database implementation for modern hardware · 32bob black 25jane jones salery 40000 ... modern...

1 / 25

Modern Hardware Main-Memory Databases

Main-Memory Databases

2 / 25


MotivationHardware trends

• Huge main memory capacitywith complex access characteristics (Caches, NUMA)

• Many-core CPUs• SIMD support in CPUs• New CPU features (HTM)• Also: Graphic cards, FPGAs, low latency networking,. . .

Database system trends• Entire database fits into main memory• New types of database systems• New algorithms, new data structures

“The End of an Architectural Era.(It’s Time for a Complete Rewrite).”

3 / 25


Recap: Database WorkloadsAnalytics

• Long-running• Access large parts of the database• Often use scans• Read-only• Example: “Average order value per year and product group?”

Transaction processing• Short running• (Multiple) point queries + simple control flow• Insert/Update/Delete/Read data• Example: “Increment account x by 10, decrement account y by 10”

Universal DBMS used for both (but not concurrently).

4 / 25


OLTP

Universal DBMS were optimized for 1970’s hardware• Small fraction of DB in memory buffer• Hide and avoid disk access at any cost

Today• Even enterprises can store entire DB in memory• Transaction are often “one-shot”• Transactions execute in a few ms or even µs

5 / 25


OLTP (2)

Main sources of overhead• ARIES-style logging• Locking (2PL)• Latching• Buffer Management

Useful work can be as low as 160 th of instructions1.

Modern systems avoid this overhead (see slide 9).

1Harizopoulos et al. – OLTP Through the Looking Glass, and What We Found There

6 / 25


Physical Data Layout in Main MemoryLightweight:

• Buffer Manager removed• No need for segments• No need for slotted pages

Store data in simple arrays. But: Row-wise or column-wise?

EmpId First Last10 Joe Doe20 Mary Jones32 Bob Black25 Jane Jones

Salery40000320006000085000

EmpId

10203225

First

JoeMaryBobJane

Last

DoeJonesBlackJones

Salery

40000320006000085000

Tuples

10 Joe Doe 20 25 Jane Jones40000 85000Mary ...

Logical Table

Column Store

Row Store

7 / 25


Physical Data Layout in Main Memory (2)

Row Store:• Beneficial when accessing many attributes• For OLTP

Column Store:• Excellent cache utilization• Sometimes individually sorted• Compression potential• Vectorized processing• For OLAP

Hybrid Row/Column Stores possible

8 / 25


New Systems (Examples)

OLTP-only:• VoltDB/H-Store• Microsoft Hekaton

OLAP-only:• Vectorwise• MonetDB• DB2 BLU

Hybrid OLTP and OLAP:• SAP HANA• HyPer

9 / 25


New Systems: OLTP (Examples)Challenge:

• Avoid overhead• Guarantee ACID

Approaches:• Buffer Management: Removed• Logging

I H-Store/VoltDB: Log shipping to other nodesI Hekaton: Lightweight logging (no index structures)

• Locking:I H-Store/VoltDB: Serial execution (on private partitions)I Hekaton: Optimistic MVCC

• LatchingI H-Store/VoltDB: Not necessaryI Hekaton: Latch-free data structures

10 / 25


New Systems: Hekaton• Integrated in SQL Server• Code Generation• Only access path: Index (Hash or B(w)-Tree)• Latch-Free Indexes• MVCC

10 John 10020

15 Jane 150inf

30 LarryTx75

20 John 110Tx75

Tx75 Larry 150inf

Tx75 John 130Inf

J

L

Old

New

Old

New

Hash indexon Name

Begin End Name City

Header Payload

Record format

100

100

100

100

Pointer••• Amount

Links

London

Paris

London

London

170Rome

Rome

Ordered indexon City

B-tree

11 / 25


New Systems: OLAP

• Vectorwise: Vectorized Processing• HyPer: Query Compilation (cf. Chapter Code Generation)

12 / 25


New Systems: Hybrid OLTP and OLAP

Traditionally:• Mixing OLTP and OLAP leads to performance decline• ETL architecture• 2 systems, stale data

New Systems• SAP HANA

I Split DB into read-optimized main and update-friendly deltaI OLAP queries read main, OLTP transactions read delta and mainI Periodically merge main and delta

• HyPer: Virtual memory snapshots

13 / 25


HyPer: Virtual Memory Snapshots

CD

AB

GH

EF

OLTP Data

OLTP Tx

forked OLAP-Snapshot

13 / 25



CD

AB

GH

EF

OLTP Data

OLTP Tx

OLAP Queries

forked OLAP-Snapshotfork

13 / 25



CD

AB

GH

EF

OLTP Data

OLTP Tx

OLAP Queries


read C

13 / 25



C*D

AB

GH

EF

CD

OLTP Data

OLTP Tx

OLAP Queries


copy-o

n-writ

eupdate C to C*

13 / 25



C*D

AB

GH

EF

CD

OLTP Data

OLTP Tx

OLAP Queries


read C

read H

14 / 25


In-Memory Index Structures

• In-memory hash indexesI Simple and fastI Growing is very expensiveI Do not support range queries

