creekview - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

8/3/2019 Creekview - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/creekview-campus-improvement-plan-2011-2012 1/18

C-FBISD VISION:

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2011-2012

Creekview High School

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District

Joseph LaPuma, Principal



BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Nancy Cline, President James Goode, Vice President Richard Fleming, Secretary

Lynn Chaffin, Assistant Secretary Frank Shor, Board Member

Nancy Watten, Board Member Karin Webb, Board Member

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH

SCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

CreekviewEarly College

Newman SmithR. L. TurnerRanchview

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Blalack BushFieldLongPerryPolk

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES

Supporting Objective 1:

Continuously increase student achievement


Continuously improve the learning environment forstudents and staff


Continuously increase operational effectiveness


Continuously increase stakeholder confidence andsupport of our school system

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

BlairBlanton

CarrolltonCentral

Country PlaceDavis

Farmers BranchFreemanFurneaux

GoodKent

LandryLas ColinasLa VillitaMcCoy

McKamyMcLaughlinMcWhorterRainwaterRiverchaseRosemeade

Sheffield IntermediateSheffield Primary

Stark StricklandThompson

CENTERS

Mary Grimes Education CenterSalazar Transition School

Kelly Pre-K CenterHuie Education CenterCLC Learning Complex

C-FBISD GOAL

The Goal of the Carrollton-FarmersBranch ISD is high achievement for

all students.

2



3

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

BUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVESSteve Hamberger

PARENT REPRESENTATIVES

Leigh HusemanAmy FuscoMaryAnn Presson

ADMINISTRATORS

Joe LaPumaGinny BiggsPhyllis ReedKimberly GuinnMelissa WesleySkip Barber

STAFF REPRESENTATIVES

Stacy LovettAbby Harrison

Carolyn ChieverDarcy PerreaultEmily Johnson

Pete HazzardStacy HuntVictor Monreal

Melissa MendozaCindy Branson

Claudia WallaceDan Marek Sarah JonesLars Nyberg

Bryan Womack

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW :

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date



4

C-FBISD VISION

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments ofAcademic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce readywithout remediation.

MISSION

Together with families and community we commit all districtresources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as:

A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner

A complex thinker An effective communicator

STATEMENT OF BELIEFS

We believe that:

The economic, political and societal success of ourcountry depends upon a quality education for all.

Diversity strengthens the community and enriches thefabric of our society.

It is the responsibility of the entire community topartner in the educational process.

Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturingenvironment.

Belonging to a family, to a school and to a community

is vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning. People learn at different rates, have differentcapacities and that each person’s educational pathdeserves to be valued equally.

Learning empowers people to reach their fullpotential: physically, mentally, socially, andemotionally

Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.

GRADUATE PROFILE

Graduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:

Responsible individuals who: Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior Appreciate the value of diversity

Function effectively as team members

Competent learners who: Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options Produce quality products

Complex thinkers who: Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking

Effective communicators who:

Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly



5

TARGET AREAS

Title I – Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase parental involvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I – School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments.TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.



6

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACH IEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENT

CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THELEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR

STUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASEOPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND

SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM

Performance Targets:

Academic Performance Index (API) STAAR – Satisfactory STAAR – Advanced Graduation Rate SAT Mean ACT Mean

Recognized/Exemplary Distinction

DesignationsAYP


Employee Job Satisfaction Campus Environment Curriculum and Instruction

Student: Attendance Rate

Disciplinary Placements


Staff Productivity Index (SPI)


Education Productivity Index (EPI) API SPI

Parent Satisfaction

Employee Campus Communications

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS



THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTSSUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4


CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNINGENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONALEFFECTIVENESS

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDERCONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL

SYSTEM

7

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR – Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/

MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENT

Begin Instructional Rounds Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 STAAR, TAKS, Survey Data

Staff Time,DistrictResources forSubs

Implement Reader’s Writers WorkshopCarolyn Chiever, EmilyJohnson, KimberlyGuinn

2011-2012 STAAR Reading/ELA, TAKS,Classroom observations, Staff Time, PD

Implement 9 th Grade Initiative- will focus on team,student, parent meetings for at risk students

Melissa Wesley, JanetBeeler, Joe LaPuma,Admin Team

2011-2012 100% from 11-12 Cohortbecome 10 th graders Staff Time

Create AYP Geometry Action Plan Team/Tutorials

Joe LaPuma, PhyllisReed, MelissaMendoza, CindyBranson,

2011-2012 TAKS, Unit Assessments,Tutorial Data

Staff time,Principal Budget,MathCoordinatior

Implement SSR- Student Selected Reading SSR Team 2011-2012 STAAR Reading/ELA, TAKS,Classroom observations, Library books

Provide acceleration for students identified as At Risk Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 STAAR, TAKS Comp Ed Funds$22,797


