david richerson modern ceramic engineering.pdf

846
 Use n Second Edition Revised and Expanded

Upload: andrelmv

Post on 01-Mar-2018

1.387 views

Category:

Documents


568 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    1/844

    Properties Processing and

    Use

    n

    Design

    Second

    Edition

    Revised and Expanded

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    2/844

    Contents

    Prel." to the Second Edilion

    Preface to the First Edition

    Introd.dion

    Pad

    I STRtlCfllRES

    AND PROPERTIES

    1 Atomic: Bonding, and Crystal Structure

    vii

    xi

    I

    3

    2 Crystal Chemistry

    and

    Speci6c

    Crystal

    Structures 32

    3 Phase EguUibria and

    Phue

    Equilibrium Diagrams

    71

    4 PbysicaJ and }bennal Behavior

    123

    Mrtblola Bcbuior and Measurement 162

    6

    EI.dr i r l

    Behayio[

    204

    1 Dieledric

    t

    Magnetic. and Optical Behavior

    1S1

    8 Time, Temperature, and Environmental Elred

    on PropeJ1Jes

    313

    Part II PROCF,sSING OF CERAMICS

    7

    9 Powder Processing

    10 ShapeFonnlllR Processes

    J

    1

    D nqf in l inn

    12 Final Macbining

    13

    Quality

    Assurance

    pad II DESIGN WITH

    CERAMICS

    14 DesI n Considerations

    15

    Deslp

    Approaches

    6

    FaOure

    Analysis

    17 TougbeDing of Ceramics

    18 AppUalions: Material Selection

    Glossary

    EWed:ive

    Ionic

    Radii (or CalioD'

    aod

    AniOBS

    periodic

    Table

    of

    the

    Elements

    lode

    x

    374

    418

    519

    5%

    ZO

    649

    651

    662

    680

    731

    808

    833

    843

    851

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    3/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    4/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    5/844

    4

    Chapter 1

    The

    second

    shell

    has eight electron

    s. two

    in s o

    rbital

    s and

    six in orb itals.

    All h

    ave

    higher energy than

    th

    e two electrons

    in th

    e

    first

    she

    ll

    and are in

    orbitals farther from the nucleus For

    in

    stance the s orbitals of the second

    shell of lithium have a spherical probability distribution at about 3

    A

    radius.

    he

    p orb

    it

    als are not sphe

    ri

    cal. but have dumbbell-shaped probability di s

    tributions along the orthogonal axes

    as

    shown in Fi

    g.

    1.1. These electrons

    have

    sl

    ightly

    hi

    gh

    er

    energy than

    s

    electrons of the same she

    ll

    and are

    in

    pairs

    with oppos

    it

    e sp

    in

    s along each ax is when the she ll is full.

    he

    third quantum shell has d orbitals

    in

    addition to sand

    p

    orbital

    s

    A

    f

    ull

    d orbital conta

    in

    s

    10

    electrons. he fourth and fifth she lls contain f orbitals

    in

    addition to

    s

    p and d orbitals. A

    full

    f orbital contains

    14

    e lectrons.

    A s

    imple notation

    isused

    to

    show the electron configuration swithin s

    hell

    s.

    to show the relative energy of the electrons and thus

    to

    s

    how

    the order

    in

    which th

    e electrons can

    be added to or removed

    from ana

    tom during bond

    ing

    This notation can best be illu st rated by a few examples

    Example 1 1 Oxygen

    ha

    s eight e lectrons and h

    as the

    electron notation

    Is 2s 2p .

    h

    e I and 2 preceding the

    nd

    p designate the quantum shell.

    the

    nd

    p designate the subshe ll wi thin each quantum she ll . and the s

    u-

    perscripts

    designate the total

    number of

    electrons in

    each

    s

    ub

    shell. For oxygen

    the Is a

    nd

    2s subshells are both full . but the 2p subshell is two electrons short

    of being full.

    Example 1 2 As

    the

    a

    tomi

    c

    number and

    th

    e

    number

    of electrons

    increase

    the energy

    difference

    between electrons

    and

    be tween s

    hell

    s decreases and

    over

    lp

    between quantum

    gro

    ups

    occurs.

    For example the 45 subs

    hell

    o iron

    lill

    s before the

    d

    subshe ll is full. This is shown

    in

    the electron notation by

    Figure 1 1 Elec tron probability distributions for p orbital

    s. he

    hi ghes t probability

    electron

    pos itions are along

    the

    orthogon

    al

    axes wo electrons

    each

    with opposite

    spin. are associated

    with

    each axis.

    resulting

    in a to tal of

    six

    el

    ect

    rons if

    all th

    e

    orbitals in th e shell are filled

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    6/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    7/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    8/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    9/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    10/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    11/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    12/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    13/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    14/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    15/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    16/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    17/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    18/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    19/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    20/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    21/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    22/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    23/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    24/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    25/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    26/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    27/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    28/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    29/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    30/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    31/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    32/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    33/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    34/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    35/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    36/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    37/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    38/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    39/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    40/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    41/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    42/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    43/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    44/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    45/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    46/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    47/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    48/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    49/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    50/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    51/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    52/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    53/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    54/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    55/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    56/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    57/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    58/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    59/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    60/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    61/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    62/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    63/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    64/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    65/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    66/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    67/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    68/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    69/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    70/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    71/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    72/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    73/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    74/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    75/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    76/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    77/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    78/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    79/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    80/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    81/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    82/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    83/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    84/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    85/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    86/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    87/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    88/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    89/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    90/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    91/844

    9

    Chapter 3

    .

    ,

    .

