culture of safety and ethical framework 9 june 2017
TRANSCRIPT
Culture of Safety and Ethical Framework 9 June 2017
Patcharin Boonyarungsun, Ph.D
Director of Total Quality and Cost Improvement
Bangkok Hospital Head Quarter
Definition of Quality
“ The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge”
Institute of Medicine
What is safety culture?
The safety culture of an organization is the product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behavior that determine the commitment to, and the style and proficiency of, an organization’s health and safety management.
Organizations with a positive safety culture are characterized by communications founded on mutual trust, by shared perceptions of the importance of safety, and by confidence in the efficacy of preventive measures.
3
Organizing for safety; Third Report of the ACSNI (Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations) Study Group on Human Factors. Health and Safety Commission (of Great Britain). Sudbury, England: HSE Books, 1993.
High reliability organizations, organizations that consistently minimize adverse events despite carrying out intrinsically complex and hazardous work. High reliability organizations maintain a commitment to safety at all levels, from frontline providers to managers and executives.
Culture of Safety key features
acknowledgment of the high-risk nature of an organization's activities and the determination to achieve consistently safe operations
a blame-free environment where individuals are able to report errors or near misses without fear of punishment
encouragement of collaboration across ranks and disciplines to seek solutions to patient safety problems
organizational commitment of resources to address safety concerns
Safety Culture Patient safety culture can be measured
Hospitals with poor safety culture have more medical errors
Improvements in patient safety culture has been achieved by specific measures such as;
Teamwork training
Executive walk rounds
Unit-based safety teams
RRT, SBAR and other structured communication methods are unproven but being used to improve communication
6
A just culture focuses on identifying and addressing systems issues that lead individuals to engage in unsafe behaviors, while maintaining individual accountability by establishing zero tolerance for reckless behavior. It distinguishes between human error (eg, slips), at-risk behavior (eg, taking shortcuts), and reckless behavior (eg, ignoring required safety steps), in contrast to an overarching "no-blame" approach still favored by some. In a just culture, the response to an error or near miss is predicated on the type of behavior associated with the error, and not the severity of the event.
For example, reckless behavior : “ refusing to perform a "time-out" prior to surgery would merit punitive action, even if patients were not harmed.”
Just Culture Journey
AHRQ defines just culture as one in which frontline staff feel comfortable in disclosing errors including their own while maintaining professional accountability
Definitions and descriptions of just culture vary widely as does hospital execution and implementation practices.
It is important to preserve an appropriate balance of accountability
8
Just Culture You want to create a open, fair and just culture
Staff feel comfortable to report and discuss errors
You want to create a learning culture We need to learn from our mistakes and make sure staff are aware of what happens at our facility
You want to create safe systems Time outs, bar coding couples with eMAR, double check of high alert medications, do not work nurse over 60 hours a week to prevent fatigue etc.
You want to manage behavioral choices
9
Just Culture and Accountability Once hospitals have a reliable system in place they do need the threat of sanctions to ensure that everyone follows the rules
They propose suspending privileges if physicians fail to practice hand hygiene or refuse to take a time out
This carefully discriminates between system issues and individual violations of safety policies
Strong leadership is needed to ensure this Need to find out if system issue or not so good people don’t make mistakes and want learning environment
Peter Pronovost MD and Robert Wachter MD, Oct 2009 JAMA
10
Just Culture Accountability Human errors- slips, lapse or mistakes
Manage through processes, procedures, training and design-CONSOLE
At-Risk Behavior- a choice-risk not recognized or believed justified
Manage through removing incentives for at risk behavior and creating incentives for healthy behaviors and increasing situation awareness-COACH
Reckless Behavior-conscious disregard of unreasonable risk
Manage through remedial action or punitive action-PUNISH
11
Just Culture Principles
Responses to human error- willing to discuss this and discipline does not help if one makes a mistake
Responses to reckless behavior- take action if reckless behavior to one who knowingly endangers a patient- need to be fair culture
Severity bias in rejection of no harm no foul, it is not based on only looking at issue if patient was harmed
Equity is about being fair and consistent with every employee group and all are set for the same expectations
12
IHI 2016 : six patient safety “resolutions” 1. Focus on what goes right as well as learning from what goes wrong; 2. Move to greater proactivity; 3. Create systems for learning from learning; 4. Be humble — build trust and transparency; 5. Co-produce safety with patients and families; and 6. Recognize that safety is more than the absence of physical harm; it is also the pursuit of dignity and equity. “Ensuring patient safety is about ensuring the right all patients have to a free-from-harm care experience, which includes being treated equitably and with dignity.”
