cultural influences in anticorruption training
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
1/42
Cultural Nuances in GlobalAnti-Corruption Training
18 October 2012
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
2/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Agenda
Introduction Bribery and Anti-Corruption Anti-Corruption Training Cultural Issues in Corruption Cultural Complications in Training Tools for Evaluating Culture Steps to Intercultural Competency in Training (and Beyond)
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
3/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
About SAI Globalwww.saiglobal.com/compliance
Partnering with clients to build organizational integrity by integrating ethics andcompliance, understanding and controlling risk, and enabling good governance
3 fully staffed offices around the world
Americas: Plainsboro NJ, Houston TX and Waltham MA
EU countries: 2 UK locations AsiaPacific: 3 Australian locations
> 500 clients including 40% of the Fortune 100 and 30% of the Fortune 500
Fully hosted, highly scalable technology: case/issue management, Registry,risk management, GRC
Learning & communication: training, awareness, certifications, disclosures,surveys, Code of Conduct, hotline
All supported by in-house advisory services; adult learning and technologyintegration specialists
Programs across 120 countries and over 45 languages
2011 SAI Global Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.saiglobal.com/compliancehttp://www.saiglobal.com/compliance -
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
4/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Biography
Ethics and Compliance Consultant for SAI Global Written practitioner and academic articles on culture, decision
making, and ethics. PhD. candidate at University of Southampton (England) in
Business Ethics; dissertation focuses on how firm culture isrelated to ethical decision making.
Previously, Director at iGate (Based in India with a 90% Indianworkforce)
Extensive international business experience as a businessstrategy consultant for Accenture, including:
India China Australia UK Scandinavia
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
5/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Why countering bribery matters
More than 1 Trillion Dollars are paid in bribes globally each year.(Word Bank) $1 out of every $30 is being spent on bribes, often in the countries
that can least afford the diversion of resources. (TransparencyInternational)
Bribery is estimated to raise the cost of living in some countries15% or more (Transparency International)
"Each time a company pays a briber it is contributing, even in asmall way, to perpetuating a system of corruption that embedspoverty and inequality. Stopping this supply-side bribery is vital if
the fight against corruption is to be successful." Chandu Krishnan While much bribery happens in the developing countries, many of
the recent bribery scandals have taken place in developedcountries.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
6/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
The legal framework to combat supply-side corruption
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
7/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Enforcement Trends
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
8/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act U.S. Law, enacted 1977 Anti-bribery and Books & Records provisions Enforced by DOJ and SEC
Bribery Act 2010 UK law, enforced as of July 1, 2011 Enforced by Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
Most other countries have anti-bribery legislation Enforced to varying degrees Enforcement leaders are Germany, Norway,
Switzerland, US
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development The OECD Convention requires signatory countries tocriminalize the bribery of foreign officials.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
9/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
The laws are complicated and continuously evolving US companies operating globally are subject to the laws of other
countries Bribery and corruption enforcement activity continues to increase
in volume and sophistication The penalties for violations are potentially enormous Companies are responsible for the actions of associated third
parties Personal liability exists for executives Corruption scandals make headlines and can ruin companies and
individuals
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
10/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
Risk Exposure
CorporationJoint Ventures Agents/Partners
SuppliersCustomers
Bribery andcorruptionrisks (andliabilities)exist beyondyour
corporateboundaries
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
11/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
Penalties imposed upon violators can include fines, investigation, outside legalfees, disgorgement, potential debarment and the possibility of prosecutions inmultiple countries
Additional onerous and costly repercussions can include the imposition ofmonitors, audits, mandated reporting, and bolstered compliance programs
Company Penalties Other AssociatedCosts*
Siemens AG $1.6B $1B
KBR/Halliburton $579M Not Disclosed
BAE Systems $400M Not Disclosed
Weatherford Pending $106M
Baker Hughes $44M $50M
Daimler $185M >$500M* Associated costs are conservative asthey only reflect disclosed amounts
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
12/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
13/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
Source: 2010 FCPA Update, Gibson Dunn
2010 witnessed an 85% increase in enforcement actions over 2009, which wasalso a record year 8 of the top 10 monetary settlements in FCPA history were reached in 2010
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
14/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
UK Bribery Act 2010 in force and includesnew bribery offenses, setting stage forfuture enforcements
German authorities more vigorouslyprosecuting bribery cases since Siemenssettlement
Transparency International laudsGermany, Norway, Switzerland, and USas active enforcers of OECD
Convention Australian Federal Police currently
investigating allegations of bribery bySecurency International
2010-Lanny Breuer announces thatDOJ is currently hiring additionalprosecutors in the Fraud Unit tohandle FCPA Cases
FBI has dedicated FCPA agents SEC expanding FCPA focus; creates
FCPA unit in 2009 and opens newoffice in San Francisco in 2010
Number of individuals prosecuted forFCPA was 44 in 2009, up from 9 in2008
OECD pledges to monitor anti-corruption commitment andenforcement by signatory countries
The Enforcement Trend is Likely To Continue
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
15/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Bribery and Corruption: Why the Concern?
