dbq: the road to war
DESCRIPTION
DBQ on the world war for AP world historyTRANSCRIPT
Rahimi 1
Tara Rahimi
Mr. Greaney
WHAP period 4
April 8, 2013
DBQ: The Road to War
The beginning of the 1920s started out peacefully, but by the end of the decade and throughout
the 1930s, signs of war were starting to show. Countries such as Germany, Italy, and Japan started
taking aggressive actions. The British Prime Minister Chamberlain suggested that the best way to deal
with Hitler was by making a policy of appeasement. European nations waited for the worst before
forcing Hitler to halt his invasive actions. Therefore, Hitler’s invasions, the League of Nations, and their
appeasement were the main reasons the world plunged into World War II and the most effective
response to aggression is collective security.
After the First World War, Germany faced many negative economic impacts during the 1930’s.
People were out of jobs, and the value of the German Mark was next to nothing. The Germans were
desperately looking for a miracle that could take them out of their economic slump into prosperity.
When Hitler became the dictator of Nazi Germany in 1934, he started blaming the Jews for Germany’s
misfortunes and promised to do everything in his power to bring wealth back to Germany. Part of his
plan to revive Germany was to take territories back for the nation “not by flaming protests, but by a
mighty sword” (Doc 1). In this particular passage of his book, Hitler explained that he would forcefully
expand into other countries. He kept his promise by sending German troops to Rhineland, a buffer zone
between France and Germany, in 1936. Afterwards, Hitler explained his actions by saying: “‘I look up this
day as marking the close of the struggle for German equality status...’” (Doc 3). Hitler lied to Europe,
claiming that Rhineland would be his last invasion, but in reality, it was only the beginning of his
aggression. After Rhineland, Hitler started invading more and more countries, which assured the world a
Rahimi 2
rising of another great war. The League of Nations lack of proper action by continuing to appease Hitler
was another reason the world plunged into World War II.
A main cause for World War II was the policy of appeasement and the League of Nation’s weak
attempt to try to stop Hitler. When Italy attacked Ethiopia in 1935, Haile Selassie, the emperor of
Ethiopia, requested the League of Nations help to stop the invasion. However, the League's lack of
response resulted in full invasion of Ethiopia. Selassie said, "God and history will remember your
judgment... It is us today. It will be you tomorrow" (Doc 2). Selassie was saying that the League of
Nations would essentially suffer for not helping Ethiopia in their time of need. After Hitler sent his
military into the Rhineland, Paris appealed to the league. “France has laid Germany’s latest treaty
violation before the Council of the League of Nations” (Doc 3). France asked the League to remove
Germany from the Rhineland diplomatically or with stronger pressure, but the league still did not take
action. Chamberlain wanted to deal with Hitler with appeasement and in Munich Chamberlin stated,
“With little good will and determination, it is possible to remove grievances and clear away suspicion…
we must try to bring these four nations into friendly discussion. If they can settle their differences, we
shall save the peace of Europe for a generation” (Doc 5). Chamberlain later stated in The Times that he
did not want to give up his hope of a peaceful solution. Winston Churchill, however, disagreed with
Chamberlain and in his speech to Parliament in 1938 he warned England about the policy of
appeasement. He also spoke out to the League of Nations, saying that Nazi Germany has weakened the
League and have put Europe in a position where they don’t have strong national defense or an
international system of security. The weakened League and the policy of appeasement plunged Europe
into World War II. An effective response to aggression would have been collective security.
Collective security would have been a much better way to respond to aggression because
appeasement was not effective. Appeasement made Hitler feel that he could violate the Versailles treaty
Rahimi 3
because he knew that Europe wanted to maintain peace, therefore, they would not take action against
him. Neville Chamberlain supported appeasement and believed it was the answer for when Hitler
demanded for Sudetenland, a section of Czechoslovakia. Hitler promised that he would recognize
Czechoslovakia’s new boundary lines, but six months later he took over the entire country. The French
and British also supported appeasement even when Hitler wanted to take the Rhineland. Later, Hitler
admitted that if the French and British had tried to stop him he would have backed down. By using
appeasement Europe was giving Hitler exactly what he wanted, which was why collective security would
have been a better response to the aggression. If Europe had used collective security, they could have
gained back the power they had lost. Hitler was easily taking over countries and land, because none of
the countries of the League of Nations did not want to disrupt peace in Europe. In the end, this backfired
on Europe because it caused the Second World War.
World War II happened for many reasons and there was no way of stopping it from occurring.
The disagreements and aggression between France, Italy and Japan signalled the coming of another
world war. Choosing appeasement over collective security weakened the League of Nations power and
gave Hitler what he should have never been granted. We were plunged into World War II because of the
League of Nations betrayal and for not handling conflicts in the correct manner.