IHI’s National Forum in December 2016
13
Framework for Safe, Reliable, and Effective Care 14
IHI’s National Forum in December 2016
15
Cultivate Culture of Safety in BHQ is Everyone Responsibility
Develop a Culture of Safety
“An organization can improve upon safety only when leaders are visibly committed to change and when they enable staff to openly share safety information.”
Senior leaders must drive the culture change by demonstrating their own commitment to safety and providing the resources to achieve results. Their message about safety must be consistent and sustained,
Develop a Culture of Safety
Changes for Improvement
Conduct Patient Safety Leadership WalkRounds™
Create a Reporting System
Designate a Patient Safety Officer
Reenact Real Adverse Events from Your Hospital
Involve Patients in Safety Initiatives
Relay Safety Reports at Shift Changes
Appoint a Safety Champion for Every Unit
Simulate Possible Adverse Events
Conduct Safety Briefings
Create an Adverse Event Response Team http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Changes/DevelopaCultureofSafety.aspx
17
Culture of Safety Program
1. Reactive patient safety Risk management program : Peer review , RCA
2. Proactive patient safety Proactive patient safety Policy development and implementation
Compliance monitoring (Tracer )
Culture Safety System Development
Start from 2006
18
Staff Alert Response
Conference
Explanation
Occurrence Report
Patient Happy
President of Medical Staff Meet Physician
Quality Culture Cultivated in BHQ by Lead Team : System and Patient Safety Tracer ( 6.30-8.00 am every Tue, Thur)
Emergency Preparedness : Fire Safety Code Drill
Overall Perception of Patient Safety
48%
61% 64% 67% 64% 63% 60%
67% 72%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
AHRQ 2016 = 66%
25
Patient Safety Culture Result comparing to Benchmarks
Organization
Learning
Teamworkwithinunits
Feedback&commun
ication
Overallperceptio
n ofpateitnsafety
Supv/Mgrexpectation&action
Management
support
Frequencyof eventreported
Communication
openness
TeamworkAcrossunits
StaffingHandoffs&transitio
ns
Nonpunitive
responseto error
BHQ-2015 83% 80% 78% 67% 65% 65% 60% 60% 59% 34% 32% 29%
BHQ-2014 82% 80% 80% 60% 67% 69% 59% 66% 57% 38% 32% 27%
BHQ-2013 81% 78% 82% 63% 63% 67% 56% 67% 53% 33% 29% 23%
AHRQ(Avg)-2014 73% 81% 67% 66% 76% 72% 66% 62% 61% 55% 47% 44%
83% 80% 78% 67% 65% 65% 60% 60% 59% 34% 32% 29% 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
BHQ-2015 BHQ-2014 BHQ-2013 AHRQ(Avg)-2014
Hospital Level Unit Level Outcome
Patient Safety Culture: Unit Level
Composites Patient Safety Culture Items Current BHQ-15 Gap
Feed
back &
Co
mm
un
icati
on
Ab
ou
t E
rro
r
C5: In this unit, we discuss ways to prevent
errors from happening again.
87% 84% 3%
C3: We are informed about errors that
happen in this unit.
79% 80% -1%
C1: We are given feedback about changes
put into place based on event reports.
73% 72% 1%
Su
perv
iso
r/M
an
ag
er
Exp
ecta
tio
ns &
Acti
on
s
Pro
mo
tin
g P
ati
en
t S
afe
ty
B2: My supervisor/manager seriously
considers staff suggestions for improving
patient safety.
81% 79% 2%
B4R: My supervisor/manager overlooks
patient safety problems that happen over
and over.
81% 69% 12%
B1: My supervisor/manager says a good
word when he/she sees a job done
according to established patient safety
procedures.
76% 73% 3%
B3R: Whenever pressure builds up, my
supervisor/manager wants us to work faster,
even if it means taking shortcuts.
54% 42% 12%
26
Note: The item’s survey location is shown to the right in parentheses. An “R” indicates a negatively worded item, where the percent positive response is based
on those who responded “Strongly disagree” or “Disagree”, or “Never” or “Rarely”
Patient Safety Culture: Hospital Level
Composites Patient Safety Culture Items Current BHQ-15 Gap
Man
ag
em
en
t
Su
pp
ort
fo
r
Pati
en
t S
afe
ty
F8: The actions of hospital management
show that patient safety is a top priority.
90% 84% 6%
F1: Hospital management provides a work
climate that promotes patient safety.
81% 78% 3%
F9R: Hospital management seems
interested in patient safety only after an
adverse event happens.
37% 33% 4%
Team
wo
rk A
cro
ss U
nit
s F10: Hospital units work well together to
provide the best care for patients.
88% 82% 6%
F4: There is good cooperation among
hospital units that need to work together.