Additional Enforcement Techniques and Theories Are Being Utilized
Increased cooperation between US Department of Justice and othergovernments, including use of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) tofacilitate assistance
Increased effort to pursue foreign third parties, including foreign officials,involved in bribery
FBI now using traditional criminal law enforcement techniques such aswiretapping, surveillance, informants and undercover sting operations fordetecting and prosecuting bribery
DOJ enforcement strategy increasingly includes prosecution of individuals tohold them accountable and gain leverage over corporations
Use of Travel Act to criminalize commercial bribery, making all bribery ofconcern to US companies
No Double Jeopardy
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
16/42Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
FCPA UK Bribery Act 2010
Jurisdiction
Corporations registered in the U.S. (issuers), domesticconcerns (individuals and corporations), and non-U.S.registered foreign companies under certain circumstances
Applies to employees and agents
British nationals and corporationsCommercial organizations which have a business presencein the UK*
Applies to associated persons
ProhibitionsBribery of foreign officialsDeceptive books and records
Paying or receiving commercial bribes *Bribery of foreign officialsFailure to prevent bribery *
Defenses &Exceptions
Facilitating payments (exception)Payment lawful under written laws of foreign country(defense)Bona fide expenditure related to the promotion of products orservices or performance of a contract (defense)Corrupt intent required
Company had adequate procedures in place to preventbribes *No exception or defense for facilitating payments *No exception or defense for bona fide expenditures * No corrupt intent required *
Penalties
Criminal penalties up to $2,000,000 and five yearsimprisonment per violation
Add'l penalties may be levied under other laws Civil fines, debarment, disgorgement, private actions alsolikely
Criminal Statute onlyUp to 10 years in prisonUnlimited fines *Mandatory debarment under UK Public Contracts Regulation2006**
EnforcingAuthority
Department of Justice (DOJ) - criminalSecurities Exchange Commission (SEC) - civil
UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
Of Interest
Books and Records provision greatly expands jurisdictionand penaltiesEffective ethics and compliance programs can lowerculpability score under Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Draft Guidance has been released for comment Act in force as of July 1, 2011. Not retroactive.
*Different from FCPA**Not written in Act, but appears possible
The Regulations : FCPA & UK Bribery Act Details
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
17/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to Me?
Components of an Effective Program-USSG & Recent DPAs
Risk assessment Clear anti-corruption culture supported by board & senior officers Regular reporting to Board on anti-bribery and corruption initiatives
Code of Conduct and relevant written policies prohibiting bribery Clear procedures for hiring and conducting due diligence on 3 rd
parties (background investigations) Ongoing assessments of 3 rd party risk Training & communication plans for employees and third parties
Appropriate and consistent disciplinary procedures Well advertised hotline and strong anti-retaliation policies Rapid and thorough investigation capabilities
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
18/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to me?
Types of Organizations at Most Risk
Any global company that has a significant distribution channel, usesa significant number of agents or engages in joint ventures
Oil, Gas and Energy (extractives)
Pharmaceutical, Medical Device and Healthcare High Tech and Telecommunications (newest target) Aerospace and Defense Chemicals Conglomerates
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
19/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to me?
