david aldridge principal lecturer, philosophy of education programme lead: professional education...

17
David Aldridge Principal Lecturer, Philosophy of Education Programme Lead: Professional Education Courses Oxford Brookes University [email protected] @zudensachen @BrookesBAEd http://davealdridge.brookesb logs.net/ Critical Religious Education for the Primary Classroom

Upload: frederick-allison

Post on 18-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

David Aldridge

Principal Lecturer, Philosophy of Education

Programme Lead: Professional Education Courses

Oxford Brookes University

[email protected]

@zudensachen

@BrookesBAEd

http://davealdridge.brookesblogs.net/

Critical Religious Education for the Primary Classroom

Edition Wars

“This revised version of Dungeons and Dragons is compatible with all previously released material”

Ontology - an account of what happens when learning (understanding) goes on in the encounter with religions

Good learning is left untouched by this account: hearing and telling stories, responding to and creating images and other art, role play; offering an ‘orientation’ for these activities/ processes

However, this is not the same as the claim that you can ‘mix and match’ pedagogy

Aldridge, D (2012) ‘Schemes of Work and Lesson Planning’ in Barnes, L P (ed) Debates in Religious Education, Abingdon and New York: Routledge

Softening the Edges

Influenced by the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer

Emphasis on the moment of understanding as a transformative event (ontological) rather than the acquisition of knowledge or skills or (solely) making ‘judgements’ (epistemological)

Emphasis on dialogue rather than argument or debate

BUT

Participants in dialogue (rather than e.g. a conversation) allow themselves to be conducted by the subject matter

The event of understanding entails an orientation toward truth; truth is always at issue/ at stake in RE

Common Objections

1.An emphasis on questions of truth creates conflict and damages community cohesion

2.Questions of truth do not exhaust the subject matter of RE

3.Encouraging young students to question the truth of their own and others’ deeply held beliefs creates anxiety

4.Critical RE is too challenging for my students

Three Principles

1.The Text is a Teacher

2.No Meaning without Truth

3.Understanding is an Event of Belonging

The Text is a Teacher

What can a student ‘learn

from’ this image?

For further discussion see:

http://prezi.com/z2rs0cqoyy-2/religion-and-subject-matter/

The Text is a Teacher

Student Text

Subject Matter

OBJECT OF STUDY

No Meaning without Truth

Student Text

Subject Matter

OBJECT OF STUDY

Understanding is an Event of Belonging

How to teach the story of the sacrifice of Isaac?

What is the subject matter?

What are students’ perspectives?

How to ensure that student , teacher and text ‘belong’ to the subject matter, or that an event of

mutual belonging occurs?

Understanding is an Event of Belonging

Student Text

Subject Matter

OBJECT OF STUDY

Common Objections

1.An emphasis on questions of truth creates conflict and damages community cohesion

2.Questions of truth do not exhaust the subject matter of RE

3.Encouraging young students to question the truth of their own and others’ deeply held beliefs creates anxiety

4.Critical RE is too challenging for my students

References

Aldridge, D (2011) 'What is religious education all about? A hermeneutic reappraisal?', Journal of Beliefs and Values 32:1, 33-45 Aldridge, D (2012) ‘Schemes of Work and Lesson Planning’ in Barnes, L P (ed) Debates in Religious Education, Abingdon and New York: RoutledgeAldridge, D (2013) 'The logical Priority of the Question: R G Collingwood, Philosophical Hermeneutics and Enquiry-Based Learning', Journal of Philosophy of Education, 71-85Aldridge, D (2013) REOnline Banquet: What is Faith?, REOnline, available at http://www.reonline.org.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Banq-Chr_Jud-0001-Res2-Abraham-Cards-v01a.pdfAldridge, D (2014) A Hermeneutics of Religious Education, London and New York: Bloomsbury

References

Gadamer, H-G (2004) Truth and Method, trans Weinsheimer, J and Marshall, D G, London and New York: Continuum [original German publication 1960]Hella, E and Wright, A (2009) ‘Learning ‘about’ and ‘from’ religion: phenomenography, the Variation Theory of Learning and religious education in Finland and the UK’, British Journal of Religious Education, 31:1, 53-64Hookway, S (2002) ‘Mirrors, windows, conversations: religious education for the millennial generation in England and Wales’, British Journal of Religious Education 24:2, 99-110 Hookway, S (2004) Questions of Truth: Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Secondary RE, Religious and Moral Education PressWright, A (2000) ‘’The Spiritual Education Project: Cultivating Spiritual and Religious Literacy through a Critical Pedagogy of Religious Education’ in Grimmitt, M (ed) Pedagogies of Religious Education, Great Wakering: McCrimmon, 170-187

Following it up...

Consider pursuing MA, EdD and PhD study in hermeneutics, religious education or critical RE at Oxford Brookes University:

MA Education, MA Childhoodhttp://www.brookes.ac.uk/studying-at-brookes/courses/postgraduate/2013/education/

http://www.brookes.ac.uk/studying-at-brookes/courses/postgraduate/2013/childhood-studies/

EdD http://www.education.brookes.ac.uk/research/degrees/edd/

PhDhttp://www.education.brookes.ac.uk/research/degrees/