current state narrative… knight management center lecture hall
TRANSCRIPT
STAKEHOLDERS
GSB Representative: Kathleen Cavanaugh
-Faculty & Staff
-GSB Students
Capital Planning and Mgmt.: Tom Bauer
- General Stanford Population
GSB IT/Audio Visual Team
Facilities Management
DESIGNERS
Architect: Boora Architects
- Arup
-Structural
-Mechanical
-Electrical
-Plumbing
-Acoustics
-Fire/Code
-Sustainability Consultant
-LEED Consultant
-Interior Designer
-Landscape Architect
-Geotechnical Consultant
-Parking Consultant
-Accessibility Consultant
-Civil Engineer
GATEKEEPERS
Fire Inspector
Structural Reviewer
DECISION MAKERS
GSB Representative: Kathleen Cavanaugh
Architect: Boora Architects
Capital Planning and Mgmt.: Tom Bauer
Knight Management CenterLecture Hall
Project TEAMS…
Knight Management CenterLecture Hall
General Stanford Population
General Stanford Population
Facilities Management
Facilities Management
Accessibility ConsultantAccessibility Consultant
Parking Consultant
Parking Consultant
Geotechnical Consultant
Geotechnical Consultant
Landscape ArchitectLandscape Architect
Interior DesignerInterior
DesignerArupArup
CM/GCTunerCM/GCTuner
ArchitectBOORAArchitectBOORA
Office of Land, Buildings and
real Estate
Office of Land, Buildings and
real EstateGSB
AdministrationGSB
Administration
Sub Contractors
Sub Contractors
Design-Build Sub
contractors
Design-Build Sub
contractors
LEEDConsultant
SustainabilityConsultant
SustainabilityConsultantFire/CodeFire/CodeAcousticsAcousticsPlumbingPlumbingElectricalElectricalMechanicalMechanicalStructuralStructural
Owner
Architecture& Contractor
Consultant& SC
GSBRepresentative
GSBRepresentative
StanfordCPM
StanfordCPM
GSB IT/Audio Visual TeamGSB IT/Audio Visual Team
GSB Student
GSB Student
Faculty & Staff
Faculty & Staff
Structural ReviewerStructural Reviewer
Fire Inspector
Fire Inspector
Stakeholders
Gatekeepers
Interior DesignerInterior
DesignerArupArup
GSB Alumni Asso.
Santa Clara county
Office of Registrar
Stanford Law School
Board of Trustees
University Provost
University Architect
Economic Goals
Within Budget
Energy Efficient
Meet Programming Needs
Maintain Stanford Architectural Theme
Stay on schedule
Low lifecycle cost
Environmental Goals
Energy Efficient
Good Daylighting
Facility Performance Goals
Top of the line Facility
Good Daylighting
Eliminate Outside Sound
Conceal Trash Compactor
Traffic Control
Good Teaching/Performance Space
Ergonomic
Ease of IT use
Multi-use Facility
Thermal Comfort
Texturize Space
Sound Waves In Phase
Structure Performance Goals
Structurally Sound
Energy Efficient
Code Compliant
Knight Management CenterLecture Hall
Project GOALS…
Knight Management CenterLecture HallProject GOALS…
GO
ALS
ME
TR
ICS
Maximize Daylighting
• 80% lighting needs during day met by natural daylight ~ (+3)
• 40% lighting needs during day met by natural daylight ~ (0)
• 0% lighting needs during day met by natural daylight ~ (-3)
Maximize Space Functionality
• Ergonomic seating, excellent visibility for all audience members, audio quality for speaking and music ~ (+3)
• Adequate seating, visibility limited to front section, basic ability to hear speaker ~ (0)
• Highly uncomfortable seating, poor visibility from all sections, hot and cold spots for >20% audience ~ (-3)
Stay Within Budget
Primary GOALS & METRICS…
• Building is designed and constructed for less than initial budget ~ (+3)
• Building is designed and constructed exactly at budget ~ (0)
• Building is designed and constructed for more than 1.5 times initial budget ~ (-3)
Knight Management CenterLecture Hall
Future State Narrative…
Knight Management CenterLecture Hall
Z goals set(10 point weight)
= 100 possible project points
(10 point weight)
= 100 possible project points
X goals set(60 point weight)
Y goals set(30 point weight)
+
+
+
+
Current MACDADI: Designers & Stakeholders DEFINE Goals
Knight Management CenterLecture Hall
Architect Contractor CP & M GSB
Prestige Profit Practicality Performance
INNOVATION: Designers & Stakeholders DEFINE Preferences
Problem: CONFLICTING Goals
NEEDS
WANTS
= design option points
# points received* (Level 3)
+
# points received* (Level 2)
+
# points received* (Level 1)
~ for each design option…
(# goals met * point weight)
# goals set= # points received*Point Equation:
(per level)
THE SACRED COW
Level 1
(non-negotiable goal)
Level 2
Level 3
THE SACRED COW(non-negotiable goal)
THE SACRED COW(non-negotiable goal)
THE SACRED COW(non-negotiable goal)
THE SACRED COW(non-negotiable goal)
IDEALLY:
Design Option
w/ Most Points =
Best Design Option