current efficiency and electrogravimetric determination of the number of electrons involved in...

18
This article was downloaded by: [Columbia University] On: 12 November 2014, At: 10:46 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Analytical Letters Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lanl20 Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal Roberto Tokoro a & Marina F. Maggi Tavares a a Instituto de Química da USP , C. Postal, 20780, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Published online: 03 Jan 2007. To cite this article: Roberto Tokoro & Marina F. Maggi Tavares (1986) Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal, Analytical Letters, 19:21-22, 2079-2094, DOI: 10.1080/00032718608080867 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032718608080867 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,

Upload: marina-f

Post on 16-Mar-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

This article was downloaded by: [Columbia University]On: 12 November 2014, At: 10:46Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK

Analytical LettersPublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lanl20

Current Efficiency andElectrogravimetricDetermination of the Numberof Electrons Involved inGalvanostatic Coulometry ofMercury MetalRoberto Tokoro a & Marina F. Maggi Tavares aa Instituto de Química da USP , C. Postal, 20780, SãoPaulo, SP, BrazilPublished online: 03 Jan 2007.

To cite this article: Roberto Tokoro & Marina F. Maggi Tavares (1986) CurrentEfficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of ElectronsInvolved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal, Analytical Letters, 19:21-22,2079-2094, DOI: 10.1080/00032718608080867

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032718608080867

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and viewsexpressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of theContent should not be relied upon and should be independently verified withprimary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,

Page 2: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly orindirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of theContent.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 3: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

ANALYTICAL LETTERS, 1 9 ( 2 1 & 2 2 ) , 2079-2094 (1986)

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC

DETERMINATION OF THE NUMBER OF ELECTRONS

INVOLVED IN GALVANOSTATIC COULOMETRY OF

ME RC U RY METAL

Roberto Tokoro* and Marina F. Maggi Tavares

*Institute de Qul’mica da USP - C . Postal 20780 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil

KEY WORDS: Mercury oxidation, galvanostatic generation, electrogravimetry, current efficiency .

The efficiency of current during the oxidation

of mercury metal by galvanostatic coulometry was

total in the presence of thiosulphate. The

electrogravimetric determination of the number of

electrons involved in the oxidation of metallic

mercury in the presence of substances which have a

great affinity f o r mercury ions, showed that n=2 in

Copyright 0 1986 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.

2079

0003-27 191861 192 1-2079$3.50/0

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 4: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2080 TOKORO AND TAVARES

t h e e l e c t r o c h e m i c a l s t e p . On t h e o t h e r h a n d , t h e

mass v a r i a t i o n was n o t a good method t o d e t e r m i n e n

i n t h e absence o f complexing a g e n t due t o a c o u p l e d

chemica l p r o c e s s .

INTRODUCTION

The p r e s e n t s t u d y i s a b r a n c h o f t h e main work

conce rned w i t h t h e complex f o r m a t i o n between

m e r c u r y ( I 1 ) c a t i o n s and t h i o s u l p h a t e a n i o n s i n

aqueous media. Data f o r t h i s sys t em a r e r a r e i n t h e

l i t e r a t u r e . The c i t e d p a p e r s a r e ma in ly conce rned

w i t h t h e p o l n r o q r a p h i c d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f complex

format i o n

method. The p o l a r o g r a p h i c method is p r e f e r e d due t o

t h e d i f f i c u l t p r e p a r a t i o n o f m e r c u r y ( I 1 ) - t h i o -

s u l p h a t e s o l u t i o n s . I t i s known t h a t a l k a l i n e

m e r c u r y ( I 1 ) s o l u t i o n s h y d r o l y s e and t h a t t h i o s u l p h a t e

h y d r o l y s e s i n a c i d i c med ia , p r e c i p i t a t i n g s ix lp l iur .

