dana olijhoek and peter lund department of animal...
TRANSCRIPT
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Methane production by ruminantsDana Olijhoek and Peter LundDepartment of Animal ScienceAU-Foulum
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Outline
Methane emission numbers Methanogenesis: why? By who? Measurement techniques Mitigation strategies
2
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
CLIMATE CHANGE ??
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Global methane (CH4) trends
Increase in world population!14% of the increase was in only 23 years!!
4
-
NO GREENHOUSE GASSES !!
5
-18 C
-
CO2-EQ
1 kg Carbondioxide (CO2) = 1 kg CO2-eq. Fossile fuels
1 kg Methane (CH4) = 25 kg CO2-eq. Digestion Manure
1 kg Nitrous oxide (N2O) = 298 kg CO2-eq. N metabolism in manure and soil
6
(100-years timespan, IPCC)
-
THE COST OF PRODUCING MILK
7
02468
1012141618
Mio
. To
n C
O2e
CO2
Metan
Lattergas
Bligaard (2017)
-
COWS AND METHANE IS HOT
8
-
9
SPIN!!
-
10
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Global greenhouse gas sources
Sinks: Atmosphere: CH4 + OH CH3 + H2O ... (83%) Microbial uptake in soil (~5%)
Excess: 12%11
Moss et al., 2000
Natural wetlands; 37%
Rice growing; 16%
Oil industry; 14%
Livestock, enteric; 11%
Livestock, manure; 4%
Combustion; 6%
Garbage; 6%
Coal mines; 5% Sea and lakes; 1%
~70% anthropogenic source~30% natural source
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Enteric methane production Denmark
12Nielsen et al. 2014
Dairy cattle; 56.9
Non dairy cattle; 29.5
Sheep and goats; 1,2
Horses; 2,4
Swine; 9,8
Poultry; 0.04
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Comparison of countries
13
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Yield level is important
14
ad
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000
Output per cow, kg FPCM per year
kg C
O2-
eq. p
er k
g FP
CM
Gerber et al., 2011
Intensive
Multipurpose
Extensive
Kg ECM per cow
Kg
CO
2-eq
. per
kg
ECM
1 symbol = 1 country
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Emission of methane
12
1-5%
13% intestine89% via lungs
11% via rectum 95-99%
87% rumen
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Why is it a problem?
Global warming potential: 28 (IPCC, 2014) 2-12% loss of gross energy (feed)
CH4 GE value: 55 MJ/kg (e.g. glucose 15.6, fat 39.3)
16
Gross energy
Faecal energy
Digestible energy
Urine + methane energy
Metabolizable energy
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Why do cows produce CH4...?
17
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Hydrogen!
18
H2CO2 + 4H2 CH4 + 2H2O
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Why do cows produce CH4...?
Surplus H2 needs to be removed (excreted or oxidized) Inhibits fermentation processes
CHO fermentation:
C6H12O6 + 2H2O 2CH3COOH + 2CO2 + 4H2 acetic acid
C6H12O6 + 2H2 2CH3CH2COOH + 2H2O propionic acid
C6H12O6 CH3CH2CH2COOH + 2CO2 + 2H2 butyric acid
19
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Diversity in the rumen
Microbes (1012 microbes mL-1 in the rumen fluid)
Bacteria
Protozoa
Fungi
Archaea
Viruses
20
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Diversity in the rumen
Microbes
Bacteria
Protozoa
Fungi
Archaea
Viruses
Digest feed CHO (fibre, starch and sugar) and protein
Mainly fibre rich diets
Mainly methanogens
Do not contribute to any fermentation
Produce hydrogen
Protozoa foraging on organic material including fungi
21
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Microbial community
22
Feed Cow
Microbial diversity is more related to the cow than to the feed
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Animal variation
HIGH METHANE
LOW METHANE
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Where does H2 goes to?