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations



Provide Edugence Training to help teachers makeeducational decisions

Wes Baker, MelissaMendoza 2011-2012 Survey

Begin after school tutorials- Biology

Claudia Wallace,Cass Cartmill,Courtney Perkins,John Johnson,Charlie Liles, Jon

Kitsopolous

Spring 2012 STAAR/EOCTeacherGeneratedLessons








SYSTEM

8


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE

TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENT

Continue with Graduation Team Meetings Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 Graduation Rate Staff Time

Begin 9th grade Graduation Team Meeting Melissa Wesley 2011-2012 9 th Grade Passing Rate Staff Time








SYSTEM

9


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean




Offer Revolution Prep on Campus Stacy Lovett 9/2011-7/2012 Improved SAT Scores Rev. Prep

Create PSAT Lessons that are delivered throughELA Classes w/ counselors Stacy Lovett, 10/2011 Improved ACT Scores Released SATTestsIncrease participation in student SAT/ACTprograms identifying top 100 students andproviding them with consistent communicationand advocacy.

Stacy Lovett, GinnyBiggs 9/2011-7/2012

Increased # of studentsparticipating in prepprograms

PSAT Data,AVID Data

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction – I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.



Provide instructional coaching and support for keyteachers.

DistrictCoordinators, JoeLaPuma

2011-2012 Increased jobsatisfaction

Principal budget

Provide mentor teachers for new staff members.Joe LaPuma, CampusIF’s 2011-2012

Increased jobsatisfaction

Principal budget

Begin Monthly breakfast meetings with 1 st, 2n , &3rd year staff throughout year.

Counselors,Administrators, IF’s 2011-2012 Increased job

satisfactionPrincipalbudget








SYSTEM

10


Performance Target: Employee: Campus Environment – I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.



Provide opportunities for input and participationthrough committees, faculty meetings, andprofessional development.

Joe LaPuma, GinnyBiggs, Phyllis Reed 2011-2012 Increased survey results

Develop leadership capacity throughout thecampus

Joe LaPuma, GinnyBiggs, Phyllis Reed 2011-2012 Increased survey results -Decreased staff

absenteeism








SYSTEM

11


Performance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction – Teachers work amicably together on common problems.




Provide Positive professional development whichincludes setting expectations & norms

Joe LaPumaGinny Biggs, PhyllisReed, KimberlyGuinn, Skip Barber,Melissa Wesley

2011-2012 Increased survey results

Maintain Campus Improvement Committee Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 Increased survey resultsSchedule opportunities for teacher collaborationand classroom observations DM/IF’s 2011-2012

Using Edugence (checkpoint data) to identifyinglow se’s and creating lessons to target andimprove those low se’s

DM/IF’s 2011-2012 Checkpoint, EOC, TAKSData


Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate




Focus on students with highest absences &

intervene with a parent meeting after AP,Counselor, & Attendance Clerk Meeting

Phyllis Reed,Attendance Clerks, 2011-2012 AEIS Report

Hold Absence Make-Up Dates Wed. & Saturdaythroughout the year Phyllis Reed 2011-2012 Attendance Data

Hold a Perfect Attendance Social 2x a Year Ginny Biggs 2011-2012 Attendance Data








SYSTEM

12


Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements



Monitor Referrals & Discipline Data Phyllis Reed, AllAdministrators 2011-2012 Decrease in DMC, OSS,

& AEP Placements Staff- Admin

Implement 9th

Grade Initiative

Melissa Wesley, Joe

LaPuma,Janet Beeler 2011-2012

Decrease by 10% # of

referrals, DMC, OSS, &AEP for 9th graders

Develop a Repeating 9 th Graders InterventionPlan-

Phyllis Reed,Kimberly Guinn, SkipBarber, Counselors

2011-2012Decrease by 10% # ofreferrals, DMC, OSS, &AEP for 9th graders








SYSTEM

13

*

Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)




Balance teacher/student schedules to makeeffective use of the master schedule

Ginny Biggs, AnitaLeclaire, Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 Good Student to teacher

ratio, few classes over 30MasterSchedule

Analyze ERG Data for top ten ranked schools withregards to API, EPI, & FPI Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 Improvement on ERG’s

SPI Measure ERG- IF’

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

ACTION STRATEGY PERSON

RESPONSIBLETIMELINE EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES TITLE I

COMPONENTUse online annual report for the 2011-2012school year Cindy Randle 2011-2012 Number of visits to site Local Budget

Increase EPI, API & SPI productivity Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 ERG Data Local Budget








SYSTEM

14


Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together



Use Blackboard connect system to contact parentsregarding campus activities

Kimberly Guinn, AmyFusco 2011-2012 Number of messages

sent & phones calledBB ConnectSystem

Use Creekview Home Page and Facebook Page tocommunicate with stakeholders

Meagan Gilbert,

Leah Waters,Kimberly Guinn 2011-2012 Survey Results Local Budget

Promote 100% teacher participation in PTSA &schedule PTSA meetings to coincide with otherschool events: Meet the Teacher, Registration,Mustang Roundup, etc.