S t u d i e s i n b u f f e r e d s o l u t i o n s were c a r r i e d o u t and

showed a ve ry narrow pH window where t h e two i o n s

c o u l d e x i s t w i t h o u t h y d r o l y s i n g . However, even i n

t h i s optimum pH window t h e mercury(II)/thiosulphate

s o l u t i o n i s n o t s t a b l e . A f t e r some t i m e ( a few

minu tes ) t h e s o l u t i o n t u r n s y e l l o w and a b l a c k i s h

and n o t w i t h a p o t e n t i o m e t r i c 1-5

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 5: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION 2081

p r e c i p i t a t e f o r m s , presumably mercury s u l p h i d e . I n

t h i s manner t h e time a v a i l a b l e from t h e m i x t u r e o f t h e

r e a c t a n t s u n t i l t h e beginning o f t h e d e c o m p o s i t i o n o f

t h e complex ( n o t i c e a b l e by the a o p e s r a n c e o f ye l lowish

c o l o r ) was t h e l i m i t i n g f a c t o r f o r t h e u s e o f

p o t e n t i o m e t r i c methods. O p t i m i z a t i o n o f t h i s

c o n d i t i o n was a c h i e v e d by c o u l o m e t r i c g e n e r a t i o n o f

Hg2+ c a t i o n s i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f t h i o s u l p h a t e . T h i s

a l lowed t h e p o t e n t i o m e t r i c measurement due t o t h e

s t a b i l i z a t i o n o f t h e complex o v e r a l a r g e r p e r i o d o f

t i m e . The d e c o m p o s i t i o n o f t h e complex c o u l d be

d e t e c t e d by t h e c o l o r change a s w e l l a s by p o t e n t i a l

i n s t a b i l i t y a f t e r few m i n u t e s .

PURPOSE

The o b j e c t i v e o f t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y i s t h e

d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e c u r r e n t e f f i c i e n c y f o r t h e

o x i d a t i o n o f mercury m e t a l i n d i f f e r e n t s u p p o r t i n g

e l e c t r o l y t e s . The number o f e l e c t r o n s i n v o l v e d i n t h e

e l e c t r o c h e m i c a l s t e p o f t h e p r o c e s s i s a l s o d e t e r m i n e d .

HYPOTHESIS

Based on p r e l i m i n a r y s t u d i e s and c h e m i c a l

b e h a v i o r t h r e e main hypoteses were e s t a b l i s h e d :

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 6: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2082 TOKORO AND TAVARES

1) E l e c t r o c h e m i c a l o x i d a t i o n s t r a i g h t t o Hg2+ (n=2)

Hgo - Hg2+ + 2e electrochemical s tep

Hg + Hgo II? Hg2 coupled chemical s tep 2+ 2+

2) S t cpwise e l e c t r o c h e m i c a l o x i d a t i o n t o Hg2+ (n=2)

~ g ' --- ~ g + + l e first electrochemical s t ep

~ g + --- ~ g ' + + l e second electrochemical s tep

coupled chemical s tep 2+ H Z + + Hgo --3 HgZ

3) E l e c t r o c h e m i c a l o x i d a t i o n t o Hg+ (n=1)

2x(Hg0 -- Hg+ + l e ) electrochemical s tep

Hg+ + Hg+ + Hg2 f i r s t chemical s tep (dimeri zat ion)

second chemical s tep (disproportionationj

2+

- H:+ + Hgo

E X P E R I M E N T A L D A T A

Mercurous c a t i o n s were g e n e r a t e d i n two w a y s :

c h e m i c a l l y and c o u l o m e t r i c a l l y . The chemica l

g e n e r a t i o n o f mercurous c a t i o n s was done i n non

complexing media, t a k i n g 5 m l o f m e t a l mercury i n a

2 0 m l b e a k e r and add ing a s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n o f

m e r c u r i c ( I 1 ) p e r c h l o r a t e ( a c i d i c s o l u t i o n ) . T h e

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 7: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION 2083

s o l u t i o n was l e f t d u r i n g 2 h o u r s u n d e r a b l a n k e t o f

n i t r o g e n and m i l d l y s t i r r e d , k e e p i n g t h e t e m p e r a t u r e

a t 2 5 O C . The c h e m i c a l r e a c t i o n t h a t o c c u r r e d w a s :

t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g e q u i l i b r i u m c o n s t a n t b e i n g :

The c o u l o m e t r i c g e n e r a t i o n o f m e r c u r o u s c a t i o n s

a t c o n s t a n t c u r r e n t i n non c o m p l e x i n g media was

c a r r i e d o u t p l a c i n g 5 m l o f m e t a l mercu ry i n t o 20 m l

c e l l , and a d d i n g a known volume o f s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n

o f sodium p e r c h l o r a t e . A c o n s t a n t c u r r e n t o f 2 0 mA

was imposed d u r i n g 30 m i n u t e s .

