damping of coupled-bunch oscillations with sub-harmonic rf voltage?
DESCRIPTION
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?. H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014. Overview. Introduction Observations in time domain Mode analysis with excitation Possible ingredients for explanation? Summary and outlook. Overview. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?
H. Damerau
LIU-PS Working Group Meeting
4 March 2014
3
Overview
• Introduction
• Observations in time domain
• Mode analysis with excitation
• Possible ingredients for explanation?
• Summary and outlook
4
Overview
• Introduction
• Observations in time domain
• Mode analysis with excitation
• Possible ingredients for explanation?
• Summary and outlook
5
Introduction• 1970/71: Issues with longitudinal stability with
beam to ISR® ‘Clean oscillations […] are observed soon after transition
crossing [...]’® Coupled-bunch oscillations
• Cured by some additional RF voltage below the RF frequency® Only 10 kV (7%) of main 140 kV main RF voltage were
sufficient
® Today’s instability observations with LHC-type beams similar
2012: Does the old cure still work?
® Easy to test with 10 MHz spare cavity and existing beam control
® Main acceleration harmonic (h = 21) not dividable by 2
® Tried harmonic number range hsub = 6…21
D.
Bou
ssard
, J.
Gare
yte,
D.
Möh
l, P
AC
71,
pp
. 1073-1
074
Without RF/2 With RF/2
h = 20 h = 20
6Beam conditions and measurements
• High intensity 50 ns LHC-type beam:® 18 bunches in h = 21, Nb ≈ 1.95 · 1011 ppb, el ≈
0.5 eVs® Reduced longitudinal blow-up to force coupled-bunch
instability
® Spare cavity started 10 ms after crossing gtr, 50 ms rise time
® Kept on until end of acceleration
® Voltage ratio: VRF, sub/VRF,h=21 = 5% to 8%
Main RF, h = 21, VRF,h=21 = 200 kV
Additional RF, VRF,sub = 10 kV
gt
r
gt
r
7
Overview
• Introduction
• Observations in time domain
• Mode analysis with excitation
• Possible ingredients for explanation?
• Summary and outlook
8Very first observations (3 of 18 bunches)
No additional RF voltage Additional 10 kV at hsub = 17
® Significantly improved longitudinal stability with additional RF
Harmonic number scan• Harmonic number of additional voltage scanned:
hsub = 6…20h = 6
h = 16
h = 17
8 9 10
11
12
13
15
18
19
20
® hsub = 6…16: unstable
® hsub = 17…20: stable
9
10
Overview
• Introduction
• Observations in time domain
• Mode analysis with excitation
• Possible ingredients for explanation?
• Summary and outlook
Dipole oscillations excited by VRF,sub
• Data for mode spectra at C1700, 10 ms after full VRF,sub reached
• Growth rates faster than usual instability from impedance
® Clean single-mode coupled-bunch
oscillation
® Stable, nothing to analyze
11
Mode analysis with additional RF voltage
• Analysis of coupled-bunch oscillations excited by hsub = 6…16
• Mode spectra from time domain data immediately after additional cavity switched on
hsub = 6
hsub = 7
hsub = 14
hsub = 15
hsub = 16
…
® For all unstable cases, excited mode corresponds to frequency of additional cavity® nbatch ≈ 6/7 hsub
® No effect with additional cavity just tuned to hsub, but zero voltage program
12
13
Overview
• Introduction
• Observations in time domain
• Mode analysis with excitation
• Possible ingredients for explanation?
• Summary and outlook
Synchrotron frequency distributions
• Calculation of synchrotron frequency distributions for all buckets (at constant energy):1. Calculate normalized potential and identify buckets
2. Calculate normalized area and synchrotron frequency for set of trajectories of each bucket
Bucket area and synchrotron frequency of pure h = 21 bucket: AB0,h=21, wS0,h=21
f
14
Synchrotron frequency distributions
• Accelerating case, 30 synchronous phase:
Synchrotron frequency distributions without and with sub-harmonic RF
Accelerating bucket
hsub = 16
hsub = 17
Pure h = 21
f
® Increased spread compared to stationary buckets
15
Bucket-by-bucket spread, el ≈ 0.35 AB0
Un
stab
leS
tab
le
® Synchrotron frequency spreads of stable and unstable cases similar
® Decoupling of synchrotron frequency distributions?
16
Excited by phase loop?• Simple tracking model with single macro-particle
per bunch• Toy model of beam phase loop:
® Average of bunch phase error with respect to h = 21 bucket centers
® Simple moving average (length: ~ ¼ period of fs) loop filter
17
® Phase loop seems not perturbed, independent from hsub
hsub = 16
hsub = 17
Pure h = 21
Un
stab
leS
tab
lePhase jump as test excitation
Without additional RF
Preliminary
Excited by VRF,sub and impedances?
Bunch oscillation amplitudes
Mode oscillation amplitudes
500 kturns 500 kturns
Bu
nch
osc
illa
tion
am
pli
tud
e [
a.u
.]B
un
ch
osc
illa
tion
am
pli
tud
e [
a.u
.]
Mod
e o
scil
lati
on
am
pli
tud
e [
a.u
.]M
od
e o
scil
lati
on
am
pli
tud
e [
a.u
.]
• Preliminary tracking studies by M. Migliorati with impedance
hsu
b =
10
hsu
b =
17
18
® Again no conclusive difference between hsub < 17 or hsub ≥ 17
Preliminary
19
Overview
• Introduction
• Observations in time domain
• Mode analysis with excitation
• Possible ingredients for explanation?
• Summary and outlook
Summary of observations• Coupled-bunch oscillation stabilized with 5-10%
additional RF voltage at a sub-harmonic of the main RF system
• Strong coupled-bunch instability: hsub = 6…16
• Significant stabilization: hsub = 17…20
• Independent from relative phase of main to sub RF system
• Excited mode corresponds to additional RF harmonic
• Observations reproduced during several MDs• Stability seems to be a threshold effect between
hsub = 16 and 17
® How are coupled-bunch oscillations with VRF,sub excited?
® What is different between additional voltage at hsub
= 16 or 17?
20
Outlook
• In case of no conclusive explanation: beam measurements® Clarify dependence: longitudinal emittance, filling
pattern, etc.® Observe initial take-off of excited oscillations® Slightly detune additional cavity to exclude
impedance effects
® If understood, tentative implementation of damping mechanism with sub-harmonic RF• Flexible use of spare cavity for damping (if not needed
otherwise)® Possible with new 10 MHz matrix and spare cavity
selection or/and• Additional drive signal at h – 1 or h – 2 for each cavity• ~1 kV from each of the accelerating cavities® No need for 10 MHz spare cavity
21
22
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!