24
CHO acetate CHO butyrate
CHO propionateBiohydrogenation of fatty acids
Acetogenebacteria
S-reducingbacteria MethanogensH2
N-reducing microbes AA VFA
Microbial matter
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Energy efficiency
The fermentation pathways differ in their energetic efficiency G is the difference in free energy with a chemical reaction, i.e. a reaction is
favourable when G is low G = Gibbs free energy change
25
Reaction G Substrate availability
CO2 + 4H2 CH4 + 2H2O -67.4 High
CO2 + 4H2 CH3COO- + H+ + 2H2O -8.8 High
SO42- + 4H2 + H+ HS- + 4H2O -84.4 Low
NO3- + H2 + 2H+ NO2- + 2H2O -130 Low
NO2- + 3H2 + 2H+ NH4+ + 2H2O -371 Low(Ungerfeld & Kohn, 2006)
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Nitrate (NO3-) as mitigation strategy
4 cows, Latin Square design Calcium nitrate (Bolifor CNF) Treatments with nitrate dose (g NO3-/kg DM):
Control: 0 Low: 5 Medium: 14 High: 21
26
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Nitrate study: results
27
26.5a 24.9a,b 23.0b
20.3c
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Control Low Medium High
CH4
prod
uctio
n (L
/kg
DMI)
Treatment
CH4
-6% -13% -23%
SEM 1.79P
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Nitrate study: results
Hemoglobin (Fe2+)
NO2- (absorbed from rumen)
Methemoglobin (Fe3+)
Clinical signs of methemoglobinemia: methemoglobin at 30-40% of Hb
28
Olijhoek et al., 2016
1.30a 1.31a1.50a 1.57b
0,00,20,40,60,81,01,21,41,61,8
Control Low Medium High
Met
hem
oglo
bin
(% o
f Hb)
Treatments
Methemoglobin (% of Hb)SEM 0.08P
-
Met-haemoglobin
1,25 1,25 1,49 1,58
30
70
0
20
40
60
80
100
Kontrol Lavt Medium Hjt Klinisk 1960
Met-HB (% of HB)
Control Low Medium High Clinical 1960exp
-
Nitrate i milk (mg/kg)
0,11
0,38
1,351,53
0,00,20,40,60,81,01,21,41,61,8
Kontrol Lavt Medium Hjt
P < 0,001
Control Low Medium High
-
0,11 0,38 1,35 1,53
50
150
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Kontrol Lavt Medium Hjt Drikkevand OstemlkControl Low Medium High Water Cheesemilk
NITRATE IN MILK (MG/KG)
-
N2O (256 X CO2)
Petersen et al. (2015)
N2O
co
nce
ntra
tion
(uL/
L)
Fee
dinta
ke(kg
DM
/ 15 min)
Control
Low
Medium
High
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Measurement techniques
33
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Measurement techniques
34
SF6 tracerOpen circuit chambers GreenFeed
http://www.google.dk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=8nloMss12XeJCM&tbnid=iFRi4jj5cvyhsM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.electronicproducts.com/Sensors_and_Transducers/Sensors/Researchers_develop_sensors_that_measure_cow_39_s_flatulence_and_other_bathroom_habits.aspx&ei=Nz08UpKNG8TF0QXCmYGgBQ&psig=AFQjCNEAuq7mJu9tySouuK8KM3whO1JNdg&ust=1379765937450323
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Respiration chambers
Considered as a reference method Animals are kept in closed chambers (slight under-pressure) Continuous air flow Gas flow rate (L/min) measured Gases measured: CO2, O2, CH4, H2, H2S
Concentration in inflow and outflow air
35
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Welfare is important
36
Feed
inta
ke (
kg fe
ed) D
UR
ING
EX
PER
IMEN
T
Feed intake (kg feed) BEFORE EXPERIMENT
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
GreenFeed
37
C-Lock
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
SF6 (sulphur hexafluoride) technique
38Storm et al. 2012
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Reducing (mitigating) methane emission
39
Mitigation strategies:1. Inhibit the methanogens specifically2. Reduce the substrate (H2) source3. Promote other H2 consuming processes/organisms4. Increase productivity5. Combination of 1-3
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Reducing (mitigating) methane emission
40
1. Inhibit the methanogens specifically: 2-bromoethanesulphonate (BES) Plant secondary metabolites: condensed tannins, essential oils Vaccination Long chained (unsaturated) fatty acids (see further later on)
Inhibitor sensitivity differs among methanogens!
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Reducing methane emission
41
2. Reduce the H2 source Inhibit H2 producing protozoa (defaunation) Antibiotic treatment:
E.g. monensin (ionophore): targets H2 producing Gram+ bacteria and protozoa
Works but controversial approach...!
