criteria for net zero initiative...welcome and intro –thomas hale presentations •alberto...
TRANSCRIPT
Bonus Session: Offsets Thursday May 20, 14:00 – 15:00 BST
AgendaWelcome and intro – Thomas HalePresentations
• Alberto Carrillo Pineda – CDP• Naomi Swickard – VERRA • Kelley Kizzier – Environmental Defense Fund• Derik Briekhoff – Stockholm Environment Institute
Questions and discussion
Criteria for Net Zero Initiative
Naomi SwickardChief Market Development Officer, VERRA
Criteria for Net Zero Initiative
Alberto Carrillo Pineda
Director, Science Based Targets
@acarrillopineda
May, 2020
The role of offsetting in science-based net-zero targets
Mitigation outcomes to reach net-zero emissions
2
Mitigation outcomes
Abatement of emissions
Conservation of biogenic carbon stocks
Negative emissions
Forest restoration
Reforestation
Afforestation
Soil carbon sequestration
BECCS
DACCS
Decarbonisation
Minimisation of non-CO2 emissions
Reduced deforestation and forest degradation
Forest management
Biological sequestration
Geological sequestration
Other forms of sequestration
Zero net-emissions by mid-century
Zero net-emissions within a decade
Substantial reduction of agricultural non-CO2
emissions despite rapid increase in agricultural output
*Indicators for limiting
warming to 1.5°C with
no or limited overshoot
Important role in the 2nd half of the
century to counterbalance the
impact of residual emissions and to
bring back CO2 concentrations to
safe levels
The list of mitigation measures hereby listed is non exhaustive and is included for illustrative purposes only
Components of corporate net-zero strategies
3
Components of corporate net-zero strategies
Abatement
Neutralisation
Compensation
Decarbonisation
Conservation of biogenic carbon stocks
Minimisation of non-CO2
emissions
Negative emissions
Avoided emissions through the use of sold products
Carbon finance
Mitigation outcome
occurs within the
value chain of the
company
Mitigation outcome
may occur within
or outside the
value chain of the
company
Compensation: Measurable climate
(mitigation) outcomes, resulting from
actions outside of the value-chain of a
company to compensate for the
impact that a company causes on the
climate.
Neutralisation: Effect of
counterbalancing the impact of
releasing greenhouse gases to the
atmosphere through appropriate GHG
emission removal measures.
Others
Mitigation outcome
occurs outside the
value chain of the
company
Abatement: Actions that companies
take to reduce their impact on the
climate by reducing greenhouse gas
emissions associated with their
operations and value chain.
What constitutes an effective neutralisation strategy?
4
• Permanence of
sequestration option;
• Risk of reversal;
• Leakage (Direct and
indirect);
• Volume and type of GHG
released;
• Atmospheric lifetime of
GHG
• Warming equivalence of
GHG emissions (e.g.
GWP*);
Shorter-term
storage
Longer-term
storage
Harvested wood
productsBiogenic sinks
Geological
sequestration
Type of forcer
being
neutralised
Short-lived
climate pollutant
(e.g. CH4, etc)
Long-lived
climate pollutant
(e.g. CO2, N2O)
Net-zero as a north star for mitigation (and compensation) strategies
5
• Compensation is not a substitute for abatement of emissions or
neutralisation;
• When considering sustainability constraints and associated risks,
neutralisation is hardly a substitute for abatement of emissions;
Net-zero as a north star for mitigation (and compensation) strategies
6
2050Base year
Neutralisation
of residual
emissions
2050Base year
Share of
compensation /
neutralisation in
mitigation
strategy
Residual
emissions
Share of
emissions
abatement in
mitigation
strategy
Companies are expected to reduce
emissions in line with 1.5°C / Paris-
aligned pathways and encouraged to
compensate unabated emissions to help
accelerate decarbonisation beyond their
boundaries
A transition towards effective neutralisation
measures (i.e. permanent carbon
sequestration) to mitigate residual
emissions is needed. Yet, this represents a
transition from the current practice, and this
transition needs to happen in a way that
maximises sustainability and climate
benefits along the journey
Compensation
of unabated
emissions
Unabated
emissions
Towards a common terminology and credible claims
7
Components of corporate net-zero strategies
Abatement
Neutralisation
Compensation
Decarbonisation
Conservation of biogenic carbon stocks
Minimisation of non-CO2
emissions
Negative emissions
Avoided emissions through the use of sold products
Carbon finance
Mitigation outcome
occurs within the
value chain of the
company
Mitigation outcome
may occur within
or outside the
value chain of the
company
Others
Mitigation outcome
occurs outside the
value chain of the
company
Ne
t-ze
ro / C
arb
on
Ne
utr
ali
ty
Cli
ma
te p
os
itiv
e?
