creativity in the workforce
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 1
Creativity in the Workforce Art of Science Learning May 16, 2011
Mary Wright – The Conference Board Randy Cohen - Americans for the Arts
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 2
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 3
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 4
Key Points
! Creativity and innovation are valued, and valuable ! There is evidence that arts training/competency relates to scientific
success ! Investing in the arts contributes to economic vitality ! Both schools and business want to encourage creativity but neither
segment supports its development to the extent desired ! Additional discussions are needed amongst all stakeholders to
realign needs and resources
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 5
Importance of Applied Skills Only Increasing
48.8%
63.3%
64.0%
64.0%
64.3%
64.4%
65.9%
66.9%
67.1%
73.6%
74.2%
77.4%
77.8%
Mathematics Foreign Languages
Life Long Learning / Self Direction Written Communications
Ethics / Social Responsibility Professionalism / Work Ethic
Oral Communications Leadership
Diversity Creativity / Innovation
Teamwork Information Technology
Crtivial Thinking / Problem Solving
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
Over Next Five Years Importance Will Increase:
* Applied Skill
The More Successful a Scientist, the More Likely He or She Is to Have One
or More Adult Arts and Crafts Avocations
RATIO OR CHI SQ P VALUE
PHI (r)
PUBLIC v. SIGMA XI 1.06 1.09 0.18 0.67 .005 ROYAL SOCIETY v. SIGMA XI 1.79 2.92 30.57 < 0.0001 .010 NATIONAL ACADEMY v SIGMA XI 1.70 2.57 23.93 < 0.0001 .065 NOBELISTS v. SIGMA XI 2.85 31.79 659.75 < 0.0001 .366 ROYAL SOCIETY v. PUBLIC 1.69 2.68 25.30 < 0.0001 .066 NATIONAL ACADEMY v. PUBLIC 1.60 2.36 19.39 < 0.0001 .059 NOBELISTS v. PUBLIC 2.69 29.13 617.20 < 0.0001 .360 NOBELISTS v. ROYAL SOC. 0.95 0.88 0.37 0.55 .014 NOBELISTS v. ROYAL SOCIETY 1.59 10.88 217.20 < 0.0001 .318 NOBELISTS v. NATIONAL ACADEMY 1.68 12.34 256.03 < 0.0001 .380
Continuous Arts Participation Correlates with STEM Innovation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Michigan Engineers MEDC Awardees
!"
!"
!"!"
* !"
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 8
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 9
Indentifying Creativity
Which best demonstrates creativity?*
(#1=most popular choice) Business/ Employers
School Superintendents
Problem-identification or articulation 1 9 Ability to identify new patterns of behavior or new combination of actions 2 3
Integration of knowledge across different disciplines 3 2 Ability to originate new ideas 4 6 Comfort with the notion of “no right answer” 5 11 Fundamental curiosity 6 10 Originality and inventiveness in work 7 4 Problem-solving 8 1 Ability to take risks 9(t) 8 Tolerance of ambiguity 9(t) 7 Ability to communicate new ideas to others 11 5 *Rank determined by percentage or respondents selecting skill. Respondents allowed to select only three skills.
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 10
Walking the Talk
Music
Foreign language
Drama arts Studio arts
Creative writing
Independent study Math/Stat/Computer
science
Coach/Mentoring
Travel/Study abroad
Biology/Chemistry/Physics
Afterschool enrichment
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Required Course
Per
cent
bel
ieve
dev
elop
s cr
eativ
ity e
mpl
oyer
s se
ek
Schools
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 11
Walking the Talk
Music
Foreign language Drama arts Studio arts
Creative writing
Independent study Math/Stat/Computer
science
Coach/Mentoring
Travel/Study abroad
Biology/Chemistry/Physics
Afterschool enrichment
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Schools
Percent Provided as an Elective
Per
cent
bel
ieve
dev
elop
s cr
eativ
ity e
mpl
oyer
s se
ek
Improved Academic Performance
Arts Students Outperform Non-Arts Students:
Average Points Better on SAT Scores
15% of Test Takers
20% of Test Takers
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 15
Creativity is hard to find; somewhat identifiable and not a focus of training
! 72% of respondents identified creativity as a concern in the hiring process. Of those, 85% can’t find the applicants they want
! Employers who want creative employees identify them as those who were self-employed (67%); had background in the arts (57%) or in communications (50%)
! 68% of respondents report high need for training in Creativity / Innovation, yet less than a third provide training*
*Source: The Ill-Prepared U.S. Workforce
Inspiration at Valley Forge
Artists and Ingenuity
Battles of the Bands
<SPAN< span>
Bands of the Battle . . .
Tensegrity Engineering: The Kurilpa Bridge in Brisbane, Australia
!"#$%&%'#(%)*($+,)-.#$/012#,3**"
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 21
Additional discussions are needed amongst all stakeholders to realign resources to meet the needs and desired outcomes
! Creativity is an important skill for the workforce ! Defining Creativity is not consistent between business and
educators ! Despite reported importance, training to enhance creativity is not
provided by either the schools or businesses – Walking the Talk ! Employers acknowledge that training in the arts is used in hiring as
an indicator of creativity ! Employers need to evaluate how well their corporate support of
education and employee training programs match creativity’s strategic value
! Dialogue is needed within and across all sectors to foster creativity in the workforce
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 22
How can we “elevate the debate”?
• It’s clear to some that there is a tight connection between arts education, arts engagement, creative activities, and critical business skills – for example, teamwork, discipline and rigor, problem solving, empathy. Why isn’t this clear to everyone?
• What specific research would help make this case? How do we tightly and concretely draw the linkages?
• What are some of the possible barriers when trying to convince people to take action?
• Given the above, what are appropriate next steps: " Research? " Engaging the business community? " Engaging society more broadly? " What would move you?
www.conferenceboard.org © 2011 The Conference Board, Inc. | 23
Thank You [email protected]
www.conference-board.org
[email protected] www.artsusa.org