dara ghasimi phd candidate at tu delft civil engineering & geosciences

16
1 Challenge the future Potential Role of Thermophilic Digestion in Energy-Neutral Sewage Treatment Plants Adaptation Beyond Expectation” Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at TU Delft Civil Engineering & Geosciences Sanitary Engineering Section Promoter: Prof. Jules van Lier (TU Delft) Supervisor: Dr. ir. Merle de Kreuk (TU Delft) Supervisor: Dr. ir. Marcel Zandvoort (Waternet) 66 th Vakantiecursus, TU Delft, January 10, 2014

Upload: jake

Post on 14-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

66 th Vakantiecursus, TU Delft, January 10, 2014. Potential Role of Thermophilic Digestion in Energy-Neutral Sewage Treatment Plants “ Adaptation Beyond Expectation”. Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at TU Delft Civil Engineering & Geosciences Sanitary Engineering Section. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

1Challenge the future

 Potential Role of Thermophilic Digestion in Energy-Neutral Sewage Treatment Plants

“Adaptation Beyond Expectation”

 Dara Ghasimi

PhD candidate at TU Delft Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Sanitary Engineering Section

Promoter: Prof. Jules van Lier (TU Delft)Supervisor: Dr. ir. Merle de Kreuk (TU Delft)Supervisor: Dr. ir. Marcel Zandvoort (Waternet)

66th Vakantiecursus, TU Delft, January 10, 2014

Page 2: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

2Challenge the future

Page 3: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

3Challenge the future

Digestate sludge

• Reduction in aeration energy, less sludge, low transportation cost • Removal efficiency comparable to pre settling tank (removal of inert COD, TS..)• Onsite Energy Production: Energy Neutral STP @ Low Cost!

Expectation

Biogas (Renewable energy)

Application of Fine Sieve For STP Energy Optimization

Digester

Page 4: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

4Challenge the future

Automatic Methane Potential Test System (AMPTS)

Gas Volume Measuring DeviceCO2 Fixing BottlesWaterbath & Flasks

RT=30 days

I/S = 3 & 5 (based on VS)

Page 5: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

5Challenge the future

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4Thermophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose 1Cellulose 2Cellulose 3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4Thermophilic BMP Test Toilet Paper

Toilet Paper 1Toilet Paper 2Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Time (days)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion

(L /

g V

S)

Thermophilic BMP Test FSF

FSF 1FSF 2Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Thermophilic BMP Test Primary Sludge

Primary Sludge 1Primary Sludge 2Primary Sludge 3Average

Inoculum: Non-adapted Seed Sludge

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4Thermophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose 1Cellulose 2Cellulose 3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4Thermophilic BMP Test Toilet Paper

Toilet Paper 1Toilet Paper 2Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Time (days)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion

(L /

g V

S)

Thermophilic BMP Test FSF

FSF 1FSF 2Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Thermophilic BMP Test Primary Sludge

Primary Sludge 1Primary Sludge 2Primary Sludge 3Average

DRANCO- (GFT=VFY)

T-55°C

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Mesophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose1Cellulose2Cellulose3Aerage

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Mesophilic BMP Test Toilet paper

Toilet paper1Toilet paper2Toilet paper3Aerage

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

((L

/gV

S)

Mesophilic BMP Test FSF

FSF1FSF2FSF3Aerage

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Mesophilic BMP Test Primary sludge

Primary sludge1Primary sludge2Primary sludge3Average

HNP WWTP

M-35°C

Page 6: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

6Challenge the future

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Mesophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=3)

FSM1FSM2FSM3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=5)

FSM4FSM5Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test Toilet paper

Toilet paper1Toilet paper2Toilet paper3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose1Cellulose2Cellulose3Average

Inoculum: 8 months Adapted Seed Sludge

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=3)

FSM1FSM3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=5)

FSM4FSM6Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Toilet paper

Toilet paper1Toilet paper3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose1Cellulose2Cellulose3Average

M-35°C

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=3)

