damping of coupled-bunch oscillations with sub-harmonic rf voltage?

22

Upload: shamara-amena

Post on 02-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?. H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014. Overview. Introduction Observations in time domain Mode analysis with excitation Possible ingredients for explanation? Summary and outlook. Overview. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?
Page 2: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

2

Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

H. Damerau

LIU-PS Working Group Meeting

4 March 2014

Page 3: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

3

Overview

• Introduction

• Observations in time domain

• Mode analysis with excitation

• Possible ingredients for explanation?

• Summary and outlook

Page 4: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

4

Overview

• Introduction

• Observations in time domain

• Mode analysis with excitation

• Possible ingredients for explanation?

• Summary and outlook

Page 5: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

5

Introduction• 1970/71: Issues with longitudinal stability with

beam to ISR® ‘Clean oscillations […] are observed soon after transition

crossing [...]’® Coupled-bunch oscillations

• Cured by some additional RF voltage below the RF frequency® Only 10 kV (7%) of main 140 kV main RF voltage were

sufficient

® Today’s instability observations with LHC-type beams similar

2012: Does the old cure still work?

® Easy to test with 10 MHz spare cavity and existing beam control

® Main acceleration harmonic (h = 21) not dividable by 2

® Tried harmonic number range hsub = 6…21

D.

Bou

ssard

, J.

Gare

yte,

D.

Möh

l, P

AC

71,

pp

. 1073-1

074

Without RF/2 With RF/2

h = 20 h = 20

Page 6: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

6Beam conditions and measurements

• High intensity 50 ns LHC-type beam:® 18 bunches in h = 21, Nb ≈ 1.95 · 1011 ppb, el ≈

0.5 eVs® Reduced longitudinal blow-up to force coupled-bunch

instability

® Spare cavity started 10 ms after crossing gtr, 50 ms rise time

® Kept on until end of acceleration

® Voltage ratio: VRF, sub/VRF,h=21 = 5% to 8%

Main RF, h = 21, VRF,h=21 = 200 kV

Additional RF, VRF,sub = 10 kV

gt

r

gt

r

Page 7: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

7

Overview

• Introduction

• Observations in time domain

• Mode analysis with excitation

• Possible ingredients for explanation?

• Summary and outlook

Page 8: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

8Very first observations (3 of 18 bunches)

No additional RF voltage Additional 10 kV at hsub = 17

® Significantly improved longitudinal stability with additional RF

Page 9: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Harmonic number scan• Harmonic number of additional voltage scanned:

hsub = 6…20h = 6

h = 16

h = 17

8 9 10

11

12

13

15

18

19

20

® hsub = 6…16: unstable

® hsub = 17…20: stable

9

Page 10: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

10

Overview

• Introduction

• Observations in time domain

• Mode analysis with excitation

• Possible ingredients for explanation?

• Summary and outlook

Page 11: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Dipole oscillations excited by VRF,sub

• Data for mode spectra at C1700, 10 ms after full VRF,sub reached

• Growth rates faster than usual instability from impedance

® Clean single-mode coupled-bunch

oscillation

® Stable, nothing to analyze

11

Page 12: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Mode analysis with additional RF voltage

• Analysis of coupled-bunch oscillations excited by hsub = 6…16

• Mode spectra from time domain data immediately after additional cavity switched on

hsub = 6

hsub = 7

hsub = 14

hsub = 15

hsub = 16

® For all unstable cases, excited mode corresponds to frequency of additional cavity® nbatch ≈ 6/7 hsub

® No effect with additional cavity just tuned to hsub, but zero voltage program

12

Page 13: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

13

Overview

• Introduction

• Observations in time domain

• Mode analysis with excitation

• Possible ingredients for explanation?

• Summary and outlook

Page 14: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Synchrotron frequency distributions

• Calculation of synchrotron frequency distributions for all buckets (at constant energy):1. Calculate normalized potential and identify buckets

2. Calculate normalized area and synchrotron frequency for set of trajectories of each bucket

Bucket area and synchrotron frequency of pure h = 21 bucket: AB0,h=21, wS0,h=21

f

14

Page 15: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Synchrotron frequency distributions

• Accelerating case, 30 synchronous phase:

Synchrotron frequency distributions without and with sub-harmonic RF

Accelerating bucket

hsub = 16

hsub = 17

Pure h = 21

f

® Increased spread compared to stationary buckets

15

Page 16: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Bucket-by-bucket spread, el ≈ 0.35 AB0

Un

stab

leS

tab

le

® Synchrotron frequency spreads of stable and unstable cases similar

® Decoupling of synchrotron frequency distributions?

16

Page 17: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Excited by phase loop?• Simple tracking model with single macro-particle

per bunch• Toy model of beam phase loop:

® Average of bunch phase error with respect to h = 21 bucket centers

® Simple moving average (length: ~ ¼ period of fs) loop filter

17

® Phase loop seems not perturbed, independent from hsub

hsub = 16

hsub = 17

Pure h = 21

Un

stab

leS

tab

lePhase jump as test excitation

Without additional RF

Preliminary

Page 18: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Excited by VRF,sub and impedances?

Bunch oscillation amplitudes

Mode oscillation amplitudes

500 kturns 500 kturns

Bu

nch

osc

illa

tion

am

pli

tud

e [

a.u

.]B

un

ch

osc

illa

tion

am

pli

tud

e [

a.u

.]

Mod

e o

scil

lati

on

am

pli

tud

e [

a.u

.]M

od

e o

scil

lati

on

am

pli

tud

e [

a.u

.]

• Preliminary tracking studies by M. Migliorati with impedance

hsu

b =

10

hsu

b =

17

18

® Again no conclusive difference between hsub < 17 or hsub ≥ 17

Preliminary

Page 19: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

19

Overview

• Introduction

• Observations in time domain

• Mode analysis with excitation

• Possible ingredients for explanation?

• Summary and outlook

Page 20: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Summary of observations• Coupled-bunch oscillation stabilized with 5-10%

additional RF voltage at a sub-harmonic of the main RF system

• Strong coupled-bunch instability: hsub = 6…16

• Significant stabilization: hsub = 17…20

• Independent from relative phase of main to sub RF system

• Excited mode corresponds to additional RF harmonic

• Observations reproduced during several MDs• Stability seems to be a threshold effect between

hsub = 16 and 17

® How are coupled-bunch oscillations with VRF,sub excited?

® What is different between additional voltage at hsub

= 16 or 17?

20

Page 21: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

Outlook

• In case of no conclusive explanation: beam measurements® Clarify dependence: longitudinal emittance, filling

pattern, etc.® Observe initial take-off of excited oscillations® Slightly detune additional cavity to exclude

impedance effects

® If understood, tentative implementation of damping mechanism with sub-harmonic RF• Flexible use of spare cavity for damping (if not needed

otherwise)® Possible with new 10 MHz matrix and spare cavity

selection or/and• Additional drive signal at h – 1 or h – 2 for each cavity• ~1 kV from each of the accelerating cavities® No need for 10 MHz spare cavity

21

Page 22: Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage?

22

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!