data modelling and optimization report

Upload: varun-kumar

Post on 03-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    1/53

    2012-14

    BATCH

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING

    ACROSS VARIOUS SECTORS CASE BASED

    APPROACH

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION

    TERM - III

    SUBMITTED BY:

    GROUP C-9

    Suman Maity (12172)

    Suvarna Ashwini Nagesh (12173)

    Tahir Mushtaq H.M. (12174)

    Varun Kumar (12175)Shreetha T.S. (12176)

    Vinay A. Hamasagar (12175)

    SUBMITTED TO:

    Dr. Srilakshminarayan G.

    Assistant Professor (QM &OR),

    SDMIMD, Mysore

    PROJECT REPORT

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    2/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 1

    CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 3

    INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR PROGAMMING ................................................................................ 4

    NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED USES LP FOR BLENDING OF PETROLEM PRODUCTS................................................................................................................................................................ 7

    INTRODUCTION TO REFINERY INDUSTRY .............................................................................. 7

    ABOUT NRL...................................................................................................................................... 7

    PROBLEM DEFINITION .................................................................................................................. 8

    MATHAMETICAL FORMULATION .............................................................................................. 9

    SOLUTION......................................................................................................................................... 9

    SENSITIVITY REPORT:-............................................................................................................... 11

    RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 12

    NESTLE USES LP TO INVENT NEW FORMULA FOR INFANT NUTRITION ........................... 13

    INTRODUCTION TO FMCG.......................................................................................................... 13

    SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................. 13

    ABOUT NESTLE:............................................................................................................................ 14

    PROBLEM DEFINITION ................................................................................................................ 16

    MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION ............................................................................................ 16

    SOLUTION....................................................................................................................................... 17

    SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 18

    SENSITIVITY REPORT FOR FORMULATION 1 .................................................................... 18

    SENSITIVITY REPORT FOR FORMULATION 2 .................................................................... 18

    SENSITIVITY REPORT FOR FORMULATION 3 .................................................................... 19

    RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 19

    OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSION........................................................................................ 20

    ALLOCATING WORKERS TO MACHINES AND PROJECTS AT ACME FURNITURECOMPANY USING LP........................................................................................................................ 20

    INTRODUCTION TO MANUFACTURING SECTOR.................................................................. 20

    ABOUT ACME FURNITURE COMPANY .................................................................................... 20

    HOW ACME FURNITURE COMPANY USES LINEAR PROGRAMMING? ............................. 21

    PROBLEM DEFINITION ................................................................................................................ 22

    MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION ............................................................................................ 23

    SOLUTION....................................................................................................................................... 25

    SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 28

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    3/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 2

    INTERPRETATION......................................................................................................................... 37

    RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 37

    CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 38

    OPTIMUM PRODUCT MIX AT DONUT SHOP OF WELCOMHERITAGE GROUP.................... 38

    INTRODUCTION TO THE HOTEL INDUSTRY .......................................................................... 38

    CLASSIFICATION OF HOTELS.................................................................................................... 38

    MARKET SEGMENT.................................................................................................................. 40

    PROPERTY TYPE ....................................................................................................................... 40

    LEVEL OF SERVICES: ............................................................................................................... 41

    OWNERSHIP AND AFFILIATION:........................................................................................... 41

    AWARDING OF CLASS:................................................................................................................ 41

    THREE STAR CATEGORIES:.................................................................................................... 42

    FIVE STAR CATEGORIES:........................................................................................................ 43

    FIVE STAR DELUXE CATEGORIES:....................................................................................... 43

    ABOUT WELCOMHERITAGE GROUP........................................................................................ 43

    LP APPLIED IN WELCOMHERITAGE GROUP .......................................................................... 44

    HSBC- PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT USING LP MODEL ............................................................ 47

    INTRODUCTION TO BANKING INDUSTRY............................................................................. 47

    About HSBC ..................................................................................................................................... 48

    PORTFOLIO SELECTION FOR HSBC.......................................................................................... 48

    PROBLEM DEFINITION ................................................................................................................ 48

    RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 51

    CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 52

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    4/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 3

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    In this project we have tried to study the importance of Linear programming across varioussectors. The sectors that are covered are:

    1) Refinery Sector2) FMCG Sector3) Manufacturing Sector4) Hotel Industry5) Banking Sector

    The following companies have been included to study the use of Linear programming at therespective organisations. Hence it is a case based approach.

    1)Numaligarh Refinery Limited2) Nestle India Limited

    3) Acme Furniture Company4) WelcomHeritage Group5) HSBC Banking Plc.

    We have used linear programming to address various concerns of the firms mentioned abovewith the help of different kinds of problems like diet problem, blending problem, assignment

    problem, portfolio selection problem, etc.

    The use of linear programming in such diverse industries depicts the importance of theSimplex method and the importance of studying LP for the future managers.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    5/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 4

    INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR PROGAMMING

    Linear programming is a mathematical method adopted to identify the optimum outcome

    such as maximum profit or minimum cost in a given scenario. It is also known as linear

    optimization. Linear programming can also be termed as the process of taking various linear

    inequalities relating to some situation, and finding the "best" value obtainable under those

    conditions. A typical example would be taking the limitations of materials and labour, and

    then determining the "best" production levels for maximal profits under those conditions. It is

    mainly used in the cases where list of requirements listed as mutually relative in terms of

    linearity. More formally, linear programming is a technique for the optimization of

    a linear objective function, subject to linear equality and linear inequality constraints.

    Its feasible region is a convex polyhedron, which is a set defined as the intersection of

    finitely many half spaces, each of which is defined by a linear inequality. Its objective

    function is a real-valued affine function defined on this polyhedron. A linear

    programming algorithm finds a point in the polyhedron where this function has the smallest

    (or largest) value if such a point exists.

    This linear programming technique has been developed by Russian Economist Leonid

    Kantorovich in 1939. He developed this mathematical model during the time of World war(2) to plan expenditures and returns in order to reduce costs to the army and increase losses to

    the enemy. The method was kept secret until 1947 when George B. Dantzig published

    the simplex method and John von Neumann developed the theory ofduality as a linear

    optimization solution, and applied it in the field of game theory. Postwar, many industries

    found its use in their daily planning.

    Uses:

    Today, in "real life", linear programming is part of a very important area of mathematics

    called "optimization techniques". This field of study (or at least the applied results of it) are

    used every day in the organization and allocation of resources. Company management in

    terms of planning, production, transportation, technology and other issues relies more on LP.

    It is also used in micro economics. Certain special cases of linear programming, such

    as network flow problems and multi commodity flow problems are considered important

    enough to have generated much research on specialized algorithms for their solution. A

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_programming#Dualityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_programming#Duality
  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    6/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 5

    number of algorithms for other types of optimization problems work by solving LP problems

    as sub-problems.

    Solving under graphical method:

    The general process for solving linear-programming exercises is to graph the inequalities

    (called the "constraints") to form a walled-off area on the x, y-plane (called the "feasibility

    region"). Then you figure out the coordinates of the corners of this feasibility region (that is,

    you find the intersection points of the various pairs of lines), and test these corner points in

    the formula (called the "optimization equation") for which you're trying to find the highest or

    lowest value.

    It uses many methodologies for its calculations mainly

    Simplex method and Interior point method

    The simplex method: The simplex method has been the standard technique for solving a

    linear program since the 1940's. In brief, the simplex method passes from vertex to vertex on

    the boundary of the feasible polyhedron, repeatedly increasing the objective function until

    either an optimal solution is found, or it is established that no solution exists. In principle, the

    time required might be an exponential function of the number of variables, and this can

    happen in some contrived cases. In practice, however, the method is highly efficient,

    typically requiring a number of steps which is just a small multiple of the number of

    variables. Linear programs in thousands or even millions of variables are routinely solved

    using the simplex method on modern computers. Efficient, highly sophisticated

    implementations are available in the form of computer software packages.

    Interior-point methods: In 1979, Leonid Khaciyan presented the ellipsoid method,

    guaranteed to solve any linear program in a number of steps which is a polynomial function

    of the amount of data defining the linear program. Consequently, the ellipsoid method is

    faster than the simplex method in contrived cases where the simplex method performs poorly.

    In practice, however, the simplex method is far superior to the ellipsoid method. In 1984,

    Narendra Karmarkar introduced an interior-point method for linear programming, combining

    the desirable theoretical properties of the ellipsoid method and practical advantages of thesimplex method. Its success initiated an explosion in the development of interior-point

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    7/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 6

    methods. These do not pass from vertex to vertex, but pass only through the interior of the

    feasible region. Though this property is easy to state, the analysis of interior-point methods is

    a subtle subject which is much less easily understood than the behavior of the simplex

    method. Interior-point methods are now generally considered competitive with the simplex

    method in most, though not all, applications, and sophisticated software packages

    implementing them are now available. Whether they will ultimately replace the simplex

    method in industrial applications is not clear.

    Apart from there are several other types which are as follows:

    Integral problems Integer programming Path following algorithms etc.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    8/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 7

    NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED USES LP FOR

    BLENDING OF PETROLEM PRODUCTS

    INTRODUCTION TO REFINERY INDUSTRY

    A typical modern Petroleum Refinery comprises a variety of complex processes and plants

    depending upon the nature of crude oil being processed and the product slate. This study

    deals with the refining of crude oil and the production of various bulk petroleum products.