Sherry Dunn, LeighHuseman 2011-2012 Survey Results


Performance Target: Employee: Campus Communication – School has system of communication that’s open, regular and honest



Schedule

Staff is informed of the district happeningsthrough faculty meetings, CIC, email, Joe LaPuma 2011-2012 Survey Local Budget








SYSTEM

15

ERG Performance Index 2010 Rank 2011Target 2011 Rank 2012

Target 2012 Rank

Education Productivity Index(EPI) 6 3 2

Academic Performance Index(API) 23 20 15

Staff Productivity Index (SPI) 36 25 20

Employee Opinion Survey 2011Result

2012Target

2012Result

Employee Job Satisfaction – I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.

84 90

Employee Campus Environment – I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.

70 80

Employee Curriculum and InstructionSupport – Teachers work amicably together on common problems.

82 85

Employee Campus Communication –School has system of communication that’s open, regular and honest.

68 80

AEIS 2011Result

2012Target

2012Result

Campus Rating AA Recognized

Student Attendance Rate95.9

(2008-2009)

96.5

Students with Disciplinary Placements 552(2008-09) 500

Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey) 2011Result

2012Target

2012Result

Very Satisfied or Satisfied with District Satisfied

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target








SYSTEM

16


READING/ELAREADING/ELA 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS % SATIS % COM % ADVTarget Result Target Result

Afr. American 96 98 22 25Hispanic 89 90 13 20White 98 99 27 30

Econ. Dis. 91 93 14 20LEP 53 65 1 10G/T 100 100 100 100Special Ed 85 90 11 20All Students 94 96 22 30

WRITINGWRITING 2011 2012 2011 2012


Afr. AmericanHispanicWhiteEcon. Dis.LEPG/TSpecial EdAll Students

SOCIAL STUDIESSOCIAL STUDIES 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS% SATIS

% COM% ADV

Target Result Target ResultAfr. American 96 98 59 65Hispanic 98 99 47 60White 99 100 77 80Econ. Dis. 98 99 50 60LEP 89 95 30 40G/T 100 100 100 100Special Ed 94 96 22 32All Students 98 99 63 73

MATHEMATICSMATHEMATICS 2011 2012 2011 2012


Afr. American 68 80 16 20Hispanic 73 80 16 20White 88 90 37 40

Econ. Dis. 73 85 18 20LEP 57 75 13 20G/T 100 100 100 100Special Ed 53 75 4 10All Students 80 85 28 35

SCIENCESCIENCE 2011 2012 2011 2012


Afr. American 88 90 19Hispanic 86 90 18White 95 96 45Econ. Dis. 86 90 19LEP 63 75 4G/T 99.3 100 100Special Ed 68 75 10All Students 90 93 32


SATISFACTORY ADVANCED# of Targets Met


Percent at Target








SYSTEM

17


C-FBISD COMPLETION RATEClass of 2009 Class of 2010 Class of 2011

Completion Rate CompRate

# ofDropouts

CompRate

# ofDropouts

Comp Rate DropoutsStudent Group Target Results Target Results

Afr. American 96.6 2 97.1 2 0 0

Hispanic 94.0 6 96.3 4 0 0

White 97.5 4 97.9 2 0 0

Econ. Dis. 96.84 96.9

4 00

G/T 0 0

Special Ed 0 0

All Students 96.8 12 97.5 9 0 0

Dropout Rate HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATEC-FBISD 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011Student Group Rate Rate Target Results

Afr. American 3.4 2.9

Hispanic 5.1 3.7

White 1.9 1.0

Econ. Dis. 3.2 3.1

G/T 0 0

Special Ed

All Students 1.9 2.0

RESULTS - 2012

PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETSCompletion Dropout

# of Targets Met


Percent at Target

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)C-FBISD Met AYP

2008 Met AYP

2009 Met AYP

2010 Met AYP2011 Did Not Meet AYP

Target 2012 Meet AYP

Results 2012








SYSTEM

18


C-FBISD SAT MEAN SCORES

Subtests 2009 2010 20112012

Target Results

Critical Reading 495 501 503 508

Mathematics 534 533 540 550

Writing 485 488 487 492

Combined Score 1513 1522 1530 1550

Percent (no)Tested

274 282 320 350

C-FBISD ACT MEAN SCORES

Subtests 2009 2010 2011 2012Target Results

English 20.3 20.7 22.1 23

Mathematics 22.8 22.6 23.9 25

Reading 21.6 22.3 22.7 23

Science 21.7 22.1 22.5 24

Composite 27.7 22.0 22.9 24

Percent Tested 132 137 127 150


SAT ACT

# of Targets Met# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

creekview - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

Documents