    Figure 3.18 Transmission electron micrograph showing

    an

    example o liquid

    im-

    miscibility. Courtesy of D Uhlmann. University of Arizona .)

    olymorphism

    Polymorphic transformations are also shown on phase equilibrium dia-

    grams Figure 3 20a is a schematic of a binary eutectic diagram with no

    solid solution and with three different polymorphs o the A composition

    he different polymorphs are usually designated

    by

    letters of the greek

    alphabet. Figure 3.20b

    is

    a schematic

    o

    a binary eutectic diagram with

    three A polymorphs. each with partial solid solution of

    B

    Figure 3.21 illustrates a real binary system with polymorphs. Poly

    morphic

    transformations are

    also

    present in Fig

    3 19

    Three-Component Systems

    A three-component system is referred

    to

    as a

    terti ry

    sysfem The addition

    o a third component increases the complexity o the system and o the

    phase equilibrium diagram. he phase rule becomes = 3 - P 2 =

    5 - P

    As

    with binary ceramic

    systems. diagrams

    are usually drawn with

    pressure as a constant condensed system). he phase rule for the con-

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    92/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    93/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    94/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    95/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    96/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    97/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    98/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    99/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    100/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    101/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    102/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    103/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    104/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    105/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    106/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    107/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    108/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    109/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    110/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    111/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    112/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    113/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    114/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    115/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    116/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    117/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    118/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    119/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    120/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    121/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    122/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    123/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    124/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    125/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    126/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    127/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    128/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    129/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    130/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    131/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    132/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    133/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    134/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    135/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    136/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    137/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    138/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    139/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    140/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    141/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    142/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    143/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    144/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    145/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    146/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    147/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    148/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    149/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    150/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    151/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    152/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    153/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    154/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    155/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    156/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    157/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    158/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    159/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    160/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    161/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    162/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    163/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    164/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    165/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    166/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    167/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    168/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    169/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    170/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    171/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    172/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    173/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    174/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    175/844

    174

    Chapter 5

    Figure

    5 S

    Scanning electron photomicrographs of fracture surfaces of reaction-

    bonded silicon nitride containing nearly spherical pores resulting from air entrap-

    ment during processing Arrows outline flaw dimensions used to calculate fracture

    stress

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    176/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    177/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    178/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    179/844

    178

    Chapter 5

    < ,

    1

    Figure 5.7 Typical ceramic tensile test specimen configuration.

    Another method of

    obtaining tensile strength

    of

    a ceramic material s

    known as the theta test [18]. The configuration

    s

    shown n Fig. 5.6c.

    Applicaton

    of

    a compressive load to

    the

    two arches

    produces

    a uniaxial

    tensile stress n the crossbeam. Very little testing has been conducted with

    this configuration owing largely

    to

    difficulty

    n

    specimen fabrication.

    ompressive Strength

    Compressive strength

    s the

    crushing strength of a material as shown n

    Fig. 5.6f.

    t

    s

    rarely measured for metals . but

    s

    commonly

    measured

    for

    ceramics. especially those

    that

    must support structural loads. such as re-

    fractory brick or building brick. Because the compressive strength of a

    ceramic material s usually much higher than the tensile strength t s often

    beneficial to design a ceramic

    component

    so that it supports heavy loads

    n compression rather than tension . In fact. n some applications the ce-

    ramic material s prestressed in a state of compression to give it increased

    resistance to tensile loads that will be imposed during service. The residual

    compressive stresses must first be overcome by tensile stresses

    before

    ad-

    ditional tensile stress can build up to break the ceramic Concrete pre-

    stressed with steel bars

    s

    one

    example . Safety glass

    s

    another

    example.

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    180/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    181/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    182/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    183/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    184/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    185/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    186/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    187/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    188/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    189/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    190/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    191/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    192/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    193/844

    192

    Chapter 5

    crew dislocation

    Figure 5.16 Simple schematic

    ill

    ust rating a screw dislocation.

    From

    Ref. 7. p.

    92 . )

    the structure is

    distorted and

    und

    er

    localized s

    tr

    ess even when the overall

    material is not under an app

    li

    ed stress. This residual stress state can be

    visua

    li

    zed y examining Fig. 5.17.

    The

    dislocation ]jne extends into the

    structure perpendicular

    to

    the

    su

    rf

    ace

    of

    the

    page. Note that the

    str

    ucture

    is

    distorted so as to

    fill in

    the space

    of

    the missing half-plane of atom

    s

    This results in a state of residual tens ile stress just below the ext ra plane

    of

    atoms ba lanced y compressive stress

    in

    the region above

    th

    e di slocation.

    The presence

    of

    the disloca

    ti

    ons and the associated residual st

    re ss

    allows slip

    to

    occur a long atom planes at a fraction of the 2 value

    th

    at

    Zone of compressive stress

    Zone of

    t nsil str ss

    E

    Figure 5.17 Schematic of the residual st ress state showing compressive stress

    above the dislocation and tensile stress below the dislocation. I ASM

    In

    te rna

    tional. )

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    194/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    195/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    196/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    197/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    198/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    199/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    200/844

    igure5.23 Crystal structure of A I ~ o \ showing complex paths O

    -

    a

    nd

    Alh ions must follow to allow slip to occur under an

    applied stress From

    W

    D. Kingery et

    al lntroduction

    o

    Ceramics

    2nd ed .. Wil ey. New York.

    1976

    .

    p

    732.)

    ;

    .

    =

    '

    .