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Reducing methane emission (1)3. Promote other H2 consuming processes
More dietary starch (concentrate) and less cellulose-rich roughage
Less H2 production Risk of increased lactate production (rumen acidosis)
42
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Reducing methane emission (2)
3. Promote other H2 consuming processes
Promote reductive acetogenesis: CO2 + 4H2 CH3COO- + H+ + 2H2O The process is thermodynamically less favorable than methanogenesis Acetogens have lower H2 affinity than methanogens An enigma why the process can dominate in e.g. Kangaroos
Dietary nitrate/sulphate (electron acceptors) addition
Works but problematic?!? Production/emission of N2O (greenhouse gas) Production of hydrogensulphide (H2S; toxic and odorous compound) and
nitrite (NO2- ; toxic)
43
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Reducing methane emission
4. Increase productivity of the animal By higher feed quality, management, genetics Less CH4/kg product (meat or milk) Dilution of maintenance
5. Dietary fat (combining strategies)
44
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Methane reduction through fat
45
Beauchemin (2007)
Methane reduced 5-6% per 1% fat addedPotential: 10-25% reduction
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Effects of dietary fat on CH4 production
Long-chained fatty acids are not fermented in the rumen; no substrate input for
the methanogens
Bio-hydrogenation (saturation) of unsaturated fatty acids is an alternative H2 sink
Can inhibit methanogens directly, especially medium-chained fatty acids
Reduces the number of protozoa (H2 producers)
Rapeseed plant
Rapeseed oil
Extruding processWhole seeds46
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Effects of dietary fat on CH4 production
But:
Unsaturated fatty acids are also toxic for cellulolytic bacteria reduced fibre
digestion!?!
Reduction in DMI?
What about milk composition and quality?!?
47
-
FAT X FORAGE COW
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Early grass-fat
Early grass+fat
Late grass-fat
Late grass+fat
Maize-fat
Maize+fat
CH4/kg DM
-5%
-3%
-5%
Brask (2013)
-
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
grass silage early
grass silage early +
rapeseed
grass silage late
grass silage late +
rapeseed
mais silage mais silage + rapeseed
Lite
r met
ane/
kg V
S
90 days
60 days
30 days
FAT X FORAGE BIOGAS POTENTIAL
+17%+17%
+9%
Mller (2013)
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
GHG from feed + CH4 from cow, kg CO2/kg ECM
-0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1
Grass ration
Maize ration
Growing Processing Transport LUC C in soil CH4 cow
+ 16 %
More from feed Less CH4 from cowDue to C in soil
Mogensen (2013)
-
FORAGE: CONCENTRATE RATIO
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
50:50 80:20
Methane L/d
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
50:50 80:20
Methane L/d
High quality GS Low quality GS
Hellwing (2012)51
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
GHG from feed + CH4 from cow, kg CO2/kg ECM
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
80% roughage
50% roughage
Growing Processing Transport LUC C in soil CH4 cow
+ 13%
More from feed Less from CH4 cow
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
WUNDERDRUGS
Nitrate
Oregano
Garlic
Essential oils
3 NitroOxyPropanol
Saponins
Tanins
Sea weed
.
25-32 % reduction
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
ORGANIC VS CONVENTIONAL
Kristensen (2017)
Chart1
72554591
53313241
51703192
12501434
40273551
konv
ko
CO2 eq per ha
Produktion-tilgang
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014DK
produktmlksvingplante
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstetmlksvinekdgplante
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosumkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvko
udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47LCA1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47
% i Dk87987492637570100DK-del1.0441.24462.16082.90721.83962.5650.29750.47
DK udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.041.242.162.911.842.570.300.47
1 mj=0,28 Kwh; 0,655 Co2 pr kwhenergiCO2 eq per enhed0.140.200.300.330.330.420.080.12
DK landbrugCO2 eq per enhed0.901.041.862.581.512.150.220.35
arealm2 per enhed1.782.374.139.1449.61.742.44
% DK709680877370100100
DK areal1.252.283.307.952.926.721.742.44
