critical analysis
DESCRIPTION
Critical AnalysisTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Critical Analysis
![Page 2: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Aims of session
To explore the meaning of critical analysis
To develop critical thinking skills
To begin analysing a research-based article
![Page 3: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Critical analysis - what is it?
`In academic terms, critical analysis means considering the claims of theorists, governments, authorities and so on, what they are based on, and how far they seem to apply or be relevant to a given situation’. (Univ of Sussex Language Institute (1998) Critical Analysis, Argument and Opinion. [online] http://www.sussex.ac.uk/langc/skills/conc-det.html [Accessed 28.06.04]
![Page 4: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Bloom’s (1956) Hierarchy of Thinking SkillsEvaluate
(Make judgments about the value of ideas or information)
Synthesize(Combine ideas or information into something new)
Analyse(Make a systematic and detailed examination of an argument
or piece of research)
Apply(Use knowledge)
Comprehend(Have understanding)
Know(Be aware of something, recall information)
![Page 5: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Differences between descriptive and critical analytical writing
Descriptive writing Critical analytic writingStates what happened Identifies its significance
States what something is like
Evaluates strengths and weaknesses
Lists details Evaluates relative significance of details
States the order in which things happened
Makes reasoned judgments
Says how to do something Argues a case according to the evidence
![Page 6: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Differences between descriptive and critical analytical writingDescriptive writing Critical analytic writingExplains what a theory says Shows why something is
relevant or suitableNotes the method used Identifies whether it is
appropriate or usefulSays when something occurred
Identifies why the timing is important
States the different components
Weighs up the importance of different component parts
States options Gives reasons for selecting options
Source: Cottrell, S. (2003).The Study Skills Handbook. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p232.
![Page 7: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Doing a critical appraisal
What is the purpose of a critical appraisal?
A critical appraisal dissects the research paper, looking at its separate components
A critical appraisal comments on the paper as a whole
![Page 8: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What are the key components of an article based on primary research?
Abstract Introduction Literature review Research methods Data analysis/findings Discussion Conclusion
![Page 9: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Interrogating an article: a critiquing framework
The Introduction
Are the research aims/questions clearly stated?
Is there a clear rationale for the research?
Are key concepts clearly defined?
![Page 10: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Interrogating an article: the literature review
What is the present state of play in relation to the topic?
Are a range of up-to-date sources reviewed?
Are key themes in the literature discussed and their significance shown?
Are gaps in the literature identified?
![Page 11: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Interrogating an article: the research methods
Is the context of the research clear? Are the research methods appropriate to
the research questions)? Is there any evidence of triangulation? Are methods clearly justified? How is the research sample selected, and
is it an appropriate sample for the research questions?
Are the methods well executed? Are ethical issues addressed?
![Page 12: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Interrogating an article: the data analysis
Are the main findings described clearly? Are they clearly related to the original research
questions? Are they presented in a format that is appropriate
for the findings? Is the interpretation of the data consistent with
the evidence? Are the findings significant? If quantitative: Are the data analysed using
appropriate statistical tools? If qualitative: Selection of data presented?
Whose voice is dominant?
![Page 13: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Interrogating an article: the discussion
How are the data from the research related back to the literature and to other findings?
Does the research support or challenge existing thinking or practice?
Does the research suggest recommendations for practice, or areas for further research?
Is the author reflective on her/his work or self-critical?
![Page 14: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Interrogating an article: the conclusion
Are the threads of the argument drawn together clearly?
Are the research questions answered and research aims fulfilled?
What does the research contribute to the field?
![Page 15: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Interrogating an article: Overall evaluation
Strengths and weaknesses The article as a whole: structure and
argument What is its USP?
![Page 16: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Activity: Developing your skills
Preparing to write your review:In pairs: Use the critiquing framework
provided to analyse the article. Review 2 sections of the article Feedback to group
![Page 17: Critical Analysis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083019/577cc78c1a28aba711a148a0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Writing your review
Use the statements below to write a brief review of your article: The aims of this article are In her introduction, the author
claims that The literature review Her argument is She concludes that Whilst the author does