    =

    ;

    3

    -

    g

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    201/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    202/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    203/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    204/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    205/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    206/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    207/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    208/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    209/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    210/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    211/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    212/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    213/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    214/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    215/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    216/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    217/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    218/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    219/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    220/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    221/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    222/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    223/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    224/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    225/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    226/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    227/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    228/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    229/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    230/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    231/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    232/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    233/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    234/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    235/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    236/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    237/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    238/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    239/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    240/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    241/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    242/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    243/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    244/844

    Electrical Behavior

    43

    Figure 6.23 Example

    of

    the Meissner effect showing the levitation

    of

    a magnet

    at liquid nitrogen temperature by YBa u .t01., ceramic superconductor. (Courtesy

    Ceramatec. Inc .)

    The response of the superconductive material to the amount of current

    being carried

    or

    to an applied magnetic field is also very important. Too

    high a current density or magnetic field can destroy the superconductive

    behavior. Each material has a different response.

    Evolution of Superconductor Materials

    Figure 6.24 shows the historical progression in discovery o super ondu tive

    materials with higher T . Progress was extremely slow up to 1986, averaging

    about 4 K per decade . Initial materials identified to be superconductive

    were elemental metals (Hg, Pb, Nb), followed primarily

    by

    solid solutions

    (NbTi) and intermetallics (Nb,Sn , V,

    Si

    ,

    Nb

    ,G e). Until the early 1960's,

    relatively few materials had been identified with superconductive behavior.

    Superconductivity was thought to be

    an

    anomalous property . Since

    96

    techniques have been avai lable to achieve temperatures closer to absolute

    zero (on the order of 0.0002

    K

    a

    nd

    to simultaneously apply high pressure.

    Under these conditions many more elements, so lid solutions, intermetal

    lics, and ceramics have been demonstrated to have superconductivity.

    Several ceramic compositions were identified to be superconductive.

    These included tungsten, molybdenum, and rhenium

    "bronze" composi

    tions A,WO A,MoO .. and A,RhO where A was Na,

    K,

    b , Cs, NH

    Ca, Sr, Ba, etc.; oxygen-deficient SrTiO

    J

    and LiTi0

    3

    ; and BaPb, _Bi O

    J

    .

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    245/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    246/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    247/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    248/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    249/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    250/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    251/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    252/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    253/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    254/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    255/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    256/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    257/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    258/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    259/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    260/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    261/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    262/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    263/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    264/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    265/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    266/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    267/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    268/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    269/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    270/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    271/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    272/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    273/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    274/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    275/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    276/844

    Dieleclric. Magnelic Optical Behavior

    275

    equal probability

    of

    shifting

    in

    s

    ix

    directions toward

    one

    of

    the

    corners

    of

    the

    octahedron.

    As

    a result. the tetragonal crystal contains

    some

    dipoles

    in one

    portion

    of

    the crystal pointing

    in

    one direction whereas others

    in

    another portion may point

    in

    a direction

    9

    0

    or

    18

    0

    away from the first.

    A region of the crystal

    in

    which the dipoles are aligned

    in

    a common

    direction is called a

    domain.

    An example of

    BaTiO

    .

    1

    with a ferroelectric

    domain with aligned dipoles is illustrated in Fig. 7.18.

    Le t us return now to Fig. 7.16 and describe what happens

    in

    a ferroe-

    lectric crystal such as tetragonal BaTiO, when an electric field is applied.

    The ferroelectric domains are randomly oriented prior to application of

    the electric field, that is, at

    E 0,

    the net polarization equals zero

    P,,, 0).

    As we apply an electric field and increase the electric field, the domains

    begin to move in the

    aTiO

    .\

    and

    align parallel to the applied field . This

    results

    in an

    increase

    in

    net polarization along line OA. The polarization

    reache s a saturation value

    8)

    when all the domains are aligned

    in

    the

    direction

    of

    the field. If

    we

    now redu

    ce

    the electric field to zero many

    of

    the domains will remain aligned

    such

    that a

    remanent polarization P,)

    exists.

    Interpolation

    of

    the line

    8e

    until it intersects the polarization

    axis

    gives a value P

    J

    which is referred

    to as

    the spontaneous polarization. f

    we

    now reverse

    the

    electric field

    we

    force domains to begin to switch

    direction. When enough domains switch the domains

    in

    one direction

    balance

    the

    domains in the opposite direction

    and

    result in zero net

    po

    Figure 7.18 TEM image of

    180

    0

    ferroelectric domain

    s

    in

    a

    single grain of

    BaTiO,. Courtesy of W. E Lee, University of Sheffield.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    277/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    278/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    279/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    280/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    281/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    282/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    283/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    284/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    285/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    286/844

    Dielectric , Magnetic , Oplical Behavior

    85

    Another importa

    nt

    wave-generation application is the sonic delay line.

    A delay line consists of a so lid b r or rod of a sound-transmitting material

    glass , ce ram ic, metal) with a transduce r attached to each end. An electric

    signal that is to be delayed is input to the first transdu

    ce

    r. The signal

    is

    converted to a sonic wave impulse that travels along the sound-transmitting

    waveguide. The sonic impulse is

    th

    en converted back to

    n

    electrical

    impulse by the second transducer. The delay results because a sonic wave

    travels much more slow ly than elec trons passing through a wire . The time

    of delay is controlled by the length of the waveguide. Delay lines are used

    extensively in milit ry electronics gear a

    nd

    in color te levision sets. One

    exa

    mpl

    e

    is

    radar systems to co

    mp

    a

    re

    informa

    ti

    o n from one echo with the

    next echo and for range calibration.

    The wave-generation applications

    di

    scussed

    so

    f r

    involve acoustic

    waves transmitted through bulk media. Additional freedom exists

    in

    the

    Figure 7.25 Piezoelectric ceramics nd assemb es for a variety of applications.