71% 67% 4%
F6R: It is often unpleasant to work with staff
from other hospital units.
62% 53% 9%
F2R: Hospital units do not coordinate well
with each other.
43% 33% 10%
27
Note: The item’s survey location is shown to the right in parentheses. An “R” indicates a negatively worded item, where the percent positive response is based
on those who responded “Strongly disagree” or “Disagree”, or “Never” or “Rarely”
STOP THE LINE for Patient Safety “Stop the Line for Patient Safety” supports the VA’s Blueprint for Excellence by encouraging proactive, personalized, patient-driven care in an environment that makes hospital and employee safety and well-being a priority.
Part of Risk Management Program,
employees are introduced to a tool called “the 3Ws©”:
Say what you see;
Say what you are concerned about;
Say what you want to happen to keep things safe.
To reinforce the importance of using this tool, VHA employees—from clinical staff such as nurses and doctors to administrative staff such as food service workers and environmental management --explain how it’s everyone’s responsibility to ensure patient safety.
http://www.qualityandsafety.va.gov/StoptheLine/StoptheLine.asp#sthash.tlT9LkIw.dpuf
Direction 1. Involve all the senior executives in the organization, not just the chief
executive officer(CEO) member of the senior executive team can rotate for
easier scheduling, but ideally every senior leader should perform WalkRoundsTM every week.
2. Get a commitment from senior executives for an hour every week, at a minimum of once per week. The WalkRounds™ may be rescheduled but never canceled. (Circumstances may demand postponement from an originally scheduled date, but the WalkRoundTM should still occur within the original week.)
3. Organizations should decide whether or not to announce the time and place of WalkRoundTM in advance, and the decision should be agreed to by all parties (senior leaders, managers, physicians, and front-line staff).
4. Organizations should reassure employees that all information discussed in WalkRoundsTM is strictly confidential
5. Organization may conducted WalkRoudsTM in conjunction with Safety Briefing.
Patient Safety Leadership WalkRounds™ Institute for Healthcare Improvement Idealized Design Group and Allan Frankel, MD
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
1. Patient Identification 2. Investigation Result 3. Medication Explanation 4. Safe Surgery 5. Reduce HAI 6. Fall prevention 7. Pain Control
Patient Involvement : Get Patient on Board
Safety Culture : Concept to Implementation
Safety Culture VS Just Culture
Safety Culture : Culture is Critical – Safety Culture Implementation ( 2006)
Leader : Leading for Change - Execution is Everything
Making Patients Our Partners : Ask the Patient from Patient Experience (2013)
Better Communication - Team Training : Physician Involvement is Vital (2012-2016)
31
32
33
Code of Conduct 1. Respect laws
2. Avoid political involvement
3. Protect company’s property
4. Protect confidential information and internal information
5. Avoid conflicts of interest
6. Participate in giving and receiving gifts ethically.
7. Conduct all individual and interpersonal interactions ethically and responsibly
34
Reference for Ethical
Framework Healthcare
• Laws & Regulations
• Medical and Professional Ethics
• Human Rights (WHO)
• Professional Standards
• Religious / Beliefs
• Social Norms
Organization (Hospital /BDMS)
• Vision/Mission
• BDMS Values
(B/ D/ M/S)
Moral Commitment
• Code of Conduct
35
36
Ethics program to promote
• the rights of patients;
• shared decision making between patients (or their surrogates if decisionally incapacitated) and their clinicians;
• fair policies and procedures that maximize the likelihood of achieving good, patient-centered outcomes; and
• to enhance the ethical environment for health care professionals in health care institutions.
37
• ตวแทนฝายแพทย พยาบาล
• ผมสวนไดสวนเสยอน
• นกสงคมสงเคราะห
• ตวแทนศาสนา
• ตวแทนชมชน
• ตวแทนฝายคณภาพ
• ทรพยากรบคคล
• นกกฏหมาย
Ethics members
Ethics in the Workplace
• The application of moral principles, standards of
behavior, or set of values regarding proper conduct in
the workplace as individuals and in a group setting
• Ethics allow you to distinguish(ความเหนตาง) the
difference between right and wrong
38
Fairness เสมอภาค
Autonomy การเคารพความเปนอสระ ตวตนบคคล
Integrity ซอสตย ตรงไปตรงมา
ท าสงดเปนประโยชน Common good
Beneficial
F
A
I
R Law, culture, belief, social norm, religion, professional ethics, patient rights 39
How to Encourage Good Ethics in the Workplace
How to Encourage Good Ethics in the Workplace
• Fair consequences
• Fair treatment
• Recognition
• Communication (be clear
and consistent)
• Have office policies
• Transparency
• Trainings
• Have plans of action
• Constructive feedback
40
What are some examples of good ethics in the workplace?
