custom 3d scaffolds for regenerative medicine applications · audie l. murphy memorial va hospital...
TRANSCRIPT
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Eric M. Brey, Ph.D.
South Texas Veterans Health Care System
University of Texas at San Antonio
Custom 3D Scaffolds for
Regenerative Medicine Applications
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Craniofacial Defects
Craniomaxillofacial reconstruction often requires complex, multistage surgical procedures.
There is a critical need for improved methods for reconstruction of complex skeletal defects.
Craniomaxillofacial injury is the primary unfitting condition in many soldiers evacuated from current conflicts.
Sutradahar et al., PNAS, 2010
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Tissue Engineering
“Tissue engineering is the
application of the principles and
methods of engineering and the life
sciences toward the fundamental
understanding of structure-
formation relationships in normal
and pathological mammalian tissues
and the development of biological
substrates to restore, maintain or
improve functions.”
Skalak and Fox (eds.) , Tissue Engineering, Alan Liss 1, 1, 1995
Sutradahar et al., PNAS, 2010
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Akar et al., Tissue Engineering Part B, 2018
Approach
Image the defect
Identify the structure required
Generate PMMA chambers
Load tissue engineering strategy
Implant against the periosteum
Harvest
Transfer to the defect
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
in vivo bioreactor – growth of vascularized bone within the body by implantation of a molded chamber against
the periosteum (vasculogenic, osteogenic) in an uncompromised location
Brey et al., Plast Rec Surg, 2007; Cheng et al, Tissue Eng, 2005, Plast Rec Surg, 2006, 2009.
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Periosteum guided prefabrication using morcellilzed bone graft can lead to the growth of vascularized bone of clinical size and volume
Brey et al., Plast Rec Surg, 2007; Cheng et al, Tissue Eng, 2005, Plast Rec Surg, 2006, 2009.
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Design a tissue engineering scaffold that stimulates directed vascularization into the material while
maintaining tissue volume.
z
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
• Biocompatible, resistant to protein and cell
adhesion
• Incorporation of biofunctionality into hydrogels
by immobilization of bioactive derivatives of
photopolymerizable monomers
• Introduction of poly(L-lactic acid) units generate
copolymers that are degradable by hydrolysis
Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Pore Size• Porosity allowed invasion in the absence
of degradation.
• Vessel invasion varies with pore size in vitro and in vivo
• Very little vessel invasion observed in pore size < 50 µm
Chiu et al., Biomaterials. 2011
Vessel invasion depth
Chiu et al., Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Fibrin loaded pores
Fibrin loaded in the pores throughout the scaffold volume
Fibrin stimulated vascular ingrowth in a dose dependent manner
Jiang et al., Tissue Eng Part A. 2013
Vessel density
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA HospitalChiu et al. PLoS One, 2013; Chiu et al., J Fluoresc 2012
• Introduction of poly(L-lactic acid) units into PEG hydrogels to generate copolymers that are degradable by hydrolysis
• By varying the ratio of PEG-DA to PEG-PLLA-DA we can generate porous hydrogels with varying degradation times
• The hydrogels maintain their pore size and structure during degradation
Degradation
Pore size
Degradation time
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Gradient Scaffold Preparation
25% PEG-DA (Mw ≈8000) Fibrinogen within the pores
300-500 µm pores PLGA microspheres in 10 % PEG-PLLA-DA
10 mm
4 m
m
•PEG-DA: Polyethylene glycol diacrylate•PLGA : Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)•PDGF-BB: Platelet-derived growth factor •PEG-PLLA-DA: Poly (ethylene glycol)-co-(L-lactic acid) diacrylate
Distal layer
Porous Hydrogel
A B CC
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
NIR Imaging
Akar et al., Biomaterials 2015
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Invasion and Vascularization
Green: TissueRed: Blood vessels
Week 1 Week 3 Week 6
100 µm 100 µm 100 µm
100 µm100 µm100 µm
Blank
200 ngPDGF-
BB
Akar et al., Biomaterials 2015
Vessel density
Invasion Depth
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
• Hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tri-calcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramic particles were incorporated into the composite scaffolds • Varying weight ratios (70:30, 50:50,
30:70% HA: β-TCP).
• The presence of ceramic particles within scaffolds significantly extended the degradation time.
• HA and TCP ceramics to this scaffold system enhanced bone formation.
Ceramic Composites
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Porcine Model
10
m
m
17.5:7.5 % PEG-PLLA-DA:PEG-DA/Fibrin
• Polymer: Ceramic = 2:1 (w/w)
70:30%: HA:TCP
200 ng PDGF-BB
PMMA chamber
Cuff (adhesion)
Gradient scaffold
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Evaluation
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Modeling• Agent based model of
angiogenesis in porous scaffolds
• Results predicted experimental results for the influence of pore architecture
• Invasion depends
• Pore size
• Porosity
• Interconnectivity
• Size distribution
Mehdizadeh et al., Biomaterials 2013
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
3D Printing
Wang et al., Advanced Materials. 2015
• Precise control of internal and external architecture
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Large Animal Defect Model
• Porcine mandibular defect model
• Evaluating surgical transfer of functional engineered bone formed in the in vivo bioreactor
Imaging courtesy of John Decker
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Conclusions
• The in vivo bioreactor can result in vascularized bone of clinicalvolume and customized shape.
• A cell free approach requires optimization of structure, degradationkinetics and spatio-temporal release of growth factors.
• We are currently applying our approaches for engineeringvascularized bone in a large animal, clinically-translatable model of anin vivo bioreactor.
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Acknowledgements - Funding
Veterans Administration (5 I01 BX000418-06 ); NIH (5R01EB020604-02, 1R01AR061460-01);
AHA (Innovators Research Grant); NSF (IIS-1126771, CBET-1263994, EEC-1157041, DSES-1635661)
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Army Institute of Surgical Research
John Decker, D.M.D., M.S.
Erik Weitzel, M.D.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Ming-Huei Cheng, M.D.
Hui-Yi Hsiao, Ph.D.
Illinois Institute of Technology
Ali Cinar, Ph.D.
Elisabeth Hildt, Ph.D.
Georgia Papavasiliou, Ph.D.
Rice University
Tony Mikos, Ph.D.
Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Emanuel C. Opara, Ph.D.
Washington University in St. Louis
Mark Anastasio, Ph.D.
University of Maryland – College Park
John Fisher, Ph.D.
University of Chicago
Ronald Cohen, M.D.
University of Belgrade
Lada Zivcovic, Ph.D.
University of Los Andes
Juan Carlos Briceno, Ph.D.
University of Texas at San Antonio
Gabriela Romero, Ph.D.
Amina Qutub, Ph.D.
Chris Rathbone, Ph.D.
Acknowledgements - Collaborators
Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital
Jacob Brown
Brenda Carrillo
Madeleine Farrer
Maria Gonzalez Porras, Ph.D.
Christina Jones
Kelly Langert, Ph.D.
Paola Lerma
Samantha Mann
Meritxell Martinez
Favour Obuseh
Binita Shrestha, Ph.D.
Katerina Stojkova
Feipeng Yang
Acknowledgements - Lab