• Search TreesI BSTs are cache unfriendlyI B-Trees better (even though designed for disk)

• Radix-Trees (“Tries”)I Support range queriesI Height is independent from number of entries

15 / 25


Radix TreesProperties:

• Height depends on key length, not number of entries• No rebalancing• All insertion orders yield same tree• Keys are stored in the tree implicitely

Search:• Node is array of size 2s

• s bits (often 8) are used as an index into the array• s is a trade-off between lookup-performance and memory consuption

Radix Tree Adaptive Radix Tree

16 / 25


Adaptive Radix Trees

Four node types:• Node4: 4 keys and 4 pointers at corresponding positions:

0 2 3

key child pointer

b ca d

255

0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3

• Node16: Like Node4, but with 16 keys. SIMD searchable.• Node48: Full 256 keys (index offset), point to up to 48 values:

0 1 2… …

child index child pointer

3 255

da cb

0 1 2 47

• Node256: Regular trie node, i.e. array of size 256Additionally: Header with node type, number of entries

17 / 25


Exploiting HTM for OLTP

• Intel’s Haswell introduced HTM (via cache coherency protocol)• Allows to group instructions to transactions• Can help to implement DB transactions, but

I Do not guarantee ACID by themselvesI Limited in size/time

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

0 8KB 16KB 24KB 32KBtransaction size

abor

t pro

babi

lity

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

10K 100K 1M 10Mtransaction duration in cycles (log scale)

abor

t pro

babi

lity

⇒ Use HTM transactions as building blocks for DB transactions

18 / 25


Exploiting HTM for OLTP (2)

Goals:• As fine-grained as 2PL, but faster• As fast as serial execution, but more flexible

atomic-elide-lock (lock) {account[from]-=amount;account[to]+=amount;

}

19 / 25


Implementing DB transactions with HTMUse TSO + HTM for latching:

HTM transaction

conflict detection: read/write sets in hardwareelided lock: latch

single tuple accessverify/update tuple timestamps

...

...

database transaction

conflict detection: read/write sets via timestampselided lock: serial execution

request a new timestamp, record safe timestamp

release timestamp, update safe timestamp

HTM transaction

conflict detection: read/write sets in hardwareelided lock: latch

single tuple accessverify/update tuple timestamps

HTM co

nflic

t

HTM co

nflic

t

times

tam

p co

nflic

t

• Relation and index structure layout must avoid conflicts

20 / 25


NUMA-Aware Data Processing

NUMA architectures:

DRAM

socket 0

DRAM

socket 1

socket 3 socket 2

DRAM DRAM

DRAM

socket 0

DRAM

socket 1

socket 3 socket 2

DRAM DRAM

Nehalem EX Sandy Bridge EP

25.6GB/s 51.2GB/s

12.8GB/s

8 cores

24MB L3

8 cores

24MB L3

8 cores

24MB L3

8 cores

24MB L3

8 cores

20MB L3

8 cores

20MB L3

8 cores

20MB L3

8 cores

20MB L3

16.0GB/s(bidirectional)(bidirectional)

• Local access cheap• Remote access expensive

21 / 25


NUMA-Aware Data Processing: Hash JoinHT(T)

globalHash Table

morsel

T

Phase1

:pro

cess

T m

ors

el-w

ise

and

sto

re N

UM

A-l

oca

lly

Phase2

:sca

n N

UM

A-l

oca

l sto

rage

are

aan

d in

sert

po

inte

rs in

to H

T

next

mor

sel

Storagearea of

red core

Storagearea of

green core

Storagearea of

blue core

Insert the pointer

into HT

...(T) ...(T)...(T)

morsel

R

Storagearea of

red core

HT(T) HT(S)

Storagearea of

green core

Storagearea of

blue core

next

mor

sel

...(R) ...(R)...(R)

scan

scan

σ σ σσ σ σ

22 / 25


Compaction

• OLTP & OLAP share the same physical data modelI Fast modifications vs scan performanceI Row store vs column store

• Modifications require snapshot maintenanceI Use more memoryI Congest memory busI Stall transactions

23 / 25


Compaction: Hot/Cold Clustering

ideal reality compacted

• Compression is applied asynchronously to cold part:I Dictionary encodingI Run-length encodingI Other schemes possible

• Compact snapshots through a mix of regular and huge pagesI Keeps page table smallI Clustered updatesI No huge pages need to be replicated

24 / 25



Cold

Hot

Cooling

- Working Set (hot data)- Uncompressed- Small memory pages

- Hot & cold items mixed- Uncompressed- Small memory pages

- Cold & compressed data- Huge memory pages- Rarely accessed by OLTP- Immutable: Deleted and updated items are marked "invalid" and copied to Hot

Frozen

Huge memory page

Small memory page

- Cold data items only- Not compressed yet

Column

"Invalid frozen items"data structure

25 / 25



How to detect temperature without causing overhead?1. Software: LRU lists, counters2. Hardware: mprotect

3. Hardware: dirty and young flags

...

database implementation for modern hardware · 32bob black 25jane jones salery 40000 ... modern...

Documents