    (Co

    urt

    esy E O Corporation.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    287/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    288/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    289/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    290/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    291/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    292/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    293/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    294/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    295/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    296/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    297/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    298/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    299/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    300/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    301/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    302/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    303/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    304/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    305/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    306/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    307/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    308/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    309/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    310/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    311/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    312/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    313/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    314/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    315/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    316/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    317/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    318/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    319/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    320/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    321/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    322/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    323/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    324/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    325/844

    324

    Chapler 8

    -

    .

    Figure 8.7 Hot pressed specimen deformed by creep under a load of 276

    MPa

    40.000 ps

    i)

    at

    llOOOC

    (-2200

    F) for

    50

    hr.

    mechanisms available for crack growth. Crack growth is relatively easy i

    the

    grain

    boundaries

    o

    the

    material

    are

    coated

    with

    a gl

    ass

    phase. At

    high

    temperature localized creep of

    this

    glass

    can

    occur resulting

    in

    grain

    boundary sliding. Figure 8.8(a) shows the fracture surface of an

    NC-132

    hot pressed

    Si

    J

    N

    4

    specimen

    that fractured

    after 2.2

    min under

    a static

    bending load of 276 MPa (40,000 psi) al

    - llOO C

    (- 2000 F).

    he

    initial

    flaw was probably a shallow (20

    10

    40

    pm

    machining crack.

    t

    linked up

    with cracks formed

    by grain boundary sliding

    and

    separation

    and

    pores

    formed by triple-point cavitation

    to

    produce the new

    Haw

    or structurally

    weakened region seen

    in

    Fig

    8.8

    as the large

    semicircular

    area

    extending

    inward from

    the tensile surface. This was the effective

    flaw

    size at

    fracture

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    326/844

    Time, Temperature, Environmental Effects on Properties 325

    Figure 8.8 Comparison of a slow crack growth fracture versus a normal bend

    fracture for hot-pre

    ssed

    Si

    .

    1

    N From Ref. 9.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    327/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    328/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    329/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    330/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    331/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    332/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    333/844

    .-..

    -.

    .

    ..... ;

    - -

    .:. .:-: .

    ...

    . -

    .

    : : : ; :;:

    b

    )

    (a)

    d)

    (e)

    Figure 8.11 Surfaces of hot-pressed Si)N. before and after oxidation. a) As_machined surface, 32O-gril diamo nd; b) oxidized

    in air for 50 hr al 98O C l

    8OO

    F); c) oxidized

    in

    air fo r 24 hr at 12 ) rC (22OO F); and d) oxidized in air for 24 hr at 137O C

    (25OO F) . C ASM International.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    334/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    335/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    336/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    337/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    338/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    339/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    340/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    341/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    342/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    343/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    344/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    345/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    346/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    347/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    348/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    349/844

    348

    ~

    igure 8.23 Reaction-bonded

    S i l ~

    after exposure

    in

    a combustion rig with

    5

    ppm sea

    salt addition for 25 cycles

    of

    1.5 hr at 900C 0.5 hr at

    1120

    C and a

    5-min air-blast quench. a) , b), and c)

    show the fracture surface

    at

    increasing

    magnification and illustrate the glassy

    buildup

    in the

    region

    of

    combustion gas

    impingement. From Ref. 9.

    Chapter 8

    as fouling A thin buildup can protect

    th

    e surface from corrosion and

    erosion and in some cases can even result in a local temperature reduction.

    All three

    of

    these factors can increase the life of a component especially

    a metal. However, a thick buildup reduces the airflow through the engine

    and

    decreases efficiency

    Fouling is an inherent

    problem

    in

    the direct burning

    of coal. A variety

    of

    approaches have been or arc being studied to resolve this problem:

    L Intermittent removal of buildup by thermal shock, melt-off,

    or

    passing abrasive material such as nutshells) through

    the

    system

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    350/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    351/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    352/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    353/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    354/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    355/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    356/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    357/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    358/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    359/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    360/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    361/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    362/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    363/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    364/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    365/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    366/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    367/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    368/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    369/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    370/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    371/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    372/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    373/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    374/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    375/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    376/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    377/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    378/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    379/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    380/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    381/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    382/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    383/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    384/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    385/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    386/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    387/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    388/844

    388

    Chapter 9

    Figure 9.4 Si.N

    J

    grinding media showi

    ng

    one of the common configurations.

    Spheres are also commo

    nl

    y used. Courtesy KemaNord.)

    wear-resistant linings and have

    been

    used successfully with dry milling and

    with

    water

    as a milling fluid.

    However

    . some milling is conducted with

    organic fluids that may att ack ru bber or polyurethane . Very

    hard

    grinding

    media can reduce

    contamination

    because they wear more slow l

    y w

    is

    goo

    d for

    some

    cases

    because

    its high

    hardness

    reduces

    wear

    a nd its high

    specific gravity minimizes milling tim

    e.

    f

    contamination from the media

    is a n especially critical

    consideration

    milling can be

    conducted

    with media

    made of th e sa me compos ition as the powder being mill

    ed.

    Another ap-

    proach

    is to

    mill with st

    eel

    media

    a

    nd

    remove

    the

    contamination

    by acid

    leaching.