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha72554591563232415170319212501434
kologi% af konv pr ha63%58%62%115%
DKprodukt / ha80264395302712583425148857474098
kologi% af konv pr ha55%42%43%71%
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014DK
produktmlksvingplante
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
2015 DSproduktDK prouduktionmio kg sl180110
mio kg FU-enhed478648323701322015
ha596110783106410100949245317926322453179
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.330.504.410.030.330.031.260.0710.330.6410.97
kologi% af konv6%
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha72554591563232415170319212501434421235724168
produktionFU4786483237013220155799201
526923832356000
koko
scenarierudviklingudvikling
tilgang
produkt44ha26744075242344086219619147182632
UdledningGJ CO2 eq1.932.024.230.140.180.131.080.287.422.569.98
kologi% af konv26%
reduktion% af 2015reduktion% af 201545%400%96%400%53%400%85%400%72%400%9%
produktproduktionFU21401932227553116604954803
407223271765757
77%98%75%96%
Produktion-tilgang
LCA
DK-del
CO2 eq per kg
Areal-tilgang
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014Beregninger
produktmlksvingplanteDanmark
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47
% i Dk87987492637570100
DK udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.041.242.162.911.842.570.300.47
1 mj=0,28 Kwh; 0,655 Co2 pr kwhenergiCO2 eq per enhed0.140.20.30.330.330.420.080.12
DK landbrugCO2 eq per enhed0.901.041.862.581.512.150.220.35
0.75333333330.8225196850.6372602740.81556962030.51698630140.62719298250.51176470590.7446808511
arealm2 per enhed1.782.374.139.1449.61.742.44
% DK709680877370100100
DK areal1.252.283.307.952.926.721.742.44
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha725545915632324151703192125014344027.03015959073551.2975435062
kologi% af konv pr ha63%58%62%115%
DKprodukt / ha80264395302712583425148857474098
kologi% af konv pr ha55%42%43%71%
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014Beregninger
produktmlksvingplanteDanmark
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
areal2015Dk areal1000 ha651111615853811345224531792632
kologi% af konv7%
0.26538931920.62011173180.25071341210.04469273740.02160619650.04469273740.46229107220.2905027933
GJ=10-9 kgUdledningGJ CO2 eq4.720.513.460.030.270.031.420.079.880.6410.514027.03015959073551.2975435062
kologi% af konv6%
produktionFU5224719.10112359487869186138010061181507119056517241213115
571258818714411934126730356
ko47864832369.736842105313.157894736822015
scenarierudvikling
tilgang
areal44* arealha31844459132293297820819167162632
27%
UdledningGJ CO2 eq2.312.043.330.100.150.101.220.307.012.549.553657.65868477073551.2975435062
kologi% af konv27%
reduktion% af 20159%
arealproduktionFU2552166.934189411951476.793248941788740.920096854024299315476195620690852459
4503643.7274383518289831469346473149
% af 201579%98%76%96%
DK areal
Resultatopgrelse for heltidsbedrifter efter tid, bedriftstype, rsvrk og regnskabsposter
Enhed: -konvkoko stat
2015heltid1. POPULATION, ANTAL BEDRIFTER2. STIKPRVE, ANTAL BEDRIFTER3. JORDBRUGSAREAL, HA, PRIMOha i alt
Malkekvg, konventionel drift2860333154.4441584650977.154875576
Malkekvg, kologisk drift32682197.664417.6111724.470144078
Andet kvg, konventionel drift4423184.337260.654929.0721062287
Andet kvg, kologisk drift6615118778813507.3360926529
Svin, konventionel drift2520445165.6417312615195.701056733
Svin, kologisk drift3014163.348998496.7179658329
Fjerkr, konventionel drift24556147.736186.553345.6484268113
Pelsdyr, konventionel drift12615576.596466.5142209.608388902
Planteproduktion, konventionel drift2351306259608909897645.404720579
Planteproduktion, kologisk drift9718273.926568.346079.475797436
Potteplanter219994.91073.11581.9494929549
Vksthusgrntsager56184.7263.2388.0058769413
Frilandsgrntsager11141146.516261.523972.4831606425
Frugt og br1773133.85982.68819.4679308096
Planteskole1112724.92763.94074.5039638225
1767735.82453139179808
DK
i alt1767735.8
konv1664062.924531391.4741864625
ko103672.91798081.7343780294
DK2632947
1.4894459907
DK
Enhed: -mio kg
Mlk ab landmand i alt (mio. kg)Indvejet mlk p mejerier (mio. kg)kologisk mlk ab landmand (mio. kg)Konv
20155348.585269.91483.354786.56
9%
Slagtninger og produktion af svin efter tid, kategori og enhed
Enhed: -
Slagtninger og eksport af levende dyr (1.000 stk.)Gennemsnitlig slagtet vgt (kg.)
2015Svin, i alt30874..
Polte9450%
Ser533176.30%
Orner9176.40%
Slagtesvin1816484.31531225.285%
For producent192.50%
Kasserede36..
