critical dialogue

Upload: omeraslan11

Post on 14-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    1/12

    Andrew WhiteEU and the Middle East

    6th March 2012

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    2/12

    Background

    Historical Overview

    Iran: Towards moderation The EU: A new foreign policy actor

    Security

    Economics Normative Concerns Conclusion Bibliography

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    3/12

    1957Treaty of Rome

    1979 Islamic Revolution

    1980 Start of Iran-Iraq War

    1986/87 Single European Act

    1988 End of Iran-Iraq War

    1989Fatwa against Rushdie (Feb)

    1989 Ayatollah Khomeini Dies (Jun)

    1989

    Rafsanjani becomes President 1991 Maastricht Treaty

    1992 Critical Dialogue announced

    1997 Mykonos Ruling (Apr)

    1997 Khatami becomes President

    Full name: Islamic Republic of Iran

    Population: 75.1 million (UN, 2010)

    Capital: Tehran

    Area: 1.65 million sq kmMajor language: Persian

    Major religion: Islam

    Life expectancy: 72(men), 75(women)

    Monetary unit: 10 rials = 1 toman

    Main exports: Petroleum, carpets,

    agricultural products

    GNI per capita: US $4,520

    Source: BBC

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    4/12

    Key Events: End of the Iran-Iraq War Death of Ayatollah Khomeini and the succession of Ali

    Khamenei to the seat of Supreme Leader. Election of Rafsanjani to the Presidency.

    Key Consequences: Move away from policy of exporting the IslamicRevolution

    Liberalisation of markets Green light for the EU to seek rapprochement with Iran

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    5/12

    Key Events: The Single European Act (1986)

    The Maastricht Treaty (1992)

    Key Consequences: Creation of the Common Foreign and Security

    Policy

    Enshrined founding principles and normativemanifesto

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    6/12

    Physical Security Assassinations on European soil

    Alleged support of IRA Arms proliferation

    Energy Security

    Policy towards MEPP/ anti-Israeli Stance Support of Hamas, Hezbollah

    Export of the Islamic Revolution

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    7/12

    Overview: $18.8 billion net trade in 1991 $25.2 billion net trade in 2006 (EUCE, 2008)

    Britain: Royal Dutch Shell invested $2.5 billion on Iran-Turkmenistan-Turkey-West Europe Pipeline

    France: Total (together with Gazprom and Petronas ) invested

    heavily in South Pars gas field in Iran

    Germany: Hermes-Credit-Guarantees DM150 million

    EU: $10 billion in loan refinancing to Iran between 1992 and 1997

    Source: Struwe (1998)

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    8/12

    To develop and consolidate democracy andthe rule of law, and respect for human rightsand fundamental freedoms. Art. J.1(2) TEU Oppression of the Bahais religious group

    Excessive use of the death penalty

    Subjugation of women

    The EU and soft power Use of economic incentives

    Multilateralism

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    9/12

    Security

    Terrorism, Iran stance on the MEPP, WMD

    proliferation, energy security Economic

    Resource rich nation (oil and gas), opportunities

    for development of emerging markets

    Normative

    Human rights, womens and minority rights,arbitrary justice, the rule of law

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    10/12

    The EU motivations in pursuing the CriticalDialogue with Iran in the between 1992 and

    1997 were threefold: Security

    Economic

    Normative The Critical Dialogue is the policy that arose

    from the convergence of EUs strategicinterests and normative values

  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    11/12

    Struwe, M. V. (1998), The policy of critical dialogue: An analysis ofEuropean human rights policy towards Iran from 1992 to 1997,Working Paper. University of Durham, Centre for Middle Eastern andIslamic Studies.

    Noi, A. . (2005), Irans nuclear programme: The EU approach to Iran incomparison to the US approach, Perceptions, Spring 2005

    Miller, R. (2012), The European Unions counterproductive Iran sanctions; thecase for pulling back, Foreign Affairs, 23.02.2012

    Posch, W. (2007), The European Union and Iran: What next?, TheInternational Spectator, 42:4, 537-543

    Commission of the European Communities (2001), EU relations with the IslamicRepublic of Iran COM(2001) 71 Final, 07.02.2001, Brussels

    Everts, S. (2004), Engaging Iran; A test case for EU foreign policy,

    Working Paper, Centre for European Reform, March 2004 Clawson, P. (1995), What to do about Iran?, Middle East Quarterly, 1995 2:4, 39-

    49 Edinburgh European Council 11-12 December 1992-

    http://wwweuroparl.europa.eu/summits/edinburgh/default_en.htm European Union Centre of North Carolina (EUCE), Europes Iran Diplomacy, EU

    Briefings, March 2008

    http://wwweuroparl.europa.eu/summits/edinburgh/default_en.htmhttp://wwweuroparl.europa.eu/summits/edinburgh/default_en.htmhttp://wwweuroparl.europa.eu/summits/edinburgh/default_en.htm
  • 7/27/2019 Critical Dialogue

    12/12

    The current move to impose an oil embargo onIranian oil exports to the EU represents a U-turn inEU policy from the Critical Dialogue. What

    factors can explain this development?

    Are sanctions an effective way of dealing withIran?