    Milling can be

    conduc

    t

    ed either

    dry or wet. The

    advantages

    a

    nd

    dis-

    adva

    ntages

    are listed

    in

    Table

    9 5

    Dry

    milling has

    the

    adva

    nt

    age

    that

    the

    resulting p

    owde

    r d

    oes not have

    to be

    separa

    ted from a liquid . The

    major

    concern

    in

    dry

    milling is

    that

    the p

    owde

    r d

    oes not

    pack in the

    corners of

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    389/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    390/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    391/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    392/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    393/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    394/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    395/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    396/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    397/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    398/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    399/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    400/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    401/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    402/844

    402

    Chapter 9

    Figure 9.10 Transmission electron microscope image o ultrafin L < i < I ~ r

    powder prepared y the glycine-nitrate process. Courtesy o Larry Chick. Battelle

    Northwest Laboratories, Richland . Wash .)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    403/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    404/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    405/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    406/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    407/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    408/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    409/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    410/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    411/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    412/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    413/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    414/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    415/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    416/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    417/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    418/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    419/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    420/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    421/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    422/844

    422

    Chapter

    1

    100

    I m

    Figure 10.3 Photo taken with a scanning electron microscope showing the spher

    ical morphology

    of

    spray-dried powder. Courtesy Cerarnalec, Inc.)

    closest possible packing; and (2) to minimi

    ze

    friction and allow all regions

    of the compact to receive equivalent pressure. Let

    us

    discuss these in more

    detail and examine some examples

    inders and Plasticiz ers

    Table 9.13 listed a variety

    of

    organic and inorganic materials that have

    been

    used

    as binders . Most binders and pla

    st

    icizers are organic They

    coat

    the ceramic particles and provide lubrication during pressing and a tem

    porar

    y bond after pressing. The amount

    of

    organic binder required for

    pressing

    is

    quite low, typically ranging from 0.5 to 5 wt

    .

    Organic binders

    normally are decomposed during the high-temperature densification step

    and evolved as gases. ome binders leave a carbon residue, especialty if

    fired under reducing conditions.

    Inorganic binders also exist. The clay minerals such as kaolinite are a

    good example. Kaolinite has a layered structure and interacts with water

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    423/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    424/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    425/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    426/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    427/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    428/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    429/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    430/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    431/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    432/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    433/844

    Shape-Forming Processes

    ressed

    shape

    owder

    required

    433

    Figure

    10_11

    Schematic illustrating the different distances a punch must move to

    accomplish uniform compaction

    of

    the powder. Based on a powder

    wi

    th

    a com

    paction ratio of 2: 1

    10

    ASM International.)

    plastically during pressing and conforms to the contour of the die cavity.

    The pressed shape usually contains flash (thin sheets of material at edges

    where the material extruded between the die parts) and can deform after

    pressing if not handled carefully. For these reasons, wet pressing

    is

    not

    well-suited to automation. Also. dimensional tolerances are usually only

    held to

    : :2

    .

    Uniaxial ressing roblems

    The following are some

    of the

    problems that can be encountered with

    uniaxial pressing.

    improper density or size

    die wear

    cracking

    density variation.

    The

    first

    two are easy to detect

    by

    simple measurements on the green

    compact immediately after pressing. Improper density or size are often

    associated with off-specification powder batches and are therefore relatively

    easy to resolve.

    ie

    wear shows up as progressive change

    in

    dimensions.

    t shou

    ld

    also be routinely handled

    by

    the process specification and quality

    control.

    he source of cracking may be more difficult to locate. t may be due

    to improper die design.

    air

    entrapment, rebound during ejection from the

    die. die-wall friction, die wear, or other causes. Often a crack initiates at

    the top edge of the part during pressure release or ejection of the part.

    Two mechanisms of this type cracking are illustrated

    in

    Fig. 10.13. he

    first, shown in Fig. 1O.13(a), occurs as pressure is released from the upper

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    434/844

    434

    o Powder

    e Rig d Ole Parts

    I Z2l Moving Ole Parts

    Chapter

    1

    Figure 10 12

    Schematic o tooling to uniaxially press a three-level part. ASM

    International.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    435/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    436/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    437/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    438/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    439/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    440/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    441/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    442/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    443/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    444/844

    444

    Chapter 10

    Figure 10.21 Ceramic parts formed

    y

    uniaxial and isostatic pressing, some with

    gree n machinin

    g

    (Co

    urt esy Western

    Gold

    and Platinum

    Company,

    S

    ub

    sidiary

    of

    GTE Sylvania. Inc.

    10.2 CASTING

    When most people hea r the term casting. they automatically think

    of

    meta l casting in which a shape is for med by po uring molten metal into a

    mo

    ld

    . A limited a

    mount of

    cas ting of molten ceramics is

    done

    in the

    preparation

    of

    high-density p and AI,O

    1

    ZrO, refractories

    and in

    prep

    ara tion

    of

    some abrasive materials . In the latter case, casting from a melt

    into cool

    ed

    metal plates produces rapid quenching, which r

    es

    ults

    in

    very

    fine crystal size that imparts high toughness to the materia

    l

    The technique

    of cas ting molten ceramic refractories is called fusion cas ing.

    More frequently. the casting of ceramics is done by a room-temperature

    operation in w

    hi

    ch ceramic particles suspended in a liquid are cast into a

    porous mold that removes the liquid and leaves a pa rt iculate compact in

    the mo ld . T here are a num ber of vari a

    ti

    ons to this process. depending on

    the viscosity

    of

    the ceramic-liquid suspension. the mold , and the procedures

    used. The most common is refe rred to as slip casling. The principles and

    contro ls for slip cas ting a re similar to those of the other particul ate ceramic

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    445/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    446/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    447/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    448/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    449/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    450/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    451/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    452/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    453/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    454/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    455/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    456/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    457/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    458/844

    -

    u

    i

    0

    u

    0

    :;

    458

    1000

    C

    100

    70Wt. %

    solids

    0.05 0.1

    0.2 0.