Countries with Most Risk (Transparency International)
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
20/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to me?
Risk Posed to Corporations & Executives
Significant corporate fines Reputational loss & front page headlines Diversion from business
Personal liability (fines and/or prison) to senior management, boardmembers and anyone involved in the act of bribery
Dealing with monitor, management of Corporate Integrity Agreement, etc.
Career derailment
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
21/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to Me?
Factors Increasing Bribery and Corruption Risk
Industries relying upon government customers, contract work orgovernment approval
Use of 3 rd parties, particularly in certain geographic regions
Reliance upon 3rd
parties to interact with government officials Inconsistent hiring and due diligence procedures (background
investigations) Unclear gift policies and use of petty cash Weak auditing function, or audits not directed towards this risk area Lack of management commitment to ethical standards (eg. lack of
discipline for violations, or pressure to make sales at any cost) Lack of training, communication, and awareness of policies Lack of Ethics and Compliance resources Culture of retaliation against whistleblowers
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
22/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to Me?
Common Third Party-Related Red Flags (Non-Exhaustive)
The country where the transaction is taking place has a history of corruption, bribery or FCPAviolations.
The partner, consultant or agent was specifically recommended by a foreign official.
You are not clear or are suspicious about the reputation of a partner, agent or consultantbecause they are not forthcoming with information.
The partner, consultant or agent will be interfacing with governmental officials
The requested method of payment is unusual for a business transaction, or cash is requested.For example, the partner, consultant or agent requires that payment be made to a third partyor in some other country.
The partner, consultant or agent seems unqualified or lacks the resources to perform theservices offered. The only qualification the representative has is influence over foreignofficials.
The partner, consultant or agent has undisclosed principals, associates or subcontractor withwhom fees or commissions are split.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
23/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to Me?
Practical Advice
You cannot help your firm or yourself by participating in prohibitedbehavior
Seek assistance from Legal or Compliance with questions andbefore taking any actions
Do not turn a blind eye to suspicious behavior or circumstances Pay attention to employees potentially exposed to corruption risk Always ensure third parties are properly vetted and remain
compliant Ensure your employees are trained and understand firm policies
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
24/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
What Does it Mean to Me?
Practical Advice, cont .
Encourage employees to report suspected wrongdoing Be careful with Gifts & Hospitality expenses.
Avoid facilitation payments Pay particular attention to all dealings with foreigngovernments (including government-owned businesses)
Help incorporate anti-bribery initiatives into standardbusiness processes
Help promulgate tone from the top
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
25/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Integrity has become a larger issue
Increased scrutiny by governments New legislation like Dodd-Frank, UK Bribery Act, etc
Stakeholder demand for transparency Fines and criminal prosecutions have reputational,
management and financial impact Client and business partner requirement for partnerships
based on integrity Global reach of companies increases span of risk No one wants to be associated with an organization
that isnt ethical Walking the walk and not talking the talk is more than an
oft-repeated phrase, but an expected part of whatorganizations do
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
26/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Finding & fixing problems has become more difficultdue to both the volume & the complexity
OECD
NACD
SEC
NYSErules
SOX
NASDAQrules
Employment & Labor
AS 3806
FSG
Thompson Memo
TIAACREFF
PCAOB
ISO9000ERM
AS 4360Baldridge
EuropeanQuality
CSRGRI
SA 8000ISO14000Quality
Legal Compliance
Prosecutorial Guidance
Wage &Hour
WorkplaceViolence
FDA
AS 4269
Government Contracts
Anti-Harassment
ContingentWorkforce
Hiring & Retention
HIPAA
Employee Information
GLBA
ISO 17709
COBIT
NIST
Whistleblowing
Turnbull
AFL-CIO
FFIEC
WebTrustSysTrust
COCO
CMM
FCPA
OFEHO
HumanCapital CMM
CISA
HHS Guidance
IIAGuidance EPA AML
Antitrust
Anti-Fraud
USA
PATRIOT
IRS & Tax CompetitivePractices
CCGG
SAS 94
Global Markets &Jurisdictions
Outsourcing &Extended Enterprise
M&A
National, State/Provincial &Local Jurisdictions
Used with permission of Corporate Integrity, LLC
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
27/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Whats the same and whats different
Size of an organization Industry Global reach Specific regulations Culture of the organization Culture of the industry Regional/country culture
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
28/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Culture is what is assumed
Greetings: U.S: One handed handshake Japan: Bowing and accepting a handshake. Egypt: Kiss on both cheeks (depending on relationship)
Gifts Japan: Exchanging gifts symbolizes the depth and
strength of a business relationship to the Japanese andare usually exchanged at the first meeting. One isexpected to be prepared to reciprocate.
