data exp. 6 ijatto

Upload: mohamad-annuar-assadat-husain

Post on 06-Apr-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    1/10

    RESULT

    DATA SHEET 1

    Gamma Scintillation Detector

    Counter:Source: 137Cs (1Ci)

    Voltage: 1000V

    Channel (LL) Counts Channel Counts0.2 1954 3.4 230.3 2354 3.5 130.4 19520.5 16030.6 1681

    0.7 17430.8 22700.9 26141.0 23231.1 19371.2 15791.3 14591.4 13631.5 13051.6 12561.7 1270

    1.8 13321.9 14172.0 11822.1 8292.2 4482.3 2702.4 2202.5 2072.6 2712.7 8082.8 39602.9 80973.0 58373.1 14083.2 1633.3 31

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    2/10

    Graph 1

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    5000

    5500

    6000

    6500

    7000

    7500

    8000

    8500

    9000

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

    Count/sample

    Channel number

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    3/10

    DATA SHEET 2

    Gamma Scintillation Detector

    Counter:

    Source: 60Co

    Voltage: 1000V

    Channel (LL) Counts Channel Counts0.2 536 3.4 4210.3 803 3.5 4600.4 658 3.6 4530.5 549 3.7 4890.6 549 3.8 4750.7 568 3.9 4820.8 592 4.0 442

    0.9 729 4.1 4231.0 888 4.2 4151.1 844 4.3 3541.2 676 4.4 3231.3 643 4.5 3211.4 563 4.6 3201.5 513 4.7 2901.6 473 4.8 3031.7 429 4.9 5311.8 422 5.0 9391.9 423 5.1 1159

    2.0 389 5.2 7422.1 369 5.3 3082.2 407 5.4 1292.3 413 5.5 2122.4 427 5.6 4912.5 373 5.7 8072.6 372 5.8 8832.7 419 5.9 5112.8 387 6.0 2162.9 368 6.1 85

    3.0 424 6.2 333.1 364 6.3 243.2 3943.3 426

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    4/10

    Graph 2

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    1100

    1200

    1300

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Count/channel

    Channel number

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    5/10

    DATA SHEET 3

    Gamma Scintillation Detector

    Counter:

    Source: unknown

    Voltage: 1000V

    Channel (LL) Counts Channel Counts0.2 4577 3.4 16580.3 4874 3.5 63230.4 4679 3.6 146390.5 4265 3.7 147130.6 4309 3.8 70620.7 3859 3.9 12970.8 4231 4.0 227

    0.9 5970 4.1 911.0 5643 4.2 781.1 4799 4.3 1021.2 3995 4.4 1031.3 3507 4.5 881.4 3339 4.6 731.5 3143 4.7 681.6 30591.7 29291.8 29271.9 2871

    2.0 28572.1 28812.2 30612.3 30142.4 29562.5 31892.6 32462.7 26682.8 18572.9 1138

    3.0 7263.1 5813.2 4923.3 679

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    6/10

    Graph 3

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    13000

    14000

    15000

    16000

    17000

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

    Count/Channel

    Channel Number

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    7/10

    Energy Calibration Curve

    Event (KeV) Disc. Setting (LL)(V)

    Photopeak 661.6 2.9

    Photopeak 1173.2 5.1

    Photopeak 1332.5 5.8

    Graph 4

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Energy(eV)

    Channel Number

    3.7

    830

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    8/10

    From data sheet 3 (unknown source), we know that the energy peak is at 3.7 (channel number).

    When we plot the point at energy calibration curve of the spectrometer, we got the energy of the

    unknown source which is 830 eV.

    Calculation of Energy Resolution of NaI(TI) Detector

    Using formula (1) from graph 1 the resolution, R is

    = 0.25

    = 8.62%

    From graph 2 there are two resolutions because of two peaks

    = 0.35 = 0.30

    = 6.86% = 5.17%

    From graph 3 the resolution, R is

    = 0.30

    = 8.12%

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    9/10

    Discussion

    In this experiment we will study the radioactive decay of a nucleus by detecting gamma rays

    emitted consequent to the decay. Gamma ray detection is a slightly complicated, multi-step

    process: the gamma ray enters a NaI(Tl) scintillator crystal where it produces a rapidly moving

    free electron that, in turn, loses its energy by excitation of the ions in its path as it travels through

    the crystal. This excitation energy is given off in various ways, one them being emission of

    visible light (fluorescence). Thus a single high energy gamma ray entering the scintillator

    produces a flash of low energy photons. These photons are directed to the photosensitive surface

    of a photomultiplier tube, where they eject electrons via the photoelectric effect. The electrons

    are collected in the photomultiplier and amplified to yield a current pulse, which is converted to

    a voltage pulse whose height is proportional to the number of photoelectrons and is thus

    proportional to the number of photons reaching the tube, which in turn is proportional to the

    initial energy of the fast electron.

