27/1987 9/29/2004 17.1 1 11 72,673 110 41A 1/5/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 1 11 72,674 110 41A 1/5/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 1 11 72,675 110 41A 10/27/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 72,676 110 41A 7/26/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 72,677 110 41A 12/22/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 1 11 72,678 110 41A 4/18/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 1 11 72,679 110 41A 4/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 72,680 110 41A 9/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 11 72,681 110 41A 11/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 72,682 110 41A 4/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 72,683 110 41A 2/2/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 72,684 111 41A 2/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 72,685 111 41A 7/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 72,686 111 41A 11/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 72,687 111 41A 1/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 72,688 112 41A 6/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 72,689 112 41A 6/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 72,690 112 41A 8/25/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 72,691 112 41A 5/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 72,692 112 41A 10/18/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 72,693 112 41A 12/11/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 72,694 112 41A 10/18/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 72,695 112 41A 9/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 11 72,696 112 41A 7/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 73,102 120 41K 11/9/1987 8/30/2004 16.8 0 11 73,103 120 41K 5/12/1988 8/30/2004 16.3 1 11 73,104 120 41K 12/12/1987 8/30/2004 16.7 1 11 73,176 28 30C 8/14/1993 4/30/2010 16.7 0 11 73,177 28 30C 11/13/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 0 11 7

Page 157: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 141

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,178 28 30C 5/26/1993 4/30/2010 16.9 1 11 73,179 28 30C 4/13/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 1 11 73,180 28 30C 7/23/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 1 11 73,181 28 30C 10/14/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 1 11 73,355 122 41G 1/25/1988 9/6/2004 16.6 0 11 73,356 122 41G 7/19/1987 9/6/2004 17.1 0 11 73,357 122 41G 5/6/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 0 11 73,358 122 41G 8/27/1987 6/10/2005 17.8 0 11 73,359 122 41G 1/10/1989 9/6/2005 16.7 0 11 73,360 122 41G 8/15/1988 6/10/2005 16.8 0 11 73,361 122 41G 9/4/1987 9/6/2004 17.0 1 11 73,362 122 41G 9/23/1988 9/6/2005 17.0 1 11 73,363 122 41G 11/29/1988 9/6/2005 16.8 1 11 73,364 122 41G 11/23/1988 9/6/2005 16.8 1 11 73,365 122 41G 7/20/1987 9/6/2004 17.1 1 11 73,366 122 41G 9/16/1987 6/10/2005 17.7 1 11 73,367 122 41G 5/8/1988 6/10/2005 17.1 1 11 73,423 125 41I 7/10/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 0 11 73,424 125 41I 6/22/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 0 11 73,425 125 41I 5/19/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 73,426 125 41I 7/26/1988 6/1/2005 16.8 1 11 74,079 116 41F 12/3/1987 6/1/2005 17.5 0 11 74,080 116 41F 5/10/1988 2/20/2006 17.8 0 11 74,081 116 41F 4/14/1987 6/1/2005 18.1 0 11 74,082 116 41F 12/30/1987 6/1/2005 17.4 1 11 74,083 116 41F 3/22/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 1 11 74,084 124 41F 11/29/1988 9/2/2005 16.8 0 11 74,260 36 30H 10/30/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 1 11 74,261 36 30H 10/30/1993 11/11/2010 17.0 1 11 74,262 36 30H 10/5/1993 11/11/2010 17.1 1 11 74,263 36 30H 3/1/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 1 11 74,264 36 30H 10/1/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 1 11 74,515 20 32D 1/2/1993 3/22/2010 17.2 0 11 74,516 38 32D 4/20/1993 3/22/2010 16.9 0 11 75,212 19 32M 5/16/1993 3/26/2010 16.9 0 11 75,213 19 32M 7/17/1992 3/26/2010 17.7 1 11 75,422 3 32A 7/9/1993 3/12/2010 16.7 1 11 75,478 123 41H 5/20/1988 9/9/2004 16.3 0 11 75,479 123 41H 5/15/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 0 11 75,480 123 41H 3/28/1988 9/9/2004 16.5 1 11 75,481 123 41H 4/20/1988 9/9/2004 16.4 1 11 75,482 123 41H 1/26/1988 9/13/2004 16.6 1 11 75,483 123 41H 3/19/1988 9/9/2004 16.5 1 11 75,484 123 41H 12/11/1987 9/9/2004 16.7 1 11 75,485 123 41H 12/11/1987 6/1/2005 17.5 1 11 75,486 123 41H 3/27/1987 6/1/2005 18.2 1 11 75,487 123 41H 3/27/1987 9/9/2004 17.5 1 11 75,601 115 41E 6/12/1988 6/3/2005 17.0 0 11 75,602 115 41E 10/1/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 75,603 115 41E 7/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 0 11 7

Page 158: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 142

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,604 115 41E 7/9/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 0 11 75,605 115 41E 11/18/1987 6/3/2005 17.5 0 11 75,606 115 41E 11/18/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 75,607 115 41E 7/5/1988 6/3/2005 16.9 1 11 75,608 115 41E 1/20/1987 6/3/2005 18.4 1 11 76,310 50 32K 1/16/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 1 11 76,311 50 32K 10/27/1991 5/5/2010 18.5 1 11 76,312 50 32K 8/11/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 1 11 76,313 50 32K 8/22/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 1 11 76,314 51 32K 7/24/1992 4/29/2010 17.8 0 11 76,315 52 32K 12/26/1992 4/29/2010 17.3 0 11 76,316 52 32K 11/10/1992 4/29/2010 17.5 0 11 76,317 52 32K 3/5/1994 4/29/2010 16.2 0 11 744 15 32L 12/19/1992 5/7/2010 17.4 1 11 845 15 32L 8/20/1992 5/7/2010 17.7 1 11 846 49 32L 1/18/1993 5/7/2010 17.3 0 11 847 49 32L 5/27/1992 5/7/2010 17.9 1 11 848 49 32L 10/1/1992 5/7/2010 17.6 1 11 8298 30 30B 9/25/1989 9/2/2006 16.9 1 11 8334 8 30A 4/14/1993 3/19/2010 16.9 0 11 8335 8 30A 10/13/1992 3/19/2010 17.4 0 11 8560 114 41D 10/2/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 0 11 8561 114 41D 3/16/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 0 11 8562 114 41D 1/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 8563 114 41D 10/12/1987 5/23/2005 17.6 0 11 8564 114 41D 8/16/1987 5/23/2005 17.8 1 11 8565 121 41D 1/1/1989 5/25/2006 17.4 0 11 8566 121 41D 10/14/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 0 11 8567 121 41D 4/17/1989 5/25/2006 17.1 0 11 8568 121 41D 6/22/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 0 11 8569 121 41D 5/23/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 11 8570 121 41D 3/11/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 0 11 8571 121 41D 3/18/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 1 11 8572 121 41D 3/18/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 8573 121 41D 2/14/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 1 11 8574 121 41D 12/7/1988 5/25/2006 17.5 1 11 8575 121 41D 5/27/1989 9/2/2005 16.3 1 11 8576 121 41D 3/4/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 8577 121 41D 6/29/1988 5/25/2006 17.9 1 11 8578 126 41D 6/30/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 0 11 8579 126 41D 2/1/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 1 11 8873 101 41B 9/1/1989 9/19/2005 16.0 1 11 81,050 113 41C 9/23/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 81,051 113 41C 1/6/1988 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 81,052 113 41C 12/16/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 81,053 113 41C 12/24/1987 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 81,054 113 41C 12/2/1987 9/2/2005 17.8 0 11 81,055 113 41C 6/20/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 0 11 81,056 113 41C 7/20/1988 6/2/2005 16.9 0 11 81,057 113 41C 7/20/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 0 11 8

Page 159: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 143

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,058 113 41C 5/7/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 11 81,059 113 41C 5/21/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 11 81,060 113 41C 9/25/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 1 11 81,061 113 41C 10/27/1987 6/2/2005 17.6 1 11 81,062 113 41C 9/24/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 1 11 81,063 113 41C 7/31/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 1 11 81,064 113 41C 7/31/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 1 11 81,283 54 30J 8/13/1993 11/8/2010 17.2 1 11 81,284 54 30J 3/28/1994 11/8/2010 16.6 1 11 81,408 118 41J 9/27/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 81,409 118 41J 8/20/1988 8/31/2004 16.0 0 11 81,410 118 41J 3/31/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 81,411 118 41J 8/16/1988 8/31/2004 16.0 0 11 81,412 118 41J 10/12/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 81,413 118 41J 8/22/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 1 11 81,414 118 41J 6/25/1987 8/31/2004 17.2 1 11 81,415 118 41J 5/14/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 1 11 81,416 119 41J 10/29/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 81,417 119 41J 1/23/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 81,418 119 41J 4/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 1 11 81,419 119 41J 1/20/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 81,420 119 41J 5/5/1989 8/31/2004 15.3 1 11 81,421 119 41J 5/29/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 1 11 81,541 2 30G 5/17/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 1 11 81,542 2 30G 3/12/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 1 11 81,543 2 30G 5/4/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 1 11 86,639 48 32J 12/21/1992 5/3/2010 17.4 0 11 86,640 48 32J 7/17/1993 5/3/2010 16.8 0 11 86,641 48 32J 9/14/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 1 11 86,642 48 32J 9/30/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 1 11 86,643 48 32J 5/6/1993 5/3/2010 17.0 1 11 81,592 14 32H 8/15/1992 4/30/2010 17.7 0 11 81,593 14 32H 2/3/1993 4/30/2010 17.2 0 11 81,594 14 32H 7/28/1992 4/30/2010 17.8 0 11 81,595 14 32H 10/2/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 1 11 82,697 106 41A 3/14/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 82,698 110 41A 11/27/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 0 11 82,699 110 41A 1/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 82,700 110 41A 8/15/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 0 11 82,701 110 41A 8/26/1988 9/29/2004 16.1 0 11 82,702 110 41A 8/26/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 0 11 82,703 110 41A 4/18/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 0 11 82,704 110 41A 9/24/1988 6/2/2005 16.7 0 11 82,705 110 41A 6/6/1987 6/2/2005 18.0 0 11 82,706 110 41A 9/28/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 82,707 110 41A 9/28/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 0 11 82,708 110 41A 2/2/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 11 82,709 110 41A 8/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 11 82,710 110 41A 7/15/1988 9/29/2004 16.2 0 11 82,711 110 41A 2/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 8

Page 160: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 144

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,712 110 41A 7/30/1988 9/29/2004 16.2 0 11 82,713 110 41A 9/26/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 0 11 82,714 110 41A 9/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 82,715 110 41A 9/4/1988 9/29/2004 16.1 0 11 82,716 110 41A 12/8/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 82,717 110 41A 3/23/1988 9/29/2004 16.5 0 11 82,718 110 41A 7/16/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 82,719 110 41A 6/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 82,720 110 41A 8/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 11 82,721 110 41A 4/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 82,722 110 41A 5/28/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 82,723 110 41A 11/12/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 82,724 110 41A 11/20/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 82,725 110 41A 11/20/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 1 11 82,726 110 41A 6/10/1987 9/29/2004 17.3 1 11 82,727 110 41A 11/12/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 82,728 110 41A 3/31/1988 9/29/2004 16.5 1 11 82,729 110 41A 3/31/1988 6/2/2005 17.2 1 11 82,730 110 41A 1/17/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 1 11 82,731 110 41A 1/20/1988 9/29/2004 16.7 1 11 82,732 110 41A 11/18/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 82,733 110 41A 3/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 82,734 110 41A 6/1/1988 9/29/2004 16.3 1 11 82,735 110 41A 4/18/1988 9/29/2004 16.4 1 11 82,736 110 41A 9/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 82,737 110 41A 3/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 82,738 110 41A 11/28/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 82,739 110 41A 8/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 11 82,740 111 41A 7/12/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 82,741 111 41A 1/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 82,742 111 41A 7/3/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 82,743 111 41A 9/24/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 82,744 111 41A 12/12/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 82,745 111 41A 12/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 82,746 112 41A 1/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 82,747 112 41A 10/8/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 82,748 112 41A 5/31/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 82,749 112 41A 4/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 82,750 112 41A 1/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 82,751 112 41A 4/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 82,752 112 41A 12/11/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 83,105 120 41K 12/14/1987 8/30/2004 16.7 0 11 83,106 120 41K 5/8/1988 8/30/2004 16.3 1 11 83,107 120 41K 2/19/1988 8/30/2004 16.5 1 11 83,182 28 30C 3/24/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 1 11 83,183 28 30C 1/21/1993 4/30/2010 17.3 1 11 83,184 28 30C 7/24/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 1 11 83,368 122 41G 5/6/1988 6/10/2005 17.1 0 11 83,369 122 41G 11/11/1988 9/6/2005 16.8 0 11 83,370 122 41G 2/19/1988 6/10/2005 17.3 0 11 8