The c o m p a r i s o n o f t h e s e two d i f f e r e n t methods o f

g e n e r a t i n g mercu rous i o n s showed t h a t i n t h e

s u p e r n a t a n t s o l u t i o n Hg2 and Hg2+ a r e i n e q u i l i b r i u m ,

t h e amount o f Hg b e i n g s m a l l .

2 +

2 +

C u r r e n t E f f i c i e n c y and E l e c t r o g r a v i m e t r y

I n t h e c o u l o m e t r i c g e n e r a t i o n o f m e r c u r o u s

s p e c i e s a t c o n s t a n t c u r r e n t i t i s i m p o r t a n t t o

d e t e r m i n e t h e c u r r e n t e f f i c i e n c y t o make s u r e n o s i d e

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 8: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2084 TOKORO AND TAVARES

r e a c t i o n s a r e o c c u r r i n g s i m u l t a n e o u s l y . The number o f

e l e c t r o n s i n v o l v e d i n t h e e l e c t r o c h e m i c a l s t e p i s

s t a t e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e

r e a c t i o n :

g i v i n g t h e o v e r a l l 6-8

2 + 2 Hgo - 2e - Hg2

t h e f o l l o w i n g chemica l r e a c t i o n i s w e l l known:

Hg2+ + Hgo - Hg; +

I n t h i s way t h e r e i s a c o n t r o v e r s y abou t t h e number

o f e l e c t r o n s (one o r two) i n v o l v e d i n t h e o x i d a t i o n

o f mercury m e t a l t o c a t i o n s i n t h e e l e c t r o c h e m i c a l

s t e p .

To e l u c i d a t e t h i s f a c t , e l e c t r o g r a v i m e t r i c

measurements were done u s i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g p rocedure :

A known mass o f mercury was s u b m i t t e d t o e lectrolysis .

A f t e r t h e e l e c t r o l y s i s t h e r ema in ing mercury was

washed t h o r o u g h l y w i t h w a t e r , d r y e d c a r e f u l l y w i t h

h y g r o s c o p i c p a p e r , washed w i t h a l c o h o l and d r y e d

c a r e f u l l y w i t h h y g r o s c o p i c p a p e r , and f i n a l l y d r y e d

w i t h h o t a i r u s i n g a h a i r d r y e r d u r i n g 30-60 seconds.

A f t e r c o o l i n g t h e mercury was weighed. The d i f f e r e n c e

i n mass c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e amount e l e c t r o l y s e d . A

Metrohm c e l l EA876-20 was used . A mercury poo l was the

anode and ;i p l a t i n u m e l e c t r o l e , t h e c a t h o d e , b o t h

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 9: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION 2085

TABLE 1

Supporting Generated Theoretical Number of Efficiency

electrolyte mass (g) mass (8) ELECTRONS* (%I

NaC104 1.93M 0.0745C 0 .0021 0.0746 1 99.9

Na2S203 0.08M 0 .0370~ 0.0016 0.0373 2 99.2

HC104 0.(),2M

NaC104 1.76M

EDTA 0.04M 0 . 0 4 5 2 t 0.0020 0.0373 2 "121"

NaC104 1.84M

* See t e s t .

s e p a r a t e d p r o p e r l y w i t h a s i n t e r e d g l a s s a g a r - a g a r

p l u g . The volume o f s o l u t i o n was 1 0 . 0 0 m l , t h e

c o n s t a n t c u r r e n t 2 0 . 0 0 mA and t ime 3 0 m i n u t e s . The

sys t em w a s m a i n t a i n e d unde r a b l a n k e t o f n i t r o g e n

and t h e t e m p e r a t u r e k e p t a t ( 2 5 i 0.2)°C. The

s u p p o r t i n g e l e c t r o l y t e was sodium p e r c h l o r a t e i n non

complexing med ia , and t h i o s u l p h a t e and EDTA as

complexing a g e n t s o f m e r c u r i c ( I 1 ) i o n s i n aqueous

media. The same amount o f e l e c t r i c i t y was p a s s e d

th rough a l l s o l u t i o n s . The e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a a r e

c o n s i g n e d i n TABLE 1.