Offsets in Net Zero
Kelley KizzierAssociate Vice President, International ClimateEDF
Offsets and Net Zero Obligations• Globally we need to transition to net-zero emissions
– In 2050, global net zero with residual emissions balanced by removals
• The path to 2050 - to get there we need to enhance emission reductions and removals
– Mismatch between mitigation opportunities and resources to mitigate
– An important role for countries and non-state actors with net zero commitments to support emissions reductions and removals by transferring resources to enhance and expedite the transition
• Urgent Reductions / Time Limited Opportunities– Tropical Forests
• Hard to Abate Sectors– Opportunity to leverage climate commitments from these to drive
emissions reductions in other areas
Total emissions reductions from in billion tonnes CO2e
Source: EDF
1. The global use of carbon markets could allow nearly doubling climate ambition at same cost,relative to current NDCs
Carbon markets can enable greater ambition
Net Result – Reductions or Removals• Is achieving a net zero target inconsistent with emission reduction offsets?
– Not if reductions (and removals) are additional– “Additionality” is fundamental for all carbon credits or “offets”
• A simple example – Entity A and Entity B emit 100 and 200 tonnes respectively– Entity A source their emission reductions from Entity B – provide for100 tonnes of
reduction – Net Result without support = 300 tonnes– Net Result with support = 200 tonnes– The credits are only “additional” if the reductions would not have happened in the
absence of the support.
• Also possible for global net zero - another simple example– Entities A, B and C, emit 100, 50 and 0 tonnes respectively– Entity A buys 50 tonnes of reductions from B, and 50 tonnes of removals from C– Net result = 0 emissions
• Reductions AND removals must be real, additional, verified and have measures to address permanence and leakage
Ensuring Robust Accounting
• Accounting of exported units/credits across countries is a key issue• Without robust accounting – NDCs / Net Zero commitments are
undermined• Also creates incentives to ensure that reductions and removals are
“real”
Source: OECD/IEA CCXG
Thank you!Kelley Kizzier
KEY TAKEAWAYS• We need all the tools in the box- need resources to
support reductions and removals• Although everyone offsetting is not consistent with net
zero, it does not mean that anyone offsetting is not consistent with net zero – it is a matter of striking the right balance within entities, between entities and over time
Carbon offsets: What role for net zero?
May 21, 2020
Derik Broekhoff
What is a carbon offset?
• An investment in external greenhouse gas reductions or removals in lieu of reducing one’s own carbon footprint
• Through offsetting, a claim to mitigation is transferred from one entity to another
• Most offset transactions are implemented through the issuance, transfer, and retirement of carbon credits, which convey a claim to certified mitigation
Offset “quality”
Is my offset…
…Not over-estimated?
…Additional?
…Permanent?
…Not harming anyone?
…Not double counted?
Or is it a product of bad accounting?
Or would an upgrade have happened anyway?
How many people are claiming the reductions from this project?
Or will someone be logging my offsets ten years from now?
Is this hydroelectric dam displacing people and destroying ecosystems?
www.offsetguide.org
Aren’t there standards for offsets?
• Offset “programs” were created to provide assurance and standardization for carbon credits• But at the end of the day, they have a binary decision to make:
• Quality, on the other hand, is not binary!• A program may issue credits for every reduction that scores above a
“50” for its level of confidence• But when you buy a credit, is a score of 51 really good enough?
Issue a credit Don’t issue a credit
Image source: Trexler 2019
Double counting
• Under the 2015 Paris Agreement, every country in the world has pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions• Currently, Article 6 negotiations are sorting out how to avoid
double counting when one country offsets its emissions with reductions from another• This is an issue for voluntary offsets, too!• Options:• Countries could formally acknowledge the transfer of an
offset to voluntary buyers• Think of voluntary “offsets” as something different: a
voluntary (charitable) contribution towards a country’s greenhouse gas reduction goals
Questions for “net zero”…
• Is “in lieu of” the right way to think about offsets in the context of net zero?
• If not…• Is one “offsetting” or “contributing to external mitigation”?• Why stop at net zero (why not “carbon negative”)?• Should offsets for net zero only involve removals?• Does one need a formal claim to the mitigation, and should
mitigation go beyond countries’ NDC pledges? • If an organization offsets all emissions, when does it get to
formally claim to be “net zero”?
A strawman proposal…
Endpoint (2050)…
• “Offsetting”
• Net zero
• Removals only (preferably geologic CCS)
• Avoidance of double counting strictly enforced
Interim period…
• “Contributions”
• Net zero or negative
• High quality avoided emissions + some removals
• Transparency on claims
Criteria for Net ZeroDiscussion & Questions
1. When is it appropriate to offset?
2. What offsets should be used (e.g. reductions vs removals, biological vs geological, permanence requirements)?
3. What rules/practices are needed for high-quality offsetting?
Criteria for Net ZeroNext Steps
1. Final session with Champions – Thursday 28 May (5pm BST)2. Output documents: “starting line” criteria and mapping 3. Process:
- Circulate for feedback via email/phone- Discuss as a group during final session- Revise based on inputs- Champions will publish final version