    Production and formulation of lubricating oils as also the manufacture of different petroleum

    based specialities becomes, by itself, a subject with extensive coverage.

    Current crude refining capacity estimated at 51.85 million tonne/annum is spread over 12

    refineries. Petroleum refining industry being entirely in the public sector, is close knit, with a

    high level of inter-refinery collaboration and information sharing through forum, such as the

    Oil Co-ordination Committee, the Centre for High Technology, inter-refinery meetings and

    others.

    ABOUT NRL

    Numaligarh Refinery Limited (NRL) is a subsidiary of M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation

    Limited (BPCL), a Central Public Sector Undertaking. NRL has an authorized capital of

    Rs.1000 cores and the paid up capital is Rs.735.63 cores.

    The Companys shareholding pattern as on 31-03-12 is given below:

    Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited - 61.65%

    Oil India Ltd. - 26.00%

    Government of Assam - 12.35%

    NRL has a refinery at Numaligarh in the District of Golaghat in Assam with a refining

    capacity of 3 MMTPA of crude oil.

    The refinery products like Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), High Speed Diesel (HSD),

    Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF), Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO) and Motor Spirit (MS) are

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    9/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 8

    marketed mainly through NRLs parent company, M/s BPCL, while some quantities are also

    marketed through M/s IOCL and M/s HPCL. The other products like Naphtha, Raw

    Petroleum Coke, Calcined Petroleum Coke and Sulphur are marketed directly by the

    company or with the help of M/s BPCL

    PROBLEM DEFINITION

    NRL basically refine three types of oil. Light distilled, middle distilled, and heavy ends.

    Under light distilled they produced LPG, Naphtha, and Motor spirit. Under middle distilled

    they produced Aviation turbine fuel, superior kerosene oil, and high speed diesel. From heavy

    end they produced raw petroleum coke, calcined petroleum coke, and sulfer. We are trying to

    solve which product NRL should produce in what quantity to get maximum profit by

    fulfilling the entire demand requirement. According to demand light distilled should not be

    refine no more than 10% of total weight, middle distilled should not be refine no more than

    75% and heavy end should not be more than 15%. Following table shows the information

    about minimum requirement of each product, cost price, selling price

    product Minimum

    requirement

    Selling price Cost price

    Light distilled

    LPG 96 1541 6000

    Naphta 19 16320 6000

    Motor spirit 185 30250 6000

    Medium distilled

    Aviation turbine fuel 132 74330 42138

    Super kerosene oil 270 74400 42138High speed diesel 1848 37400 42138

    Heavy end

    Raw petroleum coke 50 7400 11000

    Calcined petroleum co 44 33000 11000

    sulfer 4 4015 11000

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    10/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 9

    Requirement of all product quantity are thousand metric ton (TMT), Because of

    unavailability of cost prices we assume 3types of raw material is used for 3 different

    products. Like medium distilled is made from crude oil. Total requirement is 3000TMT.

    MATHAMETICAL FORMULATION

    Objective function= MAX Z =(1541-6000)LPG+(16320-6000)NAPHTA+(30250-

    6000)MOTOR SPIRIT+(74330-42138)ATF+(74400-42138)SKO+(37400-

    42138)HSD+(7400-11000)RPC+(33000-11000)CPC+(4015-11000)SULPHER

    Constraints:

    1) LPG>=96TMT2) NAPHTA>=19TMT3) MOTOR SPIRIT >=185TMT4) ATF>=132TMT5) SKO>=270TMT6) HSD>=1848TMT7) RPC>=50TMT8) CPC>=44TMT9) SULPHER>=4TMT10)LPG+NAPHTA+MS

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    11/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 10

    Constarin

    ts LHS

    SIG

    N RHS

    lpg 1 96000 >= 96000

    nafta 1 19000 >= 19000

    motor

    spirit 1 185000 >=

    18500

    0

    aviation

    turbine

    fuel 1 132000 >=

    13200

    0

    superior

    kerosine

    oil 1 270000 >=

    27000

    0

    high

    speeddisel 1 1848000 >=

    18480

    00

    raw

    petroleu

    m coke 1 50000 >= 50000

    calcined

    petroleu

    m coke 1 396000 >= 44000

    sulfer 1 4000 >= 4000

    min

    requirem

    ent of

    light

    distilled 1 1 1 300000

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    12/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 11

    SENSITIVITY REPORT:-

    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease

    $M$5 LPG 96000 0 1540 28709 1E+30

    $N$5 NAPHTA 19000 0 16319 13930 1E+30

    $O$5 MOTOR SPIRIT 185000 0 30249 1E+30 13930

    $P$5 AVIATION TURBINE FUEL 132000 0 60020 57 1E+30

    $Q$5 SUPERIOR KEROSINE OIL 270000 0 60077 1E+30 57

    $R$5 HIGH SPEED DISEL 1848000 0 37399 22678 1E+30

    $S$5 RAW PETROLEUM COKE 50000 0 7399 25600 1E+30

    $T$5 CANCLIEND PETROLEUM COKE 396000 0 32999 1E+30 25600

    $U$5 SULPHER 4000 0 4014 28985 1E+30

    Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease

    $V$10 LPG 96000 -28709 96000

    6.54836E-

    12 96000

    $V$11 NAPHTA 19000 -13930 19000

    6.54836E-

    12 19000

    $V$12 MOTOR SPIRIT 185000 0 185000

    6.54836E-

    12 1E+30

    $V$13 AVIATION TURBINE FUEL 132000 -57 132000

    3.49246E-

    10 132000

    $V$14 SUPERIOR KEROSINE OIL 270000 0 270000

    3.49246E-

    10 1E+30

    $V$15 HIGH SPEED DISEL 1848000 -22678 1848000

    3.49246E-

    10 1848000

    $V$16 RAW PETROLEUM COKE 50000 -25600 50000 352000 50000

    $V$17 CANCLIEND PETROLEUM COKE 396000 0 44000 352000 1E+30

    $V$18 SULPHER 4000 -28985 4000 352000 4000

    $V$19 MIN REQUIREMENT OF LIGHT DISTILLED 300000 -29828 03.49246E-

    10 0

    $V$20 MIN REQUIREMENT OF MEDIUM DISTILLED 2250000 0 0 0 1E+30

    $V$21 MIN REQUIREMENT OF HEAVY END 450000 -27078 0

    3.49246E-

    10 0

    $V$22 TOTAL REQUIREMENT 3000000 53032.5 3000000 1E+30

    6.54836E-

    11

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    13/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 12

    RESULTS

    After doing LPP now we can see that if NRL produced 96000 ton of LPG, 19000 ton of

    naptha,18500 ton of motor spirit,132000ton of ATF,270000 ton of SKO,1848000 ton of

    HSD,50000 ton of RPC,396000 ton of CPC and 40000 ton of sulphur, the organisation can

    make profit of1120,68,58,000.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    14/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 13

    NESTLE USES LP TO INVENT NEW FORMULA FOR

    INFANT NUTRITION

    INTRODUCTION TO FMCG

    Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) orconsumer packaged goods (CPG) are products

    that are sold quickly or fully used up over a short period of days, weeks, or months, and

    within one year, at relatively low cost. Examples include non-durable goods such as soft

    drinks, toiletries, and grocery items. Though the absolute profit made on FMCG products is

    relatively small, they generally sell in large quantities, so the cumulative profit on such

    products can be substantial.

    SCOPE

    This The Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) industry in India is one of the largest

    sectors in the country and over the years has been growing at a very steady pace. The sector

    consists of consumer non-durable products which broadly consists, personal care, household

    care and food & beverages. The Indian FMCG industry is largely classified as organised and

    unorganised. This sector is also buoyed by intense competition. Besides competition, thisindustry is also marked by a robust distribution network coupled with increasing influx of

    MNCs across the entire value chain sector continues to remain highly fragmented.

    FMCG have a short shelf life, either as a result of high consumer demand or because the

    product deteriorates rapidly. Some FMCGssuch as meat, fruits and vegetables, dairy

    products, and baked goodsare highly perishable. Other goods such as alcohol, toiletries,

    pre-packaged foods, soft drinks, and cleaning products have high turnoverrates. An excellent

    example is a newspaperevery day's newspaper carries different content, making one

    useless just one day later, necessitating a new purchase every day.

    The following are the main characteristics of FMCGs:

    From the consumers' perspective: Frequent purchase Low involvement (little or no effort to choose the item products with strong brand

    loyalty are exceptions to this rule)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_drinkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventory_turnoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_loyaltyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_loyaltyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_loyaltyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_loyaltyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventory_turnoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_drink
  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    15/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 14

    Low price From the marketers perspective:

    High volumes Low contribution margins Extensive distribution networks High stock turnover

    ABOUT NESTLE:

    Nestl's relationship with India dates back to 1912, when it began trading as The Nestl

    Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company (Export) Limited, importing and selling finished

    products in the Indian market.