    25

    Volume % dispersant

    R.glon A

    MonazollneT

    Monazoline-C

    SedisperseO

    Zany

    FSN

    MonazollneQ

    Wilconol H31A

    Flourad FC-170-C

    Region B

    Wileamlne PA78B

    Monawet MM80

    Aerosol AYl00

    Aerosol

    C 61

    Monawel

    MB

    45

    Manawa MO 70

    OlsperslnotC

    R,glone

    Menhaden fish all

    Emphos PS

    - 2 A

    ZonylA

    Chapter 10

    I

    I AMP-95

    I Alkazlne-TO

    I Alkazlne-O

    Emeras 2423

    I Dispersinot-HP

    I

    SedlsperseF

    I

    I

    I

    Orewfax.()()7

    I Aerosol.()T

    I

    Ouponol.a

    pva

    I Aerosol TR-70

    I Amerlate LFA

    I

    Figure 10.32 Summary o the effect of the dispersants listed

    in

    Table 10.6 on the

    viscosity

    of slips

    consisting

    of

    BaTiO) in

    a MEK-ethanol so lvent.

    Adapted from

    Ref.

    12_

    These are referred to

    as

    non queous nonwater-ba sed). Another non

    aqueous system utilizes trichloroethylene plus ethanol. Nonaqueous sys-

    tems work well with steric hindrance because they are adequate solvents

    for the chain polymers. Some of the polymers also provide ster

    ic

    hindrance

    in

    an queous water-based) system, for example, phosphate esters.

    Aqueous slips utilizing electrostatic repulsion are commonly used for

    slip casting. Techniques o slip preparation and slip casting are discussed

    in

    the following sections. Nonaqueous slips utilizing steric hindrance are

    commonly used for tape casting. Tape casting is discussed later

    in

    this

    chapter.

    Slip reparation

    The actual physical preparation of the slip can be done by a variety of

    techniques. Perhaps the most common is wet ball milling or mixing.

    he

    ingredients. including the powder, binders. wetting agents, sintering aids,

    and dispersing agents, are added to the mill with the proper proportion of

    the selected casting liquid and milled to achieve thorough mixing, wetting,

    and usua ll

    y

    particle size reduction. The

    sl ip is

    then allowed to age until

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    459/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    460/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    461/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    462/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    463/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    464/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    465/844

    ShapeForming Processes 465

    Figure 10.36 Annular combustor for gas-turbin e engine fabricated by drain casting

    using nonabsorbing pine and mandrel inserted into the mo

    ld

    . Courtesy Garrett

    Turbine Engine Company, fabricated by Norton Company.)

    channels into the stator vane mold during cast ing. The reservoir and vane

    patterns are bonded together by simple

    wax

    welding and are shown

    as

    the

    white wax assembly

    in

    the center

    o

    Fig. 10.37. Below this is the mold

    produced by dipping and dissolving the pattern. Below the mold is the

    green casting after dissolving

    th

    e mold and trimming off any material re

    maining in the reservoir or gating area. The stator vane discussed above

    required less than 1 hr casting time. Some solid castings require much

    longer time such as the prototype gas-turbine rotor shown in Fig. 10.38.

    t

    required over 12 hr. The slip must be very stable for such long casting

    time to avoid settling

    o

    large particles or adverse changes in viscosity.

    Other fugitive mold techniques have been developed to fabricate spe

    cial shapes. One technique produces low weight, but strong ceramic foam

    19). Reticulated foam similar to a dishwashing sponge is used as the mold

    interior. Ret iculated polymer foam

    o

    the desired pore size is cut to the

    desired shape and placed in a container in a vacuum chamber. A ceramic

    slip in poured into the container

    and

    under vacu

    um

    complete

    ly

    infiltrates

    the pores in the reticulated foam. The slip is dried and fired to burn off

    the polymer foam and densify the ceramic. The resulting part consists

    o

    an

    internal cast

    o

    the spongelike foam. Its major characteristic is contin

    uous interconnected links

    o

    ceramic and continuous pore channels. Such

    a cellular structure can be very

    li

    ghtweight and surprisingly strong. Ex-

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    466/844

    66

    Chapter 10

    . .

    1

    .

    Figure 10.37

    The

    fugitive-wax technique for

    preparing

    a complex-shape mold for

    slip

    castingj example of

    fabrication

    of a stator vane

    for

    a gas-turbine engine. Cour

    tesy AiResearch Casting Company . Division

    of

    The

    Garrett Corporation, presently

    the

    Garrett Ceramic

    Components Division of Allied-Signal Aerospace.

    amples are shown in Fig. 10.39. Note from the photograph that a variety

    of

    pore sizes have

    been achieved from

    several

    different ceramic materials.

    he

    materials are successfully used for molten metal filtration and kiln

    furniture and are being evaluated for removing particles from the exraust

    of

    diesel engines.

    Some components are too complex to

    e

    fabricated in one piece by

    casting. An example

    is

    th

    turbine scroll shown in Fig. 10.40 a). The turbine

    scroll

    is

    an important component

    in

    many gas-turbine designs.

    t

    changes

    the direction of the hot gases coming out of the combustor to allow them

    to pass through the rotor. The scroll in Fig. 10.40 a)

    is

    SiC. t was fabricated

    by assembling the parts shown in Fig. JO.40 b) [20]. The shroud, sleeve ,

    and ring were formed y isostatic pressing and green machining. The body

    and duct were fabricated y slip casting. The parts were successfully bonded

    together with a CrVTi braze developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratories

    ORNL).

    A final casting technique

    is ele trophoreti deposition

    EPD).

    t

    utilizes

    an electrostatic charge to consolidate ceramic particles from a suspension.

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    467/844

    Shape-Forming

    Processes

    67

    cm

    Figure 10.38 Prototype gas-turbine

    rotor

    fabricated by slip

    casting

    using a

    fugitive

    waxtype

    process

    , Courtesy AiResearch Casting

    Company.

    Division of

    the

    Garrett

    Corporation. presently

    the Garrett

    Ceramic Components Division of AlliedSignaJ

    Aerospace.