Page 161: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 145

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,371 122 41G 10/23/1988 9/6/2005 16.9 0 11 83,372 122 41G 4/14/1988 9/6/2004 16.4 1 11 83,373 122 41G 7/5/1988 9/6/2005 17.2 1 11 83,374 122 41G 1/13/1989 9/6/2005 16.6 1 11 83,375 122 41G 12/27/1988 9/6/2005 16.7 1 11 83,376 122 41G 2/3/1988 9/6/2005 17.6 1 11 83,377 122 41G 5/18/1988 6/10/2005 17.1 1 11 83,378 122 41G 3/27/1987 6/10/2005 18.2 1 11 83,427 125 41I 2/21/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 0 11 83,428 125 41I 1/21/1988 6/1/2005 17.4 0 11 83,429 125 41I 1/30/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 0 11 83,430 125 41I 5/6/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 0 11 83,431 125 41I 12/1/1987 6/1/2005 17.5 1 11 83,432 125 41I 6/17/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 1 11 83,433 125 41I 3/19/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 1 11 83,434 125 41I 4/7/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 83,435 125 41I 7/30/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 1 11 83,436 125 41I 9/2/1987 6/1/2005 17.7 1 11 84,085 116 41F 8/14/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 0 11 84,086 116 41F 7/25/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 0 11 84,087 116 41F 12/5/1988 9/25/2005 16.8 1 11 84,088 116 41F 8/25/1988 6/1/2005 16.8 1 11 84,089 116 41F 8/23/1988 6/1/2005 16.8 1 11 84,090 116 41F 10/26/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 1 11 84,091 124 41F 1/3/1989 9/2/2005 16.7 0 11 84,092 124 41F 11/29/1988 9/2/2005 16.8 0 11 84,265 36 30H 10/9/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 0 11 85,167 39 30I 9/24/1993 8/6/2010 16.9 1 11 85,214 19 32M 2/19/1993 3/26/2010 17.1 0 11 85,423 3 32A 6/10/1992 3/12/2010 17.8 1 11 85,424 3 32A 10/17/1992 3/12/2010 17.4 1 11 85,488 123 41H 6/19/1988 9/9/2004 16.2 0 11 85,489 123 41H 5/7/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 0 11 85,490 123 41H 3/12/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 0 11 85,491 123 41H 2/20/1988 9/9/2004 16.6 0 11 85,492 123 41H 11/19/1987 6/1/2005 17.5 0 11 85,493 123 41H 10/15/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 0 11 85,494 123 41H 3/28/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 1 11 85,495 123 41H 2/8/1988 9/9/2004 16.6 1 11 85,496 123 41H 8/22/1987 9/9/2004 17.1 1 11 85,497 123 41H 8/22/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 1 11 85,498 123 41H 8/26/1988 9/9/2004 16.0 1 11 85,499 123 41H 5/12/1988 9/9/2004 16.3 1 11 85,500 123 41H 9/24/1987 6/1/2005 17.7 1 11 85,609 115 41E 7/9/1988 6/3/2005 16.9 0 11 85,610 115 41E 2/29/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 0 11 85,611 115 41E 1/7/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 85,612 115 41E 2/19/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 0 11 85,613 115 41E 1/25/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 85,614 115 41E 11/27/1988 6/3/2005 16.5 0 11 8

Page 162: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 146

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,615 115 41E 2/9/1988 6/3/2005 17.3 1 11 85,616 115 41E 12/7/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 85,617 115 41E 7/15/1987 6/3/2005 17.9 1 11 86,318 50 32K 3/10/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 0 11 86,319 50 32K 9/9/1992 5/5/2010 17.7 0 11 86,320 52 32K 11/30/1992 4/29/2010 17.4 1 11 849 15 32L 10/4/1992 5/7/2010 17.6 0 11 9336 8 30A 7/7/1993 3/19/2010 16.7 0 11 9337 8 30A 2/22/1993 3/19/2010 17.1 1 11 9338 8 30A 2/19/1993 3/19/2010 17.1 1 11 9580 114 41D 12/26/1988 5/25/2006 17.4 0 11 9581 114 41D 9/28/1988 5/25/2006 17.7 1 11 9582 114 41D 4/17/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 1 11 9583 114 41D 2/11/1988 5/23/2005 17.3 1 11 9584 114 41D 2/11/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 9585 114 41D 6/22/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 1 11 9586 121 41D 10/14/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 0 11 9587 121 41D 6/27/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 0 11 9588 121 41D 7/26/1989 5/25/2006 16.8 0 11 9589 121 41D 7/26/1989 9/2/2005 16.1 0 11 9590 121 41D 7/8/1988 5/25/2006 17.9 1 11 9591 121 41D 8/21/1988 5/25/2006 17.8 1 11 9592 121 41D 1/27/1988 5/25/2006 18.3 1 11 9593 121 41D 2/20/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 9594 121 41D 9/13/1988 5/25/2006 17.7 1 11 9874 101 41B 1/14/1989 9/19/2005 16.7 1 11 9875 101 41B 6/1/1989 5/29/2006 17.0 1 11 91,065 113 41C 8/24/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 0 11 91,066 113 41C 3/21/1988 6/2/2005 17.2 0 11 91,067 113 41C 12/22/1987 6/2/2005 17.4 0 11 91,068 113 41C 11/5/1987 6/2/2005 17.6 0 11 91,069 113 41C 7/4/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 1 11 91,070 113 41C 12/19/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 1 11 91,071 113 41C 9/24/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 1 11 91,072 113 41C 6/30/1988 6/2/2005 16.9 1 11 91,422 118 41J 4/23/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 0 11 91,423 118 41J 7/4/1988 8/31/2004 16.2 0 11 91,424 118 41J 1/26/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 0 11 91,425 118 41J 12/28/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 91,426 118 41J 3/20/1988 8/31/2004 16.4 1 11 91,427 118 41J 9/29/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 91,428 118 41J 11/6/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 1 11 91,429 118 41J 2/9/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 91,430 119 41J 11/2/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 91,431 119 41J 5/19/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 1 11 91,432 119 41J 2/12/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 91,544 2 30G 10/1/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 0 11 91,545 2 30G 1/28/1993 5/13/2010 17.3 0 11 91,546 2 30G 7/27/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 0 11 91,547 2 30G 9/11/1992 5/13/2010 17.7 1 11 9

Page 163: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 147

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,548 2 30G 3/1/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 1 11 91,549 2 30G 11/2/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 1 11 96,369 41 32J 7/20/1993 4/20/2010 16.8 1 11 96,560 47 32J 8/3/1992 4/23/2010 17.7 1 11 96,644 48 32J 3/14/1993 5/3/2010 17.1 0 11 96,645 48 32J 5/6/1993 5/3/2010 17.0 1 11 96,646 48 32J 2/21/1993 5/3/2010 17.2 1 11 96,647 48 32J 11/8/1992 5/3/2010 17.5 1 11 96,726 41 32J 2/21/1998 9/15/2010 12.6 1 11 91,596 14 32H 3/23/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 0 11 91,597 14 32H 2/2/1993 4/30/2010 17.2 0 11 91,598 14 32H 5/19/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 1 11 91,599 14 32H 6/6/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 1 11 91,600 14 32H 12/27/1992 4/30/2010 17.3 1 11 92,753 103 41A 10/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 92,754 106 41A 1/26/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 92,755 106 41A 2/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 1 11 92,756 110 41A 7/16/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 92,757 110 41A 6/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 92,758 110 41A 2/8/1988 9/29/2004 16.6 0 11 92,759 110 41A 11/27/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 92,760 110 41A 12/30/1987 9/29/2004 16.8 0 11 92,761 110 41A 9/15/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 92,762 110 41A 8/5/1988 9/29/2004 16.2 0 11 92,763 110 41A 6/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 0 11 92,764 110 41A 5/18/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 0 11 92,765 110 41A 4/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 92,766 110 41A 7/30/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 0 11 92,767 110 41A 9/26/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 92,768 110 41A 7/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 92,769 110 41A 3/23/1988 6/2/2005 17.2 0 11 92,770 110 41A 7/17/1988 9/29/2004 16.2 0 11 92,771 110 41A 2/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 92,772 110 41A 6/7/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 92,773 110 41A 8/20/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 92,774 110 41A 11/12/1987 6/2/2005 17.6 1 11 92,775 110 41A 4/8/1988 9/29/2004 16.5 1 11 92,776 110 41A 4/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 1 11 92,777 110 41A 1/27/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 92,778 110 41A 11/23/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 1 11 92,779 110 41A 6/2/1988 9/29/2004 16.3 1 11 92,780 110 41A 11/16/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 1 11 92,781 110 41A 2/15/1988 9/29/2004 16.6 1 11 92,782 110 41A 6/1/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 1 11 92,783 110 41A 6/19/1988 9/29/2004 16.3 1 11 92,784 110 41A 5/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 92,785 110 41A 2/12/1988 9/29/2004 16.6 1 11 92,786 110 41A 10/14/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 92,787 110 41A 9/20/2006 1 11 92,788 110 41A 9/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 9

Page 164: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 148

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,789 111 41A 7/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 11 92,790 111 41A 9/8/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 92,791 111 41A 10/19/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 92,792 111 41A 3/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 92,793 111 41A 5/8/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 1 11 92,794 111 41A 8/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 11 92,795 112 41A 10/8/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 92,796 112 41A 4/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 0 11 92,797 112 41A 1/16/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 93,185 28 30C 12/22/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 0 11 93,186 28 30C 5/7/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 1 11 93,187 28 30C 9/15/1992 4/30/2010 17.6 1 11 93,379 122 41G 3/5/1988 9/6/2004 16.5 0 11 93,380 122 41G 9/4/1987 6/10/2005 17.8 1 11 93,381 122 41G 4/14/1988 6/10/2005 17.2 1 11 93,382 122 41G 12/21/1988 9/6/2005 16.7 1 11 93,383 122 41G 3/27/1987 9/6/2004 17.4 1 11 93,437 125 41I 11/27/1987 6/1/2005 17.5 0 11 93,438 125 41I 6/10/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 93,439 125 41I 6/6/1989 9/11/2005 16.3 0 11 93,440 125 41I 5/26/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 1 11 93,441 125 41I 11/9/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 1 11 93,442 125 41I 2/23/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 1 11 94,093 116 41F 7/11/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 0 11 94,094 116 41F 8/16/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 1 11 94,095 116 41F 6/2/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 1 11 94,096 116 41F 7/30/1988 6/1/2005 16.8 1 11 94,097 116 41F 1/4/1989 9/25/2005 16.7 1 11 94,098 124 41F 11/29/1988 2/20/2006 17.2 0 11 94,099 124 41F 11/29/1988 2/20/2006 17.2 0 11 94,266 36 30H 8/16/1993 5/13/2010 16.7 1 11 94,267 36 30H 7/23/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 1 11 94,268 36 30H 4/21/1993 5/13/2010 17.1 1 11 94,269 36 30H 7/6/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 1 11 94,517 20 32D 4/8/1993 3/22/2010 17.0 0 11 94,518 20 32D 1/19/1993 3/22/2010 17.2 1 11 94,519 38 32D 1/26/1993 3/22/2010 17.1 1 11 95,425 3 32A 5/22/1993 3/12/2010 16.8 1 11 95,501 123 41H 6/19/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 95,502 123 41H 10/5/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 0 11 95,503 123 41H 4/25/1988 9/9/2004 16.4 0 11 95,504 123 41H 7/10/1988 9/9/2004 16.2 0 11 95,505 123 41H 7/10/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 0 11 95,506 123 41H 6/30/1988 9/9/2004 16.2 0 11 95,507 123 41H 8/23/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 0 11 95,508 123 41H 3/3/1988 9/13/2004 16.5 0 11 95,509 123 41H 10/15/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 0 11 95,510 123 41H 8/25/1988 9/9/2004 16.0 0 11 95,511 123 41H 8/3/1987 9/9/2004 17.1 1 11 95,512 123 41H 4/20/1987 9/9/2004 17.4 1 11 9

Page 165: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 149

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,513 123 41H 3/19/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 1 11 95,514 123 41H 5/12/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 95,515 123 41H 8/3/1988 9/9/2004 16.1 1 11 95,516 123 41H 6/17/1987 9/9/2004 17.2 1 11 95,517 123 41H 6/17/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 1 11 95,518 123 41H 1/14/1988 9/9/2004 16.7 1 11 95,618 115 41E 10/1/1987 6/3/2005 17.7 0 11 95,619 115 41E 6/29/1988 6/3/2005 16.9 0 11 95,620 115 41E 8/6/1987 6/3/2005 17.8 1 11 95,621 115 41E 8/6/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 1 11 95,622 115 41E 1/10/1988 8/31/2004 16.6 1 11 95,623 115 41E 3/22/1988 6/3/2005 17.2 1 11 95,624 115 41E 1/4/1988 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 95,625 115 41E 7/15/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 1 11 96,321 50 32K 2/15/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 0 11 96,322 50 32K 1/31/1993 5/5/2010 17.3 0 11 96,323 50 32K 6/10/1993 5/5/2010 16.9 0 11 96,324 50 32K 3/5/1993 5/5/2010 17.2 1 11 96,325 51 32K 6/27/1993 4/29/2010 16.8 0 11 950 15 32L 5/14/1993 5/7/2010 17.0 1 11 1051 49 32L 10/8/1992 5/7/2010 17.6 0 11 1052 49 32L 12/1/1992 5/7/2010 17.4 0 11 10339 8 30A 2/16/1993 3/19/2010 17.1 0 11 10340 8 30A 11/13/1992 3/19/2010 17.3 1 11 10341 8 30A 6/9/1993 3/19/2010 16.8 1 11 10342 8 30A 2/13/1992 3/19/2010 18.1 1 11 10595 114 41D 4/8/1988 5/23/2005 17.1 0 11 10596 114 41D 12/1/1987 5/23/2005 17.5 0 11 10597 114 41D 12/1/1987 8/31/2004 16.8 0 11 10598 121 41D 10/3/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 1 11 10599 121 41D 3/8/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 10600 121 41D 1/13/1989 5/25/2006 17.4 1 11 10601 121 41D 2/14/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 10602 121 41D 10/30/1988 9/2/2005 16.8 1 11 10603 121 41D 10/30/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 1 11 10604 121 41D 2/20/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 1 11 10605 126 41D 5/6/1989 9/2/2005 16.3 0 11 10876 101 41B 3/27/1989 5/29/2006 17.2 1 11 101,073 113 41C 9/23/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 0 11 101,074 113 41C 10/7/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 101,075 113 41C 2/7/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 11 101,076 113 41C 9/24/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 1 11 101,077 113 41C 2/29/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 1 11 101,078 113 41C 7/9/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 1 11 101,433 118 41J 12/29/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 101,434 118 41J 7/18/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 1 11 101,435 118 41J 8/8/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 1 11 101,436 119 41J 5/11/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 1 11 101,437 119 41J 10/2/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 101,438 119 41J 7/20/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 1 11 10

