dark matter and black holes over cosmic time tommaso treu
Post on 20-Dec-2015
220 views
TRANSCRIPT
A big dark surprise
• They contain supermassive black holes at their centers.
• The mass of the black hole is proportional to that of the stars in the galaxy and that of the dark matter around it! – MBH = 0.2% M* = 0.001% MDM
… are thought to form by mergers of spirals…
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Questions and puzzles
1. Do elliptical galaxies live in dark matter halos consistent with those predicted by the model?
2. Why is the mass of the black hole proportional to the mass of the stars and that of dark matter?
3. How do (stars) black holes and dark matter evolve over cosmic time?
Into the invisible
• How do we “see” dark matter?
– Gravitational lensing
• How do we “weigh” black holes?
– Reverberation mapping
What is Gravitational Lensing?…and can create multiple images
Image separation is a direct measurement of mass, luminous or dark!
A DOUBLE EINSTEIN RING:
GEOMETRY
OBSERVER
MAIN LENS(2 billion light yrs)
INNER RING(6 billion light yrs)
OUTER RING(11 billion light yrs)
Cosmic collisions and dark matter
QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Reverberation Mapping
Ring of gas with radius r
Gas along line of sight to observer will appear to respond with no delay
Gas that is furthest from observer will appear to have response delayed by 2r/c
Mean lag time is r/c, I.e radius / speed of light
Summary• Our standard cosmological model is undergoing rigorous
testing– We need to understand how galaxies and black holes form
• Things that appear to work include:– Galaxies live in dark matter halos. – Dark matter appears to be real although it would be good to know
what particle it is made of
• Things that we do not understand include:– Why are galaxies “isothermal”?– How do black holes know of their host galaxy and viceversa?– The most massive galaxies and their black holes appear to have
completed their evolution before the lower mass systems. In the model we naively expect the opposite.
• Is the model fundamentally wrong or is this because we do not understand the “gastrophysics”?