    An electrical polarity

    is

    applied to the mold that

    is

    opposite to the polarity

    at the surface of the ceramic particles The ceramic particles are electrically

    attracted to the mold surface and deposit

    as

    a uniform compact When the

    desired thickness o deposit is achieved, either the mold is removed from

    the container of slip or the slip

    is

    poured from the mold Electrophoretic

    deposition

    is

    generally used to deposit a thin coating or to produce a thin-

    walled body such

    as

    a tube t is also used to achieve very uniform dep-

    osition

    o

    spray paint onto a conductive surface.

    All o the casting techniques discussed above result

    in

    a relatively weak

    ceramic powder compact A technique recently developed at

    ORNL

    results

    in

    a much stronger compact This technique

    is

    referred to

    as

    gel casting

    The ceramic powder

    is

    mixed with a liquid and a polymerizable additive

    to form a fluid slurry similar to a casting slip The slip

    is

    poured into a

    container o the desired shape. Polymerization is caused to occur before

    the powder

    in

    the slip has time to settle The resulting powder compact

    is

    quite uniform and strong. However . removal o the liquid is more difficult

    than for conventional slip casting. Furthermore, monomers are generally

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    468/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    469/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    470/844

    a)

    b)

    47

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    471/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    472/844

    472

    Slurry

    source

    octor

    blade

    Warm

    I

    air

    . /

    ( source

    : = t ' ~ - -

    ' I ~

    Take-up

    \ ? ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - ~ ~ t : 1 reel

    01

    Reel

    o

    .....

    .

    carner

    film

    Supporl

    structure

    Chapter 1

    Figure 10.41 Schematic illustrating the doctor blade tape-casting process,

    Other

    Tape Casting Processes

    A second tapecasting process is the waterfall technique. It is iI1ustrated

    in Fig. 10.42. The slurry is pumped in a recirculating system to form a

    continuous

    curtain.

    A conveyor

    belt

    carries a flat

    surface

    through the slurry.

    The uniform, thin layer of slurry on the carrier is then transferred

    by

    Slip

    trough

    Curta in 1

    of

    sl

    ip

    Drying stage

    BBB

    11l\\ /l \ X/l \\

    Subs

    t

    ate

    carrier

    . ,

    Conveyor

    bell

    c

    C o f l ~ c t i o n

    trough

    Recirculating

    pump

    Figure 10.42 Schematic illustrating

    the

    wa terfa tape-casting proce

    ss. (From

    J

    Adair

    , University of Florida.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    473/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    474/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    475/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    476/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    477/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    478/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    479/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    480/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    481/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    482/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    483/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    484/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    485/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    486/844

    86

    Chapter 1

    Figure 10.52 A variety o ceramic

    parts

    that have been fabricated

    by

    extrusion.

    Photo courtesy Superior Technical Ceramics Corporation, St. Albans, Vermont.)

    pose and leave a carbon residue The acrylic binders are an exception

    They burn out cleanly

    in

    inert and reducing atmospheres as well as oxidizing

    a

    tmospheres

    .

    ommon Extrusion Defects

    Extrusion is often more of an art than a science Quality is controlled

    y

    careful inspection of extruded compacts for defects Defects that can occur

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    487/844

    Shape-Forming Processes

    87

    for extrusion include

    warpage

    or distortion lamination tearing cracking

    segregation, porosity, and inclusions

    [27J

    Warpage or distortion can occur during drying or firing

    due to density

    variations or during extrusion due to improper die alignment or die design.

    f

    the alignment or balance of the die

    is

    not correct, greater pressure on

    one side of

    the

    die

    will

    occur.

    This will

    cause

    more

    material to extrude

    from this

    side

    and result in

    bending of the extruded

    column as

    it exits the

    die.

    aminations are cracks that

    generally form a

    pattern

    or orientation.

    Examples are

    shown in Fig.

    10.53. A

    common

    cause

    is

    incomplete re

    knitting as the plastic

    mix

    is cut by the auger or flows past the spider portion

    of the die. The spider

    is

    the portion of the die that supports any shaped

    channels in the die. For example to extrude a

    circular

    tube a solid

    rod

    of the inner diameter of the tube must be supported at the center of the

    die. t is generally supported by three prongs at 120 to each other that

    run parallel to the length of the die and are attached to the inside of the

    die. The material being extruded must squeeze around these prongs and

    reunite into a continuous hollow cylinder before leaving the die.

    Lami

    nations occur if the material does not completely reknit.

    earing consists of surface

    cracks that

    form

    as the material

    exits

    the

    extruder. This is illustrated

    in

    Fig. 10.54. The cracks extending from the

    surface

    inward

    result

    from

    the contact stresses

    and friction that are dis

    cussed

    earlier

    in

    this

    chapter. Too dry a

    mix

    with inadequate cohesiveness

    will

    tear. A

    mix

    with high rebound may also tend to tear. Die design

    involving a slight divergent

    taper

    at

    the die

    exit

    can help

    prevent

    tearing.

    Lamination and tearing

    are

    two

    sources of cracking.

    ther cracks can

    occur due to

    poor

    mixing, shrinkage

    variation

    and partially dried debris

    from a

    prior

    extrusion

    run.

    Segregation

    involves a separation of

    the liquid and

    solid portions of

    the

    mix

    during

    extrusion.

    This

    can

    result in cracking

    or distortion

    during

    extrusion or during subsequent drying or

    firing.

    Figure 10.53 Drawings of the cross sections of extruded parts illustrating the

    appearance

    of severe laminations that can

    occur

    as

    extrusion

    defects. From Ref.