Page 166: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 150

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,439 119 41J 12/7/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 101,440 119 41J 10/13/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 101,550 2 30G 6/13/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 1 11 106,370 41 32J 8/24/1992 4/20/2010 17.7 0 11 106,371 41 32J 8/31/1992 4/20/2010 17.6 1 11 106,561 47 32J 6/18/1993 4/23/2010 16.8 0 11 106,648 48 32J 11/17/1992 5/3/2010 17.5 0 11 106,649 48 32J 9/16/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 0 11 106,650 48 32J 11/17/1992 5/3/2010 17.5 0 11 106,651 48 32J 11/25/1992 5/3/2010 17.4 1 11 106,652 48 32J 9/14/1992 5/3/2010 17.6 1 11 106,653 48 32J 10/16/1992 5/3/2010 17.5 1 11 102,798 105 41A 7/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 102,799 110 41A 9/16/1987 9/29/2004 17.0 0 11 102,800 110 41A 3/11/1988 6/2/2005 17.2 0 11 102,801 110 41A 2/21/1990 9/20/2006 16.6 0 11 102,802 110 41A 9/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 11 102,803 110 41A 9/15/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 102,804 110 41A 11/28/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 102,805 110 41A 10/29/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 102,806 110 41A 3/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 102,807 110 41A 2/15/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 102,808 110 41A 12/8/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 102,809 110 41A 12/22/1987 6/2/2005 17.4 1 11 102,810 110 41A 7/3/1987 9/29/2004 17.2 1 11 102,811 110 41A 2/12/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 102,812 110 41A 9/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 11 102,813 110 41A 1/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 102,814 110 41A 11/18/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 102,815 110 41A 5/30/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 102,816 110 41A 9/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 11 102,817 110 41A 11/15/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 102,818 111 41A 8/15/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 1 11 102,819 112 41A 1/16/1990 9/20/2006 16.7 0 11 102,820 112 41A 5/6/1990 9/20/2006 16.4 0 11 103,188 28 30C 3/24/1993 4/30/2010 17.1 1 11 103,443 125 41I 1/26/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 0 11 103,444 125 41I 4/25/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 0 11 103,445 125 41I 11/12/1988 6/1/2005 16.6 0 11 103,446 125 41I 1/25/1989 9/11/2005 16.6 0 11 103,447 125 41I 7/6/1987 6/1/2005 17.9 1 11 103,448 125 41I 5/4/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 104,100 116 41F 5/26/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 104,101 116 41F 9/19/1988 2/20/2006 17.4 0 11 104,102 116 41F 1/12/1988 6/1/2005 17.4 0 11 104,103 116 41F 8/5/1988 6/1/2005 16.8 0 11 104,104 116 41F 10/26/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 0 11 104,105 116 41F 12/5/1988 2/20/2006 17.2 1 11 104,106 116 41F 7/31/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 1 11 104,107 116 41F 11/20/1987 6/1/2005 17.5 1 11 10

Page 167: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 151

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

4,108 116 41F 8/14/1987 6/1/2005 17.8 1 11 104,109 116 41F 3/14/1988 6/1/2005 17.2 1 11 104,110 116 41F 9/22/1987 6/1/2005 17.7 1 11 104,111 124 41F 1/3/1989 2/20/2006 17.1 0 11 104,112 124 41F 2/9/1989 2/20/2006 17.0 0 11 104,113 124 41F 10/14/1988 9/2/2005 16.9 0 11 104,270 36 30H 3/19/1994 11/11/2010 16.6 1 11 104,271 36 30H 7/6/1993 5/13/2010 16.9 1 11 104,520 20 32D 3/24/1993 3/22/2010 17.0 1 11 104,521 38 32D 4/9/1993 3/22/2010 17.0 0 11 104,522 38 32D 2/28/1993 3/22/2010 17.1 1 11 105,426 3 32A 5/20/1993 3/12/2010 16.8 0 11 105,427 3 32A 5/2/1993 3/12/2010 16.9 0 11 105,519 123 41H 4/25/1988 9/13/2004 16.4 0 11 105,520 123 41H 10/28/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 0 11 105,521 123 41H 10/28/1987 9/13/2004 16.9 0 11 105,522 123 41H 1/6/1988 9/9/2004 16.7 0 11 105,523 123 41H 5/19/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 1 11 105,524 123 41H 11/29/1987 9/9/2004 16.8 1 11 105,525 123 41H 11/29/1987 9/13/2004 16.8 1 11 105,526 123 41H 11/9/1987 9/9/2004 16.8 1 11 105,527 123 41H 4/6/1988 9/9/2004 16.4 1 11 105,626 115 41E 7/5/1988 6/3/2005 16.9 0 11 105,627 115 41E 2/29/1988 6/3/2005 17.3 0 11 105,628 115 41E 1/25/1988 6/3/2005 17.4 0 11 105,629 115 41E 3/10/1988 6/3/2005 17.2 0 11 105,630 115 41E 3/10/1988 8/31/2004 16.5 0 11 105,631 115 41E 1/10/1988 6/3/2005 17.4 1 11 105,632 115 41E 12/7/1987 6/3/2005 17.5 1 11 105,633 115 41E 1/4/1988 6/3/2005 17.4 1 11 106,326 50 32K 3/16/1993 5/5/2010 17.1 1 11 106,327 50 32K 9/18/1992 5/5/2010 17.6 1 11 106,328 51 32K 7/31/1993 4/29/2010 16.7 1 11 1053 15 32L 3/16/1993 5/7/2010 17.1 0 11 11343 8 30A 11/29/1992 3/19/2010 17.3 0 11 11344 8 30A 6/4/1993 3/19/2010 16.8 0 11 11345 8 30A 4/29/1993 3/19/2010 16.9 0 11 11606 114 41D 2/25/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 1 11 11607 114 41D 7/11/1988 5/25/2006 17.9 1 11 11608 114 41D 4/13/1988 5/23/2005 17.1 1 11 11609 114 41D 6/22/1988 5/25/2006 17.9 1 11 11610 121 41D 6/22/1989 5/25/2006 16.9 0 11 11611 121 41D 6/27/1989 5/25/2006 16.9 0 11 11612 121 41D 3/8/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 1 11 11613 121 41D 1/13/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 1 11 11614 121 41D 11/7/1988 5/25/2006 17.5 1 11 11615 121 41D 3/4/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 1 11 11616 121 41D 12/17/1989 9/2/2005 15.7 1 11 111,079 113 41C 12/22/1987 9/2/2005 17.7 0 11 111,080 113 41C 9/5/1988 6/2/2005 16.7 0 11 11

Page 168: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 152

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,081 113 41C 2/7/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 11 111,082 113 41C 4/21/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 1 11 111,083 113 41C 2/24/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 111,441 118 41J 1/5/1988 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 111,442 118 41J 9/21/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 11 111,443 118 41J 8/21/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 1 11 111,444 118 41J 9/30/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 1 11 111,551 2 30G 12/7/1992 5/13/2010 17.4 0 11 111,552 2 30G 5/7/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 0 11 111,553 2 30G 7/7/1993 5/13/2010 16.8 1 11 111,554 2 30G 11/25/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 1 11 116,372 41 32J 11/23/1992 4/20/2010 17.4 0 11 116,373 41 32J 8/11/1993 4/20/2010 16.7 1 11 116,562 47 32J 5/7/1993 4/23/2010 17.0 1 11 116,654 48 32J 6/22/1992 5/3/2010 17.9 0 11 112,821 106 41A 11/9/1990 9/20/2006 15.9 1 11 112,822 110 41A 9/16/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 0 11 112,823 110 41A 11/30/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 112,824 110 41A 11/25/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 0 11 112,825 110 41A 8/5/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 0 11 112,826 110 41A 7/17/1988 6/2/2005 16.9 0 11 112,827 110 41A 9/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 11 112,828 110 41A 7/19/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 0 11 112,829 110 41A 9/10/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 11 112,830 110 41A 3/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 112,831 110 41A 11/23/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 112,832 110 41A 3/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 112,833 110 41A 11/16/1987 6/2/2005 17.5 1 11 112,834 110 41A 7/3/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 1 11 112,835 110 41A 3/11/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 112,836 110 41A 12/8/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 1 11 112,837 110 41A 7/26/1990 9/20/2006 16.2 1 11 112,838 110 41A 10/14/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 112,839 111 41A 11/10/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 113,108 120 41K 2/22/1988 8/30/2004 16.5 0 11 113,189 28 30C 11/22/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 0 11 113,190 28 30C 2/9/1993 4/30/2010 17.2 1 11 113,384 122 41G 7/10/1988 6/10/2005 16.9 1 11 113,449 125 41I 7/8/1988 6/1/2005 16.9 0 11 113,450 125 41I 11/12/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 0 11 113,451 125 41I 6/20/1987 6/1/2005 17.9 1 11 113,452 125 41I 12/25/1987 6/1/2005 17.4 1 11 114,114 116 41F 6/15/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 0 11 114,115 116 41F 4/1/1989 9/25/2005 16.5 0 11 114,116 116 41F 2/23/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 0 11 114,117 124 41F 10/14/1988 2/20/2006 17.4 0 11 114,272 36 30H 3/29/1994 11/11/2010 16.6 1 11 114,523 20 32D 2/14/1993 3/22/2010 17.1 0 11 115,215 19 32M 12/22/1992 3/26/2010 17.3 0 11 115,428 3 32A 2/2/1993 3/12/2010 17.1 0 11 11

Page 169: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 153

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

5,528 123 41H 10/1/1987 9/9/2004 16.9 0 11 115,529 123 41H 10/1/1987 9/13/2004 17.0 0 11 115,530 123 41H 6/12/1988 9/9/2004 16.2 0 11 1154 49 32L 5/9/1993 5/7/2010 17.0 0 11 12346 8 30A 3/28/1993 3/19/2010 17.0 0 11 12347 8 30A 10/1/1992 3/19/2010 17.5 1 11 12617 114 41D 12/17/1989 5/25/2006 16.4 1 11 12618 114 41D 2/25/1989 9/2/2005 16.5 1 11 12619 114 41D 8/18/1988 5/25/2006 17.8 1 11 12620 121 41D 8/12/1988 5/25/2006 17.8 1 11 12621 121 41D 2/1/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 1 11 12622 121 41D 10/3/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 1 11 12623 121 41D 2/14/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 1 11 12624 126 41D 6/27/1989 9/2/2005 16.2 0 11 121,084 113 41C 11/5/1987 9/2/2005 17.8 0 11 121,085 113 41C 9/5/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 0 11 121,086 113 41C 5/7/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 0 11 121,087 113 41C 9/24/1987 6/2/2005 17.7 1 11 121,088 113 41C 2/29/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 1 11 121,089 113 41C 2/24/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 1 11 121,090 113 41C 8/16/1987 6/2/2005 17.8 1 11 121,091 113 41C 8/16/1987 9/2/2005 18.0 1 11 121,092 113 41C 4/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.1 1 11 121,093 113 41C 4/8/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 1 11 121,445 118 41J 1/3/1988 8/31/2004 16.7 0 11 121,446 119 41J 12/11/1987 8/31/2004 16.7 1 11 121,447 119 41J 7/16/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 1 11 121,555 2 30G 2/3/1993 5/13/2010 17.3 1 11 126,374 41 32J 7/24/1993 4/20/2010 16.7 1 11 126,563 47 32J 2/25/1993 4/23/2010 17.2 0 11 126,655 48 32J 2/22/1993 5/3/2010 17.2 1 11 126,656 48 32J 1/28/1993 5/3/2010 17.3 1 11 126,657 48 32J 5/24/1993 5/3/2010 16.9 1 11 126,665 41 32J 10/26/1997 9/14/2010 12.9 1 11 122,840 106 41A 3/5/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 122,841 106 41A 12/29/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 122,842 106 41A 12/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.7 1 11 122,843 106 41A 10/9/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 11 122,844 110 41A 6/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 122,845 110 41A 9/23/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 0 11 122,846 110 41A 3/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 11 122,847 110 41A 11/16/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 122,848 110 41A 11/16/1987 9/29/2004 16.9 1 11 122,849 110 41A 6/19/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 1 11 122,850 110 41A 3/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 122,851 110 41A 3/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 122,852 110 41A 5/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 122,853 110 41A 3/27/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 122,854 110 41A 9/9/1990 9/20/2006 16.0 1 11 122,855 110 41A 3/4/1990 9/20/2006 16.5 1 11 12