Germany: Giving gifts is considered inappropriate. Muslim nations: No gifts of food during Ramadan. China: Gifts are given upon leaving. Giving a gift of a
clock is bad luck.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
29/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Culture is hard to talk about
Its nearly impossible to talkintelligently about corporateculture.
Culture means different thingsat different levels of analysis.
You only notice it when itsdifferent from your own/whensomeone makes a mistake.
Speci c to the individual Inherited and learned
Speci c to group or category Learned
Universal Inherited
Personality
Culture
Human Nature
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
30/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Layers of Social Abstraction
Individual team functional organizational social identity
groupnational/ societal
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
31/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Hofstedes Dimensions of Culture
Hofstede (1997) has postulated five different work-related valueswhich characterize different cultures around the globe - Power distance index (PDI): Power distance is the extent to
which the less powerful members of organizations and institutions(like the family) accept and expect that power is distributed
unequally. Individualism (IDV) vs. collectivism: The degree to whichindividuals are integrated into groups.
Masculinity (MAS), vs. femininity: The distribution of emotionalroles between the genders.
Uncertainty avoidance index (UAI): a society's tolerance foruncertainty and ambiguity. Long term orientation (LTO), vs. short term orientation: First called
Confucian dynamism, it describes societies time horizon.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
32/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Dimensions of Culture: U.S.A.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
33/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Dimensions of Culture: Brazil
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
34/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Dimensions of Culture: China
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
35/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Dimensions of Culture: India
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
36/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
GLOBE Cluster Analysis
N o r d i c An g l o
G e r m a n i c
L a
t i n
E u r o p e a
n
A f r i c a n
E a s t e r n E u
r o p e a n
M i d d l e E a s t e r n
C o n f u c i a n
S o u
t h e a s t
A s i a n
L a t i n
A m e
r i c a n
Ph
ilip
p ines
Indo
n e s ia
M a l a
y sia
India
Th
ail
a nd
Iran
E c u a d o
r
E l S a l v a
d o r
C o l u m
b i a
B o l i v i
a
B r a z i l
G u a t
e m a l a
A r g e n t i n a
C o s t a R i c a
V e n e z
u e l a
M e x i c o
D e n m a r k
F i n l a n d
S w e d e n
C a n a d a U .S .A.Au s t r a l i a I r e l a n d E n g l a n d S o u t h Af r i c a ( W h i t e S a m p l e ) N e w Z e a l a n d
A u s t r i a
T h e N e t h e r l a n d s
S w i t z e r l a n d
( G e r m a n S p e a k i n g )
G e r m a n y
I s r a e l
I t a
l y
S w
i t z e r l a n
d
( F r e n c h
S p e a
k i n g )
S p a
i n
P o r t u g a
l
F r a n c e
Z i m b a b w e
N a m i b i a
Z a m b i a
N i g e r i a
S o u t h
A f r i c a
( B l a c k
S a m p l e )
G r e e c e
H u n g a r y
A l b a n i a
S l o v e n i a
P o l a n d
R u s s i a
G e o r g i a
K a z a k h s t a
n
T u r k e y K u w a i t E g y p t M o r o c c o Q a t a r
S i n g a p o r e
H o n g K o n g
T a i w a n
C h i n a
S o u t h K o r e a
J a p a n
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
37/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Power distance andcorruption
An example of using publicdomain data to predictcorruption risk.