    After India's independence in 1947, the economic policies of the Indian Government

    emphasised the need for local production. Nestl responded to India's aspirations by forming

    a company in India and set up its first factory in 1961 at Moga, Punjab, where the

    Government wanted Nestl to develop the milk economy. Progress in Moga required the

    introduction of Nestl's Agricultural Services to educate, advice and help the farmer in a

    variety of aspects. From increasing the milk yield of their cows through improved dairy

    farming methods, to irrigation, scientific crop management practices and helping with the

    procurement of bank loans.

    Nestl set up milk collection centres that would not only ensure prompt collection and pay

    fair prices, but also instil amongst the community, a confidence in the dairy business.Progress involved the creation of prosperity on an on-going and sustainable basis that has

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contribution_marginhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_(business)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_turnoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_turnoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_(business)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contribution_margin
  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    16/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 15

    resulted in not just the transformation of Moga into a prosperous and vibrant milk district

    today, but a thriving hub of industrial activity, as well.

    Nestl has been a partner in India's growth for over nine decades now and has built a veryspecial relationship of trust and commitment with the people of India. The Company's

    activities in India have facilitated direct and indirect employment and provides livelihood to

    about one million people including farmers, suppliers of packaging materials, services and

    other goods.

    The Company continuously focuses its efforts to better understand the changing lifestyles of

    India and anticipate consumer needs in order to provide Taste, Nutrition, Health and

    Wellness through its product offerings. The culture of innovation and renovation within the

    Company and access to the Nestl Group's proprietary technology/Brands expertise and the

    extensive centralized Research and Development facilities gives it a distinct advantage in

    these efforts. It helps the Company to create value that can be sustained over the long term by

    offering consumers a wide variety of high quality, safe food products at affordable prices.

    Nestl India manufactures products of truly international quality under internationally famous

    brand names such as NESCAF, MAGGI, MILKYBAR, KIT KAT, BAR-ONE,

    MILKMAID and NESTEA and in recent years the Company has also introduced products of

    daily consumption and use such as NESTL Milk, NESTL SLIM Milk, NESTL Dahi and

    NESTL Jeera Raita.

    FMCG major Nestle India had an 20.83 % increase in its net profit at Rs 278.93 crore for the

    fourth quarter ended December 31, 2012 on the back of good domestic and export

    performance. The company had posted a net profit of Rs 230.83 crore in the same period of

    2011. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the company posted a net profit of Rs 1,067.93crore, up 11.06 per cent from Rs 961.55 crore in 2011. Nestle employs 7,000 people in the

    country and its products are sold in 40 lakh outlets across India.

    Nestl India is a responsible organisation and facilitates initiatives that help to improve the

    quality of life in the communities where it operates.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    17/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 16

    PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Three chickpea-based infant food formulations were designed using a efficiency ratio, net

    protein ratio, and apparent protein digestibility was linear programming model to minimize

    total cost while meeting the also performed. Results showed no significant protein efficienty

    ratio or net FAO/ WHO requirements for lysine and sulfur amino acids. Each protein ratio

    differences between the casein control and any of the formulation was prepared by cooking

    and blending the ingredients into a experimental formulations tested. Although they were

    produced at viscous paste that was later drum-dried and analyzed for chemical minimum cost,

    all products complied with the infant food specifications composition. Biological evaluation

    of protein quality by means of protein established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.

    MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION

    Three types of restrictions were set upon the variables: 1) minimum and maximum quantities

    of ingredients to be included, 2) amino acid supply of each ingredient, and 3) material

    balance. The objective function established was: MinZ= Ywhere Z is the cost per kilogram of

    each formulation,

    Ingredients cost Lysine Cytine

    Rice 34 .59 .52

    Chickpea 40 1.46 .46

    Methionine 1140 95

    Soybean meal 56 3.19 1.46

    Table presents the list of variables, ingredients, and costs at the time of formulation.For formulations 1 and 2, the only restriction imposed on the linear programming model was

    X2 > 0.7, and the latter included banana and soybean meal. Restrictions on formulation 3

    were a maximum of 50% chickpea (X2 < 0.5) and a minimum of 10%,soybean meal (X3 >

    0.1).

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    18/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 17

    SOLUTION

    FORMULATION

    1

    RICE CHICKPEA MYTHIONINE

    Cost 0.297862 0.7 0.002138019

    objective minimum cost 34.5 40 1140 40.71357959

    Constraint

    Ingredient limits 1 0.7 >= 0.7

    Sulfur amino acid

    requirements 0.52 0.46 95 0.68 >= 0.68

    Lysine requirements 0.59 1.46 1.197738569 >= 1.06

    overall limit 1 1 1 1 = 1

    FORMULATION

    2

    RICE CHICKPEA MYTHIONINE

    Cost 0.00582 0.99079869 0.003381117

    Objective 34.5 40 1140 43.68721748

    Constraint

    Ingredient limits 1 0.990798688 >= 0.7

    Sulfur amino acid

    requirements 0.52 0.46 95 0.78 >= 0.78

    Lysine requirements 0.59 1.46 1.45 >= 1.45

    overall limit 1 1 1 1 = 1

    FORMULATION

    3

    RICE CHICKPEA MYTHIONINE

    SOYABEAN

    MEAL

    0.9 0 0 0.1

    34.5 40 1140 56 36.65

    Constrain

    Ingredient limits 1 0 =

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    19/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 18

    Sulfur amino acid

    requirements 0.52 0.46 95 1.46 0.614 >=

    Lysine requirements 0.59 1.46 3.19 0.85 >=

    overall limit 1 1 1 1 1 =

    SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

    SENSITIVITY REPORT FOR FORMULATION 1

    Variable Cells

    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease

    $D$6 cost RICE 0.297861981 0 34.5 6.198117199 1E+30

    $E$6 cost CHICKPEA 0.7 0 40 1E+30 6.202053345

    $F$6 cost MYTHIONINE 0.002138019 0 1140 1E+30 1105.5

    Constraints

    Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease

    $G$12 overall limit 1 28.41553768 1 0.388461538 0.232177342

    $G$9 Ingredient limits 0.7 6.202053345 0.7 0.297672943 0.158388407

    $G$10 Sulfur amino acid requirements 0.68 11.70088908 0.68 22.05684746 0.202

    $G$11 Lysine requirements 1.197738569 0 1.06 0.137738569 1E+30

    SENSITIVITY REPORT FOR FORMULATION 2

    Variable Cells

    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease

    $D$17 cost RICE 0.005820195 0 34.5 6.198117199 1E+30

    $E$17 cost CHICKPEA 0.990798688 0 40 1E+30 6.202053345

    $F$17 cost MYTHIONINE 0.003381117 0 1140 1E+30 1109.229885

    Constraints

    Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    20/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 19

    $G$20 Ingredient limits 0.990798688 0 0.7 0.290798688 1E+30

    $G$21 Sulfur amino acid requirements 0.78 11.74542551 0.78 0.327534247 0.319310345

    $G$22 Lysine requirements 1.45 7.131868426 1.45 0.005058176 0.252885902

    $G$23 overall limit 1 24.18457636 1 0.426274041 0.003447729

    SENSITIVITY REPORT FOR FORMULATION 3

    Variable Cells

    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease

    $D$28 RICE 0.9 0 34.5 5.5 1E+30

    $E$28 CHICKPEA 0 5.5 40 1E+30 5.5

    $F$28 MYTHIONINE 0 1105.5 1140 1E+30 1105.5

    $G$28 SOYABEAN MEAL 0.1 0 56 1E+30 21.5

    Constraints

    Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable

    Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease

    $H$31 Ingredient limits = 0 0 0.5 1E+30 0.5

    $H$32 Ingredient limits = 0.1 21.5 0.1 0.9

    4.27009E-

    17

    $H$33 Sulfur amino acid requirements = 0.614 0 0.54 0.074 1E+30

    $H$34 Lysine requirements = 0.85 0 0.85

    1.11022E-

    16 1E+30

    $H$35 overall limit = 1 34.5 1 1E+30

    1.88173E-

    16

    RESULTS

    Gerber's Mixed Cereal gave the same results as for PER. Protein apparent digestibility was

    higher for the ANRC casein diet at 86%, and nearly the same for formulations 1, 2, and 3.

    They are close to those of Gerber's High Protein Cereal, which is manufactured in the same

    manner as the experimental formulations. Results from this experiment confirm the similarity

    in nutritive value of the formulated products. Formulation 2 showed a higher nutritive value

    with respect to one of the commercial products because of improved essential amino acid

    complementation and supplementation.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    21/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 20

    OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSION

    Chemical analysis and biological evaluation of the linear programming model formulated

    products confirmed their highly nutritive value in agreement with infant food specifications

    outline. It was also established that the application of optimization methodologies, such as

    linear programming, offer a special versatility as far as formulation of low-cost, highly

    nutritive food products. In particular, underutilized chickpea resources available in many

    parts of the world have been successfully used as the main ingredient to formulate infant

    cereals to improve nutrition.