Page 170: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 154

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,856 112 41A 5/31/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 11 123,191 28 30C 5/18/1993 4/30/2010 17.0 1 11 123,385 122 41G 9/18/1987 6/10/2005 17.7 1 11 123,453 125 41I 4/20/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 0 11 123,454 125 41I 5/18/1988 6/1/2005 17.0 1 11 123,455 125 41I 6/14/1989 9/11/2005 16.2 1 11 123,456 125 41I 2/5/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 1 11 124,524 38 32D 7/13/1992 3/22/2010 17.7 1 11 125,531 123 41H 8/3/1988 6/1/2005 16.8 0 11 125,532 123 41H 5/15/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 0 11 125,533 123 41H 3/30/1988 9/9/2004 16.4 0 11 125,534 123 41H 2/8/1988 6/1/2005 17.3 1 11 125,535 123 41H 4/20/1987 6/1/2005 18.1 1 11 125,536 123 41H 5/7/1988 9/9/2004 16.3 1 11 125,537 123 41H 5/7/1988 6/1/2005 17.1 1 11 125,538 123 41H 11/9/1987 6/1/2005 17.6 1 11 12625 121 41D 2/1/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 1 11 13626 121 41D 8/11/1988 5/25/2006 17.8 1 11 13627 121 41D 8/11/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 1 11 131,556 2 30G 5/13/1993 5/13/2010 17.0 0 11 136,375 41 32J 3/1/1993 4/20/2010 17.1 1 11 131,601 14 32H 12/13/1992 4/30/2010 17.4 1 11 132,857 110 41A 5/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 1 11 133,457 125 41I 6/14/1989 6/2/2006 17.0 1 11 134,118 116 41F 4/1/1989 2/20/2006 16.9 0 11 135,539 123 41H 4/11/1988 9/9/2004 16.4 0 11 135,540 123 41H 4/11/1988 9/13/2004 16.4 0 11 135,541 123 41H 12/26/1987 9/9/2004 16.7 1 11 13877 101 41B 8/26/1985 9/13/2004 19.0 0 12 01,448 118 41J 6/2/1986 8/31/2004 18.2 1 12 02,858 106 41A 3/22/1988 9/20/2006 18.5 1 12 02,859 112 41A 10/7/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 05,168 39 30I 9/28/1992 8/6/2010 17.9 0 12 05,169 39 30I 4/8/1993 8/6/2010 17.3 0 12 05,170 39 30I 6/22/1993 8/6/2010 17.1 1 12 05,171 39 30I 6/28/1993 8/6/2010 17.1 1 12 0628 114 41D 4/9/1987 8/31/2004 17.4 0 12 1629 121 41D 6/6/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 0 12 1878 101 41B 11/23/1985 9/13/2004 18.8 0 12 1879 101 41B 2/9/1988 5/29/2006 18.3 0 12 1880 101 41B 7/9/1987 9/13/2004 17.2 0 12 1881 101 41B 7/26/1987 5/27/2005 17.8 0 12 1882 101 41B 7/26/1986 9/13/2004 18.1 0 12 1883 101 41B 6/6/1986 9/13/2004 18.3 0 12 1884 101 41B 10/14/1987 5/29/2006 18.6 0 12 1885 101 41B 10/3/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 1 12 1886 101 41B 7/28/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 1887 101 41B 11/19/1988 5/29/2006 17.5 1 12 12,860 105 41A 5/29/1990 9/20/2006 16.3 0 12 12,861 105 41A 10/24/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 0 12 1

Page 171: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 155

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,862 106 41A 2/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 12,863 106 41A 7/7/1987 9/20/2006 19.2 0 12 12,864 106 41A 6/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 12,865 106 41A 8/18/1988 9/20/2006 18.1 1 12 12,866 110 41A 9/28/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 12,867 110 41A 4/11/1987 9/29/2004 17.5 1 12 12,868 112 41A 3/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 13,192 28 30C 3/24/1992 4/30/2010 18.1 1 12 13,193 28 30C 11/4/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 1 12 14,273 36 30H 7/29/1992 11/11/2010 18.3 0 12 14,274 36 30H 6/1/1993 11/11/2010 17.4 0 12 15,172 39 30I 11/15/1992 8/6/2010 17.7 0 12 15,173 39 30I 3/30/1993 8/6/2010 17.4 0 12 15,174 39 30I 6/1/1992 8/6/2010 18.2 0 12 15,175 39 30I 9/17/1993 8/6/2010 16.9 0 12 15,176 39 30I 4/29/1992 8/6/2010 18.3 1 12 15,177 39 30I 10/1/1992 8/6/2010 17.8 1 12 15,178 39 30I 10/12/1992 8/6/2010 17.8 1 12 15,179 39 30I 2/15/1992 8/6/2010 18.5 1 12 1299 30 30B 3/12/1992 9/3/2010 18.5 0 12 2630 114 41D 5/25/1987 5/23/2005 18.0 0 12 2631 121 41D 6/14/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 0 12 2888 101 41B 4/27/1988 9/19/2005 17.4 0 12 2889 101 41B 4/27/1988 5/29/2006 18.1 0 12 2890 101 41B 5/28/1988 9/20/2006 18.3 0 12 2891 101 41B 5/2/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 2892 101 41B 1/16/1988 5/29/2006 18.4 0 12 2893 101 41B 5/16/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 12 2894 101 41B 1/23/1988 9/19/2005 17.7 0 12 2895 101 41B 10/29/1986 9/13/2004 17.9 0 12 2896 101 41B 10/12/1986 5/27/2005 18.6 0 12 2897 101 41B 12/21/1985 9/13/2004 18.7 1 12 2898 101 41B 9/28/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 12 2899 101 41B 4/27/1988 9/20/2006 18.4 1 12 2900 101 41B 8/4/1988 9/19/2005 17.1 1 12 2901 101 41B 12/4/1986 5/27/2005 18.5 1 12 2902 101 41B 12/4/1986 9/13/2004 17.8 1 12 2903 101 41B 6/23/1987 9/19/2005 18.2 1 12 2904 101 41B 2/16/1988 9/19/2005 17.6 1 12 26,658 48 32J 1/10/1991 5/3/2010 19.3 0 12 26,659 48 32J 1/1/1991 5/3/2010 19.3 1 12 22,869 103 41A 3/2/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 22,870 106 41A 6/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 22,871 110 41A 6/27/1987 9/29/2004 17.3 0 12 22,872 110 41A 7/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 22,873 111 41A 7/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 12 22,874 111 41A 7/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 12 22,875 112 41A 8/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 22,876 112 41A 4/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 22,877 112 41A 10/21/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 0 12 2

Page 172: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 156

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,878 112 41A 5/1/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 22,879 112 41A 5/1/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 22,880 112 41A 4/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 22,881 112 41A 5/1/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 22,882 112 41A 3/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 23,109 120 41K 6/16/1986 8/30/2004 18.2 0 12 23,194 28 30C 5/27/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 0 12 23,195 28 30C 5/27/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 0 12 23,196 28 30C 6/19/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 0 12 23,197 28 30C 4/8/1992 4/30/2010 18.1 1 12 24,119 117 41F 4/21/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 0 12 24,275 36 30H 10/23/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 0 12 24,276 36 30H 10/27/1992 11/11/2010 18.0 1 12 25,180 39 30I 5/11/1992 8/6/2010 18.2 0 12 25,181 39 30I 3/25/1993 8/6/2010 17.4 0 12 25,182 39 30I 4/22/1993 8/6/2010 17.3 0 12 25,183 39 30I 7/21/1993 8/6/2010 17.0 0 12 25,184 39 30I 4/5/1993 8/6/2010 17.3 1 12 25,185 39 30I 11/11/1991 8/6/2010 18.7 1 12 25,186 39 30I 7/19/1993 8/6/2010 17.0 1 12 25,187 39 30I 5/13/1993 8/6/2010 17.2 1 12 25,188 39 30I 3/18/1992 8/6/2010 18.4 1 12 25,189 39 30I 4/5/1992 8/6/2010 18.3 1 12 25,542 123 41H 12/3/1986 9/13/2004 17.8 0 12 25,543 123 41H 8/16/1988 9/9/2004 16.1 0 12 26,329 51 32K 4/21/1992 4/29/2010 18.0 0 12 255 49 32L 5/5/1992 5/7/2010 18.0 1 12 356 49 32L 5/31/1991 5/7/2010 18.9 1 12 3300 30 30B 8/26/1992 9/3/2010 18.0 0 12 3301 30 30B 8/3/1993 9/3/2010 17.1 1 12 3632 114 41D 11/19/1987 5/25/2006 18.5 0 12 3633 114 41D 1/26/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 0 12 3634 114 41D 5/25/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 0 12 3635 121 41D 5/5/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 12 3636 126 41D 5/1/1988 9/2/2005 17.3 0 12 3905 101 41B 1/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.7 0 12 3906 101 41B 6/18/1988 9/19/2005 17.3 0 12 3907 101 41B 6/6/1986 5/27/2005 19.0 0 12 3908 101 41B 10/3/1986 5/27/2005 18.6 0 12 3909 101 41B 7/21/1987 9/19/2005 18.2 0 12 3910 101 41B 8/26/1985 5/27/2005 19.8 0 12 3911 101 41B 5/10/1988 9/19/2005 17.4 1 12 3912 101 41B 6/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 3913 101 41B 5/5/1986 9/13/2004 18.4 1 12 31,449 118 41J 11/13/1986 8/31/2004 17.8 0 12 31,450 119 41J 7/23/1988 8/31/2004 16.1 1 12 36,564 47 32J 9/9/1990 4/23/2010 19.6 1 12 32,883 103 41A 10/21/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 1 12 32,884 105 41A 10/18/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 1 12 32,885 106 41A 8/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 3

Page 173: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 157

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,886 106 41A 8/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 32,887 106 41A 4/5/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 32,888 106 41A 6/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 32,889 106 41A 4/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 32,890 106 41A 1/22/1989 9/20/2006 17.7 1 12 32,891 110 41A 8/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 32,892 110 41A 7/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 32,893 110 41A 7/5/1987 9/29/2004 17.2 1 12 32,894 110 41A 12/28/1988 9/20/2006 17.7 1 12 32,895 110 41A 12/23/1988 9/20/2006 17.7 1 12 32,896 112 41A 7/28/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 32,897 112 41A 6/7/1988 9/20/2006 18.3 0 12 32,898 112 41A 6/7/1988 6/2/2005 17.0 0 12 32,899 112 41A 12/8/1988 6/2/2005 16.5 0 12 32,900 112 41A 5/30/1989 6/2/2005 16.0 0 12 32,901 112 41A 1/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 32,902 112 41A 6/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 32,903 112 41A 3/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 32,904 112 41A 8/22/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 33,198 28 30C 4/18/1992 4/30/2010 18.0 0 12 33,199 28 30C 11/17/1991 4/30/2010 18.5 0 12 33,200 28 30C 3/3/1992 4/30/2010 18.2 0 12 33,201 28 30C 8/8/1992 4/30/2010 17.7 0 12 33,202 28 30C 7/20/1991 4/30/2010 18.8 1 12 33,386 122 41G 1/28/1987 6/10/2005 18.4 1 12 33,387 122 41G 8/4/1986 6/10/2005 18.9 1 12 33,458 125 41I 1/1/1988 9/11/2005 17.7 0 12 34,120 116 41F 2/25/1988 9/25/2005 17.6 1 12 34,121 124 41F 7/23/1987 9/2/2005 18.1 1 12 34,277 36 30H 10/23/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 0 12 34,278 36 30H 8/29/1993 11/11/2010 17.2 0 12 34,525 20 32D 8/4/1991 3/22/2010 18.6 1 12 34,526 38 32D 2/2/1992 3/22/2010 18.1 0 12 34,527 38 32D 5/9/1992 3/22/2010 17.9 0 12 34,528 38 32D 3/5/1992 3/22/2010 18.0 0 12 34,529 38 32D 2/2/1992 3/22/2010 18.1 0 12 34,530 38 32D 7/20/1992 3/22/2010 17.7 1 12 35,190 39 30I 8/1/1993 8/6/2010 17.0 0 12 35,191 39 30I 3/20/1993 8/6/2010 17.4 0 12 35,192 39 30I 7/5/1993 8/6/2010 17.1 0 12 35,193 39 30I 5/17/1993 8/6/2010 17.2 0 12 35,194 39 30I 10/15/1992 8/6/2010 17.8 1 12 35,195 39 30I 8/27/1993 8/6/2010 16.9 1 12 35,544 123 41H 12/3/1986 9/9/2004 17.8 0 12 36,330 50 32K 8/24/1991 5/5/2010 18.7 0 12 36,331 50 32K 5/20/1992 5/5/2010 18.0 0 12 36,332 50 32K 2/13/1991 5/5/2010 19.2 1 12 36,333 50 32K 6/3/1992 5/5/2010 17.9 1 12 36,334 50 32K 1/10/1991 5/5/2010 19.3 1 12 357 49 32L 10/29/1991 5/7/2010 18.5 0 12 4