According t o F a r a d a y ' s L a w t h e f o l l o w i n g

e x p r e s s i o n i s v a l i d : n = (W) i t

mF

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 10: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2086 TOKORO AND TAVARES

E x p e r i m e n t a l l y t h e same amount o f e l e c t r i c i t y was

t r a n s f e r r e d . T h e o r e t i c a l l y t h e mass o f mercu ry

e l e c t r o l y s e d depends on t h e number o f e l e c t r o n s

i n v o l v e d i n t h e p r o c e s s . T h e r e f o r e , i f n = 1 t h e m a s s

m = k / n l and i n t h e c a s e o f n = 2 , i n 2 = k / n 2 . T h u s ,

m l = 2 . m 2 . C o n s i d e r i n g t h e f i r s t h y p o t h e s i s

e n u n c i a t e d e a r l i e r , where t h e number o f e l e c t r o n s i s

t w o , t h e v a r i a t i o n o f t o t a l mass o f mercu ry m e t a l

w i l l b e due t o t h e v a r i a t i o n o f mass c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o

t h e e l e c t r o c h e m i c a l s t e p and t o t h e v a r i a t i o n o f m a s s

r e l a t e d t o t h e f o l l o w i n g c h e m i c a l s t e p . I n non

complex ing m e d i a , where Hg2+ i s n o t s t a b i l i z e d , t h e

c h e m i c a l s t e p a l w a y s o c c u r s . I n t h i s way, t h e

v a r i a t i o n o f t o t a l mass ( g r a v i m e t r y ) a s i n d i c a t o r o f

t h e number o f e l e c t r o n s i n v o l v e d i n t h e electrochemical

s t e p i s n o t c o r r e c t . However , i n c o m p l e x i n g m e d i a ,

where t h e l i g a n d s t a b i l i z e s H g 2 + , t h e p r o c e s s o c c u r s

w i t h c h e m i c a l s t e p b l o c k a g e . Now t h e v a r i a t i o n o f

mass i s a c t u a l i n d i c a t o r o f t h e number o f e l e c t r o n s

i n v o l v e d i n the electrochemical s t e p . I f the ,:roccss proceeds

i n c o m p l e x i n g media f o r Hg , a c c o r d i n g t o t h e f i r s t

and s e c o n d h y p o t h e s e s , t h e mass v a r i a t i o n w i l l b eha l f

t h e mass v a r i a t i o n i n non complex ing med ia . I f t h e

p r o c e s s f o l l o w s t h e t h i r d h y p o t h e s i s , t h e mass

v a r i a t i o n w i l l b e t h e same i n corr!ilcxint. a!ld i n non

1

2 +

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 11: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION 2087

complexing media. The T A B L E 1 shows t h a t t h e mass

e l e c t r o l y s e d i n t h i o s u l p h a t e media i s h a l f t h e mass

e l e c t r o l y s e d i n absence o f complexing a g e n t . T h i s

l e a d s us t o t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t t h e p r o c e s s f o l l o w s

h y p o t h e s e s 1 and 2 , w i t h two e l e c t r o n s , n = 2 , and

r u l e s o u t h y p o t h e s i s 3 . By now we a r e n o t a b l e t o

d i s t i n g u i s h t h e f i r s t and t h e second h y p o t h e s e s

u s i n g g r a v i m e t r y . I n t h e c a s e o f EDTA i t seems t h a t

t h e complexa t ion i s n o t c o m p l e t e ; a l i m i t a t i o n maybe

p r e s e n t due t o l i b e r a t i o n o f p r o t o n .

r e a c t i n g c h e m i c a l l y w i t h H g , y i e l d i n g an i n c r e a s e i n

t h e mass o f mercury and making t h e e f f i c i e n c y a p p e a r

t o be o v e r one hundred p e r c e n t . The e f f i c i e n c y o f

c u r r e n t was o b t a i n e d by t h e r e l a t i o n o f g e n e r a t e d

mass and t h e o r e t i c a l mass.

