david duncan’s fmri & eeg results
DESCRIPTION
David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results. Working memory task. cue stimuli. delay. response. 1 sec. 1 sec. 1 sec. 1 sec. 8 sec. 1 sec. Remember Faces Ignore Scenes. +. Remember Scenes Ignore Faces. +. Passively View. +. • Equivalent perceptual, bottom-up information. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results
![Page 2: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
cue stimulicue stimuli deladelayy
responsresponsee
+Remember FacesRemember FacesIgnore ScenesIgnore Scenes
1 sec1 sec 1 sec1 sec 1 sec1 sec 1 sec1 sec 8 sec8 sec 1 sec1 sec
+Remember ScenesRemember ScenesIgnore FacesIgnore Faces
Passively ViewPassively View +
Working memory taskWorking memory task
• Equivalent perceptual, bottom-up information.• Equivalent perceptual, bottom-up information.• Differences in activity mediated by top-down signals.• Differences in activity mediated by top-down signals.
![Page 3: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Face MemoryFace Memory
Response TimeResponse TimeResponse TimeResponse Time
fMRI Working Memory fMRI Working Memory PerformancePerformance
AccuracyAccuracyAccuracyAccuracy
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Accuracy
Scene Scene MemoryMemory
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Response time (seconds)
Face MemoryFace Memory Scene Scene MemoryMemory
YoungerDDOlder
![Page 4: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Accuracy
Face MemoryFace Memory
Response TimeResponse TimeResponse TimeResponse Time
EEG Working Memory EEG Working Memory PerformancePerformance
AccuracyAccuracyAccuracyAccuracy
Scene Scene MemoryMemory
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Response time (seconds)
Face MemoryFace Memory Scene Scene MemoryMemory
YoungerDDOlder
![Page 5: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Remember ScenesRemember Scenes Ignore ScenesIgnore Scenes
Scene-selective Area Scene-selective Area ModulationModulation
Gazzaley, A. Gazzaley, A. et al.et al. Journal of Cognitive Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Neuroscience (2005)(2005)
Remember Remember ScenesScenes
IgnoreIgnoreScenesScenes
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
BOLD signal
BOLD SignalBOLD SignalBOLD SignalBOLD Signalp <.001
EnhancementEnhancement
Suppression Suppression
PassivePassiveViewView
![Page 6: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
OlderOlderYoungerYounger
Participants = 18 subjectsParticipants = 18 subjects
Age = 23.5 years (19-30)Age = 23.5 years (19-30)
Education = 15.6 years (12-19)Education = 15.6 years (12-19)
Normal AgingNormal Aging
Participants = 18 subjectsParticipants = 18 subjects
Age = 67 years (60-77)Age = 67 years (60-77)
Education = 15.4 years (12-19)Education = 15.4 years (12-19)
Older subjects reflect “normal” agingOlder subjects reflect “normal” aging
No medications, depression, dementia
Equivalent to age-matched controls on 11 tests ofexecutive & memory function
![Page 7: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
BOLD signal
RemembeRemember r
ScenesScenes
IgnoreIgnoreScenesScenes
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
BOLD signal
PassivePassiveViewView
Younger (19-30 y.o.)Younger (19-30 y.o.)Younger (19-30 y.o.)Younger (19-30 y.o.) Older (60-77 y.o.)Older (60-77 y.o.)Older (60-77 y.o.)Older (60-77 y.o.)
Gazzaley, A. Gazzaley, A. et al.et al. Nature Nature Neuroscience Neuroscience (2005)(2005)
RemembeRemember r
ScenesScenes
IgnoreIgnoreScenesScenes
PassivePassiveViewView
Within-group comparisonWithin-group comparison
![Page 8: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
Normalized BOLD signal
OlderOlderYoungerYounger
SuppressionSuppressionSuppressionSuppression
Across-Group Across-Group ComparisonsComparisons
Suppression Index Suppression Index (Passive-Ignore)(Passive-Ignore)
Suppression Index Suppression Index (Passive-Ignore)(Passive-Ignore)
Enhancement Index Enhancement Index (Remember-Passive)(Remember-Passive)
Enhancement Index Enhancement Index (Remember-Passive)(Remember-Passive)
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
Normalized BOLD signal
EnhancementEnhancementEnhancementEnhancement
OlderOlderYoungerYounger
![Page 9: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Fusiform Face Area
(face-selective area)Parahippocampal Place Area
(scene-selective area)
These functionally defined regions serve as regions of interest
RL LR
![Page 10: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
BOLD signal
RemembeRemember r
ScenesScenes
IgnoreIgnoreScenesScenes
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
BOLD signal
PassivePassiveViewView
Younger (19-30 y.o.)Younger (19-30 y.o.)Younger (19-30 y.o.)Younger (19-30 y.o.) Older (60-77 y.o.) Older (60-77 y.o.) Older (60-77 y.o.) Older (60-77 y.o.)
Gazzaley, A. Gazzaley, A. et al.et al. Nature Nature Neuroscience Neuroscience (2005)(2005)
RemembeRemember r
ScenesScenes
IgnoreIgnoreScenesScenes
PassivePassiveViewView
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
BOLD signal
RemembeRemember r
ScenesScenes
IgnoreIgnoreScenesScenes
PassivePassiveViewView
David Duncan (49 y.o.)David Duncan (49 y.o.)David Duncan (49 y.o.)David Duncan (49 y.o.)
![Page 11: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
OlderOlderYoungerYounger
SuppressionSuppressionSuppressionSuppression
Top-down Index Top-down Index ComparisonsComparisons
EnhancementEnhancementEnhancementEnhancement
OlderOlderYoungerYounger
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
BOLD signal
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
BOLD signal
DavidDavidDuncanDuncan
DavidDavidDuncanDuncan
![Page 12: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Neural Basis of Top-down Neural Basis of Top-down DeficitDeficit
![Page 13: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Areas of Top-down control(Face + Scene – Passive)
![Page 14: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Quantifying Brain Volumes
![Page 15: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
EEG Behavioral Results
Accuracy: Faces Y = 90%, O = 78% (P = 0.001), DD= 83%
Scenes Y = 92%, O = 81% (P < 0.001), DD= 90%RT: Faces Y = 1381ms, O = 1673ms (P < 0.005), DD=1307 Scenes Y = 1348ms, O = 1588ms (P < 0.05), DD=1082
fMRI Behavioral Results
Accuracy: Faces Y = 95%, O = 88% (P = 0.001), DD = 95% Scenes Y = 90%, O = 83% (P < 0.001); DD = 92%
RT: Faces Y = 1193ms, O = 1302ms (NS), DD=894 Scenes Y = 1304ms, O = 1366ms (NS), DD=1191
![Page 16: David Duncan’s fMRI & EEG Results](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/56815adc550346895dc8a81a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Thanks for Thanks for your your
participatioparticipationn