cue-based feeding: getting past “but we’ve …fannp.purehost.com/fannppdf14/a03b cue-based...
TRANSCRIPT
Cue-Based Feeding: Getting Past “But We’ve Always Done it This Way!” Jamie Fletcher-Hicks, MSN, APRN, NNP-BC Neonatal Nurse Practitioner University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
The speaker has signed a disclosure form and indicated she has no significant financial interest or relationship with the companies or the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product and/or service that will be discussed as part of this presentation.
Session Summary
Recent evidence contradicts our decades-long feeding practices, but how do we depart from what we have always thought to be true? This presentation shows the evidence for cue-based feeding and illustrates the journey taken by one NICU that successfully transformed its culture.
Session Objectives
Upon completion of this presentation, the participant will be able to:
compare traditional medical model and cue-based feeding model;
examine the evidence for cue-based feeding;
describe the University of Virginia NICU’s transition to cue-based feeding, including what worked and what didn’t.
References
Bingham, P., Ashikaga, T. & Abbasi, S. (2010). Prospective study of non-nutritive sucking and feeding skills in premature infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood, Fetal Neonatal Edition, 95(3): F 194-200.
Kirk, A., Alder, S. & King, J. (2007). Cue-based oral feeding clinical pathway results in earlier attainment of full oral feeding in premature infants. Journal of Perinatology, 27: 572-578.
Ludwig, S. & Waitzman, K. (2007). Changing feeding documentation to reflect infant-driven feeding practice. Newborn & Infant Nursing Reviews, 7(3): 155-160.
McCain, G. (2003). An evidence based guideline for introducing oral feeding to healthy preterm infants. Neonatal Network, 22: 45-50.
McCormick, F., Tosh, K., McGuire, W. (2010). Ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding versus scheduled interval feeding for preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005255. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005255.pub3.
McGrath,J. & Bodea Braescu, A. (2004). Feeding readiness in the preterm infant. Journal of Perinatal-Neonatal Nursing, 18: 353-368.
Pickler, R., Best, A., Reyna, B., Gutcher, G. & Wetzel, P. (2006). Predictors of nutritive suckling in preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology, 26: 693-699.
A3b FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 1 of 10
Puckett, B., Grover, V., Holt, T. & Sankaran, K. (2008). Cue-based feeding for preterm infants: A prospective trial. Journal of Perinatology, 25: 623-628.
Shaker, C. (2013). Cue-based feeding in the NICU: Using the infant's communication as a guide. Neonatal Network, 32(6): 404-8.
Thomas, J. (2007). Guidelines for bottle feeding your premature baby. Advances in Neonatal Care,7(6): 311-318.
Session Outline
See presentation handout on the following pages.
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 2 of 10
Cue-Based Feeding: Getting Past “But We’ve Always Done It
This Way!”
Jamie Fletcher Hicks, RN, MSN, NNP-BCNeonatal Nurse Practitioner
University of Virginia Health SystemNeonatal Intensive Care Unit
“I can feed a ROCK!”
“I can feed a ROCK!”• Compare traditional medical model and cue-based
feeding model
• Examine the evidence for cue-based feeding
Objectives:
g
• Describe the University of Virginia NICU’s transition to cue-based feeding, including what worked, what didn’t
The Traditional Medical Model The Traditional Medical Model
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 3 of 10
• Medical team orders volume/caloric density• Typically ~120kcal/kg/day• Nurse administers feeding by mouth, gavage, or a
combination or the twoV l d i l
The Traditional Medical Model
Volume-driven culture
• “Better nurses”—coax volume into babies
• “Poor feeders”—babies who don’t take volume prescribed volumes
The Traditional Medical Model: Attitudes
• “The light bulb turned on” • (Shaker, 2013)
• Nurses might say:
• “If I can just get him to take these last 5mL…”
The Traditional Medical Model: Attitudes
• Nurses less likely to say:
• “We had a positive feeding experience,he woke up, showed cues, no aversive behaviors.”
• RN documentation=volume NG vs. volume PO
• Little documentation of to how the baby fed
The Traditional Medical Model: Attitudes
• NNPs/MDs--we like quantitative measurements:
• Total fluids in mL/kg/day• Output in mLs/kg/hour• Weight gain in grams
(Thomas, 2007)
Oral Feeding: It’s Not That Simple!
• Oral feeding involves 5 subsystems:
• AutonomicMotorStateBehavioralSelf-Regulatory
Als’ Synactive Theory of Development
• Not just time for maturity, but caregiver/baby reciprocity
• Caregiver must recognize feeding cues and disengagement cues
(Thomas, 2007)
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 4 of 10
Caregiver recognizes/responds to:
Rooting, sucking on hands, alert quiet state
Als’ Synactive Theory of Development
Just as important to pay attention to subtle “stop” signs:
Hiccupping, fanning fingers, gaze aversion, worried expression, yawning, looking exhausted
Als’ Synactive Theory of Development
• Caregiver should recognize physiological “stop” signs:
• Apnea, bradycardia, desaturations
Als’ Synactive Theory of Development:
• If not, can lead to oral aversion
Cue-Based Feeding: The Evidence
• Two prospective trials:– Kirk, Alder, & King, 2007:
• Full PO feedings 6 days sooner
– McCain 2003:
Cue-Based Feeding: The Evidence
– McCain, 2003:
• Full PO feedings 5 days sooner
• Preparing for PO feeding: Non-nutritive suck– Bingham et al, 2010: NNS=better organization and earlier transition to
full PO feeds, average of 3 days earlier
Cue-Based Feeding: The Evidence
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 5 of 10
What does Cochrane say?