    ALLOCATING WORKERS TO MACHINES AND PROJECTS

    AT ACME FURNITURE COMPANY USING LP

    INTRODUCTION TO MANUFACTURING SECTOR

    Manufacturing is the production of goods for use or sale using labour and machines, tools,

    chemical and biological processing, or formulation. The term may refer to a range of human

    activity, from handicraft to high tech, but is most commonly applied to industrial production,

    in which raw materials are transformed into finished goods on a large scale. Such finished

    goods may be used for manufacturing other, more complex products, such as aircraft,

    household appliances or automobiles, or sold to wholesalers, who in turn sell them

    to retailers, who then sell them to end usersthe "Consumers".

    Modern manufacturing includes all intermediate processes required for the production and

    integration of a product's components. Some industries, such as

    semiconductor and steel manufacturers use the term fabrication instead.

    The manufacturing sector is closely connected with engineering and industrial design.

    Examples of major manufacturers in North America include General Motors

    Corporation, General Electric, and Pfizer. Examples in Europe include Volkswagen

    Group, Siemens, and Michelin. Examples in Asia include Toyota, Samsung, and Bridgestone.

    ABOUT ACME FURNITURE COMPANY

    ACME started doing business in Los Angeles, California in 1985. Today they have six

    branches located in New York City, New Jersey, Atlanta, Miami, Dallas, and San Franscico.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    22/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 21

    From the beginning they have set out to provide our customers with service, value and

    quality.

    Service

    In their new 400,000 square foot fully racked warehouse in Los Angeles, they can ship out

    most orders within 48 hours. In most instances they can ship 90% of the items requested. This

    is possible due to the fact that they maintain a 12 million dollar inventory at all times. They

    also offer their customers a traffic department that offers the most competitive freight rates

    available.

    Value

    Over the years ACME has been working with many of the same factories in Malaysia,

    Taiwan, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Brazil and of course China. Because of their long-term

    relationships with these factories, they have been able to purchase their products at the most

    competitive prices in the industry.

    Quality

    Nothing is more important than quality. That is why ACME maintains its own quality control

    personnel in every country in which they do business. Every item must meet their exactstandards. Nothing less will do.

    Integrity

    Besides the three branches they also maintain showrooms in Tupelo, Mississippi, High Point,

    North Carolina, San Francisco, California and their newest showroom in Las Vegas, Nevada.

    HOW ACME FURNITURE COMPANY USES LINEAR

    PROGRAMMING?

    At ACME Furniture Company, they use linear programming to determine which employee to

    allocate to which machining centre and also to determine the allocation of a worker on a

    particular job.

    They basic model used here is the assignment problem where one employee has to be allotted

    to one machining centre based on the time he takes to complete the task. In the case of

    assigning a particular employee to a particular project the same assignment model is used.They allocate the employee on the basis of minimizing the cost to the company.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    23/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 22

    PROBLEM DEFINITION

    PROBLEM -1:

    Six individuals are to work on six different machines at the ACME Furniture Company. The

    machines used shape, surface, and drill to make a finished wood component. The work will

    be sequential so that a finished component is produced at the end of the manufacturing

    process. All individuals are skilled on all machines, but each worker is not equally skilled on

    each machine.

    Table1: Average time (in seconds) required to complete a task by each worked

    PROBLEM2

    The same six individuals are to work on six different projects which involve all the tasks

    mentioned in the table above. The allocation is based on minimizing the cost. All individuals

    are skilled on all machines, but each worker is not equally skilled on each machine and

    depending upon the complexity of a job demand unique cost for working on each project.

    Project

    Individual

    Project

    1

    Project

    2

    Project

    3

    Project

    4

    Project

    5

    Project

    6

    Worker 1 871 1466 1276 1091 1417 840

    Worker 2 902 758 1185 1302 1283 1123

    Worker 3 807 1460 836 1231 1368 1083

    Worker 4 751 900 1189 820 1412 1356

    Worker 5 794 891 1142 790 917 1099

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    24/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 23

    Worker 5 1153 1428 707 1488 1220 942

    Table - 2: Labour Wage (in $) to be paid to complete a project by each worker

    MATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONPROBLEM 1

    The problem can be formulated as given below

    Xij = Flow on arc from node denoting worker i to node denoting machine j

    Where

    i = Worker 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

    j = Surfacer, Lathe, Sander 1, Router, Sander 2 and Drill Machine

    Objective Function

    Minimize the total time spent for manufacturing

    Z = 13X1S + 22X1L + 19X1S1 + 21X1R+ 16X1S2 + 20X1D +

    18X2S + 17X2L + 24X2S1 + 18X2R+ 22X2S2 + 27X2D +

    20X3S + 22X3L + 23X3S1 + 24X3R+ 17X3S2 + 31X3D +

    14X4S + 19X4L + 13X4S1 + 30X4R+ 23X4S2 + 22X4D +

    21X5S + 14X5L + 17X5S1 + 25X5R+ 15X5S2 + 23X5D +

    17X6S + 23X6L + 18X6S1 + 20X6R+ 16X6S2 + 24X6D +

    Subject to the constraints

    -X1S - X1L - X1S1 - X1R- X1S2 - X1D = -1 (Worker 1 Availability)

    -X2S - X2L- X2S1 - X2R- X2S2 - X2D = -1 (Worker 2 Availability)

    -X3S - X3L - X3S1 - X3R- X3S2 - X3D = -1 (Worker 3 Availability)

    - X4S - X4L - X4S1 - X4R- X4S2 - X4D = -1 (Worker 4 Availability)

    - X5S - X5L - X5S1 - X5R- X5S2 - X5D = -1 (Worker 5 Availability)

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    25/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 24

    - X6S - X6L - X6S1 - X6R- X6S2 - X6D = -1 (Worker 6 Availability)

    X1S +X2S + X3S +X4S +X5S +X6S = 1 (Surfacer Availability)

    X1L+X2L+ X3L +X4L +X5L +X6L = 1 (Lathe Availability)

    X1S1 +X2S1 + X3S1 +X4S1 +X5S1 +X6S1 = 1 (Sander1 Availability)

    X1R+X2R+ X3R+X4R+X5R+X6R= 1 (Router Availability)

    X1S2 +X2S2 + X3S2 +X4S2+X5S2 +X6S2 = 1 (Sander2 Availability)

    X1D +X2D + X3D +X4D +X5D +X6D = 1 (Drill Availability)

    All variables >=0 (Non-negativity constraints)

    PROBLEM 2

    The problem can be formulated as given below

    Xij = Flow on arc from node denoting worker i to node denoting project j

    Where

    i = Worker 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

    j = Project 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

    Objective Function

    Minimize the total time spent for manufacturing

    Z = 871X1S + 1466X1L + 1276X1S1 + 1091X1R+ 1417X1S2 + 840X1D +

    902X2S + 758X2L + 1185X2S1 + 1302X2R+ 1283X2S2 + 1123X2D +

    807X3S + 1460X3L + 836X3S1 + 1231X3R+ 1368X3S2 + 1083X3D +

    751X4S + 900X4L + 1189X4S1 + 820X4R+ 1412X4S2 + 1356X4D +

    794X5S + 891X5L + 1142X5S1 + 790X5R+ 917X5S2 + 1099X5D +

    1153X6S + 1428X6L + 707X6S1 + 1468X6R+ 1220X6S2 + 942X6D +

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    26/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 25

    Subject to the constraints

    -X1S - X1L - X1S1 - X1R- X1S2 - X1D = -1 (Worker 1 Availability)

    -X2S - X2L- X2S1 - X2R- X2S2 - X2D = -1 (Worker 2 Availability)

    -X3S - X3L - X3S1 - X3R- X3S2 - X3D = -1 (Worker 3 Availability)

    - X4S - X4L - X4S1 - X4R- X4S2 - X4D = -1 (Worker 4 Availability)

    - X5S - X5L - X5S1 - X5R- X5S2 - X5D = -1 (Worker 5 Availability)

    - X6S - X6L - X6S1 - X6R- X6S2 - X6D = -1 (Worker 6 Availability)

    X1S +X2S + X3S +X4S +X5S +X6S = 1 (Project 1 Availability)

    X1L+X2L+ X3L +X4L +X5L +X6L = 1 (Project 2 Availability)

    X1S1 +X2S1 + X3S1 +X4S1 +X5S1 +X6S1 = 1 (Project 3 Availability)

    X1R+X2R+ X3R+X4R+X5R+X6R= 1 (Project 4 Availability)

    X1S2 +X2S2 + X3S2 +X4S2+X5S2 +X6S2 = 1 (Project 5 Availability)

    X1D +X2D + X3D +X4D +X5D +X6D = 1 (Project 6 Availability)

    All variables >=0 (Non-negativity constraints)

    SOLUTION

    PROBLEM 1:

    Machine

    Individual Surfacer Lathe Sander 1 Router Sander 2 Drill Flow inWorker 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

    Worker 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

    Worker 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

    Worker 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

    Worker 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

    Worker 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

    Flow out 1 1 1 1 1 1

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    27/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 26