    When a radioactive source is placed near the scintillator, the photomultiplier produces a series of

    pulses, each corresponding to the decay of a single nucleus. The amplitude of each pulse is

    related to the energy of the electron freed by the gamma ray. These pulses are studied using

    either a single- or multi-channel analyzer. A single channel analyzer (SCA) counts on the

    number of voltage pulses whose height falls within a given (adjustable) window of values, while

    a multi-channel analyzer (MCA) sorts the pulses according to height and the counts the number

    in each window to give a spectral (energy) distribution of the fast electrons. Figure 4 shows a

    typical MCA spectrum. In order to relate this spectrum to the nuclear decay, we need to

    understand how gamma rays interact with matter.When entering a crystal, gamma rays produce fast charged electrons by three different processes:

    the photoelectric effect, the Compton effect (Compton scattering) and pair production. It is these

    fast electrons, which give rise to scintillations, not the gamma ray. The observed spectral

    distribution will thus depend on the detailed interaction process of the gamma rays in the crystal.

    Consider a beam of mono-energetic gamma rays striking the scintillator. For our purposes the

    most important energy loss mechanism is the photoelectric effect. When a gamma ray strikes an

    ion in the crystal, it is absorbed and all of its energy is transferred to one of the bound electrons,

    which is freed and moves rapidly through the crystal. Since the energy of the gamma ray

    (typically about 0.5 MeV) is much greater than the binding energy of the electron of the ion

    (typically 10 to 100 eV), the energy of the freed electron can be considered equal to that of the

    incoming gamma. (Especially since the energy resolution of the detector is only about 10%.)

    Thus the photoelectric effect results in a peak, called the photopeak, in the photomultiplier

    spectrum at an energy equal to that of the incoming gamma ray.

  • 8/3/2019 Data Exp. 6 Ijatto

    10/10

    From graph 1 we got the peak value is at 2.9 (channel value) while from the graph 2 we got the

    peak value at 5.1 and 5.8. When we draw a graph of vs discriminator setting using this value

    we got a linear graph. This is known as the energy calibration curve of the spectrometer (see

    figure 6). We use this curve to find the gamma ray energy of an unknown source by reassuring

    is spectrum under the same condition. From the graph 3 which is using unknown source, we got

    the peak value at 3.7 (channel number). When we plot this value at graph 4, we got the energy is

    about 830 eV. According to the unknown sources peak energy is830 keV and based on the

    graph 4 it is the Mn54 and its half-life is 312.2

    A NaI(Tl) detector has an energy resolution of only about 10%. When a beam of mono-

    energetic gamma rays strikes the scintillator, there is a fluctuation from gamma ray to gamma ray

    in the height of the voltage pulse from the photomultiplier, which shows up as a broadening of

    the photopeak. The pulse height variation is chiefly due to statistical fluctuations in the number

    of electrons emitted at the cathode of the photomultiplier when a flash of photons arrives from

    the scintillator, but is also due to the occasional escape of electrons, X-rays or gamma rays fromthe crystal, all of which depend on how large the NaI crystal is. The fractional full width of a

    peak at half its maximum height (FWHM) is a convenient measure of the resolution of the

    instrument. From the calculation of the energy resolution, R at each graph we got the percent is

    below than 10% which means the ability to resolve two peaks that are fairly close together in

    energy is high for graph 1 and 3 and low for graph 2.

    Reference

    AN34: Experiments in Nuclear Science, 3rd Ed., EG & G Ortec. Experiment 1, Basic

    identifications in Electronic Measurement Systems, pp 1-7; Experiment 3, Gamma Spectroscopy

    Using NaI, pp 15-24; Linear and Logic Signals in EG & G Ortec NIM Instruments, pp159-160

    D.W. Preston & E.R. Dietz: The Art of Experimental Physics, Appendix B Counting and

    Sorting Particles: The Scintillation Counter, pp376-385

    general theory

    Serway, Moses and Moyer: Modern Physics, pp 431-432 (scintillator/photomultiplier), 389-

    392 (beta and gamma decay)

    Beiser: Concepts of Modern Physics, pp 443, 471-473 (gamma decay)

    Halliday: Introductory Nuclear Physics

    Siegbahn: Alpha, Beta and Gamma Ray Spectroscopy