curriculum mapping
TRANSCRIPT
http://learning-maps.ncl.ac.uk
Simon CotterillFaculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle Universty
Curriculum Mapping: linking outcomes, assessment and more
Curriculum Maps: Potential role in Monitoring & QA
Declaredcurriculum
Taughtcurriculum
Learning &development
‘Constructive Alignment’(curriculum – T&L – assessment)
Better insight into learning outside the curriculum
External resources Prior learning ‘Life-wide’ learning
Identify popularexternal resources(QA + peer review)
Map to otherCurricula(widens learningopportunities)
Identify ‘gaps’in teaching
Identifyduplication
Monitor access & equality of learning opportunities
Maps: levels of detail
Curriculum strands Module maps Session maps
Key curriculum drivers for the project:
1: Modular courses - promoting cross-modular learning- mapping to transferable graduate skills / careers
2: Medicine: Communicating Complex Curricula
Dynamic Learning Maps
Understanding linkageswithin the spiral curriculum(students & teachers)
Occasional Teachers-some unintended duplication in teaching
Part of the CurriculumDelivery Programme
Choice of views
Text-based interface
Mind-map style interface
n=193 (student response system)
I Prefer:
Diversity and strong polarisation ofpersonal preferences for visual, text or other views
Further evaluation results:https://learning-maps.ncl.ac.uk/
utilises ‘semantic’ connections madebetween topics and with resources
Search over the curriculum
Case Study: DentistryDentistry at Newcastle
All course leaders were invited to a ‘hands-on’ workshop • Brief demo of how to use DLM • Brief instructions (2 pages with screenshots)• Clear task to enter their course outcomes and map them to the GDC
Stepwise Strategy: Course outcomes were later mapped to assessments.
• 1,616 course outcomes mapped over the 5 yr programme • 3,741 linkages between course outcomes and 173 GDC outcomes. • 2,747 linkages between course outcomes and 51 assessments. • DLM extrapolates how GDC outcomes are assessed.
Course outcomes mapped to Graduate Skills Frameworkby a final year student• 1,834 links between outcomes & skills/attributes• Identified 2 areas with relatively thin coverage• Presented at NU Learning & Teaching conf. 2013
Knowing how a teaching session relates to the rest of the curriculum is important to me
n=193 (student response system)
“Will increase relevance of Phase I lectures to clinical presentations/experience”
From a students point of view, one could be much clearer on ‘the big picture’, as you have a curriculum map laid out in front of you...”
77% Agreed
Stage 4 Medical Students- Focus groups
Having the map will be useful for revision
n=193 (student response system)
? “Any way of ticking off lectures revised?”
“Excellent revision tool”
“Helpful revision tool”
Stage 4 Medical Students
Clinical Teacher
91% Agreed
It would be useful to add notes and reflections to teaching sessions and other parts of the map
“[liked] linking the portfolio (which mayappear otherwise abstract) with the rest of a student’s education”.
“link to portfolio may increase its usage!”
Stage 4 Medical Students(Focus Group)
73% of students agree
But clinical teaching staff skeptical:
n=193 (student response system)
“Can this really be used for portfolio (if voluntary) ?“
“How to engage student with e-portfolios – won’t work without their engagement”
Challenges for Curriculum Mapping ♯1
Stage 5
Stage 4
Stage 3
Stage 2
Stage 1
2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12
Student journeythrough thecurriculum
‘here and now’teaching focus
Between major restructuring of the MBBS curriculum (aprox. every 5-7yrs): stable: units (modules), programme outcomes minor adjustments: sessions, cases, unit outcomes (responsive to evaluation / QA)
more variation in assessment & differences in delivery by 4 ‘Base Units’ (stages 3 & 5)
The curriculum changes over time
Challenges for Curriculum Mapping ♯2
• Staff time / Staff engagement
• Level of Granularity
• Consistency
Developing a Mapping Strategy
• Stepwise mappingCourse OutcomesProfessional OutcomesAssessment
• Involve Staff early (including Admin team)
• Roll out to students later?
RIDLR & SupOERGlue (2 x JISC funded OER Rapid Innovation projects)
Return Paradata
LR Node
DLM
Harvest OERs /Paradata
PublishOER (HEA/JISC UKOER Phase 3 project)
• Investigating new business models for embedding publishers content in OERs• Partnership with Elsevier, JISC Collections, Rightscom and education providers • Some DLM-related activities
Open Educational Resources
Project blog posts at: : http://www.medev.ac.uk/
OER Bookmarking (JISC-CETIS Rapid Innovation project)
Co-CurateDLM ‘lite’ with visual resource system
Project funded by
Further information & Public Demonstrator:
http://learning-maps.ncl.ac.uk
Thank You