    Project

    Individual Surfacer Lathe Sander 1 Router Sander 2 Drill

    Worker 1 13 22 19 21 16 20Worker 2 18 17 24 18 22 27

    Worker 3 20 22 23 24 17 31

    Worker 4 14 19 13 30 23 22

    Worker 5 21 14 17 25 15 23

    Worker 5 17 23 18 20 16 24

    Project

    Cost 99

    Flow In

    Flow

    Out

    Net

    Flow Sign RHS

    Surfacer 1 -1 = -1

    Lathe 1 -1 = -1

    Sander

    1 1 -1 = -1

    Router 1 -1 = -1

    Sander

    2 1 -1 = -1

    Drill 1 -1 = -1

    Worker

    1 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    2 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    3 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    4 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    5 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    6 1 1 = 1

    PROBLEM 2:

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    28/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 27

    Project

    Individual

    Project

    1

    Project

    2

    Project

    3

    Project

    4

    Project

    5

    Project

    6 Flow in

    Worker 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

    Worker 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

    Worker 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

    Worker 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

    Worker 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

    Worker 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

    Flow out 1 1 1 1 1 1

    Project

    Individual

    Project

    1

    Project

    2

    Project

    3

    Project

    4

    Project

    5

    Project

    6

    Worker 1 871 1466 1276 1091 1417 840

    Worker 2 902 758 1185 1302 1283 1123

    Worker 3 807 1460 836 1231 1368 1083

    Worker 4 751 900 1189 820 1412 1356

    Worker 5 794 891 1142 790 917 1099

    Worker 5 1153 1428 707 1488 1220 942

    Project

    Cost 4849

    Flow In

    Flow

    Out

    Net

    Flow Sign RHSProject

    1 1 -1 = -1

    Project

    2 1 -1 = -1

    Project

    3 1 -1 = -1

    Project

    4 1 -1 = -1

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    29/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 28

    Project

    5 1 -1 = -1

    Project

    6 1 -1 = -1Worker

    1 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    2 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    3 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    4 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    5 1 1 = 1

    Worker

    6 1 1 = 1

    SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

    PROBLEM 1:

    Microsoft Excel 14.0 Answer Report

    Worksheet: [Book1]Sheet1

    Report Created: 12/03/2013 20:32:32

    Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.

    Solver Engine

    Engine: Simplex LP

    Solution Time: 0.015 Seconds.

    Iterations: 23 Subproblems: 0

    Solver Options

    Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling

    Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume

    NonNegative

    Objective Cell (Min)

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    30/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 29

    Cell Name Original Value Final Value

    $C$21 Project Cost Project 1 4849 4849

    Variable Cells

    Cell Name Original Value Final Value Integer

    $C$4 Worker 1 Project 1 0 0 Contin

    $D$4 Worker 1 Project 2 0 0 Contin

    $E$4 Worker 1 Project 3 0 0 Contin

    $F$4 Worker 1 Project 4 0 0 Contin

    $G$4 Worker 1 Project 5 0 0 Contin

    $H$4 Worker 1 Project 6 1 1 Contin

    $C$5 Worker 2 Project 1 0 0 Contin

    $D$5 Worker 2 Project 2 1 1 Contin

    $E$5 Worker 2 Project 3 0 0 Contin

    $F$5 Worker 2 Project 4 0 0 Contin

    $G$5 Worker 2 Project 5 0 0 Contin

    $H$5 Worker 2 Project 6 0 0 Contin

    $C$6 Worker 3 Project 1 1 1 Contin

    $D$6 Worker 3 Project 2 0 0 Contin

    $E$6 Worker 3 Project 3 0 0 Contin

    $F$6 Worker 3 Project 4 0 0 Contin

    $G$6 Worker 3 Project 5 0 0 Contin

    $H$6 Worker 3 Project 6 0 0 Contin

    $C$7 Worker 4 Project 1 0 0 Contin

    $D$7 Worker 4 Project 2 0 0 Contin

    $E$7 Worker 4 Project 3 0 0 Contin$F$7 Worker 4 Project 4 1 1 Contin

    $G$7 Worker 4 Project 5 0 0 Contin

    $H$7 Worker 4 Project 6 0 0 Contin

    $C$8 Worker 5 Project 1 0 0 Contin

    $D$8 Worker 5 Project 2 0 0 Contin

    $E$8 Worker 5 Project 3 0 0 Contin

    $F$8 Worker 5 Project 4 0 0 Contin

    $G$8 Worker 5 Project 5 1 1 Contin

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    31/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 30

    $H$8 Worker 5 Project 6 0 0 Contin

    $C$9 Worker 5 Project 1 0 0 Contin

    $D$9 Worker 5 Project 2 0 0 Contin

    $E$9 Worker 5 Project 3 1 1 Contin

    $F$9 Worker 5 Project 4 0 0 Contin

    $G$9 Worker 5 Project 5 0 0 Contin

    $H$9 Worker 5 Project 6 0 0 Contin

    Constraints

    Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack

    $N$3 Project 1 Net Flow -1 $N$3=$P$3 Binding 0

    $N$4 Project 2 Net Flow -1 $N$4=$P$4 Binding 0

    $N$5 Project 3 Net Flow -1 $N$5=$P$5 Binding 0

    $N$6 Project 4 Net Flow -1 $N$6=$P$6 Binding 0

    $N$7 Project 5 Net Flow -1 $N$7=$P$7 Binding 0

    $N$8 Project 6 Net Flow -1 $N$8=$P$8 Binding 0

    $N$9 Worker 1 Net Flow 1 $N$9=$P$9 Binding 0

    $N$10 Worker 2 Net Flow 1 $N$10=$P$10 Binding 0

    $N$11 Worker 3 Net Flow 1 $N$11=$P$11 Binding 0

    $N$12 Worker 4 Net Flow 1 $N$12=$P$12 Binding 0

    $N$13 Worker 5 Net Flow 1 $N$13=$P$13 Binding 0

    $N$14 Worker 6 Net Flow 1 $N$14=$P$14 Binding 0

    Microsoft Excel 14.0 Sensitivity Report

    Worksheet: [Book1]Sheet1

    Report Created: 12/03/2013 20:32:32

    Variable Cells

    Final

    Reduce

    d Objective

    Allowabl

    e

    Allowabl

    e

    Cell Name Valu Cost Coefficien Increase Decrease

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    32/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 31

    e t

    $C$4 Worker 1 Project 1 0 0 871 4 195

    $D$4 Worker 1 Project 2 0 295 1466 1E+30 295

    $E$4 Worker 1 Project 3 0 376 1276 1E+30 376

    $F$4 Worker 1 Project 4 0 0 1091 195 151

    $G$4 Worker 1 Project 5 0 4 1417 1E+30 4

    $H$4 Worker 1 Project 6 1 0 840 295 1E+30

    $C$5 Worker 2 Project 1 0 444 902 1E+30 444

    $D$5 Worker 2 Project 2 1 0 758 283 1E+30

    $E$5 Worker 2 Project 3 0 698 1185 1E+30 698

    $F$5 Worker 2 Project 4 0 624 1302 1E+30 624

    $G$5 Worker 2 Project 5 0 283 1283 1E+30 283

    $H$5 Worker 2 Project 6 0 696 1123 1E+30 696

    $C$6 Worker 3 Project 1 1 0 807 195 4

    $D$6 Worker 3 Project 2 0 353 1460 1E+30 353

    $E$6 Worker 3 Project 3 0 0 836 4 195

    $F$6 Worker 3 Project 4 0 204 1231 1E+30 204

    $G$6 Worker 3 Project 5 0 19 1368 1E+30 19

    $H$6 Worker 3 Project 6 0 307 1083 1E+30 307$C$7 Worker 4 Project 1 0 151 751 1E+30 151

    $D$7 Worker 4 Project 2 0 0 900 216 283

    $E$7 Worker 4 Project 3 0 560 1189 1E+30 560

    $F$7 Worker 4 Project 4 1 0 820 151 216

    $G$7 Worker 4 Project 5 0 270 1412 1E+30 270

    $H$7 Worker 4 Project 6 0 787 1356 1E+30 787

    $C$8 Worker 5 Project 1 0 419 794 1E+30 419

    $D$8 Worker 5 Project 2 0 216 891 1E+30 216

    $E$8 Worker 5 Project 3 0 738 1142 1E+30 738

    $F$8 Worker 5 Project 4 0 195 790 1E+30 195

    $G$8 Worker 5 Project 5 1 0 917 195 1E+30

    $H$8 Worker 5 Project 6 0 755 1099 1E+30 755

    $C$9 Worker 5 Project 1 0 475 1153 1E+30 475

    $D$9 Worker 5 Project 2 0 450 1428 1E+30 450

    $E$9 Worker 5 Project 3 1 0 707 195 4

    $F$9 Worker 5 Project 4 0 590 1488 1E+30 590

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    33/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 32

    $G$9 Worker 5 Project 5 0 0 1220 4 195

    $H$9 Worker 5 Project 6 0 295 942 1E+30 295

    Constraints

    Final Shadow

    Constrain

    t

    Allowabl

    e

    Allowabl

    e

    Cell Name

    Valu

    e Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease

    $N$3 Project 1 Net Flow -1 -600 -1 0 0

    $N$4 Project 2 Net Flow -1 -900 -1 0 0

    $N$5 Project 3 Net Flow -1 -629 -1 0 0

    $N$6 Project 4 Net Flow -1 -820 -1 1 0

    $N$7 Project 5 Net Flow -1 -1142 -1 0 0

    $N$8 Project 6 Net Flow -1 -569 -1 1 0

    $N$9 Worker 1 Net Flow 1 271 1 1 0

    $N$1

    0 Worker 2 Net Flow 1 -142 1 0 0

    $N$1

    1 Worker 3 Net Flow 1 207 1 0 0

    $N$1

    2 Worker 4 Net Flow 1 0 1 0 1E+30

    $N$1

    3 Worker 5 Net Flow 1 -225 1 0 0

    $N$1

    4 Worker 6 Net Flow 1 78 1 0 0

    PROBLEM 2

    Microsoft Excel 14.0 Answer Report

    Worksheet: [ACME.xlsx]Sheet2

    Report Created: 12/03/2013 21:49:50

    Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.