Good Workplace Ethics • Staying productive
• Be accountable for your actions
• Take initiative
• Think critically to be able to solve problems
• Blowing the whistle
• Be punctual
• Stay positive
• Stay professional
• Take pride in your work
• Immediately attempting to correct an issue
42
43
Poor ethic
• Conducting Personal Business on Company Time
• Taking Credit for Others' Work
• Harassing Behavior
• Disregard of Company Policy
• Failure to Honor Commitments
• Sexual Harassment
• Poor customer services
• Gossiping
• Abusing computer privileges
• Ignoring problems
• Blackmail
• Lying
• Taking on roles that are not under your job title
• Being unpunctual; poor attendance
44
Rationalization by the Wrongdoer
• Attempt by wrongdoer to justifying why they
acted a certain way:
– Everybody does it
– It’s not part of my job description
– Nobody is going to notice
– I don’t get paid enough
– Unrealistic expectations of what the job entails
45
Consequences of Poor Ethics in the Workplace
46
Consequences of Poor Ethics in the Workplace
• Stricter rules
• Fewer privileges
• An undesirable work environment
• Stunts growth and productivity
• Causes a domino affect among other colleagues
• Potential job loss
• Potential closing of the organization
47
What is ethical
dilemmas?
48
• Ethical dilemmas are situations involving conflicting morals claims, and give rise in such questions as :
• What ought I to do?
• What harm and benefit result from this decision or actions?
• What is good (virtue) or what is duty (right)? Aroskar et al
49
Ethical Dilemma Examples Personal Friendships
Tom Rose
Tony
Jack
50
No matter who he tells,…he is going to end up “hurting one", if not both friends. Does he remain silent and hope his knowledge is never discovered?
What do you make ethical decisions?
51
Information access and privacy.
52
Tony knows he should report this but would have to admit to violating the company’s information technology regulations by logging into Robert’s computer. If he warns Robert to stop his betting, he would also have to reveal the source of his information.
What
does
Tony do
in this
situation?
53
PHYSICIAN' DILEMMA ON PARTNER
NOTIFICATION FOR HIV
If the patients decide not to tell
HIV result to partner
“what can we do?"
54
END-OF-LIFE ISSUES
Would you ever
consider halting life-
sustaining therapy
because of family
demands, even if you
felt that it was
premature?
55
PRIVACY CONFIDENTIALITY
Would you ever discuss patient information in
situations that did not fully protect their privacy,
e.g., socially or while subjects not related to the
patient?
Yes
No
It depends
56
PATIENT’S RIGHT
PERSONAL BELIEF
How does a nurse care for a
patient who has had an
abortion, when the nurse
considers abortion murder? Can
that nurse with very opposing
values support that patient’s
right to choose her autonomy?
57
FREEDOM VERSUS CONTROL
A patient wants to stop
eating, but the nurse
knows the consequences
will harm the patient.
Does the nurse have the
“right” to force the patient
to eat?
58
TRUTH TELLING VERSUS DECEPTION
Families want to deny
telling the patient the truth
about the medical
condition.
Family insists telling the
patient the prognosis
will cause harm?
Patient have the right to
know?
59
EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE VERSUS
PERSONAL BELIEF
What should a nurse do when a patient is
admitted to the hospital that desperately
needs a transfusion to live but has the
belief that transfusions are unacceptable?
• The nurse knows this patient will die
without the transfusion.
• How does that nurse empathize with the
patient’s family who supports the family
member’s choice and still be supportive
of the patient’s and family’s right to this
decision?
60
How to report
dilemmas?
61
OCR
Sup HOD
?!! CEO
62
63
The Ethical Dilemmas Decision-Making Process
RULES=
ISSUES
6
65
67
Identify issues
Inform HOD manager
Fact finding
Call meeting
Decision making
Evaluate/ sustain
S E U S S I
The Ethical Decision-Making Process
68
Reference
69
1) World Medical Association International Code of Ethics, 2006 2) Declaration of Geneva, 2006 3) Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 2006 4) Physician Ethics, Thai Medical Council, 2006 5) Nurse Ethics, Thai Nursing Council, 2007 6) Pharmacist Ethics, Thai Pharmacist Council, 1995& 2003 7) Physiotherapist Ethics, Thai Physiotherapist Council, 2008 8) Radiology Technician Ethics, Health Ministry Regulation, 2004 9) Medical Technician Ethics, Thai Medical Technician Council, 2010 10) BDMS Code of Conduct, 2014 11) Patient Rights, Thai Medical Council, 2015
Safety Culture :Leader Leading for Change - Execution is Everything
Learn from Best Practice
71