Page 174: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 158

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

637 114 41D 4/9/1987 5/23/2005 18.1 0 12 4638 114 41D 7/18/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 0 12 4639 121 41D 2/16/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 0 12 4640 121 41D 4/5/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 0 12 4641 121 41D 5/5/1988 5/25/2006 18.1 0 12 4642 121 41D 12/27/1988 5/25/2006 17.4 0 12 4914 101 41B 9/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 12 4915 101 41B 1/23/1988 5/29/2006 18.3 0 12 4916 101 41B 10/14/1987 9/19/2005 17.9 0 12 4917 101 41B 10/4/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 4918 101 41B 10/3/1986 9/13/2004 17.9 0 12 4919 101 41B 5/15/1988 9/20/2006 18.3 1 12 4920 101 41B 6/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 4921 101 41B 3/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 4922 101 41B 1/30/1988 9/19/2005 17.6 1 12 41,094 113 41C 1/29/1987 9/2/2005 18.6 0 12 41,095 113 41C 3/13/1987 9/2/2005 18.5 0 12 41,285 55 30J 10/4/1992 11/8/2010 18.1 1 12 41,451 118 41J 5/30/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 0 12 46,376 41 32J 5/13/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 0 12 41,602 14 32H 5/20/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 0 12 42,905 100 41A 5/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 42,906 106 41A 9/2/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 12 42,907 106 41A 9/25/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 42,908 106 41A 5/15/1988 9/20/2006 18.3 1 12 42,909 106 41A 1/27/1988 9/20/2006 18.6 1 12 42,910 110 41A 5/8/1986 9/29/2004 18.4 0 12 42,911 110 41A 6/27/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 0 12 42,912 110 41A 12/9/1986 6/2/2005 18.5 0 12 42,913 110 41A 2/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 42,914 110 41A 10/2/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 42,915 110 41A 7/25/1989 6/2/2005 15.9 0 12 42,916 111 41A 8/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 42,917 111 41A 5/12/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 42,918 111 41A 2/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 42,919 112 41A 12/8/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 0 12 42,920 112 41A 5/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 12 42,921 112 41A 5/2/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 42,922 112 41A 3/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 42,923 112 41A 6/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 42,924 112 41A 3/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 42,925 112 41A 5/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 42,926 112 41A 8/22/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 43,110 120 41K 12/23/1986 8/30/2004 17.7 0 12 43,111 120 41K 4/3/1987 8/30/2004 17.4 0 12 43,203 28 30C 6/21/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 0 12 43,204 28 30C 7/24/1992 4/30/2010 17.8 0 12 43,205 28 30C 10/30/1991 4/30/2010 18.5 1 12 43,206 28 30C 5/25/1991 4/30/2010 18.9 1 12 43,207 28 30C 9/14/1991 4/30/2010 18.6 1 12 4

Page 175: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 159

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,208 28 30C 12/13/1991 4/30/2010 18.4 1 12 43,388 122 41G 1/31/1986 6/10/2005 19.4 0 12 43,389 122 41G 1/31/1986 9/6/2004 18.6 0 12 43,390 122 41G 1/28/1987 9/6/2004 17.6 1 12 43,459 125 41I 7/11/1988 9/11/2005 17.2 0 12 44,122 116 41F 5/4/1988 9/25/2005 17.4 1 12 44,123 117 41F 4/21/1988 2/20/2006 17.8 0 12 44,124 124 41F 3/13/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 0 12 44,279 36 30H 3/11/1993 11/11/2010 17.7 0 12 44,280 36 30H 10/13/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 0 12 44,281 36 30H 6/5/1992 5/11/2010 17.9 0 12 44,282 36 30H 7/12/1992 5/11/2010 17.8 0 12 44,283 36 30H 9/29/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 1 12 44,284 36 30H 1/15/1992 5/13/2010 18.3 1 12 44,531 38 32D 7/11/1991 3/22/2010 18.7 0 12 44,532 38 32D 7/9/1992 3/22/2010 17.7 0 12 44,533 38 32D 7/6/1992 3/22/2010 17.7 0 12 44,534 38 32D 11/19/1991 3/22/2010 18.3 1 12 45,196 39 30I 1/2/1991 8/6/2010 19.6 1 12 45,197 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 12 45,198 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 12 45,199 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 12 45,545 123 41H 6/3/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 0 12 45,546 123 41H 6/14/1986 9/9/2004 18.2 0 12 45,547 123 41H 3/31/1986 9/9/2004 18.4 0 12 45,634 115 41E 1/25/1987 8/31/2004 17.6 1 12 46,335 50 32K 3/15/1992 5/5/2010 18.1 1 12 46,336 50 32K 1/26/1992 5/5/2010 18.3 1 12 46,337 51 32K 9/2/1991 4/29/2010 18.7 1 12 4302 30 30B 1/28/1993 9/3/2010 17.6 0 12 5303 30 30B 10/31/1992 9/3/2010 17.8 0 12 5304 30 30B 10/25/1992 9/3/2010 17.9 1 12 5305 30 30B 2/21/1989 9/2/2006 17.5 12 5643 114 41D 7/8/1988 9/2/2005 17.2 0 12 5644 114 41D 1/23/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 0 12 5645 114 41D 1/26/1989 9/2/2005 16.6 0 12 5646 114 41D 12/17/1986 8/31/2004 17.7 0 12 5647 114 41D 7/18/1988 5/25/2006 17.9 0 12 5648 121 41D 9/3/1988 5/25/2006 17.7 0 12 5649 121 41D 12/27/1988 9/2/2005 16.7 0 12 5923 101 41B 6/27/1988 9/19/2005 17.2 0 12 5924 101 41B 1/16/1988 9/19/2005 17.7 0 12 5925 101 41B 6/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 12 51,332 9 32E 10/11/1991 3/30/2010 18.5 1 12 51,452 118 41J 9/4/1987 8/31/2004 17.0 0 12 51,453 118 41J 2/16/1987 8/31/2004 17.5 1 12 51,454 118 41J 6/6/1987 8/31/2004 17.2 1 12 51,557 2 30G 4/21/1992 5/13/2010 18.1 0 12 56,377 41 32J 4/6/1992 4/20/2010 18.0 0 12 56,378 41 32J 2/2/1992 4/20/2010 18.2 0 12 5

Page 176: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 160

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,643 7 32C 1/15/1992 3/16/2010 18.2 0 12 52,927 100 41A 8/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 52,928 106 41A 2/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 52,929 106 41A 8/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 52,930 106 41A 4/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 52,931 110 41A 7/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 52,932 110 41A 2/28/1987 9/29/2004 17.6 0 12 52,933 110 41A 7/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 52,934 110 41A 7/18/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 52,935 110 41A 1/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.7 0 12 52,936 110 41A 10/2/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 52,937 112 41A 11/6/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 0 12 52,938 112 41A 2/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 52,939 112 41A 6/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 12 52,940 112 41A 7/8/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 52,941 112 41A 2/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 52,942 112 41A 5/2/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 52,943 112 41A 4/18/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 52,944 112 41A 8/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 52,945 112 41A 1/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 53,209 28 30C 6/16/1992 4/30/2010 17.9 0 12 53,210 28 30C 7/12/1992 4/30/2010 17.8 0 12 53,211 28 30C 8/4/1992 4/30/2010 17.7 1 12 53,460 125 41I 4/9/1988 9/11/2005 17.4 0 12 54,125 116 41F 1/29/1988 2/20/2006 18.1 0 12 54,126 116 41F 7/5/1988 9/25/2005 17.2 1 12 54,285 36 30H 6/7/1993 11/11/2010 17.4 0 12 54,286 36 30H 4/23/1992 5/11/2010 18.0 0 12 54,287 36 30H 11/3/1992 11/11/2010 18.0 1 12 55,200 39 30I 7/23/1993 8/6/2010 17.0 0 12 55,201 39 30I 6/17/1993 8/6/2010 17.1 0 12 55,202 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 12 55,548 123 41H 9/4/1986 9/9/2004 18.0 0 12 55,549 123 41H 10/20/1986 9/9/2004 17.9 0 12 55,550 123 41H 3/26/1987 9/9/2004 17.5 1 12 55,551 123 41H 7/4/1986 6/1/2005 18.9 1 12 56,338 50 32K 5/9/1992 5/5/2010 18.0 0 12 56,339 50 32K 5/15/1993 5/5/2010 17.0 0 12 56,340 52 32K 12/7/1991 4/29/2010 18.4 0 12 56,341 52 32K 12/27/1992 4/29/2010 17.3 1 12 5306 30 30B 4/23/1993 9/3/2010 17.4 0 12 6307 30 30B 11/16/1992 9/3/2010 17.8 0 12 6308 30 30B 1/17/1993 9/3/2010 17.6 0 12 6309 30 30B 9/28/1992 9/3/2010 17.9 0 12 6310 30 30B 12/5/1992 9/3/2010 17.7 0 12 6311 30 30B 8/22/1992 9/3/2010 18.0 1 12 6650 114 41D 1/23/1989 5/25/2006 17.3 0 12 6651 114 41D 11/19/1987 9/2/2005 17.8 0 12 6652 114 41D 2/29/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 0 12 6653 114 41D 4/23/1987 8/31/2004 17.4 0 12 6

Page 177: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 161

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

654 114 41D 1/28/1988 5/25/2006 18.3 0 12 6655 114 41D 10/5/1986 5/23/2005 18.6 1 12 6656 126 41D 3/31/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 0 12 6926 101 41B 12/11/1987 9/19/2005 17.8 0 12 6927 101 41B 11/4/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 1 12 6928 101 41B 12/17/1987 9/19/2005 17.8 1 12 61,286 55 30J 3/25/1993 11/8/2010 17.6 0 12 61,287 55 30J 3/14/1992 11/8/2010 18.7 1 12 61,288 55 30J 12/29/1992 11/8/2010 17.9 1 12 61,455 118 41J 2/24/1987 8/31/2004 17.5 0 12 61,456 118 41J 8/9/1986 8/31/2004 18.1 0 12 61,457 118 41J 12/26/1986 8/31/2004 17.7 1 12 61,458 119 41J 8/4/1987 8/31/2004 17.1 0 12 61,459 119 41J 5/25/1986 8/31/2004 18.3 1 12 61,558 2 30G 11/20/1991 5/13/2010 18.5 0 12 66,379 41 32J 1/1/1992 4/20/2010 18.3 1 12 66,380 41 32J 12/7/1990 4/20/2010 19.4 1 12 66,381 41 32J 4/12/1991 4/20/2010 19.0 1 12 66,660 48 32J 2/18/1989 5/3/2010 21.2 0 12 66,666 41 32J 1/29/1997 9/14/2010 13.6 0 12 66,667 41 32J 12/10/1996 9/14/2010 13.8 0 12 62,946 103 41A 5/9/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 62,947 105 41A 4/26/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 62,948 106 41A 5/12/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 62,949 106 41A 4/13/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 62,950 106 41A 2/1/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 62,951 110 41A 7/18/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 62,952 110 41A 9/1/1987 9/29/2004 17.1 0 12 62,953 110 41A 7/14/1987 9/29/2004 17.2 0 12 62,954 110 41A 9/30/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 62,955 110 41A 12/9/1986 9/29/2004 17.8 0 12 62,956 110 41A 5/28/1986 6/2/2005 19.0 0 12 62,957 110 41A 2/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 62,958 110 41A 3/15/1987 9/29/2004 17.5 0 12 62,959 110 41A 3/15/1987 6/2/2005 18.2 0 12 62,960 110 41A 2/11/1987 6/2/2005 18.3 0 12 62,961 110 41A 11/29/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 62,962 110 41A 12/30/1986 9/29/2004 17.7 1 12 62,963 110 41A 8/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 62,964 111 41A 9/14/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 62,965 111 41A 2/14/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 62,966 111 41A 12/6/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 62,967 112 41A 11/7/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 0 12 62,968 112 41A 6/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 12 62,969 112 41A 7/8/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 62,970 112 41A 6/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 62,971 112 41A 5/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 12 62,972 112 41A 5/13/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 62,973 112 41A 5/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 0 12 62,974 112 41A 7/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 6