Slagtninger hos Producent2484.32023.20%
Eksport af levende svin i alt1213322.9277845.715%
konvko
DK1811094.11801014.110080
1%
gproduktion og produktionsformer efter tid og enhed
Enhed: -mio kgproduktion
Burg (mio kg)g fra fritgende hns (mio kg)Skrabeg (mio. kg)g fra volierehnsehold (mio. kg)kologiske g (mio. kg)
20153141301524%
Konv48
Slagtninger og produktion af fjerkr efter enhed, tid og kategori
Enhed: -1000 stk
Slagtninger af kyllingerSlagtninger af hnsSlagtninger af nderSlagtninger af gsSlagtninger af kalkuner
Slagtninger og eksport af levende dyr (1.000 stk.)201595681.411.839.186.7
korrigeret til mio g"172.22652
g + kyllunger konv220.22652mio kg
6%
Ren ko
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014DK
produktmlksvingplante
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47
% i Dk87987492637570100
DK udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.0441.24462.16082.90721.83962.5650.29750.47
1 mj=0,28 Kwh; 0,655 Co2 pr kwhenergiCO2 eq per enhed0.140.20.30.330.330.420.080.12
DK landbrugCO2 eq per enhed0.9041.04461.86082.57721.50962.1450.21750.35
arealm2 per enhed1.782.374.139.1449.61.742.44
% DK709680877370100100
DK areal1.2462.27523.3047.95182.926.721.742.44
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha7255.21669341894591.24472573845631.96125907993241.02718881265169.86301369863191.964285714312501434.4262295082
kologi% af konv pr ha0.6328197930.57547043380.61741757511.1475409836
DKprodukt / ha8025.68218298554395.21800281293026.63438256661257.57690082753424.65753424661488.09523809525747.12643678164098.3606557377
kologi% af konv pr ha0.54764416320.4155034080.43452380950.7131147541
2015 DSproduktDK prouduktionmio kg sl180110
mio kg FU-enhed47864832369.736842105313.157894736817215
ha596.3356109.89216782.961052631610.462894736850.22410.081023492452.5206526316179.43505473682631.95570736842453179
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.3265440.50454184.40960631580.03391052630.25965120.0321751.278750.070286885210.27455151580.640914211610.9154657274
kologi% af konv0.0587161581
produktionFU47860004830002369736.8421052613157.8947368421172000150005879310.34482759200819.672131148
52690002382894.736842111870006080130.01695873
arealDk areal1000 ha651111615853811345224531792632
kologi% af konv0.0680091185
GJ=10-9 kgUdledningGJ CO2 eq4.72314606740.50962816463.46365617430.02592821750.27400273970.02553571431.41750.07459016399.87830498150.635682260310.5139872418
kologi% af konv0.0604606269
produktionFU5224719.10112359487869.1983122361861380.1452784510060.6152066199181506.84931506811904.76190476196517241.37931035213114.754098361
5712588.299435831871440.76048507193411.611219836730356.13340871
ko
scenarierudvikling
tilgang
produkt7ha65111154332453278854320277182745
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.72314606740.50962816463.05815496370.103712870.23264383560.10214285710.9850.77889344268.99894486671.494377334410.4933222011
kologi% af konv0.14241222230.9613261095
produktproduktionFU5224719.10112359487869.1983122361643462.4697336640242.4608264795154109.58904109647619.04761904764528735.632183912225409.83606557
5712588.299435831683704.93056014201728.6366601446754145.46824948
1.08418832780.70657965061.07876276291.1108554339
Figurer
mlksvinfjerkrplantegennemsnit
systemkonvkokonvkokonvkokonvkokonvko
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha7255.21669341894591.24472573845631.96125907993241.02718881265169.86301369863191.964285714312501434.42622950824027.03015959073551.2975435062
7255.21669341895631.96125907995169.863013698612504027.0301595907
4591.24472573843241.02718881263191.96428571431434.42622950823551.2975435062
DK prouduktionmio kg sl180110
mio kg FU-enhed47864832369.736842105313.157894736822015
ha596.3356109.89216782.961052631610.462894736864.2410.081009492452.5366526316179.4350547368
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.3265440.50454184.40960631580.03391052630.3321120.0321751.261250.064262295110.32951231580.6348896214
42%79%43%5%3%5%12%10%
0.41885268810.79469215280.42689395020.05341168790.03215175990.05067810040.12210160180.1012180589
7255.21669341894591.24472573845631.96125907993241.02718881265169.86301369863191.964285714312501311.4754098361
konvkoKonvko
mlk725545917255.2166934189mlk4279
svin533132414591.2447257384svin435
fjerkr517031925631.9612590799fjerkr35
plante125014343241.0271888126plante1210
gennemsnit402735515169.8630136986
3191.9642857143
1250
1311.4754098361
Figurer
mlk
svin
fjerkr
plante
Metan+lattergas
Udledning af metan og lattergas ved konventionelt og kologisk jordbrug opdelt efter driftsgrene og i gennemsnit, kg CO2 eq pr ha
konv
ko
CO2 eq per ha
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
ORGANIC VS CONVENTIONAL
Kristensen (2017)
Chart1
1.21.044
1.271.2446
2.922.1608
3.162.9072
2.921.8396
3.422.565
0.4250.2975
0.470.47
LCA
DK-del
CO2 eq per kg
Produktion-tilgang
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014DK
produktmlksvingplante
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstetmlksvinekdgplante
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosumkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvko
udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47LCA1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47
% i Dk87987492637570100DK-del1.0441.24462.16082.90721.83962.5650.29750.47
DK udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.041.242.162.911.842.570.300.47
1 mj=0,28 Kwh; 0,655 Co2 pr kwhenergiCO2 eq per enhed0.140.200.300.330.330.420.080.12
DK landbrugCO2 eq per enhed0.901.041.862.581.512.150.220.35
arealm2 per enhed1.782.374.139.1449.61.742.44
% DK709680877370100100
DK areal1.252.283.307.952.926.721.742.44
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha72554591563232415170319212501434
kologi% af konv pr ha63%58%62%115%
DKprodukt / ha80264395302712583425148857474098
kologi% af konv pr ha55%42%43%71%
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014DK
produktmlksvingplante
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
2015 DSproduktDK prouduktionmio kg sl180110
mio kg FU-enhed478648323701322015
ha596110783106410100949245317926322453179
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.330.504.410.030.330.031.260.0710.330.6410.97
kologi% af konv6%
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha72554591563232415170319212501434421235724168
produktionFU4786483237013220155799201
526923832356000
koko
scenarierudviklingudvikling
tilgang
produkt44ha26744075242344086219619147182632
UdledningGJ CO2 eq1.932.024.230.140.180.131.080.287.422.569.98
kologi% af konv26%
reduktion% af 2015reduktion% af 201545%400%96%400%53%400%85%400%72%400%9%
produktproduktionFU21401932227553116604954803
407223271765757
77%98%75%96%
Produktion-tilgang
Areal-tilgang
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014Beregninger
produktmlksvingplanteDanmark
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47
% i Dk87987492637570100
DK udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.041.242.162.911.842.570.300.47
1 mj=0,28 Kwh; 0,655 Co2 pr kwhenergiCO2 eq per enhed0.140.20.30.330.330.420.080.12
DK landbrugCO2 eq per enhed0.901.041.862.581.512.150.220.35
0.75333333330.8225196850.6372602740.81556962030.51698630140.62719298250.51176470590.7446808511
arealm2 per enhed1.782.374.139.1449.61.742.44
% DK709680877370100100
DK areal1.252.283.307.952.926.721.742.44
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha725545915632324151703192125014344027.03015959073551.2975435062
kologi% af konv pr ha63%58%62%115%
DKprodukt / ha80264395302712583425148857474098
kologi% af konv pr ha55%42%43%71%
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014Beregninger
produktmlksvingplanteDanmark
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
areal2015Dk areal1000 ha651111615853811345224531792632
kologi% af konv7%
0.26538931920.62011173180.25071341210.04469273740.02160619650.04469273740.46229107220.2905027933
GJ=10-9 kgUdledningGJ CO2 eq4.720.513.460.030.270.031.420.079.880.6410.514027.03015959073551.2975435062
kologi% af konv6%
produktionFU5224719.10112359487869186138010061181507119056517241213115
571258818714411934126730356
ko47864832369.736842105313.157894736822015
scenarierudvikling
tilgang
areal44* arealha31844459132293297820819167162632
27%
UdledningGJ CO2 eq2.312.043.330.100.150.101.220.307.012.549.553657.65868477073551.2975435062
kologi% af konv27%
reduktion% af 20159%
arealproduktionFU2552166.934189411951476.793248941788740.920096854024299315476195620690852459
4503643.7274383518289831469346473149
% af 201579%98%76%96%
LCA
DK-del
CO2 eq per kg
DK areal
Resultatopgrelse for heltidsbedrifter efter tid, bedriftstype, rsvrk og regnskabsposter
Enhed: -konvkoko stat
2015heltid1. POPULATION, ANTAL BEDRIFTER2. STIKPRVE, ANTAL BEDRIFTER3. JORDBRUGSAREAL, HA, PRIMOha i alt
Malkekvg, konventionel drift2860333154.4441584650977.154875576
Malkekvg, kologisk drift32682197.664417.6111724.470144078
Andet kvg, konventionel drift4423184.337260.654929.0721062287
Andet kvg, kologisk drift6615118778813507.3360926529
Svin, konventionel drift2520445165.6417312615195.701056733
Svin, kologisk drift3014163.348998496.7179658329
Fjerkr, konventionel drift24556147.736186.553345.6484268113
Pelsdyr, konventionel drift12615576.596466.5142209.608388902
Planteproduktion, konventionel drift2351306259608909897645.404720579
Planteproduktion, kologisk drift9718273.926568.346079.475797436
Potteplanter219994.91073.11581.9494929549
Vksthusgrntsager56184.7263.2388.0058769413
Frilandsgrntsager11141146.516261.523972.4831606425
Frugt og br1773133.85982.68819.4679308096
Planteskole1112724.92763.94074.5039638225
1767735.82453139179808
DK
i alt1767735.8
konv1664062.924531391.4741864625
ko103672.91798081.7343780294
DK2632947
1.4894459907
DK
Enhed: -mio kg
Mlk ab landmand i alt (mio. kg)Indvejet mlk p mejerier (mio. kg)kologisk mlk ab landmand (mio. kg)Konv
20155348.585269.91483.354786.56
9%
Slagtninger og produktion af svin efter tid, kategori og enhed
Enhed: -
Slagtninger og eksport af levende dyr (1.000 stk.)Gennemsnitlig slagtet vgt (kg.)