    Solver Engine

    Engine: Simplex LP

    Solution Time: 0.031 Seconds.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    34/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 33

    Iterations: 26 Subproblems: 0

    Solver Options

    Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling

    Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegative

    Objective Cell (Min)

    Cell Name

    Original

    Value Final Value

    $D$22 Project Cost Surfacer 99 99

    Variable Cells

    Cell Name

    Original

    Value Final Value Integer

    $D$5 Worker 1 Surfacer 1 1 Contin

    $E$5 Worker 1 Lathe 0 0 Contin

    $F$5 Worker 1 Sander 1 0 0 Contin

    $G$5 Worker 1 Router 0 0 Contin

    $H$5 Worker 1 Sander 2 0 0 Contin$I$5 Worker 1 Drill 0 0 Contin

    $D$6 Worker 2 Surfacer 0 0 Contin

    $E$6 Worker 2 Lathe 0 0 Contin

    $F$6 Worker 2 Sander 1 0 0 Contin

    $G$6 Worker 2 Router 1 1 Contin

    $H$6 Worker 2 Sander 2 0 0 Contin

    $I$6 Worker 2 Drill 0 0 Contin

    $D$7 Worker 3 Surfacer 0 0 Contin

    $E$7 Worker 3 Lathe 0 0 Contin

    $F$7 Worker 3 Sander 1 0 0 Contin

    $G$7 Worker 3 Router 0 0 Contin

    $H$7 Worker 3 Sander 2 1 1 Contin

    $I$7 Worker 3 Drill 0 0 Contin

    $D$8 Worker 4 Surfacer 0 0 Contin

    $E$8 Worker 4 Lathe 0 0 Contin

    $F$8 Worker 4 Sander 1 1 1 Contin

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    35/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 34

    $G$8 Worker 4 Router 0 0 Contin

    $H$8 Worker 4 Sander 2 0 0 Contin

    $I$8 Worker 4 Drill 0 0 Contin

    $D$9 Worker 5 Surfacer 0 0 Contin

    $E$9 Worker 5 Lathe 1 1 Contin

    $F$9 Worker 5 Sander 1 0 0 Contin

    $G$9 Worker 5 Router 0 0 Contin

    $H$9 Worker 5 Sander 2 0 0 Contin

    $I$9 Worker 5 Drill 0 0 Contin

    $D$10 Worker 5 Surfacer 0 0 Contin

    $E$10 Worker 5 Lathe 0 0 Contin

    $F$10 Worker 5 Sander 1 0 0 Contin

    $G$10 Worker 5 Router 0 0 Contin

    $H$10 Worker 5 Sander 2 0 0 Contin

    $I$10 Worker 5 Drill 1 1 Contin

    Constraints

    Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack

    $O$4 Surfacer Net Flow -1 $O$4=$Q$4 Binding 0

    $O$5 Lathe Net Flow -1 $O$5=$Q$5 Binding 0

    $O$6 Sander 1 Net Flow -1 $O$6=$Q$6 Binding 0

    $O$7 Router Net Flow -1 $O$7=$Q$7 Binding 0

    $O$8 Sander 2 Net Flow -1 $O$8=$Q$8 Binding 0

    $O$9 Drill Net Flow -1 $O$9=$Q$9 Binding 0

    $O$10 Worker 1 Net Flow 1 $O$10=$Q$10 Binding 0

    $O$11 Worker 2 Net Flow 1 $O$11=$Q$11 Binding 0$O$12 Worker 3 Net Flow 1 $O$12=$Q$12 Binding 0

    $O$13 Worker 4 Net Flow 1 $O$13=$Q$13 Binding 0

    $O$14 Worker 5 Net Flow 1 $O$14=$Q$14 Binding 0

    $O$15 Worker 6 Net Flow 1 $O$15=$Q$15 Binding 0

    Microsoft Excel 14.0 Sensitivity Report

    Worksheet: [ACME.xlsx]Sheet2

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    36/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 35

    Report Created: 12/03/2013 21:49:50

    Variable Cells

    Final

    Reduce

    d Objective

    Allowabl

    e

    Allowabl

    e

    Cell Name

    Valu

    e Cost

    Coefficien

    t Increase Decrease

    $D$5 Worker 1 Surfacer 1 0 13 0 1E+30

    $E$5 Worker 1 Lathe 0 7 22 1E+30 7

    $F$5 Worker 1 Sander 1 0 5 19 1E+30 5

    $G$5 Worker 1 Router 0 5 21 1E+30 5$H$5 Worker 1 Sander 2 0 4 16 1E+30 4

    $I$5 Worker 1 Drill 0 0 20 4 0

    $D$6 Worker 2 Surfacer 0 3 18 1E+30 3

    $E$6 Worker 2 Lathe 0 0 17 2 4

    $F$6 Worker 2 Sander 1 0 8 24 1E+30 8

    $G$6 Worker 2 Router 1 0 18 3 2

    $H$6 Worker 2 Sander 2 0 8 22 1E+30 8

    $I$6 Worker 2 Drill 0 5 27 1E+30 5

    $D$7 Worker 3 Surfacer 0 2 20 1E+30 2

    $E$7 Worker 3 Lathe 0 2 22 1E+30 2

    $F$7 Worker 3 Sander 1 0 4 23 1E+30 4

    $G$7 Worker 3 Router 0 3 24 1E+30 3

    $H$7 Worker 3 Sander 2 1 0 17 2 1E+30

    $I$7 Worker 3 Drill 0 6 31 1E+30 6

    $D$8 Worker 4 Surfacer 0 2 14 1E+30 2$E$8 Worker 4 Lathe 0 5 19 1E+30 5

    $F$8 Worker 4 Sander 1 1 0 13 2 1E+30

    $G$8 Worker 4 Router 0 15 30 1E+30 15

    $H$8 Worker 4 Sander 2 0 12 23 1E+30 12

    $I$8 Worker 4 Drill 0 3 22 1E+30 3

    $D$9 Worker 5 Surfacer 0 9 21 1E+30 9

    $E$9 Worker 5 Lathe 1 0 14 4 1E+30

    $F$9 Worker 5 Sander 1 0 4 17 1E+30 4

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    37/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 36

    $G$9 Worker 5 Router 0 10 25 1E+30 10

    $H$9 Worker 5 Sander 2 0 4 15 1E+30 4

    $I$9 Worker 5 Drill 0 4 23 1E+30 4

    $D$1

    0 Worker 5 Surfacer 0 0 17 1E+30 0

    $E$10 Worker 5 Lathe 0 4 23 1E+30 4

    $F$10 Worker 5 Sander 1 0 0 18 4 2

    $G$1

    0 Worker 5 Router 0 0 20 2 3

    $H$1

    0 Worker 5 Sander 2 0 0 16 4 2

    $I$10 Worker 5 Drill 1 0 24 0 4

    Constraints

    Final Shadow

    Constrain

    t

    Allowabl

    e

    Allowabl

    e

    Cell Name

    Valu

    e Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease

    $O$4 Surfacer Net Flow -1 -12 -1 1 0

    $O$5 Lathe Net Flow -1 -14 -1 0 0

    $O$6 Sander 1 Net Flow -1 -13 -1 1 0

    $O$7 Router Net Flow -1 -15 -1 0 0

    $O$8 Sander 2 Net Flow -1 -11 -1 0 0

    $O$9 Drill Net Flow -1 -19 -1 1 0

    $O$1

    0 Worker 1 Net Flow 1 1 1 1 0

    $O$11 Worker 2 Net Flow 1 3 1 0 0

    $O$1

    2 Worker 3 Net Flow 1 6 1 0 0

    $O$1

    3 Worker 4 Net Flow 1 0 1 0 1E+30

    $O$1

    4 Worker 5 Net Flow 1 0 1 0 0

    $O$1 Worker 6 Net Flow 1 5 1 1 0

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    38/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 37

    5

    INTERPRETATION

    The sensitivity reports for both the problems are shown above. The sensitivity report has two

    distinct tables, titled Variable Cells and Constraints. These tables permit us to answer several

    what-if questions regarding the problem solution.

    The Variable Cells table presents information regarding the impact of changes to the OFCs

    on the optimal solution. The constraints table presents information related to the impact of the

    changes in constraint RHS values on the optimal solution.

    The sensitivity report also gives the allowable increase and decrease on each variable.