Page 178: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 162

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

2,975 112 41A 2/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 62,976 112 41A 1/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 62,977 112 41A 9/23/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 1 12 62,978 112 41A 5/7/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 63,112 120 41K 5/26/1986 8/30/2004 18.3 0 12 63,212 28 30C 12/14/1991 4/30/2010 18.4 0 12 63,213 28 30C 11/6/1991 4/30/2010 18.5 1 12 63,214 28 30C 11/15/1991 4/30/2010 18.5 1 12 63,215 28 30C 9/4/1991 4/30/2010 18.7 1 12 63,216 28 30C 12/11/1991 4/30/2010 18.4 1 12 63,461 125 41I 9/5/1988 9/11/2005 17.0 0 12 64,127 116 41F 1/24/1988 2/20/2006 18.1 1 12 64,128 124 41F 9/4/1987 9/2/2005 18.0 1 12 64,288 36 30H 10/29/1992 11/11/2010 18.0 0 12 64,289 36 30H 3/8/1992 5/11/2010 18.2 0 12 64,290 36 30H 9/29/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 1 12 64,291 36 30H 8/26/1992 11/11/2010 18.2 1 12 64,292 36 30H 11/15/1992 11/11/2010 18.0 1 12 64,293 36 30H 6/1/1992 5/13/2010 17.9 1 12 64,535 38 32D 3/22/1992 3/22/2010 18.0 0 12 64,536 38 32D 11/10/1991 3/22/2010 18.4 0 12 64,537 38 32D 11/19/1991 3/22/2010 18.3 1 12 65,552 123 41H 10/19/1986 9/9/2004 17.9 0 12 65,553 123 41H 6/6/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 0 12 65,554 123 41H 7/4/1986 9/9/2004 18.2 1 12 65,555 123 41H 7/7/1986 9/9/2004 18.2 1 12 66,342 50 32K 2/8/1992 5/5/2010 18.2 1 12 66,343 51 32K 5/15/1992 4/29/2010 18.0 1 12 66,344 51 32K 2/1/1992 4/29/2010 18.2 1 12 658 49 32L 11/26/1991 5/7/2010 18.4 1 12 7312 30 30B 6/21/1992 9/3/2010 18.2 1 12 7313 30 30B 8/12/1993 9/3/2010 17.1 1 12 7314 30 30B 5/8/1993 9/3/2010 17.3 1 12 7315 30 30B 8/19/1992 9/3/2010 18.0 1 12 7657 114 41D 7/8/1988 5/25/2006 17.9 0 12 7658 114 41D 10/24/1987 8/31/2004 16.9 0 12 7659 114 41D 3/1/1987 8/31/2004 17.5 0 12 7660 121 41D 10/10/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 0 12 7661 121 41D 4/2/1989 9/2/2005 16.4 0 12 7662 121 41D 9/3/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 0 12 7929 101 41B 6/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 7930 101 41B 12/15/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 7931 101 41B 5/5/1986 5/27/2005 19.1 1 12 7932 101 41B 9/2/1986 9/13/2004 18.0 1 12 7933 101 41B 11/13/1987 9/19/2005 17.9 1 12 7934 101 41B 8/23/1987 5/27/2005 17.8 1 12 7935 101 41B 8/23/1987 9/13/2004 17.1 1 12 7936 101 41B 12/17/1987 5/29/2006 18.4 1 12 71,096 113 41C 5/17/1987 9/2/2005 18.3 1 12 71,097 113 41C 2/8/1987 9/2/2005 18.6 1 12 7

Page 179: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 163

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

1,289 55 30J 8/15/1992 11/8/2010 18.2 1 12 71,460 118 41J 4/1/1987 8/31/2004 17.4 1 12 71,461 119 41J 3/6/1987 8/31/2004 17.5 0 12 71,462 119 41J 4/4/1986 8/31/2004 18.4 1 12 71,463 119 41J 9/23/1988 8/31/2004 15.9 1 12 71,559 2 30G 3/5/1993 5/13/2010 17.2 1 12 76,382 41 32J 5/16/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 0 12 76,383 46 32J 5/7/1992 4/20/2010 18.0 0 12 76,661 48 32J 8/6/1992 5/3/2010 17.7 1 12 76,668 41 32J 5/26/1997 9/14/2010 13.3 0 12 76,669 41 32J 12/7/1996 9/14/2010 13.8 0 12 76,670 41 32J 7/15/1996 9/14/2010 14.2 0 12 76,671 41 32J 6/24/1997 9/14/2010 13.2 0 12 76,672 41 32J 2/9/1997 9/14/2010 13.6 0 12 76,673 41 32J 2/4/1997 9/14/2010 13.6 1 12 76,674 41 32J 10/17/1996 9/14/2010 13.9 1 12 76,675 41 32J 4/30/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 1 12 72,979 105 41A 7/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 12 72,980 106 41A 11/21/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 72,981 106 41A 11/8/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 1 12 72,982 106 41A 4/13/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 72,983 110 41A 9/1/1987 6/2/2005 17.8 0 12 72,984 110 41A 5/27/1987 9/29/2004 17.3 0 12 72,985 110 41A 5/27/1987 6/2/2005 18.0 0 12 72,986 110 41A 4/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 72,987 110 41A 1/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.7 0 12 72,988 110 41A 1/11/1987 9/29/2004 17.7 0 12 72,989 110 41A 9/13/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 12 72,990 110 41A 8/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 72,991 110 41A 2/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 72,992 110 41A 11/18/1986 9/29/2004 17.9 1 12 72,993 110 41A 9/20/2006 1 12 72,994 110 41A 12/23/1988 9/20/2006 17.7 1 12 72,995 111 41A 5/30/1988 9/20/2006 18.3 1 12 72,996 112 41A 3/20/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 72,997 112 41A 8/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 72,998 112 41A 7/30/1988 9/20/2006 18.1 0 12 72,999 112 41A 11/6/1988 6/2/2005 16.6 0 12 73,000 112 41A 7/15/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 12 73,001 112 41A 9/11/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 1 12 73,002 112 41A 2/11/1989 6/2/2005 16.3 1 12 73,003 112 41A 9/11/1988 6/2/2005 16.7 1 12 73,113 120 41K 7/6/1987 8/30/2004 17.2 1 12 73,114 120 41K 4/17/1987 8/30/2004 17.4 1 12 73,217 28 30C 3/10/1992 4/30/2010 18.1 0 12 73,218 28 30C 7/17/1992 4/30/2010 17.8 0 12 73,219 28 30C 9/14/1991 4/30/2010 18.6 1 12 73,220 28 30C 2/11/1992 4/30/2010 18.2 1 12 73,221 28 30C 8/31/1991 4/30/2010 18.7 1 12 73,222 28 30C 1/17/1992 4/30/2010 18.3 1 12 7

Page 180: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 164

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,223 28 30C 12/17/1991 4/30/2010 18.4 1 12 73,391 122 41G 6/3/1987 6/10/2005 18.0 0 12 73,462 125 41I 6/19/1988 9/11/2005 17.2 0 12 74,129 116 41F 1/29/1988 9/25/2005 17.7 0 12 74,130 116 41F 6/1/1986 6/1/2005 19.0 0 12 74,131 116 41F 2/25/1988 2/20/2006 18.0 1 12 74,132 117 41F 3/25/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 0 12 74,133 117 41F 2/4/1988 2/20/2006 18.0 1 12 74,134 117 41F 2/4/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 1 12 74,294 36 30H 10/9/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 0 12 74,295 36 30H 10/15/1991 5/11/2010 18.6 1 12 74,296 36 30H 5/26/1992 5/11/2010 18.0 1 12 74,297 36 30H 11/16/1992 11/11/2010 18.0 12 74,538 20 32D 6/2/1992 3/22/2010 17.8 0 12 74,539 38 32D 4/4/1992 3/22/2010 18.0 0 12 74,540 38 32D 5/12/1992 3/22/2010 17.9 0 12 74,541 38 32D 9/13/1991 3/22/2010 18.5 0 12 75,203 39 30I 8/6/2010 1 12 75,556 123 41H 6/1/1986 9/9/2004 18.3 0 12 75,557 123 41H 7/3/1987 9/13/2004 17.2 0 12 75,558 123 41H 9/23/1986 9/9/2004 18.0 0 12 75,559 123 41H 3/26/1987 9/13/2004 17.5 1 12 75,560 123 41H 7/7/1988 9/13/2004 16.2 1 12 75,635 115 41E 5/20/1988 8/31/2004 16.3 0 12 76,345 50 32K 1/2/1992 5/5/2010 18.3 0 12 76,346 50 32K 7/21/1992 5/5/2010 17.8 0 12 76,347 51 32K 8/15/1992 4/29/2010 17.7 0 12 759 49 32L 7/3/1992 5/7/2010 17.8 0 12 860 49 32L 12/25/1991 5/7/2010 18.4 1 12 8316 30 30B 5/5/1993 9/3/2010 17.3 0 12 8317 30 30B 3/10/1993 9/3/2010 17.5 1 12 8318 30 30B 11/6/1992 9/3/2010 17.8 1 12 8663 114 41D 1/28/1988 9/2/2005 17.6 0 12 8937 101 41B 12/20/1988 9/20/2006 17.7 0 12 81,098 113 41C 12/13/1986 9/2/2005 18.7 1 12 81,290 55 30J 8/10/1992 11/8/2010 18.2 1 12 81,333 9 32E 12/31/1991 3/30/2010 18.2 1 12 81,560 2 30G 5/5/1992 5/13/2010 18.0 1 12 86,384 41 32J 7/31/1992 4/20/2010 17.7 0 12 86,385 41 32J 7/27/1992 4/20/2010 17.7 0 12 86,386 41 32J 4/21/1992 4/20/2010 18.0 1 12 86,676 41 32J 10/24/1996 9/14/2010 13.9 0 12 86,677 41 32J 6/26/1997 9/14/2010 13.2 0 12 86,678 41 32J 5/8/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 0 12 86,679 41 32J 2/19/1997 9/14/2010 13.6 1 12 86,680 41 32J 6/9/1997 9/14/2010 13.3 1 12 86,681 41 32J 5/2/1996 9/14/2010 14.4 1 12 86,682 41 32J 12/23/1996 9/14/2010 13.7 1 12 83,004 106 41A 4/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 83,005 106 41A 6/27/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 12 8

Page 181: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 165

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,006 106 41A 1/18/1989 9/20/2006 17.7 1 12 83,007 106 41A 8/11/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 83,008 107 41A 9/14/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 83,009 110 41A 5/28/1986 9/29/2004 18.3 0 12 83,010 110 41A 2/11/1987 9/29/2004 17.6 0 12 83,011 110 41A 4/25/1989 6/2/2005 16.1 0 12 83,012 110 41A 4/16/1987 9/29/2004 17.5 1 12 83,013 110 41A 11/18/1986 6/2/2005 18.5 1 12 83,014 110 41A 3/3/1989 6/2/2005 16.2 1 12 83,015 111 41A 9/11/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 1 12 83,016 112 41A 5/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 0 12 83,017 112 41A 7/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 83,018 112 41A 3/20/1989 6/2/2005 16.2 0 12 83,019 112 41A 8/4/1989 6/2/2005 15.8 0 12 83,020 112 41A 4/8/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 83,021 112 41A 2/11/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 83,115 120 41K 9/25/1986 8/30/2004 17.9 0 12 83,224 28 30C 6/29/1993 4/30/2010 16.8 0 12 83,225 28 30C 11/6/1991 4/30/2010 18.5 1 12 83,392 122 41G 10/8/1986 9/6/2004 17.9 0 12 83,393 122 41G 1/10/1987 9/6/2004 17.7 0 12 83,394 122 41G 6/3/1987 9/6/2004 17.3 0 12 83,463 125 41I 2/13/1987 6/1/2005 18.3 0 12 83,464 125 41I 5/16/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 0 12 83,465 125 41I 11/27/1987 9/11/2005 17.8 0 12 83,466 125 41I 5/1/1987 6/1/2005 18.1 0 12 83,467 125 41I 1/28/1987 6/1/2005 18.3 0 12 83,468 125 41I 9/5/1988 6/2/2006 17.7 0 12 83,469 125 41I 6/8/1987 6/1/2005 18.0 0 12 83,470 125 41I 12/9/1987 9/11/2005 17.8 0 12 83,471 125 41I 2/4/1988 9/11/2005 17.6 1 12 84,135 117 41F 3/25/1988 2/20/2006 17.9 0 12 84,136 124 41F 8/4/1988 9/2/2005 17.1 0 12 84,137 124 41F 10/13/1987 9/2/2005 17.9 0 12 84,298 36 30H 8/4/1993 11/11/2010 17.3 1 12 84,542 20 32D 5/14/1992 3/22/2010 17.9 1 12 84,543 20 32D 11/22/1991 3/22/2010 18.3 1 12 84,544 38 32D 1/2/1992 3/22/2010 18.2 0 12 85,204 39 30I 2/21/1994 8/6/2010 16.5 1 12 85,216 19 32M 5/14/1992 3/26/2010 17.9 0 12 85,561 123 41H 9/4/1986 6/1/2005 18.7 0 12 85,562 123 41H 4/25/1986 6/1/2005 19.1 0 12 85,563 123 41H 5/15/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 1 12 85,564 123 41H 8/7/1987 9/9/2004 17.1 1 12 86,348 51 32K 3/6/1992 4/29/2010 18.1 0 12 86,349 51 32K 10/15/1991 4/29/2010 18.5 1 12 861 49 32L 4/3/1992 5/7/2010 18.1 0 12 962 49 32L 2/20/1992 5/7/2010 18.2 1 12 963 49 32L 10/1/1991 5/7/2010 18.6 1 12 964 49 32L 5/1/1992 5/7/2010 18.0 1 12 9