    27.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    488/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    489/844

    Shape.Forming Protcsses

    89

    Figure 10.55 Cross sections of extruded honeycomb structures of cordierite for

    use

    as

    catalyst supports for automotive emission-control devices. Courtesy NGK

    Insulators.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    490/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    491/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    492/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    493/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    494/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    495/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    496/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    497/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    498/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    499/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    500/844

    s

    Chapter 10

    the

    flow

    pattern with alternate sprue and gate designs . In Fig. 10.59(a),

    the gate

    is

    at the end, but

    is

    directed perpendicular to the length of the

    cavity. In Fig. 1O.59(b), the gate

    is

    directed perpendicular, but placed at

    the center of the mold cavity. Plug flow resulted in both cases and knit

    line

    formation

    was minimized. This is

    further

    illustrated in

    Fig

    . 10.60 for

    actual injectionmolding trials. The short shot technique was used

    whereby injection

    was

    interrupted before the cavity

    was

    full By conducting

    a sequence of short shots, a good image of the nature of mold fill for each

    gate configuration could be obtained.

    After binder removal

    and

    densification, knit lines remain as large

    cracks, voids,

    or

    laminations and severely

    limit

    the strength of the part

    The short shot approach has been successfully used at Carborundum

    Company in developing integral radial rotors for an experimental auto

    motive gas turbine [37

    J

    Initial rotors were injected from the nose end.

    (Figure 10.61 illustrates the cross section of a radial rotor and identifies

    terminology that will be referred to subsequently). Short shots indicated

    a tendency for folds and knit lines to form in the thick region of the hub

    near the backface. This

    is

    illustrated

    in

    Fig. 10.62. This region is exposed

    to the

    highest

    stresses during

    engine operation,

    so

    major iterative efforts

    were conducted to minimize the

    knit

    line s Many parameters such

    as

    die

    temperature, injection pressure, ho

    ld

    time, and sprue bushing /nozzle

    di-

    ameter

    were

    systemmatically varied

    Sixteen

    resulting

    rotors were spin-

    tested and failed at an average speed of 80,500 rpm, significantly below

    Figure 10.60 Sequence o short shots showing the nature o mold fill for two

    different sprue and gate orientations, t\ ASM International.)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    501/844

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    502/844

    S 2

    Chapter 1

    (a)

    Figure 10.62 Sequence of short shots for injection molding of a SiC

    rotor

    from

    the nose end. Note the knit Jines in the hub and backface regions . (Photos courtesy

    Carborundum Company for parts fabricated for Allison Gas Turbine Division of

    General Motors under sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Energy and admin

    istration of NASALewis Research

    Center.)

    noncrystalline to crystalline. For

    exa

    mple ,

    the

    volume change for

    one

    pol

    ypropylene sys

    tem due to

    thermal contraction was about 2.75 vol

    and

    due to crystallization was about 1.75

    vol

    for a total

    of

    about 4.5 vol .

    f the outer shell is rigid

    and cannot

    shrink, while the inner material is

    more fluid and can reposition during further cooling, 4.5 shrinkage is

    adequate

    to form a void or crack through the

    center

    of the part. Such a

    void or crack is typically not visible by examining the surface of the injec

    tion-molded

    part and

    may not even be visible

    after

    densificiation . Figure

    10.65 illust rates a large lenticular (lens-shaped) void

    in

    a

    Si

    , N, turbocharger

    rotor

    that

    resulted primarily from th is mechanism.

    pplicatiolls

    o

    Illjectioll Moldillg

    Injection molding

    is

    usually selected for ceramics only

    after

    other

    processes

    have been rejected.

    t

    can produce a high degree of complexity. but the

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    503/844

    b)

    e)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    504/844

    5 4

    Chapter 1

    a)

    Figure 10.63 Sequence of short shots for injection molding of a Si rotor from

    the shaft end. Note the absence of knit lines in the hub and backface region.

    Photos courte

    sy arborundum ompany

    for

    parts fabricated

    for Allison

    Gas

    Tur-

    bine Division of General Motors under sponsorship of the U.S. Department of

    Energy and administration of NASA-Lewis Research Center.)

    initial cost of tooling is very high . For example, a mold to fabricate an

    individual turbine blade can cost over 10,000 and a mold for a turbine

    rotor over ]00,000. Molds for simple shapes and molds made o aluminum

    for low-pressure injection molding aT much less expensive . s a result,

    the use of injection molding of ceramics is increasing.

    Injection molding is presently used to manufacture a variety of parts

    including cores for investment lost-wax) casting

    of

    metals, weld caps,

    thread guides, threaded fasteners (nut and bolt pairs), radomes, and pro-

    totype gas-turbine engine components, Drawings of complex investment

    casting cores for cooled metal gas-turbine blades or stator vanes are shown

    in Fig, 10.66. During investment casting, the core is mounted in a ceramic

    mold. Molten superalloy is poured into the mold around the core. The

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    505/844

    b)

    e)

  • 7/26/2019 David Richerson Modern Ceramic Engineering.pdf

    506/844

    506

    Chapter 10

    .

    ,

    r ' I .

    c

    -..

    1, ' .:

    , . , ..

    I

    Figure 10.64 Examples o optimized SiC rotors injection-molded from the shaft

    end. The rotor on the left

    is

    as-molded the one on the right

    is

    after sintering.

    Photo courtesy Carborundum Company,)

    ceramic mold

    is removed from the outside of the

    metal

    part The

    injection-

    molded ceramic

    ore

    is leached from the interior

    o

    the blade or vane to

    leave a complex cooling path This substantially reduces the cost o man

    ufacturing

    o

    internally cooled stator vanes and rotor blades for advanced

    gas-turbine engines.

    Examples

    o

    o