    RESULTS

    PROBLEM 1

    Individual Machine Assigned

    Worker 1 Surfacer

    Worker 2 Router

    Worker 3 Sander 2

    Worker 4 Sander 1

    Worker 5 Lathe

    Worker 6 Drill

    PROBLEM 2

    Individual Project Assigned

    Worker 1 Project 6

    Worker 2 Project 2

    Worker 3 Project 1

    Worker 4 Project 4

    Worker 5 Project 5

    Worker 6 Project 3

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    39/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 38

    CONCLUSION

    Thus from the above results we can observe that ACME assigns its workers to projects and to

    machines using LP. Thus LP model is an effective tool in determining the allocation of

    worker to jobs and machines.

    OPTIMUM PRODUCT MIX AT DONUT SHOP OF

    WELCOMHERITAGE GROUP

    INTRODUCTION TO THE HOTEL INDUSTRYAccording to the British laws a hotel is a place where a bonafied traveler canreceive food

    and shelter provided he is in a position to for it and is in a fit condition toreceive.Hotels have

    a very long history, but not as we know today, way back in the 6th century BC when the first

    inn in and around the city of London began to develop. Thefirst catered to travelers and

    provided them with a mere roof to stay under. This conditionof the inns prevailed for a long

    time, until the industrial revolution in England, which brought about new ideas and progress

    in the business at inn keeping.The invention of the steam engine made traveling even more

    prominent. Whichhad to more and more people traveling not only for business but also for

    leisure reasons.This lead to the actual development of the hotel industry as we know it

    today.Hotel today not only cater to the basic needs of the guest like food and shelter provide

    much more than that, like personalized services etc.Hotels today are a Home away from

    home.

    CLASSIFICATION OF HOTELS

    Hotel can be classified into different categories or classes, based on their operational criteria.For example the type of accommodation they provide, location of the property, type of

    services provided, facilities given and the clientele they cater to can helpcategories hotels

    today.

    Hotels today are basically classified into the following categories:

    1Market segment:

    Economy / limited services hotel

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    40/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 39

    Mid market hotel

    All suite hotels

    Time-share hotels

    Condotel / Condiminium

    Executive hotels

    Luxury / Deluxe hotels

    Property type:

    Traditional hotel

    Motels

    Bread and break fast inns

    Commercial hotel

    Chain hotel

    Casino hotel

    Boutique hotels

    Resorts

    Spas Conference resorts

    2) According to size:

    Small hotels [150 rooms]

    Medium hotels [up to 299rooms]

    Large hotels [up to 600rooms]Other classification can be based on:a)Market segment

    b)Property typec)Sized)Level of servicese)Owner ship and applicationf)Plansg)Type of

    patronageh)Length of guAccording to size:

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    41/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 40

    Small hotels [150 rooms]

    Medium hotels [up to 299rooms]

    Large hotels [up to 600rooms]Other classification can be based on:a)Market segment

    b)Property typec)Sized)Level of servicese)Owner ship and applicationf)Plansg)Type of

    patronageh)Length of guest staest stayi)Location etc

    MARKET SEGMENT

    Economy hotel:It provides efficient sanity private rooms with bath. The furnishing and decor

    areacceptable to majority of travelers. Food and beverage service may or may not

    beavailable.Mid market hotels:They offer comfortable accommodation with private on

    premises bath. Food and beverage services and uniformed bell staff. They offer above

    average luxury.All Suite hotels:It offers separate sleeping and living areas along with a

    kitchenette and a stocked bar, and offer class service.First class hotels:They are luxury hotels

    with exceptional decor better than average food and beverage service, uniformed bell

    services. They often have 2 or 3 dining rooms swimming pool, spas etc.Deluxe hotels

    They are better and offer more specialized services than first class hotels. Theyalso provide

    limousine services.

    PROPERTY TYPE

    Traditional hotels: They have the basic concept of rooms with breakfast, bell desk services

    and the other usual services.

    Motels: They are located on highways. Guest is given parking right outside their rooms. The

    usually have a gas station / workshop attached to them.

    Resorts: They are usually situated in tourist locations like on rivers, mountains, jungles, or

    the sea. They give more privilege to sports activities leisure and re-creation activities like

    manages, sightseeing, adventure sports, etc.

    Resident hotels: Where guest stay for longer duration, stay like weeks, months even years.

    Casino hotel

    They are hotels usually in tourist spots and mainly cater to people who are on holidays.

    Casino hotels like the name suggest offer gambling facilities along with accommodations.SIZE

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    42/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 41

    Small hotelup to 150 rooms Medium hotels150 to 299 rooms Large hotels299 to 600

    rooms Extra large hotelsabove 600 rooms

    LEVEL OF SERVICES:World-class services: They target top business executives and provide service s that cater to

    needs of such people like lap tops in the rooms, business center, sectarian services.

    Mid- range services: They appeal to the larger segment of traveling public [tourist]. The

    services provided by the hotel are moderate and sufficient to budgeted travelers.

    Economy / Limited services hotel: They provide comfortable and inexpensive rooms and

    meet the basic requirement of the guest. These hotels may be large of small in size depending

    on the kind of business they get. The key factor behind the survival of these hotels is that they

    are priced very low and are in the budget of most of the travellers.

    OWNERSHIP AND AFFILIATION:

    Independent hotels: They have no application with other properties. They have their own

    management and are single properties with one owner.

    Chain hotels: They impose certain minimum standards, levels of service, policies and

    procedures to be followed by their entire establishment. Chain hotels usually have corporate

    offices that monitor all their properties and one management runs these properties. That is all

    the hotels under the chain are completely owned and run by thechain itself.

    Franchisee hotels: The franchisee grants the entities, the right to conduct business provided

    they follow the established pattern of the franchisee, maintains their standards, levels of

    service, practice their policies and procedures.

    AWARDING OF CLASS:

    Awarding of class is done by the HRACC in India. These are a few things listed down that

    are taken into consideration while awarding star category to any hotels.

    Number and types of rooms the hotel has

    Elegant and comfortable surroundings

    Rooms efficiency

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    43/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 42

    Cleanness and sanitation

    Staff size and specialization

    Range and level of services

    Number of Restaurants

    Bars and Beverage services

    Concierge services

    Accessibility to entertainment

    Availability of transportation

    Spa and swimming pool facility

    Reservation and referral services.

    Star category of hotels [India]

    One star [*]Two star [**]Three star [***]Four star [****]Five star [*****]Five star deluxe

    [***** deluxe]

    THREE STAR CATEGORIES:

    For a hotel to be recognized as a three star property the architectural features and general

    features of the building should be very good there should be adequate parking facilities. At

    least 50% of the rooms must be air-conditioned. Also the ambience and dcor of the place

    must be ecstatic.

    They should provide reservation and information facility apart from reception, information,bell service at least two gourmet dining facility should be available. The establishment may

    or may not have banqueting facility.

    They should provide high levels of personalized services. The staff must be well-trained and

    proper standards for hygiene and sanitation must be followed. Also all properties have to

    keep in mind that proper waste management is done.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    44/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 43

    FIVE STAR CATEGORIES:

    Five star categories is only allotted to properties, which have all the qualities of a three star

    property and a few additional. Like the entire property must be centrally air-conditioned. The

    building of the property must be an attractive one. All the rooms must be spacious. The

    property must have proper banqueting facility, business center. Proper and well-maintained

    pool and health club a spa is optional. The property must have 24 hour coffee shop, round the

    clock room service, a bar and a minimum of 1 gourmet restaurant. The staff must be highly

    trained and a degree of specialization must be shown. State of art equipment must be used

    and the facility provided in the rooms must be sophisticated.

    FIVE STAR DELUXE CATEGORIES:

    They are more or less like five star properties with the only difference is that they are on a

    larger scale. Five star deluxe properties maintain a very high staff to guest ratio and very high

    levels of service is maintained. They in addition to five star properties have5 to 7 dining

    rooms, a bar, 24-hour coffee shop, banqueting facility. Spas, fitness centers, business centers

    ETC

    ABOUT WELCOMHERITAGE GROUP

    WelcomHeritage, a joint venture between ITC Ltd. and Jodhana Heritage, represents some ofthe best traditions of heritage hospitality and tourism in India. It offer's over 37 exclusive

    heritage destinations, ranging from grand palaces to traditional havelis and magnificent forts;

    from adventure-filled jungle lodges to tea garden homes and quiet nature resorts in Rajasthan,

    Madhya Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir, West Bengal,

    Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Puducherry &

    Goa

    A holiday with WelcomHeritage is always special: timeless bazaars, elephant and camel

    safaris, local festivals, desert camps and a variety of adventure and sport activities. steeped in

    history are stories of heroic warriors and illustrious queens; of royal courts and princes; pomp

    and pageantry and gracious and splendid living. Through the relentless passage of time, many

    a legend has been relegated to the pages of history, others are extolled in verse and sung by

    traditional bards and folk singers. Some live on in the palaces, forts and royal retreats even

    today. Their private homes beckon the visitor, with elegant WelcomHeritage hospitality. We

    offer you a slice of history, with one major difference.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    45/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 44

    WelcomHeritage Hotels offers the secrets for a great escape. At each WelcomHeritage hotel,

    you can experience our rich heritage and culture. A fort resort at the rim of a desert, or a

    country manor in the lap of a green valley. A jungle lodge in a wildlife forest reserve, or a

    palace or haveli, resonant with the past. A picture-postcard cottage ensconced in mystic

    mountains or a splendid mansion on the spur of a hill. A spa in a heritage home, a houseboat

    on a sparkling lake, a colonial hill residence with tea gardens for a view, a mist-wrapped

    palace in fragrant plantations. Each hotel has a secret to share, a story to tell - and so will

    you.Moreover, each WelcomHeritage hotel has the blueprint of a great holiday all laid out for

    you. Every hotel offers you an opportunity to go where you get away to all that is not

    ordinary.All that is exclusive, while being affordable. Unusual, without being over-the-top.

