ctc 475 review evaluating alternatives evaluating alternatives ranking method (pw, aw, fw) ranking...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
233 views
TRANSCRIPT
CTC 475 Review CTC 475 Review
Evaluating alternativesEvaluating alternatives Ranking Method (PW, AW, FW)Ranking Method (PW, AW, FW) Incremental Method (PW, AW, FW, IRR, Incremental Method (PW, AW, FW, IRR,
ERR, SIR)ERR, SIR) Put alternatives in order of initial investmentPut alternatives in order of initial investment Determine cash difference of first 2 Determine cash difference of first 2
alternativesalternatives Determine whether incremental benefits Determine whether incremental benefits
outweigh incremental costsoutweigh incremental costs Compare winner to next alternativeCompare winner to next alternative
ObjectivesObjectives
Know why B/C ratio is usedKnow why B/C ratio is used Know how public projects differ from Know how public projects differ from
private sector projects private sector projects Know the pitfalls of using B/C ratioKnow the pitfalls of using B/C ratio
Public ProjectsPublic Projects
1.1. Cultural development (education, Cultural development (education, historic, recreation)historic, recreation)
2.2. Economic Services (transportation, Economic Services (transportation, power generation)power generation)
3.3. Natural Resources (pollution control, Natural Resources (pollution control, flood control, wildlife management)flood control, wildlife management)
4.4. Protection (military services, police, Protection (military services, police, fire)fire)
Differences from private sector Differences from private sector projectsprojects
Big initial costs (millions)Big initial costs (millions) Long lives (50, 100 years)Long lives (50, 100 years) Multiple-uses (lake might be used for Multiple-uses (lake might be used for
recreation, flood control, irrigation, recreation, flood control, irrigation, power generation)power generation)
Difficult to define cash flow ($ value Difficult to define cash flow ($ value on aesthetics?)on aesthetics?)
Public projectsPublic projects
Standard method for evaluation is Standard method for evaluation is the B/C ratiothe B/C ratio
Flood Control Act of 1936 – Benefits Flood Control Act of 1936 – Benefits must exceed costsmust exceed costs
B/C ratioB/C ratio
Benefits-Public benefits associated Benefits-Public benefits associated with the project with the project
Costs-Government costs associated Costs-Government costs associated with the projectwith the project
Disbenefits-Unfavorable consequences Disbenefits-Unfavorable consequences to the public associated with the to the public associated with the projectproject
B/C Ratio ExampleB/C Ratio Example
Alt.Alt. Initial Initial CostCost
Total Total Govt. Govt. AnnualizeAnnualized Costs d Costs (initial and O&M)(initial and O&M)
Total Public Total Public Annualized Annualized Costs Costs (accidents, (accidents, time of travel, time of travel, operating costs) operating costs)
Route ARoute A $417,000$417,000 $677,000$677,000 $16,973,000$16,973,000
Route BRoute B $1,023,00$1,023,0000
$1,243,00$1,243,0000
$13,605,000$13,605,000
Route CRoute C $1,734,00$1,734,0000
$2,103,00$2,103,0000
$12,678,000$12,678,000
B/C ratio?B/C ratio?
There are no defined benefits, so you There are no defined benefits, so you can’t directly determine B/C ratiocan’t directly determine B/C ratio
However, spending extra money However, spending extra money does lower total public costs does lower total public costs
Need to use incremental methodNeed to use incremental method
Compare B and A (B-A)Compare B and A (B-A)
Incremental Benefits:Incremental Benefits:$16,973,000-$13,605,000=$3,368,000 per year$16,973,000-$13,605,000=$3,368,000 per year
Incremental Costs: Incremental Costs: $1,243,000-$677,000=$566,000 per year$1,243,000-$677,000=$566,000 per year
B/C B/C (B-A)(B-A) = 5.95 (>1) = 5.95 (>1)
Prefer Route B over Route APrefer Route B over Route A
Compare C and B (C-B)Compare C and B (C-B)
Incremental Benefits:Incremental Benefits:$13,605,000-$1,678,000=$927,000 per year$13,605,000-$1,678,000=$927,000 per year
Incremental Costs: Incremental Costs: $2,103,000-$1,243,000=$860,000 per year$2,103,000-$1,243,000=$860,000 per year
B/C B/C (C-B)(C-B) = 1.08 (>1) = 1.08 (>1)
Prefer Route C over Route BPrefer Route C over Route B
Annual Worth MethodAnnual Worth Method
Alt.Alt. Total Total Govt. Govt. AnnualizeAnnualized Costs d Costs (initial and O&M)(initial and O&M)
Total Public Total Public Annualized Annualized Costs Costs (accidents, time of (accidents, time of travel operating travel operating costs) costs)
Total Costs Total Costs
Route ARoute A $677,000$677,000 $16,973,00$16,973,0000
$17,650,00$17,650,0000
Route BRoute B $1,243,0$1,243,00000
$13,605,00$13,605,0000
$14,848,00$14,848,0000
Route CRoute C $2,103,0$2,103,00000
$12,678,00$12,678,0000
$14,781,00$14,781,0000
ConsiderationsConsiderations
1.1. Point of viewPoint of view2.2. Selecting MARRSelecting MARR3.3. Assessing benefit-cost factorsAssessing benefit-cost factors4.4. OvercountingOvercounting5.5. Unequal livesUnequal lives6.6. Tolls & feesTolls & fees7.7. Multiple-Use ProjectsMultiple-Use Projects8.8. Problems with B/C ratioProblems with B/C ratio
1. Point of View1. Point of View
IndividualIndividual Particular government agencyParticular government agency Local areaLocal area Regional areaRegional area Entire nationEntire nation
2. Choosing MARR2. Choosing MARR
Public projects are funded by taxes, Public projects are funded by taxes, bonds, tolls. Making a profit is not bonds, tolls. Making a profit is not government’s motive:government’s motive:
Use zero?Use zero? Use rate paid by government for Use rate paid by government for
borrowed money?borrowed money? Use rate that private investors use?Use rate that private investors use?