FSM1FSM3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=5)

FSM4FSM6Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Toilet paper

Toilet paper1Toilet paper3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose1Cellulose2Cellulose3Average

T-55°C

Page 7: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

7Challenge the future

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

Inoculum: 18 months Adapted Seed Sludge

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Mesophilic BMP Test(I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Mesophilic BMP Test(I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cu

mu

lati

ve

CH 4 p

rod

uct

ion

/(m

l/g

VS

ad

ded

) Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=3)

FSM1FSM3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=5)

FSM4FSM6Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Toilet paper

Toilet paper1Toilet paper3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose1Cellulose2Cellulose3Average

M-35°C T-55°C

T-55°C

M-35°C

Page 8: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

8Challenge the future

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/g

VS

adde

d)

Mesophilic BMP Test(I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

Inoculum: 18 months Adapted Seed Sludge

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/g

VS

adde

d)

Mesophilic BMP Test(I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400Mesophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/g

VS

adde

d)

Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=0.5)

FSF1FSF2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=1)

FSF3FSF4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=3)

FSF6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test (I/S=15)

FSF11FSF12

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cu

mu

lati

ve

CH 4 p

rod

uct

ion

/(m

l/g

VS

ad

ded

) Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=3)

FSM1FSM3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=5)

FSM4FSM6Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Toilet paper

Toilet paper1Toilet paper3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose1Cellulose2Cellulose3Average

M-35°C

T-55°C

M-35°C T-55°C

Page 9: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

9Challenge the future

Conclusion

Short Term Test: Mesophilic Digester More Efficient

Long Term Adaptation: Thermophilic Outcompetes Mesophilic

Thermophilic Digester:

High Loaded;

Less Footprint;

Efficient Digester For Onsite Energy Recovery From FSF!

Page 10: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

10Challenge the future

??? + !!!

Page 11: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

11Challenge the future

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

Time (day)

Cum

ulat

ive

CH

4 pro

duct

ion/

(ml/

gVS

adde

d)

Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=3)

FSM1FSM3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test FSM (I/S=5)

FSM4FSM6Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Toilet paper

Toilet paper1Toilet paper3Average

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

100

200

300

400Thermophilic BMP Test Cellulose

Cellulose1Cellulose2Cellulose3Average

Page 12: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

12Challenge the future

Page 13: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

13Challenge the future

•Dutch Water boards AND STPs agreed to have 20% reduction in Energy Consumption By 2030

•STPs: Energy Neutral or Surplus Energy

Why I AM DOING THIS RESEARCH?

Page 14: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

14Challenge the future

• Cellulose makes up about 30-50% of the SS in the sewage

• It mainly originates from the use of toilet paper (10-14 kg/person/year)

• Degradation of cellulose in the aeration tank is incomplete and requires aeration energy

• Cellulose separation efficiency in a primairy clarifier is low (up to 50%; poor settling property fibres)

Introduction

Page 15: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

15Challenge the future

Component FSFs

TS [g/kg] 100-250

VS[g/kg] 90-225

DS [%] 10-25

VS/TS [%] 90

COD [g/kg] 140-360

SCOD [g/kg] 14-36

TN [g/kg] 1400-1900

TP [g/kg] 700-760

(Physical-Chemical Characteristics)

Page 16: Dara Ghasimi PhD candidate at  TU Delft  Civil Engineering & Geosciences

16Challenge the future

TaxonomyT2-01-2013

[55°C]T2-03-2013

[55°C]M2-01-2013

[35°C]M2-03-2013

[35°C]

Firmicutes 49,0% 10,1% 4,8% 3,0%

Bacteroidetes 0,1% 0,9% 63,0% 69,6%

OP9 42,7% 85,5% 0,5% 0,4%

Chloroflexi 0,0% 0,0% 25,3% 20,7%

Archaea Euryarchaeota 1,8% 1,2% 0,3% 0,1%

Pyrosequencing Results of The Thermophilic and Mesophilic Sludge