some H~~~ i s

Complimentary S t u d i e s w i t h Spo t T e s t s

The e a r l i e r s t u d i e s were n o t a b l e t o d i s t i n g u i s h

whe the r t h e o x i d a t i o n o f mercury o c c u r s s t e p w i s e o r

whe the r t h e two e l e c t r o n s a r e removed a t o n c e . I f t h e

p r o c e s s i n v o l v e s two s t e p s , t h e f o r m a t i o n o f

m e r c u r y ( I 1 ) i s n o t p o s s i b l e i n a c o u l o m e t r y experiment

i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f c h l o r i d e , which s t a b i l i z e s H g 2 . I f

t h e o x i d a t i o n i s s t r a i g h t t o H g ( I I ) , t h e a p p e a r a n c e

2 +

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 12: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2088 TOKORO AND TAVARES

o f Hg(1) i n .:he s o l u t i o n i s due t o a chemica l s t e p ,

b u t some Hg(I1) i o n s w i l l be p r e s e n t i n t h e s o l u t i o n .

I n t h i s way t h e d e t e c t i o n o f Hg(I1) i n t h e s o l u t i o n

i s a s t r o n g argument i n t h e e l u c i d a t i o n o f t h e

mechanism. The e l e c t r o g r a v i m e t r y e x p e r i m e n t i n t h e

p r e s e n c e o f c h l o r i d e f a i l e d b e c a u s e o f l o s s o f

ca lome l p r e c i p i t a t e d u r i n g t h e washing o p e r a t i o n . The

l i t e r a t u r r c i t e s d i p h e n y l c a r b a z i d e a s an o r g a n i c

r e a g e n t f o r H g 2 + , b u t c h l o r i d e can i n t e r f e r e w i t h t h e

t e s t depend ing on i t s c o n c e n t r a t i o n .

Mercurous c a t i o n s were g e n e r a t e d c h e m i c a l l y from

s t a n d a r d s o l u t i o n o f Hgz+ and Hg y i e l d w a s a p p r o x i m a t e l y

2 0 mM o f Hg2 . The s u p e r n a t a n t was t a k e n and

i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t e s t s f o r Hg2+ were pe r fo rmed w i t h

d i f f e r e n t amounts o f C 1 - p r e s e n t . When c h l o r i d e was

added , p r e c i p i t a t i o n o f ca lomel o c c u r e d . From t h e

t e s t we can o b s e r v e t h a t t h e p r e s e n c e o f c h l o r i d e up

t o a 1: 2 p r o p o r t i o n ( 1 Hg;' : 2 C1-) a l l o w e d t h e

i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f Hg2+. Above t h e 1 : 2 p r o p o r t i o n t h e

t e s t was n e g a t i v e . C h l o r i d e seems t o be a s t r o n g e r

l i g a n d f o r mercury t h a n d i p h e n y l c a r b a z i d e , t h u s

masking t h e t e s t . (TABLE 2 ) .

2 +

Mercurous c a t i o n s were g e n e r a t e d by galvanostatic

cou lomet ry i n t h e a b s e n c e o f complexing a g e n t , t o

y i e l d an a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 8 . 6 mM s o l u t i o n . The amount

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 13: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION 2089

2 + TABLE 2 Spo t T e s t f o r t h e p r e s e n c e o f Hg

IC1-1 added o v e r T e s t f o r Hg2+ w i t h d i p h e n y l c a r b a z i d e s upe r n a t an t

mM

IC1-1 added o v e r T e s t f o r Hg2+ w i t h d i p h e n y l c a r b a z i d e s upe r n a t an t

mM

0

11

2 1

4 1 . 2

4 8 . 6

6 9 . 5 -

8 2 . 6 -

2 + T A B L E 3 Spo t T e s t f o r t h e p r e s e n c e o f Hg

I C 1 - 1 added o v e r T e s t f o r Hg2+ w i t h p12 c a r b a z i d e s u p e r n a t a n t s o l u t i o n

a f t e r e l e c t r o l y s i s

2 1

3 5 . 2

39

4 0 . 5 -

4 5 . 5

5 3

1 2 3

o f c h a r g e was c a l c u l a t e d w i t h t h e a s sumpt ion n = 2

and t h e occurence o f t h e chemica l r e a c t i o n between

Hg2+ and Hg. Tak ing t h e s u p e r n a t a n t s o l u t i o n , t e s t s f o r

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 14: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2090 TOKORO AND TAVARES

Hg2+ were done i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f d i f f e r e n t amounts o f

c h l o r i d e .

