date: 21 august 2012 determining the regulatory asset base anthony felet – regulatory finance...
TRANSCRIPT
DATE: 21 August 2012
Determining the Regulatory Asset Base
Anthony Felet – Regulatory Finance Specialist
1
Agenda
1. Understanding the RAB
2. Asset Valuation – different approaches
3. Practical challenges with MEA/DORC
4. Suggested approach for MYPD 3
Starting value
Rolled forward mechanism
Works in progress
2
Understanding the RAB
• The Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) comprises of the value of the property, plant and equipment used to provide the regulated services
• Typically regulators apply the following principles for RAB:
Includes only assets necessary to provide regulated services
Based on the residual (depreciated) value of fixed assets
May include allowance for net working capital
Any capital contributions (external funding, subsidies) from customers or government/government agencies are excluded
• For capital intensive regulated entities, the RAB multiplied by the cost of capital will comprise a significant portion of the revenue allowance
Accordingly, a high level of scrutiny of its value is required at each MYPD
3
The RAB in tariff determination
4
Opex Capital costs
Revenue Requirement
Regulatory Asset
Base (RAB)
Rate of Return
(WACC)
Revenue Requirements = Opex + Depreciation + (RAB @ Rate of Return)
Operation and
MaintenanceManpower Primary energy Return on AssetsDepreciation
Components of the RAB
Regulatory
Asset
Base
Existing Assets
New
Investments
RAB roll forward
/ revenue re-setting
Depreciation
Capital Contribution
Working
Capital
Construction
Works in
Progress
RAB Closing Value =
RAB Opening Value
+ Investments
– Depreciation
– Asset Disposal
+/- Change of Working Capital
+/-Change of Capital Contribution
5
Asset valuation approaches
Cost based approaches are appropriate for regulatory tariff purposes, however, the lower bound should reflect deprival value
Wide range of valuations are possible!
Asset Valuation Methods
Cost based Value based
IHC DRCHC DORC/MEADCF
value
Deprival
value
Market value
6
Practical challenges with RC/DORC/MEA
• Requires a degree of subjective judgement:
The appropriate level of capacity
The technology to be assumed for replacement
Criteria to be used to optimise the assets
The extent to which the assets are aggregated
• Requires considerable input in terms of manpower and financial costs - require expert advice e.g. from engineers and valuation experts
• Given the above:
High likelihood that MEA/DORC values will vary significantly from one valuation firm to the next, one control period to the next
Difficult in assessing whether redundant assets have been excluded from the RAB
Information asymmetry that regulators normally operate under makes regular and robust MEA valuation unviable and unrealistic
7
Suggested approach for MYPD 3
• What is the appropriate starting point for MYPD 3?
Recorded values in asset register uplifted to movements to inflation
An independent DORC valuation, excluding redundant assets
Present market valuation
• RAB should be rolled forward from one MYPD period to the next according to:
Actual capex and depreciation
Movements in the US electricity capital cost index (adjusted for $US/ZAR exchange rate movements)
Working capital movements
Works in progress excluding capitalised interest
8