    WelcomHeritage's over 40 hotels are sited conveniently - often in stunningly scenic locations

    - with easy connections from cities, making them the perfect holiday option.

    Most of all, you will find an atmospheric, boutique experience, far removed from

    standardised sameness. Hospitality that comes from the heart. Accommodation that combines

    a slice of heritage with modern amenities. A local flavour in the cuisine, the craft and the

    cultural vignettes. Views to fill albums, walls dotted with frames, trophies and treasures. A

    feeling of being at a home away from home.And, last but not the least, that uncommon

    unforgettable quality that makes your holiday a holiday to remember - and recount.

    These are some of the hotels

    Welcome Heritage Bal Samand Lake Palace (Jodhpur)

    Welcome Heritage Ferrnhills Royale Palace (Ooty)

    Welcome Heritage Khimsar Fort (Khimsar)

    Welcome Heritage Lallgarh Palace (Dist. Bikaner)

    Welcome Heritage Noor-Us-Sabah Palace (Bhopal)

    Welcome Heritage Shivavilas Palace (Sandur)

    Welcome Heritage Taragarh Palace (Palampur)

    Welcome Heritage Umed Bhawan Palace (Kota)

    Welcome Heritage Windamere (Darjeeling)

    LP APPLIED IN WELCOMHERITAGE GROUP

    Mathematical formulation:A typical mathematical problem consists of a single objective

    function, representing either profits to be maximised or costs to be minimised, and a set of

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    46/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 45

    constraints that circumscribe the decision variables. In the case of a linear program (LP), the

    objective function and constraints are all linear functions of the decision variables.

    Linear programming is a widely used model type that can solve decision problems withthousands of variables. Generally, the feasible values of the decision variables are limited by

    a set of constraints that are described by mathematical functions of the decision variables.

    The feasible decisions are compared using an objective function that depends on the decision

    variables. For a linear program, the objective function and constraints are required to be

    linearly related to the variables of the problem.

    A linear programming problem (LPP) is a special case of a mathematical programming

    problem wherein a mathematical program tries to identify an extreme (i.e. minimum ormaximum) point of a function f(x1, x2, .. , xn) , which furthermore satisfies a set of

    constraints, e.g. g(x1, x2, . Xn) b. Linear programming is the specialisation of

    mathematical programming to the case where both function f, to be called objective function,

    and the problem constraints are linear.

    Problem: Manager of a donut store that sells two types of donuts: regular and chocolate.

    Making one batch of regular donuts takes 1 hour of an employee As time and 2 hours of

    employee Bs time. Making one batch of chocolate donuts takes 2 hours of employee As

    time and 1 hour of employee Bs time. One batch of regular and chocolate donuts sells at $35

    and $55 respectively. It costs $30 and $45 to make a batch of regular and chocolate donuts

    respectively. Employee A works 8 hours a day and employee B works only 7 hours a day.

    Your donuts are so good that there is unlimited amount of demand for them. Everyday, you

    want to produce at least one batch of regular donuts. You always have enough to make only 4

    batches of chocolate donuts every day.

    Now you need to decide how many batches of regular and chocolate donuts to be made so

    that your objective of maximising profit is met. You have the constraints As and Bs time,

    ingredients of chocolate donuts, production rule of 1 batch of regular donuts, no negative

    number of donuts and no partial batches.

    Sensitivity Analysis

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    47/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 46

    Let us denote batches of regular donuts to produce as R and batches of chocolate donuts to

    produce as C. By writing the objective function in terms of the above , we have Maximise 5R

    + 10C.

    {Regular donuts profits are 3530 = 5$ and chocolate donuts profits are 55- 45 = 10$}

    Let us now express all constraints using decision codes:

    Employee As time = 8 hours. Hence, 1R + 2C 8

    Employee Bs time = 7hours. Hence 2R + 1C 7

    Ingredients for chocolate donuts= 4, Hence C 4

    Atleast one batch of regular donuts; R 1

    No negative number of donuts of either type: Hence R 0,C 0

    No partial batches allowed R & C are integers.

    Figure:1 Graphical presentation of LP problem

    Solution: The shaded area is where the inequalities of four equations are satisfied. The

    objective function to maximise 5R + 10C is attained at the point C(3,2). Hence the optimal

    solution is to prepare 3 batches of Chocolate and 2 batches of Regular donuts.

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    48/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 47

    Observation & Conclusion: In this paper we studied that linear programming , which is

    very successfully used in many industries can also be used in food & beverage department of

    a hotel. We have discussed here how we could use LP to maximise the objective function and

    obtain an optimal solution. Though only two variables have been used here, the same could

    be extended for more variables and solution could be attained by using Excel solver.

    HSBC- PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT USING LP MODEL

    INTRODUCTION TO BANKING INDUSTRY

    Finance is the life blood of trade, commerce and industry. Now-a-days, banking sector acts as

    the backbone of modern business. Development of any country mainly depends upon the

    banking system.

    A bank is a financial institution which deals with deposits and advances and other related

    services. It receives money from those who want to save in the form of deposits and it lends

    money to those who need it. Oxford Dictionary defines a bank as "an establishment for

    custody of money, which it pays out on customer's order."

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    49/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 48

    About HSBC

    HSBC Holdings plc is a British multinational banking and financial services company

    headquartered in London, United Kingdom. HSBC is a universal bank and is organized

    within four business groups: Commercial banking; Global banking and Markets (investment

    banking); Retail Banking and Wealth Management; and Global Private Banking. It has

    around 7,200 offices in 85 countries and territories across Africa, Asia, Europe, North

    America and South America, and around 89 million customers. As of 31 March 2012 it had

    total assets of $2.637 trillion, of which roughly half were in Europe, the Middle East and

    Africa, and a quarter each in Asia-Pacific and the Americas.

    HSBC Holdings plc was founded in London in 1991 by The Hong Kong and ShanghaiBanking Corporation to act as a new group holding company and to enable the acquisition of

    UK-based Midland Bank. The origins of the bank lie in Hong Kong and Shanghai, where

    branches were first opened in 1865. Today, HSBC remains the largest bank in Hong Kong,

    and recent expansion in mainland China, where it is now the largest international bank has

    returned it to that part of its roots.

    PORTFOLIO SELECTION FOR HSBC

    HSBC is one such company which uses Linear Programming Technique to solve the issues

    regarding portfolios like shares, bonds, Mutual funds etc. In this report, according to the

    survey conducted on how many number of shares, bonds and mutual funds HSBC owns, the

    information is gathered and LP model is used to solve the problem. The following are the

    investment options for HSBC

    PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Expected annual return of investments

    Investment Expected annual return rate (%)

    Share Amanufacturing sector 15.4

    Share Bmanufacturing sector 19.2

    Share C - food and beverage sector 18.7

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    50/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 49

    Share D - food and beverage sector 13.5

    Mutual fund A 17.8

    Mutual fund B 16.3

    Requirements

    Total amount = 90000 Amount in shares of a sector no larger than 50% of total available Amount in shares with the larger return of a sector less or equal to 80% of sectors

    total amount

    Amount in manufacturing company less or equal to 10% of the whole share amount Amount in mutual funds less or equal to 25% of the amount in manufacturing

    shares

    To select a portfolio package from set of investment options and to maximize the return orminimize the risk in each of these investments with the given capital using Linear

    Programming model.

    Solution

    Define Decision variables

    x1 = invested amount in share A of the manufacturing sector

    x2 = invested amount in share B of the manufacturing sector

    x3 = invested amount in share C of the food and beverage sector

    x4 = invested amount in share D of the food and beverage sector

    x5 = invested amount in mutual fund A

    x6 = invested amount in mutual fund B

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    51/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 50

    Mathematical Formulation

    Objective Function:

    Max z = 0.154x1 + 0.192x2 + 0.187x3 + 0.135 x4 + 0.178x5 + 0.163x6

    Subject to constraints:

    x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    52/53

    APPLICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING ACROSS VARIOUSSECTORSCASE BASED APPROACH

    C-9

    DECISION MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION SDMIMD, MYSORE 51

    RESULTS

    Investment Amount invested Annual return rate

    expected (%)

    Total expected return

    of

    the investment

    Share A 27900 15.4 4296.6

    Share B 8100 19.2 1555.2

    Share C 36000 18.7 6732

    Share D 9000 13.5 1215

    Mutual fund A 9000 17.8 1602

    Mutual fund B 0 16.3 0

  • 7/28/2019 Data Modelling and Optimization Report

    53/53

    APPLICATION OF LI