Again when ( C 1 - 1 i s be low t h e p r o p o r t i o n 1 : 2 t h e t e s t

is p o s i t i v e . Above t h i s i t i s n e g a t i v e . C h l o r i d e

i n d e e d i n t e r f e r e s w i t h t h e t e s t . (TABLE 3 ) .

G a l v a n o s t a t i c c o u l o m e t r y e x p e r i m e n t s f o r

o x i d a t i o n o f Hg i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f d i f f e r e n t

c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f c h l o r i d e were p e r f o r m e d . The c h a r g e

t h a t went t h r o u g h t h e mercu ry p o o l e l e c t r o d e was 2 + s u f f i c i e n t t o g e n e r a t e a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 8 . 6 mM o f HgZ ,

a s s u m i n g t h a t n = 2 . The a n a l y s i s o f e a c h s u p e r n a t a n t

s o l u t i o n i s g i v e n be low:

2 + T A B L E 4 S p o t T e s t f o r t h e p r e s e n c e o f Hg

I C 1 - 1 p r e s e n t i n t h e Tes t f o r Hg2+ w i t h

-

s o l u t i o n s s u b m i t t e d t o e l e c t r o l y s i s $4, c a r b a z i d e

mM

1 0 +

2 0 +

36 -

37.2 -

37.2 -

38 -

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 15: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION 2091

To p r e c i p i t a t e a l l mercurous i o n s w i t h chlor ide1.37 mM

o f C 1 - a r e needed. However, t h e t e s t was n e g a t i v e from

36 mM o n , b e f o r e t h e s t o i c h i o m e t r y f o r ca lomel

f o r m a t i o n was r e a c h e d . T h i s means t h a t i n a coulometry

expe r imen t i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f c h l o r i d e no Hg2+ i s

formed unde r t h e p r e s e n t s p o t t e s t s e n s i t i v i t y .

C h l o r i d e s t a b i l i z e s Hg'. The d i m e r i z a t i o n can o c c u r

t h r o u g h t h e chemica l s t e p s Hg+ + C 1 - - HgCl and

2 HgCl - Hg2C12. T h i s e x p e r i m e n t shows t h a t i n t h e

e l e c t r o - o x i d a t i o n o f Hg i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f C 1 - t h e

c h a r g e i s t r a n s f e r e d i n o n e - e l e c t r o n s t e p and Hg(1)

i s s t a b i l i z e d by C 1 - . I n t h e a b s e n c e o f C 1 - t h e

o x i d a t i o n goes up t o Hg(I1) i n two r a p i d one-

- e l e c t r o n s t e p s . (TABLE 4 ) . 2 + Another t e s t was done i n which 1.37.2 mM o f Hg2

were g e n e r a t e d c o u l o m e t r i c a l l y i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f

c h l o r i d e . Using s u l f i d e as a r e a g e n t f o r Hg2 , t h e

t e s t was n e g a t i v e . A c o u l o m e t r i c b l a n k t e s t i n t h e

a b s e n c e o f c h l o r i d e proved t h e p r e s e n c e o f Hg by

means o f t h e a d d i t i o n o f s u l f i d e .

2 +

2 +

F i n a l l y , a g a l v a n o s t a t i c cou lomet ry e x p e r i m e n t

i n which Hg was o x i d i s e d t o y i e l d 1.18 mM i n t h e

p r e s e n c e o f d i f f e r e n t amounts o f t h i o s u l f a t e was

pe r fo rmed . Af t e r e l e c t r o l y s i s t h e p r e s e n c e o f Hg2

was i n v e s t i g a t e d w i t h C 1 - . The amount o f Hg

2 +

2 +

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 16: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2092 TOKORO AND TAVARES

2 +

T e s t f o r Hg2

TABLE 5 Spo t T e s t f o r t h e p r e s e n c e o f Hg2 2 + S20; p r e s e n t i n t h e

s o l u t i o n s u b m i t t e d

mM t o e l e c t r o l y s i s w i t h C 1 -

1 8 . 6

37.2

55.8

g e n e r a t e d was a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 9 m M , c o n s i d e r i n g n = 2 .

