david giza, stacy burnette & pam little

15
David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little Contractual Compliance Team October 2009 Registrar Stakeholder Group Constituency Meeting

Upload: gaia

Post on 15-Feb-2016

54 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Registrar Stakeholder Group Constituency Meeting . David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little. Contractual Compliance Team. October 2009. Agenda. FY 2010 Compliance Initiatives (Dave) Enforcement Activity Jan – Oct 2009 (Stacy) Whois Data Accuracy Study (Dave) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam LittleContractual Compliance Team

October 2009

Registrar Stakeholder Group Constituency Meeting  

Page 2: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Agenda

• FY 2010 Compliance Initiatives (Dave)• Enforcement Activity Jan – Oct 2009 (Stacy)• Whois Data Accuracy Study (Dave)• Privacy/Proxy Services Study (Stacy)• RDE Compliance (Pam)

October 2009

Page 3: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Team Members• David Giza, Sr. Director, Contractual Compliance

Team Leader• Pam Little, Sr. Director, Contractual Compliance,

Asia/Pacific• Stacy Burnette, Director, Contractual Compliance• Khalil Rasheed, Compliance Audit Manager• William McKelligott, Compliance Auditor• Constance Brown, Compliance Specialist

3

Page 4: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

FY 2010 Compliance Initiatives• Enforcement Actions

– Identify and pursue non-complaint registrars– Use enforcement tools in 2009 RAA– Increase breach, non-renewal and termination

notices, as necessary• Audits – Registrar contact info., IRTP, RDE

requirements, UDRP and financial compliance• Research – Complete Whois Accuracy Work

October 2009

Page 5: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Enforcement Activity (Jan - Oct 2009)

• 16 Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) Terminations and Non-Renewals– 9 Terminations– 7 Non-renewals

• 184 Breach Notices Transmitted• 4,290 Enforcement Actions • 9,304 Consumer Complaints Processed (Jan-

Sept)

October 2009

Page 6: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Common Non-Renewal and Termination Causes

• Registrars fail to comply with RDE deposit requirements

• Registrars fail to provide port 43 and web based Whois services.

• Registrars fail to pay accreditation fees

October 2009

Page 7: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Planned Registrar AuditsSchedule – 2010

January - March April - June July - SeptemberPrimary Contact Information, Phase 1

Public Contact Information, Phase 2 Non-Implementation of UDRP Arbitration Panel Decisions , Phase 2

IRTP (Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy), Phase 1 (Development)

1. IRTP, Phase 2 (Implementation)2. Non-Implementation of UDRP

Arbitration Panel Decisions, Phase 1 (Development)

RDE

1. RDE (Registrar Data Escrow)

2. Registration Agreement (with registrants)

RDE RDE

Page 8: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Whois Data Accuracy StudyVerification

• Determine proportion of domain names from the top 5 gTLDs with different levels of accuracy

• Random sample size of 2400 domain names• Accuracy defined per RAA Section 3.3.1.6 as the

correct name and a valid postal mailing address• Registrants contacted by NORC to verify ownership

of domain name• Preliminary results describe types of inaccuracies

found and barriers to accuracy

Page 9: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Whois Data Accuracy StudyThree Key Criteria

1. Is registrant’s address deliverable?

2. Can registrant’s name be linked with the address?

3. When contacted, does registrant verify/ acknowledge ownership of domain name?

Page 10: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Whois Data Accuracy StudyPreliminary Findings

• 51% of records meet all three criteria

• 80% meet at least 2/3 criteria

• 5% meet none of the criteria

Pri-vacy/proxy

do-mains, meet-ing 3/3 criteria

17%

Other do-

mains meet-ing 3/3 criteria

34%

Do-mains meet-ing 2/3 criteria

29%

Do-mains meet-ing 1/3 criteria15%

Do-mains

not meeting any of the 3

criteria5%

Page 11: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Whois Data Accuracy StudyNature of inaccuracies

• Registrant concerns about privacy• Limited requirements regarding identity,

proof of identity and proof of address• Confusion in role and meaning of registrant• Carelessness by registrant• Little value in domain name ownership • ASCII translation

Page 12: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Privacy/Proxy Registration Services Study

• Preliminary Results– 580, or about 24.7% of the 2346 domain names

analyzed, appear to have been registered using a privacy or proxy service

– Additional information contained in the draft report posted on the ICANN website at http://www.icann.org/en/compliance/reports/privacy-proxy-registration-services-study-28sep09-en.pdf

October 2009

Page 13: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

RDE Obligations

• On-boarding obligations– Enter tri-parte data escrow agreement– Make initial deposit

• On-going obligations– Make scheduled deposits– Ensure data meet specs/format

October 2009

Page 14: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Consequences for Non-Compliance

• Non-compliance = Breach of RAA Section 3.6 • Consequences

– Escalated compliance actions– Suspension (if new RAA), non-renewal or

termination– ICANN may publish list of non-compliant

registrars

October 2009

Page 15: David Giza, Stacy Burnette & Pam Little

Thank YouContractual Compliance Team

October 2009