2015Svin, i alt30874..
Polte9450%
Ser533176.30%
Orner9176.40%
Slagtesvin1816484.31531225.285%
For producent192.50%
Kasserede36..
Slagtninger hos Producent2484.32023.20%
Eksport af levende svin i alt1213322.9277845.715%
konvko
DK1811094.11801014.110080
1%
gproduktion og produktionsformer efter tid og enhed
Enhed: -mio kgproduktion
Burg (mio kg)g fra fritgende hns (mio kg)Skrabeg (mio. kg)g fra volierehnsehold (mio. kg)kologiske g (mio. kg)
20153141301524%
Konv48
Slagtninger og produktion af fjerkr efter enhed, tid og kategori
Enhed: -1000 stk
Slagtninger af kyllingerSlagtninger af hnsSlagtninger af nderSlagtninger af gsSlagtninger af kalkuner
Slagtninger og eksport af levende dyr (1.000 stk.)201595681.411.839.186.7
korrigeret til mio g"172.22652
g + kyllunger konv220.22652mio kg
6%
Ren ko
kildeKristensen et al 2011Dourmad et al 2014Leinonen et al 2012Knudsen et al 2014DK
produktmlksvingplante
enhed1 kg EKM leveret1 kg tilv (levende)1 kg g produceret1 kg ts - hstet
systemkonvkokonvkokonv-burkokonvkokonvkosum
udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.21.272.923.162.923.420.4250.47
% i Dk87987492637570100
DK udledningCO2 eq per enhed1.0441.24462.16082.90721.83962.5650.29750.47
1 mj=0,28 Kwh; 0,655 Co2 pr kwhenergiCO2 eq per enhed0.140.20.30.330.330.420.080.12
DK landbrugCO2 eq per enhed0.9041.04461.86082.57721.50962.1450.21750.35
arealm2 per enhed1.782.374.139.1449.61.742.44
% DK709680877370100100
DK areal1.2462.27523.3047.95182.926.721.742.44
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha7255.21669341894591.24472573845631.96125907993241.02718881265169.86301369863191.964285714312501434.4262295082
kologi% af konv pr ha0.6328197930.57547043380.61741757511.1475409836
DKprodukt / ha8025.68218298554395.21800281293026.63438256661257.57690082753424.65753424661488.09523809525747.12643678164098.3606557377
kologi% af konv pr ha0.54764416320.4155034080.43452380950.7131147541
2015 DSproduktDK prouduktionmio kg sl180110
mio kg FU-enhed47864832369.736842105313.157894736817215
ha596.3356109.89216782.961052631610.462894736850.22410.081023492452.5206526316179.43505473682631.95570736842453179
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.3265440.50454184.40960631580.03391052630.25965120.0321751.278750.070286885210.27455151580.640914211610.9154657274
kologi% af konv0.0587161581
produktionFU47860004830002369736.8421052613157.8947368421172000150005879310.34482759200819.672131148
52690002382894.736842111870006080130.01695873
arealDk areal1000 ha651111615853811345224531792632
kologi% af konv0.0680091185
GJ=10-9 kgUdledningGJ CO2 eq4.72314606740.50962816463.46365617430.02592821750.27400273970.02553571431.41750.07459016399.87830498150.635682260310.5139872418
kologi% af konv0.0604606269
produktionFU5224719.10112359487869.1983122361861380.1452784510060.6152066199181506.84931506811904.76190476196517241.37931035213114.754098361
5712588.299435831871440.76048507193411.611219836730356.13340871
ko
scenarierudvikling
tilgang
produkt7ha65111154332453278854320277182745
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.72314606740.50962816463.05815496370.103712870.23264383560.10214285710.9850.77889344268.99894486671.494377334410.4933222011
kologi% af konv0.14241222230.9613261095
produktproduktionFU5224719.10112359487869.1983122361643462.4697336640242.4608264795154109.58904109647619.04761904764528735.632183912225409.83606557