N o f o r m a t i o n o f Hgf'was o b s e r v e d . (TABLE 5 ) . T h i s

means t h a t t h e o x i d a t i o n t a k e s p l a c e s t r a i g h t t o Hg(I1) 2 + ( n = 2 ) i n one s t e p t h a t t h e i n t e r a c t i o n between Hg

and Hg does n o t o c c u r due t o t h e s t a b i l i z a t i o n o f Hg

w i t h S20;. T h i s complex decomposes o v e r some t i m e

y i e l d i n g b l a c k HgS.(Hg(S203)21 _ H 2 3 HgS + SO:-+ S 2 0 i + 2H'.

2+

CONCLUSION

The e l e c t r o o x i d a t i o n o f mercury i n non

complexing s u p p o r t e l e c t r o l y t e s goes d i r e c t l y t o

H g ( I I ) , i n a r a p i d sequence o f two o n e - e l e c t r o n s t e p s ,

f o l l o w e d by t h e c o u p l e d chemica l p r o c e s s :

Hg2+ + Hg - Hg; + ( n = 2)

I n a complexing medium t h a t s t a b i l i z e s t h e

i n t e r m e d i a t e H g ( I ) , f o r i n s t a n c e C1-, ' t h e o x i d a t i o n

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 17: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

CURRENT EFFICIENCY AND ELECTROGRAVIMETRIC DETERMINATION 2093

s t o p s a t H g ( I ) , p r e c i p i t a t i n g c a l o m e l a s t h e

f o l l o w i n g c o u p l e d c h e m i c a l p r o c e s s ( n = 1 ) . No

f o r m a t i o n o f Hg2+ o c c u r s i n t h i s way. 2 + I n a complex ing medium t h a t s t a b i l i z e s Hg , f o r

example S 2 0 J , t h e e l e c t r o o x i d a t i o n goes d i r e c t l y t o

Hg( I I ) a n d no f o l l o w i n g c o u p l e d c h e m i c a l r e a c t i o n

o c c u r s ( n = 2 ) . No f o r m a t i o n o f Hg2 o c c u r s i n t h i s

way. The e f f i c i e n c y o f c u r r e n t i s t o t a l .

2 +

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S

The work was s u p p o r t e d by f u n d s r e c e i v e d fromthe

B r a s i l i a n F o u n d a t i o n FAPESP (Fundaqao d e Amparo S P e s -

q u i s a do E s t a d o d e Sao P a u l o ) u n d e r g r a n t np 80/1487-5.

Dr. Pe te r Tiedemann r e a d i n g e n g l i s h m a n u s c r i p t .

REFERENCES

1. I.M. K o l t h o f f and C.S . M i l l e r , J . A m e r . Chem. S O C , 6 3 , 1 4 0 5 , ( 1 9 4 1 ) . _ _ -

2 . D . G . D a v i s , A n a l . Chem., __ 3 0 , 1 7 2 9 , ( 1 9 5 8 ) .

3 . C . J . Nyman and T . S a l a z a r , Ana l . Chem., - 3 3 , 1467, ( 1 9 6 1 ) .

4 . T . Murayama, T . Sawasak i a n d S . S a k u r a b a , B u l l . Chem. SOC. J p n . , - 4 3 , 2820 , ( 1 9 7 0 ) .

5 . L . K u l l b u r g , Acta Chem. S c a n d . , A28, 9 7 9 , (1974) .

6 . J . Ravenda , C o l l e c t . Czech. Chem. Commun., - 6 , 4 3 3 , ( 1 9 3 4 ) .

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014

Page 18: Current Efficiency and Electrogravimetric Determination of the Number of Electrons Involved in Galvanostatic Coulometry of Mercury Metal

2094 TOKORO A N D TAVARES

7. I.M. Kolthoff and J.J. Lingane, "Polarography", Interscience Publishers, New York, 1952, p.573.

8. T. Biegler, J.Electroana1. Chem., - 357, 374, (1963).

9. F. Feigl, "Spot Tests in Inorganic Analysis", Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1972, p.307.

Received August 25, 1986 Accepted September 5, 1986

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Col

umbi

a U

nive

rsity

] at

10:

46 1

2 N

ovem

ber

2014