• 8 RCTs
Cue-Based Feeding: The Evidence
• 3 trials showed 2-4 days earlier to PO feedings
• Trials were small, poorly designed• Inconclusive• Need a large RCT
(McCormick, Tosh, & McGuire, 2010)
• Is developmentally appropriate
• Decrease LOS/Healthcare costs
Cue-Based Feeding: The Benefits
• Can improve parent satisfaction
“But we’ve always done it this way!”
Despite the Evidence, Change is Difficult!
You can’t start soda soon enough!
Do your child a favor!
They will fit in better during those
The way things used to be…..
They will fit in better during thoseawkward preteen years!
A strict regimen of sodas and other sugary, carbonated beverages right now for a lifetime of guaranteed happiness!!
Laboratory tests have proven this!
• Some reasons for resistance are valid, others not
• Most experienced nurses—were in support of not “feeding a rock.”
Despite the Evidence, Change is Difficult!
• ”I have a 3 or 4 baby assignment and have to keep a schedule.”—Interruption of workflow
• NPs and physicians—uncomfortable with what we can’t measure and less than 120kcal/kg/day
• Champions—to get buy in• Who??
• Nurses
Making The Change: Step 1
• Physicians• Speech Therapists• Physical Therapists• Occupational Therapists• Dietitians• Parents
• Anyone could be a champion!
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 6 of 10
Making The Change: Algorithm and Guidelines
• Begin with non-nutritive suck
• How early for PO feedings??
Making The Change: The Guidelines
• Is the baby showing cues? 30 weeks CGA or greater? On nasal cannula or room air? Then offer a PO feeding!
• Begins with Milestone One: 1 PO feeding/shift, progresses through Milestone Four, all PO feedings
• 75% of feeding, no need to gavage feed• Guidelines for breastfeeding, too• Can directly breastfeed and NOT know the volume (gasp!!)
Making The Change: The Guidelines
Ca d ect y b east eed a d O o t e o u e (gasp )• Measure growth/weight gain, not mLs or kcals• Champions sought approval of algorithm/guidelines
***Quality--not quantity--of PO feedings as a measure of success***
Making The Change: Documentation
Changes made to EMR for NNPs/MDs to order Cue-Based FeedingNurses now documenting qualitative assessment of feeding
• Extensive!• Many formats• Over 9 months• Small group mini-lectures for RNs
Making The Change: Education
• Lectures for residents at morning rounds• Captive audience—at RN staff meetings• Friday Footnotes-bi-weekly email• Quizzes with prizes—who doesn’t love a coffee card??• Shadow box• NICU Core Curriculum—newly hired RNs
Making The Change: Education--Shadow Box
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 7 of 10
• Educate parents • Ideally, they do the feeding
Education: Don’t Forget Mom and Dad
• Can we go from Milestone #1 to Milestone #2? My patient showed cues every feeding. Too bad I had to use the NG tube!
Along The Way:
• Feed the baby! Infant-driven model. • Guidelines are to guide.
• What if the baby is showing cues more than every 3 hours?
• Feed the baby!
• What if the baby is showing cues less often than every 3 hours?
• Feed the baby! But use NGT if >3.5 hours and
Questions Along The Way:
yno hunger cues.
Guideline—not policy.
Not substitute for clinical judgment.
Not set in stone.
Questions Along The Way:
My patient PO fed 75% of his breastmilk feeding. I can’t refrigerate the rest. You want me to DISCARD the remainder of the liquid gold?
Questions Along The Way:My patient PO fed 75% of his breastmilk feeding. You want me to DISCARD the remainder of the liquid gold?• Probably. Consider this:• 1.8kg baby
Questions Along The Way:
g y• Receiving 24kcal breastmilk• 150mL/kg/day• 34mL q 3 hours, if baby fed 25mL (75%), only 9mL
would be discarded• Allows baby to feel hunger• Maybe sooner to reach full PO feed/discharge sooner• Mom not low supply or terribly upset
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 8 of 10
• What did all of those champions do?? Many jobs…..
• Developing algorithm
• Approval of Division of Neonatology
What Worked?
• Approval of Nursing Clinical Practice Committee
• Education
• Developing order sets and documentation through EMR
• Pre-intervention data collection
• Post-intervention data collection
• Remember this? Instead of this at bedside…..
What Worked?
• ….We used these:
What Worked?—Bedside Flip Cards
• ….We used these:
What Worked?—Bedside Flip Cards
• ….We used these:
What Worked?—Bedside Flip Cards
• ….We used these:
What Worked?—Bedside Flip Cards
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 9 of 10
• More frequent feedings sometimes unrealistic
• The exception was breastfeeding! This worked really, really well.
What Did And Did Not Work?
y
• Several other changes—too much at once?? • LOS Reduction Taskforce:• Thermoregulation protocol• Oxygen weaning protocol
What Did Not Work?
• Increase in documentation• Recent change to EMR from paper charting
• Goal: to reach full PO feedings by 36 0/7 weeks• Excluded NEC, Grade IV IVH, or VP shunt
• Pre-intervention data
Outcomes
• Post intervention data
FANNP 25TH NATIONAL NNP SYMPOSIUM: CLINICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
A3b: CUE-BASED FEEDING: GETTING PAST "BUT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY!" Page 10 of 10