3. Determining Benefit-Cost 3. Determining Benefit-Cost FactorsFactors
How far do you go in determining How far do you go in determining benefit-costs?benefit-costs?
Short-term benefits to local Short-term benefits to local economy?economy?
Secondary benefits?Secondary benefits? How do you put a price tag on How do you put a price tag on
aesthetics, wildlife, views, etc.?aesthetics, wildlife, views, etc.?
4. Overcounting4. Overcounting
Must be careful and not count twiceMust be careful and not count twice
Wages lost through disability Wages lost through disability Company’s cost of disability Company’s cost of disability
insuranceinsurance
5. Unequal Lives5. Unequal Lives
How do you calculate salvage values How do you calculate salvage values for public works projects?for public works projects?
6. Tolls, Fees and User Charges6. Tolls, Fees and User Charges
Tolls and user fees effect B/C ratio, Tolls and user fees effect B/C ratio, but not necessarily B-C but not necessarily B-C
Example:Example:
EUAC=$20,000 for public facilityEUAC=$20,000 for public facility 10,000 people per year attend facility10,000 people per year attend facility Person receives $3 of benefits per Person receives $3 of benefits per
eventevent
Without User FeeWithout User Fee
B/C=($3*10,000)/$20,000=1.5B/C=($3*10,000)/$20,000=1.5 B-C=$30,000-$20,000=$10,000 per B-C=$30,000-$20,000=$10,000 per
yearyear
With User FeeWith User Fee
Fee of $1.50 is chargedFee of $1.50 is charged Net benefits are only $1.50Net benefits are only $1.50 Govt. Cost is reduced by $15,000 Govt. Cost is reduced by $15,000 Govt. Cost is $5,000 per yearGovt. Cost is $5,000 per year
B/C=($1.5*10,000)/$5,000=3B/C=($1.5*10,000)/$5,000=3 B-C=$15,000-$5,000=$10,000 per B-C=$15,000-$5,000=$10,000 per
yearyear
7. Multiple-Use Project7. Multiple-Use Project
For incremental costs you can For incremental costs you can sometimes expand a public project to sometimes expand a public project to provide multiple benefits provide multiple benefits
ExampleExample
ProjectProject PW Costs PW Costs (millions)(millions)
PW PW Benefits Benefits (millions)(millions)
B/C ratioB/C ratio
Dam& Res. For Dam& Res. For IrrigationIrrigation
$14.5$14.5 $25$25 1.721.72
Dam & Res. Dam & Res. For Flood For Flood ControlControl
$9$9 $6$6 0.670.67
Dam & Dam & Reservoir for Reservoir for Irrigation & Irrigation & Flood ControlFlood Control
$18.5$18.5 $31$31 1.681.68
Use incremental analysis to Evaluate Use incremental analysis to Evaluate Dam for Irrigation Only versus Dam for Dam for Irrigation Only versus Dam for
Irrigation & Flood ControlIrrigation & Flood Control
Incremental benefits 31-25=6Incremental benefits 31-25=6 Incremental costs = 18.5-14.5=4Incremental costs = 18.5-14.5=4 Incremental B/C ratio = 1.5Incremental B/C ratio = 1.5
>1 means that it’s worth spending >1 means that it’s worth spending the extra money to derive both the extra money to derive both benefitsbenefits
Problems with B/CProblems with B/C
Don’t make the mistake of ranking Don’t make the mistake of ranking B/C ratiosB/C ratios
In previous example, ranking would In previous example, ranking would have given us the wrong answer (see have given us the wrong answer (see next slide)next slide)
ExampleExample
ProjectProject PW PW CostsCosts
PW PW Ben. Ben.
B/C B/C ratioratio
B-CB-C
Dam& Res. For Dam& Res. For IrrigationIrrigation
$14.5$14.5 $25$25 1.721.72 $10.5$10.5
Dam & Res. Dam & Res. For Flood For Flood ControlControl
$9$9 $6$6 0.670.67 -$3-$3
Dam & Dam & Reservoir for Reservoir for Irrigation & Irrigation & Flood ControlFlood Control
$18.5$18.5 $31$31 1.681.68 $12.5$12.5
Other Problems with B/C Ratio Other Problems with B/C Ratio
Benefits/Costs must be determined Benefits/Costs must be determined objectivelyobjectively
Don’t play games to get the result Don’t play games to get the result you wantyou want
Other types of AnalysisOther types of Analysis
Sometimes you can’t measure a Sometimes you can’t measure a project in terms of $ aloneproject in terms of $ alone
Reliability, performance, availability, Reliability, performance, availability, maintainability may be importantmaintainability may be important
Defense and space systems may use Defense and space systems may use other methods than consideration of other methods than consideration of costs alonecosts alone