Page 182: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 166

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

65 49 32L 2/19/1992 5/7/2010 18.2 1 12 966 49 32L 5/24/1992 5/7/2010 18.0 1 12 9319 30 30B 12/5/1992 9/3/2010 17.7 0 12 9320 30 30B 2/2/1989 9/2/2006 17.6 1 12 9664 114 41D 7/21/1986 8/31/2004 18.1 0 12 9665 114 41D 2/29/1988 5/25/2006 18.2 0 12 9666 114 41D 4/29/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 1 12 9667 114 41D 4/29/1986 8/31/2004 18.3 1 12 9668 121 41D 10/10/1987 5/25/2006 18.6 0 12 9669 121 41D 10/6/1988 5/25/2006 17.6 0 12 9670 121 41D 4/6/1988 9/2/2005 17.4 1 12 9671 126 41D 8/24/1988 9/2/2005 17.0 0 12 9938 101 41B 12/7/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 12 9939 101 41B 5/16/1988 9/20/2006 18.3 1 12 91,291 55 30J 10/21/1992 11/8/2010 18.0 0 12 91,561 2 30G 12/15/1991 5/13/2010 18.4 0 12 91,562 2 30G 7/20/1992 5/13/2010 17.8 0 12 96,387 41 32J 5/25/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 0 12 96,388 41 32J 1/26/1992 4/20/2010 18.2 0 12 96,389 41 32J 5/26/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 0 12 96,390 41 32J 5/23/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 0 12 96,391 41 32J 1/5/1992 4/20/2010 18.3 1 12 96,392 41 32J 1/21/1992 4/20/2010 18.2 1 12 96,393 41 32J 2/3/1992 4/20/2010 18.2 1 12 96,394 41 32J 7/5/1992 4/20/2010 17.8 1 12 96,395 46 32J 9/29/1991 4/20/2010 18.6 1 12 96,396 46 32J 1/19/1992 4/20/2010 18.3 1 12 96,683 41 32J 3/6/1997 9/14/2010 13.5 0 12 96,684 41 32J 4/26/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 0 12 96,685 41 32J 10/16/1996 9/14/2010 13.9 0 12 96,686 41 32J 9/28/1996 9/14/2010 14.0 1 12 96,687 41 32J 5/28/1997 9/14/2010 13.3 1 12 96,688 41 32J 12/10/1996 9/14/2010 13.8 1 12 96,689 41 32J 12/15/1996 9/14/2010 13.7 1 12 93,022 106 41A 9/2/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 12 93,023 106 41A 8/15/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 0 12 93,024 106 41A 7/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 93,025 106 41A 6/30/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 0 12 93,026 110 41A 7/14/1987 6/2/2005 17.9 0 12 93,027 110 41A 3/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 93,028 110 41A 1/11/1987 6/2/2005 18.4 0 12 93,029 110 41A 2/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 93,030 110 41A 12/30/1988 9/20/2006 17.7 1 12 93,031 112 41A 12/6/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 0 12 93,032 112 41A 9/22/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 12 93,033 112 41A 3/23/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 93,034 112 41A 9/22/1989 6/2/2005 15.7 0 12 93,035 112 41A 5/3/1989 6/2/2005 16.1 0 12 93,036 112 41A 6/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 93,037 112 41A 8/12/1989 9/20/2006 17.1 1 12 9

Page 183: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 167

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,472 125 41I 4/24/1988 9/11/2005 17.4 0 12 93,473 125 41I 6/22/1988 6/2/2006 17.9 0 12 93,474 125 41I 9/27/1987 6/1/2005 17.7 1 12 93,475 125 41I 10/12/1986 6/1/2005 18.6 1 12 94,138 124 41F 7/31/1988 2/20/2006 17.6 1 12 94,299 36 30H 2/28/1993 11/11/2010 17.7 1 12 94,300 36 30H 9/22/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 1 12 94,301 36 30H 5/8/1993 11/11/2010 17.5 1 12 94,302 36 30H 9/17/1991 5/11/2010 18.6 1 12 94,545 20 32D 3/7/1992 3/22/2010 18.0 1 12 95,565 123 41H 9/26/1986 6/1/2005 18.7 0 12 95,566 123 41H 7/3/1987 9/9/2004 17.2 0 12 95,567 123 41H 9/26/1986 9/9/2004 18.0 1 12 95,568 123 41H 5/5/1987 9/9/2004 17.3 1 12 96,350 51 32K 1/13/1991 4/29/2010 19.3 1 12 967 15 32L 12/24/1991 5/7/2010 18.4 1 12 1068 49 32L 10/12/1991 5/7/2010 18.6 1 12 1069 49 32L 11/25/1991 5/7/2010 18.4 1 12 10321 30 30B 1/11/1993 9/3/2010 17.6 0 12 10672 114 41D 3/16/1989 5/25/2006 17.2 0 12 10673 114 41D 7/21/1986 5/23/2005 18.8 0 12 10674 114 41D 4/29/1987 5/23/2005 18.1 1 12 10675 126 41D 2/27/1988 9/2/2005 17.5 0 12 101,334 9 32E 12/12/1991 3/30/2010 18.3 1 12 101,464 118 41J 5/24/1987 8/31/2004 17.3 1 12 101,563 2 30G 2/11/1992 5/13/2010 18.3 1 12 101,564 2 30G 2/15/1992 5/13/2010 18.2 1 12 101,565 2 30G 5/12/1992 5/13/2010 18.0 1 12 106,397 41 32J 12/19/1992 4/20/2010 17.3 0 12 106,398 41 32J 8/31/1991 4/20/2010 18.6 1 12 106,399 41 32J 12/9/1991 4/20/2010 18.4 1 12 106,400 41 32J 8/9/1991 4/20/2010 18.7 1 12 106,401 41 32J 5/30/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 1 12 106,402 41 32J 6/15/1992 4/20/2010 17.8 1 12 106,403 41 32J 4/2/1992 4/20/2010 18.0 1 12 106,404 46 32J 9/26/1991 4/20/2010 18.6 1 12 106,405 46 32J 1/10/1992 4/20/2010 18.3 1 12 106,406 46 32J 3/9/1992 4/20/2010 18.1 1 12 106,690 41 32J 5/16/1997 9/14/2010 13.3 0 12 106,691 41 32J 11/22/1997 9/14/2010 12.8 0 12 106,692 41 32J 12/23/1996 9/14/2010 13.7 0 12 106,693 41 32J 8/16/1997 9/14/2010 13.1 0 12 106,694 41 32J 4/1/1997 9/14/2010 13.5 0 12 106,695 41 32J 2/17/1997 9/14/2010 13.6 0 12 106,696 41 32J 1/21/1997 9/14/2010 13.6 0 12 106,697 41 32J 1/19/1997 9/14/2010 13.7 1 12 106,698 41 32J 4/27/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 1 12 106,699 41 32J 3/2/1997 9/14/2010 13.5 1 12 106,700 41 32J 8/7/1997 9/14/2010 13.1 1 12 106,701 41 32J 3/30/1997 9/14/2010 13.5 1 12 10

Page 184: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 168

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,702 41 32J 10/9/1996 9/14/2010 13.9 1 12 101,603 14 32H 6/8/1991 4/30/2010 18.9 1 12 101,604 14 32H 6/5/1991 4/30/2010 18.9 1 12 103,038 103 41A 12/6/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 103,039 105 41A 12/19/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 103,040 106 41A 9/24/1988 9/20/2006 18.0 0 12 103,041 106 41A 9/9/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 12 103,042 106 41A 2/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 103,043 106 41A 12/11/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 103,044 110 41A 9/28/1988 6/2/2005 16.7 0 12 103,045 110 41A 2/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 103,046 110 41A 6/20/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 103,047 112 41A 12/6/1988 6/2/2005 16.5 0 12 103,048 112 41A 3/23/1989 6/2/2005 16.2 0 12 103,049 112 41A 7/30/1988 6/2/2005 16.8 0 12 103,050 112 41A 11/21/1988 9/20/2006 17.8 1 12 103,395 122 41G 10/8/1986 6/10/2005 18.7 0 12 103,476 125 41I 6/5/1988 6/2/2006 18.0 0 12 103,477 125 41I 9/21/1986 6/1/2005 18.7 0 12 103,478 125 41I 12/9/1987 6/2/2006 18.5 0 12 103,479 125 41I 10/4/1987 6/2/2006 18.7 1 12 103,480 125 41I 3/3/1988 9/11/2005 17.5 1 12 103,481 125 41I 3/3/1988 6/2/2006 18.2 1 12 104,139 116 41F 7/1/1988 2/20/2006 17.6 1 12 104,140 124 41F 10/13/1987 2/20/2006 18.4 0 12 104,303 36 30H 10/3/1992 11/11/2010 18.1 0 12 104,304 36 30H 6/14/1992 5/11/2010 17.9 1 12 105,569 123 41H 9/1/1986 9/9/2004 18.0 0 12 105,570 123 41H 4/25/1986 9/9/2004 18.4 0 12 105,571 123 41H 2/14/1987 9/9/2004 17.6 0 12 105,572 123 41H 4/3/1987 9/9/2004 17.4 1 12 105,573 123 41H 11/7/1986 9/9/2004 17.8 1 12 105,574 123 41H 2/12/1987 9/9/2004 17.6 1 12 105,575 123 41H 2/26/1987 9/9/2004 17.5 1 12 1070 49 32L 11/9/1991 5/7/2010 18.5 1 12 11322 30 30B 9/5/1992 9/3/2010 18.0 12 11676 114 41D 5/12/1986 5/23/2005 19.0 1 12 11677 126 41D 8/3/1989 9/2/2005 16.1 0 12 111,335 9 32E 8/12/1992 3/30/2010 17.6 1 12 111,465 118 41J 3/4/1987 8/31/2004 17.5 1 12 111,466 119 41J 8/30/1986 8/31/2004 18.0 1 12 111,467 119 41J 11/19/1986 8/31/2004 17.8 1 12 116,407 41 32J 1/26/1992 4/20/2010 18.2 0 12 116,408 41 32J 2/10/1992 4/20/2010 18.2 0 12 116,409 41 32J 6/3/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 0 12 116,410 41 32J 10/4/1991 4/20/2010 18.5 0 12 116,411 41 32J 5/12/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 1 12 116,412 41 32J 7/4/1991 4/20/2010 18.8 1 12 116,413 41 32J 9/6/1991 4/20/2010 18.6 1 12 116,414 41 32J 4/8/1992 4/20/2010 18.0 1 12 11

Page 185: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 169

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,415 46 32J 3/14/1992 4/20/2010 18.1 0 12 116,416 46 32J 8/18/1992 4/20/2010 17.7 1 12 116,417 46 32J 5/1/1992 4/20/2010 18.0 1 12 116,418 46 32J 4/7/1992 4/20/2010 18.0 1 12 116,419 46 32J 11/29/1991 4/20/2010 18.4 1 12 116,420 46 32J 10/12/1992 4/20/2010 17.5 1 12 116,703 41 32J 8/25/1996 9/14/2010 14.1 0 12 116,704 41 32J 9/2/1996 9/14/2010 14.0 0 12 116,705 41 32J 7/26/1997 9/14/2010 13.1 0 12 116,706 41 32J 4/27/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 1 12 116,707 41 32J 4/21/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 1 12 116,708 41 32J 6/19/1997 9/14/2010 13.2 1 12 116,709 41 32J 7/27/1996 9/14/2010 14.1 1 12 116,710 41 32J 12/17/1996 9/14/2010 13.7 1 12 116,711 41 32J 10/9/1996 9/14/2010 13.9 1 12 116,727 41 32J 8/8/1997 9/15/2010 13.1 0 12 116,728 41 32J 4/26/1997 9/15/2010 13.4 1 12 113,051 106 41A 3/21/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 113,052 110 41A 3/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 0 12 113,053 110 41A 2/6/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 113,054 110 41A 9/13/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 0 12 113,055 110 41A 3/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 113,056 110 41A 9/7/1986 9/29/2004 18.1 1 12 113,057 110 41A 9/7/1986 6/2/2005 18.7 1 12 113,058 111 41A 7/12/1988 9/20/2006 18.2 0 12 113,482 125 41I 6/5/1988 9/11/2005 17.3 0 12 113,483 125 41I 10/4/1987 9/11/2005 17.9 1 12 114,141 116 41F 7/1/1988 9/25/2005 17.2 1 12 114,305 36 30H 8/27/1992 11/11/2010 18.2 1 12 114,546 20 32D 2/1/1992 3/22/2010 18.1 0 12 114,547 38 32D 4/28/1992 3/22/2010 17.9 0 12 115,576 123 41H 4/3/1987 9/13/2004 17.4 1 12 115,577 123 41H 5/10/1987 6/1/2005 18.1 1 12 115,578 123 41H 5/5/1987 6/1/2005 18.1 1 12 116,351 51 32K 9/1/1991 4/29/2010 18.7 1 12 1171 49 32L 11/19/1991 5/7/2010 18.5 0 12 1272 49 32L 12/15/1991 5/7/2010 18.4 1 12 12678 114 41D 4/6/1988 5/25/2006 18.1 1 12 121,566 2 30G 10/10/1991 5/13/2010 18.6 0 12 121,567 2 30G 6/8/1992 5/13/2010 17.9 0 12 121,568 2 30G 12/17/1991 5/13/2010 18.4 1 12 126,421 41 32J 6/15/1992 4/20/2010 17.8 0 12 126,422 41 32J 8/15/1991 4/20/2010 18.7 0 12 126,423 41 32J 8/8/1991 4/20/2010 18.7 1 12 126,424 46 32J 11/5/1991 4/20/2010 18.5 0 12 126,425 46 32J 6/22/1992 4/20/2010 17.8 1 12 126,712 41 32J 4/24/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 1 12 126,713 41 32J 10/14/1996 9/14/2010 13.9 1 12 126,714 41 32J 9/13/1996 9/14/2010 14.0 1 12 126,715 41 32J 12/12/1996 9/14/2010 13.8 1 12 12