Transparency InternationalCorruption Perception Index,2010
Hofstede 2008
20 40 60 80
2
4
6
8
pdi
i n d e x
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
38/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Appendix A: Other Models of Culture
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
39/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Fons Trompenaars Dimensions of culture
Universalism versus particularism
Universalism: People place a high importance on laws, rules, values, andobligations. They try to deal fairly with people based on these rules, but rules comebefore relationships.
Particularism: People believe that each circumstance, and each relationship,dictates the rules that they live by. Their response to a situation may change, basedon what's happening in the moment, and who's involved.
Individualism versus communitarianism Individualism: People believe in personal freedom and achievement. They believe
that you make your own decisions, and that you must take care of yourself. Communitarianism: People believe that the group is more important than the
individual. The group provides help and safety, in exchange for loyalty. The groupalways comes before the individual.
Specific versus diffuse Specific: People keep work and personal lives separate. As a result, they believe
that relationships don't have much of an impact on work objectives, and, althoughgood relationships are important, they believe that people can work togetherwithout having a good relationship.
Diffuse: People see an overlap between their work and personal life. They believethat good relationships are vital to meeting business objectives, and that theirrelationships with others will be the same, whether they are at work or meetingsocially. People spend time outside work hours with colleagues and clients.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
40/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
Fons Trompenaars Dimensions of culture Neutral versus emotional
Neutral: People make a great effort to control their emotions. Reason influences
their actions far more than their feelings. People don't reveal what they're thinkingor how they're feeling. People want to find ways to express their emotions, even spontaneously, at work.
In these cultures, it's welcome and accepted to show emotion. Achievement versus ascription
Achievement: People believe that you are what you do, and they base your worthaccordingly. These cultures value performance, no matter who you are.
Ascription: People believe that you should be valued for who you are. Power, title,and position matter in these cultures, and these roles define behavior.
Sequential time versus synchronous time Sequential: People like events to happen in order. They place a high value on
punctuality, planning (and sticking to your plans), and staying on schedule. In thisculture, "time is money," and people don't appreciate it when their schedule isthrown off.
Synchronous: People see the past, present, and future as interwoven periods. Theyoften work on several projects at once, and view plans and commitments asflexible.
Internal direction versus outer direction Internal Direction: People believe that they can control nature or their environment
to achieve goals. This includes how they work with teams and within organizations. Outer Direction: People believe that nature, or their environment, controls them;
they must work with their environment to achieve goals. At work or in relationships,they focus their actions on others, and they avoid conflict where possible. Peopleoften need reassurance that they're doing a good job.
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
41/42
Copyright 2012 | SAI Global Ltd. | Confidential
The GLOBE Project's Dimensions of Culture
Power Distance: The degree to which members of a collective expect power tobe distributed equally.
Uncertainty Avoidance: The extent to which a society, organization, or grouprelies on social norms, rules, and procedures to alleviate unpredictability of futureevents.
Humane Orientation: The degree to which a collective encourages and rewardsindividuals for being fair, altruistic, generous, caring, and kind to others.
Collectivism I: (Institutional) The degree to which organizational and societalinstitutional practices encourage and reward collective distribution of resourcesand collective action.
Collectivism II: (In-Group) The degree to which individuals express pride, loyalty,and cohesiveness in their organizations or families.
Assertiveness: The degree to which individuals are assertive, confrontational,and aggressive in their relationships with others.
Gender Egalitarianism: The degree to which a collective minimizes genderinequality. Future Orientation: The extent to which individuals engage in future-oriented behaviors such as delaying gratification, planning, and investing in thefuture.
Performance Orientation: The degree to which a collective encourages andrewards group members for performance improvement and excellence.
The Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE)
42
-
8/10/2019 Cultural Influences in Anticorruption Training
42/42
Questions?
JAMES MEACHAM, CRISC
Ethics and Com pliance Consul tant ,Adviso ry ServicesCompliance Americas
[email protected] www.saiglobal.com/compliance
5637 E 2nd Street
Long BeachCA 90803
+1 562 219 2389 O+1 206 650 7490 M+1 562 200 0184 F
mailto:[email protected]://www.saiglobal.com/compliancehttp://www.saiglobal.com/compliancemailto:[email protected]