5712588.299435831683704.93056014201728.6366601446754145.46824948
1.08418832780.70657965061.07876276291.1108554339
Figurer
mlksvinfjerkrplantegennemsnit
systemkonvkokonvkokonvkokonvkokonvko
DK landbrugCO2 eq kg / ha7255.21669341894591.24472573845631.96125907993241.02718881265169.86301369863191.964285714312501434.42622950824027.03015959073551.2975435062
7255.21669341895631.96125907995169.863013698612504027.0301595907
4591.24472573843241.02718881263191.96428571431434.42622950823551.2975435062
DK prouduktionmio kg sl180110
mio kg FU-enhed47864832369.736842105313.157894736822015
ha596.3356109.89216782.961052631610.462894736864.2410.081009492452.5366526316179.4350547368
UdledningGJ CO2 eq4.3265440.50454184.40960631580.03391052630.3321120.0321751.261250.064262295110.32951231580.6348896214
42%79%43%5%3%5%12%10%
0.41885268810.79469215280.42689395020.05341168790.03215175990.05067810040.12210160180.1012180589
7255.21669341894591.24472573845631.96125907993241.02718881265169.86301369863191.964285714312501311.4754098361
konvkoKonvko
mlk725545917255.2166934189mlk4279
svin533132414591.2447257384svin435
fjerkr517031925631.9612590799fjerkr35
plante125014343241.0271888126plante1210
gennemsnit402735515169.8630136986
3191.9642857143
1250
1311.4754098361
Figurer
mlk
svin
fjerkr
plante
Andel af udledning af metan+lattergas i Danmark indenfor konventionelt og kologisk jordbrugopdelt efter driftsgrene
Udledning af metan og lattergas ved konventionelt og kologisk jordbrug opdelt efter driftsgrene og i gennemsnit, kg CO2 eq pr ha
konv
ko
Udledning af metan + lattergas ved konventionelt og kologisk jordbrug opdelt efter driftsgrene og i gennemsnit, kg CO2 eq pr ha
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
The future
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Same milk production in DK
Same # of cows in DK (12500 EKM)
Biogas
Manure
Management
Breeding
Feeding
Tech
nolo
gy
Change in methane in 2030 (% of 2015)
Lund & Kristensen (2017)
-
AARHUSUNIVERSITY
Methane Dana Olijhoek March 2017
Thank you for your attention!
57
Methane production by ruminantsOutlineCLIMATE CHANGE ??Global methane (CH4) trendsNo greenhouse gasses !!CO2-EQTHE COST OF PRODUCING MILKCOWS AND METHANE IS HOTSPIN!!Slide Number 10Global greenhouse gas sourcesEnteric methane production DenmarkComparison of countriesYield level is importantEmission of methaneWhy is it a problem?Why do cows produce CH4...?Hydrogen!Why do cows produce CH4...?Diversity in the rumenDiversity in the rumenMicrobial communityAnimal variationWhere does H2 goes to?Energy efficiencyNitrate (NO3-) as mitigation strategyNitrate study: resultsNitrate study: resultsSlide Number 29Slide Number 30Nitrate in milk (mg/kg)N2O (256 x CO2)Measurement techniquesMeasurement techniquesRespiration chambersWelfare is importantGreenFeedSF6 (sulphur hexafluoride) techniqueReducing (mitigating) methane emissionReducing (mitigating) methane emissionReducing methane emissionReducing methane emission (1)Reducing methane emission (2)Reducing methane emissionMethane reduction through fatEffects of dietary fat on CH4 productionEffects of dietary fat on CH4 productionFat x forage cowFat x forage biogas potentialGHG from feed + CH4 from cow, kg CO2/kg ECMFORAGE: CONCENTRATE RATIOGHG from feed + CH4 from cow, kg CO2/kg ECMWUNDERDRUGSORGANIC VS CONVENTIONALORGANIC VS CONVENTIONALThe futureThank you for your attention!