Page 186: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 170

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

6,716 41 32J 8/14/1996 9/14/2010 14.1 1 12 121,605 14 32H 7/9/1992 4/30/2010 17.8 0 12 123,059 106 41A 10/27/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 0 12 123,060 106 41A 1/3/1989 9/20/2006 17.7 1 12 123,061 106 41A 9/12/1989 9/20/2006 17.0 1 12 123,062 106 41A 5/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.4 1 12 123,063 106 41A 4/5/1989 9/20/2006 17.5 1 12 123,064 106 41A 7/10/1989 9/20/2006 17.2 1 12 123,065 106 41A 10/28/1989 9/20/2006 16.9 1 12 123,066 110 41A 2/17/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 123,067 110 41A 11/18/1986 9/29/2004 17.9 1 12 123,068 110 41A 11/18/1986 6/2/2005 18.5 1 12 123,069 110 41A 2/25/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 1 12 123,070 110 41A 6/20/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 123,071 112 41A 6/4/1989 9/20/2006 17.3 1 12 123,116 120 41K 9/3/1986 8/30/2004 18.0 0 12 123,484 125 41I 7/8/1988 9/11/2005 17.2 0 12 123,485 125 41I 8/12/1988 6/2/2006 17.8 0 12 123,486 125 41I 8/12/1988 9/11/2005 17.1 0 12 123,487 125 41I 6/6/1989 6/2/2006 17.0 0 12 123,488 125 41I 6/22/1988 9/11/2005 17.2 0 12 123,489 125 41I 2/25/1987 6/1/2005 18.3 1 12 123,490 125 41I 6/25/1988 6/2/2006 17.9 1 12 123,491 125 41I 6/25/1988 9/11/2005 17.2 1 12 123,492 125 41I 6/19/1988 6/2/2006 18.0 1 12 124,306 36 30H 2/23/1992 5/11/2010 18.2 1 12 124,307 36 30H 8/8/1992 5/11/2010 17.8 1 12 124,308 36 30H 1/14/1993 5/11/2010 17.3 1 12 12323 30 30B 5/8/1993 9/3/2010 17.3 0 12 13324 30 30B 12/30/1992 9/3/2010 17.7 12 131,569 2 30G 3/31/1992 5/13/2010 18.1 1 12 136,426 41 32J 3/17/1992 4/20/2010 18.1 0 12 136,427 41 32J 5/26/1992 4/20/2010 17.9 1 12 136,428 41 32J 7/28/1992 4/20/2010 17.7 1 12 136,429 46 32J 1/25/1992 4/20/2010 18.2 1 12 136,717 41 32J 12/21/1996 9/14/2010 13.7 0 12 136,718 41 32J 6/11/1997 9/14/2010 13.3 0 12 136,719 41 32J 12/1/1996 9/14/2010 13.8 0 12 136,720 41 32J 5/16/1997 9/14/2010 13.3 1 12 136,721 41 32J 8/8/1997 9/14/2010 13.1 1 12 136,722 41 32J 9/3/1996 9/14/2010 14.0 1 12 136,723 41 32J 5/31/1997 9/14/2010 13.3 1 12 136,724 41 32J 9/26/1996 9/14/2010 14.0 1 12 136,725 41 32J 4/18/1997 9/14/2010 13.4 1 12 133,072 106 41A 2/11/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 12 133,073 106 41A 10/9/1988 9/20/2006 17.9 1 12 133,493 125 41I 7/8/1988 6/2/2006 17.9 0 12 133,494 125 41I 12/25/1987 6/2/2006 18.4 1 12 13940 101 41B 10/4/1988 9/13/2004 15.9 0 03,074 105 41A 4/3/1992 9/20/2006 14.5 0 0

Page 187: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX A 171

Student Number

Teacher Number

School Number Birthdate Exam Date

Age (in

years)

Gender F = 0, M = 1

Grade Level

CTSR Score

3,075 112 41A 12/17/1989 9/20/2006 16.8 0 04,601 5 32B 12/4/1992 3/18/2010 17.3 1 0941 101 41B 2/19/1989 9/20/2006 17.6 0 1942 101 41B 8/1/1990 5/29/2006 15.8 0 13,076 104 41A 5/2/1992 9/20/2006 14.4 0 13,077 104 41A 11/24/1991 9/20/2006 14.8 1 13,078 107 41A 8/18/1990 9/20/2006 16.1 0 1943 101 41B 3/8/1989 9/19/2005 16.5 0 2944 101 41B 2/16/1988 9/19/2005 17.6 0 21,644 7 32C 9/24/1993 3/16/2010 16.5 0 23,226 28 30C 11/12/1992 4/30/2010 17.5 0 23,660 35 30E 4/26/1995 4/9/2010 15.0 0 2945 101 41B 10/9/1987 5/27/2005 17.6 0 33,396 122 41G 5/18/1988 9/6/2004 16.3 1 33,661 35 30E 5/18/1995 4/9/2010 14.9 1 35,205 39 30I 4/14/2010 33,662 35 30E 11/3/1993 4/9/2010 16.4 1 44,309 36 30H 11/22/1992 5/13/2010 17.5 0 44,310 36 30H 10/1/1992 5/13/2010 17.6 0 45,894 18 30D 5/14/1997 4/30/2010 13.0 0 43,079 100 41A 12/12/1990 9/20/2006 15.8 0 53,080 100 41A 2/17/1991 9/20/2006 15.6 1 53,081 107 41A 10/7/1991 9/20/2006 15.0 1 54,602 5 32B 12/2/1994 3/18/2010 15.3 0 5946 101 41B 12/11/1987 5/29/2006 18.5 0 64,142 117 41F 6/27/1990 2/20/2006 15.7 0 64,143 116 41F 1/7/1987 6/1/2005 18.4 0 73,082 110 41A 2/8/1988 6/2/2005 17.3 0 84,144 116 41F 11/23/1988 6/1/2005 16.5 0 10

Page 188: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX B

Free/Reduced-Rate Lunch Data

0-10%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

41-50%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

Grade 9 113 30.38 Grade 10 35 20.00

Grade 10 46 12.37 Grade 11 103 58.86

Grade 11 159 42.74 Grade 12 37 21.14

Grade 12 54 14.52 Total 175

Total 372

11-20%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

51-60%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

Grade 7 194 7.42 Grade 7 7 11.29

Grade 8 114 4.36 Grade 8 11 17.74

Grade 9 396 15.14 Grade 9 11 17.74

Grade 10 520 19.89 Grade 10 11 17.74

Grade 11 980 37.48 Grade 11 18 29.03

Grade 12 411 15.72 Grade 12 4 6.45

Total 2615 Total 62

21-30%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

71-80%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

Grade 7 130 8.64 Grade 9 97 31.49

Grade 8 157 10.43 Grade 10 99 32.14

Grade 9 275 18.27 Grade 11 75 24.35

Grade 10 468 31.10 Grade 12 37 12.01

Grade 11 315 20.93 Total 308

Grade 12 160 10.63

Total 1505

31-40%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

81-90%

F/R Lunch

Range

n

Percentage

of Total in

Range

Grade 7 119 11.84 Grade 9 286 51.53

Grade 8 126 12.54 Grade 10 84 15.14

Grade 9 199 19.80 Grade 11 122 21.98

Grade 10 284 28.26 Grade 12 63 11.35

Grade 11 224 22.29 Total 555

Grade 12 53 5.27

Total 1005

*These data are primarily organized by percent qualifying free/reduced-

rate lunch range and then further break down to the number of

students in a particular grade level. It is important to note that the

specific number of students in each grade level at a particular

free/reduced-rate lunch range was obtained based on the average

percent qualifying free/reduced-rate lunch of a particular school. On a

related note, no schools sampled had an average qualifying

free/reduced rate lunch percentage falling in 61-70% or 91-100%.

172

Page 189: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX C

Demographic Data

School

Number

City

Population

School

Enrollment

Qualifying

F/R Lunch

Percent of

School

Sampled

32L 2684 565 18.0% 12.7%

30B 1896 474 22.0% 53.2%

30D 1896 449 24.0% 44.3%

30A 5305 609 24.0% 3.8%

41D 57053 1443 27.0% 22.9%

41I 57053 1253 22.0% 7.8%

41H 57053 1109 15.5% 13.5%

41B 1065 581 88.5% 44.9%

41C 34606 1462 15.0% 10.4%

30J 1418 278 32.0% 69.4%

32E 320 62 52.0% 71.0%

41J 25780 1400 8.8% 9.4%

30G 51818 1291 34.0% 7.8%

30H 51818 1004 43.0% 16.3%

32J 85806 1538 17.0% 24.5%

32C 1320 185 36.0% 20.5%

32H 2394 404 14.0% 8.9%

41A 56690 1576 14.5% 90.7%

41K 901 288 12.2% 11.8%

30C 29494 1307 8.0% 8.3%

41G 3705 560 32.0% 30.2%

32G 1020 216 31.0% 15.7%

30E 8775 1652 8.0% 7.9%

30K 8775 1177 11.0% 9.7%

41F 14223 1809 22.0% 20.2%

32D 2584 320 29.0% 74.1%

32B 1850 345 38.0% 15.4%

30I 596974 294 72.0% 100.0%

30F 596974 656 84.0% 44.8%

32M 865 163 43.0% 6.7%

32I 4202 519 14.0% 22.0%

32F 2337 351 13.0% 22.8%

32A 287151 34 59.0% 52.9%

41E 1553 442 17.0% 12.9%

32K 1722 508 34.0% 82.1%

173

Page 190: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX D

Google Forms

D.1 Educator Request Form

EducatorRequestfor theClassroomTest ofScientificReasoning

The Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTSR) was initially developed by Anton

Lawson (1978). This assessment was constructed to measure students' thinking skill

ability. The multiple choice version of the test was developed for multiple reasons

including the ability to score the assessment easier and more effectively (Lawson,

2000). This form was built as a way for educators to notify the John C. Deming

Research Group of an interest in obtaining the CTSR to use for classroom purposes.

Last Modified: March 23, 2011

* Required

Educator Name *

(Last Name, First Name)

E-mail Address *

(This should indicate your affiliation with a school or district)

Name of School *

174

Page 191: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX D 175

School Street Address *

City, State, and Zip Code *

Name of Principal *

School Website (if any)

Where did you hear about the CTSR? *

(Please check any or all that apply)

Research Article

Website

Conference or Seminar

Personal Coorespondence

Other:

Why are you interested in obtaining the CTSR? *

Will you want CTSR normative data for your students/classes? *

Yes

No

Submit

Powered by Google Docs

Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms

To complete this form and request access to the CTSR, go to http://goo.gl/

xuWAk.

Page 192: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX D 176

D.2 CTSR Data Collection Form

CTSR

Data

Collection

Form

Please enter the information for one student and click submit. You can then continue

to enter the information for the rest of your students by clicking "go back to the

form". Thank you so much for your continuing cooperation with this effort!

Last Modified: April 21, 2011

* Required

Student ID Number *

Teacher Last Name *

Choose which of the following is the best description of this test *

Pre-Test

Post-Test

Neither

School Name *

Brainerd High School, MN

Century High School, MN

Laura Jeffrey Academy, MN

Messmer High School, Milwaukee WI

Page 193: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX D 177

Other:

Student Birthdate *

Month/Day/Year (ie. XX/XX/19XX)

Exam Date *

Month/Day/Year (ie. XX/XX/20XX)

Student Gender *

Female

Male

Student Grade Level *

For example, if the student is a college sophomore, choose "14"...

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Other:

Student Answers *

A B C D E

CTSR Answer 1

Page 194: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX D 178

A B C D E

CTSR Answer 2

CSTR Answer 3

CTSR Answer 4

CTSR Answer 5

CTSR Answer 6

CTSR Answer 7

CTSR Answer 8

CTSR Answer 9

CTSR Answer 10

CTSR Answer 11

CTSR Answer 12

CTSR Answer 13

CTSR Answer 14

CTSR Answer 15

CTSR Answer 16

CTSR Answer 17

CTSR Answer 18

CTSR Answer 19

CTSR Answer 20

CTSR Answer 21

Page 195: CREATION OF NATIONAL NORMS FOR SCIENTIFIC …modeling.asu.edu/modeling/O'DonnellJ-Thesis-CTSRnorms.pdfcreation of national norms for scientific thinking skills using the classroom

APPENDIX D 179

A B C D E

CTSR Answer 22

CTSR Answer 23

CTSR Answer 24

Submit

Powered by Google Docs

Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms

If you currently have access to the CTSR and wish to contribute to the Na-

tional Norm Project and/or wish to receive a comparison between your students

and the national norms, go to http://goo.gl/xzKBd.